Terminating... I wonder why.
Scott
On 11/6/06, Jeroen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/2/06, Jeroen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After booting the openntpd log shows lines like this:
Nov 2 11:23:52 ntpd[1517]: Lost child: child exited
Nov 2 11:23:52 ntpd[1517]: dispatch_imsg in main: pipe
There are many discussions about this in the forum. Please visit
forum.pfsense.com
On 11/1/06, Sean Cavanaugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it would be a good idea to add the Basic Analysis and Security
Engine (BASE) to augment the snort port as it makes analyzing the logs a lot
easier.
GZSIG is what we use to sign the images. You can remove the commands
from your scripts.
On 11/1/06, Kelvin Chiang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I have tried to run the script build_updates.sh to get an iso with
latest image, but it prompted me for gzsig. I downloaded gzsig.tgz and try
to
You are missing the _ntp user if you upgraded. Search the forum for _ntp
Scott
On 11/1/06, Jeroen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As the title notes, OpenNTPD fails to start at boot-up. When i go to
the services menu after the boot, it says its not started. Forcing a
start works however.
What
On 10/31/06, Jason J. Ellingson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Snort worked fine until I installed 1.0.1 (from 1.0)
Now, I see the normal startup messages for snort in the system logs and
get the usual memory and CPU use as before, but nothing seems to
actually trigger a snort alert or add anything
On 10/31/06, Lee Hetherington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thats fantastic. Works like a charm!!
Thanks John
Did it require a reboot?
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Not a bug, Snort will copy the needed files once you set it up. You
need to select at minimum an interface to listen on and click save.
On 10/30/06, Brookenmire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have loaded the snort into pfsense 1.01 but I was unable to start
it.
The logs show the
On 10/30/06, Dimitri Rodis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys--
Grats on release.
I noticed in the changelog the following:
PF does not know about congestion flags, remove from shaper
What does that mean?
It is a TCP flag. It never worked to begin with.
Also, I still have a customer who
It is a known issue and the update has been pulled.
On 10/30/06, Braden McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was running 1.0-release with miniupnpd installed. Last night I downloaded
and applied the 1.0.1 mini-update. The system wrote to flash and rebooted,
and I watched it post and all of
On 10/30/06, Braden McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, will a full flash resolve it, or is it a bug with 1.0.1 embedded in
general?
Yes and yes.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:36 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject
D-link does this more than I change socks... Really do not recommend
their nics at all. I know they are nice and cheap and look attractive
but fight the urge and use a vendor that does not pull these dirty
tricks.
On 10/30/06, Holger Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sometimes hardwarevendors
Check out http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=BootTroubleShooting
On 10/27/06, PlanAlpha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to install onto a Transcend DOM and I'm not having any
success. The system boots the livecd just fine and I option 99 to
install onto the DOM. The install seems to go
I fixed this recently. Reinstall snort.
On 10/27/06, Darren Cockburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I love pfsense - really - I've been using it for about 5 months and it's
the best software gateway I have ever used!
Any way ...
Any idea how to Speed up the snort blocked rules page?
It takes
/inc/pkg-utils.inc(444) : eval()'d code on line 1
Snort seemed to be uninstalled.
Went to packages and installed it. Works.
- Jason
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 12:10 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense
Yes. Fast-CGI.
On 10/27/06, Darren Cockburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Are there suppose to be two PHP processes running?
I killed the first one and things seem fine ???
- Darren
TOP OUTPUT:
last pid: 43326; load averages: 3.20, 3.14, 2.26
up 1+17:17:46 15:02:00
35 processes: 3
- can get in via ssh
I ran /usr/local/etc/rc.d/snort.sh stop - and still cannot get in via
a browser.
- Darren.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 2:33 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense - Speed up
On 10/24/06, Craig Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi - couldn't find any info on this in the wiki or whatever so here goes.
Luckily I have a test wrap so I though t I would try the firmware update
option with the mini embedded update to see what mileage I got - previously
I have reflashed a new
On 10/25/06, Patric Lichtsteiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using the load balancer functionality from pfSense to split our
traffic to 2 different WAN lines. This works very good so far.
Since 1.0-release I have troubles with ftp traffic. Connecting to a
ftp server and executing
On 10/24/06, Robert Goley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just noticed the final version was out yesterday, Do you have any news on
the RRD graphs for OPTx interfaces?
There have been no changes.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
No, unfortunately NAT-T did not make it into 1.0.
Scott
On 10/23/06, Tommaso Di Donato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all!
Sorry, i've benn out for a while, so I misse the important news and I'm
trying to get in touch now. Just a question: with the new release, the NAT-T
is working or not?
On 10/23/06, Bastian Schern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks,
the wiki helps. I disable DMA in /boot/loader.conf and it works. But I
have still two questions:
1. Will a firmware update modify the loader.conf?
No, it shouldn't.
2. Which file I must edit to go enable UDMA4 mode?
I don't recall being a set number. If there is, its in the hundreds.
On 10/18/06, Brookenmire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any information of maximum values within PfSense V1.0 ?
In particular, I was wondering what is the maximum number of networks that
can be added to a
On 10/17/06, Robert Perciaccante, CISSP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a very odd question. In order for firewall rules to be saved and
put into effect, i need to reboot the box, even after hitting apply, and
there are no indications that I can see (read: pfsense noob) of a problem.
When
On 10/17/06, Robert Perciaccante, CISSP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the quick response! Here is the output of those commands.
$ ps awux | grep check_reload_status | grep -v grep | wc -l
0
$ cat /tmp/check_reload_status
/tmp/rc.newwanip
As it turns out, the port changes (for
On 10/17/06, Robert Perciaccante, CISSP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the latest times it has done the result was sleeping...
I've commited some code to work around the bug. It will be included
in 1.0.1 which will be published in a couple weeks.
Scott
Sounds like this http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/tktview?tn=1129,6
On 10/16/06, J. Ryan Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me explain something here since I'm not making the problem clear.
The problem has -nothing- at all to do with the Cisco firewall. The
setsockopt errors occur -well before- any
Known problem with pr440fx's. Install pfSense to the hard drive
running on a alternative system then move the hard drive back over.
This works great for all our pentium pro based machines.
Scott
On 10/16/06, Jure Pečar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to install pfsense 1.0
Do this from Diagnotics - Command - PHP Command:
unset($config['interfaces']['wan']['gateway']);
write_config();
On 10/14/06, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Captain Bablam wrote:
Good morning all,
I have replaced a linux box as my core distribution router with
a PFsense box. I
Remove the custom --ping-restart command.
On 10/11/06, Captain Bablam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good morning Rob,
No I am running this over TCP, I can lower the ping time and see
if that makes a difference.
Wade B
On 10/11/06, Rob Terhaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/10/06, Captain
On 10/11/06, Pierre Frisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you very much that did the trick. May be we should have a more
obvious setting -:)
It is the exact same as m0n0wall. We are not changing this.
Scott
-
To
Upgrade to 1.0-RC3e.
Apply a, b, c, d then e in that order.
On 10/11/06, Kyle Mott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm running RC3, and every time I save my config, the webgui hangs. I
deleted my tun0 interface, but it looks like it's still trying to bring
up the tun0 interface which is hosing
That is correct. Not everyone has enough ram to update with a 33
megabyte update file.
On 10/10/06, Alan Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Embedded update does not include new binarys. Recent update of openntpd
was not included in the mini update
I have no idea about this one.. However the ipfw messages are related
to the captive portal.
swap_pager_getswapspace(n): failed means you have run out of ram.
All that I can think of is run a top and post the output when it goes nuts.
On 10/9/06, Roberto Greiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I really dont see how on earth this is possible. What browser?
On 10/8/06, David Strout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it my imagination or has the web interface
slowed down? I just upgraded to the official
RC3 and the GUI (webConfigurator) seems MUCH, MUCH
slower a screen redraws and refreshes.
I cannot reproduce this. Please use Wink and record a session with it blinking.
The webConfigurator has been tested with ie7, firefox 2, firefox 1,
and safari and I don't see anything even remotely close to what you
describe.
And how does flashing have anything to do with being slow?
On
On 10/8/06, Fuchs, Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi !
When I configure OpenVPN and save the config without packages, pfsense
does not save the openvpn settings, in the config.xml the settings are
stored under packages.
Should this be the intended behaviour ?
No. From the PHP command
Apparently this is a rather new feature to even m0n0wall and may be
broken. Please let me know as we will need to remove its option if
this is the case.
On 10/6/06, Roberto Greiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok,
monday morning I will try it. The system is scheduled to enter
production midday,
Please try and upload this fix:
http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/pfSense-1.0-RC3d-Full-Embedded.tgz to
System - Firmware.
In terms of the reboot and halt issues, this is generally ACPI
related, make sure your BIOS is up to date and check out
http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=BootOptions
Newest version will not apply to 6.1, it is meant for RELENG_6/FreeBSD 6.2.
Scott
On 10/5/06, Alan Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Been looking at the ath hal version on pfsense and considering testing
latest version from sam but can not seem to find how to add this into
our
Build routine.
or menu the settings are saved, so it seems to be a
gui error !?
MArtin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Oktober 2006 18:16
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: Re: [pfSense Support] Script Errors
Please try and upload this fix:
http
I've fixed the BCMOD error. Will be reposting the update again shortly.
On 10/5/06, Roberto Greiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roberto Greiner wrote:
Scott Ullrich wrote:
Please try and upload this fix:
http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/pfSense-1.0-RC3d-Full-Embedded.tgz to
System - Firmware
Update reposted. Please download again and upload to System - Firmware.
On 10/5/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've fixed the BCMOD error. Will be reposting the update again shortly.
On 10/5/06, Roberto Greiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roberto Greiner wrote:
Scott Ullrich wrote
Woops, please try again. It works now.
On 10/5/06, Roberto Greiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Ullrich wrote:
Update reposted. Please download again and upload to System - Firmware.
I'm getting a corrupt image error. Something is wrong with this image.
Roebrto
Alan,
Edit pfsense_local.sh . You will see the settings in there.
Scott
On 10/5/06, Alan Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I understand you bill I could just start a 6.2 branch and see if
I have success with build there? Yes?
Will try this out don't know if I want to go that far
)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Oktober 2006 20:45
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: Re: [pfSense Support] Script Errors
How about providing the GUI error?
On 10/5/06, Fuchs, Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have installed 3 new systems
Alright, the latest version I just posted should hopefully do the
trick. Just tested it at work.
Scott
On 10/5/06, Roberto Greiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Ullrich wrote:
Update reposted. Please download again and upload to System - Firmware.
I'm getting a corrupt image error
On 10/4/06, Benoît Beaujault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
More and more applications, due to firewall filtering, move to HTTP, is
it in the roadmap of pfsense to propose a fonctionnality to filter some
applications over HTTP (peer-to-peer, MSN, ICQ and so on) ?
Squid is our first starting
CVS is not public. Use CVSUP instead.
Scott
On 10/4/06, Thorsten Zenker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
problem on my or pfsense.com side? - Torsten
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 10/3/06, D.Pageau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to add a second IP to my WAN interface. I use to do it with
ifconfig alias on FreeBSD but can't find any option to do it with
pfSense GUI.
The purpose is to have my pfSense OpenVPN server available on two
different IP for some time.
For
On 10/3/06, Kyle Mott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not required, but it is nice to have, as you can monitor traffic on
it via SNMP. Can we leave it assigned without harmful effects?
Doubt it. But it all depends on what services you use from pfSense.
Anything that uses tunX will end up
On 10/2/06, Alvaro Pietrobono [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enter an option: 5
Terminated
tcsetpgrp failed, errno=25
This is the message that pfsense RC3
diplay on terminal when you choose option 5,
then It's reboot normally.
This is a FreeBSD bug. We've tried and tried and tried and tried
On 10/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day all,
I just downloaded the upgrade to RC3 and installed it on my pfSense
firewall.
Everything appears to be ok except when I click on the LAN tab under
Firewall = Rules I only shown 13.5 of my rules. The 14th rule only shows
Proto,
On 10/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day again,
ok I cleared the cache and rebooted my machine however I am still getting
the same error.
With IE it shows me the td class=... line as mentioned originally, however
with firefox it just stops displaying the page half-way down
On 10/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am only using IE 6, however if you can't reproduce it even in firefox then
I'll try a complete full re-install.
If I do a backup of my current configuration, re-install, then restore my
configuration - that would be the correct procedure
On 10/2/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am only using IE 6, however if you can't reproduce it even in firefox then
I'll try a complete full re-install.
If I do a backup of my current configuration, re-install, then restore
On 9/30/06, Captain Bablam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good afternoon,
Anyone get a chance to look at the attached and make sense of it?
Thanks everyone.
Yes, the documentation that was posted to our sites was incorrect.
You need to be running on the most recent snapshot and you need to
On 9/29/06, Michael Schuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Scott,
a little bit late but better then never.
Here are the two patches for the squid config's.
Back to my other question about proxyarp
net.link.ether.inet.proxyall=1
now i know put this setting in /etc/sysctl.conf makes it not
No, you need to look at the shellcmd.
On 9/29/06, Michael Schuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Scott,
Thanks for the patch.
In terms of the command that you need to run on bootup, take a look at
http://faq.pfsense.com/index.php?sid=120897lang=enaction=artikelcat=10id=38artlang=en
thank you
All--
RC3 is right around the corner and we would like to get the squid
package nailed down and working 100%.
If you feel like helping us out, that would be great. Here's what we need:
Install the latest snapshot from
http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-27-06/
Install the squid
? In addition
the RC2 worked fine for about 12 hours, I disconnected and then tried
to reconnect, I never could get it to reconnect. Thanks.
Wade B
On 9/26/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/26/06, Captain Bablam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Upon rolling back to RC2 everything works
?
Thanks Scott, Wade B
On 9/28/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This problem is related to connectivity:
Thu Sep 28 09:34:01 2006 us=993530 Attempting Basic Proxy-Authorization
Thu Sep 28 09:34:01 2006 us=993541 Send to HTTP proxy:
'Proxy-Authorization: Basic
with crunched
down timers for fast convergence. It works awesome. The two others
peers are an openwrt box and an FC5 box all running quagga. No static,
all dynamic, the daemon just has to come up for that to work ;~)
-W
On 9/28/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quagga is not working as of yet
On 9/28/06, Captain Bablam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone listed a link to the ports tree,
So I installed it. Let me know if I can help you out getting
it mainstream.
Only packages that appear in System - Packages are supported.
On 9/28/06, Captain Bablam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK good to know thank you,
Are there plans to support quagga? I thought I saw that on the
list a while back?
I am not sure at this point.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
You really should proceed with the snapshot, but its your machine...
Scott
On 9/27/06, Roberto Greiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes,
I know about the upgrade procedure. I was just thinking that if the new
version was due to release, it would be no problem for me wait, say, a
couple of
On 9/27/06, Roberto Greiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a feature in monowall that I can't seem to locate in pfSense,
which is 'User Management'. Is it not available? (I'm using 1.0rc2).
Thank you,
This feature is not in 1.0 for pfSense. It is in our development tree
and will be
On 9/26/06, Michael Schuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i would configure portforwarding with an aliased Host-Address.
The aliased ports shows me to work, but the aliased host ip doesnt work.
the interface get me the correct completition, but if i press save i
get the error
message in the
On 9/26/06, Captain Bablam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good morning all,
I upgraded from rc2 to 1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-21-06 built on Sat Sep 23
00:46:42 UTC 2006. Since that time I have seen sporadic issues
connecting to my openvpn server running on TCP/443 (I tried 80 as
well) stright connect and
On 9/26/06, Alvaro Pietrobono [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone help me?
I have to access to a corrupted Cf
with a non bootable system.
I got etherboot rom image from http://rom-o-matic.net but
unsuccessfully.
I read some doc but I didn't find a solution.
thanx in advance.
Etherbooting +
On 9/26/06, Captain Bablam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Scott,
So in looking closer I was actually on the
openvpn-2.0.7-gui-1.0.3 (winXP). I uninstalled and reinstalled this
and atempted to connect with the same results. Next steps;
1. anyone experienced anything like this?
2. How can I
On 9/26/06, Captain Bablam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yup,
I did, and changed the listening port to 443 and 80, same result.
Keeping in mind this worked flawlessly on rc2 with no fw rules. And I
am logging the permits so I can see the traffic being permitted.
-W
Please email me
On 9/26/06, Rolf Sommerhalder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After spending some time on this earlier this year, I finally got
OpenBSD's pxeboot to successfully net-boot OpenBSD on my WRAPs. The
problem was with the Etherboot binary which is included within the
BIOS v1.08 and v1.10 from PCengines. I
On 9/26/06, Aggelis Aggelis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have installed pfsense embedded snapshot 09/22/2006.
during the boot of the system , the kernel crashes (curiously not at
every boot) and the system reboots.
The problem is as far as i can see the usb subsystem.
i would like to try to
On 9/26/06, Aggelis Aggelis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/27/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The kernel configuration file is:
http://cvs.pfsense.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/tools/builder_scripts/conf/pfSense.6?rev=1.33
The patches file is:
http://cvs.pfsense.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi
On 9/26/06, SDamron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really don't care...I do not use that OS that they are written
for...and I use GMail :o)
Ditto here on gmail. Not only that I deinstalled that VML exploit
weeks ago and scanned my computers and no viruses exist.
I would say your ISP's virus
On 9/25/06, Marc Boisis-Delavaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry but scp and sftp does'nt work.
Yes it does.
For other reply, I want fileserver because at home I have'nt a lot of
hardware, so I want fileserver and firewall on the same hardware. And I
know the risks !!
Please search
On 9/25/06, Rob Terhaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
not sure if this is going to be helpful-
but after an update to 9-22-snapshot and a reboot this morning on our
pfsense, users were complaining that they were able to do anything on
the vpn connection after they were authenticated via openvpn.
I
On 9/24/06, Kyle Mott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I just installed it yesterday (1.0-SNAPSHPT-09-21-06). Even with
no rules on tun0, all clients get full access to any internal system.
Has anyone else run into this?
Same situation with IPSEC, there is not fine control of traffic yet.
We
and the error below is
from Internet Explorer. The error only occurs after logon and no traffic
will pass through the portal then.
FYI I use the portal tied into IAS for radius authentication.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 9:42
On 9/24/06, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no. The OpenBSD pf list (don't recall if it's on misc@ or the pf
list) has some comments on how to implement this.
This goes over the situation quite well:
http://archive.openbsd.nu/?ml=openbsd-pfa=2005-01t=635485
Scott
On 9/24/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/24/06, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no. The OpenBSD pf list (don't recall if it's on misc@ or the pf
list) has some comments on how to implement this.
This goes over the situation quite well:
http://archive.openbsd.nu/?ml
On 9/24/06, Kyle Mott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No worries, I just wanted to make sure others were aware of it, so they
aren't under the same assumption I was.
Is there somewhere that I can file a bug (for both OpenVPN and IPSEC) so
this can be tracked and fixed in a future release (hopefully)?
On 9/22/06, Fuchs, Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Scott !
I saw on the timeline-site that you wrote RC3 without NAT-T...
22:17 • Check-in
[14437]: We are releasing RC3 without NAT-T (By sullrich)
17:17 • Check-in
[14436]: Time to release RC3 minus NAT-T (By sullrich)
Will NAT-T be
On 9/22/06, Ronald Henriksen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has any thing changed for the captive portal feature with snap shot
pfSense-Full-Update-1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-20-2006 after login
from the portal I get a fatal error. I had to revert to
pfSense-Full-Update-RC2.tgz
to get the captive portal
Who out there actually uses OpenVPN and it works for them?
Please either respond here and describe your setup or reply privately to me.
We have a influx of OpenVPN problem reports and I am starting to
wonder if it works correctly at all.
On 9/20/06, cmaurand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
my pfsense box seems to think its a domain master browser on my SAMBA
network. Its constantly messing up my network neighborhood. What
gives? I don't have samba installed on that box. I don't seen anything
in the docs and I don't see a
On 9/19/06, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, there is a README in the same directory that explains quite a bit.
README?! What's that!? Shouldn't I just be asking questions and not READING!?
-
To unsubscribe,
Please contact me. I have something for you.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/19/06, Pedro Paulo de Magalhaes Oliveira Junior
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, I know since the guy in the room beside me is working on it.
Well, have them contact me. We need to get NAT-T tested.
(It's done, needs testing).
On 9/19/06, Catalin Epure [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have settled the load balancer section to use 2 isp connections.
For some reason the log looks like this:
Sep 19 03:10:13 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status,
reloading filter policy
Sep 19 03:10:13
On 9/19/06, Catalin Epure [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
v.1 R.C.2
Catalin
Please upgrade to
http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-18-06/ and see if
this solves the problems.
Thanks!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
On 9/14/06, Rob Terhaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So the reason why i started to dig into the status screen is because we've
started to have issues with the traffic shaper-
After about a day, it seems like the traffic shaper falls asleep, which
manifests it's self in drop outs on our VOIP
On 9/12/06, Alvaro Pietrobono [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It's possible to configure a vpn lan-to-lan with ipsec
and pfSense behind firewall?
I'm trying some different configurations but unsuccessful.
Thanx in advance.
pfSense does not have nat traversal support for IPSEC. Doubt it will
On 9/12/06, Rob Terhaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure if it was due to a reboot, mis-alignment of the planets, or the
snapshot, but my queue status page is busted for me in the latest 1.0
snapshots. I'm currently running the 9-10 snapshot, and when i browse to the
queue status page, all
On 9/12/06, Alvaro Pietrobono [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry Scott,
but I don't explained the problem very well.
Pfsense is behind a firewall and I'm trying to establish
vpn lan-to-lan with an Ipsec compliant (Cisco Concentrator in this case)
with a public ip.
Few minutes ago I found the
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,2053.0.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/9/06, Robert Carr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I realize pfsense isn't SMP-capable, but would it run
on a core-duo (or core-solo processor)? Or are these
processors totally unsupported for now?
I don't see any reason it wouldn't work. But I have to admit that
none of the developers have any
Due to the recent OpenSSL issue we strongly advise anyone utilizing
OpenSSL (HTTPS, SSH, OpenVPN, etc) to immediately upgrade to the
newest snapshot located at
http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-07-06/
For more information on this issue please visit
On 9/5/06, Nicolas A. Fabris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somebody?
Thks!
-Mensaje original-
De: Nicolas A. Fabris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: lunes, 04 de septiembre de 2006 17:16
Para: support@pfsense.com
Asunto: [pfSense Support] PPTP server
Hi folks!
We are testing PPTP
Ike is indeed a excellent speaker. I caught his jails presentation at
BSDCan a couple years ago and really enjoyed listening to him speak.
He also had a really thought out presentation.
Scott
On 9/5/06, Charles Sprickman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just in case we have any pfsense users in the
701 - 800 of 2009 matches
Mail list logo
