Re: Kill-filing threads for good??

Daniel wrote on 25/3/21 5:24 pm: Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 25/3/21 4:21 am: Daniel wrote: Quite often, on UseNet, I come across threads which I don't have the slightest interest in. Usually, I hit 'k' to kill-file the thread. But, then someone posts into that thread and I see it again.

Re: Kill-filing threads for good??

Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 25/3/21 4:21 am: Daniel wrote: Quite often, on UseNet, I come across threads which I don't have the slightest interest in. Usually, I hit 'k' to kill-file the thread. But, then someone posts into that thread and I see it again. How do I kill-file a thread, in my

Re: Kill-filing threads for good??

Daniel wrote: Quite often, on UseNet, I come across threads which I don't have the slightest interest in. Usually, I hit 'k' to kill-file the thread. But, then someone posts into that thread and I see it again. How do I kill-file a thread, in my SeaMonkey, so I never see it again . until

Re: Kill-filing threads for good??

On 3/24/21 8:40 AM, Daniel wrote: WaltS48 wrote on 24/3/21 11:17 pm: Daniel wrote: Quite often, on UseNet, I come across threads which I don't have the slightest interest in. Usually, I hit 'k' to kill-file the thread. But, then someone posts into that thread and I see it again. How do I

Re: Kill-filing threads for good??

WaltS48 wrote on 24/3/21 11:17 pm: Daniel wrote: Quite often, on UseNet, I come across threads which I don't have the slightest interest in. Usually, I hit 'k' to kill-file the thread. But, then someone posts into that thread and I see it again. How do I kill-file a thread, in my SeaMonkey,

Re: Kill-filing threads for good??

Daniel wrote: Quite often, on UseNet, I come across threads which I don't have the slightest interest in. Usually, I hit 'k' to kill-file the thread. But, then someone posts into that thread and I see it again. How do I kill-file a thread, in my SeaMonkey, so I never see it again . until

Kill-filing threads for good??

Quite often, on UseNet, I come across threads which I don't have the slightest interest in. Usually, I hit 'k' to kill-file the thread. But, then someone posts into that thread and I see it again. How do I kill-file a thread, in my SeaMonkey, so I never see it again . until I completely

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

Nuno Silva wrote: On 2020-09-01, Slugracing wrote: Slugracing wrote: Nuno Silva wrote: On 2020-08-19, Slugracing wrote: Nuno Silva wrote: On 2020-08-18, Slugracing wrote: [...] I too have come to a fork in the road and am now looking to move to another browser. the stalling and memory

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

On 2020-09-01, Slugracing wrote: > Slugracing wrote: >> Nuno Silva wrote: >>> On 2020-08-19, Slugracing wrote: >>> Nuno Silva wrote: > On 2020-08-18, Slugracing wrote: >>> [...] >> I too have come to a fork in the road and am now looking to move to >> another browser. the

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

WaltS48 wrote: On 9/1/20 12:40 AM, Slugracing wrote: Slugracing wrote: Nuno Silva wrote: On 2020-08-19, Slugracing wrote: Nuno Silva wrote: On 2020-08-18, Slugracing wrote: [...] I too have come to a fork in the road and am now looking to move to another browser. the stalling and memory

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

On 9/1/20 12:40 AM, Slugracing wrote: Slugracing wrote: Nuno Silva wrote: On 2020-08-19, Slugracing wrote: Nuno Silva wrote: On 2020-08-18, Slugracing wrote: [...] I too have come to a fork in the road and am now looking to move to another browser. the stalling and memory usage has now

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

Slugracing wrote: Nuno Silva wrote: On 2020-08-19, Slugracing wrote: Nuno Silva wrote: On 2020-08-18, Slugracing wrote: [...] I too have come to a fork in the road and am now looking to move to another browser. the stalling and memory usage has now gotten out of control. since we move to

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

Nuno Silva wrote: On 2020-08-19, Slugracing wrote: Nuno Silva wrote: On 2020-08-18, Slugracing wrote: [...] I too have come to a fork in the road and am now looking to move to another browser. the stalling and memory usage has now gotten out of control. since we move to the 2.53 series my

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

On 2020-08-19, Slugracing wrote: > Nuno Silva wrote: >> On 2020-08-18, Slugracing wrote: [...] >>> I too have come to a fork in the road and am now looking to move to >>> another browser. the stalling and memory usage has now gotten out of >>> control. since we move to the 2.53 series my ram

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

meagain wrote on 18-08-20 16:37: Original Message EE wrote on 15-08-20 19:21: Lance Courtland wrote: It is with much sadness that I must abandon SeaMonkey as a web browser. I have been a loyal user since Mosaic in 1993, then Netscape Navigator, then SM. However, I have

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

right now and Swap isn't being used, there is /currently/ no slowdown in performance. YouTube also has music. Some individual tracks from albums will also display a static video, it's usually the album cover for the duration of the track. Ok that's good info, but you need to show the initial

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

Nuno Silva wrote: On 2020-08-18, Slugracing wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Should I hand you a tissue so that you can whine quietly and in private? He is telling you he has an issue, just like most of us do. Flipping him off like that is child like. I too have come to a fork in the road

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

On 2020-08-19, Ray_Net wrote: > meagain wrote on 18-08-20 16:37: >> Original Message >>> EE wrote on 15-08-20 19:21: Lance Courtland wrote: > It is with much sadness that I must abandon SeaMonkey as a web > browser. I have been a loyal user since Mosaic in 1993,

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

en there is a noticeable slowdown of the system. If you can reproduce this easily and you're able to give a try to the version from https://www.seamonkey-project.org/, it would be good to know whether it behaves in the same way or not. -- Nuno Silva

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

meagain wrote on 18-08-20 16:37: Original Message EE wrote on 15-08-20 19:21: Lance Courtland wrote: It is with much sadness that I must abandon SeaMonkey as a web browser. I have been a loyal user since Mosaic in 1993, then Netscape Navigator, then SM. However, I have

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

Gerry Hickman wrote: Edward wrote: I have noticed increased memory usage with SeaMonkey, using the Fedora-supplied package, when listening to music either through YouTube or a web site, after it's been running for a while. This could actually be something Linux is doing relating to the usage

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

Edward wrote: I have noticed increased memory usage with SeaMonkey, using the Fedora-supplied package, when listening to music either through YouTube or a web site, after it's been running for a while. This could actually be something Linux is doing relating to the usage of memory, because I

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

Original Message EE wrote on 15-08-20 19:21: Lance Courtland wrote: It is with much sadness that I must abandon SeaMonkey as a web browser. I have been a loyal user since Mosaic in 1993, then Netscape Navigator, then SM. However, I have become overwhelmed by the quantity

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

On 2020-08-18, Slugracing wrote: > Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > >> Should I hand you a tissue so that you can whine quietly and in >> private? > > He is telling you he has an issue, just like most of us do. Flipping > him off like that is child like. > > I too have come to a fork in the road and

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Should I hand you a tissue so that you can whine quietly and in private? He is telling you he has an issue, just like most of us do. Flipping him off like that is child like. I too have come to a fork in the road and am now looking to move to another browser. the

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

AndrésH wrote: EE escribió: Lance Courtland wrote: By the way, the website of eldiario.es , a "new" online newspaper in Spain , has recently refurbished its site. And the login process as a user/member of the paper doesn't work in SM 2.53.3. Before the change of the site, everything worked

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

EE escribió: Lance Courtland wrote: It is with much sadness that I must abandon SeaMonkey as a web browser. I have been a loyal user since Mosaic in 1993, then Netscape Navigator, then SM. However, I have become overwhelmed by the quantity and complexity of fixes, tweaks, configs, spoofs, and

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

On 8/16/2020 1:19 PM, EE wrote: Why use Chrome?  It is spyware, and reports where you browse back to Google. I made my default browser Pale Moon, and I like it.  I have other chromium browsers, but not Chrome. If you use Pale Moon you can continue using SeaMonkey. Waste of time if you are

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 16-08-20 01:14: Ray_Net wrote: EE wrote on 15-08-20 19:21: Lance Courtland wrote: Parting is such sweet sorrow. Lance Why use Chrome? Because Chrome works with ZOOM ... and a lot of sites have problem with SM, per example, You can fill a form but the XMIT

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: EE wrote: Lance Courtland wrote: Lance Why use Chrome?  It is spyware, and reports where you browse back to Google. I made my default browser Pale Moon, and I like it.  I have other chromium browsers, but not Chrome. If you use Pale Moon you can continue

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

Ray_Net wrote: EE wrote on 15-08-20 19:21: Lance Courtland wrote: Parting is such sweet sorrow. Lance Why use Chrome? Because Chrome works with ZOOM ... and a lot of sites have problem with SM, per example, You can fill a form but the XMIT button did not work using SM. Should I

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

Lance Courtland wrote on 15-08-20 22:59: Ray_Net wrote: Lance Courtland wrote on 15-08-20 02:27: It is with much sadness that I must abandon SeaMonkey as a web browser. I have been a loyal user since Mosaic in 1993, then Netscape Navigator, then SM. However, I have become overwhelmed by the

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

Ray_Net wrote: Lance Courtland wrote on 15-08-20 02:27: It is with much sadness that I must abandon SeaMonkey as a web browser. I have been a loyal user since Mosaic in 1993, then Netscape Navigator, then SM.  However, I have become overwhelmed by the quantity and complexity of fixes, tweaks,

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

EE wrote on 15-08-20 19:21: Lance Courtland wrote: It is with much sadness that I must abandon SeaMonkey as a web browser. I have been a loyal user since Mosaic in 1993, then Netscape Navigator, then SM. However, I have become overwhelmed by the quantity and complexity of fixes, tweaks,

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

Lance Courtland wrote on 15-08-20 02:27: It is with much sadness that I must abandon SeaMonkey as a web browser. I have been a loyal user since Mosaic in 1993, then Netscape Navigator, then SM.  However, I have become overwhelmed by the quantity and complexity of fixes, tweaks, configs,

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

EE wrote: Lance Courtland wrote: Lance Why use Chrome?  It is spyware, and reports where you browse back to Google. I made my default browser Pale Moon, and I like it.  I have other chromium browsers, but not Chrome. If you use Pale Moon you can continue using SeaMonkey. Waste of

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

Lance Courtland wrote: It is with much sadness that I must abandon SeaMonkey as a web browser. I have been a loyal user since Mosaic in 1993, then Netscape Navigator, then SM.  However, I have become overwhelmed by the quantity and complexity of fixes, tweaks, configs, spoofs, and kluges, each

WHY?????????? -- Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

On 08/14/2020 07:27 PM, Lance Courtland wrote: It is with much sadness that I must abandon SeaMonkey ... I use SeaMonkey 2.49 under Debian with *NO* problems _whatsoever_. I started with Netscape Communicator under whatever flavor of Widoze was current back in the day.

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

've been with this since the Netscape days. When I 'graduated' from Commodore 64 to Windows 95, a good 23 years ago, the first software I downloaded on Windows (although on 56K dial-up back then), was Netscape Communicator. Stayed with that as well as with the Mozilla Suite - which eventually

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

On 2020-08-15, Lance Courtland wrote: > Ken Rudolph wrote: >> Lance Courtland wrote: >>> Ken Rudolph wrote: Lance Courtland wrote: > I will continue to use the Mail & Newsgroup functions, which I > like a lot.  I have managed to make email links clicked in SM > Email open in

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

Ken Rudolph wrote: Lance Courtland wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: Lance Courtland wrote: I will continue to use the Mail & Newsgroup functions, which I like a lot.  I have managed to make email links clicked in SM Email open in Chrome, which is now my default. Could you specify how you

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

Lance Courtland wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: Lance Courtland wrote: I will continue to use the Mail & Newsgroup functions, which I like a lot. I have managed to make email links clicked in SM Email open in Chrome, which is now my default. Could you specify how you managed this feat? I

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

Ken Rudolph wrote: Lance Courtland wrote: I will continue to use the Mail & Newsgroup functions, which I like a lot.  I have managed to make email links clicked in SM Email open in Chrome, which is now my default. Could you specify how you managed this feat?  I would like to have links

Re: Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

Lance Courtland wrote: I will continue to use the Mail & Newsgroup functions, which I like a lot. I have managed to make email links clicked in SM Email open in Chrome, which is now my default. Could you specify how you managed this feat? I would like to have links open in the Firefox

Good bye SeaMonkey Browser

It is with much sadness that I must abandon SeaMonkey as a web browser. I have been a loyal user since Mosaic in 1993, then Netscape Navigator, then SM. However, I have become overwhelmed by the quantity and complexity of fixes, tweaks, configs, spoofs, and kluges, each constantly needing

2.53 autopagerize not work good

I have a autpagerize that work in 2.49. In 2.53 it also work but if load Google scroll down and load page then i switch to other browser tab and return to Google tab it not work anymore. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: A good (free) File Search program ?

Original Message After struggling with this same problem for a long time finally I have found an excellent solution:  it is a smal program named "Everything" from http://www.voidtools.com Light, free and fast, it the best I have ever seen.

Re: A good (free) File Search program ?

After struggling with this same problem for a long time finally I have found an excellent solution: it is a smal program named "Everything" from http://www.voidtools.com Light, free and fast, it the best I have ever seen.

Re: A good (free) File Search program ?

DoctorBill a écrit : I am fed up with Windows 7 "File Search" !  Garbage !  Klunky and Crude. I there a good reliable and FREE disk search program available ? I would appreciate any suggestions. DoctorBill search function in total

Re: A good (free) File Search program ?

On 6/28/2018 11:53 AM, DoctorBill wrote: I am fed up with Windows 7 "File Search" ! Garbage ! Klunky and Crude. I there a good reliable and FREE disk search program available ? I would appreciate any suggestions. DoctorBill I second J. Weaver's suggestion to get Agent Ransack whi

Re: A good (free) File Search program ?

Arnie Goetchius wrote on 29-06-18 16:19: WaltS48 wrote: On 6/28/18 9:31 PM, DoctorBill wrote: WaltS48 wrote: On 6/28/18 5:53 PM, DoctorBill wrote: I am fed up with Windows 7 "File Search" !  Garbage !  Klunky and Crude. I there a good reliable and FREE disk search program avai

Re: A good (free) File Search program ?

WaltS48 wrote: On 6/28/18 9:31 PM, DoctorBill wrote: WaltS48 wrote: On 6/28/18 5:53 PM, DoctorBill wrote: I am fed up with Windows 7 "File Search" !  Garbage !  Klunky and Crude. I there a good reliable and FREE disk search program available ? I would appreciate any s

Re: A good (free) File Search program ?

DoctorBill composed on 2018-06-28 14:53 (UTC-0700): > I am fed up with Windows 7 "File Search" ! Garbage ! Klunky and Crude. > > I there a good reliable and FREE disk search program available ? > > I would appreciate any suggestions. Search function built into any

Re: A good (free) File Search program ?

DoctorBill wrote: I am fed up with Windows 7 "File Search" !  Garbage !  Klunky and Crude. I there a good reliable and FREE disk search program available ? I would appreciate any suggestions. Agent Ransack aka FileLocator Lite. <https://www.mythicso

Re: A good (free) File Search program ?

WaltS48 wrote: > On 6/28/18 9:31 PM, DoctorBill wrote: >> WaltS48 wrote: >>> On 6/28/18 5:53 PM, DoctorBill wrote: >>>> I am fed up with Windows 7 "File Search" !  Garbage !  Klunky and Crude. >>>> >>>> I there a good reliable and F

Re: A good (free) File Search program ?

On 6/28/18 9:31 PM, DoctorBill wrote: WaltS48 wrote: On 6/28/18 5:53 PM, DoctorBill wrote: I am fed up with Windows 7 "File Search" !  Garbage !  Klunky and Crude. I there a good reliable and FREE disk search program available ? I would appreciate any suggestions. DoctorBill

Re: A good (free) File Search program ?

Paul in Houston, TX wrote: DoctorBill wrote: I am fed up with Windows 7 "File Search" !  Garbage !  Klunky and Crude. I there a good reliable and FREE disk search program available ? I would appreciate any suggestions. DoctorBill Everything. Get it directly from it's true h

Re: A good (free) File Search program ?

WaltS48 wrote: On 6/28/18 5:53 PM, DoctorBill wrote: I am fed up with Windows 7 "File Search" !  Garbage !  Klunky and Crude. I there a good reliable and FREE disk search program available ? I would appreciate any suggestions. DoctorBill Windows 10? Windows 7..

Re: A good (free) File Search program ?

On 6/28/18 5:53 PM, DoctorBill wrote: I am fed up with Windows 7 "File Search" !  Garbage !  Klunky and Crude. I there a good reliable and FREE disk search program available ? I would appreciate any suggestions. DoctorBill Windows 10? -- CPU: 3.2 Ghz AMD Athlon(tm) II X3 455 Pro

Re: A good (free) File Search program ?

DoctorBill wrote: I am fed up with Windows 7 "File Search" ! Garbage ! Klunky and Crude. I there a good reliable and FREE disk search program available ? I would appreciate any suggestions. DoctorBill Everything. Get it directly from it's true home: https://www.voi

Re: A good (free) File Search program ?

Mark B wrote: DoctorBill wrote: I am fed up with Windows 7 "File Search" !  Garbage !  Klunky and Crude. I there a good reliable and FREE disk search program available ? I would appreciate any suggestions. DoctorBill I like Everything:  https://everything.en.softonic.com/. It's

Re: A good (free) File Search program ?

DoctorBill wrote: I am fed up with Windows 7 "File Search" !  Garbage !  Klunky and Crude. I there a good reliable and FREE disk search program available ? I would appreciate any suggestions. DoctorBill I like Everything: https://everything.en.softonic.com/. It's free, very fas

A good (free) File Search program ?

I am fed up with Windows 7 "File Search" ! Garbage ! Klunky and Crude. I there a good reliable and FREE disk search program available ? I would appreciate any suggestions. DoctorBill ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support

good music

I am running The Glen Miller & the big band collection 5 038238 20229 (bar code) -- https://facebook.com/gerardjan.vinkesteijn ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Undetactable counterfeit money at good prices (ghostmann9001 (at) gmail (dot) com

WELCOME TO MONEY KINGDOM Emailghostmann9001(at) gmail (dot) com whatsapp:...+2376 95798366 wickr..jurornasas We are the best and Unique producers of HIGH QUALITY Undetectable Counterfeit Banknotes, with over a billion of our products circulating around the world. We supply

Re: Good news for adventurous MAC - SeaMonkey - users ...

John Duncan wrote: EE wrote: Rainer Bielefeld wrote: ... you can find here . Best regards Rainer Exactly where is the Mac release? I could not find it. All I could find was the notice about it.

Re: Good news for adventurous MAC - SeaMonkey - users ...

EE wrote: Rainer Bielefeld wrote: ... you can find here . Best regards Rainer Exactly where is the Mac release? I could not find it. All I could find was the notice about it.

Re: Good news for adventurous MAC - SeaMonkey - users ...

Rainer Bielefeld wrote: ... you can find here . Best regards Rainer Exactly where is the Mac release? I could not find it. All I could find was the notice about it. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: Good news for adventurous MAC - SeaMonkey - users ...

I should have read Adrian's posting above before typing ಠ_ಠ CU Rainer ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Good news for adventurous MAC - SeaMonkey - users ...

... you can find here . Best regards Rainer ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: seamonkey-2.49a2.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2 ... looking good

2.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2 sean Thanks Sean for let us know. I downloaded the win32 version and looks good as well. Luis ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: seamonkey-2.49a2.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2 ... looking good

On 11/22/2016 06:09 PM, Sean wrote: Messing around on an elder Dell tower that I've recently switched from WinXP to dual boot Win7 & PeppermintOS Linux 7. Thought I'd throw the latest Seamonkey on to test... from 11/22 ...

seamonkey-2.49a2.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2 ... looking good

Messing around on an elder Dell tower that I've recently switched from WinXP to dual boot Win7 & PeppermintOS Linux 7. Thought I'd throw the latest Seamonkey on to test... from 11/22 ...

Re: What's a good signature randomizer for 64-bit Windows 7

Ed Mullen wrote: On 10/24/2016 at 10:56 AM, JAS's prodigious digits fired off: Ed Mullen wrote: On 10/23/2016 at 3:21 AM, Ant's prodigious digits fired off: I used to use Pick-a-Tag, but I don't have its installer anymore and it leaks memory. :( Thank you in advance. :) Been using PAT for

Re: What's a good signature randomizer for 64-bit Windows 7

Ed Mullen wrote: On 10/24/2016 at 1:50 PM, Paul B. Gallagher's prodigious digits fired off: Ed Mullen wrote: One file, yes. You could create a new SM profile, one English, one French, and use different tagline files for each. Another possible workaround: Create one file that contains a

Re: What's a good signature randomizer for 64-bit Windows 7

On 10/24/2016 at 1:50 PM, Paul B. Gallagher's prodigious digits fired off: Ed Mullen wrote: One file, yes. You could create a new SM profile, one English, one French, and use different tagline files for each. Another possible workaround: Create one file that contains a 50:50 mix of English

Re: What's a good signature randomizer for 64-bit Windows 7

Ed Mullen wrote: One file, yes. You could create a new SM profile, one English, one French, and use different tagline files for each. Another possible workaround: Create one file that contains a 50:50 mix of English and French taglines. Then when you click "Reply," if you get the wrong

Re: What's a good signature randomizer for 64-bit Windows 7

, but I don't have its installer anymore and it leaks memory. :( Thank you in advance. :) Been using PAT for years. Never seen any memory leakage. <http://edmullen.net/mozilla/moz_sigtag.php> Tagzilla is another: <http://tagzilla.mozdev.org/> Good ideas, but sometime I writ

Re: What's a good signature randomizer for 64-bit Windows 7

. :( Thank you in advance. :) Been using PAT for years. Never seen any memory leakage. <http://edmullen.net/mozilla/moz_sigtag.php> Tagzilla is another: <http://tagzilla.mozdev.org/> Good ideas, but sometime I write in english, and sometime I write in French so in what language is the t

Re: What's a good signature randomizer for 64-bit Windows 7

On 10/24/2016 at 10:56 AM, JAS's prodigious digits fired off: Ed Mullen wrote: On 10/23/2016 at 3:21 AM, Ant's prodigious digits fired off: I used to use Pick-a-Tag, but I don't have its installer anymore and it leaks memory. :( Thank you in advance. :) Been using PAT for years. Never seen

Re: What's a good signature randomizer for 64-bit Windows 7

for years. Never seen any memory leakage. <http://edmullen.net/mozilla/moz_sigtag.php> Tagzilla is another: <http://tagzilla.mozdev.org/> Good ideas, but sometime I write in english, and sometime I write in French so in what language is the tag file list ? :-) I forget how Ta

Re: What's a good signature randomizer for 64-bit Windows 7

Ed Mullen wrote: On 10/23/2016 at 3:21 AM, Ant's prodigious digits fired off: I used to use Pick-a-Tag, but I don't have its installer anymore and it leaks memory. :( Thank you in advance. :) Been using PAT for years. Never seen any memory leakage.

Re: What is a good HTML5 video blocker?

On 10/24/2016 6:18 AM, Daniel wrote: > On 24/10/2016 1:56 AM, David E. Ross wrote: > > >> Oops! I almost forgot the following. >> >> In file user.js in my profile, I inserted: >> user_pref("media.autoplay.enabled", false); >> // in case I forget, disables HTML5 media >> Do not forget

Re: What is a good HTML5 video blocker?

On 24/10/2016 1:56 AM, David E. Ross wrote: Oops! I almost forgot the following. In file user.js in my profile, I inserted: user_pref("media.autoplay.enabled", false); // in case I forget, disables HTML5 media Do not forget to include the semi-colon (;) at the end of the

Re: What's a good signature randomizer for 64-bit Windows 7

net/mozilla/moz_sigtag.php> Tagzilla is another: <http://tagzilla.mozdev.org/> Good ideas, but sometime I write in english, and sometime I write in French so in what language is the tag file list ? :-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list suppo

Re: What's a good signature randomizer for 64-bit Windows 7

On 10/23/2016 1:22 PM, G. Ross wrote: I used to use Pick-a-Tag, but I don't have its installer anymore and it leaks memory. :( Thank you in advance. :) I'm still using RTM. Works for me. What is RTM? URL? Random Tagline Manager http://programs.fbrower.com/ Thanks. :) -- Note: A fixed

Re: What's a good signature randomizer for 64-bit Windows 7

On 10/23/16 1:28 PM, Ant wrote: > On 10/23/2016 9:18 AM, W3BNR wrote: >> On 10/23/16 11:42 AM, Ed Mullen wrote: >>> On 10/23/2016 at 3:21 AM, Ant's prodigious digits fired off: I used to use Pick-a-Tag, but I don't have its installer anymore and it leaks memory. :( Thank you in

Re: What's a good signature randomizer for 64-bit Windows 7

Ant wrote: On 10/23/2016 4:51 AM, G. Ross wrote: Ant wrote: I used to use Pick-a-Tag, but I don't have its installer anymore and it leaks memory. :( Thank you in advance. :) I'm still using RTM. Works for me. What is RTM? URL? Random Tagline Manager http://programs.fbrower.com/ -- GW

Re: What's a good signature randomizer for 64-bit Windows 7

On 10/23/2016 at 1:28 PM, Ant's prodigious digits fired off: On 10/23/2016 9:18 AM, W3BNR wrote: On 10/23/16 11:42 AM, Ed Mullen wrote: On 10/23/2016 at 3:21 AM, Ant's prodigious digits fired off: I used to use Pick-a-Tag, but I don't have its installer anymore and it leaks memory. :( Thank

Re: What is a good HTML5 video blocker?

;> >> Note corrected line above... I must start proofreading before >> posting. >> > Hi again. > > I had a HDD crash so I had to redo my Windows OS, setups, etc. from > scratch. I noticed Prefbar asks for a value in Prefstring's form. What >

Re: What's a good signature randomizer for 64-bit Windows 7

On 10/23/2016 9:18 AM, W3BNR wrote: On 10/23/16 11:42 AM, Ed Mullen wrote: On 10/23/2016 at 3:21 AM, Ant's prodigious digits fired off: I used to use Pick-a-Tag, but I don't have its installer anymore and it leaks memory. :( Thank you in advance. :) Been using PAT for years. Never seen any

Re: What's a good signature randomizer for 64-bit Windows 7

On 10/23/2016 4:51 AM, G. Ross wrote: Ant wrote: I used to use Pick-a-Tag, but I don't have its installer anymore and it leaks memory. :( Thank you in advance. :) I'm still using RTM. Works for me. What is RTM? URL? -- Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see

Re: What's a good signature randomizer for 64-bit Windows 7

On 10/23/16 11:42 AM, Ed Mullen wrote: On 10/23/2016 at 3:21 AM, Ant's prodigious digits fired off: I used to use Pick-a-Tag, but I don't have its installer anymore and it leaks memory. :( Thank you in

Re: What's a good signature randomizer for 64-bit Windows 7

On 10/23/2016 at 3:21 AM, Ant's prodigious digits fired off: I used to use Pick-a-Tag, but I don't have its installer anymore and it leaks memory. :( Thank you in advance. :) Been using PAT for years. Never seen any memory leakage. Tagzilla is

Re: What is a good HTML5 video blocker?

On 10/23/2016 7:53 AM, David E. Ross wrote: > On 10/22/2016 11:48 PM, Ant wrote: >> On 1/8/2014 10:44 AM, W3BNR wrote: >>> On 1/8/2014 11:40 AM W3BNR submitted the following: On 1/8/2014 11:04 AM Ant submitted the following: > On 1/8/2014 6:49 AM PT, Ed typed: > >>> I don't want

Re: What is a good HTML5 video blocker?

On 10/22/2016 11:48 PM, Ant wrote: > On 1/8/2014 10:44 AM, W3BNR wrote: >> On 1/8/2014 11:40 AM W3BNR submitted the following: >>> On 1/8/2014 11:04 AM Ant submitted the following: On 1/8/2014 6:49 AM PT, Ed typed: >> I don't want to use FlashBlock extension again since I dumped it

Re: What's a good signature randomizer for 64-bit Windows 7

Ant wrote: I used to use Pick-a-Tag, but I don't have its installer anymore and it leaks memory. :( Thank you in advance. :) I'm still using RTM. Works for me. -- GW Ross Oxymoron: Random Order. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

What's a good signature randomizer for 64-bit Windows 7

I used to use Pick-a-Tag, but I don't have its installer anymore and it leaks memory. :( Thank you in advance. :) -- Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly. /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\

Re: What is a good HTML5 video blocker?

On 1/8/2014 10:44 AM, W3BNR wrote: On 1/8/2014 11:40 AM W3BNR submitted the following: On 1/8/2014 11:04 AM Ant submitted the following: On 1/8/2014 6:49 AM PT, Ed typed: I don't want to use FlashBlock extension again since I dumped it because both the latest SeaMonkey and Firefox web

Re: Small font displaying poorly on this website, but it looks good in Firefox

i...@opensesamedoor.com wrote: When I look at this website (this is the first time I noticed the problem), the small fonts are distorted. The same site looks fine in Firefox. See this page as an example: https://www.malwarebytes.com/products/ The fonts look fine to me. I am using Mac

  1   2   3   >