Robert Kaiser wrote:
The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.1: The new major release
of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download now! Building on
the same Mozilla platform as Firefox 4, it delivers the latest developments in
web technologies such as HTML5
David E. Ross wrote:
On 6/10/11 8:04 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/10/2011 8:57 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
Has the Update problem noted in bug #662677 been fixed? If not, will it
be fixed soon?
The documentation, I am unsure if it is fixed. But you should not need
to worry about that.
David E. Ross wrote:
On 6/10/11 4:27 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.1: The new major
release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download now!
Building on the same Mozilla platform as Firefox 4, it delivers the
latest developments
On 6/10/11 10:14 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 6/10/11 8:04 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/10/2011 8:57 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
Has the Update problem noted in bug #662677 been fixed? If not, will it
be fixed soon?
The documentation, I am unsure if it is
David E. Ross wrote:
On 6/10/11 10:14 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 6/10/11 8:04 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/10/2011 8:57 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
Has the Update problem noted in bug #662677 been fixed? If not, will it
be fixed soon?
The documentation, I
SeaMonkey 2.1 Release Candidate 2 is now available for free download [1]
on the SeaMonkey website. We encourage testers to get involved [2] in
discussing and reporting problems as well as further improving the product.
SeaMonkey 2.1 RC 2 includes a total of 21 languages, including en-US
on SM 2.1RC1.
BTW, is my UA correct (I've read somewhere that there were problems with
the seamonkey UA and lightning)?
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20110511 Firefox/4.0.1
SeaMonkey/2.1 Lightning/1.0b4pre
--
Francesco
___
support
Francesco Presel wrote:
BTW, is my UA correct (I've read somewhere that there were problems
with the seamonkey UA and lightning)? Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20110511 Firefox/4.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.1
Lightning/1.0b4pre
Yes, this was fixed with the 2011-06-04 Lightning nightly
David E. Ross nobody@nowhere.invalid writes:
#659731 at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659731
I'm sure that preference change one was in the release notes.
-JimC
--
James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
___
On 6/1/11 10:06 AM, James Cloos wrote:
David E. Ross nobody@nowhere.invalid writes:
#659731 at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659731
I'm sure that preference change one was in the release notes.
-JimC
While the fact that zooming is remembered on a site-specific basis is
On 5/29/2011 10:59 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
The major bug reports:
#658936 athttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658936
Fwiw, our handling here is all toolkit, but I don't know enough to delve
deeply on this
#659731 athttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659731
As you
On 5/30/11 7:26 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 5/29/2011 10:59 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
The major bug reports:
#658936 athttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658936
Fwiw, our handling here is all toolkit, but I don't know enough to delve
deeply on this
I updated #658936 to
David E. Ross wrote:
On 5/30/11 7:26 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 5/29/2011 10:59 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
The major bug reports:
#658936 athttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658936
Fwiw, our handling here is all toolkit, but I don't know enough to delve
deeply on this
I
On 5/30/11 8:34 PM, PhillipJones wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 5/30/11 7:26 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 5/29/2011 10:59 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
The major bug reports:
#658936 athttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658936
Fwiw, our handling here is all toolkit, but I don't
.
The problem cited in bug #659731 was caused when the default value of
hidden preference browser.zoom.siteSpecific changed from false to
true with SeaMonkey 2.1. I have closed the bug report.
How many other problems that I am seeing are caused by changed default
values of preference variables?
--
David E
Philip Chee wrote:
Hi!
SeaMonkey 2.1 is almost out of the gate. We need to make sure that the
Lightning version targetting SM 2.1 works well with it. So I need
volunteers to smoke test Lightning 1.04b on SeaMonkey 2.1
Lightning 1.0b4pre builds are here:
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org
WLS wrote:
Seems Lightning 1.0b4pre has broken my UA, preventing me from using
Yahoo! Mail Beta. When Lightning is disabled Yahoo! Mail Beta loads
normally.
I suspected Lightning because I noticed my posts on the MozillaZine
forums only showed Lightning 1.04bpre as my UA instead of the full
Stefan Sitter wrote:
WLS wrote:
Seems Lightning 1.0b4pre has broken my UA, preventing me from using
Yahoo! Mail Beta. When Lightning is disabled Yahoo! Mail Beta loads
normally.
I suspected Lightning because I noticed my posts on the MozillaZine
forums only showed Lightning 1.04bpre as my UA
I have just downloaded SeaMonkey 2.1 RC.
It is fantastic! Very stable (so far). Very easy to set up. I simply
clicked on the SeaMonkey icon and the program checked all my add-ons for
compatibility. Then it froze (although no biggie). After a reboot I
relaunched SeaMonkey and all my previous
:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20110511
Firefox/4.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.1
and in Windows:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20110511 Firefox/4.0.1
SeaMonkey/2.1
I'm not familiar with using RSS within Lightning; search seems to
indicate that it's an add-on?
http
On Sun, 29 May 2011 18:42:48 -0700, NoOp wrote:
On 05/29/2011 03:42 AM, Stefan Sitter wrote:
Stéphane Grégoire wrote:
RSS still worked but I had a very curious bug, my user-agent in
mail, news, about: was correct but the user-agent sent to a web
server was Lightning 1.0b4pre!
Thanks for
On 5/29/11 6:35 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
I have just downloaded SeaMonkey 2.1 RC.
It is fantastic! Very stable (so far). Very easy to set up. I simply
clicked on the SeaMonkey icon and the program checked all my add-ons for
compatibility. Then it froze (although no biggie). After a reboot
On 05/29/2011 07:17 PM, Philip Chee wrote:
On Sun, 29 May 2011 18:42:48 -0700, NoOp wrote:
On 05/29/2011 03:42 AM, Stefan Sitter wrote:
Stéphane Grégoire wrote:
RSS still worked but I had a very curious bug, my user-agent in
mail, news, about: was correct but the user-agent sent to a web
On 26/05/11 11:30, Philip Chee wrote:
Hi!
SeaMonkey 2.1 is almost out of the gate. We need to make sure that the
Lightning version targetting SM 2.1 works well with it. So I need
volunteers to smoke test Lightning 1.04b on SeaMonkey 2.1
Lightning 1.0b4pre builds are here:
https
Philip Chee wrote:
Lightning 1.0b4pre builds are here:
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/nightly/latest-comm-miramar/
SeaMonkey 2.1pre builds are here:
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-2.0/
I'm using Seamonkey 2.1rc1 Linux 64Bit and
//EN
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VEVENT
CREATED:20101214T002658Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20101214T002731Z
DTSTAMP:20101214T002731Z
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20110511
Firefox/4.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.1
and
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.0.1)
Gecko/20110511 Firefox
El 26/05/11 11:30, Philip Chee escribió:
Hi!
SeaMonkey 2.1 is almost out of the gate. We need to make sure that the
Lightning version targetting SM 2.1 works well with it. So I need
volunteers to smoke test Lightning 1.04b on SeaMonkey 2.1
Lightning 1.0b4pre builds are here:
https
Hi!
SeaMonkey 2.1 is almost out of the gate. We need to make sure that the
Lightning version targetting SM 2.1 works well with it. So I need
volunteers to smoke test Lightning 1.04b on SeaMonkey 2.1
Lightning 1.0b4pre builds are here:
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning
Philip Chee schrieb:
Hi!
SeaMonkey 2.1 is almost out of the gate. We need to make sure that the
Lightning version targetting SM 2.1 works well with it. So I need
volunteers to smoke test Lightning 1.04b on SeaMonkey 2.1
...
Hi,
I tried Lightning 1.0b4pre with a German Version of Seamonkey
Philip Chee ha scritto:
Hi!
SeaMonkey 2.1 is almost out of the gate. We need to make sure that the
Lightning version targetting SM 2.1 works well with it. So I need
volunteers to smoke test Lightning 1.04b on SeaMonkey 2.1
Lightning 1.0b4pre builds are here:
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub
will be ported to SeaMonkey 2.1
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636104
- Activating/Deactivating Calendars in the left Pane inside the
Calendar-Window doesn't work or somehow needs the same setting set
by right-clicking on the calendar and activating/deactivating
calendars in the Properties
Francesco Presel wrote:
I have been using the latest-comm-central builds on SM2.1 rc1
(linux x64; I've also used lightning x64), without any problems.
I've noticed, though, that there's no l10n version for lightning
miramar for linux x64 (whereas, there is an English version for linux
x64, and
On Thu, 26 May 2011 13:55:34 +0200, seam...@taz.de wrote:
I tried Lightning 1.0b4pre with a German Version of Seamonkey 2.1 RC1:
- The Settings in the about:addons - Window can't be accessed
(jar:file:///C:/Programme/SeaMonkey/omni.jar!/chrome/messenger/content/messenger/preferences
On 05/26/2011 02:30 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
Hi!
SeaMonkey 2.1 is almost out of the gate. We need to make sure that the
Lightning version targetting SM 2.1 works well with it. So I need
volunteers to smoke test Lightning 1.04b on SeaMonkey 2.1
Lightning 1.0b4pre builds are here:
https
Philip Chee wrote:
Hi!
SeaMonkey 2.1 is almost out of the gate. We need to make sure that the
Lightning version targetting SM 2.1 works well with it. So I need
volunteers to smoke test Lightning 1.04b on SeaMonkey 2.1
Lightning 1.0b4pre builds are here:
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org
NoOp schrieb:
$ memstat -w | grep seamonkey
I think there's a number of blog posts out there that accurately tell
how inaccurate measures like this really are when it comes to what
actual memory is being used. All OSes only give you measures of either
virtual memory or some
On 05/25/2011 05:15 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
NoOp schrieb:
$ memstat -w | grep seamonkey
I think there's a number of blog posts out there that accurately tell
how inaccurate measures like this really are when it comes to what
actual memory is being used. All OSes only give
NoOp schrieb:
memstat lists all accessible processes, executables, and shared
libraries that are using up virtual memory.
The important hing to note here is the last two words: virtual memory.
Processes reserve virtual memory for the chance that they might want to
address that
New in SeaMonkey 2.1
Loading the URL about:memory now shows how much memory is used by
different parts of SeaMonkey.
Now if we can figure out why memstat about:memory have such
considerable differences I'd be happier. :-)
I wonder if Windows and Mac OS X ports have different results too
-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.1/
What's New in SeaMonkey 2.1
Loading the URL about:memory now shows how much memory is used by
different parts of SeaMonkey.
Now if we can figure out why memstat about:memory have such
considerable differences I'd be happier. :-)
I wonder if Windows
On 05/22/2011 10:07 PM, Ant wrote:
Oh, it isn't? It seems excessive to me. :/
Actually, about:memory doesn't jive with memstat. For example
about:memory is currently showing on my system as:
Memory mapped:
479,199,232
Memory in use:
465,726,340
On May 23, 8:48 am, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net.invalid wrote:
On 05/22/2011 10:07 PM, Ant wrote:
Oh, it isn't? It seems excessive to me. :/
Actually, about:memory doesn't jive with memstat. For example
about:memory is currently showing on my system as:
Memory mapped:
Ant wrote:
Interesting. about:memory didn't work in Windows' SeaMonkey v2.0.14
As the subject and NoOp's paths suggest, this only works with SM 2.1 and
later.
HTH
Jens
--
Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/
SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/
New in SeaMonkey 2.1
Loading the URL about:memory now shows how much memory is used by
different parts of SeaMonkey.
Now if we can figure out why memstat about:memory have such
considerable differences I'd be happier. :-)
___
support-seamonkey mailing
On 5/23/2011 4:44 PM PT, NoOp typed:
Interesting. about:memory didn't work in Windows' SeaMonkey v2.0.14
As the subject and NoOp's paths suggest, this only works with SM 2.1 and
later.
Correct.
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.1/
What's New in SeaMonkey 2.1
Loading
On 5/23/2011 2:57 PM PT, Jens Hatlak typed:
Ant wrote:
Interesting. about:memory didn't work in Windows' SeaMonkey v2.0.14
As the subject and NoOp's paths suggest, this only works with SM 2.1 and
later.
Oops! I missed the thread title change in Google Group reader. Sorry.
--
May 10,000
Interviewed by CNN on 13/05/2011 00:12, Justin Wood (Callek) told the world:
SeaMonkey 2.1 Release Candidate 1 is now available for free download [1]
on the SeaMonkey website. We encourage testers to get involved [2] in
discussing and reporting problems as well as further improving the
product
SeaMonkey 2.1 Release Candidate 1 is now available for free download [1]
on the SeaMonkey website. We encourage testers to get involved [2] in
discussing and reporting problems as well as further improving the product.
SeaMonkey 2.1 RC 1 includes a total of 19 languages, including en-US
As of tonight (April 3rd) at Midnight PDT, SeaMonkey will be locked
under string freeze.
I was tempted to spin builds tonight for our b3 with l10nMerge, but I
decided after skimming the l10n dashboard and seeing the number of
strings that landed in our tree this past week (not to mention
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 3/6/2011 9:45 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 3/6/11 6:38 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
David E. Ross schrieb:
I have two questions about bookmarks under SeaMonkey 2.1.
First, I have set my preferences to display my bookmarks as my home
page. With SeaMonkey 2.0.x
I have two questions about bookmarks under SeaMonkey 2.1.
First, I have set my preferences to display my bookmarks as my home
page. With SeaMonkey 2.0.x and earlier, this was easy. I merely
dragged and dropped the file bookmarks.html from my profile into my
browser window. Then I went to [Edit
David E. Ross schrieb:
I have two questions about bookmarks under SeaMonkey 2.1.
First, I have set my preferences to display my bookmarks as my home
page. With SeaMonkey 2.0.x and earlier, this was easy. I merely
dragged and dropped the file bookmarks.html from my profile into my
browser
On 3/6/11 6:38 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
David E. Ross schrieb:
I have two questions about bookmarks under SeaMonkey 2.1.
First, I have set my preferences to display my bookmarks as my home
page. With SeaMonkey 2.0.x and earlier, this was easy. I merely
dragged and dropped the file
On 3/6/2011 9:45 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 3/6/11 6:38 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
David E. Ross schrieb:
I have two questions about bookmarks under SeaMonkey 2.1.
First, I have set my preferences to display my bookmarks as my home
page. With SeaMonkey 2.0.x and earlier, this was easy. I
Hi,
Le 18/02/2011 13:35, Robert Kaiser a écrit:
If it already happened, you should be able to get back your bookmarks at
least by going into the bookmarks manager and restore older bookmarks
from the Tools menu. Or you can try renaming the places.sqlite-corrupt
(or similar) file back to
Hi,
I'm using Seamonkey 2.1 nightly builds but sometimes by mistake I launch
Seamonkey 2.0 and then in Seamonkey 2.1 I have not history and no bookmarks.
How fixing it?
Seamonkey 2.1b3pre mail window look very pretty!
--
Sorry for my bad english, the british dictionnary is disabled
Stéphane Grégoire schrieb:
I'm using Seamonkey 2.1 nightly builds but sometimes by mistake I launch
Seamonkey 2.0 and then in Seamonkey 2.1 I have not history and no bookmarks.
How fixing it?
Make a backup of your profile (which you should always do anyhow), and
esp. your places.sqlite
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
...
Release notes, including Known Issues section:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.1b
Evidently you meant to link:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.1b2/
--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B.
[re-sending as this didn't make it yesterday]
SeaMonkey 2.1 Beta 1 is available for free download now in 8 languages
and makes a huge list of new functionality available to a wider testing
audience for the first time.
Please note that this pre-release version is still intended for testers
Are any of the new features Google-dependent?
May everything associated with Google be stripped from
SM 2.1 without ill-effect?
SeaMonkey 2.1 Beta 1 is available for free download now in 8 languages
and makes a huge list of new functionality available to a wider testing
audience for the first
On 21.10.2010 10:36, d...@kd4e.com wrote:
--- Original Message ---
Are any of the new features Google-dependent?
May everything associated with Google be stripped from
SM 2.1 without ill-effect?
SeaMonkey 2.1 Beta 1 is available for free download now in 8 languages
and makes a huge
d...@kd4e.com schrieb:
Are any of the new features Google-dependent?
No, even though as with the previous search plugin solution, we have the
Google search plugin set as the default, but you can easily set a
different one in the preferences, just like before - just that the
selection of
[Mostly resending with slight corrections to cover support and L10n
groups as well with this message - this is a localized beta after all]
Hi,
The SeaMonkey team is getting closer to the next major release - and
SeaMonkey 2.1 Beta 1 has the vast majority of the expected big changes
done
SeaMonkey 2.1 Alpha 3 marks a third preview milestone on the way to the
future of Mozilla's SeaMonkey Internet suite and is now available for
free download. Please note that this pre-release version is still
intended for developers and testers only. As always, we appreciate any
feedback you
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Daniel schrieb:
Daniel wrote:
However, it appears I've got no Add-On Manager!!
And now I see that I have three copies of the Add-On Manager in tabs of
the Browser.
Yes, in 2.1a2, we have one bug that makes us open multiple copies of it,
and another that makes it
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Daniel schrieb:
Daniel wrote:
However, it appears I've got no Add-On Manager!!
And now I see that I have three copies of the Add-On Manager in tabs of
the Browser.
Yes, in 2.1a2, we have one bug that makes us open multiple copies of it,
and another that makes it appear
Adam Jimerson wrote:
Adam Jimerson wrote:
I just installed SeaMonkey 2.1 Alpha 2 and noticed that the icon and
Settings option for Chatzilla is gone? Did this get removed from
SeaMonkey? If so any reason it was removed?
Never mind checking the Add-on page shows that it is installed
Daniel wrote:
Adam Jimerson wrote:
Adam Jimerson wrote:
I just installed SeaMonkey 2.1 Alpha 2 and noticed that the icon and
Settings option for Chatzilla is gone? Did this get removed from
SeaMonkey? If so any reason it was removed?
Never mind checking the Add-on page shows
Daniel schrieb:
Daniel wrote:
However, it appears I've got no Add-On Manager!!
And now I see that I have three copies of the Add-On Manager in tabs of
the Browser.
Yes, in 2.1a2, we have one bug that makes us open multiple copies of it,
and another that makes it appear in the background
I just installed SeaMonkey 2.1 Alpha 2 and noticed that the icon and
Settings option for Chatzilla is gone? Did this get removed from
SeaMonkey? If so any reason it was removed?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Adam Jimerson wrote:
I just installed SeaMonkey 2.1 Alpha 2 and noticed that the icon and
Settings option for Chatzilla is gone? Did this get removed from
SeaMonkey? If so any reason it was removed?
Never mind checking the Add-on page shows that it is installed but
disabled because
NoOp schrieb:
What seems to be the primary issue with gecko 1.9.2?
Not sure what you mean - other than the arbitrary decision we made in
the SeaMonkey team to not release a SeaMonkey version on top of it but
concentrate on aligning our releases with those of Firefox better by
concentrating
Ed Mullen schrieb:
If I wanted to try the 2.1 alpha what are the caveats installing it on a
system that has the 2.0.6 Release on it?
Yes, I've got good backups of my profiles but I'm interested in the best
practice for installing (and using) both versions on the same system.
What about profile
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ed Mullen schrieb:
If I wanted to try the 2.1 alpha what are the caveats installing it on a
system that has the 2.0.6 Release on it?
Yes, I've got good backups of my profiles but I'm interested in the best
practice for installing (and using) both versions on the same
On 08/05/2010 07:44 PM, Ed Mullen wrote:
If I wanted to try the 2.1 alpha what are the caveats installing it on a
system that has the 2.0.6 Release on it?
Yes, I've got good backups of my profiles but I'm interested in the best
practice for installing (and using) both versions on the same
NoOp schrieb:
If you use calendar (lightning) in 2.0.6, back up your entire 2.0.6
mozilla folder and use a *different* profile for 2.1x. The calendar data
is not compatible 2.1x will screw up your 2.0.6 data.
Well, there is no Lighting add-on that works with 2.1 alphas anyhow -
unless you
On 08/06/2010 05:43 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
NoOp schrieb:
If you use calendar (lightning) in 2.0.6, back up your entire 2.0.6
mozilla folder and use a *different* profile for 2.1x. The calendar data
is not compatible 2.1x will screw up your 2.0.6 data.
Well, there is no Lighting add-on
If I wanted to try the 2.1 alpha what are the caveats installing it on a
system that has the 2.0.6 Release on it?
Yes, I've got good backups of my profiles but I'm interested in the best
practice for installing (and using) both versions on the same system.
What about profile import?
Any
SeaMonkey 2.1 Alpha 2, the second preview milestone on the way to the
future of Mozilla's SeaMonkey Internet suite, is now available for free
download. Please note that this pre-release version is still intended
for developers and testers only. As always, we appreciate any feedback
you may
in mozilla.support.seamonkey at all?
Point being is that posting an hit run annoucement such as SeaMonkey
2.1 Alpha 1 Available in this group then complaining about comments
added here is nonsense.
There is *nothing* in the OP about only making comments in
mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey. In fact the OP
Jay Garcia wrote:
On 19.05.2010 20:40, NoOp wrote:
--- Original Message ---
On 05/19/2010 06:11 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
NoOp schrieb:
Then why post an announcement in mozilla.support.seamonkey at all?
Because we want users to be aware that we're working on new things, and
we also want to
NoOp schrieb:
Then post that in your msg to this group. Pretty simple eh?
[...]
Fix your attitude, fix your announcements, or preferably both Robert.
Let's not split hairs but work together for a better SeaMonkey, OK?
--
Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never
Does anyone know if Seamonkey 2.1 will be getting the 'private browsing'
feature available to Firefox, Chrome and Internet Explorer?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support
Vtr schrieb:
Does anyone know if Seamonkey 2.1 will be getting the 'private browsing'
feature available to Firefox, Chrome and Internet Explorer?
Only if someone volunteers to work on it.
Robert Kaiser
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support
On 05/20/2010 06:19 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
NoOp schrieb:
Then post that in your msg to this group. Pretty simple eh?
[...]
Fix your attitude, fix your announcements, or preferably both Robert.
Let's not split hairs but work together for a better SeaMonkey, OK?
OK. Peace :-)
On 19.05.2010 23:09, NoOp wrote:
--- Original Message ---
BTW Jay, have you installed/tested 2.1a? When was the last time you
tested pre/alpha/beta/rc releases?
Every pre/alpha/beta/rc since Communicator 4.0a1 (the first pre-alpha),
which btw was a disaster area, computer rebooted all by
I have re-posted this one here because it has a follow-up elsewhere
Robert Kaiser wrote:
SeaMonkey 2.1 Alpha 1, a first preview of functionality in work for
SeaMonkey's future is available for free download.
What about going from 1.X to 2.1 - is a migration action at first run of
2.1
Robert Kaiser wrote:
NoOp schrieb:
Sorry meant for this to go to the users group:
This is a development version not intended for wide use by normal users,
that's why I directed followups on the development group.
Please be aware that many add-ons may not work w/2.1x.
This is a
In news:mtsdnahgitnuz2nwnz2dnuvz_radn...@mozilla.org,
NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net.invalid wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
NoOp schrieb:
Sorry meant for this to go to the users group:
This is a development version not intended for wide use by normal
users, that's why I directed followups on
NoOp schrieb:
Then why post an announcement in mozilla.support.seamonkey at all?
Because we want users to be aware that we're working on new things, and
we also want to gain new testers - but we want them to discuss their
findings from testing in the dev group once they join the testing
On 05/19/2010 08:10 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 5/19/2010 9:40 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 05/19/2010 06:11 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
NoOp schrieb:
Then why post an announcement in mozilla.support.seamonkey at all?
Because we want users to be aware that we're working on new things, and
we also
On 19.05.2010 20:11, Robert Kaiser wrote:
--- Original Message ---
NoOp schrieb:
Then why post an announcement in mozilla.support.seamonkey at all?
Because we want users to be aware that we're working on new things, and
we also want to gain new testers - but we want them to discuss their
On 19.05.2010 20:40, NoOp wrote:
--- Original Message ---
On 05/19/2010 06:11 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
NoOp schrieb:
Then why post an announcement in mozilla.support.seamonkey at all?
Because we want users to be aware that we're working on new things, and
we also want to gain new
that people would know there's alpha testing to be done and know
where discussion is taking place in case they're considering
participating.
Point being is that posting an hit run annoucement such as
SeaMonkey 2.1 Alpha 1 Available in this group then complaining
about comments added here
On 05/19/2010 08:47 PM, Jay Garcia wrote:
On 19.05.2010 20:11, Robert Kaiser wrote:
--- Original Message ---
NoOp schrieb:
Then why post an announcement in mozilla.support.seamonkey at all?
Because we want users to be aware that we're working on new things, and
we also want to gain
SeaMonkey 2.1 Alpha 1, a first preview of functionality in work for
SeaMonkey's future is available for free download. Please note that this
pre-release version is intended for developers and testers only. As
always, we appreciate any feedback you may have and encourage users to
help us
On 05/18/2010 12:37 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
SeaMonkey 2.1 Alpha 1, a first preview of functionality in work for
SeaMonkey's future is available for free download. Please note that this
pre-release version is intended for developers and testers only. As
always, we appreciate any feedback
Benoit Renard wrote:
snip
There's no need to save the program folder. You can just reinstall
SeaMonkey from the installer.
I disagree. If you do not, chances are you will lose most of the add-ons
you installed.
--
John Doue
___
support-seamonkey
the move go more smoothly. Any
comments would be appreciated.
You may want to wait for some minor release, e.g. SeaMonkey 2.0.1 or
2.0.2. You should not wait for SeaMonkey 2.1, though, since that one
will probably give a worse migration experience (AFAIK the ability to
migrate download history
Ant wrote:
Is there an ETA for the next version (minor or major)?
Minor: Next month I'd say (KaiRo is on vacation until the 29th). Major:
No ETA whatsoever.
HTH
Jens
--
Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/
SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/
301 - 400 of 406 matches
Mail list logo
