Bill Davidsen schrieb:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Bill Davidsen schrieb:
From my testing of 2.1 I would say that a clear spec of how to write
conforming extensions, possibly with some trivial example, is desirable.
Feel free to write one up, we are an open community. We are trying to
write up and
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Bill Davidsen schrieb:
Robert, I agree with the should never break part, but in practice
2.0.7 had major issue for some people and worked poorly or not at all.
I didn't have any issue with add-ons, and that is the topic here. The
other one was unfortunate and most of
Robert Kaiser wrote:
MintyJewel schrieb:
Can you please explain ( to confused little me ) why there are so many
massive overhauls?
The updates that get applied automatically are only security and
stability fixes, not massive overhauls. Those should never break
anything, and any add-ons from
Bill Davidsen schrieb:
Robert, I agree with the should never break part, but in practice
2.0.7 had major issue for some people and worked poorly or not at all.
I didn't have any issue with add-ons, and that is the topic here. The
other one was unfortunate and most of those were an older
On 9/25/2010 11:25 AM Robert Kaiser wrote:
Bill Davidsen schrieb:
Robert, I agree with the should never break part, but in practice
2.0.7 had major issue for some people and worked poorly or not at all.
I didn't have any issue with add-ons, and that is the topic here. The
other one was
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:55:41 -0400, W3BNR wrote:
On 9/25/2010 11:25 AM Robert Kaiser wrote:
Bill Davidsen schrieb:
Robert, I agree with the should never break part, but in practice
2.0.7 had major issue for some people and worked poorly or not at all.
I didn't have any issue with add-ons,
MintyJewel schrieb:
Can you please explain ( to confused little me ) why there are so many
massive overhauls?
The updates that get applied automatically are only security and
stability fixes, not massive overhauls. Those should never break
anything, and any add-ons from the official
Robert Kaiser wrote:
MintyJewel schrieb:
Can you please explain ( to confused little me ) why there are so many
massive overhauls?
The updates that get applied automatically are only security and
stability fixes, not massive overhauls. Those should never break
anything, and any add-ons from
Phillip Jones schrieb:
I've seen twice recently where SeaMonkey installed totally new
application not just patched current install.
both on 2.0.5 and 2.0.7
Both those have just stability and security changes over their
predecessors. The way it's installed doesn't way anything to do with
Dear Team SeaMonkey ...
Can you please explain ( to confused little me ) why there are so many
massive overhauls? Seems as though I've barely settled in nice and
comfy with the latest SeaMonkey version, that I'm hit with an up-
grade.
Only it's never so simple. Add-On's no longer work, things
On 9/21/10 7:24 PM, MintyJewel wrote:
Dear Team SeaMonkey ...
Can you please explain ( to confused little me ) why there are so many
massive overhauls? Seems as though I've barely settled in nice and
comfy with the latest SeaMonkey version, that I'm hit with an up-
grade.
Only it's never
11 matches
Mail list logo
