Re: Website problems

2009-11-22 Thread Cedar
Would somebody mind telling me what this browser sniffing thing is all about? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: RoboForm adapter will not install in Seamonkey 2.0

2009-11-22 Thread John Doue
Serge Popper wrote: When attempting to install the RoboForm adapter, which worked fine in 1.18, the following message was displayed - Incompatible Extension. AI RoboForm Toolbar for Seamonkey will not be installed because it does not provide secure up dadates. I went into

Re: Is there a 64 bit version of SeaMonkey 2.0 available for MS Windows 7 ?

2009-11-22 Thread Edward
The 64-bit SM 2.0.1pre mentioned above, is working with 64-bit Linux, as is the 64-bit Flash plugin. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Location of SM 2.0 profile under Windows Vista

2009-11-22 Thread Edward
Edward wrote: I need to copy the address book and bookmarks file into a new SM 2.0 installation under Windows Vista Home Premium, but do not know where the location of the profile is under Vista. Seems to be a different animal compared to XP and earlier versions, not even a My Computer icon on

Re: mail problem

2009-11-22 Thread intrudere
On 21 nov, 21:02, Norvin bluego...@prodigy.spam.net wrote: Using SM 1.1.18 and XP home and for the past few days I have been getting the following message when trying get my mail: could not connect to server pop.att.yahoo.com the connection was refused. This will happen for a short period of

Re: Filter Problem

2009-11-22 Thread Smiles
Neil Marcus wrote: I'm using Seamonkey 1.1.18 on a Windows XP Pro system. I have set up several filters, and all of a sudden, after working forever, I'm getting an error message asking if: 1) I have 'rights' to the disk; and 2) asking if the disk is full. 1st of all, I'm logged in as the

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE

2009-11-22 Thread NoOp
On 11/21/2009 04:59 PM, Bush wrote: ... Had to go back port 110 None SSL Talking to the Gateway at http://192.168.1.254/ I see nothing wrong with the Built-in Firewall All settings are correct . This might be of interest suggests that the problem may have been (what else?) the ATT

Re: Website problems

2009-11-22 Thread David E. Ross
On 11/22/2009 12:10 AM, Cedar wrote: Would somebody mind telling me what this browser sniffing thing is all about? See my http://www.rossde.com/internet/Webdevelopers.html#sniff. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ Go to Mozdev at http://www.mozdev.org/ for quick access to extensions

Re: Website problems

2009-11-22 Thread NoOp
On 11/22/2009 08:55 AM, David E. Ross wrote: On 11/22/2009 12:10 AM, Cedar wrote: Would somebody mind telling me what this browser sniffing thing is all about? See my http://www.rossde.com/internet/Webdevelopers.html#sniff. @Cedar: And to modify your UA: In the address bar, type in:

Re: Website problems

2009-11-22 Thread Benoit Renard
David E. Ross wrote: The page has 762 XHTML errors and 9 (or more) CSS errors. While many different browsers are designed to attempt to render pages containing errors, there are limits beyond which such attempts cannot succeed. They are designed to make such attempts if the pages are HTML.

Re: RoboForm adapter will not install in Seamonkey 2.0

2009-11-22 Thread Serge Popper
John Doue wrote: Serge Popper wrote: When attempting to install the RoboForm adapter, which worked fine in 1.18, the following message was displayed - Incompatible Extension. AI RoboForm Toolbar for Seamonkey will not be installed because it does not provide secure up dadates. I went into

Re: Website problems

2009-11-22 Thread Benoit Renard
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Hard to know /what/ this is -- an embedded graphic in the XHTML code??? input type=hidden name=__VIEWSTATE id=__VIEWSTATE value= [51,256 characters of alphabet soup snipped] / Hell, it took IE four minutes just to /display/ all this crap in Notepad. It's ASP state

Re: RoboForm adapter will not install in Seamonkey 2.0

2009-11-22 Thread Serge Popper
Leonidas Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Serge Popper wrote: When attempting to install the RoboForm adapter, which worked fine in 1.18, the following message was displayed - Incompatible Extension. AI RoboForm Toolbar for Seamonkey will not be installed because it does not provide secure

click on next unread page doesn't necessarily do so

2009-11-22 Thread Phillip Jones
When reading emails (I have multiple sub folders in my email Boxes) and news groups when I click on the*next Button (next unread message) it goes to to next folder and in fact a out line shows around topic but is no highlighted an no message shows up. IN SM1.x click next would actually switch

Re: Website problems

2009-11-22 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Benoit Renard wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Hard to know /what/ this is -- an embedded graphic in the XHTML code??? input type=hidden name=__VIEWSTATE id=__VIEWSTATE value= [51,256 characters of alphabet soup snipped] / Hell, it took IE four minutes just to /display/ all this crap in

Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread Bush
Well today SSL works on all my computers . Very Very Strange... Tech suport says Mozilla products cannot use SSL on att yahoo servers ,,, I do a few Newsgroup Postings, And All of a Sudden SSL works with Seamonkey . Very Very Strange unless Tach support Read Newsgroups Has everyone else

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread NoOp
On 11/22/2009 12:11 PM, Bush wrote: Well today SSL works on all my computers . Very Very Strange... Tech suport says Mozilla products cannot use SSL on att yahoo servers ,,, I do a few Newsgroup Postings, And All of a Sudden SSL works with Seamonkey . Very Very Strange unless Tach

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread Bush
NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 12:11 PM, Bush wrote: Well today SSL works on all my computers . Very Very Strange... Tech suport says Mozilla products cannot use SSL on att yahoo servers ,,, I do a few Newsgroup Postings, And All of a Sudden SSL works with Seamonkey . Very Very Strange unless

Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18

2009-11-22 Thread NoOp
On 11/21/2009 08:56 AM, Philip Chee wrote: On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:36:54 +0100, Hartmut Figge wrote: D. K. Kraft: Harmut, does one need the -no-remote parameter on both the 1.1.18 and the 2.0 shortcuts? Or does it suffice just to have it on the 2.0 shortcut? I haven't tested this. When i

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread NoOp
On 11/22/2009 12:19 PM, Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 12:11 PM, Bush wrote: Well today SSL works on all my computers . Very Very Strange... Tech suport says Mozilla products cannot use SSL on att yahoo servers ,,, I do a few Newsgroup Postings, And All of a Sudden SSL works with

Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18

2009-11-22 Thread NoOp
On 11/22/2009 01:25 PM, NoOp wrote: ... Actually, you might want to check again... '-no-noremote' works just fine for me on Win2KPro in both 1.1.18 2.0. That is how I test both in Windows via a VM (VirtualBox) at the same time so that I can easily compare. Sorry: should be '-no-remote'

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread Bush
NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 12:19 PM, Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 12:11 PM, Bush wrote: Well today SSL works on all my computers . Very Very Strange... Tech suport says Mozilla products cannot use SSL on att yahoo servers ,,, I do a few Newsgroup Postings, And All of a Sudden SSL

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread Bush
NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 12:19 PM, Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 12:11 PM, Bush wrote: Well today SSL works on all my computers . Very Very Strange... Tech suport says Mozilla products cannot use SSL on att yahoo servers ,,, I do a few Newsgroup Postings, And All of a Sudden SSL

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread Lee
Bush wrote: Has everyone else on Att Who reported that ssl port 995 doesnot work on att Suddenly get SSL back?. Well it works for me after all those earlier problems. -- Lee (in Florida)US Army Retired Georgie Boy Cruise Master Logitech Vid Skype lee.g.bray

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread Bush
Lee wrote: Bush wrote: Has everyone else on Att Who reported that ssl port 995 doesnot work on att Suddenly get SSL back?. Well it works for me after all those earlier problems. My question is WHY did ATT Tech Support LIE to Me . ___

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread Bush
Bush wrote: Lee wrote: Bush wrote: Has everyone else on Att Who reported that ssl port 995 doesnot work on att Suddenly get SSL back?. Well it works for me after all those earlier problems. My question is WHY did ATT Tech Support LIE to Me . Forgot to Add .. Tech Support Said it Was a

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread NoOp
On 11/22/2009 01:45 PM, Bush wrote: Lee wrote: Bush wrote: Has everyone else on Att Who reported that ssl port 995 doesnot work on att Suddenly get SSL back?. Well it works for me after all those earlier problems. My question is WHY did ATT Tech Support LIE to Me . You're joking... right?

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread NoOp
On 11/22/2009 01:35 PM, Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: ... You might want to hang out here for awhile: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/uverse But seriously... Your post were the only post that Were Blank in the message area . post from others were Fine . Wouldn't be the first time that I shot

Seamonky on win7 computer

2009-11-22 Thread user
I installed seamonky 2 on a computer with win7 on it. I would like to copy the mozilla folder in the documents and settings\user\ folder. But on windows7 it dosnt have a documents and settings folder anymore. Where do I put the mozilla folder on win7 so I can keep all my bookmarks and my email

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread Lee
Bush wrote: My question is WHY did ATT Tech Support LIE to Me . Probably like mine who did not know what in the heck was going on much less of any help. -- Lee (in Florida)US Army Retired Georgie Boy Cruise Master Logitech Vid Skype lee.g.bray

Re: Is there a 64 bit version of SeaMonkey 2.0 available for MS Windows 7 ?

2009-11-22 Thread NoOp
On 11/22/2009 04:03 AM, Edward wrote: The 64-bit SM 2.0.1pre mentioned above, is working with 64-bit Linux, as is the 64-bit Flash plugin. Cool... now if we could just get an 'official' 2.0 build 64bit'ers would be happy. ___ support-seamonkey

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread Bush
Lee wrote: Bush wrote: My question is WHY did ATT Tech Support LIE to Me . Probably like mine who did not know what in the heck was going on much less of any help. Took me to Web mail... and it Worked so they Said it was not their problem since Webmail worked .. pop.att.yahoo.com ...

Seamonky on win7 computer

2009-11-22 Thread user
I installed seamonky 2 on a computer with win7 on it. I would like to copy the mozilla folder in the documents and settings\user\application folder. But on windows7 it dosnt have a documents and settings folder anymore. Where do I put the mozilla folder on win7 so I can keep all my bookmarks

Re: Seamonky on win7 computer

2009-11-22 Thread Bush
u...@domain.invalid wrote: I installed seamonky 2 on a computer with win7 on it. I would like to copy the mozilla folder in the documents and settings\user\ folder. But on windows7 it dosnt have a documents and settings folder anymore. Where do I put the mozilla folder on win7 so I can keep all

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Bush wrote: Well today SSL works on all my computers . Very Very Strange... Tech suport says Mozilla products cannot use SSL on att yahoo servers ,,, I do a few Newsgroup Postings, And All of a Sudden SSL works with Seamonkey . Very Very Strange unless Tach support Read Newsgroups Has

Use Seamonkey as mail client and Firefox as browser

2009-11-22 Thread Serge Popper
When using Seamonkey as mail client, and clicking on URL in an email, the URL invariably opens in Seamonkey Browser - even when Seamonkey is not the default browser. Is there a way to open the URL's, which were sent in email to my Seamonkey email client, in Firefox? Thanks, Serge

Re: Send Link and Word Wrap in SM2

2009-11-22 Thread NoOp
On 11/21/2009 02:12 PM, art wrote: On 11/21/09 5:02 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: .. The wrap is only visual. If you observe the source of the message you'll see the link text is continuous. Copying and pasting it in a simple plain text editor should also show the text is not broken. The

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread NoOp
On 11/22/2009 12:19 PM, Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 12:11 PM, Bush wrote: Well today SSL works on all my computers . Very Very Strange... Tech suport says Mozilla products cannot use SSL on att yahoo servers ,,, I do a few Newsgroup Postings, And All of a Sudden SSL works with

Re: click on next unread page doesn't necessarily do so

2009-11-22 Thread Martin Freitag
Phillip Jones schrieb: When reading emails (I have multiple sub folders in my email Boxes) and news groups when I click on the*next Button (next unread message) it goes to to next folder and in fact a out line shows around topic but is no highlighted an no message shows up. IN SM1.x click next

Re: Have downloaded and installed SM2 as advised by Leonidas Jones

2009-11-22 Thread Martin Freitag
John Boyle schrieb: So, I have bitten the bullet, now I need to know how do I manually move Bookmarks, email and newsgroups to SM2,or should I wait until the first fix comes out next month? http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_migration_-_SeaMonkey -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html

Re: IETab.dll in Win 7?

2009-11-22 Thread Martin Freitag
Tom Pamin schrieb: I can't get the ietab.dll plugin to work with 1.18 and Windows 7 64-bit. Any advice? Use SM2 and http://coralietab.mozdev.org/installation.html (SeaMonkey 2 Users: try v1.69.20091026(EXPERIMENTAL)) regards Martin -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\

Re: SM 2.0 Can't Get Email, But Can Send Email

2009-11-22 Thread Martin Freitag
u...@domain.invalid schrieb: Anyone have any ideas? Create a new profile for SM2 and test again. -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - http://www.gerstbach.at/2004/ascii ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread Bush
Hartmut Figge wrote: NoOp: On 11/22/2009 12:19 PM, Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: Perhaps you missed my post this morning on Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE? most of your post this morning Were a Blank Page .. No info what so ever . That may sometimes happen when you try to load a msg the news

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread Bush
NoOp wrote: This post was Blank ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread Bush
NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 04:14 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: NoOp: On 11/22/2009 12:19 PM, Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: Perhaps you missed my post this morning on Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE? most of your post this morning Were a Blank Page .. No info what so ever . That may sometimes happen

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread Bush
Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 04:14 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: NoOp: On 11/22/2009 12:19 PM, Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: Perhaps you missed my post this morning on Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE? most of your post this morning Were a Blank Page .. No info what so ever . That may

Re: click on next unread page doesn't necessarily do so

2009-11-22 Thread Phillip Jones
Martin Freitag wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: When reading emails (I have multiple sub folders in my email Boxes) and news groups when I click on the*next Button (next unread message) it goes to to next folder and in fact a out line shows around topic but is no highlighted an no message shows

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread NoOp
On 11/22/2009 05:04 PM, Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: This post was Blank What post? Your headers show no reference header: Path: Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.mozilla.org!news.mozilla.org.POSTED!not-for-mail

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread Bush
NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 05:04 PM, Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: This post was Blank What post? Your headers show no reference header: Path:

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread Hartmut Figge
Bush: Is anyone else seeing Blank post from NoOp ? hope we get a few answers to see who is Cracking up.. u or Me ? Try Preferences-Advanced-Cache-Clear Cache, then select another posting and then go back to the one without body. Does this help? Hartmut

Re: click on next unread page doesn't necessarily do so

2009-11-22 Thread Phillip Jones
Phillip Jones wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: When reading emails (I have multiple sub folders in my email Boxes) and news groups when I click on the*next Button (next unread message) it goes to to next folder and in fact a out line shows around topic but is no highlighted

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread NoOp
On 11/22/2009 05:49 PM, Bush wrote: Bush wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Bush: Is anyone else seeing Blank post from NoOp ? hope we get a few answers to see who is Cracking up.. u or Me ? Try Preferences-Advanced-Cache-Clear Cache, then select another posting and then go back to the one

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread NoOp
On 11/22/2009 05:47 PM, Bush wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Bush: Is anyone else seeing Blank post from NoOp ? hope we get a few answers to see who is Cracking up.. u or Me ? Try Preferences-Advanced-Cache-Clear Cache, then select another posting and then go back to the one without body.

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread Hartmut Figge
NoOp: On 11/22/2009 05:49 PM, Bush wrote: Bush wrote: I already Cleared my Cache. But only some NoOp post from him are Blank.. No one else's post are Blank.. in this Group or in other groups. I see we Both are on ATT And that matters how? I am writing this in case he cannot read your

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread Hartmut Figge
NoOp: http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey/browse_thread/thread/84ed3b9207cb82ec/77ba408f1014409d?hl=enlnk=gstq=Att%2FSeamonkey%2Fssl++-+UPDATE#77ba408f1014409d Using ' instead of helps.

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Bush wrote: Sorry But I am not sending the Blank post from NoOp only some post from you are Blank.. all other post from others in this newsgroup has Text in the message box . Is anyone else seeing Blank post from NoOp ? hope we get a few answers to see who is Cracking up.. u or Me ? I

Re: click on next unread page doesn't necessarily do so

2009-11-22 Thread Leonidas Jones
Phillip Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: When reading emails (I have multiple sub folders in my email Boxes) and news groups when I click on the*next Button (next unread message) it goes to to next folder and in fact a out line shows around topic

Re: click on next unread page doesn't necessarily do so

2009-11-22 Thread Phillip Jones
Phillip Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: When reading emails (I have multiple sub folders in my email Boxes) and news groups when I click on the*next Button (next unread message) it goes to to next folder and in fact a out line shows around topic

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread Leonidas Jones
Bush wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Bush: Is anyone else seeing Blank post from NoOp ? hope we get a few answers to see who is Cracking up.. u or Me ? Try Preferences-Advanced-Cache-Clear Cache, then select another posting and then go back to the one without body. Does this help? Hartmut I

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread Bush
Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Bush: Is anyone else seeing Blank post from NoOp ? hope we get a few answers to see who is Cracking up.. u or Me ? Try Preferences-Advanced-Cache-Clear Cache, then select another posting and then go back to the one without body. Does

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread Bush
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Bush wrote: Sorry But I am not sending the Blank post from NoOp only some post from you are Blank.. all other post from others in this newsgroup has Text in the message box . Is anyone else seeing Blank post from NoOp ? hope we get a few answers to see who is

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread Bush
Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Bush: Is anyone else seeing Blank post from NoOp ? hope we get a few answers to see who is Cracking up.. u or Me ? Try Preferences-Advanced-Cache-Clear Cache, then select another posting and then go back to the one without body. Does

Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl

2009-11-22 Thread Hartmut Figge
Bush: I just unsubscribed to this Group, Then re subscribed and Now I can see his all the post From him. No Blank posts . Hm. Then the .msf wasn't guilty. Must have been the newsrc for the NG. Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: click on next unread page doesn't necessarily do so

2009-11-22 Thread Phillip Jones
Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Phillip Jones schrieb: When reading emails (I have multiple sub folders in my email Boxes) and news groups when I click on the*next Button (next unread message) it goes to to next folder and in fact a out

Re: Use Seamonkey as mail client and Firefox as browser

2009-11-22 Thread Serge Popper
Martin Freitag wrote: Serge Popper schrieb: When using Seamonkey as mail client, and clicking on URL in an email, the URL invariably opens in Seamonkey Browser - even when Seamonkey is not the default browser. Is there a way to open the URL's, which were sent in email to my Seamonkey email

Re: Use Seamonkey as mail client and Firefox as browser

2009-11-22 Thread Serge Popper
Leonidas Jones wrote: Serge Popper wrote: When using Seamonkey as mail client, and clicking on URL in an email, the URL invariably opens in Seamonkey Browser - even when Seamonkey is not the default browser. Is there a way to open the URL's, which were sent in email to my Seamonkey email

Re: Website problems

2009-11-22 Thread Cedar
Wow! You guys are fantastic! That actually workedI can even click on the e-mail newsletter links and get there now! Holy Cow! (haha) But now, should I leave this new string in about:config permanently? Are there any possible circumstance/websites where this change may cause problems?