Re: default browser problem

2009-12-20 Thread user
jim wrote: XP, SP2 Seamonkey 2.0.1 IE 8 On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:58:48 -0500, jim j...@earthlink.com in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote: On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:21:17 -0700, Jim no_...@anonymouse.org in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote: jim wrote: On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:59:51 -0700,

Re: SM2 - customize toolbar ??

2009-12-20 Thread Philip Chee
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:53:34 +0100, gNeandr wrote: Gecko/20090223 SeaMonkey/2.0a3 .^^^ * and NO menu popup with the compose window. You are using an alpha. Think about it Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com

Re: Receive pictures in body of email

2009-12-20 Thread BeeNeR
On or about 12/20/2009 1:40 AM, Mike C typed the following: When someone sends me a picture or a small gif file in the body of an email I only receive it as an attachment. How do I get to receive it in the body of the email like it was sent? Mike C Click on 'VIEW' and then click on

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

2009-12-20 Thread Daniel
Philip Chee wrote: On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:10:03 -0800, Rufus wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:33:15 -0800, Rufus wrote: Yes, but the interface options/functionality between the two is different - most notably in that I can drag and drop Account/NG order in TB, and I can't in

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

2009-12-20 Thread Philip Chee
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:57:54 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote: since I am a user I would have no standing with him a developer, nor would I have the funds to pay him to do it. So I guess will have to make do until he gets tired of maintaining it. You don't seem to be able to grasp the concept

Re: Strange issue with email/newspost

2009-12-20 Thread Daniel
Hartmut Figge wrote: Ant: On 12/19/2009 4:13 AM PT, Hartmut Figge typed: Exactly Ditto for me, too! AOL AOL (in this specific case!) Synonym for 'me too'. ;) I don't get that American OnLine (AOL) as me too? Eh? http://catb.org/jargon/html/A/AOL-.html Hartmut Well, that's my

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

2009-12-20 Thread Robert Kaiser
Phillip Jones wrote: Never mind you still can't see a users point of view. Never mind that I was one of the first people in the project to suggest we introduce some management window for the new form data, to come in a later version after 2.0 - I suggested that back in January or February

Re: I Can No Longer E-Mail Photos From Picasa

2009-12-20 Thread Mort
Arnie Goetchius wrote: Mort wrote: Hi, I'm running SM 2.0.1, and Windows XP Pro,and use Picasa3 for photo editing. Until today, I had no problem sending photos from Picasa via e-mail by clicking on Picasa's e- mail icon.Now, suddenly, I get a notice that the e-mail photo cannot be sent, as I

Re: Receive pictures in body of email

2009-12-20 Thread Phillip Jones
Mike C wrote: When someone sends me a picture or a small gif file in the body of an email I only receive it as an attachment. How do I get to receive it in the body of the email like it was sent? Mike C Done! And you can Keep the images. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't

Re: Receive pictures in body of email

2009-12-20 Thread Phillip Jones
BeeNeR wrote: On or about 12/20/2009 1:40 AM, Mike C typed the following: When someone sends me a picture or a small gif file in the body of an email I only receive it as an attachment. How do I get to receive it in the body of the email like it was sent? Mike C Click on 'VIEW' and then

Re: When opening a(n) news/usenet server, how do I not make it download headers?

2009-12-20 Thread Phillip Jones
Ant wrote: On 12/19/2009 5:48 PM PT, Phillip Jones typed: In v1.x, I open a news/usenet server and it only told me how many unread posts and total posts but not download posts. In v2.0.x, it does the same BUT also download the posts. How can I have v2 NOT download any posts until I highlight a

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

2009-12-20 Thread Phillip Jones
Philip Chee wrote: On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:57:54 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote: since I am a user I would have no standing with him a developer, nor would I have the funds to pay him to do it. So I guess will have to make do until he gets tired of maintaining it. You don't seem to be able to

only one blank tab on new browser - problem is back, and worse

2009-12-20 Thread Margo Guda
Not too long ago, I wrote about a problem when starting SM2.01 where I would not get my home pages loaded. It seemed to resolve itself when I did a disk clean. However, the problem is back, and it is worse than ever. Whatever startup option, either for the browser startup or just a new window,

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

2009-12-20 Thread Phillip Jones
Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Never mind you still can't see a users point of view. Never mind that I was one of the first people in the project to suggest we introduce some management window for the new form data, to come in a later version after 2.0 - I suggested that back in

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

2009-12-20 Thread JAS
Phillip Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:57:54 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote: since I am a user I would have no standing with him a developer, nor would I have the funds to pay him to do it. So I guess will have to make do until he gets tired of maintaining it. You

Re: Receive pictures in body of email

2009-12-20 Thread Mike C
BeeNeR wrote: On or about 12/20/2009 1:40 AM, Mike C typed the following: When someone sends me a picture or a small gif file in the body of an email I only receive it as an attachment. How do I get to receive it in the body of the email like it was sent? Mike C Click on 'VIEW' and then

Re: only one blank tab on new browser - problem is back, and worse

2009-12-20 Thread Martin Freitag
Margo Guda schrieb: Not too long ago, I wrote about a problem when starting SM2.01 where I would not get my home pages loaded. It seemed to resolve itself when I did a disk clean. However, the problem is back, and it is worse than ever. Whatever startup option, either for the browser startup or

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

2009-12-20 Thread Benoit Renard
Phillip Jones wrote: Never mind you still can't see a users point of view. The user's point of view is irrelevant in this case, and not what we were talking about. It was a development issue, plain and simple. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: The SM2 downgrade

2009-12-20 Thread Martin Freitag
Graham schrieb: It's that bad. No, not THAT bad. ;-P First there's the need to provide your master password when you start it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth could something like that slip through the development process? Do the developers not use

Re: only one blank tab on new browser - problem is back, and worse

2009-12-20 Thread Margo Guda
Phillip Jones wrote: Margo Guda wrote: Not too long ago, I wrote about a problem when starting SM2.01 where I would not get my home pages loaded. It seemed to resolve itself when I did a disk clean. However, the problem is back, and it is worse than ever. Whatever startup option, either for

Re: SM 2.01 high CPU load

2009-12-20 Thread Martin Freitag
Zanqeutil schrieb: I'm still wandering why badly written java scripts affects SM2 more then SM 1.1.18 on my system. I even cannot move my mouse when I use SM2. Hum, it's not that bad for me but you're right usually SM2 should perform better in javascript performance than SM1, not worse.

Need a site check for SM 2.01

2009-12-20 Thread chicagofan
I'm unable to see the building photos at this site. Is it my settings, or a site conflict? TIA for any checks... and advice. bj

any word/hope on restoring form manger? (no contnet)

2009-12-20 Thread me2
___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Need a site check for SM 2.01

2009-12-20 Thread Dick Hoffman
chicagofan wrote: I'm unable to see the building photos at this site. Is it my settings, or a site conflict? TIA for any checks... and advice. bj

Re: SM 2.0.1 personal toolbar )bookmarks)

2009-12-20 Thread me2
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:39:25 -0500, Phillip Jones pjon...@kimbanet.com wrote: me2 wrote: How do I NOT show the bookmarks folder in my toolbar? I mean the one SM adds that is named Bookmarks, this isn't needed any way since Bookmarks appears in the top drop downs, and it takes up room that I

Re: Need a site check for SM 2.01

2009-12-20 Thread chicagofan
Dick Hoffman wrote: chicagofan wrote: I'm unable to see the building photos at this site. Is it my settings, or a site conflict? TIA for any checks... and advice. bj

Re: Receive pictures in body of email

2009-12-20 Thread Mike C
Phillip Jones wrote: Mike C wrote: When someone sends me a picture or a small gif file in the body of an email I only receive it as an attachment. How do I get to receive it in the body of the email like it was sent? Mike C Done! And you can Keep the images. What's done? And what images?

Re: Need a site check for SM 2.01

2009-12-20 Thread chicagofan
chicagofan wrote: Dick Hoffman wrote: chicagofan wrote: I'm unable to see the building photos at this site. Is it my settings, or a site conflict? TIA for any checks... and advice. bj

Re: only one blank tab on new browser - problem is back, and worse

2009-12-20 Thread Margo Guda
Martin Freitag wrote: Margo Guda schrieb: Not too long ago, I wrote about a problem when starting SM2.01 where I would not get my home pages loaded. It seemed to resolve itself when I did a disk clean. However, the problem is back, and it is worse than ever. Whatever startup option, either

Re: Need a site check for SM 2.01

2009-12-20 Thread Mike C
chicagofan wrote: chicagofan wrote: Dick Hoffman wrote: chicagofan wrote: I'm unable to see the building photos at this site. Is it my settings, or a site conflict? TIA for any checks... and advice. bj

Re: only one blank tab on new browser - problem is back, and worse

2009-12-20 Thread Margo Guda
Martin Freitag wrote: Margo Guda schrieb: Not too long ago, I wrote about a problem when starting SM2.01 where I would not get my home pages loaded. It seemed to resolve itself when I did a disk clean. However, the problem is back, and it is worse than ever. Whatever startup option, either

Re: Need a site check for SM 2.01

2009-12-20 Thread Phillip Jones
chicagofan wrote: I'm unable to see the building photos at this site. Is it my settings, or a site conflict? TIA for any checks... and advice. bj

Re: only one blank tab on new browser - problem is back, and worse

2009-12-20 Thread Phillip Jones
Margo Guda wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Margo Guda schrieb: Not too long ago, I wrote about a problem when starting SM2.01 where I would not get my home pages loaded. It seemed to resolve itself when I did a disk clean. However, the problem is back, and it is worse than ever. Whatever

Re: Receive pictures in body of email

2009-12-20 Thread Phillip Jones
Mike C wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Mike C wrote: When someone sends me a picture or a small gif file in the body of an email I only receive it as an attachment. How do I get to receive it in the body of the email like it was sent? Mike C Done! And you can Keep the images. What's done?

Re: The SM2 downgrade

2009-12-20 Thread Phillip Jones
Martin Freitag wrote: Graham schrieb: It's that bad. No, not THAT bad. ;-P First there's the need to provide your master password when you start it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth could something like that slip through the development process? Do the

Re: any word/hope on restoring form manger? (no content)

2009-12-20 Thread Phillip Jones
me2 wrote: From the sounds of things . No. download the Form History manager add on. It's a decent substitute. Its not perfect but it will work okay. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org

Re: SM 2.01 high CPU load

2009-12-20 Thread Zanqeutil
Martin Freitag schreef: Zanqeutil schrieb: I'm still wandering why badly written java scripts affects SM2 more then SM 1.1.18 on my system. I even cannot move my mouse when I use SM2. Hum, it's not that bad for me but you're right usually SM2 should perform better in javascript performance

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

2009-12-20 Thread Phillip Jones
JAS wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:57:54 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote: since I am a user I would have no standing with him a developer, nor would I have the funds to pay him to do it. So I guess will have to make do until he gets tired of maintaining it.

Re: The SM2 downgrade

2009-12-20 Thread Rufus
Graham wrote: I've been reading the posts from people who have been quite adamant, even rude, about SeaMonkey 2's deficiencies. I held off from installing 2.0.0, and waited from 2.0.1. I thought there were bound to be some problems, but how could it be all that bad? It's that bad. First

FYI Nuke-anything add-on blocks captcha / image verification

2009-12-20 Thread solidstate
Seamonkey 2.0 on Ubuntu karmic drove me nuts. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

2009-12-20 Thread Rufus
Benoit Renard wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Never mind you still can't see a users point of view. The user's point of view is irrelevant in this case, and not what we were talking about. It was a development issue, plain and simple. ...if users aren't being considered in a development path,

Re: Receive pictures in body of email

2009-12-20 Thread Mike C
Phillip Jones wrote: Mike C wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Mike C wrote: When someone sends me a picture or a small gif file in the body of an email I only receive it as an attachment. How do I get to receive it in the body of the email like it was sent? Mike C Done! And you can Keep the

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

2009-12-20 Thread Michael Gordon
Phillip Jones replied On 12/20/2009 10:05 AM Philip Chee wrote: On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:57:54 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote: since I am a user I would have no standing with him a developer, nor would I have the funds to pay him to do it. So I guess will have to make do until he gets tired of

Re: The SM2 downgrade

2009-12-20 Thread Rufus
Phillip Jones wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Graham schrieb: It's that bad. No, not THAT bad. ;-P First there's the need to provide your master password when you start it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth could something like that slip through the

Re: SM 2.0.1 freezing

2009-12-20 Thread Christian Mondrup
Bob Minchin wrote: Since updating to SM2.0.1. both the browser and email lock up for a minute or two quite regularly. Previous installs of sm 1.xx and sm2.0 have not done this. I'm not aware of changing anything else recently This can happen when typing or just scrolling. I'm using win xp home.

Re: only one blank tab on new browser - problem is back, and worse

2009-12-20 Thread Margo Guda
Phillip Jones wrote: Margo Guda wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Margo Guda wrote: Not too long ago, I wrote about a problem when starting SM2.01 where I would not get my home pages loaded. It seemed to resolve itself when I did a disk clean. However, the problem is back, and it is worse than

Re: only one blank tab on new browser - problem is back, and worse

2009-12-20 Thread Margo Guda
Phillip Jones wrote: Margo Guda wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Margo Guda wrote: Not too long ago, I wrote about a problem when starting SM2.01 where I would not get my home pages loaded. It seemed to resolve itself when I did a disk clean. However, the problem is back, and it is worse than

Re: any word/hope on restoring form manger? (no content)

2009-12-20 Thread me2
I am using it, but find the present system odd in that I can't understand what it will remember and what it won't. On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 14:07:39 -0500, Phillip Jones pjon...@kimbanet.com wrote: me2 wrote: From the sounds of things . No. download the Form History manager add on. It's a

Re: only one blank tab on new browser - problem is back, and worse

2009-12-20 Thread Phillip Jones
Margo Guda wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Margo Guda wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Margo Guda wrote: Not too long ago, I wrote about a problem when starting SM2.01 where I would not get my home pages loaded. It seemed to resolve itself when I did a disk clean. However, the problem is back,

Re: Edit msg as new SM 2.0.1

2009-12-20 Thread z3c
On Dec 16, 9:37 pm, z3c zzz.co...@googlemail.com wrote: On Dec 16, 9:28 pm, Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com wrote: BeeNeR wrote: On or about 12/16/2009 8:17 AM,z3ctyped the following: Hi! Problem happens here, too. Adresscompletion when composing messages causes SM2.0.1 to hang.

Re: The SM2 downgrade

2009-12-20 Thread Phillip Jones
Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Graham schrieb: It's that bad. No, not THAT bad. ;-P First there's the need to provide your master password when you start it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

2009-12-20 Thread »Q«
In news:poqdnxdfxsh75bpwnz2dnuvz_vbi4...@mozilla.org, Rufus n...@home.com wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Never mind you still can't see a users point of view. The user's point of view is irrelevant in this case, and not what we were talking about. It was a

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

2009-12-20 Thread Leonidas Jones
Philip Chee wrote: On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:57:54 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote: since I am a user I would have no standing with him a developer, nor would I have the funds to pay him to do it. So I guess will have to make do until he gets tired of maintaining it. You don't seem to be able to

Re: The SM2 downgrade

2009-12-20 Thread Rufus
Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Graham schrieb: It's that bad. No, not THAT bad. ;-P First there's the need to provide your master password when you start it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at

2.0.1 upgrade

2009-12-20 Thread Ken Rudolph
Wow! I just noticed that the security upgrade to SM 2.0.1 was handled invisibly behind the scenes without my active participation or even noticing that it happened (although I think I did check approve without thinking about it when Zone Alarm told me that SeaMonkey was attempting to contact

Re: 2.0.1 upgrade

2009-12-20 Thread Mike C
Ken Rudolph wrote: Wow! I just noticed that the security upgrade to SM 2.0.1 was handled invisibly behind the scenes without my active participation or even noticing that it happened (although I think I did check approve without thinking about it when Zone Alarm told me that SeaMonkey was

Re: When opening a(n) news/usenet server, how do I not make it download headers?

2009-12-20 Thread Ant
On 12/20/2009 8:00 AM PT, Phillip Jones typed: In v1.x, I open a news/usenet server and it only told me how many unread posts and total posts but not download posts. In v2.0.x, it does the same BUT also download the posts. How can I have v2 NOT download any posts until I highlight a specific

SM 2.0.1 vs 1.1.18...again...

2009-12-20 Thread Rufus
Just been looking over the user options between the two, and I have to say that as far as the user is concerned, 1.1.18 had/has far more user flexibility for configuration, far more informative dialog boxes, buttons I could actually use, and with few exceptions behaved as I wanted it to...

Unable to import seamonkey 1.x to Seamonkey 2.0

2009-12-20 Thread ad...@mmri.us
SeaMonkey 2.0 fails to import all my mail folders and everything ticked in the selection what should be imported. After it imports and correctly finds the correct profile, it just still shows blank mail folders. If I restart SeaMonkey mail, it asks me again if I want to configure email!? This

Re: 2.0.1 upgrade

2009-12-20 Thread JAS
Mike C wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: Wow! I just noticed that the security upgrade to SM 2.0.1 was handled invisibly behind the scenes without my active participation or even noticing that it happened (although I think I did check approve without thinking about it when Zone Alarm told me that

Re: SM 2.01 high CPU load

2009-12-20 Thread NoOp
On 12/18/2009 11:12 AM, Zanqeutil wrote: I love Seamonkey 2.0 and now 2.01 ! The migration went without any problems, SM2 ipmorted everything from SM 1.1.18. Question. This site completely feezes my PC in SM2. http://www.daralhayat.com/morenews/english/ SM2 CPU load is 100 %. I

Re: The SM2 downgrade

2009-12-20 Thread NoOp
On 12/20/2009 11:31 AM, Rufus wrote: ... When and how SM asks for your Master really depends (or should depend) on how you have your prefs set - for ex.; I'm set for SM to ask for the Master the first time it's required, so it should not ask at startup because you haven't done anything -

Re: The SM2 downgrade

2009-12-20 Thread Rufus
NoOp wrote: On 12/20/2009 11:31 AM, Rufus wrote: ... When and how SM asks for your Master really depends (or should depend) on how you have your prefs set - for ex.; I'm set for SM to ask for the Master the first time it's required, so it should not ask at startup because you haven't done

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

2009-12-20 Thread Robert Kaiser
Rufus wrote: ...if users aren't being considered in a development path, that's a pretty inconsiderate way to develop a product. I fully agree. The picture is just not that simple usually, and most of the time it's tradeoffs between listening to different user bases, or tradeoffs causing to

Re: 2.0.1 upgrade

2009-12-20 Thread Phillip Jones
Ken Rudolph wrote: Wow! I just noticed that the security upgrade to SM 2.0.1 was handled invisibly behind the scenes without my active participation or even noticing that it happened (although I think I did check approve without thinking about it when Zone Alarm told me that SeaMonkey was

Re: SM 2.0.1 freezing

2009-12-20 Thread jim
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:00:56 +, Bob Minchin nos...@nospam.org in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote: It's cold here too. . . . . . . (Sorry, couldn't resist) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

2009-12-20 Thread Rufus
Robert Kaiser wrote: Rufus wrote: ...if users aren't being considered in a development path, that's a pretty inconsiderate way to develop a product. I fully agree. The picture is just not that simple usually, and most of the time it's tradeoffs between listening to different user bases, or

Re: Redbox.com doesn't like SeaMonkey v2?

2009-12-20 Thread Ant
On 12/14/2009 8:56 PM PT, Ant typed: I don't use RedBox. Thus, I'm putting the burden on you (Ant). If this is not fixed within the next two weeks or so, send a letter to the CEO of the company. Don't be too technical, but point out (1) they are excluding a portion of their potential customer

Re: The SM2 downgrade

2009-12-20 Thread Graham
Martin Freitag wrote: Graham schrieb: First there's the need to provide your master password when you start it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth could something like that slip through the development process? Do the developers not use master passwords? If it

Re: When opening a(n) news/usenet server, how do I not make it download headers?

2009-12-20 Thread Phillip Jones
Ant wrote: On 12/20/2009 8:00 AM PT, Phillip Jones typed: In v1.x, I open a news/usenet server and it only told me how many unread posts and total posts but not download posts. In v2.0.x, it does the same BUT also download the posts. How can I have v2 NOT download any posts until I highlight a

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

2009-12-20 Thread NoOp
On 12/20/2009 07:36 PM, Rufus wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Rufus wrote: ...if users aren't being considered in a development path, that's a pretty inconsiderate way to develop a product. I fully agree. The picture is just not that simple usually, and most of the time it's tradeoffs between

Re: SM 2.0.1 freezing

2009-12-20 Thread Leonidas Jones
Bob Minchin wrote: Since updating to SM2.0.1. both the browser and email lock up for a minute or two quite regularly. Previous installs of sm 1.xx and sm2.0 have not done this. I'm not aware of changing anything else recently This can happen when typing or just scrolling. I'm using win xp home.

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

2009-12-20 Thread Rufus
NoOp wrote: On 12/20/2009 07:36 PM, Rufus wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Rufus wrote: ...if users aren't being considered in a development path, that's a pretty inconsiderate way to develop a product. I fully agree. The picture is just not that simple usually, and most of the time it's

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

2009-12-20 Thread Phillip Jones
»Q« wrote: Innews:poqdnxdfxsh75bpwnz2dnuvz_vbi4...@mozilla.org, Rufusn...@home.com wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Never mind you still can't see a users point of view. The user's point of view is irrelevant in this case, and not what we were talking about. It was a

Re: Unable to import seamonkey 1.x to Seamonkey 2.0

2009-12-20 Thread John
ad...@mmri.us wrote: SeaMonkey 2.0 fails to import all my mail folders and everything ticked in the selection what should be imported. After it imports and correctly finds the correct profile, it just still shows blank mail folders. If I restart SeaMonkey mail, it asks me again if I want to

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

2009-12-20 Thread Philip Chee
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:25:37 -0500, Leonidas Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: You don't seem to be able to grasp the concept of Open Source. Perhaps you should just give up and install Maxthon. Not an option, he's on a Mac. Parellels, VMWare Fusion, probably Virtual Box. Phil -- Philip

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

2009-12-20 Thread Phillip Jones
Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:25:37 -0500, Leonidas Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: You don't seem to be able to grasp the concept of Open Source. Perhaps you should just give up and install Maxthon. Not an option, he's on a Mac. Parellels, VMWare Fusion, probably Virtual

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?till not an answer

2009-12-20 Thread Leonidas Jones
Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:25:37 -0500, Leonidas Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: You don't seem to be able to grasp the concept of Open Source. Perhaps you should just give up and install Maxthon. Not an option, he's on a Mac. Parellels, VMWare Fusion, probably Virtual

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

2009-12-20 Thread »Q«
In news:796dna1o5zc2clpwnz2dnuvz_hcdn...@mozilla.org, Rufus n...@home.com wrote: That a REALLY short treatise on how I've done it...and a fair start for anyone else. Some of what you wrote is applicable to SeaMonkey and some isn't. There were some underlying assumptions, such as the project

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

2009-12-20 Thread Rufus
»Q« wrote: Innews:796dna1o5zc2clpwnz2dnuvz_hcdn...@mozilla.org, Rufusn...@home.com wrote: That a REALLY short treatise on how I've done it...and a fair start for anyone else. Some of what you wrote is applicable to SeaMonkey and some isn't. There were some underlying assumptions, such as

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?till not an answer

2009-12-20 Thread Phillip Jones
Leonidas Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:25:37 -0500, Leonidas Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: You don't seem to be able to grasp the concept of Open Source. Perhaps you should just give up and install Maxthon. Not an option, he's on a Mac. Parellels, VMWare

SM v2.0.1's Browser Startup's Restore Previous Session does not prompt when exiting.

2009-12-20 Thread Ant
Hi! When using Browser Startup's Restore Previous Session option, ctrl-Q (or exit button) just quits without prompting me to confirm. Isn't this a bug? Sometimes my fingers acciodently click on ctrl-q instead of ctrl-w. Thank you in advance. :) -- Ants follow fat. --unknown /\___/\ / /\