Leonidas Jones schrieb:
HenriK wrote:
While I am probably doing something wrong or just plain dumb, I can't
seem to get GMail to work with SM v.2.01.
1) What version of Thunderbird does the SM v.2.01 e-mail client most
resemble (because GMail gives instructions for Thunderbird set up)?
2) For
Are there any plans to update the security of cookies to the settings
that were available in 1.x SM? i.e. Preferences/Privacy
Security/Cookies/Allow cookies based on privacy settings.
Being able to have different levels of acceptance/denial of various
cookies was, at least *I* though, a great
NoOp wrote:
On 01/04/2010 12:24 PM, NoOp wrote:
SeaMonkey 1.1.18 picks up the font as shown in your google-chrome.png.
Firefox 3.5.6 does not. I'll need to close SeaMonkey 2.0.1 to test
also will test in 2.0.2pre.
Nope. SM 2.0.1 and 2.0.2pre (linux) do not display the font(s). Again,
1.1.18
On 1/4/2010 10:24 AM, me2 wrote:
Yep. That would be nice ... would be nice if Firefox used the Old
SeaMonkey Form Manager, too!
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
BeeNeR wrote:
Are there any plans to update the security of cookies to the settings
that were available in 1.x SM? i.e. Preferences/Privacy
Security/Cookies/Allow cookies based on privacy settings.
Being able to have different levels of acceptance/denial of various
cookies was, at least *I*
BeeNeR wrote:
Are there any plans to update the security of cookies to the settings
that were available in 1.x SM? i.e. Preferences/Privacy
Security/Cookies/Allow cookies based on privacy settings.
Being able to have different levels of acceptance/denial of various
cookies was, at least *I*
Ray_Net wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
bdiver wrote:
The seamonkey lock up has happened many times since I upgraded to
2.01, is there is fix or something I'm doing wrong?
See third point in
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.0.1/#issues
Thanks Robert for this usefull link.
MikeyG wrote:
On 1/4/2010 10:24 AM, me2 wrote:
Yep. That would be nice ... would be nice if Firefox used the Old
SeaMonkey Form Manager, too!
The subject has been beat to death. The powers that be don't have the
manpower, knowledge, interest, desire, willingness to do so.
As a workable
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Has anyone got IETab to work with SM v1.1.18 and Windows 7 64-bit? I'm
not getting the icon in the lower right corner like I did with XP.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
On or about 1/5/2010 9:05 AM, Phillip Jones typed the following:
BeeNeR wrote:
Are there any plans to update the security of cookies to the settings
that were available in 1.x SM? i.e. Preferences/Privacy
Security/Cookies/Allow cookies based on privacy settings.
Being able to have
On 1/5/2010 6:00 AM, Rob C. wrote:
BeeNeR wrote:
Are there any plans to update the security of cookies to the settings
that were available in 1.x SM? i.e. Preferences/Privacy
Security/Cookies/Allow cookies based on privacy settings.
Being able to have different levels of acceptance/denial
BeeNeR wrote:
On or about 1/5/2010 9:05 AM, Phillip Jones typed the following:
BeeNeR wrote:
Are there any plans to update the security of cookies to the settings
that were available in 1.x SM? i.e. Preferences/Privacy
Security/Cookies/Allow cookies based on privacy settings.
Being able to
On 01/05/2010 04:03 AM, Christian Mondrup wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
so, it's nothing to do with Ubuntu fonts as 1.1.18 does pick up the font.
Just to be sure I was getting the fonts right, I opened a doc in
OpenOffice.org and used the fonts inserted the 'b' and it also shows
as in your
I've renamed mozilla.org.old but I can't remove it because
something is in use.
Otherwise SM 2.0 is running perfectly
How can I complete the removal of .18 ?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
On 01/05/2010 03:27 AM, BeeNeR wrote:
Are there any plans to update the security of cookies to the settings
that were available in 1.x SM? i.e. Preferences/Privacy
Security/Cookies/Allow cookies based on privacy settings.
Being able to have different levels of acceptance/denial of
Rick Merrill schrieb:
I've renamed mozilla.org.old but I can't remove it because
something is in use.
Otherwise SM 2.0 is running perfectly
How can I complete the removal of .18 ?
Have you rebooted your PC in the meantime? If not, do so or shutdwn all
seamonkey and kill all seamonkey.exe
Martin Freitag wrote:
Rick Merrill schrieb:
I've renamed mozilla.org.old but I can't remove it because
something is in use.
Otherwise SM 2.0 is running perfectly
How can I complete the removal of .18 ?
Have you rebooted your PC in the meantime? If not, do so or shutdwn all
seamonkey and
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:14:32 -0500, Phillip Jones
pjon...@kimbanet.com wrote:
The powers that be don't have the
manpower, knowledge, interest, desire, willingness to do so
I hope we have not reached the point where seamonkey, or indeed any
free software, will defined by a few - the genius of
HenriK wrote:
While I am probably doing something wrong or just plain dumb, I can't
seem to get GMail to work with SM v.2.01.
1) What version of Thunderbird does the SM v.2.01 e-mail client most
resemble (because GMail gives instructions for Thunderbird set up)?
2) For GMail, which connection
On 01/05/2010 11:27 AM, me2 wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:14:32 -0500, Phillip Jones
pjon...@kimbanet.com wrote:
The powers that be don't have the
manpower, knowledge, interest, desire, willingness to do so
I hope we have not reached the point where seamonkey, or indeed any
free
Hi everyone,
You probably will notice a Firefox 3.5.7 update being published within
the next hours, containing a very small amount of fixes on top of 3.5.6
and you might wonder if a SeaMonkey update is due as well.
Indeed, we are preparing an update with the same few Gecko fixes, we
just
I spend the winter at another location. In the past I merely had to
change my outgoing server name to my new location ISP in order to send mail.
I now get the following messsge:
An error occurred while sending mail. The mail server responded:
Authentication Failed, must login. Please check the
me2 wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:14:32 -0500, Phillip Jones
pjon...@kimbanet.com wrote:
The powers that be don't have the
manpower, knowledge, interest, desire, willingness to do so
I hope we have not reached the point where seamonkey, or indeed any
free software, will defined by a few -
Mr. Cheese wrote:
I spend the winter at another location. In the past I merely had to
change my outgoing server name to my new location ISP in order to send mail.
I now get the following messsge:
An error occurred while sending mail. The mail server responded:
Authentication Failed, must login.
On 1/5/2010 4:27 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
me2 wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:14:32 -0500, Phillip Jones
pjon...@kimbanet.com wrote:
The powers that be don't have the
manpower, knowledge, interest, desire, willingness to do so
I hope we have not reached the point where seamonkey, or indeed
I'm going to make the unlikely assumption that your posting was of
good intent - that you surely recognized that the initial post was a
plea to the seamonkey community to restore what I believe is an
important part of the original Netscape heritage. That my followup
plainly said I belied that the
Phillip Jones wrote:
Mr. Cheese wrote:
I spend the winter at another location. In the past I merely had to
change my outgoing server name to my new location ISP in order to send
mail.
I now get the following messsge:
An error occurred while sending mail. The mail server responded:
On 01/05/2010 03:04 PM, me2 wrote:
I'm going to make the unlikely assumption that your posting was of
good intent - that you surely recognized that the initial post was a
plea to the seamonkey community to restore what I believe is an
important part of the original Netscape heritage. That my
... ANYONE KNOW WHERE I can get a starry blue theme, just starry blue.
sid
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
MikeyG wrote:
On 1/4/2010 10:24 AM, me2 wrote:
Yep. That would be nice ... would be nice if Firefox used the Old
SeaMonkey Form Manager, too!
...would be even nicer if it encrypted the contents of the Form
Manager...if it doesn't. The user can't really tell.
--
- Rufus
beelzib...@comcast.net wrote:
... ANYONE KNOW WHERE I can get a starry blue theme, just starry blue.
sid
Sailfish has the American and All American themes available:
http://www.projectit.com/
Sort of a dull gray-blue, with some stars, closest I know of.
Lee
HenriK wrote:
While I am probably doing something wrong or just plain dumb, I can't
seem to get GMail to work with SM v.2.01.
1) What version of Thunderbird does the SM v.2.01 e-mail client most
resemble (because GMail gives instructions for Thunderbird set up)?
2) For GMail, which
Phillip Jones wrote:
me2 wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:14:32 -0500, Phillip Jones
pjon...@kimbanet.com wrote:
The powers that be don't have the
manpower, knowledge, interest, desire, willingness to do so
I hope we have not reached the point where seamonkey, or indeed any
free software,
NoOp wrote:
On 01/05/2010 03:27 AM, BeeNeR wrote:
Are there any plans to update the security of cookies to the settings
that were available in 1.x SM? i.e. Preferences/Privacy
Security/Cookies/Allow cookies based on privacy settings.
Being able to have different levels of acceptance/denial
Rufus wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
me2 wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:14:32 -0500, Phillip Jones
pjon...@kimbanet.com wrote:
The powers that be don't have the
manpower, knowledge, interest, desire, willingness to do so
I hope we have not reached the point where seamonkey, or indeed any
free
On 01/05/2010 06:23 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 01/05/2010 03:27 AM, BeeNeR wrote:
Are there any plans to update the security of cookies to the settings
that were available in 1.x SM? i.e. Preferences/Privacy
Security/Cookies/Allow cookies based on privacy settings.
I was on SM 1.7 and it was working fine. I upgraded to SM2.0.1. First I
was not able to send. Changing the auth setting the SM 2.0.1 changed fixed
that. Then I ran into the address book issue. Where deleting the OA
address book that SM 2.0.1 creates, fixes the issue. There is a bug about
On 1/5/2010 6:43 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 01/05/2010 06:23 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 01/05/2010 03:27 AM, BeeNeR wrote:
Are there any plans to update the security of cookies to the settings
that were available in 1.x SM? i.e. Preferences/Privacy
Security/Cookies/Allow cookies
David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/5/2010 6:43 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 01/05/2010 06:23 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 01/05/2010 03:27 AM, BeeNeR wrote:
Are there any plans to update the security of cookies to the settings
that were available in 1.x SM? i.e. Preferences/Privacy
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
me2 wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:14:32 -0500, Phillip Jones
pjon...@kimbanet.com wrote:
The powers that be don't have the
manpower, knowledge, interest, desire, willingness to do so
I hope we have not reached the point where
41 matches
Mail list logo
