SeaMonkey 2.53.7 released!

Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.53.7. This isn't going to be a quick canned notification as there is significance in this post. What's so significant? This could be my last "New release" post here on the newsgroups (well, unless we release

seamonkey-dev, and seamonkey-support lists/newsgroups

Dear All, If you're not aware by now, please let me state that both the Mailing Lists and Newsgroups will be decommissioned soon (Early April). Why? === Why indeed. Tbh, I don't know why. I would believe it's related to the overhead of maintenance and such; but whatever the reasons are, it's

SeaMonkey 2.53.7b1 released!

Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.53.7b1. So please check out [1] or [2]. Thanks to all involved. Edmund PS: Yeah, somewhat a canned message. Currently in the middle of a bunch of things while doing release, so my apologies. Links: [1] -

SeaMonkey 2.53.6 released!

Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.53.6. So please check out [1] or [2]. Thanks to all involved. Edmund PS: Yeah, somewhat a canned message. Currently in the middle of a bunch of things while doing release, so my apologies. Links: [1] -

SeaMonkey 2.53.6b1 released!

Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.53.6b1. So please check out [1] or [2] for what is changed from 2.53.6b1. Thanks to all involved. Edmund Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.53.6 [2] -

Re: Updates: General

Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote: > Edmund Wong wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I hope all is well with everyone. >> >> I've been spending a lot of time working on the update system.  When I >> started this project some time ago,  I had just wanted to use the >

Re: Updates: re: 2.49.5

Edmund Wong wrote: > Hi All, > > This is a quick specific mention for version 2.49.5. > > There are no updates to this version. There are updates to 2.49.4. > Just none to 2.49.5. Users hoping to update to this > version will need to update manually. Further to my post,

Updates: re: 2.49.5

Hi All, This is a quick specific mention for version 2.49.5. There are no updates to this version. There are updates to 2.49.4. Just none to 2.49.5. Users hoping to update to this version will need to update manually. Why? Because 2.49.5 was a difficult version (at least for me) to release

Updates: General

Hi All, I hope all is well with everyone. I've been spending a lot of time working on the update system. When I started this project some time ago, I had just wanted to use the old system and update (pun not intended)it. Gave up that idea and went for something else. Now fast forward a few

SeaMonkey 2.53.5.1 released!

Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.53.5.1. So please check out [1] or [2] for what is changed from 2.53.5. Thanks to all involved. Edmund Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.53.5.1 [2] -

SeaMonkey 2.53.5 released!

Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.53.5. While it was actually released on the 14th, I've only gotten the chance of posting this today. My apologies. So please check out [1] or [2]. Further to note that due to some issues(I would believe bugs,

SeaMonkey 2.53.5b1 released!

Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.53.5 Beta 1. So please check out [1] or [2]. Thanks to all involved. Edmund Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.53.5b1 [2] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.53.5/

SeaMonkey 2.53.4 released!

Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.53.4 final. So please check out [1] or [2]. Updates are still not available via Check-for-updates unfortunately. I am *still* working on it. Thanks to all involved. Edmund Links: [1] -

SeaMonkey 2.53.4 Beta 1 released!

Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.53.4 Beta 4. So please check out [1] or [2]. Updates are still not available via Check-for-updates unfortunately. I am *still* working on it. Thanks to all involved. Edmund Links: [1] -

SeaMonkey 2.53.3 released!

Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.53.3. So please check out [1] or [2]. Updates are still not available via Check-for-updates unfortunately. I am *still* working on it. Thanks to all involved. Edmund Links: [1] -

Re: Has SM 2.52 Done Something To Windows Explorer Or Is The Problem Elsewhere?

Henrik37 wrote: > Since about the time I installed SM2.52 on my wife's PC, the Windows > Explorer no longer behaves as it used to. As far as I know, SeaMonkey doesn't fiddle with Windows Explorer or any of its settings. > > Could the problem be caused by a recent installation of Edge or >

Re: SeaMonkey 2.53.3 Beta 1 released! [Updated]

Edmund Wong wrote: > Greetings, Before anyone wonders, no this wasn't an updated post. Three possible reasons (well.. there a lot of 'possible' reasons... just one particular true one): 1) I had posted "SeaMonkey 2.53.3 Beta 1 released, but made a mistake so I followed up with this p

Re: SeaMonkey 2.53.2 released!

Is it just me or was my original SeaMonkey 2.53.2 released post deleted? Edmund ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

SeaMonkey 2.53.3 Beta 1 released! [Updated]

Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.53.3 Beta 1. So please check out [1] or [2]. Updates are still not available via Check-for-updates unfortunately. I am *still* working on it. Thanks to all involved. Edmund Links: [1] -

SeaMonkey 2.53.2 released!

Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.53.2. So please check out [1] or [2]. Updates are still not available via Check-for-updates unfortunately. I am working on it. Edmund Links: [1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.53.2 [2] -

Re: 2.53.2b1 sources

BERTRAND Joël wrote: > Hello, > > If I remember, 2.53.2 should be built on FreeBSD. But where are sources > ? Link provided on https://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.53.2b1 > (https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/releases/2.53.2b1/source/seamonkey-2.53.2b1.source.tar.xz) >

Re: 2.53.2b1 sources

BERTRAND Joël wrote: > Hello, > > If I remember, 2.53.2 should be built on FreeBSD. But where are sources > ? Link provided on https://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.53.2b1 > (https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/releases/2.53.2b1/source/seamonkey-2.53.2b1.source.tar.xz) >

SeaMonkey 2.53.2 Beta 1 released! [Updated]

Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.53.2 Beta 1. So please check out [1] or [2]. Updates are still not available via Check-for-updates unfortunately. I am working on it. Thanks to all involved. Namely kudos to IanN and FRG for their hard working

SeaMonkey 2.53.2 Beta 1 released!

Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.53.2 Beta 1. So please check out [1] or [2]. Updates are still not available via Check-for-updates unfortunately. I am working on it. Thanks to all involved. Namely kudos to IanN and FRG for their hard working

Re: SeaMonkey 2.53.2 Beta 1 released!

In my rush, I had missed the fact that the website changes haven't been pushed. So naturally, if you get a 404 on any of the links... you know who to blame.. oh ..look, the clouds are so beautiful... ;P (My apologies..) Edmund Edmund Wong wrote: > Greetings, > > The SeaMonke

Re: SeaMonkey 2.53.1 released!

*sheepish grin while pondering on this predictament* Um.. erm.. Did I mention that you've got a smashing shirt on? No? You have a smashing shirt on! In all seriousnessity (yeah..no such word..), I jumped the gun. I should've pushed the website updates and WAITED for the website to update

SeaMonkey 2.53.1 released!

Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.53.1! So please check out [1] or [2]. Updates are still not available via Check-for-updates unfortunately. Thanks to all involved, Edmund NB: Personal note, I've never understood the concept of the

SeaMonkey v2.53.1b1 is Released!

Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.53.1b1! It's the first beta in the 2.53 series. For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.53.1b1, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.53.1b1 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of

Re: "Updating everyone…" --SeaMonkey Project Blog on 12/19/2018...

Gunther Nikl wrote: >> I'm not sure.  Will need to ping someone at Mozilla as the blog is >> hosted by Mozilla (for now). > > Thank you for considering my inquiry. Its not that important, but still > would > be nice. However, if the blog is hosted by Mozilla then I am sceptical that > they are

Re: "Updating everyone…" --SeaMonkey Project Blog on 12/19/2018...

Gunther Nikl wrote: > Edmund Wong wrote: >>>> https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2018/12/19/updating-everyone/ > > (Slightly) OT but is it possible to offer the blog also with TLSv1 using > ECC ciphers (ecdhe_ecdsa_aes)? The main site of seamonkey-project.org is

Re: "Updating everyone…" --SeaMonkey Project Blog on 12/19/2018...

Daniel wrote: > Ant wrote on 19/12/2018 12:13 PM: >> https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2018/12/19/updating-everyone/ > > Thanks for the link, Ant. > > And EWong and Co, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you for all your past > efforts. > > As Alex said on the blog ... > Quote > I keep hope for this

Re: SeaMonkey web site problem?

Mort Linder wrote: > Hi, > >  When I click onto SeaMonkey, my Windows 7 laptop cannot find it. Yet, > when I type an URL into the upper toolbar,it works. > > What is happening? > Short form: I happened. I goofed. I fixed. Long Form:

Re: seamonkeyblog: End of an era… SeaMonkey’s old infrastructure.

Ant wrote: > https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2018/09/11/end-of-an-era/ > > Can't wait to see the future of SeaMonkey. I wonder if this means no > more minor v2.49.x releases with security fixes. :( No, it just means that we'll release the v2.49.x when we get this mess cleared up. And by

SeaMonkey 2.49.4 released

Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.49.4! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.49.4, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.49.4 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked

Re: Seamonkey Composer to Be Discontinued?

Ant wrote: > On 5/15/2018 3:46 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: >>  > I say on your May 14th Seamonkey Meeting Notes that Seamonkey >> Composer may be discontinued? >> >> Where did you see this? I wrote the notes and this is not mentioned >> anywhere. >> >>  > There was an enquiry by Mozilla if the

SeaMonkey 2.49.3 released

Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.49.3! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.49.3, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.49.3 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked

Re: Slowdowns over time when using SeaMonkey

Jonathan Wilson wrote: > > Is this kind of hanging/freezing/slowdown a known thing? Is there a > bugzilla bug (or bugs) that cover this issue? Is there anything that can > be done to mitigate or work around the issue? Could one of my plugins (I > use Addblock, ChatZilla, DOM Inspector,

Re: Mozilla Foundation Security Advisory 2018-08

NoOp wrote: > https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2018-08/ > Out of bounds memory write while processing Vorbis audio data > ANNOUNCED > March 16, 2018 > IMPACT > CRITICAL > PRODUCTS > Firefox, Firefox ESR > FIXED IN > Firefox 59.0.1 > Firefox ESR 52.7.2 > > Also see: >

Re: running Seamonkey 2.49.3 Windows 64 bit

Dirk Munk wrote: > > I really wish the developers would start producing official 64 bit > versions of Seamonkey. How many people are still using a 32 bit version > of Windows? Since Windows 7, 64 bit has become the standard Windows > version, older Windows versions are becoming obsolete now. I

Re: SeaMonkey 2.49.2 released!

Dirk Munk wrote: > Edmund Wong wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> After a not so long a delay, for which we apologize, the SeaMonkey >> Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.49.2! >> >> So please check out [1] or [2]. >> >> Up

SeaMonkey 2.49.2 released!

Greetings, After a not so long a delay, for which we apologize, the SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.49.2! So please check out [1] or [2]. Updates are still not available via Check-for-updates unfortunately. Thanks to all involved, Edmund Links: [1] -

Re: SeaMonkey v2.49.2 is coming soon!

Luis Carlos González Moráles wrote: > If web addons have to be implemented, could that veresion be SeaMonkey 3? If you mean WebExtensions as a SeaMonkey 3.0, that is definitely a possibility. > The 2.x versions have like 9 or so years that are developed: > I'm a blind user, so advanced things to

Re: SeaMonkey v2.49.2 is coming soon!

Daniel wrote: > Ant wrote: >> https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2018/02/06/quick-update/ and >> https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2018/02/05/next-release-is-2-49-2-and/ > > Humm!! Should we be worried that Ewong twice mentions "touch wood"?!? ;-P > Well... I'm always a skeptic when it comes

Re: Android?

rickman wrote: > Nothing for Android? I'm looking for a newreader for a tablet. > As much as we like to have support for multiple operating systems (including Android and iOS), unfortunately, we don't have the resources to add support for Android and/or iOS. Perhaps we may one day support

Re: SeaMonkey v2.49.1 is out!

Ant wrote: > Well almost! > > https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2017/11/04/2-49-1-is-out/ > https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2017/11/04/404-error/ > > Maybe more in https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/ soon. I am waiting for some response regarding the external infrastructure and see if it's

moderation

Hi all, Was reading mozilla.support.seamonkey and thought to myself, "geez.. there's certainly a lot of spam.. where's the moderation.." That's when my internal voice trailed off and said... 'oh'. So this is a heads-up. If you see an influx of old messages you can blame it on me. (or

Re: E MAIL CRASHES ON 2.48

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > It is probably bug 1286613: > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1286613 > > Solution is unfortunately to go back to 2.46 and wait for 2.49.1. Not > sure if we can backport all the parts to 2.48 and do a 2.48.1 It is worth doing that if it fixes problems.

Re: Cannot contact my router.

marksatt...@sbcglobal.net wrote: > Just updated to 2.48 a few minutes ago. Now I cannot contact my router at > 192.168.11 anymore. I get a red error screen saying...401 Authorization > Required > This server could not verify that you are authorized to access. Either you > supplied the

Re: IMCOIMPATIBLE!

wwel...@gmail.com wrote: > I've had problems all day with opening SM 2.48. It took me literally most of > the day to figure out what the solution was. > > I have a MAC macOS Sierra 10.12.6 and it appears as if SM 2.48 isn't > compatible with the Mac OS I am on. I'm not familiar with OSX; but,

win64 contributed builds.

Hi Everyone, Just wanna mention that I've generated the very first set of Win64 builds. I've set up a schedule to generate both 32 and 64 bit nightlies. But while it's building 2.53, Win64 isn't officially 'contributed' until (tentatively) 2.54 (which gives us some time to figure the quirks of

SeaMonkey 2.48 released!

Greetings, After so long a delay, for which we apologize, the SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.48! So please check out [1] or [2]. This release would not be possible without the help from a lot of people; but the person I'd like to thank personally is Nick

Re: Akalla language pack 2.48 failure

EE wrote: > Has anyone else noticed that Adrian Kalla's British English language > pack for SM 2.48 does not work? No idea about any other of the language > packs, but that one did not work with his or Mozilla's build of SM 2.48. l10n repacks have always been a pita to figure out. Can you

Re: Help

l.thames wrote: > Unable to send E-mail because "not in form user a host" How do I correct? I'm guessing you're entering an invalid email address. Edmund ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org

Re: Cannot compile 2.46

P. H. Madore wrote: > This is a new issue for me. I was using 2.40 until today. Now I can't use > anything. Something about "old-configure." Here is the complete > configuration log: > How are you building 2.46? Furthermore, what's the contents of:

Re: Sea Monkey Won't Start

Larry S. wrote: > My wife has SM 2.46 on a Dell laptop using Windows 10. Yesterday it > worked just fine. Today it won't start. No mail, no browser, nothing. > Her other programs work perfectly. > > She has restarted the computer at least three times. She checked on task > manager--one time it

Re: Browser not authentication-capable or authentication failed.

David C. Mores wrote: > I am trying to login on my Cisco/Linksys WRT120N home router admin page > at http://192.168.0.1/ using seamonkey. I get a pop up window prompting > for 'A username and password are being requested by http://192.168.0.1. > The site says: "WRT120N"' Clicking the OK button

Re: 2.46 update not working

Ken Rudolph wrote: > 1) POP e-mail not updating > 2) password manager crashes program > > I need to go back to 2.40 and have downloaded it. How can I make sure > that it will use my profile, and how can I stop it from updating to 2.46 > automatically. Help! > Hi Ken, Can you clarify what

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

NoOp wrote: > Edmund, > > Why is it necessary to reboot the computer when the Windows version is > installed? > > G > You shouldn't need to reboot. Edmund ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

Ant wrote: > On 12/23/2016 12:59 AM, Philipp van Hüllen wrote: >> Edmund Wong schrieb: >>> Yes... BELIEVE IT.. It's out! After so many months.. it's out!!! >> >> >> Working fine so far here (including update): >> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintos

Re: 2.46 version

John Duncan wrote: > Edmund Wong wrote: >> Pat Connors wrote: >>> In the interim since the 2.40 breach was discovered, I have been using >>> 2.47 64 bit with no problems what so ever. Question, when 2.46 is >>> available for download, should I use it or stay

re: 2.46

Hi All, (this is a personal note, so any flak should be directed to me only and no one else). While this is in the soon-to-be-released release notes, I felt it's prudent that I post this here. SeaMonkey 2.46 took it's not-so-sweet time in being released due to a plethora of issues (I am so damn

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

David E. Ross wrote: > On 12/22/2016 2:13 AM, Edmund Wong wrote: >> Yes... BELIEVE IT.. It's out! After so many months.. it's out!!! >> >> Reading back on 2.40's post, I wrote it was a 'difficult release'... >> man.. little DID I know. >> >> Erm.. oh wait.

Re: 2.46 version

Pat Connors wrote: > In the interim since the 2.40 breach was discovered, I have been using > 2.47 64 bit with no problems what so ever. Question, when 2.46 is > available for download, should I use it or stay with the 2.47 version? Breach? What breach? Edmund

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

Ant wrote: > Really? How will users know there are updates then? Will they at least > tell them to go to the official web site? > > > On 12/22/2016 1:47 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: >> Just grab the full installer from the website. Update will likely not >> work for any Windows OS in this

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

Edmund Wong wrote: > Yes... BELIEVE IT.. It's out! After so many months.. it's out!!! > > Reading back on 2.40's post, I wrote it was a 'difficult release'... > man.. little DID I know. > > Erm.. oh wait. the formal post... > > After so long a delay, for which we

SeaMonkey 2.46 released

Yes... BELIEVE IT.. It's out! After so many months.. it's out!!! Reading back on 2.40's post, I wrote it was a 'difficult release'... man.. little DID I know. Erm.. oh wait. the formal post... After so long a delay, for which we apologize, the SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the

Re: are there still official seamonkey betas ?

Daniel wrote: > On 15/12/2016 6:40 PM, bdelmee wrote: >> Richmond wrote on 2016-12-14 22:51: >>> bdelmee writes: >>> Hello, I keep seeing people mentioning unofficial dev builds and encouraging us to try those and report any issue before 2.46 comes out.

Re: are there still official seamonkey betas ?

bdelmee wrote: > Hello, I keep seeing people mentioning unoffical dev builds > and encouraging us to try those and report any issue before > 2.46 comes out. > > I am still using 2.38 as 2.40 had an annoying regression for me, > which i'd like to check on the next beta and report if still present.

Re: New 2.46 Windows release candidates

Hi, Fwiw.. please *do* note that those 2.46 candidate builds are just test builds. While it does have the sec fix, it isn't the official candidate until I start spinning build 7. Edmund ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: SeaMonkey v2.46 status updates in blog...

Paul Bergsagel wrote: > Ant wrote: >> https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2016/09/28/2-46/ > Does this mean going forward that future releases will be easier for the > developers to produce or will each release involve this much work? > > BTW thanks for all the hard work getting this release

Re: Seamonkey release?

> > Edmund, > > A good explanation. > > So, here's my question: Are there any Gecko alternatives out there that > aren't changing at a such a furious rate? Something to give us a > reasonable (and safe) SM but perhaps with a more consistent internal > interface that would be simpler to

Re: Seamonkey release?

Stephan Thiele wrote: > Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I don't really understand why > there still is no Seamonkey update after the 2.40 release in March, > almost half a year ago. No. Not a stupid question at all. In fact, it's a very good question. > I am quite confused that there a

Win32 nightlies

Hi, Just wanted to mention that after figuring out bug 1271903 (reason: PEBCAK! PEBCAK! PEBCAK! "kinda"), I've re-enabled to nightlies for trunk and aurora. (Until the next bustage... :P ) Now the update here wrt Release, that is blocked by a patch that needs to be pushed to c-r; but that's

updating to 2.40

Hi Everyone, I apologize for the delay in the updates working. I just want to ask. Are the updates working? As in 2.35..2.39 can be updated to 2.40? I received an email stating that there's still an issue. Thanks Edmund ___ support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.39 -> 2.40

Desiree wrote: > On 4/22/2016 7:08 AM, Gerry Hickman wrote: >> Hi, >> >> My SeaMonkey 2.39 is set to auto-update, but it has not updated to 2.40 >> yet? Even "Help : Check for Updates" says there are no updates >> available... >> > > We are all still waiting for a fix. It affects Windows 64 bit

Re: README, MD5SUM and SHA1SUM

Edmund Wong wrote: > Hi, > > They weren't generated properly at all. Currently fixing them (though, > README is online). > > Once again, sorry for the fubar there.. > > > Edmund > I believe I've fixed this issue. Edmund ___

updates... *finally*?

Hi All, Just wish to announce that I believe the updates are working now. Please confirm. I tried it locally and it looks ok. Edmund ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org

Re: Updates...

Fwiw, I indeedly-do did make a faux-pas... The update step actually wasn't good and yet, I went ahead and pushed to the end. I am certain that this mistake will be rectified, and those responsible will be punished. Those gremlins. ;P Seriously, I'm sorry for the screw up. Working on the fix.

Updates...

Hi, I guess I did screw something up. :( (No surprise there.) The updates are available for OSX64 and it seems it's only the complete one. The partials are also missing and the Linux and Win32 updates went elsewhere or didn't appear where they were supposed to. I'm going back and checking it

Re: No internal updates yet? Re: SeaMonkey 2.40 released

Ant wrote: > On 3/14/2016 9:28 AM, Paul Bergsagel wrote: > ... >> BTW IMPORTANT->the Check for updates menu items is broken on the Mac >> claiming there is no new update. >> >> Please go here to find the update >> http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/ > > No updates found in my very old,

SeaMonkey 2.40 released

Greetings, After so long a delay, for which we apologize, the SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.40! So please check out [1] or [2]. Please note that the website information, while updated for 2.40, still requires a bit more work. We cannot repeat this enough.

Re: Software Update check fails with xml error - Win 7

Rich Gray wrote: > Anyone else seeing this?? > > My Mac and an old XP system just say that there's no update available, > as normal. ewong checked and did not see the problem either. > Should be ok now. Edmund ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: Seamonkey 2.40?

Cruz, Jaime wrote: > Firefox 43 has been out for a bit, and has even gotten three point > upgrades but I haven't seen any mention of a Seamonkey update. Is the > Build Engine broken again? > Sorry for the delay. I've blogged about 2.40.

Re: "Save View as a Folder..." broken

Tom S. wrote: > On 11/18/2015 3:42 AM, Edmund Wong wrote: >> Tom S. wrote: >>> Hi, >>> Before upgrading to the latest version of SeaMonkey (v.2.39), in the >>> mail/newsgroups/blogs window, under View, I could select "Save View as a >>> Folder..

2.39 and system hanging

Hi, Is it just me, or does 2.39 hang a lot? Especially with getting email? After clicking get messages, it'd download the stuff, and then hang for about ten seconds or so and then resume (after switching windows on me). Like say I am in the 3-pane message window. I click on "Get Msgs". It'd

Re: Auto-Update "Something is trying to trick SeaMonkey..."

Gerry Hickman wrote: > Hi, > > I don't fully understand the cause of the issue (client cert, server > cert, string mismatch), but I did notice some about:config values in my > own correctly updated 2.38 version. > > I wonder if they change > app.update.cert.requireBuiltIn > true -> false > would

Re: 2.38b1 -> 2.39b1

Daniel wrote: > On 9/11/2015 1:43 PM, Edmund Wong wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Out of curiosity (despite being a little late), is anyone using >> 2.38b1 and if so, did you get an update for 2.39b1? >> >> I just downloaded 2.38b1 and installed it on a separa

SeaMonkey 2.39 released

Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.39! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.39b1, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.39 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked

2.38b1 -> 2.39b1

Hi, Out of curiosity (despite being a little late), is anyone using 2.38b1 and if so, did you get an update for 2.39b1? I just downloaded 2.38b1 and installed it on a separate system. I did a check for updates, but it got nothing. I'm quite concerned that I might have goofed something up when I

Re: SeaMonkey 2.39 released

Edmund Wong wrote: > Greetings, > > The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey > 2.39! > > For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.39b1, see the What's > New in SeaMonkey 2.39 section of the Release Notes [2], which also > contai

Re: SeaMonkey 2.39b1 released

WaltS48 wrote: > > Short Beta test cycle? > > I see a comm-release build in my RSS feed for comm-release Changelog. > Yes. Currently spinning 2.39. Edmund ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org

SeaMonkey 2.39b1 released

Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.39b1! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.39b1, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.39b1 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked

Re: Support For NPAPI Plugins Ends Next Year

David E. Ross wrote: > Mozilla is ending support for NPAPI plugins by the end on 2016. > Where is this mentioned? Edmund ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

SeaMonkey 2.39 beta GTK3 issues

Hi, Just wondering if anyone has encountered any issues with the GTK3 built version of 2.39. TB and Firefox backed out the necessary manifests[1] in order to build with gtk3 and I'm wondering if it's necessary for us to follow suite. Edmund [1] -

Re: Will there be a 2.38.1?

Cruz, Jaime wrote: > Noticed there were a couple of "point releases" for Firefox and > Thunderbird and was wondering if Seamonkey would be following suit? > I'm not too sure. I haven't heard anything from Callek. Edmund ___ support-seamonkey mailing

SeaMonkey 2.38 released

Greetings, The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.38! For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.38, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.38 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked

Re: Something trying to trick SeaMonkey?

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: > Jay O'Brien wrote: > >> I have 5 computers running Windows 7 and SeaMonkey 2.33.1. My wife >> and I each use one as our primary mail and browsing computer, the >> other three are used primarily to display our cameras, and they all >> have web access. >> >> All five of

SeaMonkey 2.38b1

in SeaMonkey 2.38b1, see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.38b1 section of the Release Notes [2], which also contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org. Thank you Edmund

SeaMonkey 2.35!

Dear All, I'm just so stoked. (This isn't a normal release post as it's just way to special.) It is with great privilege and joy that I can announce to the world, the SeaMonkey Project has just RELEASED SeaMonkey 2.35. SeaMonkey 2.33.1 was released in March. It's now September. Yes, you have

Re: 2.35 update

EE wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Hi, Another update on 2.35. 1) build3 was 'somewhat' done but needs to be rebuilt due to some misconfiguration on my part. It doesn't mean that build3 is a bust. It isn't. It's just that it's uploading the files to the wrong places. (First time

  1   2   >