seamonkey, release 2.48, problem

Hello, Now I installed seamonkey, release 2.48, and I see one problem. If I try to read pages, which have .htaccess and .htpasswd, this new release cannot read these pages and gives following message: Authorization Required This server could not verify that you are authorized to access

Re: Seamonkey release?

On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 7:31:32 PM UTC-7, Edmund Wong wrote: > Stephan Thiele wrote: > > Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I don't really understand why > > there still is no Seamonkey update after the 2.40 release in March, > > almost half a year ago. > > No. Not a stupid

Re: Seamonkey release?

WaltS48 wrote: On 10/12/2016 01:38 AM, sean.nat...@invalid.knights.nee wrote: Stephan Thiele wrote: Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I don't really understand why there still is no Seamonkey update after the 2.40 release in March, almost half a year ago. I am quite confused that there a

Re: Seamonkey release?

On 10/12/2016 01:38 AM, sean.nat...@invalid.knights.nee wrote: Stephan Thiele wrote: Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I don't really understand why there still is no Seamonkey update after the 2.40 release in March, almost half a year ago. I am quite confused that there a nightlies with

Re: Seamonkey release?

Stephan Thiele wrote: Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I don't really understand why there still is no Seamonkey update after the 2.40 release in March, almost half a year ago. I am quite confused that there a nightlies with version numbers increasing to 2.48 while there is not even a

Re: Seamonkey release?

On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 20:18:59 +0200, Stephan Thiele <100.59...@germanynet.de> wrote: >Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I don't really understand why there >still is no Seamonkey update after the 2.40 release in March, almost half a >year ago. >I am quite confused that there a nightlies

Re: Seamonkey release?

Hi, Edmund, thanks a lot for your explanations. I think I understood it’s pretty much to do and it’s difficult enough to merely adapt the changes in basic codebase and infrastructure. Thank you for all the work that you as volunteers put into the project, and hope on .. Stephan

Re: missing scroll buttons in GTK3 builds (was: Seamonkey release?)

NoOp composed on 2016-09-11 19:34 (UTC-0700): Felix Miata wrote: ... Last I tried a version newer than 2.42 I found it unusable due to several GTK3-related bugs, the worst of which 1269145 is WONTFIX, while the others remain open: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1269274

Re: Seamonkey release?

On 9/9/2016 7:23 PM, Felix Miata wrote: > Frank-Rainer Grahl composed on 2016-09-10 00:03 (UTC+0200): > >> In the mean time if you need a new release grab 2.45 from Adrian if you >> are on Windows or Linux. His releases are build from the original >> sources and bug reports against them are

Re: Seamonkey release?

Sun, 11 Sep 2016 07:42:22 -0700 (PDT), 2beesquare: On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 11:19:07 AM UTC-7, Stephan Thiele wrote: Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I don't really understand why there still is no Seamonkey update after the 2.40 release in March, almost half a year ago.

Re: Seamonkey release?

On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 11:19:07 AM UTC-7, Stephan Thiele wrote: > Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I don't really understand why there > still is no Seamonkey update after the 2.40 release in March, almost half a > year ago. > I am quite confused that there a nightlies with

Re: Seamonkey release?

Jupp at best gtk2 is a short time solution but I would still base the next 1-2 releases on it. I didn't follow gtk bugs but 3.21 als was a can of worms a few months ago. 3.22 is supposed to be out soon so this would need to work. On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 23:45:14 +0200, Adrian Kalla wrote: >>W

Re: Seamonkey release?

Adrian Kalla composed on 2016-09-10 23:45 (UTC+0200): GTK2 is a dead horse. GTK2 with Gecko is even more dead. I wouldn't waste any time to let it keep breathing. Just choose a decent GTK3-theme and all your problems will vanish. I never needed any theme but Modern with GTK1 or GTK2. Why

Re: Seamonkey release?

W dniu 09/10/2016 o 05:46 PM, »Q« pisze: >> Agreed but gtk3 itself is a pile of and at some point sticking to >> gtk2 will no longer work ... I use Linux only occasionally but I am >> quite sure this is/will become a problem for Firefox too. 2.45 was >> supposed to use gtk2. I will ask in the next

Re: Seamonkey release?

In , Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > Felix Miata wrote: > > Frank-Rainer Grahl composed on 2016-09-10 00:03 (UTC+0200): > > > >> In the mean time if you need a new release grab 2.45 from Adrian > >> if you are on Windows or Linux.

Re: Seamonkey release?

WaltS48 wrote: Agreed but gtk3 itself is a pile of and at some point sticking to gtk2 will no longer work ... I use Linux only occasionally but I am quite sure this is/will become a problem for Firefox too. 2.45 was supposed to use gtk2. I will ask in the next status meeting if we should switch

Re: Seamonkey release?

On 09/10/2016 04:16 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Felix Miata wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl composed on 2016-09-10 00:03 (UTC+0200): In the mean time if you need a new release grab 2.45 from Adrian if you are on Windows or Linux. His releases are build from the original sources and bug reports

Re: Seamonkey release?

Felix Miata wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl composed on 2016-09-10 00:03 (UTC+0200): In the mean time if you need a new release grab 2.45 from Adrian if you are on Windows or Linux. His releases are build from the original sources and bug reports against them are accepted: Last I tried a version

Re: Seamonkey release?

Ray_Net wrote: Therefore the guy who say that WebMasters should sniff Gecko instead of other part of the Use Agent string are WRONG ! :-) No it just means that building Seamonkey is not possible for a time until the incompatibility is fixed. This is usually the case when you don't see any

Re: Seamonkey release?

Frank-Rainer Grahl composed on 2016-09-10 00:03 (UTC+0200): In the mean time if you need a new release grab 2.45 from Adrian if you are on Windows or Linux. His releases are build from the original sources and bug reports against them are accepted: Last I tried a version newer than 2.42 I

Re: Seamonkey release?

On 09/09/16 6:03 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > Felix Miata wrote: >> WaltS48 composed on 2016-09-09 09:22 (UTC-0400): >> >>> I think the SeaMonkey developers should base the next version on Gecko >>> 45 ESR (which would have been SM 2.42), call it SM 2.45 and bring it up >>> to date with the

Re: Seamonkey release?

Paul Bergsagel wrote on 09/09/2016 02:43: Some of the changes to Gecko are not compatible with Seamonkey. Our Seamonkey programmers do amazing work adapting/reverting Gecko changes made by FireFox programmers so that Seamonky and NOT some offshoot clone of Firefox.I praise the SeaMonkey

Re: Seamonkey release?

Felix Miata wrote: WaltS48 composed on 2016-09-09 09:22 (UTC-0400): I think the SeaMonkey developers should base the next version on Gecko 45 ESR (which would have been SM 2.42), call it SM 2.45 and bring it up to date with the Firefox ESR security and stability releases. I think that would

Re: Seamonkey release?

Edmund Wong wrote: Stephan Thiele wrote: Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I don't really understand why there still is no Seamonkey update after the 2.40 release in March, almost half a year ago. No. Not a stupid question at all. In fact, it's a very good question. I am quite

Re: Seamonkey release?

WaltS48 composed on 2016-09-09 09:22 (UTC-0400): I think the SeaMonkey developers should base the next version on Gecko 45 ESR (which would have been SM 2.42), call it SM 2.45 and bring it up to date with the Firefox ESR security and stability releases. I think that would make it currently SM

Re: Seamonkey release?

On 09/09/2016 03:01 AM, Edmund Wong wrote: Edmund, A good explanation. So, here's my question: Are there any Gecko alternatives out there that aren't changing at a such a furious rate? Something to give us a reasonable (and safe) SM but perhaps with a more consistent internal interface that

Re: Seamonkey release?

Edmund Wong wrote: Edmund, A good explanation. So, here's my question: Are there any Gecko alternatives out there that aren't changing at a such a furious rate? Something to give us a reasonable (and safe) SM but perhaps with a more consistent internal interface that would be simpler to

Re: Seamonkey release?

> > Edmund, > > A good explanation. > > So, here's my question: Are there any Gecko alternatives out there that > aren't changing at a such a furious rate? Something to give us a > reasonable (and safe) SM but perhaps with a more consistent internal > interface that would be simpler to

Re: Seamonkey release?

Edmund Wong wrote: Stephan Thiele wrote: Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I don't really understand why there still is no Seamonkey update after the 2.40 release in March, almost half a year ago. No. Not a stupid question at all. In fact, it's a very good question. I am quite

Re: Seamonkey release?

Stephan Thiele wrote: > Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I don't really understand why > there still is no Seamonkey update after the 2.40 release in March, > almost half a year ago. No. Not a stupid question at all. In fact, it's a very good question. > I am quite confused that there a

Re: Seamonkey release?

Stephan Thiele wrote: Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I don't really understand why there still is no Seamonkey update after the 2.40 release in March, almost half a year ago. I am quite confused that there a nightlies with version numbers increasing to 2.48 while there is not even a

Seamonkey release?

Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I don't really understand why there still is no Seamonkey update after the 2.40 release in March, almost half a year ago. I am quite confused that there a nightlies with version numbers increasing to 2.48 while there is not even a beta. Seamonkey is my

Re: New SeaMonkey Release?

On 05/01/2015 10:48 AM, Rob Steinmetz wrote: I'm sort of aware of the issues with new SeaMonkey releases after 2.33.1. I'm curious if anyone has any idea of when new releases may appear? [SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2015-04-28 -

New SeaMonkey Release?

I'm sort of aware of the issues with new SeaMonkey releases after 2.33.1. I'm curious if anyone has any idea of when new releases may appear? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org

Re: New SeaMonkey Release?

WaltS48 wrote: On 05/01/2015 10:48 AM, Rob Steinmetz wrote: I'm sort of aware of the issues with new SeaMonkey releases after 2.33.1. I'm curious if anyone has any idea of when new releases may appear? [SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2015-04-28 -

Re: SeaMonkey Release Delay(s)

on backing out my effort temporarily to ship another sec/stability release based on teh last full seamonkey release. That sec/stability work would delay our other work here by about a week, but I don't want to leave everyone stranded with regards to security/etc any longer than necessary. If all goes

Re: SeaMonkey Release Delay(s)

another sec/stability release based on teh last full seamonkey release. That sec/stability work would delay our other work here by about a week, but I don't want to leave everyone stranded with regards to security/etc any longer than necessary. If all goes well, I'm expecting to have a final

Re: SeaMonkey Release Delay(s)

of Firefox this cycle. I'm going to concentrate our effort on getting a new beta out the door within a week of Firefox's final release, if for some reason I can't, I'm planning on backing out my effort temporarily to ship another sec/stability release based on teh last full seamonkey release

Re: SeaMonkey Release Delay(s)

Any status update on SM's delay? ;) -- He who cannot pick up an ant, and wants to pick up an elephant will some day see his folly. --African /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o|

Re: SeaMonkey Release Delay(s)

Interviewed by CNN on 21/07/2014 01:28, Justin Wood (Callek) told the world: For the record, I couldn't have said this better myself. (I probably have attempted to many times in the past though) Thank you MCBastos. I'm happy to give what little help I'm able to contribute. Feel free to

Re: SeaMonkey Release Delay(s)

packaged as a deb package. Bernard Justin Wood (Callek) wrote, On 2014-07-21 06:28: For the record, I couldn't have said this better myself. (I probably have attempted to many times in the past though) Thank you MCBastos. ~Justin Wood (Callek) SeaMonkey Council Member SeaMonkey Release Engineer

Re: SeaMonkey Release Delay(s)

For the record, I couldn't have said this better myself. (I probably have attempted to many times in the past though) Thank you MCBastos. ~Justin Wood (Callek) SeaMonkey Council Member SeaMonkey Release Engineer On 7/18/2014 1:39 AM, MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 17/07/2014 16:18

Re: SeaMonkey Release Delay(s)

beta out the door within a week of Firefox's final release, if for some reason I can't, I'm planning on backing out my effort temporarily to ship another sec/stability release based on teh last full seamonkey release. That sec/stability work would delay our other work here

Re: SeaMonkey Release Delay(s)

On 7/19/2014 5:35 AM PT, arnel...@gmail.com typed: For a free application that has a much better user interface than Firefox, I refuse to complain that my current version is a month old. Ditto to that! Don't worry Justin, take the time you need to release next version. Yeah, we don't

Re: SeaMonkey Release Delay(s)

On 7/16/2014 10:30 PM PT, Daniel typed: ... ~Justin Wood (Callek) Thanks for your efforts with this update, Calleck. Any news on a Linux x64 Beta build, or is this somewhere further down the line?? Ditto. We still 3 SM even if they are a little old. :) -- Oh, look what Kyle got me, it's a

Re: SeaMonkey Release Delay(s)

on backing out my effort temporarily to ship another sec/stability release based on teh last full seamonkey release. That sec/stability work would delay our other work here by about a week, but I don't want to leave everyone stranded with regards to security/etc any longer than necessary

Re: SeaMonkey Release Delay(s)

temporarily to ship another sec/stability release based on teh last full seamonkey release. That sec/stability work would delay our other work here by about a week, but I don't want to leave everyone stranded with regards to security/etc any longer than necessary. If all goes well, I'm expecting to have

Re: SeaMonkey Release Delay(s)

effort temporarily to ship another sec/stability release based on teh last full seamonkey release. That sec/stability work would delay our other work here by about a week, but I don't want to leave everyone stranded with regards to security/etc any longer than necessary. If all goes well, I'm

Re: SeaMonkey Release Delay(s)

can't, I'm planning on backing out my effort temporarily to ship another sec/stability release based on teh last full seamonkey release. That sec/stability work would delay our other work here by about a week, but I don't want to leave everyone stranded with regards to security/etc any longer than

Re: SeaMonkey Release Delay(s)

On 7/18/14 4:18 AM, hawker wrote: Why does SM have to stay on such a fast release schedule? What was wrong with the slower schedule of yesteryear? Just because FF and TB do it does SM need to as well? The most important element there is to stay on top of security fixes. As vulnerabilities are

Re: SeaMonkey Release Delay(s)

on backing out my effort temporarily to ship another sec/stability release based on teh last full seamonkey release. That sec/stability work would delay our other work here by about a week, but I don't want to leave everyone stranded with regards to security/etc any longer than necessary. If all goes

Re: SeaMonkey Release Delay(s)

Interviewed by CNN on 17/07/2014 16:18, hawker told the world: Why does SM have to stay on such a fast release schedule? What was wrong with the slower schedule of yesteryear? Just because FF and TB do it does SM need to as well? Sorta. The Firefox people are the ones responsible for Gecko,

SeaMonkey Release Delay(s)

/stability release based on teh last full seamonkey release. That sec/stability work would delay our other work here by about a week, but I don't want to leave everyone stranded with regards to security/etc any longer than necessary. If all goes well, I'm expecting to have a final release, based

Re: SeaMonkey Release Delay(s)

effort temporarily to ship another sec/stability release based on teh last full seamonkey release. That sec/stability work would delay our other work here by about a week, but I don't want to leave everyone stranded with regards to security/etc any longer than necessary. If all goes well, I'm