On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Rich Gray wrote:
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:06:15 -0400
From: Rich Gray rbg_smth...@graysmail.com
To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Newsgroups: mozilla.support.seamonkey, mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey,
mozilla.support.seamonkey, mozilla.dev.planning,
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Graham wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
snip
Instruct them to
install 2.0, migrate their data, then check for updates to newer versions.
Lee
Doesn't SM 2.x automagically check for upgrades??
The first time after launching Seamonkey 2.0 on Windows, hit ^J to
open the download manager, and Seamonkey freezes up for almost a
minute before it opens. Subsequent closing/reopening the download
manager works fine.
This is also seen when clicking a link to download the first time..it
takes ages
On or about 10/28/2009 9:03 PM, BeeNeR typed the following:
On or about 10/28/2009 7:24 PM, Robert Kaiser typed the following:
BeeNeR wrote:
System Win XP up-to-date
I installed SM2.0 and it did not load the all accounts, identities, and
e-mail from the 1.1.18 version. It loaded accounts,
(I'm also 'Rex King' who posted just before this)
At first glance, it seems pretty comprehensive compared to the one on
Firefox- and I considered ditching 'DownThemAll!' which I've been using
on Firefox for a long time.
But it doesn't appear to support multi-segment downloading..can someone
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
I did have a silent unexpected Quit. Attributed to the Crash reporter
System (still having got that thing right on Mac's always has caused
crashes on Mozilla products on Mac). It actually causes crashes on
Steve Wendt wrote:
On 10/28/09 06:21 am, Jay Garcia wrote:
Click in the user name field, then click in it again. It should give
you a drop-down list of saved items.
I think what Ed is talking about is that there is only ONE
login/password for each site, not a list of logins/passwords that
Philip Chee wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:44:54 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote:
It does. As long as its running SM will crash. in SM 1 since I disabled
the reporter I haven't had a Crash in years. SM2 the first time after
going to SM2 Final then importing everything from 1.1.8 which went off
Steve Wendt wrote:
On 10/28/09 10:26 am, Phillip Jones wrote:
Java-script. Must not be too dangerous Adobe acrobat uses it
extensively.
Acrobat also has a lot of security exploits (!).
But related not to Java-script.
A quick Google search suggests otherwise:
Steve Wendt wrote:
On 10/28/09 10:26 am, Phillip Jones wrote:
Java-script. Must not be too dangerous Adobe acrobat uses it
extensively.
Acrobat also has a lot of security exploits (!).
But related not to Java-script.
A quick Google search suggests otherwise:
I have been anticipating SeaMonkey-2, and I downloaded it this morning.
I miss having my Extensions and Themes I had used in version 1.18.
Any idea when More Extensions / AddOns and themes will be available for
version 2?
Is there a generic or template install file that can be edited to
Adam Huffman wrote:
Is there a way of changing an existing mail account's server type from
POP to IMAP?
Or would I have to create a new IMAP account and copy over the
messages in the POP one?
you can not it depends on how your email provider provides
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
robert.ga...@att.net:
The only way I could correct this was to manually edit prefs.js.
There was a line
user_pref(mail.smtpserver.smtp1.auth_method, 1);
which I assumed must be causing the problem. I changed the 1 to 0 and
could then send e-mail.
Broadback wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Your comment is useful as a better way to work around the problem, but
if others have seen (or not) this behavior info would be useful.
I have gone back to 1.1.8 because it keeps asking for my password when
attempting to send
James wrote:
For me it was simple:
1] Download file
2] Click on file
3] Follow instructions
Note that I allowed all of the old profile data to be imported.
I tried that several times. SM never asked about importing
anything. Ended up with no identities. I'll give it one
more go, than
Rex wrote:
But it doesn't appear to support multi-segment downloading..can someone
confirm?
Right, it's just a different user interface for the same download
manager as Firefox has behind the scenes.
Robert Kaiser
___
support-seamonkey mailing
Phillip Jones wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:54:29 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
2) We already know now that 2.1 will not be able to import all the data
from 1.x profiles like 2.0 can, as toolkit development removed some of
the old import code already.
Daniel wrote:
Doesn't SM 2.x automagically check for upgrades??
It does, but it might take up to a day until it does automatically. If
you want to upgrade right away, manually going into Help Check For
Updates... is probably better.
Robert Kaiser
Bret Busby wrote:
Why are these people crossposting to both the mailing lists and all of
the newsgroups that are apparently redirected to the mailing list,
causing the receipt of multiple copies of messages, that some of us
don't want?
Because I messed up the original post and did set yet
John Doue wrote:
More realistically, would not it be better if users would start threads
for specific issues related to SM 2.x, by mentioning SM 2. Issue ...
in the subject line? Anything the moderators can do about this?
You're right, that would be better, but that's completely in the hands
Leonidas Jones wrote:
James wrote:
In case anyone missed it: I believe my post below is wrong and Lee is
right; as I apparently still have the old copy on my hard drive. The old
link apparently was changed to point to the new version and it's at a
slightly different location.
I don't know why
Phillip Jones wrote:
Steve Wendt wrote:
On 10/28/09 10:26 am, Phillip Jones wrote:
Java-script. Must not be too dangerous Adobe acrobat uses it
extensively.
Acrobat also has a lot of security exploits (!).
But related not to Java-script.
A quick Google search suggests otherwise:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
asmpgmr wrote:
Isn't there an early build out there that supports Gecko 1.9.1.x but
still has the SeaMonkey 1.1.x UI ?
And btw, now that wqe have a newer release, 1.1.18 is badly insecure,
80% of all security holes fixed in Gecko 1.9.1.1 to 1.9.1.4 do exist
in SeaMonkey
On Oct 28, 4:26 pm, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote:
asmpgmr wrote:
I've used Mozilla Suite/SeaMonkey 1.x for awhile and never once had a
security problem so I'm really not concerned about this.
I've never seen that volcano spit fire, so it surely must be perfectly
safe to wander its
David L. Ross wrote:
Sorry buts that about as detailed as I can get as to what's wrong.
Mac G4 1.25SP 2GB OS 10.4.11
Was using SM 1.1.14
Zipped the old Mozilla folder in ~/Library just in case.
Ditto renamed SeaMonkey.app to SeaMonkey old.app
Drop installed SM v2
Started it up, it asked me
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John Doue wrote:
snip
Since both 1.xx and 2.x will coexist for a long time, it is more
important than ever to mention the version in the subject line.
I just hope that 1.x will die very fast - to be blunt, it was outdated
to a certain part already when it was
Robert Kaiser wrote:
I've heard more reports of 1.1.x users suddenly losing their whole
profile as I've heard reports of users losing data when migrating to 2.0
But then again, 2.0 was just released, while 1.1.x has existed for a
couple years already. It's not a fair comparison. Also, often
Benoit Renard wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
asmpgmr wrote:
Isn't there an early build out there that supports Gecko 1.9.1.x but
still has the SeaMonkey 1.1.x UI ?
And btw, now that wqe have a newer release, 1.1.18 is badly insecure,
80% of all security holes fixed in Gecko 1.9.1.1 to 1.9.1.4
Robert Kaiser wrote:
This is not our decision, it's the Mozilla toolkit that is dropping
support for that after 3 years of no well-maintained new major release
with that infrastructure - it's just that SeaMonkey did take quite long
to do an actual release based on the new code.
What's
Leonidas Jones wrote:
JD wrote:
This update has not gone that well for me. Now I can't send e-mail. I
get the following error:
Sending of message failed.
An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server
mail.ispname.net. It does not support authentication (SMTP-AUTH) but
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
According to threads previous about developers I though that developers
were made out to be just like regular users? The Comment above proves a
point I tried to make but was scoffed at. Like I said developers either
design for Board of Directors, and
Phillip Jones wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
I did have a silent unexpected Quit. Attributed to the Crash reporter
System (still having got that thing right on Mac's always has caused
crashes on Mozilla products on Mac). It
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Bret Busby wrote:
Why are these people crossposting to both the mailing lists and all of
the newsgroups that are apparently redirected to the mailing list,
causing the receipt of multiple copies of messages, that some of us
don't want?
Because I messed up the original
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John Doue wrote:
More realistically, would not it be better if users would start threads
for specific issues related to SM 2.x, by mentioning SM 2. Issue ...
in the subject line? Anything the moderators can do about this?
You're right, that would be better, but that's
On 10/28/2009 10:38 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
You always make it so hard for me (joke) :-)
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-1.9.1/
[seamonkey-2.0.1pre.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2]
My 64bit tester is still using that w/o issues so far. I wish
Interviewed by CNN on 29/10/2009 13:18, Benoit Renard told the world:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
This is not our decision, it's the Mozilla toolkit that is dropping
support for that after 3 years of no well-maintained new major release
with that infrastructure - it's just that SeaMonkey did take
Benoit Renard wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
They make Java work in Sandbox (whatever that is). Why can't Java-script.
Look up what a sandbox in the context of computers is first so you know
what you're talking about.
I sort of know what it is I am just not a developer and technically
versed
Benoit Renard wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Steve Wendt wrote:
On 10/28/09 10:26 am, Phillip Jones wrote:
Java-script. Must not be too dangerous Adobe acrobat uses it
extensively.
Acrobat also has a lot of security exploits (!).
But related not to Java-script.
A quick Google search
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
You may also need to check Aggressively look for website icons when the
page does not define one.
NO. That preference shouldn't even exist. It enables non-standard
behaviour that pisses people hosting the sites off.
___
Robert Kaiser schrieb:
Thank You very much, Robert.
What I am looking for is a small update instruction.
The Version two was announced yesterday like the previous smaller
updates. But i mean to remember, that for example 1.18 and 2.0 are not
so compatible with the personal options and data.
Phillip Jones wrote:
Benoit Renard wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
They make Java work in Sandbox (whatever that is). Why can't
Java-script.
Look up what a sandbox in the context of computers is first so you know
what you're talking about.
I sort of know what it is I am just not a developer
So I re-installed SM2 without uninstalling 1.1.18.
SM2 installed and started -- with ONLY the Default profile.
WTF?
Nowhere in the process did SM ask me whether I wanted to
import anything. I got no bookmarks, no email addys,
no nothing! What did I do wrong??
How can I get SM 2 to import my 3
therube wrote:
Sounds like this should cover it,
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Software_Update#Software_Update_Failed._The_update_could_not_be_installed
That was it, deleting the files fixed it.
Thank you.
--
Rob
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
On or about 10/29/2009 9:16 AM, cciaffone typed the following:
James wrote:
For me it was simple:
1] Download file
2] Click on file
3] Follow instructions
Note that I allowed all of the old profile data to be imported.
I tried that several times. SM never asked about importing
Benoit Renard wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
asmpgmr wrote:
Isn't there an early build out there that supports Gecko 1.9.1.x but
still has the SeaMonkey 1.1.x UI ?
And btw, now that wqe have a newer release, 1.1.18 is badly insecure,
80% of all security holes fixed in Gecko 1.9.1.1 to 1.9.1.4
I'm having trouble with my bank's billpay. They don't accept the
SeaMonkey 2.0 browser, and it even crashes the browser.
It used to be in SM 1.1.18 that I could spoof IE or Firefox (or even
permanently change the User-Agent in the config file). But now the
Tools menu doesn't even have a
Interviewed by CNN on 29/10/2009 13:01, asmpgmr told the world:
On Oct 28, 4:26 pm, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote:
Feel free to try building this version, I'll try to continue our project
meanwhile, OK?
Clearly you couldn't care less what anyone else thinks if they don't
agree with
I'm not sure [and no expert on anything] but I believe in cases past SM
had picked up an older profile of mine that had been superseded. You
might consider renaming or temporarily relocating any old profiles that
you don't want to delete [after making sure they are in fact older ones]
and try
On 10/28/2009 03:20 AM, Tom Pamin wrote:
Form Manager
I've note used it, but:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.0/
quote
A new form manager replaces all previous web form management, and
automatically keeps a record of what you type into forms and presents
you these options in
I've been working with Seamonkey 2 for a few weeks and I am now finally
getting used to it.
I'd just like to thank you for your hard work.
I can already see the improvements in speed and I'm sure I'll find more
and better things as I work with it more.
My transition from 1.x completely
Benoit Renard wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
I've heard more reports of 1.1.x users suddenly losing their whole
profile as I've heard reports of users losing data when migrating to 2.0
But then again, 2.0 was just released, while 1.1.x has existed for a
couple years already. It's not a fair
I loaded Lightning 1.pre and I don't see how to add the tool bar buttons.
Am I missing something?
Philip Chee wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:47:27 +0100, dominique wrote:
Rob Steinmetz wrote, On 10/28/2009 4:57 PM:
What is the status of getting Lightening to work in Seamonkey?
SM2 works
John Doue wrote:
I nevertheless believe it will take quite some time before SM 2.x offers
the features - or the adequate workarounds for those which are not
replaced - that lots of users appreciate in 1.1.xx. Updating add-ons and
probably creating new ones will also be necessary.
We're trying
Gerd Schweizer wrote:
What I am looking for is a small update instruction.
The Version two was announced yesterday like the previous smaller
updates. But i mean to remember, that for example 1.18 and 2.0 are not
so compatible with the personal options and data.
So i hesitate now installing the
On 10/28/2009 03:50 AM, Mark Banner wrote:
On 28/10/2009 10:30, Lucas Levrel wrote:
My question: is there a way to make it remember only *part* of a form
(e.g. login but not password)? And to make it remember some forms but not
all (e.g. logging-in forms for forums but not for bank accounts)?
Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:05:38 -0400, /cciaffone/:
So I re-installed SM2 without uninstalling 1.1.18.
SM2 installed and started -- with ONLY the Default profile.
WTF?
So have you migrated your SM1 profile the first time you've
installed and run SM2?
Nowhere in the process did SM ask me
Hi,
since the beginning of using SM (after Netscape Suite), when I simply
clicked a link from in the SM mail program, it would open the link in a
new tab from an existing window, and the browser program would NOT be
placed in the foreground, but nicely stay in background too, so I didn't
On 10/28/2009 07:17 AM, Hank wrote:
Installed SeaMonkey 2.0 last night and all looks good except I get no
images displayed in e-mail messages. Where the images should be there
are boxed in or underlined text or symbols. No add-ons and I
uninstalled and reinstalled all plug-ins with latest
I second that emotion [Vista Home Basic 64].
James
.
.
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:03:45 +1100
From: Peter Leep...@melbpc.org.au
To:support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Subject: Re: New SeaMonkey 2 -- Questions
Message-ID:_sydneoci-tcinxxnz2dnuvz_hqdn...@mozilla.org
Content-Type: text/plain;
Bob Minchin wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Bob Minchin wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
u...@domain.invalid wrote:
When i use my windows live hotmail webmail account with seamonkey
1.1.16 and earlier, I can read my email but when I try to compose
mail, I cannot
Ken Rudolph wrote:
I'm having trouble with my bank's billpay. They don't accept the
SeaMonkey 2.0 browser, and it even crashes the browser.
It used to be in SM 1.1.18 that I could spoof IE or Firefox (or even
permanently change the User-Agent in the config file). But now the Tools
menu doesn't
I noticed that when I am in the Seamonkey 2.0 mail composition window and type
in part of a recipient's name, the mail composer's address search function
SOMETIMES displays ONLY the primary e-mail address and the ADDITIONAL
(secondary) e-mail address is not displayed. it appears that the e-mail
Bob Minchin wrote:
Bob Minchin wrote:
Bob Minchin wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Bob Minchin wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
u...@domain.invalid wrote:
When i use my windows live hotmail webmail account with seamonkey
1.1.16 and earlier, I can read my email but
Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:52:35 -0700, /Ken Rudolph/:
I seem to have solved this for the time being by adding Firefox/3.5.4
to the general.useragent.extra.seamonkey line in about:config. Am I
causing any potential permanent harm with this?
You better define one more general.useragent.extra.spoof
Bob Minchin wrote:
Bob Minchin wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Bob Minchin wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
u...@domain.invalid wrote:
When i use my windows live hotmail webmail account with seamonkey
1.1.16 and earlier, I can read my email but when I try to compose
Possibly the signature delimiter which is two dashes
and a space? As in...
--
Jordon
James wrote:
For some reason parts of the downloaded messages are much lighter than
others. For example the message which I've quoted here is totally gray
while the next message in the list is half gray and
chicagofan wrote:
John Doue wrote:
Bottom line is, I do hope you and your team will show consideration and
understanding for the users who will remain faithful to 1.1.xx until
they are comfortable making the switch, especially knowing that, if
IIRC, SM 2.1 will adopt the FF bookmarks system.
Rob Steinmetz wrote:
I loaded Lightning 1.pre and I don't see how to add the tool bar buttons.
Am I missing something?
I don't think it has toolbar icons. It's present in the tab bar if
shown, and it's present in the menu bar (Events and Tasks).
Robert Kaiser
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
JD wrote:
This update has not gone that well for me. Now I can't send e-mail. I
get the following error:
Sending of message failed.
An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server
mail.ispname.net. It does
Robert Kaiser wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
John Doue wrote:
Bottom line is, I do hope you and your team will show consideration and
understanding for the users who will remain faithful to 1.1.xx until
they are comfortable making the switch, especially knowing that, if
IIRC, SM 2.1 will adopt the
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:52:35 -0700, /Ken Rudolph/:
I seem to have solved this for the time being by adding
Firefox/3.5.4 to the general.useragent.extra.seamonkey line in
about:config. Am I causing any potential permanent harm with this?
You better define one more
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rob Steinmetz wrote:
I loaded Lightning 1.pre and I don't see how to add the tool bar buttons.
Am I missing something?
I don't think it has toolbar icons. It's present in the tab bar if
shown, and it's present in the menu bar (Events and Tasks).
Robert Kaiser
After
Robert Kaiser wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
John Doue wrote:
Bottom line is, I do hope you and your team will show consideration and
understanding for the users who will remain faithful to 1.1.xx until
they are comfortable making the switch, especially knowing that, if
IIRC, SM 2.1 will adopt the
I tried this and it worked, but have I done any
damage??
I made a new folder d:/seamonkey2/users
and copied into it my 1.1.18 profile folder so it
looks like this: d:/seamonkey2/users/myname
Then in SM 2 I went into Manage Profiles, selected Create,
and chose that as the folder. Bingo. I have a
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Cecil Bankston wrote:
Is there a built-in function or a compatible addon (such as User Agent
Switcher - not compatible with 2.0) that allows switching user agent in
SM2 for those retarded sites that don't recognize Seamonkey as a secure
browser?
PrefBar has a built in UA
Ken Rudolph wrote:
I'm having trouble with my bank's billpay. They don't accept the
SeaMonkey 2.0 browser, and it even crashes the browser.
Here's the message I get which freezes my browser doesn't even allow
the Back button to operate:
The browser you are using is not currently
Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:23:44 -0400, /cciaffone/:
I tried this and it worked, but have I done any
damage??
I made a new folder d:/seamonkey2/users
and copied into it my 1.1.18 profile folder so it
looks like this: d:/seamonkey2/users/myname
Then in SM 2 I went into Manage Profiles, selected
Robert Kaiser ha scritto:
asmpgmr wrote:
Well the tiny round buttons aren't good. I've never seen any app have
buttons like that, it needs normal buttons. Also what do you perceive
as wrong with the 1.x design ? It looks perfectly fine to me. People
who don't like dialogs can use the download
Evan Davidson wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
JD wrote:
Rufus wrote:
JD wrote:
The password manager in SM version 2 sucks. Password Manager doesn't
fill in the user name or password until I enter the start of it. V
1.1.18 filled it in when I went to a page that had a user name and/or
password..
NoOp wrote:
On 10/28/2009 03:20 AM, Tom Pamin wrote:
Form Manager
I've note used it, but:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.0/
quote
A new form manager replaces all previous web form management, and
automatically keeps a record of what you type into forms and presents
you
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:50:48 -0700 (PDT), therube sjben...@gmail.com wrote:
http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey/browse_thread/thread/7df7143ea152c7f4#
Is this what I'm supposed to do? :
In the location bar, type about:config and press enter. If you get a
scary-looking
Phillip Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
/snip/
To add insult to injury It crashed again a while ago this time as I was
quitting it. Same pattern as before. I'll see if I can figure out where
the error reporter in in
On or about 10/28/2009 9:03 PM, BeeNeR typed the following:
On or about 10/28/2009 7:24 PM, Robert Kaiser typed the following:
BeeNeR wrote:
System Win XP up-to-date
I installed SM2.0 and it did not load the all accounts, identities, and
e-mail from the 1.1.18 version. It loaded accounts,
On or about 10/29/2009 7:12 AM, BeeNeR typed the following:
SNIP
Image of this window can be found in mozilla.support.screenshots
Evidently the moderator of mozilla.support.screenshots is on vacation.
The screenshot has not appeared as yet.
--
Ed
As a practical
On 10/29/2009 8:52 AM, Ken Rudolph wrote:
Ken Rudolph wrote:
I'm having trouble with my bank's billpay. They don't accept the
SeaMonkey 2.0 browser, and it even crashes the browser.
It used to be in SM 1.1.18 that I could spoof IE or Firefox (or even
permanently change the User-Agent in the
On 10/29/2009 09:41 AM, dirk wrote:
Hi,
since the beginning of using SM (after Netscape Suite), when I simply
clicked a link from in the SM mail program, it would open the link in a
new tab from an existing window, and the browser program would NOT be
placed in the foreground, but
On or about 10/29/2009 3:39 PM, BeeNeR typed the following:
On or about 10/29/2009 7:12 AM, BeeNeR typed the following:
SNIP
Image of this window can be found in mozilla.support.screenshots
Evidently the moderator of mozilla.support.screenshots is on vacation.
The
cciaffone wrote:
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Haven't you tried:
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_migration_-_SeaMonkey#Manually_starting_profile_migration
Yes I have. I enter the command in the Run box. SM starts in
Profile Manager. Not even a hint of the migration wizard.
Hey!! I ran
I normally save copies of online invoices and other data using the SAVE
AS feature in the Save Page As, Save Target As and Save Image As. I see
that all three have been removed from SM 2.0.
This presents a real inconvenience in that I can no longed edit on line
and then save to a file name I
stango wrote:
I normally save copies of online invoices and other data using the SAVE
AS feature in the Save Page As, Save Target As and Save Image As. I see
that all three have been removed from SM 2.0.
This presents a real inconvenience in that I can no longed edit on line
and then save to a
Bob Minchin wrote:
Bob Minchin wrote:
Bob Minchin wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Bob Minchin wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
u...@domain.invalid wrote:
When i use my windows live hotmail webmail account with seamonkey
1.1.16 and earlier, I can read my email but
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/29/2009 8:52 AM, Ken Rudolph wrote:
Ken Rudolph wrote:
I'm having trouble with my bank's billpay. They don't accept the
SeaMonkey 2.0 browser, and it even crashes the browser.
It used to be in SM 1.1.18 that I could spoof IE or Firefox (or even
permanently change
cciaffone wrote:
cciaffone wrote:
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Haven't you tried:
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_migration_-_SeaMonkey#Manually_starting_profile_migration
Yes I have. I enter the command in the Run box. SM starts in
Profile Manager. Not even a hint of the migration
So apparently SM 2.0's profile is in a new folder called Application
Data|Mozilla|SeaMonkey|Profiles. I believe my old SM 1.1.18 profile
is in Application Data|Mozilla|Profiles|default. I backed up that
folder to another hard drive yesterday, just in case. I've also
uninstalled SM 1.1.18.
Ken Rudolph wrote:
So apparently SM 2.0's profile is in a new folder called Application
Data|Mozilla|SeaMonkey|Profiles. I believe my old SM 1.1.18 profile is
in Application Data|Mozilla|Profiles|default. I backed up that folder to
another hard drive yesterday, just in case. I've also
cciaffone wrote:
cciaffone wrote:
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Haven't you tried:
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_migration_-_SeaMonkey#Manually_starting_profile_migration
Yes I have. I enter the command in the Run box. SM starts in
Profile Manager. Not even a hint of the migration
Leonidas Jones wrote:
roger.me...@adm.unige.ch wrote:
David L. Ross wrote:
Sorry buts that about as detailed as I can get as to what's wrong.
Mac G4 1.25SP 2GB OS 10.4.11
Was using SM 1.1.14
Zipped the old Mozilla folder in ~/Library just in case.
Ditto renamed SeaMonkey.app to SeaMonkey
desertgal wrote:
cciaffone wrote:
cciaffone wrote:
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Haven't you tried:
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_migration_-_SeaMonkey#Manually_starting_profile_migration
Yes I have. I enter the command in the Run box. SM starts in
Profile Manager. Not even a hint of
On 10/29/09 12:36, BeeNeR wrote:
Today I again made sure there was only one profile on my disk. I
uninstalled SM2, deleted the Program Files/SeaMonkey directory,
rebooted, uninstalled SM1.1.18, deleted the Program Files/mozilla.org
directory, rebooted, ran two different registry
NoOp wrote:
On 10/29/2009 09:41 AM, dirk wrote:
Hi,
since the beginning of using SM (after Netscape Suite), when I simply
clicked a link from in the SM mail program, it would open the link in a
new tab from an existing window, and the browser program would NOT be
placed in the foreground, but
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
