Rufus wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:00:23 -0700, Rufus wrote:
5) If I customize the Toolbar for Mail and Newsgroups by adding the
Delete button, the button is hidden upon exit from Customize - again,
this is only true when using the default theme.
If you select/highlight
scott wrote:
hello,
Finally I figured out to talk to you people hope this works
using seamonkey 2.0
first let me tell you this has been a problem way back to netscape
7.2, I have one sender that sends me stuff and it can never be
forwarded, even now if he sends me a wmv , seamonk
Cruz, Jaime wrote:
Damn it. Just saw the posting on the website:
http://coralietab.mozdev.org/index.html
I've got the experimental version installed and it works for the most
part, but there are some bugs that'll probably never be fixed now.
What's the deal with the NPAPI plug in anyway??
In previous versions/editions of SM email would not be retrieved until I
started the email program. In 2.0 mail is loaded when I start the
browser. This might not seem to be a problem but let me explain.
I have a laptop that I use when I travel. This week I started it to
install new software
Daniel wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:00:23 -0700, Rufus wrote:
5) If I customize the Toolbar for Mail and Newsgroups by adding the
Delete button, the button is hidden upon exit from Customize - again,
this is only true when using the default theme.
If you
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Mike C wrote:
Sqwertz wrote:
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:11:15 -0800, Ant wrote:
/snip/
To whom it may concern: I am wondering whatever happened to the calendar
that was supposed to be either an extension or an
How to set the displayed date format to day/month/year, instead of the
default month/day/year? Tried the GB english language pack, can't find
any option under preference or about:config.
Thanks in advance.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
Phillip Jones wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Mike C wrote:
Sqwertz wrote:
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:11:15 -0800, Ant wrote:
/snip/
To whom it may concern: I am wondering whatever happened to the
calendar
that was supposed to be
Hi!
I noticed some web pages mess up when I use minimal font size like at 14
since my eye sights suck. :(
I used to use PrefBar's font size and hotkeys (ctrl = and ctrl -), but
they seem to increase and decrease zoom levels for the whole web pages
in SM v2.
Is there a way to do it only
Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:31:43 -0800, /Ant/:
I noticed some web pages mess up when I use minimal font size like at 14
since my eye sights suck. :(
I used to use PrefBar's font size and hotkeys (ctrl = and ctrl -), but
they seem to increase and decrease zoom levels for the whole web pages
in SM v2.
On 11/29/2009 8:49 AM PT, Stanimir Stamenkov typed:
I noticed some web pages mess up when I use minimal font size like at 14
since my eye sights suck. :(
I used to use PrefBar's font size and hotkeys (ctrl = and ctrl -), but
they seem to increase and decrease zoom levels for the whole web
Daniel wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:00:23 -0700, Rufus wrote:
5) If I customize the Toolbar for Mail and Newsgroups by adding the
Delete button, the button is hidden upon exit from Customize - again,
this is only true when using the default theme.
If you
JAS wrote:
Dancin' Fool wrote:
Whatever mind-altering drugs inspired JASjaskin...@bbc.net on Sun,
08 Nov 2009 11:15:11 -0700 to write:
I used a theme, Walnut by Alfred Kayser years ago and wonder if it could
be updated for use with SM 2.0. I really liked it and was easy on my
eyes.
Alfred
On 11/29/2009 8:49 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:31:43 -0800, /Ant/:
I noticed some web pages mess up when I use minimal font size like at 14
since my eye sights suck. :(
I used to use PrefBar's font size and hotkeys (ctrl = and ctrl -), but
they seem to increase and
Mr. Cheese wrote:
In previous versions/editions of SM email would not be retrieved until I
started the email program. In 2.0 mail is loaded when I start the
browser. (...)
Is there a setting that I couldn't find to suppress retrieval until the
email program is started?
Edit/Preferences/Mail
On 11/29/2009 9:41 AM PT, David Wilkinson typed:
Ant wrote:
Preferences: Appearance / Content
[x] Zoom only text instead of full pages
Note, this is a global and not per site setting.
Thanks! :)
Ant:
As pointed out to me by Stanimir, an extension that gives improved
control over the
Leonidas Jones wrote:
desertgal wrote:
I checked the settings, unchecked the secure authorization it still
won't connect. I went to the link above installed the telnet client,
but it still comes up connection refused. FINALLY, I just tried
disabling the firewall it connected. I guess the
I am unable to send e-mail with seamonkey 2.0 when I click send it pops
up an box saying:
Sending of message failed.
An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server
mail.bellsouth.net. It does not support authentication (SMTP-AUTH) but
you have chosen to use
Ever time I go to a site that I have never Been to, I have ADD their
Certificate to the list Manually .Preference / privacy amd security/
certificates/ manage certificates .
What should I have Click in Preference / privacy amd security
/validation ...
u...@domain.invalid wrote:
I am unable to send e-mail with seamonkey 2.0 when I click send it pops
up an box saying:
Sending of message failed.
An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server
mail.bellsouth.net. It does not support authentication (SMTP-AUTH) but
you have
Sqwertz wrote:
There is an IETab available already:
http://coralietab.mozdev.org/installation.html
I've tried installing it and it doesn't work. IETab appears to be
dead.
http://coralietab.mozdev.org/
Which is too bad. I will have to rethink my if usage of Seamonkey
without IE TAB is
That's just it. I don't have any connection security listed (the box
shows none) or the authentication box checked. So why am I getting this
message and why won't my mail go out?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
u...@domain.invalid wrote:
That's just it. I don't have any connection security listed (the box
shows none) or the authentication box checked. So why am I getting this
message and why won't my mail go out?
I think we both are in the same situation as far sa seamonkey 2.0 ..
Time to go Back
scott wrote:
[...]I see some eml thing and the wmv in the attachments [pane??]
... but it is useless... his stuff is unforwardable
Both of those are M$'s proprietary crap.
Their whole purpose for existing IS TO BE INCOMPATIBLE.
Previous discussion on this:
ST wrote:
Is anyone else having trouble viewing breitbart pages.
That site is a steaming pile.
It doesn't even pass the pre-test:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://breitbart.com
...unable to validate this document
because on line 119 it contained
one or more bytes that I cannot interpret
Please post in this newsgroup, When a Good working version of seamonkey
2.X is available . 2.0 is real Buggy . It needs to be Marked as BETA
Time for me to go back to 1.1.18
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:36:29 -0500, Bush e...@elmie.uk in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
u...@domain.invalid wrote:
I am unable to send e-mail with seamonkey 2.0 when I click send it pops
up an box saying:
Sending of message failed.
An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to
jim wrote:
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:36:29 -0500, Bushe...@elmie.uk in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
u...@domain.invalid wrote:
I am unable to send e-mail with seamonkey 2.0 when I click send it pops
up an box saying:
Sending of message failed.
An error occurred sending mail: Unable to
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:51:51 -0600, u...@domain.invalid in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
That's just it. I don't have any connection security listed (the box
shows none) or the authentication box checked. So why am I getting this
message and why won't my mail go out?
See the last suggestion
Bush wrote:
Please post in this newsgroup, When a Good working version of seamonkey
2.X is available . 2.0 is real Buggy . It needs to be Marked as BETA
Time for me to go back to 1.1.18
The best attitude you can do is to avoid trying to use a new
version/design ... too earlier.
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 17:00:14 -0500, Bush e...@elmie.uk in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
Please post in this newsgroup, When a Good working version of seamonkey
2.X is available . 2.0 is real Buggy . It needs to be Marked as BETA
Time for me to go back to 1.1.18
The funny thing is, I am
I'm working with Mac OS 10.6.2, and SM 1.1.18.
In the last several days, my _Inbox_ shows message count discrepancies with
what the upper left folder window indicates (say 15 messages unread, and 2484
total messages) and what actually shows up in the main message window, when I
select to
Hi:
I don't use the browser, but while trying to figure out the problem with email
not showing images have discovered that the browser does not show anything.
How to get the email program to display images (.gif .jpeg) ?
--
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
http://www.prc68.com
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:21:16 -0800, desertgal desertg...@hudnuts3.com in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Edward wrote:
desertgal wrote:
I'm trying to set up a POP account. It's just a regular gmail address.
It's set up in Outlook Express on the
u...@domain.invalid wrote:
I am unable to send e-mail with seamonkey 2.0 when I click send it pops
up an box saying:
Sending of message failed.
An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server
mail.bellsouth.net. It does not support authentication (SMTP-AUTH) but
you have
Rickles wrote:
Cruz, Jaime wrote:
Damn it. Just saw the posting on the website:
http://coralietab.mozdev.org/index.html
I've got the experimental version installed and it works for the most
part, but there are some bugs that'll probably never be fixed now.
What's the deal with the NPAPI
On 11/29/2009 9:41 AM PT, David Wilkinson typed:
Preferences: Appearance / Content
[x] Zoom only text instead of full pages
Note, this is a global and not per site setting.
Thanks! :)
Ant:
As pointed out to me by Stanimir, an extension that gives improved
control over the zoom feature is
Ant wrote:
On 11/29/2009 9:41 AM PT, David Wilkinson typed:
Ant wrote:
Preferences: Appearance / Content
[x] Zoom only text instead of full pages
Note, this is a global and not per site setting.
Thanks! :)
Ant:
As pointed out to me by Stanimir, an extension that gives improved
control
On 11/29/2009 5:07 PM PT, Frosted Flake typed:
As pointed out to me by Stanimir, an extension that gives improved
control over the zoom feature is nosquint:
http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmisc.html#nosquint
Thanks. I will check it out. I hate changing sizes for every damn site!
Ugh.
Bush wrote:
Ever time I go to a site that I have never Been to, I have ADD their
Certificate to the list Manually .Preference / privacy amd security/
certificates/ manage certificates .
What should I have Click in Preference / privacy amd security
/validation ...
I got ris of seamonkey 2.0
http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/8485/screenshotfi.gif on what I saw.
This seems like a bug in SeaMonkey v2. You don't need an account either
to reproduce it. Just set it up for nntp.earthlink.net server, restart
SeaMonkey, and make it access this newsgroup/usenet server.
I already tried
Bush wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Bush wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Bush:
I do not want any tabs in seamonkey 2.0 . How do I get rid of
the
TABS.
I have
Bush wrote:
Please post in this newsgroup, When a Good working version of seamonkey
2.X is available . 2.0 is real Buggy . It needs to be Marked as BETA
Time for me to go back to 1.1.18
I am now back to Seamonkey 1.1.18 ... I uninstalled the Beta version of 2.x
Bush wrote:
A US A site is not accessible with Seamonkey 2.0
http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/
Here is the fix
#1 uninstall seamonkey 2.x BETA
#2 reinstall seamonkey 1.1.18
And the site is Viewable
But wait for seamonket 2.5 to be released and try again .
jim wrote:
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 17:00:14 -0500, Bush e...@elmie.uk in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
Please post in this newsgroup, When a Good working version of seamonkey
2.X is available . 2.0 is real Buggy . It needs to be Marked as BETA
Time for me to go back to 1.1.18
The funny
jim wrote:
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:51:51 -0600, u...@domain.invalid in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
That's just it. I don't have any connection security listed (the box
shows none) or the authentication box checked. So why am I getting this
message and why won't my mail go out?
See the
Hello again,
Well that was an experience... I received 46 emails back (
counting) , not all regarding my 2 little problems but I got the idea
how to fix them.
As suggested by 3% of the responses , I have gone back to ver 1118.
I must tell you that was an experience as well. Seamonkey 2
Ray_Net wrote:
Bush wrote:
Please post in this newsgroup, When a Good working version of seamonkey
2.X is available . 2.0 is real Buggy . It needs to be Marked as BETA
Time for me to go back to 1.1.18
The best attitude you can do is to avoid trying to use a new
version/design ... too
Bush wrote:
Bush wrote:
Please post in this newsgroup, When a Good working version of
seamonkey 2.X is available . 2.0 is real Buggy . It needs to be
Marked as BETA
Time for me to go back to 1.1.18
I am now back to Seamonkey 1.1.18 ... I uninstalled the Beta version
of 2.x
To Bush, and
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:43:24 -0500, Bush e...@elmie.uk in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
jim wrote:
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 17:00:14 -0500, Bush e...@elmie.uk in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
Please post in this newsgroup, When a Good working version of seamonkey
2.X is available . 2.0 is
Conditions
1) Please only Linux/Unix users reply as this is likely a Unix specific
problem.
2) Seamonkey called from terminals by user through SSH, runs on server.
3) Also, some of my mail accounts are reaching the 2GB limit, but I
checked to see that the filesystem is 2GB capable.
4) Using
On 11/29/2009 5:34 PM, Ant wrote:
http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/8485/screenshotfi.gif on what I saw.
This seems like a bug in SeaMonkey v2. You don't need an account either
to reproduce it. Just set it up for nntp.earthlink.net server, restart
SeaMonkey, and make it access this
On 11/29/2009 5:40 PM, Bush wrote:
Bush wrote:
A US A site is not accessible with Seamonkey 2.0
http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/
Here is the fix
#1 uninstall seamonkey 2.x BETA
#2 reinstall seamonkey 1.1.18
And the site is Viewable
But wait for seamonket 2.5 to be released and
David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/29/2009 5:40 PM, Bush wrote:
Bush wrote:
A US A site is not accessible with Seamonkey 2.0
http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/
Here is the fix
#1 uninstall seamonkey 2.x BETA
#2 reinstall seamonkey 1.1.18
And the site is Viewable
But wait for seamonket 2.5 to be
Sqwertz wrote:
Upon install: Corel IE Tab is 1.6xxx is not compatible with
Seamonkey 2.0
Happy now?
Did you install version 1.69.20091026, or a different version? Because
version 1.69.20091026 DEFINITELY installs on Seamonkey 2.0. I've
installed it on three different machines so
Evan Davidson wrote:
Rickles wrote:
Cruz, Jaime wrote:
Damn it. Just saw the posting on the website:
http://coralietab.mozdev.org/index.html
I've got the experimental version installed and it works for the most
part, but there are some bugs that'll probably never be fixed now.
What's the deal
Ran into an interesting problem today; ATT (my isp) had issues with
their email server today. I opened up SM 2.0 (linux) and found that all
but one account (this one) were working. I couldn't send msgs, couldn't
receive msgs etc. I couldn not even log on to the ATT webmail.
So... I bit the bullet
Bush wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/29/2009 5:40 PM, Bush wrote:
Bush wrote:
A US A site is not accessible with Seamonkey 2.0
http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/
Here is the fix
#1 uninstall seamonkey 2.x BETA
#2 reinstall seamonkey 1.1.18
And the site is Viewable
But wait for
NoOp:
So it appears that there is something in the 2.0 password routine that
gets stuck when it gets a refused password or error from the isp side.
I'm not sure how to test further.
If you could get a log that would be helpful.
https://wiki.mozilla.org/MailNews:Logging
Hartmut
On 11/29/2009 08:35 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
NoOp:
So it appears that there is something in the 2.0 password routine that
gets stuck when it gets a refused password or error from the isp side.
I'm not sure how to test further.
If you could get a log that would be helpful.
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Bush wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/29/2009 5:40 PM, Bush wrote:
Bush wrote:
A US A site is not accessible with Seamonkey 2.0
http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/
Here is the fix
#1 uninstall seamonkey 2.x BETA
#2 reinstall seamonkey 1.1.18
And the site is Viewable
ST wrote:
Is anyone else having trouble viewing breitbart pages.
That site is a steaming pile.
It doesn't even pass the pre-test:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://breitbart.com
...unable to validate this document
because on line 119 it contained
one or more bytes that I cannot
Bush wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Bush wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/29/2009 5:40 PM, Bush wrote:
Bush wrote:
/snip/
On the SeaMonkey 1.1.18 menu bar, select [Help About SeaMonkey].
Under the large-type link for SeaMonkey 1.1.18 at
the top of the page, do you see the following:
On 11/29/2009 08:41 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 11/29/2009 08:35 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
NoOp:
So it appears that there is something in the 2.0 password routine that
gets stuck when it gets a refused password or error from the isp side.
I'm not sure how to test further.
If you could get a log that
Hi.
http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/4025/screenshotph.gif from SeaMonkey
v2.0 in my updated Windows XP Pro. SP3. I noticed I could highlight the
texts. I accidently clicked on it, typed my password (not shown --
whew), and hit enter. I was wondering why it didn't work.
Thank you in
My SM 2.0 and FF 3.0.10 are extremely slowno matter what I'm trying
to do. Like 10 to 20 minutes (dialup) to open a webpage! IE,
however, gets there lickety-split! Any ideas what might be happening?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
66 matches
Mail list logo
