Re: SM 2.0 Posts Missing in mozilla.support.seamonkey (but they're on Google)

2009-10-21 Thread Jens Hatlak
Bob Fleischer wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Bob Fleischer wrote: Gerry Hickman wrote: Ah! It's got the "follow-up" flag set! That explains a lot:) It certainly would be a usability improvement if SeaMonkey did something (probably as an option) to grab one's attention in this case. With any co

Re: SM 2.0 Posts Missing in mozilla.support.seamonkey (but they're on Google)

2009-10-21 Thread Robert Kaiser
Bob Fleischer wrote: Perhaps we need a "usability" forum to work out such ideas? The group here is good for this discussion. I really have not taken the time (nor do I really have the time if it is substantial) to become familiar with the bug reporting mechanism. How strict is the definition

Re: SM 2.0 Posts Missing in mozilla.support.seamonkey (but they're on Google)

2009-10-21 Thread Gerry Hickman
Bob Fleischer wrote: File a bug on that? Any ideas what to do and how to provide maximum usability and minimum intrusion for users would be nice! I really have not taken the time (nor do I really have the time if it is substantial) to become familiar with the bug reporting mechanism. How stri

Re: SM 2.0 Posts Missing in mozilla.support.seamonkey (but they're on Google)

2009-10-21 Thread Bob Fleischer
Robert Kaiser wrote: Bob Fleischer wrote: Gerry Hickman wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Did you look into mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey - where the posts actually did go to? Ah! It's got the "follow-up" flag set! That explains a lot:) It certainly would be a usability improvement if SeaMonkey di

Re: SM 2.0 Posts Missing in mozilla.support.seamonkey (but they're on Google)

2009-10-21 Thread Robert Kaiser
Bob Fleischer wrote: Gerry Hickman wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Did you look into mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey - where the posts actually did go to? Ah! It's got the "follow-up" flag set! That explains a lot:) It certainly would be a usability improvement if SeaMonkey did something (probably

Re: SM 2.0 Posts Missing in mozilla.support.seamonkey (but they're on Google)

2009-10-21 Thread Bob Fleischer
Gerry Hickman wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Did you look into mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey - where the posts actually did go to? Ah! It's got the "follow-up" flag set! That explains a lot:) It certainly would be a usability improvement if SeaMonkey did something (probably as an option) to grab

Re: SM 2.0 Posts Missing in mozilla.support.seamonkey (but they're on Google)

2009-10-21 Thread Gerry Hickman
Robert Kaiser wrote: Did you look into mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey - where the posts actually did go to? Ah! It's got the "follow-up" flag set! That explains a lot:) -- Gerry Hickman (London UK) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@li

Re: SM 2.0 Posts Missing in mozilla.support.seamonkey (but they're on Google)

2009-10-21 Thread Robert Kaiser
Gerry Hickman wrote: Hi, I'm reading this NG from the newsreader in SM2.0 Beta2. In general, everything looks normal, but I noticed my reply to Robert Kaiser's message "SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 2" of 19 Oct 2009 did not appear in the newsreader. This message appears after "Windows 7?" and

Re: SM 2.0 Posts Missing in mozilla.support.seamonkey (but they're on Google)

2009-10-20 Thread Martin Freitag
Gerry Hickman schrieb: > Hi, > > I'm reading this NG from the newsreader in SM2.0 Beta2. In general, > everything looks normal, but I noticed my reply to Robert Kaiser's > message "SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 2" of 19 Oct 2009 did not > appear in the newsreader. This message appears after "Win