Original Message
Perhaps the picture is created by copy/paste into the mail and not
attached ... so visible in html mode and invisible in text mode.
I've had that happen to my recipients - so now I'll do both (which is a
waste).
Daniel wrote:
Richmond wrote on 13/05/18 04:32:
Ray_Net wrote:
Why must TB or SM show a part of the HTML part when reading exclusively
in plain-text.
If you position your option to plain-text-only don't expect to reach the
HTML part ...
Permitting to access the html part is an aberration ...
Richmond wrote on 13/05/18 04:32:
Ray_Net wrote:
Why must TB or SM show a part of the HTML part when reading exclusively
in plain-text.
If you position your option to plain-text-only don't expect to reach the
HTML part ...
Permitting to access the html part is an aberration ...
If you want to
Ray_Net wrote:
> Why must TB or SM show a part of the HTML part when reading exclusively
> in plain-text.
> If you position your option to plain-text-only don't expect to reach the
> HTML part ...
> Permitting to access the html part is an aberration ...
>
> If you want to see the attachment
On 5/9/2018 2:40 PM, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
> NoOp wrote:
>> On 5/8/2018 12:32 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
>>> NoOp wrote on 08-05-18 19:03:
Have you tried the already included:
View|Message Body As|All Body Parts
that is included in both SeaMonkey and Thunderbird?
NoOp wrote:
On 5/8/2018 12:32 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
NoOp wrote on 08-05-18 19:03:
Have you tried the already included:
View|Message Body As|All Body Parts
that is included in both SeaMonkey and Thunderbird?
I did not have that option for "Message Body As" I have only those 3
choices:
-
On 5/8/2018 12:32 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
> NoOp wrote on 08-05-18 19:03:
>> On 5/8/2018 1:31 AM, Richmond wrote:
>>> Richmond wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
> Richmond wrote on 07-05-18 11:54:
>> The same thing occurs in Thunderbird. I suppose you could argue that if
>> you want to display the
Frank-Rainer Grahl:
>It builds but that is about all :)
>
>Didin't try today. Mozilla just removed another few bits from Gecko and jorgk
>just pushed a bustage fixe for mailnews.
The new build succeeded. The first SM 2.59. :)
Hartmut
___
Wed, 9 May 2018 08:04:01 +0200, _Ray_Net_:
Richmond wrote on 08-05-18 22:21:
Bugzilla isn't just for bugs though, it's for change requests too. The
fact that it is working correctly doesn't mean it is useful or should
never be changed.
Why must TB or SM show a part of the HTML part when
It builds but that is about all :)
Didin't try today. Mozilla just removed another few bits from Gecko and jorgk
just pushed a bustage fixe for mailnews.
FRG
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Frank-Rainer Grahl:
We really need to fix the current bustages first...
Well, yesterday a build of SM-Trunk
Frank-Rainer Grahl:
>We really need to fix the current bustages first...
Well, yesterday a build of SM-Trunk on Linux x86_64 succeeded. After a
relative long time of bustages. But building is broken again. :)
Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
Richmond wrote on 08-05-18 22:21:
Ray_Net wrote:
Richmond wrote on 08-05-18 10:02:
Ray_Net wrote:
Richmond wrote on 07-05-18 11:54:
The same thing occurs in Thunderbird. I suppose you could argue that if
you want to display the body as plain text, then it should have no
interpretation of
Ray_Net wrote:
> Richmond wrote on 08-05-18 10:02:
>> Ray_Net wrote:
>>> Richmond wrote on 07-05-18 11:54:
The same thing occurs in Thunderbird. I suppose you could argue that if
you want to display the body as plain text, then it should have no
interpretation of embedded headers at
Richmond wrote on 08-05-18 10:02:
Ray_Net wrote:
Richmond wrote on 07-05-18 11:54:
The same thing occurs in Thunderbird. I suppose you could argue that if
you want to display the body as plain text, then it should have no
interpretation of embedded headers at all, as that would be more secure.
NoOp wrote on 08-05-18 19:03:
On 5/8/2018 1:31 AM, Richmond wrote:
Richmond wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Richmond wrote on 07-05-18 11:54:
The same thing occurs in Thunderbird. I suppose you could argue that if
you want to display the body as plain text, then it should have no
interpretation of
Richmond wrote:
OK I have recreated the problem as follows:
On my iPhone, I created a spreadsheet using the Numbers app. (I don't
think it matters what the attachment is, this is just an example). I
then sent this to myself by email. (It is not obvious [to me] how to do
this, I searched for it,
On 5/8/2018 1:31 AM, Richmond wrote:
> Richmond wrote:
>> Ray_Net wrote:
>>> Richmond wrote on 07-05-18 11:54:
The same thing occurs in Thunderbird. I suppose you could argue that if
you want to display the body as plain text, then it should have no
interpretation of embedded
On 5/8/2018 at 12:07 PM, Ray_Net created this epitome of digital genius:
Ok, Ok, but if the correction is possible thru an addon, It would be not
so difficult to put the code of the addon into the source of TB.
I did not know what a "bustage" is google-translate cannot help me in
french.
Ok, Ok, but if the correction is possible thru an addon, It would be not
so difficult to put the code of the addon into the source of TB.
I did not know what a "bustage" is google-translate cannot help me in
french.
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 08-05-18 17:09:
... they are VERY VERY FEW
... they are VERY VERY FEW volunteers
And shared mailnews code. If the TB devs don't think it can be fixed easy I
wouldn't even touch it. We really need to fix the current bustages first or
you won't see another SeaMonkey after the last 2.49.x.
FRG
Ray_Net wrote:
That's not normal to
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote on 08-05-18 14:40:
Tue, 8 May 2018 09:31:58 +0100, _Richmond_:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/thunderbird/addon/show-all-body-parts/
called "show all body parts" - an unfortunate name. :)
Nice one – thanks for the reference.
That's not normal to oblige us to
Tue, 8 May 2018 09:31:58 +0100, _Richmond_:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/thunderbird/addon/show-all-body-parts/
called "show all body parts" - an unfortunate name. :)
Nice one – thanks for the reference.
--
Stanimir
___
support-seamonkey
Richmond wrote:
> Ray_Net wrote:
>> Richmond wrote on 07-05-18 11:54:
>>> The same thing occurs in Thunderbird. I suppose you could argue that if
>>> you want to display the body as plain text, then it should have no
>>> interpretation of embedded headers at all, as that would be more secure.
>>>
Ray_Net wrote:
> Richmond wrote on 07-05-18 11:54:
>> The same thing occurs in Thunderbird. I suppose you could argue that if
>> you want to display the body as plain text, then it should have no
>> interpretation of embedded headers at all, as that would be more secure.
>> But it doesn't do that
Richmond wrote on 07-05-18 11:54:
The same thing occurs in Thunderbird. I suppose you could argue that if
you want to display the body as plain text, then it should have no
interpretation of embedded headers at all, as that would be more secure.
But it doesn't do that either, unless you use
Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 06-05-18 00:34:
Ray_Net wrote:
It's normal that the attachment is available when you send a
plain-text mail with an attachment...
but try to compose and send an HTML mail with a copy/paste on the
content of a picture instead of adding an attachment - then the guy
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 6 May 2018 14:31:34 -0400, _Paul B. Gallagher_:
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
It depends on how the client handles it, and Ray is not correct for
SeaMonkey at least. If you View -> Message Body As -> Plain Text on
an HTML message with an embedded image – the image
Mon, 7 May 2018 18:17:47 +0300, _Stanimir Stamenkov_:
Mon, 7 May 2018 09:17:46 +0100, _Richmond_:
I can see the image on your article without problem. It does not say
it is an attachment though, and the content disposition is "inline",
so it is not like my example. In my example, nothing at
Mon, 7 May 2018 09:17:46 +0100, _Richmond_:
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Wed, 2 May 2018 14:06:47 +0100, _Richmond_:
I have SM set to view the message body as plain text. But it does
not show attachments. At least it did not show some in a forwarded
message from an apple mail client. Is this
The same thing occurs in Thunderbird. I suppose you could argue that if
you want to display the body as plain text, then it should have no
interpretation of embedded headers at all, as that would be more secure.
But it doesn't do that either, unless you use ctrl-U.
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
>
> With all said here, and elsewhere in this thread – next time try
> unchecking:
>
> View -> Display Attachments Inline
>
> and see if it makes a difference for you.
>
It didn't make any difference.
I think the "inline" thing is a red herring. Probably what I
OK I have recreated the problem as follows:
On my iPhone, I created a spreadsheet using the Numbers app. (I don't
think it matters what the attachment is, this is just an example). I
then sent this to myself by email. (It is not obvious [to me] how to do
this, I searched for it, then selected it
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
> Wed, 2 May 2018 14:06:47 +0100, _Richmond_:
>
>> I have SM set to view the message body as plain text. But it does not
>> show attachments. At least it did not show some in a forwarded message
>> from an apple mail client. Is this what we want? It could at least say
>>
Ray_Net wrote:
> Richmond wrote on 05-05-18 01:11:
>> EE wrote:
>>> Richmond wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
> Richmond wrote:
>> Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
>>> Richmond wrote:
>>>
I have SM set to view the message body as plain text. But it
does not
Sun, 6 May 2018 15:05:32 +0300, _Stanimir Stamenkov_:
Sun, 6 May 2018 09:23:45 +0300, _Stanimir Stamenkov_:
Wed, 2 May 2018 14:06:47 +0100, _Richmond_:
I have SM set to view the message body as plain text. But it does not
show attachments. At least it did not show some in a forwarded
message
Sun, 6 May 2018 20:27:54 -0400, _Paul B. Gallagher_:
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
So the first time I've composed an HTML message and inserted an image
it retained the file name information so it appears as attachment when
viewed as plain text. Next I've used Edit As New... and the file name
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 6 May 2018 14:31:34 -0400, _Paul B. Gallagher_:
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
It depends on how the client handles it, and Ray is not correct for
SeaMonkey at least. If you View -> Message Body As -> Plain Text on
an HTML message with an embedded image – the image
Sun, 6 May 2018 14:31:34 -0400, _Paul B. Gallagher_:
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
It depends on how the client handles it, and Ray is not correct for
SeaMonkey at least. If you View -> Message Body As -> Plain Text on
an HTML message with an embedded image – the image will then appear
as an
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 6 May 2018 00:27:56 +0200, _EE_:
Ray_Net wrote:
It's normal that the attachment is available when you send a
plain-text mail with an attachment...
but try to compose and send an HTML mail with a copy/paste on the
content of a picture instead of adding an
Sun, 6 May 2018 00:27:56 +0200, _EE_:
Ray_Net wrote:
It's normal that the attachment is available when you send a
plain-text mail with an attachment...
but try to compose and send an HTML mail with a copy/paste on the
content of a picture instead of adding an attachment - then the guy
who
Ray_Net wrote:
EE wrote on 05-05-18 19:53:
Richmond wrote:
EE wrote:
Richmond wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Richmond wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Richmond wrote:
I have SM set to view the message body as plain text. But it
does not
show attachments. At least it did not show some
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Wed, 2 May 2018 14:06:47 +0100, _Richmond_:
I have SM set to view the message body as plain text. But it does not show
attachments. At least it did not show some in a forwarded message from an
apple mail client. Is this what we want? It could at least say that there
Wed, 2 May 2018 14:06:47 +0100, _Richmond_:
I have SM set to view the message body as plain text. But it does not
show attachments. At least it did not show some in a forwarded message
from an apple mail client. Is this what we want? It could at least say
that there are attachments without
Ray_Net wrote:
It's normal that the attachment is available when you send a plain-text
mail with an attachment...
but try to compose and send an HTML mail with a copy/paste on the
content of a picture instead of adding an attachment - then the guy who
receive your mail - if he force the
EE wrote on 05-05-18 19:53:
Richmond wrote:
EE wrote:
Richmond wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Richmond wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Richmond wrote:
I have SM set to view the message body as plain text. But it
does not
show attachments. At least it did not show some in a forwarded
Richmond wrote:
EE wrote:
Richmond wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Richmond wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Richmond wrote:
I have SM set to view the message body as plain text. But it does not
show attachments. At least it did not show some in a forwarded
message
from an apple mail
Richmond wrote on 05-05-18 01:11:
EE wrote:
Richmond wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Richmond wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Richmond wrote:
I have SM set to view the message body as plain text. But it does not
show attachments. At least it did not show some in a forwarded
message
from
EE wrote:
> Richmond wrote:
>> Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
>>> Richmond wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
> Richmond wrote:
>
>> I have SM set to view the message body as plain text. But it does not
>> show attachments. At least it did not show some in a forwarded
>> message
EE wrote:
From what I understood from using Thunderbird, attachments are removed
from messages before forwarding them.
Not so in SeaMonkey. Here, they remain as attachments, whether you send
in plain text or HTML.
I can't vouch for TB.
--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's
Richmond wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Richmond wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Richmond wrote:
I have SM set to view the message body as plain text. But it does not
show attachments. At least it did not show some in a forwarded message
from an apple mail client. Is this what we want? It
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
> Richmond wrote:
>> Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
>>> Richmond wrote:
>>>
I have SM set to view the message body as plain text. But it does not
show attachments. At least it did not show some in a forwarded message
from an apple mail client. Is this what we
Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 02-05-18 17:56:
Richmond wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Richmond wrote:
I have SM set to view the message body as plain text. But it does not
show attachments. At least it did not show some in a forwarded message
from an apple mail client. Is this what we want? It
Earlier today, I wrote:
Not sure what you mean "show attachments," but there are a couple of
ways for you to detect that a message contains an attachment.
1) In the message list, you'll see column headings like "Subject,"
"From," "Date," "Status," etc. On the far right, if you've enabled it,
Richmond wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Richmond wrote:
I have SM set to view the message body as plain text. But it does not
show attachments. At least it did not show some in a forwarded message
from an apple mail client. Is this what we want? It could at least say
that there are
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
> Richmond wrote:
>
>> I have SM set to view the message body as plain text. But it does not
>> show attachments. At least it did not show some in a forwarded message
>> from an apple mail client. Is this what we want? It could at least say
>> that there are attachments
Richmond wrote:
I have SM set to view the message body as plain text. But it does not
show attachments. At least it did not show some in a forwarded message
from an apple mail client. Is this what we want? It could at least say
that there are attachments without trying any further
56 matches
Mail list logo
