Bob Fleischer wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Bob Fleischer wrote:
Gerry Hickman wrote:
Ah! It's got the "follow-up" flag set! That explains a lot:)
It certainly would be a usability improvement if SeaMonkey did
something (probably as an option) to grab one's attention in this
case.
With any co
Bob Fleischer wrote:
Perhaps we need a "usability" forum to work out such ideas?
The group here is good for this discussion.
I really have not taken the time (nor do I really have the time if it is
substantial) to become familiar with the bug reporting mechanism. How
strict is the definition
Bob Fleischer wrote:
File a bug on that? Any ideas what to do and how to provide maximum
usability and minimum intrusion for users would be nice!
I really have not taken the time (nor do I really have the time if it is
substantial) to become familiar with the bug reporting mechanism. How
stri
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Bob Fleischer wrote:
Gerry Hickman wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Did you look into mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey - where the posts actually
did go to?
Ah! It's got the "follow-up" flag set! That explains a lot:)
It certainly would be a usability improvement if SeaMonkey di
Bob Fleischer wrote:
Gerry Hickman wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Did you look into mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey - where the posts actually
did go to?
Ah! It's got the "follow-up" flag set! That explains a lot:)
It certainly would be a usability improvement if SeaMonkey did something
(probably
Gerry Hickman wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Did you look into mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey - where the posts actually
did go to?
Ah! It's got the "follow-up" flag set! That explains a lot:)
It certainly would be a usability improvement if SeaMonkey did something
(probably as an option) to grab
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Did you look into mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey - where the posts actually
did go to?
Ah! It's got the "follow-up" flag set! That explains a lot:)
--
Gerry Hickman (London UK)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@li
Gerry Hickman wrote:
Hi,
I'm reading this NG from the newsreader in SM2.0 Beta2. In general,
everything looks normal, but I noticed my reply to Robert Kaiser's
message "SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 2" of 19 Oct 2009 did not
appear in the newsreader. This message appears after "Windows 7?" and
Gerry Hickman schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I'm reading this NG from the newsreader in SM2.0 Beta2. In general,
> everything looks normal, but I noticed my reply to Robert Kaiser's
> message "SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 2" of 19 Oct 2009 did not
> appear in the newsreader. This message appears after "Win
Hi,
I'm reading this NG from the newsreader in SM2.0 Beta2. In general,
everything looks normal, but I noticed my reply to Robert Kaiser's
message "SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 2" of 19 Oct 2009 did not
appear in the newsreader. This message appears after "Windows 7?" and
before "Switch to
10 matches
Mail list logo