Re: SM 2.0 Posts Missing in mozilla.support.seamonkey (but they're on Google)

2009-10-21 Thread Jens Hatlak
Bob Fleischer wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Bob Fleischer wrote: Gerry Hickman wrote: Ah! It's got the "follow-up" flag set! That explains a lot:) It certainly would be a usability improvement if SeaMonkey did something (probably as an option) to grab one's attention in this case. With any co

Re: SM 2.0 Posts Missing in mozilla.support.seamonkey (but they're on Google)

2009-10-21 Thread Robert Kaiser
Bob Fleischer wrote: Perhaps we need a "usability" forum to work out such ideas? The group here is good for this discussion. I really have not taken the time (nor do I really have the time if it is substantial) to become familiar with the bug reporting mechanism. How strict is the definition

Re: SM 2.0 Posts Missing in mozilla.support.seamonkey (but they're on Google)

2009-10-21 Thread Gerry Hickman
Bob Fleischer wrote: File a bug on that? Any ideas what to do and how to provide maximum usability and minimum intrusion for users would be nice! I really have not taken the time (nor do I really have the time if it is substantial) to become familiar with the bug reporting mechanism. How stri

Re: SM 2.0 Posts Missing in mozilla.support.seamonkey (but they're on Google)

2009-10-21 Thread Bob Fleischer
Robert Kaiser wrote: Bob Fleischer wrote: Gerry Hickman wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Did you look into mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey - where the posts actually did go to? Ah! It's got the "follow-up" flag set! That explains a lot:) It certainly would be a usability improvement if SeaMonkey di

Re: SM 2.0 Posts Missing in mozilla.support.seamonkey (but they're on Google)

2009-10-21 Thread Robert Kaiser
Bob Fleischer wrote: Gerry Hickman wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Did you look into mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey - where the posts actually did go to? Ah! It's got the "follow-up" flag set! That explains a lot:) It certainly would be a usability improvement if SeaMonkey did something (probably

Re: SM 2.0 Posts Missing in mozilla.support.seamonkey (but they're on Google)

2009-10-21 Thread Bob Fleischer
Gerry Hickman wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Did you look into mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey - where the posts actually did go to? Ah! It's got the "follow-up" flag set! That explains a lot:) It certainly would be a usability improvement if SeaMonkey did something (probably as an option) to grab

Re: SM 2.0 Posts Missing in mozilla.support.seamonkey (but they're on Google)

2009-10-21 Thread Gerry Hickman
Robert Kaiser wrote: Did you look into mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey - where the posts actually did go to? Ah! It's got the "follow-up" flag set! That explains a lot:) -- Gerry Hickman (London UK) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@li

Re: SM 2.0 Posts Missing in mozilla.support.seamonkey (but they're on Google)

2009-10-21 Thread Robert Kaiser
Gerry Hickman wrote: Hi, I'm reading this NG from the newsreader in SM2.0 Beta2. In general, everything looks normal, but I noticed my reply to Robert Kaiser's message "SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 2" of 19 Oct 2009 did not appear in the newsreader. This message appears after "Windows 7?" and

Re: SM 2.0 Posts Missing in mozilla.support.seamonkey (but they're on Google)

2009-10-20 Thread Martin Freitag
Gerry Hickman schrieb: > Hi, > > I'm reading this NG from the newsreader in SM2.0 Beta2. In general, > everything looks normal, but I noticed my reply to Robert Kaiser's > message "SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 2" of 19 Oct 2009 did not > appear in the newsreader. This message appears after "Win

SM 2.0 Posts Missing in mozilla.support.seamonkey (but they're on Google)

2009-10-20 Thread Gerry Hickman
Hi, I'm reading this NG from the newsreader in SM2.0 Beta2. In general, everything looks normal, but I noticed my reply to Robert Kaiser's message "SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 2" of 19 Oct 2009 did not appear in the newsreader. This message appears after "Windows 7?" and before "Switch to