Re: SM 2.0A Beta Install Question...

2009-07-30 Thread Gerd Klaus Hafenbrack
NoOp wrote: On 07/30/2009 02:29 AM, Martin Feitag wrote: Gerd Klaus Hafenbrack schrieb: Martin Feitag wrote: Gerd Klaus Hafenbrack schrieb: SamuelS wrote: Gerd Klaus Hafenbrack wrote: Samuel S wrote: Hello all, after installing SM 2.0A Beta, ... What is "SM 2.0*A* Beta"? I only know "SeaM

Re: SM 2.0A Beta Install Question...

2009-07-30 Thread NoOp
On 07/30/2009 02:29 AM, Martin Feitag wrote: > Gerd Klaus Hafenbrack schrieb: >> Martin Feitag wrote: >>> Gerd Klaus Hafenbrack schrieb: SamuelS wrote: > Gerd Klaus Hafenbrack wrote: >> Samuel S wrote: >>> Hello all, after installing SM 2.0A Beta, ... >> What is "SM 2.0*A* Beta

Re: SM 2.0A Beta Install Question...

2009-07-30 Thread Martin Feitag
Gerd Klaus Hafenbrack schrieb: > Martin Feitag wrote: >> Gerd Klaus Hafenbrack schrieb: >>> SamuelS wrote: Gerd Klaus Hafenbrack wrote: > Samuel S wrote: >> Hello all, after installing SM 2.0A Beta, ... > What is "SM 2.0*A* Beta"? > I only know "SeaMonkey 2.0 Beta 1". Gerd

Re: SM 2.0A Beta Install Question...

2009-07-30 Thread Gerd Klaus Hafenbrack
Martin Feitag wrote: Gerd Klaus Hafenbrack schrieb: SamuelS wrote: Gerd Klaus Hafenbrack wrote: Samuel S wrote: Hello all, after installing SM 2.0A Beta, ... What is "SM 2.0*A* Beta"? I only know "SeaMonkey 2.0 Beta 1". Gerd - it is up to 3 now... With or without the "A"? I can find neithe

Re: SM 2.0A Beta Install Question...

2009-07-30 Thread Martin Feitag
Gerd Klaus Hafenbrack schrieb: > SamuelS wrote: >> Gerd Klaus Hafenbrack wrote: >>> Samuel S wrote: Hello all, after installing SM 2.0A Beta, ... >>> >>> What is "SM 2.0*A* Beta"? >>> I only know "SeaMonkey 2.0 Beta 1". >> >> Gerd - it is up to 3 now... > > With or without the "A"? > I can fi

Re: SM 2.0A Beta Install Question...

2009-07-30 Thread Gerd Klaus Hafenbrack
SamuelS wrote: Gerd Klaus Hafenbrack wrote: Samuel S wrote: Hello all, after installing SM 2.0A Beta, ... What is "SM 2.0*A* Beta"? I only know "SeaMonkey 2.0 Beta 1". Gerd - it is up to 3 now... With or without the "A"? I can find neither a SeaMonkey 2.0 Beta 3 nor a SeaMonkey 2.0*A* Bet

Re: SM 2.0A Beta Install Question...

2009-07-29 Thread SamuelS
Gerd Klaus Hafenbrack wrote: Samuel S wrote: Hello all, after installing SM 2.0A Beta, ... What is "SM 2.0*A* Beta"? I only know "SeaMonkey 2.0 Beta 1". Gerd - it is up to 3 now... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.

Re: SM 2.0A Beta Install Question...

2009-07-29 Thread David Wilkinson
MN wrote: I believe it means that it will over write any other installation of Seamonkey 2. I installed 2.0b1 and it didn't harm my 1.1.17 install at all. If we are talking about the installation files (rather than the default profile location) then on my computers the install directories ar

Re: SM 2.0A Beta Install Question...

2009-07-28 Thread NoOp
On 07/28/2009 03:19 PM, MN wrote: > NoOp wrote: ... >> But it looks like I'd be wrong (sorry I'm more familiar with linux >> except for testing w/Windows), as it appears that 2.0ax overwrote your >> 1.1.14 according to: >> http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/2.0/install-and-uninstall >> >> Note:

Re: SM 2.0A Beta Install Question...

2009-07-27 Thread Gerd Klaus Hafenbrack
Samuel S wrote: Hello all, after installing SM 2.0A Beta, ... What is "SM 2.0*A* Beta"? I only know "SeaMonkey 2.0 Beta 1". ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.0A Beta Install Question...

2009-07-27 Thread NoOp
On 07/27/2009 06:33 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote: > Samuel S wrote: >> When installing 2.0A1 beta I was asked which profile to transfer, I >> tried to get them both and could not, so I chose my main profile to >> install and not the others. >> >> Thus, my question is still, how can I install the others

Re: SM 2.0A Beta Install Question...

2009-07-27 Thread Robert Kaiser
Samuel S wrote: When installing 2.0A1 beta I was asked which profile to transfer, I tried to get them both and could not, so I chose my main profile to install and not the others. Thus, my question is still, how can I install the others without having to re-invent the profiles etc.. it is possib

Re: SM 2.0A Beta Install Question...

2009-07-27 Thread NoOp
On 07/27/2009 03:58 PM, Samuel S wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> On 07/27/2009 03:03 PM, Samuel S wrote: >>> Hello all, after installing SM 2.0A Beta, it did not load my other >>> profiles. How do I get them loaded in this version, if at all?? >> >> It's important that you tell us what OS you are running,

Re: SM 2.0A Beta Install Question...

2009-07-27 Thread Samuel S
NoOp wrote: On 07/27/2009 03:03 PM, Samuel S wrote: Hello all, after installing SM 2.0A Beta, it did not load my other profiles. How do I get them loaded in this version, if at all?? It's important that you tell us what OS you are running, and what version of SM you also have installed (1.1.x)

Re: SM 2.0A Beta Install Question...

2009-07-27 Thread NoOp
On 07/27/2009 03:43 PM, NoOp wrote: > C:\Documents and Settings\gg\Application > Data\Mozilla\Profiles\default\.slt Sorry, should be: C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data\Mozilla\Profiles\default\.slt ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-se

Re: SM 2.0A Beta Install Question...

2009-07-27 Thread NoOp
On 07/27/2009 03:03 PM, Samuel S wrote: > Hello all, after installing SM 2.0A Beta, it did not load my other > profiles. How do I get them loaded in this version, if at all?? It's important that you tell us what OS you are running, and what version of SM you also have installed (1.1.x). This mig

SM 2.0A Beta Install Question...

2009-07-27 Thread Samuel S
Hello all, after installing SM 2.0A Beta, it did not load my other profiles. How do I get them loaded in this version, if at all?? Yes, I did not back up the profile before installing the newer version which came to me after the final click... dumb, very dumb... TIA... Bo1953 ___