Message
Subject:3DAA | Audio Alliance
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:47:31 +0100
From: Uli Loehneysen loehney...@aol.com
To: Stefan Schreiber st...@mail.telepac.pt
http://www.3daa.org/index.html
Keine Angaben über Mitglieder . . .
Grüße,
Uli
-- next part
Dear Helmut,
many thanks for this contribution, too!
However: How many dry recorded audio tracks are there? There might be
dozens... Therefore, you can't control things like space or data rate
for streaming. This is an important point or objection, I would say in
my first reaction!
Data of
Helmut Oellers wrote:
Data of source position and recording room acoustics would have to be
coded in a transparent and elegant form, and is there any agreement on this?
This looks far from being trivial...
Unfortunately, all trivial tasks are solved today. :) However, this seem
f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 05:53:01PM +, Geoffrey Barton wrote:
How do you justify that assertion?
How do you justify your assertion that phase errors of 1 degree are
OK but 4 degrees are not ?
Phase shifts changing with frequency also translate
f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 04:38:19PM +, Augustine Leudar wrote:
Im sure Im missing something obvious here but humour me. With a stereo
signal I can just place two speakers in a line and have my stereo signal
send two discrete channels to each speakers, each
f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 04:38:19PM +, Augustine Leudar wrote:
Im sure Im missing something obvious here but humour me. With a stereo
signal I can just place two speakers in a line and have my stereo signal
send two discrete channels to each speakers, each
Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 01/23/2011 01:41 AM, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
In fact, the introduced system might deliver better results than say
Dolby Pro Logic IIz.
that's like saying this new car model is a lot faster than a dead
whale on the beach :-D
This is a cool analogy
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:27 PM, e deleflie edelef...@gmail.com wrote:
The ambisonia wiki can, and *should* be hosted somewhere else. This
should be relatively easy to transfer to whoever would like to take
it. Would have to be under a different domain name.
The
?
g
Stefan Schreiber
P.S.: Small hint
It would be better if the Linux software might work for other Linux
distributions, too...
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
the reasonable B fomat adepts and snobistic HOA rocket
scientists...
Running away... :-D
Best,
Stefan Schreiber
P.S.: Speaking of B format recordings, there are the well-known issues
of sound quality. SNR? High frequencies?
A typical B format mic is good for ambience recordings
,
Stefan Schreiber
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20110501/fc3a71c3/attachment.html
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https
Marc Lavallée wrote:
An appropriate discussion could be about how to scale the quality of the
experience from stereo to first-order ambisonics with four speakers up
to eight and more, in the same room. Installing a good surround system
is not very different from installing a good-enough stereo
John Leonard wrote:
Some years ago I asked a question about how many list-members actually had
correctly set up surround systems of any sort at home; not in the studio, or
research facility, but in their own homes as a way of enjoying music. I seem to
remember that very few - three, if I
Martin Leese wrote:
Stefan Schreiber st...@mail.telepac.pt wrote:
...
I have argued to introduce some common file format for 3D audio, for
example Ambisonics up to third order.
This standard could be based on the already existing FMH-Format.
Now, I am supposedly one of the snobs... But FMH
Marc Lavallée wrote:
Mon, 02 May 2011 06:59:40 +0200,
Jörn Nettingsmeier netti...@stackingdwarves.net wrote :
not native, but here's a very simple one that has been shoehorned
into a third-order workstation:
http://cec.concordia.ca/econtact/11_3/nettingsmeier_ambisonics.html
I'd
for clarifications
Stefan Schreiber
From: dw surso...@dwareing.plus.com
To: Surround Sound discussion group sursound@music.vt.edu
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2011 11:13 AM
Subject: [Sursound] New filter
Free Ambiophonic stereo-dipole type crosstalk cancelling filter.
For 3 sample delay @ 44100. Speaker angle
Robert Greene wrote:
The point I am trying to make is that there are ALWAYS higher frequency
components, except for the eternal om that started before time began
and that will continue into all eternity.(No offense I hope to believers
in the religious content here). Only that type of
Stefan Schreiber wrote:
Robert Greene wrote:
The point I am trying to make is that there are ALWAYS higher frequency
components, except for the eternal om that started before time
began and that will continue into all eternity.(No offense I hope to
believers
in the religious content
Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 07/09/2011 11:13 PM, dw wrote:
Care to send a clip of an impossible-to-sound-as-good-as-with-stereo
recording for me to play with.
well, this kind of stand-off isn't likely to lead anywhere. sounds
good is very hard to define or even test.
i'm not terribly
Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 07/09/2011 10:19 PM, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 02:04:21PM -0400, Marc Lavallée wrote:
The perceived directional bandwidth of stereo recordings is better
than what conventional stereo (with cross-talk) can
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 09:41:04PM -0400, Marc Lavallée wrote:
If you could help me understand spherical harmonics, I'd be a MAG
fanboy in no time. The best didactic resource I found is a very
strange article titled Notes on Basic Ideas of Spherical Harmonics.
It's
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 05:44:50PM +0100, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
As a violinist, my choice would be the sawtooth wave, just for
demonstrational purposes.
Which has the same problems (infinite bandwidth etc.)
But yes, as a violinist it would probably hurt
Marc Lavallée wrote:
Stefan Schreiber st...@mail.telepac.pt a écrit :
Now come on, a square wave is not about music!
Iannis Xenakis would not agree with you...
--
Marc
___
But HIS square waves are irregular, or a chain
and Ambio.
Very reasonable.
Best regards,
Stefan Schreiber
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
Hello Marc...
I don't get access to the (dropbox) file.
Error (404)
We can't find the page you're looking for.
Is this because I am not based in the USA?
Best,
Stefan
Marc Lavallée wrote:
dw surso...@dwareing.plus.com a écrit :
On 10/07/2011 18:10, Stefan Schreiber wrote
Well, unless the amplifier encounters some of the elusive square
(freak) waves... :-D
Stefan
Robert Greene wrote:
No speaker requires a fast amplifier,
whatever that means. ALL amplifiers that
are not defective are far faster in any reasonable
sense than any speaker is. Some amps
have
Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 07/11/2011 12:39 AM, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
With all these efforts, why is actually nobody just marketing a
headphone solution with head-tracking?
smyth research makes one (called the realizer), or there's the
beyerdynamic headzone.
We have discussed
Bearcat M. Şandor wrote:
On 07/10/2011 11:10 AM, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
To clarify a few basic things:
The first poster in this thread (and obviously some other people who
maybe should have known better) are claiming that you could receive a
360º representation via just two (supposedly
Bearcat M. Sandor wrote:
On 7/11/2011 8:30 AM, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
However, the 12+ channel audio system (for Ambisonics?) is a
caricature, at best. 8 horizontal speakers would be enough for
Ambisonics 3rd order, for home purposes. 1st order can be reproduced
with 4 speakers, you
Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 07/18/2011 06:18 PM, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
Which means that they are probably using HRTF techniques. Because HRTF
is an individual parameter, they would have to use some form of
standard HRTF, as long as they don't perform individual measurements.
For me
Dave Malham wrote:
Hi Jörn,
Saved me some typing - pretty well what I would have said :-)
Dave
Absolutely same opinion, right? :-D
Surround is not just about Ambisonics and maybe WFS, yet again.
True - but they are ones that work and are well established.
Dave
, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
Dave Malham wrote:
Surround is not just about Ambisonics and maybe WFS, yet again.
True - but they are ones that work and are well established.
Dave
Ambisonics and WFS are well-established?! Depends on your view on
this...
In the sense
Dave Hunt wrote:
It is true that 1st order ambisonics doesn't consider distance, with
all sources being reproduced at the distance of the speakers,
although Gerzon did consider distance panning. A Soundfield mic
recording contains distance information. If attempting spatial
synthesis,
that you can narrow patent claims
during a patent examination, but you can never widen patent claims. In
an European patent, there is just one main claim - claim 1, whereas an
American patent might allow several concurrent/similar main claims.)
Just for some clarification...
Best,
Stefan
is if this is/was a topic to discuss on
the sursound list, but maybe I should run for cover...:-D
Best,
Stefan Schreiber
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20110919/60c84aeb/attachment.html
Dave Malham wrote:
On 19/09/2011 00:44, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
Fair enough. The fact that the different patent systems are not
perfect doesn't justify to insult anyone involved.
Well, like I said, I do apologise - it was an unfortunate attempt at a
humorous dig at the system
Richard Dobson wrote:
On 19/09/2011 15:21, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
..
The 20 minutes per application might refer to a specific step,
Probably the pre-filtering to eliminate the umpteen patents for free
energy machines, teleportation devices, anti-gravity drives,
kitchen-table fusion
Sampo Syreeni wrote:
On 2011-09-19, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
Our economy is really based on IP, in some areas. Think of the
pharmaceutical industry in Britain.
Personally I'm a political pirate, and an economically minded
classical liberal/libertarian minarchist, at the same time. I'd
Oops, I try to send the same message in another format... :-[
Michael Chapman wrote:
Sampo Syreeni wrote:
On 2011-09-19, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
What she does *not* know is that the oldest, simplest and cheapest
NSAID medication works even better. I mean, today, now
as
opponents;-( had said.
I actually thought I did... :-[ :-)
That seems to be a lost hope.
But if we would have some clear thread topic (which already has OT
included), maybe there would have been far less room for any
misunderstandings?
Best,
Stefan Schreiber
on it, Ambisonics is dead in the water,
because frankly I'm rather uninterested in having to set up my listening
environment for 20 minutes before I can play some obscure avant-garde musical
experiment in surround sound.
But would you spend the 20 minutes if Apple tells you to do so?
Best,
Stefan
newme...@aol.com wrote:
Ronald:
Whiz-bang demos won't make any difference, but
adoption by Apple's iTunes Store, or something like
that would make a difference.
Very interesting! Does iTunes currently support multi-channel audio
(other than on purchased movies)?
As best I can
Ronald C.F. Antony wrote:
The Ambisonic community keeps shooting itself in the foot, because they can't
accept that OK is better than nothing, and that once OK is the accepted
standard, one can then incrementally push for higher-order extensions to an
already existing infrastructure.
Ronald C.F. Antony wrote:
The problem is: who still needs hardware? Unless it's incorporated into
something like an Oppo DVD/BD player, which hooks up directly to a power amp,
the hardware of choice is something like an AppleTV that gets its data stream
from a computer server, i.e. iTunes.
people think Apple is needlessly proprietary.
Oh yeah, they have to offer a closed and walled garden. Otherwise
things would not work as PERFECT as Apple users expect...
Best,
Stefan Schreiber
P.S.: And they care since years for the best and safest working
conditions at the Foxconn plants
there is still a real chance that it will happen. The iTunes
shop is currently irrelevant for surround music, and there are more
companies around than Apple.
Best,
Stefan Schreiber
On 12 Apr 2012, at 22:05, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:47:04PM +0200, Ronald C.F. Antony wrote
Paul Hodges wrote:
--On 13 April 2012 03:08 +0100 Stefan Schreiber
st...@mail.telepac.pt wrote:
I am not sure that any form of surround will make it into the home,
I have quite a lot of commercial surround music recordings, on 5.1
media. However, because of my recording activities, my
Ronald C.F. Antony wrote:
UHJ is simple and convenient, because people can buy it as a regular stereo
track like the rest of the music. No pop-up with a choice: stereo or surround
version, no playlists where one has to make sure the stereo version ends up on
the iPod, and the surround
,
Stefan Schreiber
P.S.: Surround reproduction is not related in any form to cheap hard
drives () vs. SSD storage. I am actually tired of reading this
stuff about cheap, crappy speakers, cheap hard drives etc. Nice
rhetorical attempt, but what is the aim
.)
I mean, you have to decode AVC and HEVC (successor standard for video
compression, nearly finished), and you have to decode a movie which is
presented in some container format. (sound, menus, synchronization...)
Mobile smart devices are not PCs, but obviously computers.
Best,
Stefan
Ronald C.F. Antony wrote:
On 14 Apr 2012, at 16:47, Stefan Schreiber st...@mail.telepac.pt wrote:
Ronald C.F. Antony wrote:
UHJ is simple and convenient, because people can buy it as a regular stereo
track like the rest of the music. No pop-up with a choice: stereo or surround
of an issue than all
the artefacts that arise from lossy compression, and people by and large don't
care or notice either.
Artefacts are probably bigger than from lossy compression (which one?
AAC?).
People don't care: I do, and don't underestimate your customers anyway.
Best,
Stefan
luxury products, because even the richtest
customers can't listen to enough recordings.
Secondly, good speakers don't have to be so expensive as they tell you
in the local hi fi shop. And thirdly, you will buy less times speakers
in your life than iPhones/Android phones...
Best,
Stefan Schreiber
The solution to establish any mass market for surround would be
obviously to look into better playback via headphones.
(binaural, 5.1, FOA, .AMB, etc.)
Listening via (4-x) speakers at home would be higher en.
Motion-compensated playback is possible nowadays. Many devices have
motion sensors.
had in the 80s. :-D )
Dolby's beds seem to be 5.1/7.1 mixes, or submixes. The system seems
to be hybrid, and definitively backward-compatible to 5.1 and 7.1.
(Makes a lot of sense, from a Dolby perspective.)
Best,
Stefan Schreiber
On 24/04/2012 09:39, Dave Malham wrote:
I'd heard
Ronald C.F. Antony wrote:
On 24 Apr 2012, at 19:08, Stefan Schreiber st...@mail.telepac.pt wrote:
(Or: surround is maybe not dead if you cram 3 matrixed channels into 2
channels of Apple- compressed AAC iTunes files - which is actually a worse solution
than we already had in the 80s
music industry didn't and doesn't care,
but in the end probably there has to happen something. Because the
question might be asked why people who actually have a lot of surround
recordings/mixes in the vault don't want to sell them, which seems kind
of idealistic.g
Stefan Schreiber
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 06:43:41PM +0100, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
You also seem to think that 16 bits are enough FAPP, but orchestra
recordings have often more than 96dB dynamic range. I know that you can
hear under the noise floor. But then, you probably
Robert Greene wrote:
Re dynamic range of orchestras.
For recording one needs more than CD standard 16 bits because
one never knows when some instantanteous peak may stick
way out and clip nastily if one does not have a lot of headroom.
Thank goodness for 24 bits!
But seriously, no orchestral
Simon Edmonds wrote:
We call our own system DOME (Digital Object-oriented Mix Engine)
because, early on in the process, we realised that to produce a
format-agnostic production tool we had to seriously re-evaluate the
traditional mixing paradigm and came up with what we call audio
(- 2nd order) into the
(over blown, full) Mpeg-4 multimedia standard, therefore they have to
know this.
- I will send a copy to the indicated e-mail address
Best,
Stefan Schreiber
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https
Paul Hodges wrote:
--On 08 July 2012 18:25 +0100 Stefan Schreiber st...@mail.telepac.pt
wrote:
Gerald Wilson wrote:
I assume no-one is manufacturing such devices anymore?
Who would buy this? Museums?:-)
At a sensible price I would consider it seriously. Computers are all
very
Wrong topic?
I have a question concerning the conversion of a stereo recording to
ambisonics. In the Wireless World of 1977 articles there are equations for
the
conversion of stereo to W,X,Y equivalent signals. The use of j*Diff term
doesn't seem to make sense.
This is the other direction...
Sampo Syreeni wrote:
On 2012-10-08, Charlie Richmond wrote:
We will add you to the group if you want - there are 120 people on
there now But you aren't 'friends' of mine so I can't ask you to
join
Charlie, again a word of caution: nowadays you can't really know who
will be added
Martin Leese wrote:
Carsten Bohn wrote:
It has sort of got lost in the melee.
...
This list has an amazing side-effect, which is
: getting to know new words things that I
haven't heard as off now,
f.e. M?l?e : which Google translates in german
to something like fray in naval
, Charlie Richmond charlie@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Stefan Schreiber st...@mail.telepac.pt
wrote:
Sampo Syreeni wrote:
How about a simple group called ambisonic or Ambisonics, in FB?
There already is an ambisonics group in fb
Bo-Erik Sandholm wrote:
As this was in a session on next gen MPEG format, and header specification in
MPEG among other things...
If I remembers correctly there was a possibility to specify that the audio format was
- WFS
- 5.1
- 7.1
- 22.1
No possibility to carry pure ambisonics using our
Ronald C.F. Antony wrote:
On 28 Oct 2012, at 22:34, Stefan Schreiber st...@mail.telepac.pt wrote:
When Ambi VLC happens, I predict the re-surrection of UHJ. Simple 2 channels
will remain the most important distribution format in the forseable future.
This is real surround sound
not to this audio list.)
Good night,
Stefan Schreiber
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
Ronald C.F. Antony wrote:
Object Oriented programming was available 1978/1980. It wasn't used until NeXT
started pushing ObjC and SUN tried to rip it off unsuccessfully with Java
(which barely qualifies because for several iterations of the language it
missed key elements of a real OOP
Ronald C.F. Antony wrote:
On 29 Oct 2012, at 20:56, Stefan Schreiber st...@mail.telepac.pt wrote:
Oh yes, go to Apple and look if they listen to your ideas, and let others do their stuff instead of doing
some promotion for some stylish, fahionable campany offering super slim
products
Peter Lennox wrote:
Am I missing something? - for mobile use, wouldn't B-format to binaural be
better than UHJ?
Dr Peter Lennox
Yes, but then you didn't need a solution requiring the participation of
mighty Apple... ;-)
Best,
Stefan
this into a wonderful simple
form... :-)
+1
Stefan Schreiber
P.S.: And if we are already here, many online movies include a stereo
and 5.1 version. (So not just DVDs or BDs, also online distribution.)
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https
headphones actually works
so well at all... (Many people have problems, such as in-head effects,
lack of perceived real space, etc.)
If you would fix these problems, then you could probably also reproduce
convincing binaural surround via headphones.
Best,
Stefan Schreiber
On 31/10/2012 16:38
before, at least I have some strange déjà vu
feeling here... :-)
Best,
Stefan Schreiber
To: Surround Sound discussion group
Subject: Re: [Sursound] Patent application: Data structure for HOA
On 1 Nov 2012, at 23:07, Stefan Schreiber st
Michael Chapman wrote:
The current situation at MPEG:
http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/studygroups/com16/video/Pages/jctvc.aspx
Next meetings:
* Geneva, Switzerland, October 2013 (tentative)
* Vienna, Austria, 27 July - 2 August 2013 (tentative)
* Incheon, Korea, 20-26 April 2013
Michael Chapman wrote:
OK, Stefan, I'll look at my diary ;-(
But
1) January 14-23 is ten days ... it is alo both tentative and 'next' week;
2 How does all this tye in with the MPEG-H 3D Audio Workshop (see copied
email below).
1) I am sorry, the date for the MPEG meetings seem to
FYI...
http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_viewnewsLang=ennewsId=20130107005822div=102718548
2013 International CES
LAS VEGAS--(BUSINESS WIRE http://www.businesswire.com/)--DTS, Inc.
creation and cinema delivery.
Of course this is marketing speech, but they present something.
Best,
Stefan Schreiber
Stefan Schreiber wrote:
FYI...
http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_viewnewsLang=ennewsId=20130107005822div=102718548
2013 International
their past and brand.
Best,
Stefan Schreiber
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
: Richard Furse rich...@muse440.com
To: 'Surround Sound discussion group' sursound@music.vt.edu, 'Stefan
Schreiber' st...@mail.telepac.pt
Very interesting post following discussion.
I've actually been added very recently to the IST/37 committee, which
apparently is a close relative to the MPEG one
kind of open source
license. Anyway - if folk are interested in more detail, please get in touch
off-list!
Best wishes,
--Richard
-Original Message-
From: sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu [mailto:sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu]
On Behalf Of Stefan Schreiber
Sent: 06 January 2013 02:00
at the decoding stage where you are
dealing with very irregular arrays, so don't rule them out.
But this was/is the other issued which needed (needs...) some serious
discussion.
Thanks for the feedback,
Stefan
On 20 January 2013 04:11, Stefan Schreiber st...@mail.telepac.pt wrote:
Reading back
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Stefan Schreiber st...@mail.telepac.pt wrote:
This is a typical FUD approach presentend by the competition.
If I have anything to say about, I'd say that any Ambisonis based approach
would be patent-light, iof not patent-free
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Stefan Schreiber st...@mail.telepac.pt wrote:
This is a typical FUD approach presentend by the competition.
If I have anything to say about, I'd say that any Ambisonis based approach
would be patent-light, iof not patent-free
Marc Lavallée wrote:
Stefan Schreiber st...@mail.telepac.pt a écrit :
If it doesn't cost to include AVC and AAC into web
browsers/plugins etc., maybe it is/was about Open Source principles?
(Any discussion leads to nothing, because I tend to see this in a
pragmatic way. For others
Dave Malham wrote:
Hi Stefan,
I doubt if B+ would meet the currently perceived needs of cinema
surround mixers/producers since it does not have the ability to go
discrete. B++ might be enough - that's first order + 5.1 (I just
made that up :-)). A better option would be at least third
Marc Lavallée wrote:
Stefan Schreiber st...@mail.telepac.pt a écrit :
The Android OS is open, although not entirely:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_%28operating_system%29#Licensing
Very closely controlled by Google, even if being based on Linux and
some (propietary) hack
Hi Gabriel,
I would like to give some short commentaries inside your text, open for
further discussion...
Gabriel Wolf wrote:
Dear Sursounders,
the initial post of A proposal for an Ambisonics based 3D audio codec
... by Stefan Schreiber put all the things together so clearly and
nicely
Marc Lavallée wrote:
Remember that MPEG is creating proprietary, industrial and commercial
standards using lots of patents. How Ambisonics can co-exist?
--
Marc
The MPEG is part of the International Standard Organisation (ISO), in
fact it was founded by both ISO and IEC.
.
Shock, awe, trembling... O:-)
Good night,
Stefan
Stefan Schreiber wrote:
Marc Lavallée wrote:
Remember that MPEG is creating proprietary, industrial and commercial
standards using lots of patents. How Ambisonics can co-exist?
--
Marc
The MPEG is part of the International Standard
will be issued at the 103rd meeting in January 2012,
Don't speculate too much around, just do read .
Best,
Stefan Schreiber
P.S.: I know why I copy and paste such things.
Dolby Atmos also covers arbitrary speaker layouts, BTW. We are talking
about the reality, which is already being implemented
Marc Lavallée wrote:
Stefan, I was not stating that MPEG and ISO are evil. As a hobbyist, my
question is: how Ambisonics might be included in a standard format made
by the industry for the industry, that everybody would then have to
use if there are no viable (and simple) alternative appart
Richard Dobson wrote:
On 23/01/2013 01:39, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
..
Why are you actually not reading what I was posting? One of the
requirements is arbitrary speaker layouts. Full stop. (There will be
some fixed layouts, I guess. But still.)
...
of multi-channel audio programs
... Your view on this, Gregory? ;-)
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Stefan Schreiber st...@mail.telepac.pt wrote:
This is a typical FUD approach presentend by the competition.
If I have anything to say about, I'd say that any Ambisonis based approach
would be patent
I am apologizing for the HTML -- plain text msg. formatting errors, I
never seem to learn this.
MPEG Surround was also defined as one of the MPEG-4 Audio Object
Types
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPEG-4_Part_3#MPEG-4_Audio_Object_Types
in 2007.[8]
Michael Chapman wrote:
Anyway if anyone knows of a
wireless cable system out there that is high quality and works over
distances of up to 400m (in places where there is no internet) please let
me know !
You can (or could) get little boxes that plugged ino power points (as in
220v
Ok, I give up
You can't cite/copy hypertext (HTML) here, even not if sending in
(plain) text mode.
Thought this should work, sorry...
I tried to clean up the mess, results below...
Best,
Stefan
Stefan Schreiber wrote:
Michael Chapman wrote:
Anyway if anyone knows
,
Stefan Schreiber
P.S.: Further updates on the Shanghai and Genève meetings heavily
needed, IMO.
Mr. Pallone et al., the CfP is issued by now, and it is time to present
something. Anyway, I have signed up to the Mpeg list, but couldn't see
their CfP yet.
(I hope I don't have to hack
Dave Malham wrote:
Hi
On 1 February 2013 22:35, Fons Adriaensen f...@linuxaudio.org wrote:
Most systems that try to deliver sound directly to the ears
(this includes binaural, crosstalk cancellation etc.) ignore
the fact that normally a listener is not clamped into a vise.
Even binaural
1 - 100 of 444 matches
Mail list logo
