D. Mindock wrote:
You know, I'm just flat amazed to find Mr Mindock, whom I regarded as
about as liberal as they come, in complete agreement with Rush Limbaugh
and the rest of the conservative radio gang on anything. And here it
is, in black and white.
FWIW, which isn't much, I don't think
Keith Addison wrote:
D. Mindock wrote:
You know, I'm just flat amazed to find Mr Mindock, whom I regarded as
about as liberal as they come, in complete agreement with Rush Limbaugh
and the rest of the conservative radio gang on anything. And here it
is, in black and white.
FWIW, which
D. Mindock wrote:
Here is a Philippine inventor who first started running cars on only
water almost 30 years ago. He has 100 engines he has converted that
will run on just tap or sea water. Needless to say all the car
companies have tried to steal his technology so he is going to share
it
Joe Street wrote:
Hey I just thought of something. If I used your heatpump and
connected the output heat exchanger to a sterling motor generator set
with an overall efficiency of lets say 50%, I could get 1.5 KW of
electrical power from the 3 KW heat energy coming out of the
heatpump.
Mike Weaver wrote:
Redler, you never like my ideas. You've made me cry. Now how do you
feel? *snif*
Ok I can't leave well enough alone. A good friend who follows peak oil
pretty closely sent me this. I think it's optimistic at best and pretty
delusional at worst.
I found it to
Michael Redler wrote:
Thanks Jason, Katie and Keith.
The reason for my post had mostly to do with soil degradation. I was
researching what crops gave the best yield for ethanol production and
began looking at sugar beets as a possibility. However, the research
suggests that root crops
Johnathan Corgan wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thsi is true that pool dealers mostly deal in muratic acid and not
sulphuric. in my youth as a pool boy i have never seen sulphuric acid
used in a pool. so it gets back to my problem of purchasing
concentrated sulphuric acid since i am
D. Mindock wrote:
Bob,
- Original Message -
From: "bob allen" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 10:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] The Age of Autism: Hot potato on the Hill
D. Mindock wrote:
Autism is
te my time with more flames.
--- David
Todd Swearingen
David Miller wrote:
D. Mindock wrote:
Bob,
- Original Message -
From: "bob allen" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 10:13 AM
Subject: Re: [B
Andrew Netherton wrote:
Don't you remember the episode where Uncle Jesse actually made up a
batch of moonshine to run in a car? He had to outrun Roscoe and use
up all the fuel so he wouldn't get caught and go to jail! Of course,
it wasn't the General Lee that they were burning it in.
Bob Carr wrote:
It leaves a horrid toffee like deposit on your valves , pistons, rings and
every other part that comes into contact with the fuel.
When your piston rings are glued into their grooves, the sugar deposits will
find their way into your engine oil where they act as an abrasive on
Mike McGinness wrote:
I ran into something new (to me) recently on the topic of global
warming, CO2 and the greenhouse gas issue that I decided to follow up on
today to see if there was anything to it.
I have spent an entire day reading and searching the internet on the
topic and here are
Hakan Falk wrote:
That means that bottled water is more expensive than gasoline, as I
understand,
http://www.bairdpetro.com/gasoline_prices/index.htmhttp://www.bairdpetro.com/gasoline_prices/index.htm
@ $1.453 per gallon.
So, what was wrong with the original statement?
Nothing as I
Chip Mefford wrote:
In other news, I'll soon also have the 3rdworld CD online.
Will post the url when I get it up.
If anyone knows how to bust an iso image up into 'chunks'
that can be reassembled into a workable iso image, please
let me know.
I'm glad to say that renegade.sparks.net
John Hayes wrote:
David Miller wrote:
Chip Mefford wrote:
If anyone knows how to bust an iso image up into 'chunks'
that can be reassembled into a workable iso image, please
let me know.
As for breaking the image up, it's trivial with dd, a standard unix
utility
David Marquis wrote:
Hello Michael,
I can host it for awhile. Please send me email
directly and we can discuss it.
I'm not Michael, but I wanted to point out that I'm already hosting it.
There's a bunch of discussion of it being on renegade.sparks.net. You
are, of course, welcome to
Kirk McLoren wrote:
Sulphur is not added as a lubricant. WHere do they get that rubbish?
Kirk
It's not deliberately added, but sulfur does indeed provide a lot of
lubrication for the injector pump. My understanding is that it needs to
be replaced in very low sulfur fuel, BD makes a great
Ken Provost wrote:
On Mar 4, 2006, at 7:57 AM, robert luis rabello wrote:
How can we take our own country back if the electoral system is
rigged against our wishes? I used to complain that the German
people of the 1930's essentially did nothing to check the rise of the
National
I have a mostly idle server with a 100 Mbit connection to the AOL/TW
backbone. Obviously,
using it all would be frowned upon, but I'm willing to put it up and see
what happens.
Has anybody already downloaded it? It sounds like it's not going to
happen very fast.
Please let me know
Evergreen Solutions wrote:
If there is somebody who has succeeded in getting these, make a
.torrent and host it somewhere and put up the link...better sharing
for everyone.
I have a mostly idle server with a 100 Mbit connection to the AOL/TW
backbone. Obviously,
using it all would be
doug wrote:
Logan Vilas wrote:
I'm having the same problems downloading the link, but I'm downloading the
entire web site. I'll see how that goes. So far it's about 30-50kb/s
Logan Vilas
After several attempts at the cd.iso file, I just started going through
the links and DL
Joe Street wrote:
Thanks Jim;
I'm not a chemist so maybe you can fill me in on the reaction. Air is
about 80% nitrogen so is the degradation that people have been
referring to as oxidation just a generalized term that includes a
nitrification process as well?
Joe
PS Helium is
Greg and April wrote:
Just because something appears to work, does not mean that it actualy does,
unless conclusive scientific testing - that eliminates any other possible
variables as the actual reason for the improvement, proves it does.
*** Sorry Keith, but, it's time for the pro-magnet
, but not the opossite. And that means
statistically something.
Please, show us where the EPA confirmed a significant increase. I'll
wait. You'll excuse me if I don't find the manufacturers claims
credible, I hope.
--- David
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL
Andres Secco wrote:
Dear all,
Magnets are being offered through spam e-mail and its has been so since
early '90 ties.
The professional use of magnets is very wide. My experience in industrial
cooling towers, boilers and engines is very possitive and in some cases have
it documented.
How
Andres Secco wrote:
All will depend on how strong is the magnet. With 6000 gauss or more settled
in the gasoline inlet will be enough to get good results on the gas
efficiency. Also engine runs much better.
Polarization of different materials including boilers fuel, gasoline
engines,
Joe Street wrote:
Well there may be something to this. It may not be the main source of
greenhouse gas but IIRC methane is 6 times more potent as a greenhouse
gas than CO2 and there are a lot of cows being grown to serve the
north american obsession with beef. And they do fart a hell of a
From
http://www.theledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060208/ZNYT02/602080410
Published Wednesday, February 8, 2006
86 Evangelical Leaders Join to Fight Global Warming
By LAURIE GOODSTEIN
New York Times
Despite opposition from some of their colleagues, 86 evangelical
Christian
Marty Phee wrote:
One disturbing article I saw was about China. They've decided to stop
buying so much US debt and diversify their holdings. What happens
when we can't sell our debt? Also, the US foreign policy is losing
ground to China. Their making friends/alliances with many more
Keith Addison wrote:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11743.htm
Annexing Khuzestan; battle-plans for Iran
By Mike Whitney
[snip]
The bottom line on the bourse is this; the dollar is underwritten by
a national debt that now exceeds $8 trillion dollars and trade
deficits
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A potentially weird aside: If woody feedstocks are effective, I wonder if
the paper industry could make ethanol from their pulp, and still use the
resultant stock for paper production?
As mentioned in the original, wood is composed primarily of lignin and
cellulose.
Paul S Cantrell wrote:
Mark,
I agree that a 50 kVA genset is overkill unless you live in a mansion,
BUT you can check with your local utility (Reliant? or Coop?) about
Net Metering. Since your meter would run backward, you could 'store'
power into the grid when you run it and pull power
robert luis rabello wrote:
Michael Redler wrote:
[snip]
Yet the religious principle of do no harm to your neighbor and do
not harm a child come directly from a tradition far older than
psychology and the field of child development. (I can give you book,
chapter and verse in the
Keith Addison wrote:
Hello David
I could perhaps agree with the point you're making, but I think you
stretch it so far it breaks.
robert luis rabello wrote:
Michael Redler wrote:
[snip]
Yet the religious principle of do no harm to your neighbor and do
not harm
- Original Message -
*From:* Joe Street mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*To:* Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
mailto:Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
*Sent:* Wednesday, January 11, 2006 2:00 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Biofuel] Dewatering with vacuum.
David Miller wrote
Jeromie Reeves wrote:
inline
David Miller wrote:
[snip]
I'm not sure what you're referring to in I should look for a 50. I'd
suggest looking for a dry pump that doesn't require oil lubrication.
These are commonly used for refridgeration or freeze drying of food,
should go
Appal Energy wrote:
And the rationale behind this? At least the official rationale?
I can think of one. How about start with the animals and get the system
down pat. Then with the stroke of a pen go for the humans?
I thought it was obvious. The stated goal as I understand it is to be
William Adams wrote:
Your water-to-steam volume change calculation is not correct. The
correct volume increase is 1,244x, obtained as follows: One mole
(molecular wt. in gm) of liquid water = 18 gm = 18 cc. One mole of
steam = 18 gm h2o vapor = 22,400 cc. At standard temperature and
logan vilas wrote:
Water boils off at 43F at 20-50mmhg of vacuum at sea level. At 140F it
takes about 150-200mmhg. When fluids are mixed togther the Pressure of
Vaporization changes especially when thouroughly mixed. You do not
need a condensor if you are useing a AC type vacuum
Zeke Yewdall wrote:
Come on Mike. How do you argue that a perpetual motion machine
wouldn't be useful?
Perpetual motion machines could indeed be useful. And the patent office
WILL grant patents on them. You just have to provide them with one as
proof:) I expect to be showing them mine
bob allen wrote:
Howdy Teoman,
looking back in the archives I find the link:
http://tinyurl.com/8hjv7
this is to a patent application, not a patent. Even if the process is
patented, does that mean that
the patent office has checked out the process and confirms that it actually
works as
Mike Weaver wrote:
HAY David then pills you sold me dont werk MIKE
Mike, like I told you, you have to take them longer. At least 30 days,
and if you miss a day you have to start all over. You obviously missed
a day, so I'll be expecting your next order right away!
--- David
David
Joe Acquisto wrote:
Zeke Yewdall[EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/16/05 3:01 PM
Although it doesn't specify, I would suspect that this is a turbine
design, not a piston design. I've seen a 30kW steam turbine that
wasn't much larger than an AC compressor for a car. Add a heat
exhanger in
Paul S Cantrell wrote:
On 12/16/05, *David Kramer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouldn't such a steam engine increase the weight of the vehicle
and thereby the amount of energy needed to drive it?
David
David,
Yes I would think so, too.
I would have
From
http://news.tradingcharts.com/futures/0/9/73364090.html
/Sao Paulo, Dec 12, 2005 (EFE via COMTEX) -- /By Jaime Ortega Carrascal.
).- The flex fuel technology developed and implemented in Brazil that
allows a car to run on either gasoline or alcohol has revolutionized the
local auto
Zeke Yewdall wrote:
Yet they are already being sued over drugs like vioxx. Are the
threats of law suits any higher for vaccines than for other drugs
released with insufficient testing?
Vaccinations have their own special problems. For starters, they're all
different and
time-sensitive.
Mike Weaver wrote:
I've done some initial research but haven't delved into one. Sooner or
later I'll find an oil furnace someone is throwing away and see what I
can do.
If I had to cut the BD with another agent to make it easier to use I
would do that. Does anyone have any suggestions?
Keith Addison wrote:
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 19:00:47 EST
Reply-To: Sustainable Agriculture Network Discussion Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Free Range Birds and Avian Flu
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
We need to even the playing field and get a true
Keith Addison wrote:
Helklo David
I think you don't know much about organics, eh?
Not as much as you or others on this list. More than most though.
Try this:
An Agricultural Testament by Sir Albert Howard, Oxford University Press, 1940.
11. The Retreat of the Crop and the Animal before
Mike Weaver wrote:
All kidding aside, do the members of this list think the idea of an
advocacy group to defend BD has merit, and more importantly
would anyone pay to be a member?
I would pay something just to support the cause. Probably in the
$50-100 range.
--- David
Joe Street wrote:
Why not just add some of the dye yourself ..doh!
Because here in the states they put the dye in the untaxed fuel (HHO,
K1), not in the stuff that's taxed. So adding dye would be a way of
saying that you didn't pay taxes on fuel that you actually had.
--- David
For anyone interested in the veracity of our elections, this slashdot
discussion is very troubling:
http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/05/11/29/2024208.shtml?tid=103tid=123tid=219
There's reference in the article to what statistically looks like fraud
here:
in a long time to make it worthwhile financially.
--- David
Joe
David Miller wrote:
Joe Street wrote:
Why not just add some of the dye yourself ..doh!
Because here in the states they put the dye in the untaxed fuel (HHO,
K1), not in the stuff that's taxed. So adding dye
robert luis rabello wrote:
Greg and April wrote:
This makes allot more sense.
[snip]
#5I wonder if it makes a difference if the 100 hours at 15 mph or at 75
mph?
It won't. The unit is not tied into the onboard fuel injection
management computer. From what I
Darryl McMahon wrote:
when water is broken down to O2 and H2 applied to fuel at a rate of 1/375?
So now we are supposed to believe that some device will improve efficiency
Catalysts can work at even lower ratios.
That's not really relevent here since we're not talking about any kind
William Adams wrote:
David,
Thanks for the correction of air intake. Agreed, it would be good to look at
the beast. Can the anecdotes can be believed ? And, is the concept for real?
Let's try putting a couple of things together here
Darryl says:
According to the CHEC website
William Adams wrote:
Interesting calculation, and good for back-of-the-envelope stuff. I
just wanted to point out that an 1800 RPM 10 liter engine will consume
150 liters of air/second, not 300 since it only takes in air every other
stroke.
That's assuming a 4 stroke engine, of course:) In
Alt.EnergyNetwork wrote:
It might be a good idea to get rid of
those nasty Diebolt rigged voting machines that left no paper trail.
During the election the ceo of that co, told Bush I'll deliver Ohio.
This is being parroted way out of context. The CEO of Diebold was
chairman of some
MH wrote:
Sounds like a great conference! This paragraph caught my attention:
A second coal story came out of Great Falls, where the City Council
voted 4-1 to spend $2 million of that city’s funds on “preparations”
for the proposed 250 megawatt Highwood coal-burning power plant east
of the
Kurt Nolte wrote:
On 10/16/05, *Jeromie Reeves* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about a rotary engine that doest take those delicate graphite
seals?
Long story short
I had one via my lil brother that only had 1 working cell and
still put
out
robert luis rabello wrote:
I've been looking at this one for a long time:
http://www.freedom-motors.com/
Apparently, it can run as a gen set with externally mixed diesel fuel
and the engine puts out very little in the way of pollution. Unlike
some of the other manufacturers
Kurt Nolte wrote:
From what I understand, a rotary engine is actually a step
/down/ in
thermal efficiency; maybe it's just the materials used, but I
seem to
hear something about how they may have more power density, but their
thermal efficiency suffers too
robert luis rabello wrote:
David Miller wrote:
I love looking at new engines:) How'd that old mazda commercial go?
Engines that go h ?
You're dating yourself, now! (And me, too!)
Hey, I can remember Coke I'd like to teach the world to sing
commercial. I
Keith Addison wrote:
Hello David
snip
Forgot this bit...
I also wonder what people are really doing with the leftover glycerine
and wash water with excess methanol. I suspect a lot of both get
dumped, as do batches that just go bad. I don't know that, but would
be interested to hear from
Bobby Clark wrote:
Why are there not a lot of people manufacturing biodiesel? Is it because
that petro diesel is cheaper? It seems that I have seen estimates of between
$2-$3 per gallon if you make it from virgin oil. If it burns cleaner (which
it does) then why aren't manufacturers taking
Darryl McMahon wrote:
Kurt Nolte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/3/05, Paul S Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
iI live near Charleston, SC USA about 40 miles from the coast,/i so it
gets cold for a few weeks or a couple of months depending on your definition
of cold. Anyway heating
Joe Street wrote:
Careful. Even a modest vacuum will result in tremendous forces
developing on the large surface area of that drum which is way too
wimpy metal for the job as a vacuum vessel. You will end up crushing
the drum and making a huge mess!
I'll give odds on the sheet
Zeke Yewdall wrote:
You can actually buy C-PVC pipe for hot water piping here. Since the
heat exchanger is not going to be operating at over 90C or so, it
should work fine, except that it may be very difficult to get 100mm
diamter CPVC. Normally anything that large is drain pipe not hot
water
Ken Riznyk wrote:
Here in Pennsylvania diesel cars are exempt from
emission inspections. I was recently bear hunting in
Maine. The local folks told me that Maine no longer
permits sales of Jetta TDI's because of diesel
emissions. My question is this - what pollutes more? A
cleaner gas
Ken Dunn wrote:
On 9/20/05, *Zeke Yewdall* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The best collectors are actually vaccuum tubes, to reduce
convective losses.
This leads me to believe that creating a lower profile box and
reducing dead airspace would be very
Ken Dunn wrote:
On 9/20/05, *David Miller* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It probably wouldn't make much difference. Windows need an inch or so
between the panes for best R-value; less is not always
better. There's
a point where more wouldn't
Greg and April wrote:
Ok, given the same vehicle ( and about the same weight ), how does one
go about picking a replacement engine and perhaps the replacing
the transmission as well?
The reason I ask, is that I would like to replace the engine I have
with a better engine, but, I don't
Zeke Yewdall wrote:
One major way acceleration hurts is that engines are set to richen the
mixture during hard acceleration in order to prevent detonation
(knocking, pinging) at high cylinder pressures.
Does this apply to diesel engines which almost always operate with
excess oxygen?
Not if
Tom Irwin wrote:
Hi All,
Hi Tom;
Sorry I had to laugh to keep from crying. Let's see, Bush and the
neocons will use weapons of mass destruction on bad people thinking
about making weapons of mass destruction. Exactly who are the bad
people. Oh Brave New World. Someone ought to tell
Joe Street wrote:
I think for otherwise identical cars, a medium sized engine (but
smaller than what most cars come with nowdays) will get better
mileage, because it can accellerate fast enough to get out of the fuel
dumping acceleration, and into more fuel efficient cruising faster.
If
Kirk McLoren wrote:
Sometimes engineering proposals are just gee whiz stuff. Just to show
that you are capable of thinking outside the box. They don't have to
have much to do with practicality. The hazard to air navigation is
enough to scuttle this idea let alone the liability
Keith Addison wrote:
Hello David
Hi Keith:)
I expect that's covered under free speech.
I'd personally rate Robertsons comments as up there with any number
of people who advocate the death of Bush for crimes against humanity
or somesuch. If Bush were assasinated would these people really
Hakan Falk wrote:
Robert,
A question,
In many countries death threat and instigation of murdering a person
is against the criminal laws. Is it not the same in US and if, why
have they not arrested and questioned Robertson?
It's tempting to reply to the effect that he's a supporter of Bush
Hakan Falk wrote:
David,
So it is legal in US to suggest that a man should be assassinated?
I expect that's covered under free speech.
I'd personally rate Robertsons comments as up there with any number of
people who advocate the death of Bush for crimes against humanity or
somesuch. If
79 matches
Mail list logo
