- Original Message -
From: motie_d [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 5:54 PM
Subject: [biofuel] Re: EPA Ruling Backfires, Spurs Sales of
Diesel Trucks
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Appal Energy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay...Nothing more inviting
Message -
From: motie_d [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 6:09 PM
Subject: [biofuel] Re: EPA Ruling Backfires, Spurs Sales of
Diesel Trucks
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Appal Energy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for tax allocation, it sounds as if you're
of time sleeping and a boatload of time
trying to keep people from mowing down all the good green stuff.
Todd
- Original Message -
From: motie_d [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 8:20 PM
Subject: [biofuel] Re: EPA Ruling Backfires, Spurs Sales of
Diesel
- Original Message -
From: motie_d [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 18:57
Subject: [biofuel] Re: EPA Ruling Backfires, Spurs Sales of Diesel Trucks
Can I produce Methane from their droppings?
Yes.
Can they be trained to poop in a sample
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 10:09:16PM -, motie_d wrote:
Perhaps Sports Stadiums should be forced to raise ticket prices by
$10 each for a couple of seasons to raise funds to build a new
Stadium,
Unfortunately, what seems to be happening more and more is the taxpayer is
forced to pay
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 06:36:53PM -0400, Appal Energy wrote:
Motie,
How 'bout just makin' it simple for us poor knee jerk
reactionaries whose knees don't work as fast as they used to?
Exactly where is it that your trucker buds are getting bled dry
and other consumers of road use fuel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 10:56 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: EPA Ruling Backfires, Spurs Sales of Diesel
Trucks
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 10:09:16PM -, motie_d wrote:
Perhaps Sports Stadiums should be forced to raise ticket prices by
$10 each
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 10:22:34PM -, motie_d wrote:
Because that is what consumers will buy. If no one was buying Harleys
because of the noise, they would quiet them down.
That's irrelevant -- the fact is that their exhaust system is illegal, and
something needs to be done about it.
1:43 AM
Subject: [biofuel] Re: EPA Ruling Backfires, Spurs Sales of Diesel Trucks
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Harmon Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's irrelevant -- the fact is that their exhaust system is
illegal, and
something needs to be done about it. It's irrelevant
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 06:43:09AM -, motie_d wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Harmon Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's irrelevant -- the fact is that their exhaust system is
illegal, and
something needs to be done about it. It's irrelevant what the
riders want or
what
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 05:43:38PM +0900, Keith Addison wrote:
Eric wrote:
I think I should have to disagree about the loud pipes on bikes though.
We know that 4 out of 5 motorcycle accidents are the cars fault. Cars
notice bikes with loud pipes.
... Yes, and it probably annoys them
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 06:56:20AM -0500, Larry Ruebush wrote:
European countries already have a hand in the US truck market. Freightliner
and Sterling trucks are owned by Mercedes as well as Detroit Diesel. Volvo
owns Volvo trucks and Mack. Volvo makes several diesel engines in Europe that
and retailer
of such crap Harmon.
Kirk
-Original Message-
From: Harmon Seaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002 6:18 AM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: EPA Ruling Backfires, Spurs Sales of Diesel
Trucks
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 05:43:38PM +0900, Keith
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 04:26:16AM -, motie_d wrote:
I'm hesitant to jump into the middle of a hot debate, but IMHO the
reason Cummins doesn't (not can't) build better Diesel engines, is
the same reason Mercedes VW etc. won't/don't sell them here. Very
poor fuel!
Yes -- but
Okay...Nothing more inviting in a discussion than
all-encompassing, generally sweeping statements like the one
below.
Don't suppose anyone has ever calculated the proportions of road
tax expenditures to see how much went to bicycle paths, how much
went to pot holes and by-passes and how much
Seaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 6:07 AM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: EPA Ruling Backfires, Spurs Sales of Diesel
Trucks
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 04:26:16AM -, motie_d wrote:
I'm hesitant to jump into the middle of a hot debate, but IMHO
It seems the whole of US manufacturing is blatantly unintelligent, at times
vigorously so. They seemed focused on partnerships and friend ships like
its a high school popularity contest!
I think I should have to disagree about the loud pipes on bikes though.
We know that 4 out of 5
- Original Message -
From: Harmon Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 06:07
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: EPA Ruling Backfires, Spurs Sales of Diesel
Trucks
I was out fishing the other night and some asshole in a *huge* inboard
boat
in go to their making money.
That is the alpha and the omega of it.
Kirk
-Original Message-
From: Harmon Seaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 6:07 AM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: EPA Ruling Backfires, Spurs Sales of Diesel
Trucks
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 07:55:11PM +, Eric Ruttan wrote:
It seems the whole of US manufacturing is blatantly unintelligent, at times
vigorously so. They seemed focused on partnerships and friend ships like
its a high school popularity contest!
I think I should have to disagree about
20 matches
Mail list logo
