Alison Chaiken píše v St 18. 03. 2015 v 00:07 -0700:
After reading about the 'minimal build' on the systemd wiki, I decided
to experiment.
0. WIth basically all options turned on, in a Fedora 21 Qemu, systemd
used about 300 MB of memory according to 'sudo memstat -p 1'.
1. With
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 01:54:46PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Peter Hutterer
peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
This builtin parses properties in the form
EV_ABS_OVERRIDE_00=min:max:res:fuzz:flat
The concept sounds good. hwdb is definitely the place
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net schrieb:
Am 19.03.2015 um 22:04 schrieb Kai Krakow:
Christoph Pleger christoph.ple...@cs.tu-dortmund.de schrieb:
I am experimenting a little with systemd and trying to define a new
intermediate runlevel, a runlevel between basic.target and
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 08:26:28AM -0700, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
Hi Dimitri,
On 16 March 2015 at 23:15, Marcel Holtmann mar...@holtmann.org wrote:
Hi Dimitri,
This makes it easier to apply stable branch patches on top of the
release tarball.
---
Makefile.am | 4 +++-
1 file
This builtin parses properties in the form
EV_ABS_OVERRIDE_00=min:max:res:fuzz:flat
and applies them to the kernel device. Future processes that open that device
will see the updated EV_ABS range.
This is particularly useful for touchpads that don't provide a resolution in
the kernel driver but
Hello,
I am experimenting a little with systemd and trying to define a new
intermediate runlevel, a runlevel between basic.target and
multi-user.target. This means that I want the services which are
required
by my new runlevel to be started after all services from basic.target
have
been
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Christoph Pleger
christoph.ple...@cs.tu-dortmund.de wrote:
Hello,
I am experimenting a little with systemd and trying to define a new
intermediate runlevel, a runlevel between basic.target and
multi-user.target. This means that I want the services which are
On 19 March 2015 at 10:00, Christoph Pleger
christoph.ple...@cs.tu-dortmund.de wrote:
Hello,
I am experimenting a little with systemd and trying to define a new
intermediate runlevel, a runlevel between basic.target and
multi-user.target. This means that I want the services which are
This property is in usec (like the TimeUSec property) and allows
retrieving the timezone offset for the machine. This is particularly
usable for remote callers.
---
src/timedate/timedated.c | 20 +++-
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
On 19 March 2015 at 12:09, Christoph Pleger
christoph.ple...@cs.tu-dortmund.de wrote:
Hello,
So, if the original unit file multi-user.target contains
After=basic.target rescue.service rescue.target
this after does not really mean anything and jobs wanted or required
by
multi-user.target
Hi
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Peter Hutterer
peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
This builtin parses properties in the form
EV_ABS_OVERRIDE_00=min:max:res:fuzz:flat
The concept sounds good. hwdb is definitely the place to put this,
rather than static kernel fixups.
and applies them to the
Hello,
So, if the original unit file multi-user.target contains
After=basic.target rescue.service rescue.target
this after does not really mean anything and jobs wanted or required
by
multi-user.target can already be started when some jobs from
basic.target
have not been started???
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Christoph Pleger
christoph.ple...@cs.tu-dortmund.de wrote:
Hello,
So, if the original unit file multi-user.target contains
After=basic.target rescue.service rescue.target
this after does not really mean anything and jobs wanted or required
by
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Christoph Pleger
christoph.ple...@cs.tu-dortmund.de wrote:
Hello,
So, if the original unit file multi-user.target contains
After=basic.target rescue.service rescue.target
this after does not really mean anything and jobs wanted or required
by
Am 19.03.2015 um 13:09 schrieb Christoph Pleger:
What is the the
problem you are trying to solve by implementing a new 'intermediate'
runlevel ?
I want a program to be run at boot time without any other systemd services
starting concurrently. The program needs the services from basic.target
Hello,
So, if the original unit file multi-user.target contains
After=basic.target rescue.service rescue.target
this after does not really mean anything and jobs wanted or required
by
multi-user.target can already be started when some jobs from
basic.target
have not been started???
В Thu, 19 Mar 2015 15:23:41 -0400
Nekrasov, Alexander alexander.nekra...@emc.com пишет:
Hi All,
Suppose I have a B.service that's doing important work, and an A.service
that's watching over B memory consumption. So I want to start A when I start
B, and stop A when I stop B. Also B, being
Hi Michael,
On 16 March 2015 at 23:15, Marcel Holtmann mar...@holtmann.org wrote:
Hi Dimitri,
Just tell patch or git to skip the hunks modifying ids-update.pl and
sdio.ids. Problem solved.
I'll apply the patch, but with a slightly different motivation.
[L]GPL requires commercial
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 08:33:52PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
From: Goffredo Baroncelli kreij...@inwind.it
Add a new tmpfiles.d snippets to set the NOCOW attributes for the
journal files. This allow better perfomance when the root file system
is BTRFS. Pay attention that the NOCOW
2015-03-21 13:12 GMT+01:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 06:43:18PM -0700, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
Hi Zbyszek,
On 16 March 2015 at 23:15, Marcel Holtmann mar...@holtmann.org wrote:
Hi Dimitri,
Just tell patch or git to skip the hunks modifying
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 06:43:18PM -0700, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
Hi Zbyszek,
On 16 March 2015 at 23:15, Marcel Holtmann mar...@holtmann.org wrote:
Hi Dimitri,
This makes it easier to apply stable branch patches on top of the
release tarball.
---
Makefile.am | 4 +++-
1 file
Short version:
--
Instead of machinectl clone using btrfs snapshots, or even needing
to store things in a var/lib/machines Btrfs subvolume, does it meet
the requirements for Btrfs optimization to do this with cp -a
--reflink instead?
Why? Nested subvolumes are confusing. And
Hi Zbyszek,
On 16 March 2015 at 23:15, Marcel Holtmann mar...@holtmann.org wrote:
Hi Dimitri,
This makes it easier to apply stable branch patches on top of the
release tarball.
---
Makefile.am | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Makefile.am
В Thu, 19 Mar 2015 15:08:39 -0400
Nekrasov, Alexander alexander.nekra...@emc.com пишет:
Hi All,
With these settings
[Service]
ExecStart=/cli run
ExecStop=/cli stop
Type=forking
PIDFile=/tmp/cli.pid
The service is active once cli run exits. A call to systemctl stop then
produces a
On 19 March 2015 at 16:29, Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-03-19 17:07 GMT+01:00 David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com wrote:
So, +1 for Dimitri's patch. Looks correct to me.
Unless someone objects, I'm planning on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
That tells me that the ExecReload command (kill) is also
restricted by CapabilityBoundingSet. Is this expected [..]?
recent systemd has more problems in context of systemctl and
restricting even PID1 itself in a way no longer be able to kill
On 03/03/2015 01:36 PM, Steve Dickson wrote:
Its been reported that having the rpc-statd-notify service
depend on network.target instead network-online.target
decrease boot times as much as 10 seconds on some
installs
Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183293
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 02:05:00PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Michael Olbrich
m.olbr...@pengutronix.de wrote:
it seems we're getting a lot of btrfs stuff here. Maybe we should ship a
copy of btrfs.h instead?
All these definitions where introduced with
On 19 March 2015 at 13:31, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov
dimitri.j.led...@intel.com wrote:
---
Makefile.am | 2 +-
units/systemd-resolved.service.in| 29 -
Hi
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Michael Olbrich
m.olbr...@pengutronix.de wrote:
---
Hi,
it seems we're getting a lot of btrfs stuff here. Maybe we should ship a
copy of btrfs.h instead?
All these definitions where introduced with linux-3.8 (well, the
header was moved to linux/btrfs.h
Hi
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov
dimitri.j.led...@intel.com wrote:
---
Makefile.am | 2 +-
units/systemd-resolved.service.in| 29 -
units/systemd-resolved.service.m4.in | 31 +++
3
Hi
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Stef Walter st...@redhat.com wrote:
This property is in usec (like the TimeUSec property) and allows
retrieving the timezone offset for the machine. This is particularly
usable for remote callers.
---
src/timedate/timedated.c | 20 +++-
On 19.03.2015 14:39, David Herrmann wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Stef Walter st...@redhat.com wrote:
This property is in usec (like the TimeUSec property) and allows
retrieving the timezone offset for the machine. This is particularly
usable for remote callers.
---
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Christoph Pleger
christoph.ple...@cs.tu-dortmund.de wrote:
Hello,
Then, I still do not understand why my definition of a new target did
not
work. What is the difference between multi-user.target waiting for
basic.target on the one hand and new.target waiting
Hi
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Stef Walter st...@redhat.com wrote:
On 19.03.2015 14:39, David Herrmann wrote:
Hmm, so this is a convenience call. You could just set tm.tm_zone
locally and use mktime() with the value retrieved by Timezone? Yeah,
the time-api is awful with global
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:23 AM, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Chris Morgan chmor...@gmail.com wrote:
---
man/journal-remote.conf.xml| 111
+
man/systemd-journal-remote.xml | 1 +
2 files
Hi
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Chris Morgan chmor...@gmail.com wrote:
---
man/journal-remote.conf.xml| 111
+
man/systemd-journal-remote.xml | 1 +
2 files changed, 112 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 man/journal-remote.conf.xml
diff
Hello,
Then, I still do not understand why my definition of a new target did
not
work. What is the difference between multi-user.target waiting for
basic.target on the one hand and new.target waiting for basic.target and
multi-user.target waiting for new.target on the other hand, aside from
Hi
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Peter Paule systemd-de...@fedux.org wrote:
Hi,
starting a container works fine. I'm running now systemd from git. Last
commit is 1b41981d9a62443d566df6bcabc1b5024e9f5e4a which changes things with
container-getty.
$ sudo machinectl start test-server
Hi
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:21 PM, WaLyong Cho walyong@samsung.com wrote:
Hi,
I want to find best solution on our case. Our product is mobile device.
But I don't think that is only problem of mobile device. That also can
be problem of laptop. So, please comment to me.
We have some of
Am 19.03.2015 um 18:04 schrieb Nusenu:
That tells me that the ExecReload command (kill) is also
restricted by CapabilityBoundingSet. Is this expected [..]?
recent systemd has more problems in context of systemctl and
restricting even PID1 itself in a way no longer be able to kill
processes
Am 19.03.2015 um 18:00 schrieb Uoti Urpala:
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 18:41 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com wrote:
The summary of my reply was What you probably want, is hook into
basic.target or sysinit.target, use
В Thu, 19 Mar 2015 08:39:18 -0700
Alison Chaiken ali...@she-devel.com пишет:
I ran systemd 219 with most recent patches and
-PAM -AUDIT -SELINUX -IMA -APPARMOR -SMACK +SYSVINIT -UTMP
-LIBCRYPTSETUP -GCRYPT -GNUTLS -ACL -XZ -LZ4 -SECCOMP +BLKID -ELFUTILS
+KMOD -IDN
and, to compare, with
Hi
I see device specific ones at
http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.resource-control.html
I was wondering, whether it would be feasible to add bandwidth limits
either by size or percentage for any particular service? squid, torrent
daemons etc could use this.
Rahul
On 03/03/2015 12:28 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
Hello NFS developers,
reposting the two patches inline as requested by Steve.
I'm currently systemd-ifying our nfs-utils Ubuntu package. For testing I put
the NFS server and client (i. e. localhost:/foo/bar mounts) on the same
machine. With
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 18:41 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com wrote:
The summary of my reply was What you probably want, is hook into
basic.target or sysinit.target, use DefaultDependencies=no, and
specify the
On Thursday, March 19, 2015, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:21 PM, WaLyong Cho walyong@samsung.com
javascript:; wrote:
Hi,
I want to find best solution on our case. Our product is mobile device.
But I don't think that is only problem of
On 19.03.2015 15:17, David Herrmann wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Stef Walter st...@redhat.com wrote:
On 19.03.2015 14:39, David Herrmann wrote:
Hmm, so this is a convenience call. You could just set tm.tm_zone
locally and use mktime() with the value retrieved by Timezone?
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 14:27 +0100, Christoph Pleger wrote:
Then, I still do not understand why my definition of a new target did
not
work. What is the difference between multi-user.target waiting for
basic.target on the one hand and new.target waiting for basic.target and
2015-03-19 15:46 GMT+01:00 Uoti Urpala uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi:
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 14:27 +0100, Christoph Pleger wrote:
Then, I still do not understand why my definition of a new target did
not
work. What is the difference between multi-user.target waiting for
basic.target on the one
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 02:44:47AM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Alison Chaiken ali...@she-devel.com wrote:
http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/MinimalBuilds/ says that
the minimum requirements are udev and journald. I wonder if udev is
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 08:39:18AM -0700, Alison Chaiken wrote:
I ran systemd 219 with most recent patches and
-PAM -AUDIT -SELINUX -IMA -APPARMOR -SMACK +SYSVINIT -UTMP
-LIBCRYPTSETUP -GCRYPT -GNUTLS -ACL -XZ -LZ4 -SECCOMP +BLKID -ELFUTILS
+KMOD -IDN
and, to compare, with
+PAM +AUDIT
2015-03-19 17:07 GMT+01:00 David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com wrote:
So, +1 for Dimitri's patch. Looks correct to me.
Unless someone objects, I'm planning on merging it.
Yes, please go ahead. I missed that .busname is not
2015-03-19 15:02 GMT+01:00 Dimitri John Ledkov dimitri.j.led...@intel.com:
On 19 March 2015 at 13:31, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov
dimitri.j.led...@intel.com wrote:
---
Makefile.am | 2 +-
Hi
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-03-19 15:02 GMT+01:00 Dimitri John Ledkov dimitri.j.led...@intel.com:
On 19 March 2015 at 13:31, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov
I ran systemd 219 with most recent patches and
-PAM -AUDIT -SELINUX -IMA -APPARMOR -SMACK +SYSVINIT -UTMP
-LIBCRYPTSETUP -GCRYPT -GNUTLS -ACL -XZ -LZ4 -SECCOMP +BLKID -ELFUTILS
+KMOD -IDN
and, to compare, with
+PAM +AUDIT +SELINUX +IMA -APPARMOR +SMACK +SYSVINIT +UTMP
+LIBCRYPTSETUP +GCRYPT
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com wrote:
The summary of my reply was What you probably want, is hook into
basic.target or sysinit.target, use DefaultDependencies=no, and
specify the dependencies/orderings explicitly.
Apparently, this didn't stick.
The reality
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Alison Chaiken ali...@she-devel.com
wrote:
http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/MinimalBuilds/ says that
the minimum requirements are udev and journald. I wonder if udev is
really needed if the kernel is completely statically compiled and
module
58 matches
Mail list logo
