. This is what
the access:conditional tag is for.
On 2015-02-03 11:15, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Feb 3, 2015 4:11 AM, Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
On Tue Feb 3 09:36:21 2015 GMT, Colin Smale wrote:
On 2015-02-03 10:20, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Feb 3, 2015 3:06 AM, Colin Smale colin.sm
Assuming you are talking about the hard shoulder AKA emergency lane
on motorways, in NL and GB it would quite simply be access=no. The
only exceptions are if you break down, if you are an emergency service,
or if you are instructed to by the police (or similar authority).
On 2015-02-02 14:17,
Tag namespaces already provide a kind of data structure facility. IMHO
a syntax that is close to the traditional way of representing vectors of
structures would be something like this:
addr[1]:housenumber=1234
addr[1]:street=Main Street
addr[2]:housenumber=7654
addr[2]:street=Elm Avenue
All
On 2015-01-09 12:25, Dave F. wrote:
I'll leave them for now, as I can work around them, but I'm still not
convinced of their use or comments given by others as reasons to keep them.
Out of respect to the mappers who have gone before you, isn't a valid
excuse to keep data if it's
In NL I think it is similar to Germany. The definition of the sign is
verplicht fietspad i.e. compulsory cycle track. When the cycle track
runs adjacent to a road the intention is clear, but the sign is
interestingly also used for cycle paths through the middle of the
countryside with no
On 2014-12-18 14:42, Friedrich Volkmann wrote:
On 17.12.2014 23:23, Colin Smale wrote:
In the UK designation= is in wide usage for this. I don't know if it
is typically a UK thing (it wouldn't surprise me) but local
governments sometimes have the right to change their style - for
example
In the UK designation= is in wide usage for this. I don't know if it
is typically a UK thing (it wouldn't surprise me) but local governments
sometimes have the right to change their style - for example a civil
parish can choose autonomously to call itself a community council. It
can also choose
I agree with Greg. Many people still think it is possible to get
worldwide consensus on tagging. This will never happen as long as the
tags are so subjective. Check out the thread on the definitions of
cafe/restaurant/fast_food for a wonderful case of what happens if the
input side rules the
Big +1 for that.
To me, solving it from the root means formalising the use of the
semicolon as a value separator, and cracking some hard nuts like how to
handle a legitimate semicolon in the data itself and how to handle the
quoting/escaping that that will involve.
But let's do it once and
in the underlying data model,
will require a change to the database layout, the XML/PBF formats, and
of course to numerous pieces of software.
Colin
On 2014-11-27 12:59, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
On 27/11/2014, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Big +1 for that.
-1.
On what do you
Let's look at the entity relations in play here. Surely a club IS an
organisation, not a building. The club MAY USE one or more buildings,
and MAY OWN one or more buildings. A club HAS a contact address, HAS
members, HAS a board etc etc. So following the rules of one object,
one set of tags,
I would not expect the landuse value of the municipal bus company's HQ
to change if the bus company was privatised... Only the ownership will
have changed, nothing else. Actually, as the buildings are probably
leased from a property company anyway, even that would stay the same.
Just the
On 2014-08-28 15:53, Dan S wrote:
As Peter said, the default for services using OSM is always to assume
a way is _not_ oneway unless tagged otherwise.
Unless it is tagged as junction=roundabout
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On 2014-08-10 12:13, Никита wrote:
I.e they define this tag as subtype of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arch_bridge [5]. I don't see any real
application/use to bridge=humpback. Also, bridge=humpback does not
imply covered=yes by default. It does not define routing aspects or
adds any
or it is me who can drive everywhere at regular speed? This is
really subjective.
2014-08-10 16:47 GMT+04:00 Yves yve...@gmail.com:
There is a lot of things not of interest to the majority of users in OSM,
this is why it is rich.
Yves
On 10 août 2014 12:41:22 UTC+02:00, Colin Smale colin.sm
use traffic_calming=hump for this situation or some barrier=*?
cu fly
Am 10.08.2014 16:23, schrieb Colin Smale:
No need to define it as UK-only... such bridges occur across the whole world,
I am sure. The UK may be unique by having a specific road sign, which may
indicate that a bridge
--colin
On 2014-08-10 23:28, Richard Z. wrote:
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 06:14:24PM +0200, Colin Smale wrote:
It is neither constructed with the intention of calming traffic, nor is it
intended as any kind of barrier (a bridge is usually exactly the opposite!)
Let us not be afraid
On 2014-08-04 05:52, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
On Sun, 2014-08-03 at 13:19 -0700, Tod Fitch wrote:
Thinking about this there seems to be several items that distinguish a
fast food restaurant from other restaurants in my mind: 1. Does it
have a drive-through window? Yes implies fast food. 1. Are
What's your definition of townhouse? I suspect this word may be in use
around the world, meaning different things. What are the essential
characteristics? We have to try to be objective - it IS what is IS, but
what it is CALLED may vary.
On 2014-07-20 06:08, Hans De Kryger wrote:
Anyone
In the UK, some house names are added for vanity and these names are
not recognised for addressing purposes; the house has a number, and this
is what is in the official address. Other houses however (often old
properties along country lanes) actually have a house name instead of a
number. These
A signal-controlled roundabout reverts to being a normal roundabout if
the traffic signals are not working (assuming it is also signed as a
roundabout), so the presence/absence of the traffic signals cannot be a
criterion for it being a roundabout or not.
I expect most countries will have a
Tagging capital=* or admin_level=* on a place is IMHO not to be done
lightly. It is not actually an attribute of the place at all, because if
you moved the place to e.g. the middle of the Atlantic Ocean it would no
longer be a capital. It is an attribute of the relationship between the
place
See also the use of the admin_centre in boundary relations. This allows
a place to have a different role/importance for each admin area it is
in. An interesting case is Amsterdam, which is the capital of NL but not
the provincial capital of the province it is in (that's Haarlem). The
tagging
Have to disagree here. There are plenty of real uses for reversing a
way, and not everyone uses JOSM.
Colin
On 2014-04-12 22:43, Janko Mihelić wrote:
2014-04-12 20:39 GMT+02:00 John Packer john.pack...@gmail.com:
I have never used this key before because of the drawback you mentioned:
Well put André. +100.
On 2014-03-30 22:25, André Pirard wrote:
On 2014-03-29 14:13, SomeoneElse wrote : On 29/03/2014 12:41, nounours77
wrote:
As discussed in my earlier post, I think voting is important even for
specific service tags to make them offical.
Not really - OSM doesn't
? Therefore, we also often map how vehicles are supposed to use
these roads. See: access, oneway, maxspeed, surface, tracktype,
smoothness, height, restriction, etc.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Sorry, bad idea. We map the roads, not the vehicles
, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
They all sound much like offices (landuse=commercial) to me. Ownership has
nothing to do with land use. In this case, the city council happen to be the
users of the property, but if they need to downsize for whatever reason and
a particular building
Civil administration is surely hardly a land use. A council office is no
different to any other office. I suggest looking at planning zones and
their designations as a reference. Typically classifications like
residential, retail, commercial, industrial and agricultural are seen,
and changing
I would not call it an amenity, which is (to me, native UK English
speaker) something for the benefit/enjoyment of society as a whole (or
at least a large part of it). These days a planetarium is probably for
enjoyment/entertainment (suggesting leisure=planetarium).
Colin
On 2014-02-24
Hi,
In the last couple of years I have put in a lot of hours maintaining the
UK's admin boundaries in OSM. Having started in Kent (home territory) I
have gradually been fanning out to cover more and more of the country.
Although there is a lot of consistency in the tagging, one thing I
Strictly speaking belfry can mean either the whole tower or more
specifically the space where the bells are hung - usually near the top
of a tower. However I would suggest that in common English usage the
word is more closely associated with the space than with the
building.
I would prefer to
On 2014-02-01 17:30, Masi Master wrote:
Normally traffic signs belongs to the road to the next intersection/crossing.
That depends on the country - different jurisdictions have different
conventions. In the UK the sign's effect is often until further
notice, i.e. until there is another sign
On 2014-02-02 02:15, André Pirard wrote:
On 2014-02-01 17:39, Colin Smale wrote :
On 2014-02-01 17:30, Masi Master wrote:
Normally traffic signs belongs to the road to the next intersection/crossing.
That depends on the country - different jurisdictions have different
Drag lift is more generic - both t-bar and platter (and rope_tow) are
subtypes of drag lift. The distinction between t-bar, platter and
rope_tow is very important to some people (particularly inexperienced
skiers). In some areas like Austria the t-bar is more popular whereas in
France you see
with aerialway:occupancy=2
2014/1/22 Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl
Drag lift is more generic - both t-bar and platter (and rope_tow) are
subtypes of drag lift. The distinction between t-bar, platter and rope_tow is
very important to some people (particularly inexperienced skiers). In some
I agree.
In the UK there is a difference between no cycles and no cycling.
Although in general you may be correct that a dismounted cyclist is
effectively a pedestrian, there are also footways (or whatever you want
to call them) signed as no cycles, which means that in these cases a
/cycling-pavement-offence
Colin
On 2014-01-19 17:13, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2014/1/19 Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl
there are also footways (or whatever you want to call them) signed as no
cycles, which means that in these cases a dismounted cyclist is not
equivalent to a pedestrian
Nobody uses the archaic word omnibus these days. You may as well
suggest replacing car with horseless carriage.
I really think we are trying to square a circle here. There are
irreconcilable differences between countries, and we should not waste
our energy in a war of attrition. Whether a
On 2014-01-16 17:55, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2014/1/16 Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl
If the semantics of a tag/value are different by country, let us just
document the standards for that country and move on.
I'd prefer to use a different tag then, because that's what tagging
I am not sure why it was suddenly changed (today) from unsuitable to
discouraged, but Unsuitable for HGVs is seen frequently in the UK. To
my understanding there is a difference between the semantics of
unsuitable and discouraged, the former being a simple statement of
(official) opinion and
Be aware that road: you may only cycle on the cyclepath if the
cyclepath is going where you're headed is ambiguous.
1) if the cyclepath is going where you're headed, then (and only then)
are you allowed to use the cyclepath
2) if the cyclepath is going where you're headed, you are obliged
There are very many roads (in NL at least) marked with bicycle=no with
no explicit sign. It is implicit in the fact that a parallel cycle
track is marked as compulsory (blue round sign). IMHO the definition
of this sign (in law) is totally screwed. It is also used for cycle
tracks which are
Surely the boundary way itself is unlikely to have a name, other than a
synthetic a/b boundary? Unless of course the name refers to some
feature like a road or a river which in a specific case may be part of
the boundary. As administrative bodies (and their boundaries) are
usually hierarchical
OK, sorry if I misunderstood.
On 2013-11-06 11:25, Pieren wrote:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Surely the boundary way itself is unlikely to have a name, other than a
synthetic a/b boundary?
To clarify, my remark was just about the tag
In the UK we do the opposite. In Unitary Authorities, which combine
the role of the county with the district (sounds like the same as
the Kreisfreie Staedte) we tag the UA as admin_level=6, i.e. at the same
level as counties, and not admin_level=8 which is the level for the
districts.
We also
The tag used in the examples is military=exclusion_zone, whereas it has
been documented as access=exclusion_zone. The tagging makes sense in my
eyes, but the wiki needs bringing in line.
Colin
On 2013-10-30 09:08, Martin Vonwald wrote:
Hi!
2013/10/29 martinq osm-mart...@fantasymail.de
Of course we tag for the renderer (a.k.a. data consumer), that's the
only reason OSM exists. What we DON'T do, is deliberately tag
*incorrectly* to persuade the renderer to produce a desired result.
Renderers need to be able to make certain distinctions - if not based on
an explicit tag, then by
I would recommend making a clear distinction between the premises and the
activity. Lotteries are rarely carried out in shops, but the tickets are sold
in all manner of establishments with a different primary purpose. And whether
you can ever call gambling an amenity (for the public good) is
From a UK perspective my feeling is that houseware and home are not
synonyms - home suggests more furnishings, maybe lighting etc but not
so much the utilitarian objects that might be better labelled as
houseware.
Kitchenware would be a category of houseware; other categories/subsets
might
On 2013-09-03 13:45, Richard Welty wrote:
On 9/3/13 7:31 AM, John Sturdy wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:59 AM, François Lacombe
francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu wrote: Operator could be given
by operator=* and the effective owner by a new owner=* tag. What
about when a business is owned
Won't the calculated radius depend on the number of points on the way,
and the width of the road? If you look closely at the geometry of a
curved road in OSM it is of course made up of straight segments with a
certain angle between them. A right angle junction might be a 45 steps
of 2 degrees
In what way is this any different to any other road? Even on a government
maintained road you accept a degree of own responsibility. What additional
risks are we talking about here?
Colin
Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com wrote:
I am sure this has been asked many times before:
How do I tag
Surely Peter's point (which I agree with) is that leisure and sport are
two different things, and should not be seen as mutually exclusive or as
competitors to each other. There are many sports which (can) take place
in a (suitable) swimming pool (swimming, diving, water polo etc), but
not all
The UK Government seem to think an HGV starts at 3.5t GVW, not 7.5t.
By those standards, hgv=no is not a correct transposition of the sign
with a lorry+weight(7.5t) symbol. Nor is maxweight=7.5 (I think) because
it only applies to goods vehicles - not buses/coaches for example
(correct me if
What about the difference in signalling systems? As I understand it,
what I would call a Tram is completely under control of the driver.
He/she alone decides when to stop/start, and even which way to go at
junctions. They have traffic lights which are interconnected with the
lights for other
In my mind there is a conceptual difference between formally defined
administrative areas and informal catchment areas. For the former, there
is (somewhere) a documented source of the truth, whereas there is no
official document to describe the delivery area of a pizza restaurant.
Religious
pOn 2012-12-03 20:27, Ole Nielsen wrote:/p
pgt; BTW, I'm not sure how useful the wet tag (old style or new
style) is./p
pIn France the speed limit on motorways is 130 when dry and 110
when wet. I don't know what the legal definition of wet is for these
purposes. I do know I would not like to
Hi Rob,
Am Sonntag, 25. November 2012, 23:40:04 schrieb Rob Nickerson:
In the UK I've spotted that some maximum weight road signs have just the
weight limit on the sign, whilst others also include a picture of a HGV.
I've only realised this difference recently and have not had time to
Take a look at the discussions on this page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:amenity%3Dschool
Min_age and max_age are already proposed there, as is the use of the UN
classifications (ISCED) for the level of education.
So I'm afraid I will be voting against your proposal; not
I think you mean maximum gross vehicle weight, not just gross vehicle
weight.
Maximum GVW is documented on the registration documents. The GVW itself is
the mass of the vehicle plus specified elements
Hi,
this is a minor follow-up proposal for Conditional Restrictions.
As the discussion has
Sorry, please ignore this, it was a random thought I was preparing and I
pressed the wrong button by accident.
I think you mean maximum gross vehicle weight, not just gross vehicle
weight.
Maximum GVW is documented on the registration documents. The GVW itself is
the mass of the vehicle plus
I wouldn't use boundary=admin with admin_level unless there is actually a
hierarchical relationship with the levels above/below. Otherwise they
should really be in their own hierarchy, using something like
boundary=fire_service. AIUI the US fire departments are at the city or
county level. Can a
Using only exit_to there is no way to handle junction topologies other
than a straightforward highway exit, where there is one big through road
and one small road leaving. What about wrong-side exits? Or where the
highway splits into two (or more) roads of equal importance?
Destination tagging is
As a sidenote there seems to be suggestions for maize and corn,
which, if I interpret this right, are the same plant, the first being
BE and the second AE? (As we generally use BE, maybe if what I suppose
is true we should mark corn as deprecated?)
From wikipedia
Johan, I agree with your statement that destination is much more
universal than exit_to. I would prefer to see destination brought
into wider use and exit_to deprecated. I only use destination, which
I use very frequently to help make routing instructions (not: routing
calculations - these
Phil, there's a difference between routing calculation (which neither
knows nor cares about road names, numbers, signposts etc) and how the
result of the calculation is presented to the user. Then you need to
relate the nodes/edges in the routing graph back to the real world. The
value in this
On 18/11/2012 21:59, Philip Barnes wrote:
On Sun, 2012-11-18 at 21:26 +0100, Colin Smale wrote:
Phil, there's a difference between routing calculation (which neither
knows nor cares about road names, numbers, signposts etc) and how the
result of the calculation is presented to the user
On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 20:00 +, Malcolm Herring wrote:
On 12/11/2012 19:27, Jo wrote:
The dye added is not the common denominator. We need the British term
for the tax break status of it.
Two common terms in use are: marked diesel and agricultural diesel.
In the UK its usually called
Wouldn't the route code be better in a relation? I'm sure there will be
some bits of the network which are part of multiple routes.
Why include the word code in the tag name for CRS (and nr_route_code)
and not for TIPLOC and STANOX?
Colin
All,
I'm part of a group of people who are working to
2012/10/30 Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl:
There is also the
destination tag set which covers the ref as signposted, allowing the
ref=* to reflect the actual administrative ID.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination
If you mean by destination tag set the key destination:ref
* Andrew Errington erringt...@gmail.com [2012-10-24 14:49 +0900]:
I think it's incredibly relevant whether it's included on the sign. I
suspect that the vast majority of people who use maps with reference
numbers on them use those maps for navigation. I think such people would
primarily be
Hi Martin,
First and foremost, tags applied to an object should of course refer to
that object. I normally interpret the ref tag on a ROAD as the
reference ID of that ROAD as designated by the powers-that-be. Motorway
slip roads are (in my experience in UK/NL) administratively speaking an
extra
There's maybe a difference between the case of two lanes in the same
direction, and two lanes in opposite directions.
On 16/10/2012 11:44, Janko Mihelic' wrote:
I posted this picture the last time this came up. It shows that
dividing roads is silly in some situations, for example countryside
On 16/10/2012 17:45, Rob Nickerson wrote:
Hi Eckhart,
Your right, voting has come to an end for the Conditional Restrictions
proposal, which was approved. A statement was not made on this list as
Ole and I are working on how best to write the feature page so that
some of the concerns raised
I saw the choice between dest_ref and destination_ref and adopted
dest_ref for the simple reason that it's shorter. In my mkgmap styles I
allow for either, and recently added destination:ref to that list.
I'm not particularly bothered which one wins, but I'm always in favour
of a bit of
I would choose option b).
Even if all four lanes are one piece of carriageway, it is useful for
routing directions etc to be able to make a distinction between the left
and right parts of the road. Normal mortals are supposed to treat the
solid white lines as if they were a brick wall anyway,
I don't understand why emergency vehicles are so important in this
discussion. In the first place they have wide-ranging exemptions from
traffic rules, which (let's be honest) we are never going to tag in OSM.
Secondly they are never going to be relying on OSM data (or indeed any
normal
On 10/10/2012 21:53, Alexander wrote:
Hi,
I think the separation sign should be chosen by the render.
+1
Why not adding new tags like:
name:left=Mexico
name:right=USA
-1
This looks to me like blatant tagging for the renderer, i.e.
manipulating the tagging to produce an optically
On 04/09/2012 15:30, Phil! Gold wrote:
I fully agree that there's no way to set a global standard; it should be
left to the locals, who know the features best.
But how local is local? It's obvious that a single standard for the
whole world is not going to happen, but there has to be some level
I can't find any guidance or consistency in the data, so I thought I'd
let up a balloon here...
Should the name=* for a river include the word River? Is it
name=Thames or name=River Thames?
According to the wiki [1] we should only use Thames in this case. If
we consider River Thames to be
I live in hope that, one day, we might have documented defaults or
implied values per territory. Until that time, we may have to map both
the tangible artefact (solid line) and the implications for routing (no
u-turns etc.) separately. They are distinct concepts, related by the
rules of the
Isn't that what turn restrictions are for?
Colin
On 20/08/2012 13:10, Markus Lindholm wrote:
On 20 August 2012 12:57, Markus Lindholm markus.lindh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 August 2012 09:39, Elena ``of Valhalla'' elena.valha...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-08-19 at 14:09:18 +0200, Markus
As every track segment has a maximum speed, why not just apply the
existing maxspeed=* tag to the tracks? It is not clear to me whether
your intention with traffic=fast refers to some attribute of the track
itself, or the use to which it is put. Is it some official designation
(from Network
While we're at it, what's traffic=fast on a rail line? What other values
could there be? Weren't we using service=* for this kind of thing?
Colin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On 03/08/2012 13:36, Martin Vonwald wrote:
To cut a long story short: landcover=herbs would also be fine, IF we
would expect that those tag will be often used and the difference to
landcover=grass is substantial enough. As I doubt that I would
recommend landcover=grass and grass=herbs.
Grass is
On 03/07/2012 13:29, Janko Mihelić wrote:
I think no_left_turn is the best solution. The line on the middle of
the street is not a u-turn indicator, it is an overtake indicator
which can be tagged with overtaking=no and overtaking=both.
Are you sure that the dotted overtake line allows you to
Strictly speaking the international E-numbers are routes, not roads. The
European Route Network is overlaid on top of the national networks and
doesn't bother about international boundaries. In Belgium however it is
very common to use the E-route numbers on signs instead of any local
A-number
Hull) to Esbjerg.
A well thought out route?
Phil
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 19/06/2012 11:46 Colin Smale wrote:
Strictly speaking the international E-numbers are routes, not roads. The
European Route Network is overlaid on top of the national networks and
doesn't bother about international
Hi Eckhart,
On 15/06/2012 01:08, Eckhart Wörner wrote:
Hi Colin,
Am Freitag, 15. Juni 2012, 00:24:18 schrieb Colin Smale:
If I were king I would be looking for a system that:
* makes common cases easy
Extended conditions: ☑
* makes complex cases possible
Extended conditions: ☑
* makes
Tobias, thanks for your constructive response.
On 14/06/2012 03:22, Tobias Knerr wrote:
On 13.06.2012 23:48, Colin Smale wrote:
Taking the access discussion to a higher
level of abstraction, and without abandoning the key-value pair
paradigm, I believe we are looking for a way of giving a tag
On 14/06/2012 11:19, Pieren wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Back to my idea to move all 'variables' to the value :
Let say we create a new access keyword : condition (or
access_condition, cond, expr or whatever_you_like) suffixed by
a number, eg
On 14/06/2012 12:53, Flaimo wrote:
this notation has the same flaw as the current access scheme. it mixes
transportation modes and user roles. motor_vehicle is a
transportation mode. agricultural is a user role. not everywhere on
this planet agricultural automatically means motor_vehicle. that
On 14/06/2012 13:00, Tobias Knerr wrote:
On 14.06.2012 08:38, Colin Smale wrote:
My concern with this is that it may become unwieldy and cumbersome with
anything beyond fairly trivial cases such as your maxspeed example.
For me, the goal is to make the common cases *easy*, and the rare
complex
Martin, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then it had
better be a duck... What I mean with this, is if the grammar is so
English-like such that people are tempted to use constructions which are
not (or not quite) supported by the grammar, or if the way it works is
contrary to how
For some reason everyone seems determined to come up with the most
complex system imaginable, instead of taking successful ideas from the
rest of the world. This trait is what causes many projects to fail.
Let's not look at this as simply a discussion about access tags, but
an opportunity to
On 13/06/2012 18:23, Eckhart Wörner wrote:
Hi Colin,
Am Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2012, 18:11:53 schrieb Colin Smale:
For some reason everyone seems determined to come up with the most
complex system imaginable, instead of taking successful ideas from the
rest of the world. This trait is what causes
On 06/06/2012 09:13, Martin Vonwald wrote:
If you want to specify the dimension of the mini-roundabout I think it
would be sufficient to specify the width of the approaching roads.
Martin
How about diameter=15 on the mini-roundabout node? This is factually
correct, verifiable on the ground
When a UK sign says unsuitable for motor vehicles or unsuitable for
HGVs it means discouraged in your terms. There is no guarantee that
you *will* get into problems, but it is just a strong warning. A road
that becomes a muddy track might present a problem for a normal car, but
a trial bike or
On 01/06/2012 14:19, Jason Cunningham wrote:
On 1 June 2012 08:09, Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com
mailto:imagic@gmail.com wrote:
But we have to make sure, that this values are only applied if real
indications (e.g. signposts) are present and not e.g. if one just
thinks
I'd like to get some input about tagging golf courses as navigation targets.
I found a detailed page describing the tagging for the actual sporting
areas (tees, greens etc) but no clear pointers about how to tag things
to get you to the course in the first place. The club house building is
501 - 600 of 658 matches
Mail list logo
