Re: [Tagging] Ski_jump_take_off

2014-03-18 Thread yvecai
All talk and no action :) Remontees, do you want to make a nice proposal page ? Yves On 01/23/2014 10:51 PM, Tod Fitch wrote: On Jan 23, 2014, at 12:35 PM, yvecai wrote: I've checked the 8 piste:type=ski_jump mapped and a part one that is obscured by cloud, the others are what they are: the p

Re: [Tagging] Ski_jump_take_off

2014-01-23 Thread Tod Fitch
On Jan 23, 2014, at 12:35 PM, yvecai wrote: > I've checked the 8 piste:type=ski_jump mapped and a part one that is obscured > by cloud, the others are what they are: the piste on the on the ski jump > facility (I even forgot I mapped some myself from Bing). I was afraid this > tag would be alre

Re: [Tagging] Ski_jump_take_off

2014-01-23 Thread yvecai
I've checked the 8 piste:type=ski_jump mapped and a part one that is obscured by cloud, the others are what they are: the piste on the on the ski jump facility (I even forgot I mapped some myself from Bing). I was afraid this tag would be already used by freestyle jumps. So I propose: * piste

Re: [Tagging] Ski_jump_take_off

2014-01-23 Thread remont...@free.fr
I agree with the idea of ski_jump is not a sport. +1 Tobias 2014/1/23 Richard Z. > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 01:33:41PM +0100, Janko Mihelić wrote: > > 2014/1/23 Richard Z. > > > > > * sport=* is used for something different. His intention was to > describe > > > the > > > details of a technic

Re: [Tagging] Ski_jump_take_off

2014-01-23 Thread remont...@free.fr
Is there more type of ski_jumps, because you purpose ski_jump! 2014/1/23 Janko Mihelić > 2014/1/23 Richard Z. > >> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:31:51PM +0100, Janko Mihelić wrote: >> > > leisure=ski_jumping_hill (over the whole area) >> > ski_jump=take_off (or maybe better, ski_jump=in-run) >> >

Re: [Tagging] Ski_jump_take_off

2014-01-23 Thread Janko Mihelić
2014/1/23 Richard Z. > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:31:51PM +0100, Janko Mihelić wrote: > > leisure=ski_jumping_hill (over the whole area) > > ski_jump=take_off (or maybe better, ski_jump=in-run) > > ski_jump=landing > > ski_jump=construction_point > > ski_jump=judges_tower > > I like this proposal

Re: [Tagging] Ski_jump_take_off

2014-01-23 Thread Richard Z.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:31:51PM +0100, Janko Mihelić wrote: > We should try to unify tagging of various sport objects as much as > possible. Golf courses are tagged like this: > leisure=ski_jumping_hill (over the whole area) > ski_jump=take_off (or maybe better, ski_jump=in-run) > ski_jump=lan

Re: [Tagging] Ski_jump_take_off

2014-01-23 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014/1/23 Tobias Knerr > If he wants to tag these things as leisure=ski_jumping_take_off and > omit the sport key entirely, that's fine with me. > I mostly agree with Tobias here, leisure seems a better key for the facility, but maybe the value should be different. "take_off" sounds like a spot

Re: [Tagging] Ski_jump_take_off

2014-01-23 Thread Tobias Knerr
On 23.01.2014 12:53, Richard Z. wrote: > -1 > > * sport=* is used for something different. His intention was to describe the > details of a technical structure, not to say what kind of sport facility it > is. > Would you map ski-pistest with sport=*? How? The sport=* tag is non-physical. I

Re: [Tagging] Ski_jump_take_off

2014-01-23 Thread Richard Z.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 01:33:41PM +0100, Janko Mihelić wrote: > 2014/1/23 Richard Z. > > > * sport=* is used for something different. His intention was to describe > > the > > details of a technical structure, not to say what kind of sport facility > > it is. > > Would you map ski-pistest wi

Re: [Tagging] Ski_jump_take_off

2014-01-23 Thread Janko Mihelić
2014/1/23 Richard Z. > * sport=* is used for something different. His intention was to describe > the > details of a technical structure, not to say what kind of sport facility > it is. > Would you map ski-pistest with sport=*? How? > * 97 is a high percentage ski jump sites that were mapped.

Re: [Tagging] Ski_jump_take_off

2014-01-23 Thread Richard Z.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:04:38PM +0100, Tobias Knerr wrote: > On 22.01.2014 21:52, yvecai wrote: > > 97 sport=ski_jump_take_off, given the number off such facilities in the > > world can be considered as a massive use of the tag. Should we really > > change the key even if leisure, man_made or pi

Re: [Tagging] Ski_jump_take_off

2014-01-22 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014/1/22 Tobias Knerr > Yes, we should change it. This value would re-define the sport=* key, > and 97 uses are not enough to re-define a key with 645415 uses. > +1 cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.open

Re: [Tagging] Ski_jump_take_off

2014-01-22 Thread Tobias Knerr
On 22.01.2014 21:52, yvecai wrote: > 97 sport=ski_jump_take_off, given the number off such facilities in the > world can be considered as a massive use of the tag. Should we really > change the key even if leisure, man_made or piste:type would seems more > appropriate ? Yes, we should change it. T

Re: [Tagging] Ski_jump_take_off

2014-01-22 Thread yvecai
According to taginfo: 97sportski_jump_take_off 21historicski_jump_take_off 19nameOlympic Cross-Country / Ski Jump Loop 18piste:typeski_jump 7buildingski_jump 6sportski_jump 6sportski_jump_landing 97 sport=ski_jump_take_off, given the number

Re: [Tagging] Ski_jump_take_off

2014-01-22 Thread remont...@free.fr
Why create a specific tag like ski_jump ? Have we got others tags who are more adapted ? 2014/1/21 Janko Mihelić > We should try to unify tagging of various sport objects as much as > possible. Golf courses are tagged like this: > > leisure=golf_course > golf=green > golf=bunker > > so I sugges

Re: [Tagging] Ski_jump_take_off

2014-01-21 Thread Yves
What about piste:type= tag common to winter sports ? Yves Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit : > > >> Am 21/gen/2014 um 19:04 schrieb "remont...@free.fr" >: >> >> I like sport=ski_jump_take_off. Do you think it is a good idea? > > >it is not IMHO, consider putting it into the leisure key, sport is use

Re: [Tagging] Ski_jump_take_off

2014-01-21 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
> Am 21/gen/2014 um 19:04 schrieb "remont...@free.fr" : > > I like sport=ski_jump_take_off. Do you think it is a good idea? it is not IMHO, consider putting it into the leisure key, sport is used for types of sport (attribute) rather than physical objects cheers, Martin _

Re: [Tagging] Ski_jump_take_off

2014-01-21 Thread Steve Doerr
On 21/01/2014 18:04, remont...@free.fr wrote: Hello, I want you to think about a normalized tag about ski jump take_off (tremplins de saut à ski en français). I like sport=ski_jump_take_off. Do you think it is a good idea? Can I document it in the wiki ? The OED has 'ski-jump n. (a) the a

Re: [Tagging] Ski_jump_take_off

2014-01-21 Thread Janko Mihelić
We should try to unify tagging of various sport objects as much as possible. Golf courses are tagged like this: leisure=golf_course golf=green golf=bunker so I suggest: leisure=ski_jumping_hill (over the whole area) ski_jump=take_off (or maybe better, ski_jump=in-run) ski_jump=landing ski_jump=c

Re: [Tagging] Ski_jump_take_off

2014-01-21 Thread Tobias Knerr
Am 21.01.2014 19:04, schrieb remont...@free.fr: > I want you to think about a normalized tag about ski jump take_off > (tremplins de saut à ski en français). I like > sport=ski_jump_take_off. Do you think it is a good idea? Can I > document it in the wiki ? The sport key should be used to define

[Tagging] Ski_jump_take_off

2014-01-21 Thread remont...@free.fr
Hello, I want you to think about a normalized tag about ski jump take_off (tremplins de saut à ski en français). I like sport=ski_jump_take_off. Do you think it is a good idea? Can I document it in the wiki ? Good bye! PS : Please reply me remont...@free.fr because I didn't suscribed to the list