Am 30.05.2014 18:32, schrieb Nelson A. de Oliveira:
(Please, don't make a voodoo doll of me because I am bringing this
discussion back.)
We had a long discussion in
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2014-April/017247.html
and now I saw in the English wiki
On 2014-06-01 21:17, Nelson A. de
Oliveira wrote :
Can't the wiki page be protected?
Would you do the updates, corrections and translation?
I think it should just be mandatory to prepare/publish any
substantial change on the sister mailing list.
High,
During the discussion of this tag, it was said that a sure culprit for
incorrect noexit=yes tags, is a misleading phrasing
Use the noexit=yes tag at the end of a highway
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway=* to indicate that
there is no possibility to travel further by any
Can't the wiki page be protected?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Hi André,
Am 01.06.2014 20:49, schrieb André Pirard:
High,
During the discussion of this tag, it was said that a sure culprit for
incorrect noexit=yes tags, is a misleading phrasing
Use the noexit=yes tag at the end of a highway
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway=* to indicate
All arguments are on the table. Nothing new here but a recent change in the
wiki removed what was accepted as a compromise in april.
There is not conceptual mistake to say it's a cul-de-sac on the node or on
the way. Providing the information to QA tools or other contributors on the
last way or on
I had never tagged a noexit=yes, neither node=yes nor way=yes, but I find it
sensible to declare it as false positive in QA tools.
Agree that the tag is less meaningful on ways.
Yves
On 31 mai 2014 06:51:59 UTC+02:00, bulwersator bulwersa...@zoho.com wrote:
noexit=yes on ways makes absolutely no
Sorry, I may have missed part of this endless discussion.
But how do I tag a dead-end sign on a road
(e.g. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zeichen_357.svg).
These signs exist in various forms in various countries, and they are
placed at the beginning of the road or stretch of roads which
Am 31/mag/2014 um 10:06 schrieb Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com:
But how do I tag a dead-end sign on a road
(e.g. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zeichen_357.svg).
you'd tag it best on a node with traffic_sign=* (e.g. dead_end)
cheers,
This is not so obvious, because it has to be directional (for the router).
If you start your route in such a dead-end street you never get out, if
it's not directional.
The noexit=yes on the way to me seems much simpler and intuitive.
(I used the tag initially in this way, when I started with OSM.
What does the router have to do with the traffic sign? What information
does it get from it that can not be easier got from the topology?
André
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com wrote:
This is not so obvious, because it has to be directional (for the router).
Am 5/31/14 12:46 , schrieb Volker Schmidt:
This is not so obvious, because it has to be directional (for the router).
If you start your route in such a dead-end street you never get out, if
it's not directional.
The noexit=yes on the way to me seems much simpler and intuitive.
(I used the tag
Any decent router will totally ignore a noexit=yes tag as it determines the
topology from the actual ways and how they are connected.
The noexit=yes tag serves only one purpose and has two different data
consumers: the next human mapper that comes along and automated QA tools. It
allows those
Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
(Please, don't make a voodoo doll of me because I am bringing this
discussion back.)
Too late! :)
We had a long discussion in
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2014-April/017247.html
and now I saw in the English wiki
I'd also recommend adding the page to your watchlist.
Unfortunately, the wiki has no moderation, so edit wars are really possible.
On May 30, 2014 1:48 PM, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
(Please, don't make a voodoo doll of me because I am bringing
On 2014-05-30 18:47, SomeoneElse wrote
:
We had a long discussion in
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2014-April/017247.html
and now I saw in the English wiki
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:noexit
noexit=yes on ways makes absolutely no sense and mentioning this tagging style
on wiki suggests otherwise.
On Fri, 30 May 2014 17:16:29 -0700 André Pirard
lt;a.pirard.pa...@gmail.comgt; wrote
On 2014-05-30 18:47, SomeoneElse wrote :
5388b60f.9080...@mail.atownsend.org.uk
Am 13.04.2014 22:36, schrieb Mike N:
On 4/13/2014 4:21 PM, Pieren wrote:
It's just a long and onerous discussion to find dubious arguments
against this tag on ways.
It's really an argument against needless clutter in the Wiki. Why not
add noexit to a relation to show some condition? To
Hi,
Side note: Please note that I just found two versions of the "Use
the noexit=yes tag..." text. One ahead that says that it must be
used only on nodes and the former one inside that says that it can
be used on ways too. I left the newcomer where it was: ahead
Am 14.04.2014 14:07, schrieb André Pirard:
Hi,
Side note: Please note that I just found two versions of the Use the
noexit=yes tag... text. One ahead that says that it must be used only
on nodes and the former one inside that says that it can be used on ways
too. I left the newcomer where
Am 12.04.2014 20:52, schrieb Nelson A. de Oliveira:
So the wiki will stay allowing and saying to use noexit on ways too,
even if the majority agree that it shouldn't be like this?
The german page will exclude ways and all other communities can discuss
this issue on
that we have to prove to any government that we are
trying to put right something that is hardly a problem. In fact,
spending brainpower and time on such a trivial issue would be quite a
misallocation of resources.
Now what about some more fun? Flood tagging noexit=no in the middle of
every street
our data right.
I don't think that we have to prove to any government that we are
trying to put right something that is hardly a problem. In fact,
spending brainpower and time on such a trivial issue would be quite a
misallocation of resources.
Now what about some more fun? Flood tagging
So the wiki will stay allowing and saying to use noexit on ways too,
even if the majority agree that it shouldn't be like this?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:08 PM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.comwrote:
What, in tagging a way, indicates on which end of it is the dead end? (I
asked that already).
omg, all ends (last node) not connected to another highway are surely
dead ends when the tag is present :-))
(and the
Am 11/apr/2014 um 17:14 schrieb Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com:
This thread is unbelievable.
+1. ;-)
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Just a quick comment:
If it's not useful to use it on ways, then I don't think we should
recommend it on nodes *or ways* on the wiki page (as it is currently).
In fact, we should recommend against putting on ways.
2014-04-09 16:16 GMT-03:00 André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com:
On
Yes, I agree.
That recommendation was introduced yesterday by Pieren [1]. I strongly
oppose that.
The wiki is not for documenting Tagging-trends, but for documenting best
practices. And I would say, that tagging noexit=yes on ways is not a
best practice.
In my opinion an acceptable comment
On 10.04.2014 14:51, John Packer wrote:
Just a quick comment:
If it's not useful to use it on ways, then I don't think we should
recommend it on nodes /or ways/ on the wiki page (as it is currently).
In fact, we should recommend against putting on ways.
Well, there is one person against wiki
I removed the use on ways from the wiki page.
The wiki is not for documenting Tagging-trends, but for documenting best
practices.
I agree 100% with this.
I also added the following phrase to the Usage section:
In the past this tag was used on ways very often, but because tagging on
ways has
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:48 PM, John Packer john.pack...@gmail.com wrote:
I also added the following phrase to the Usage section:
In the past this tag was used on ways very often, but because tagging on
ways has several disadvantages, you should rather tag noexit=yes on nodes.
I cannot
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:10 PM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Well, there is one person against wiki fiddling and in favour of using
it on ways, who simply does change the just corrected version without
further discussion.
Well, consider that I'm speaking in the name of the
Am 10.04.2014 15:48, schrieb John Packer:
I removed the use on ways from the wiki page.
The wiki is not for documenting Tagging-trends, but for
documenting best practices.
I agree 100% with this.
I also added the following phrase to the Usage section:
In the past this tag was
Am 10.04.2014 15:54, schrieb Pieren:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:10 PM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Well, there is one person against wiki fiddling and in favour of using
it on ways, who simply does change the just corrected version without
further discussion.
Well, consider that I'm
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Florian Schäfer flor...@schaeferban.de wrote:
True, in the most cases it is not important. But sometimes it is, for
example in my T-deadend example, mentioned on this ML.
All cases can be covered by the tagging on nodes. The tagging on ways can't
cover all
would say, that tagging
noexit=yes on ways is not a best practice.
In my opinion an acceptable comment in the Wiki about tagging
noexit=yes on ways would be "In the past this tag was used on ways
very often (~40%). But because this tagging has several
disadvantages
I guess the problem arises from tagging dead-ends in a geo database.
QA tools should keep there false positives for themself, not in OSM, don't you
think?
On 10 avril 2014 16:59:44 UTC+02:00, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Florian Schäfer
flor...@schaeferban.de
On 4/10/2014 12:10 PM, Yves wrote:
I guess the problem arises from tagging dead-ends in a geo database.
QA tools should keep there false positives for themself, not in OSM,
don't you think?
Except that I don't use QA tools when editing data. But often as I
create something that ends
On 4/10/2014 10:59 AM, Pieren wrote:
But we don't have problems with the tag on the way ! It's true that
the wiki has to document the best practices but it should not fordid
practices that are not wrong, harmfull, unclear or ambiguous ! I
regret the time when people worked with a more open mind
I agree with André Pirard that:
1. If we say it should be tagged on the way, it should be clearer how it
should be tagged (what if the cul-de-sac is splitted, etc)
2. noexit was a bad choice of name for this key
Personally I don't know if using noexit=yes on ways is used by any software
nowadays.
On 2014-04-10 16:59, Pieren wrote :
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Florian Schäfer flor...@schaeferban.de
wrote:
True, in the most cases it is not important. But sometimes it is, for
example in my T-deadend example, mentioned on this ML.
All cases can be covered by the tagging on nodes.
Am 10.04.2014 16:59, schrieb Pieren:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Florian Schäfer flor...@schaeferban.de wrote:
True, in the most cases it is not important. But sometimes it is, for
example in my T-deadend example, mentioned on this ML.
All cases can be covered by the tagging on nodes. The
Am 10.04.2014 16:01, schrieb Pieren:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:48 PM, John Packer john.pack...@gmail.com wrote:
I also added the following phrase to the Usage section:
In the past this tag was used on ways very often, but because tagging on
ways has several disadvantages, you should rather
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:38 PM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.comwrote:
1. noexit cannot be used on ways because that does not show what end
cannot pass
eeh, what what end ? Either the highway line is linked to another highway
at both ends, then noexit is a tagging mistake. Or the
2014-04-09 10:47 GMT+02:00 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:38 PM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.comwrote:
1. noexit cannot be used on ways because that does not show what end
cannot pass
eeh, what what end ? Either the highway line is linked to another
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Ronnie Soak
chaoschaos0...@googlemail.com wrote:
There can be a way that IS connected on both ends and still is a dead end. A
road can end in a wall or a fence, where on the other side the road
continues.
There may be other tags there (barrier=*), but still it
There can be a way that IS connected on both ends and still is a dead
end. A
road can end in a wall or a fence, where on the other side the road
continues.
There may be other tags there (barrier=*), but still it would be hard to
quickly spot the dead end side with noexit=yes tagged only
On 4/9/14 8:51 AM, Ronnie Soak wrote:
As a means to communicate an intention from one mapper to the next, it
simply is more clear when mapped on the node than on the way. I simply
gave an example where the end of the dead-end way can not simply be
deduced by its geometry. Regards, chaos
i
On 9 April 2014 14:05, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
what makes no_exit so special that it needs its own key
for this purpose?
Roads that are close to each other but not connected are a common tagging
mistake. The tag no_exit is a default, which we generally don't tag, but I
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
what makes no_exit so special that it needs its own key
for this purpose?
Once more, it's only useful for QA tools checking highway
intersections geometry where one of the highway is nearby but not
connected. The
Am 09.04.2014 14:51, schrieb Ronnie Soak:
There can be a way that IS connected on both ends and still is a
dead end. A
road can end in a wall or a fence, where on the other side the road
continues.
There may be other tags there (barrier=*), but still it would be
On 4/9/14 9:13 AM, Pieren wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
what makes no_exit so special that it needs its own key
for this purpose?
Once more, it's only useful for QA tools checking highway
intersections geometry where one of the highway is
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
but when do you remove the no_exit, or do you leave it forever for
the validators? the DB developer in me doesn't like redundant
information, all it does is create confusion if the data is in
conflict.
It's only
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Florian Schäfer flor...@schaeferban.de wrote:
An example where the tagging of noexit on ways is not sufficient is a
T-shaped deadend, where the crossbar is one OSM-way. At one end pedestrians
can pass, at the other end not.
Again, the noexit is only important
Am 09.04.2014 16:04, schrieb Pieren:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Florian Schäfer flor...@schaeferban.de wrote:
An example where the tagging of noexit on ways is not sufficient is a
T-shaped deadend, where the crossbar is one OSM-way. At one end pedestrians
can pass, at the other end not.
On 2014-04-09 10:47, Pieren wrote :
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:38 PM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
1. noexit cannot be used on ways because that does not show what
end cannot pass
eeh, what what end ? Either the highway line is
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 3:48 AM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
noexit=yes has nothing in common with the traffic_sign as:
1. it only is about motorized traffic where noexit=yes is about every
travel mode.
2. it is used at the beginning of a cul-de-sac and an information for
driver of
On 08.04.2014 12:10, Pieren wrote:
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 3:48 AM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
noexit=yes has nothing in common with the traffic_sign as:
1. it only is about motorized traffic where noexit=yes is about every
travel mode.
2. it is used at the beginning of a
I tagged noexit=yes on the ways.
Why ? If I remember correctly some more experienced mapper told me it was
ok to do so.
And perhaps I read the wiki page before June 28, 2011, when there was
nothing mentioned about way or node.
You cannot assume each mapper reads all wiki pages every week or
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:57 PM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
The major points in my view are:
* We do not need to tag cul-de-sac as defined by the traffic_sign. This
information is available through geometry and/or access tags.
This is not related with tagging on the last node or
On 2014-04-04 17:35, Pieren wrote :
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
If it is accepted, I gonna hange the wiki accordingly and gonna ask a
for validator checks in JOSM, as we
On Apr 8, 2014, at 3:10 AM, Pieren wrote:
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 3:48 AM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Please, return to earth. Tagging traffic signs is just a funny
activity in fully mapped areas. How do you specify a speed limit in
OSM ? with a traffic_sign tag on a node or
Hi,
A problem raised in 2013-12 on talk-be regarding the error with sign F45
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Road_signs_in_Belgium#F45 that
nobody corrected.
I finally did it.
I had brought the subject to Tagging and it reached a consensus with
Georg's message which I quote below. But nobody
now make sure that all QA-tools and editors/validators follow those rules.
I fear that otherwise we will keep seeing noexit tags that are used
incorrectly.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:38 PM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
A problem raised in 2013-12 on talk-be regarding the
If you don't use noexit=yes on ways, what do you use it on? I don't see that
it would be meaningful on nodes, areas, or relations.
On April 4, 2014 9:14:24 AM CDT, Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On
On 2014-04-06 00:07, John F. Eldredge
wrote :
If you don't use noexit=yes on ways, what do you use it on?
How do you understand "Use the noexit=yes tag on the node
at the end of a highway=* ..."?
If you read the wiki page very very carefully, you
I think the Wiki is abundantly clear on the usage of this tag.
I says, among other things, that it is to be used on a node, not on a way,
and that
This tag is mainly useful where a road or path ends close to another way
but where it isn't possible to get through due to a barrier or other
Well, at least on my part, the confusion was because I was thinking in terms of
the no exit sign, which is always posted at the entrance to a cul-de-sac, not
at the end of it.
On April 5, 2014 8:00:27 PM CDT, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the Wiki is abundantly clear
On 06.04.2014 03:13, John F. Eldredge wrote:
Well, at least on my part, the confusion was because I was thinking in terms
of the no exit sign, which is always posted at the entrance to a cul-de-sac,
not at the end of it.
Do we need a link to traffic_sign=* ?
noexit=yes has nothing in common
On 03.04.2014 21:22, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:17 PM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Is noexit=yes useful on ways ?
The way has one side that has/is an exit :-)
Tagging the whole way as noexit=yes seems strange.
If it is accepted, I gonna hange the wiki
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 03.04.2014 21:22, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:17 PM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Is noexit=yes useful on ways ?
The way has one side that has/is an exit :-)
Tagging the whole way as
Hi,
Following a long dated thread, dormant draft here, what is said in the
wiki article and now clarified...
We now agree, Georg.
It seems that this tag is one of the most understood one, and I have
modified the wiki with a warning ahead so that the reader read more that
the first phrase and a
On 2014-04-04 16:14, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote :
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 03.04.2014 21:22, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:17 PM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Is noexit=yes useful on ways ?
The way has one side
I also can't see why, but people also use noexit=no
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/noexit#values
noexit=no is the same as fixme=continue
I believe fixme=continue should be favored since it actually appears in QA
Tools and in JOSM
2014-04-04 11:56 GMT-03:00 André Pirard
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
If it is accepted, I gonna hange the wiki accordingly and gonna ask a
for validator checks in JOSM, as we have more than 100,000 ways with
this
On 04.04.2014 17:35, Pieren wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
If it is accepted, I gonna hange the wiki accordingly and gonna ask a
for validator checks in JOSM, as we
On 03.12.2013 17:08, Jo wrote:
Or possibly somebody changed the meaning of the tag on the wiki, without
telling dinosaurs like myself. At first it was a tag that went on ways
which are a dead end for cars.
The wiki history tells a different story.
It got an icon in JOSM when put on nodes
I was thinking the same thing, but couldn't put it into words properly. If
40% of noexit tags are on ways, this is meaningful, not some sort of
accident. FWIW I also prefer to put the tag on the way, I don't care about
the gratification that it gets rendered with a nifty icon in JOSM when put
on a
OK, I didn't check. Maybe I consulted the wiki at the wrong point in time
and got it wrong for the past 6 years.
Polyglot
2014-04-04 17:53 GMT+02:00 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
On 03.12.2013 17:08, Jo wrote:
Or possibly somebody changed the meaning of the tag on the wiki, without
On 2014-04-04 17:35, Pieren wrote :
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
If it is accepted, I gonna hange the wiki accordingly and gonna ask a
for validator checks in JOSM, as we
I always thought the meaning of noexit=yes was very clear. Obviously there
is some confusion I was not aware of. If a highway ends with no way to
continue, the final node is tagged with noexit=yes. I only use it if I am
sure there is no way forward from the end of the particular way. As someone
ATM on the german mailing list noexit=yes is discussed.
On user pointed out that on the english wiki page it is defined for
nodes and ways where as on the german one it is only valid for nodes.
I had a look at the history of the page and found some actions 3 years
ago. First it was only defined
ATM on the german mailing list noexit=yes is discussed.
On user pointed out that on the english wiki page it is defined for
nodes and ways where as on the german one it is only valid for nodes.
I had a look at the history of the page and found some actions 3 years
ago. First it was only defined
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:17 PM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Is noexit=yes useful on ways ?
The way has one side that has/is an exit :-)
Tagging the whole way as noexit=yes seems strange.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
fly wrote:
Is noexit=yes useful on ways ?
Asking a slightly broader question, in what situations is noexit=yes
useful at all, except as a cue to subsequent mappers in the very rare
situation that one way ends very close to another one and there's
absolutely nothing (not a wall, footpath,
in what situations is noexit=yes useful at all, except as a cue to
subsequent mappers in the very rare situation that one way ends very close
to another one and there's absolutely nothing (not a wall, footpath,
anything) between them?
It might be useful when there is limited visibility of the
On 03.04.2014 21:30, John Packer wrote:
in what situations is noexit=yes useful at all, except as a cue to
subsequent mappers in the very rare situation that one way ends very
close to another one and there's absolutely nothing (not a wall,
footpath, anything) between them?
Am 03/apr/2014 um 21:22 schrieb SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk:
and there's absolutely nothing (not a wall, footpath, anything) between them?
you could still map that as natural=void ;-)
Seriously, there will always be something (guard rail, ditch, scrub, grass,
fence, gate,
Hello,
Am 03.04.2014 21:22, schrieb SomeoneElse:
fly wrote:
Is noexit=yes useful on ways ?
Asking a slightly broader question, in what situations is noexit=yes
useful at all, except as a cue to subsequent mappers in the very rare
situation that one way ends very close to another one and
Hi,
noexit http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:noexit=yes, apparently
corresponding to this dead end signal,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Road_signs_in_Belgium#F45 is said
to be used at the end of a highway
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway=* to indicate that
there no
On 12/3/2013 8:48 AM, André Pirard wrote:
I doubt very much that this tags helps anybody or any quality-check
program to understand anything. A note should suffice, and I think the
best option would be to remove that confusing tag.
It is a signal to quality checking programs such as KeepRight.
Am 03/dic/2013 um 14:48 schrieb André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com:
noexit=yes, apparently corresponding to this dead end signal, is said to be
used at the end of a highway=* to indicate that there no possibility to
travel further by any transport mode
this is a hint for the mapper
Am 03.12.2013 14:48, schrieb André Pirard:
I agree to:
This tag is
- not necessary for routing
- senseless on ways
- only useful on nodes (the last one, where no other way is connected)
The wiki should be changed, especially the use on ways should be removed.
But I do not agree to
I
Or possibly somebody changed the meaning of the tag on the wiki, without
telling dinosaurs like myself. At first it was a tag that went on ways
which are a dead end for cars. It got an icon in JOSM when put on nodes and
people started using it on end nodes.
Op 3 dec. 2013 15:28 schreef Mike N
94 matches
Mail list logo
