=platform instead
of aerialway=station! (That's crazy):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Aaerialway%3Dstation&type=revision&diff=1529291&oldid=1412174
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 4/10/20, Gegorian Hauser via Tagging wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible, t
> Currently there are two ways to tag a conservation area:
> boundary=national_park
> or
> boundary=protected_area + protect_class=1 to 7
There is also a third tag: leisure=nature_reserve, which is even more
common, and traditionally has been used for natural conservation areas
which are not Natio
me, is it the name of the hedge or the
name of the school? A human can easily pick the right answer, but
computers are not so good at this.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 4/6/20, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Am Mo., 6. Apr. 2020 um 14:00 Uhr schrieb Kevin Kenny <
> kevin.b.ke...@gmail.c
protected_area_categories
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 4/6/20, Kevin Kenny wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 6:37 AM Andrew Davidson wrote:
>>
>> On 6/4/20 9:23 am, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
>> > The only thing that the proposal page still needs is a couple more
>> > det
Andrew, would you please repeat this analysis with all features tagged
"protect_class=2" which have a wikidata tag?
I suspect that many of those will not match according to Wikidata.
On 4/6/20, Andrew Davidson wrote:
> On 6/4/20 9:23 am, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
>> The
we still proposed
> the secondary tags refugee_site:XX=XX (for instance
> refugee_site:status=formal)?
Yes.
> Do we also have to add “refugee_site=yes” or it’s not necessary?
No, if the tag is "amenity=refugee_site", there is no need to add it.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 4/6/20, Mano
.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
c and amenity=doctors and amenity=dentist, but what
other pages will be affected?
Can someone confirm if "urgent_care" makes sense in British English,
rather than "walk-in" or something else?
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 4/6/20, Ty Stockman wrote:
> https://wiki.openstreetma
ed to avoid confusion and more precisely
tag these features. The value "motorcycle_taxi" is not a very common
term in British (or American) English, but that's because these
features are not found in Europe or North America.
I would like to bring this to a vote soon.
-- Joseph Eisenb
ss=",
like "protection_class=recreation" instead of "21"
-- Joseph Eisenberg
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
t; refugee_site:population = 500,000
> refugee_site:structure=shelters/tents/multifunctional/mixed
> refugee_site:status=formal/informal
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Stuart
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 at 02:48, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you for being
site, which
includes non-residential features, as landuse=residential only.
On 4/4/20, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> Thank you for being willing to work on this and listen to suggestions
> from the community.
>
> I agree that, under the current, very broad definition of
> "amenity=s
reference would be for amenity=refugee_site, to fit with
amenity=social_facility and similar area features. The key "amenity"
is used for a very wide variety of features, and it's the best option
for an area feature that does not fit into a more specific category.)
-- Joseph Eisenberg
(See
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Sjp)
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 4/3/20, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 21:16, Marc M. wrote:
>
>> the first page does not show any sign suggesting that
>> it is also a pedestrian area
>> imho "It could be" is not eno
ap playgrounds and their equipment in
situations where a playground just has one equipment and this
equipment fills up the whole area of the playground.
Mappers can tag "leisure=playground" + "playground=structure" on the
same node or area in this case, right?
-- Joseph Eisenb
ong as they are sort of part of the same
logical larger place."
In that case use a place=neighbourhood node, since this is a named
part of a larger settlement, aka "a neighbo(u)rhood"
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/28/20, Clifford Snow wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 5:23 PM Paul Al
that tower:type=crossing (where a power line
crosses a river or canyon) should be replaced by height=* + designe=*
where "A support is significantly higher and stronger to allow a line
to cross an obstacle like rivers"
Are you proposing any new values of "design=*" for this, or
going to
> decide that the “duplicates” are undesirable and remove them. And, if
> followed there are fairly common cases where it still is not possible to
> determine the language.
>
> 2. Create a scheme where a default language can be set on boundaries as has
> been suggested b
reetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Default_Language_Format
Unfortunately that was not approved. It's a confusing topic, many of
the people who opposed the proposal seemed to think it would do
something else.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/26/20, Tod Fitch wrote:
>
>
>> On Mar 25, 2020,
ng that does not conflict with
place=village/town.
Also, is there already an Import page set up by CartONG for the
proposal to import this info from the UNHCR database?
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/25/20, Manon Viou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The proposed feature place=refugee_site to provide
alse by local mappers.
If an Indonesian mapper adds name:id=* tags to every village in
northern Finland, how is anyone to confirm that they are right or
wrong?
-- Joseph EIsenberg
On 3/25/20, Jyri-Petteri Paloposki wrote:
> On 25.3.2020 12.58, Christoph Hormann wrote:
>> In terms of ou
> ...the centre of Paris in a Nolliplan: http://www.iad
> bs.de/site/assets/files/1954/schwarzplan.jpg
> All the areas where the streets widen significantly at junctions with other
> streets are likely squares (you can’t see the smaller ones in this scale).
> The surrounding buildings will ofte
a few trees (landuse=meadow).
Mappers always have to make decisions on border cases, and usually the
decision will come down to "what is most of the area covered with?"
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/24/20, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 23. Mar 20
flowers, shrubs, gardens, water features, etc, else it's a park or
garden.
That's whey the prior definition is inadequate: it is non-orthagonal,
it can include many types of features, and is impossible to translate
into different cultures.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Martin,
What would you proposed as the description= (in the Infobox) for place=square?
What changes do you propose to the current text of the page to improve
the definition?
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/24/20, Greg Troxel wrote:
> Martin Koppenhoefer writes:
>
>> Am Mo., 23. März 2
place=square. If it doesn't have to be hardscaped (whether paved or
just packed soil), should it at least lack tall vegetation which
blocks views and movement?
Perhaps a flat area with mostly short grass can still be a square, but
certainly not if it is mostly covered by trees, s
)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Alun-alun_Tugu_-_Bunder_-_panoramio.jpg
C)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Square_Trenggalek_-_Alun-Alun_Trenggalek_-_panoramio_(10).jpg
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/23/20, António Madeira wrote:
> When you say description, are you referring to th
highway=footway + area=yes), or the tag was correct
>> indeed and the name has been forgotten.
>>
>> Query for unnamed square in a bounding box:
>> https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ROw
>>
>> I also suggest to update wiki descriptions of place=* tags, upgrading
>
;a town square", because I need to be able to translate it into
Indonesia, for people who have never seen a European town square. I
suspect that Japanese and Korean will have the same problem, along
with many other non-European languages.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/23/20, Paul Allen wrote:
> O
would be tunnel=yes, whether or not there is a side-path.
(This is the problem with proposals that introduce several new tags
all at once. I would have been better to discuss tunnel=flooded
separately, so that this problem would not have occured.)
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/23/20, Warin <61sundow...
e may be not much area for
people to stand or walk, or it will be divided into 4 or more small
pieces. Rather junction=yes seems perfect for this, with the only
problem being that it is very popular in Asia but not very common in
Europe.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/22/20, Paul Allen wrote:
> On Sun
ccessible in operation or man_made=pipeline for sections built
with tube assemblies."
Key:waterway says: "A long (> 100 m) tunnel where flowing water or
other fluid prevent humans from safely walking inside despite its
appropriate diameter or size. Water inside can be
ort". Is that a requirement for
using the tag?
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/21/20, althio wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 12:24, Andrew Harvey
> wrote:
>
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
>>
>> disused:building=service
>>
>
> This, and:
&g
building=service
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 5:24 PM Andrew Harvey
wrote:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
>
> disused:building=service
>
> On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 19:13, s8evq wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> How would you tag a small building that used to be an electricity
>> b
ed_house, building=house,
building=dormitory, and so on.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/21/20, Guillermo Ariel Silva Lopez wrote:
> Hi Joseph, the mappers will survey the buildings with mapillary imagery
> that we upload for them, these buildings are already mapped in the
> Openstreetmap Da
o see "How we map"
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map
And "how to map landuse" which includes a relatively complete list of
tags related to how lands and buildings are used:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Landuse
I hope your project is successful!
-- Joseph E
ic feature.
But I would caution against adding this to private house features, due
to privacy laws in some countries.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/21/20, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21/3/20 9:00 am, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 2
d
be junction=yes (for a named street intersection or road junction) or
leisure=park or place=neighborhood.
Also check if there are highway=pedestrian areas with a name=* which
could better have the name added to a new place=square node instead.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
_
“32 Tennant Creek” won’t work?
As mentioned, addr:full could work
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 12:48 PM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19/3/20 1:57 pm, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
>
> there don't appear to be any way to enter addresses that use Post Office Boxes
>
deposite
outgoing letters:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpost_box
Is anything else missing, which can't be mapped with these tags or
with Key:addr:* ?
If none of the common values of addr:* will work, you can use addr:full=*
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/addr%3Aful
don't
seem to have anything to do with windmills and watermills?
What about the exiting tags man_made=windpump, man_made=windmill,
man_made=watermill? Are you proposing to deprecate these common tags?
(also in the examples "actuator=manual" is mentioned, but it isn't in the list)
t available.
This option allows to avoid pump:type=* as well."
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/19/20, François Lacombe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Following several discussions last month, including this one:
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2020-February/051385.html
>
>
Voting on the proposal for place=refugee_site ends today or tomorrow,
depending on your time zone.
Current vote is 11 oppose, 27 approve - currently below the percentage
needed to be approved but close.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/12/20, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> Voting is still open a few m
ants-inhabit-adirondack-ice-meadows.html
On 3/17/20, Kevin Kenny wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 1:46 AM Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>>
>> In American English, especially in the west, the word “meadow” is used for
>> areas in the high mountains which grow grasses, sedges, annua
I've opened an issue at JOSM to add a preset. Could someone check if
there is one in iD, and if not, open an issue to add
man_made=goods_conveyor at https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/pulls
please?
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/15/20, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> It’s been added to the
, and applied it to mountain grasslands?
I agree that alpine “meadows” should be tagged natural=grassland, but don’t
be surprised to find some mapped as “landuse=meadow” in the mountains of
California and Colorado.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 2:20 PM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.
(Source: I used to work "bucking hay", lifting hay bales onto the
truck, during high school)
On 3/15/20, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 15/3/20 4:36 pm, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
>> Unfortunately, a slight change to the description on the wiki will not
>> st
ver, other herbaceous
plants) is just as important as the presence of grazing or occasional
hay-cutting, to define a meadow or pasture.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/15/20, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The present description of landuse=meadow is;
>
> An area of meadow or pa
It’s been added to the lists at Key:man_made and Map Features.
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 5:31 AM John Willis via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> Javbw
>
> > On Mar 12, 2020, at 8:22 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
> >
> > I am in favor of adding it right away.
>
> ___
ic line.
Otherwise the length of this "platform" way would be arbitrary: why
not include the whole block?
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/12/20, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 22:22, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>> > I am thinking of cases like streetside stops fo
wn or place=village."
You cannot tag the same Openstreetmap database object with both
place=town and place=refugee_site - you would have to create 2
separate nodes.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/3/20, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> I do not believe the concerns and questions at the talk page have been
ould not be good to map this on lines where different vehicles
can vary in length or door configuration, or if the operators do not
stop the vehicle in a certain place each time)
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/12/20, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 08:12, Jo wrote:
>> That st
o objection to rendering this!
I don't have any rendering ideas for this feature in the Openstreetmap
Carto map style, but if someone wants to work on it, see issue 1999:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1999
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/12/20, Kevin Kenny wrote:
> On Wed
p.org/tags/?key=man_made&value=goods_conveyor#map
But it's not on the Key:man_made page or Map Features.
Is there enough usage to just add it to those pages, or should the
proposal be voted on first?
Old proposal page from 2015:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_feat
> if we have to keep highway=bus_stop anyway, then one could also say that
> it's not needed to add public_transport=platform to such nodes anymore.
Yes, that's right. It doesn't make sense to add 2 tags or 3 tags when 1 will do.
On 3/11/20, Jo wrote:
>>
>>
>> But if the originally, more commo
the originally, more common
tag highway=bus_stop is already used, there is no need to add bus=yes.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/11/20, Peter Elderson wrote:
> I get the impression that consensus and general adoption will not be
> reached during my lifetime.
>
> Good luck with it, I'm
he documentation.
But perhaps "drinking_water:fee=yes" could be proposed as an
alternative, for places that only sell water.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/10/20, European Water Project wrote:
> Hi Jake,
>
>
> i strongly prefer paying 75 centimes for a ecologically sustainable
> These "parks" often have identical characteristics to these
tourism=*_site : they sometimes have a common reception desk for
different camp_pitch, toilets, a drinking water point, ...
Many places in the USA are tagged leisure=park when they really ought
to be boundary=protected area, or divided
hould not make changes lightly.
But this should not prevent us from making a change which would make
things easier for mappers and might better represent reality.
Greater ease of mapping is a strong reason to consider changes to
editor applications.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/8/20, Paul Allen wr
ld this tag be used along with "man_made=survey_point?" only?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurvey_point
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/8/20, Anne-Karoline Distel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been surveying benchmarks for the past four months and I would like
> to
more success to focus
on adding this simpler and easier option, rather than removing other,
more complicated options.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/8/20, John Doe wrote:
>
>
> 08-Mar-2020 03:56:45 Joseph Eisenberg :
>
>>
>> > routes without fixed stops can easily be repr
attempt to
call anything "deprecated" or force anyone to use the new mapping
style.
It would be enough to say that "adding all the bus stops or platforms
and all the highway or rail ways to the relation is not necessary, one
or the other is enough", and for database users to
the wiki. This
may send you an email notification, or you can check:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Special:Watchlist - and turn off
email notifications.
I've reverted the revert. :-)
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/7/20, Alessandro Sarretta wrote:
> Hi Stuart,
>
> On 07/03/2
proposal has good ideas which might be considered:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Refined_Public_Transport
- Joseph Eisenberg
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 8:23 AM Peter Elderson wrote:
> So, what about the idea to store the route in a separate route relation,
> then add i
Talk page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/name:Zsye
Especially the sections "Why?"
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/name:Zsye#Why.3F)
and the two following concerns about the language code and wikidata.
- Joseph Eisenberg
, so any cross which has some historic value.
So if the crosses which you want to map are "always religious and most
of the time historic", probably this tag is more appropriate for most
of them, certainly for all 3 examples which you linked above.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/5/20, Antó
t.
For these reasons, the current version of the proposal should not be approved.
I suggest improving the definition of the tags and making it very
clear which new tags are being approved by the proposal.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/2/20, Manon Viou wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> The proposed featur
renderer, we try to represent reality as best
we can.
Land that is used for student dorms or apartments is not objectively
different than any other residential area, except for the age of the
residents, whether or not it is operated by a University
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 2/29/20, Mateusz Koniec
> amenity=social_facility
Most amenity=social_facility features are large "facilities" like a
homeless shelter or nursing home or hospice.
I don't think that tag is appropriate for a refrigerator.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 2/29/20, Jmapb wrote:
> On 2/26/2020 4:32 PM, Mart
ki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aman_made%3Dpumping_station
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 2/29/20, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 29/2/20 9:51 am, François Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> One simple question : according to you, what is the most suitable key
>> t
ear ways which are not areas:
for example, rivers, roads, paths, fences, etc.
-Joseph Eisenberg
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
be put
into one line, it does generally put the arrows pointing down (the
upstream way is first, downstream last).
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 2/27/20, Andrew Davidson wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2020, 13:48 Joseph Eisenberg,
> wrote:
>
>> When you make or sort a relation of type=waterwa
py the text from:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:drinking_water&action=edit
Then edit it to match your new proposal.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 2/26/20, European Water Project wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since no one has manifested an objection (still not too late), I am going
>
waterway) should be last. This practice
has not been followed in the areas where I have mapped.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Relation:waterway#Sort_order.3F
Is this done in your area?
- Joseph Eisenberg
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging
but feel
free to create a new tag for the special details of water circulation
in geothermal plants if you are interested.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 2/27/20, François Lacombe wrote:
> Hi
>
> Le jeu. 27 févr. 2020 à 00:23, Joseph Eisenberg
>
> a écrit :
>
>> Different tags are
oleum_well is a natural gas or crude oil well, but
many (most?) petroleum wells produce both oil and gas.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 2/27/20, François Lacombe wrote:
> Le mer. 26 févr. 2020 à 22:06, Martin Koppenhoefer
> a écrit :
>
>>
>> these aren’t independent concepts, a
.org/wiki/Wellhead and
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Completion_(oil_and_gas_wells)
Do you know if all "pumping rigs" are similar in appearance to a
pumpjack, or are there others that look quite different?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pumpjack - I've seen many of these in
California
be on ground or water"
But petroleum_well says just: "An oil well is a boring in the Earth
that is designed to bring petroleum oil or gas to the surface."
I believe not all petrolum wells have a pumping rig? Can someone
confirm that these tags are different?
;
(when including only yes/no votes, without abstain comments)"
Does anyone else want to add their comments or votes there? This seems
to be a rough consensus now.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 2/14/20, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Am Fr., 14. Feb. 2020 um 10:43 Uhr schrieb European Water Project &
The tag tourism=attraction is poorly defined, but it is mainly used for
permanent features, places that are year-round (or at least summer/winter
season) attractions.
I think it would be better to use a more specific tag for an annual event
which lasts for days or weeks only.
If it is an annual m
e in
a hurry. (Hopefully it won't rain).
In remote areas, where there are no public buses, it is possible to
hire an ojek for a 10 or 20 kilometer ride up to a village. Sometimes
the road is more of a path, only passable by 2-wheeled vehicles, so a
t
water is not
readily observable, and that drinking_water=yes is generally used for
features that provide drinking water, rather than merely containing
it, as stated on the wiki page for that tag.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 2/21/20, European Water Project wrote:
> And maybe it shouldn't be map
> and what kind of vehicles you can find there.
> That could looks like this:
> amenity=taxi
> taxi:motorcycle=yes
> taxi:car=yes
> taxi:tricycle=yes
> ...
>
> (or other more British words ;)
>
>
> Le jeu. 20 févr. 2020 à 08:50, Joseph Eisenberg
>
> a écrit :
>
&
Oh, here in Indonesia you can find motorcycle taxis (ojek) everywhere,
including in all the towns where bicycle rickshaws / pedicabs operate.
For example, all of the markets in my town have a pangkalan ojek
(motorcycle taxi stand) and a separate pangkalan becak (pedicab
stand), usually near the ma
also, expressway=*
is used differently in some States, as mentioned on the wiki page:
sometimes it is about limited access, other times it's about grade
separation.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 2/20/20, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Am Do., 20. Feb. 2020 um 13:07 Uhr schrieb Joseph Eisenberg <
orth
America (except for the tourist pedicabs as mentioned), which makes it
harder to pick a good tag value which will work everywhere.
Are you aware of any alternative phrase or word which would be clearer?
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 2/20/20, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
> As a person from the Philipp
tead.
If a highway=trunk is not defined as an expressway in a particular
country (e.g. in Britain, Spain, Indonesia, Australia...), there is a
benefit to having some other tag or tags that express how the road is
constructed.
On 2/20/20, Volker Schmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 at 01:41, Jo
, since those
are much more efficient.
I will consider proposing the other 2 tags later, but motorcyle taxis
are by far the most common. I would bet there are more "ojek" stands
in Indonesia than taxi stands in all of Europe.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 2/20/20, marc marc wrote:
> Le 20.
.
If people are interested in using it, I might make a proposal. But
perhaps we will decided that database users should interpret the
geometry and name=/ref= tags of parallel highway ways to add this
information in post-processing. Does anyone know if that is feasible?
On 2/20/20, marc marc wrote:
>
> use amenity=taxi with motorcycle=yes, motorcar=no for motorbike based taxi
> stands.
That combination has only been used 145 times, in spite of being
including in the Phillipines tagging guidelines and previously on
Tag:amenity=taxi: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/QTu
There are more places with na
ng highway=bus_stop for taxis by arguing
that they are both publically available forms of passenger
transportation, even though a bus runs on a fixed schedule and route
and carries many different people, while a taxi is hired privately and
goes directly to your destination.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 2/20/
merely disused, and is still visibly a landfill
from survey (or good aerial imagery) and might be reopened again, you
can still tag it as landuse=landfill + disused=yes, since it is still
visibly a landfill. This would be more verifiable)
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 2/20/20, Jez Nicholson wrote:
>&g
While some have proposed using amenity=taxi plus additional tags for
motorcycle taxi stands, this is quite confusing for travelers who
generally expect a "taxi" to be 4-wheeled motorcar capable of carrying
4 people and luggage. So a different tag is propos
I've created a page for Key:dual_carriageway based on existing usage
in the database:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:dual_carriageway
On 2/20/20, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> I updated the Key:expressway page to have a global focus, rather than
> being United-States-specific
uot; without a
tag like "dual_carriageway=yes", especially if there the name= and
ref= are not identical for each direction.
- Joseph Eisenberg
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
that
mean "donation of objects with value".
Also, the phrase "donation of goods" in English is easier to
understand, since it does not require interpreting an unusual use of
the noun "kind", which usually means "class, sort, variety or type of
something" in modern English, except in the phrase "in kind".
- Joseph Eisenberg
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
oridinary British person would talk about donating
some used books or toys, right?
Joseph Eisenberg
On 2/19/20, Philip Barnes wrote:
> Hi Joseph
> In British English the phrase has the same meaning as you describe.
>
> The most common usage is in taxation terms when an emplo
", "second_hand_donation=",
"donation=second_hand_goods" or something with one of those other
common words for objects.
But perhaps the key should include the type of things, since mostly
people will say "donate used clothes", "donate used books" or
for a special event or construction project.
-Joseph Eisenberg
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
enstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:landuse%3Danimal_keeping
- this tag could be better defined.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 2/17/20, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
> What do we call fenced off yards that are used to hold horses (or other
> stock, for that matter) temporarily?
>
> This was one that
201 - 300 of 1105 matches
Mail list logo
