2011/3/18 Flaimo fla...@gmail.com:
since i wasn't the only one wondering on how to map individual parking
spaces, i took the chance to write my first proposal. it's ready for
comments and can be found here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/parking
While I agree that
2011/3/18 j...@jfeldredge.com:
What I was visualizing was not so much real-time traffic mapping, but rather
that certain roads are almost guaranteed to be uncrossable on foot at certain
times of day, such as at rush hour. If you are trying to cross them at times
when the traffic is light,
2011/3/18 Flaimo fla...@gmail.com:
i think you misread the proposal. you don't tag any capacity tags on a
single parking space. and all common properties can also be defined in
the relation,
IMHO no need for a relation, as the amenity=parking around it already
gives you this information. You
2011/3/18 Flaimo fla...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 13:27, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/3/18 Flaimo fla...@gmail.com:
i don't agree with that, because only the physical areas where, for
example a car, can park is a parking space/area, but not for example
2011/3/18 Flaimo fla...@gmail.com:
ok, i see what you mean now. use amenity=parking for the whole
facility, and the new tags for defining the elements inside.
+1
that only
works without a relation as long as you only have one logical parking
lot that's not split up in different areas. but
2011/3/18 Flaimo fla...@gmail.com:
just relying on a surrounding amenity=parking area without a relation
also has another flaw: underground parking. basically nobody maps
underground parking facilities as areas with layer=-1. all of those i
have seen so far in OSM are mapped as nodes at the
2011/3/19 geowas geo...@gmx.de:
What is the best/recommended/suitable way to map border watch towers (used
by border police/soldiers)
you could use man_made=tower and look for a suitable tower:type. There
is observation
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tower:type=observation but the
2011/3/21 Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com:
As per the discussion last week about Sidewalks, I'm re-opening the
sidewalk proposal as per:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Sidewalk
basically your are suggesting cycleway=track for sidewalks. This works
up to some extend,
2011/3/21 Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de:
He said, they prefer the sidewalk:left|right:*-tagging scheme at the
street's ways.
When I asked how they would like to model crossings - like I asked here, too
- he did not have an answer.
yes, and even if you mapped them perfectly jsut
sorry for joining late into this discussion.
By looking again at the proposal I think that besides the re-naming of
protect_id to protect_class we could also think about other issues.
If you look at 97 and 98: protected by continental agreements. They
often cover sites already protected by
2011/3/21 David Paleino da...@debian.org:
I agree with Serge: you would change the meaning of highway=footway
(because to interpret it right after your amendment, you would have to
look at the footway-key as well).
Why?
Sidewalks are just a particular case of highway=footway. A router that
2011/3/21 David Paleino da...@debian.org:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:12:55 +0100, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/3/21 David Paleino da...@debian.org:
I agree with Serge: you would change the meaning of highway=footway
(because to interpret it right after your amendment, you would have
2011/3/22 Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com:
I would not support this proposal to the *exclusion* of mapping separate
ways. Rather, I would support this proposal as the simplest way to add
sidewalk data with the understanding that if a mapper wishes to add
further detail to the sidewalks that they
2011/3/21 David Paleino da...@debian.org:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:04:38 -0400, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
[..] and I feel David wants something else entirely and
is suffering from a bit of NIH syndrome, [..]
While I thought at the proposal entirely (almost, credits also go to #osm-it
folks) on my
2011/3/22 Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com:
Martin,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:32 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/3/21 David Paleino da...@debian.org:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:12:55 +0100, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/3/21 David Paleino da...@debian.org
2011/3/25 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net:
David Paleino wrote:
Potlatch 2 _already_ has excellent relation support.
However:
My proposal doesn't use anything special to be implemented in editors.
That's not the point.
Well, somehow it is. He has suggested to use the associatedStreet
2011/3/25 Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com:
I agree, it is confusing. I've used the separate way method quite
extensively in a suburban (subdivision) area. Perhaps I could create
some illustrations, though since I'm not much of an artist it will
probably be just screenshots. In the meantime you can
2011/3/27 Pierre-Alain Dorange pdora...@mac.com:
Following recent international events, i start study nuclear site on
OSM.
Nuclear power plant seems presents and use
power=generator
power_source=nuclear
power_rating=2000 MW
but according to wiki, this was obsolete and
2011/3/27 Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@glebius.int.ru:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 12:01:28PM +0100, Andrew Ainsworth wrote:
A Listing the type of reactor (PWR for example) seems like a reasonable idea
A but we shouldn't get into tagging safety features such as core catcher.
A There is a virtually
2011/3/28 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 11:04 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/3/27 Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@glebius.int.ru:
We are making map, not encyclopedia.
no, we are creating a geo database.
Someone needs to update the site's name and its
2011/3/28 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Someone needs to update the site's name and its introductory material
(e.g. OpenStreetMap is a free editable map of the whole world)
maybe someone already did, I read in the front page, first sentence:
Welcome to OpenStreetMap
OpenStreetMap creates and
2011/3/29 Peter Gervai grin...@gmail.com:
shouldn't care about specific parts of it, unless they're separate
objects (which I guess never being the case, at least I've never
observed a crop created by a dozen polygons describing corn, wheat and
marijuana separately :-)).
In fact they should.
Federico Cozzi has made a draft for detailed bicycle shop mapping.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/shop:bicycle
Please comment in the propopal's talk page.
I am announcing here because he is not signed up to tagging.
cheers,
Martin
2011/3/29 Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net:
On 3/29/11 8:09 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2
In fact they should. I mean not necessarily for different plants, but
for different adjacent crops. Mapping single crops is enhancing the
map with detail about the topological layout of an area
2011/3/30 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
On 3/30/2011 9:20 AM, Pieren wrote:
Perhaps on this particular proposal, we have some cultural
misunderstanding . In many countries, you have illegal buildings,
illegal garbage dumps, illegal access restrictions, etc. Even when they
are convicted
2011/3/31 Lennard l...@xs4all.nl
If the direction of the way is drawn in the same flow of the water, it
should always be drawn with an arrow.
What if it's drawn the other way?
mapping error. What if a coastline is drawn the other way? Rendering the
flow of waterways in mapnik would help
2011/4/1 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com
On 4/1/2011 9:53 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
flow of waterways in mapnik would help to fix those errors, because more
people would become aware.
mapping error. What if a coastline is drawn the other way? Rendering the
Still doesn't deal
2011/4/1 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com
On 4/1/2011 10:38 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Yes of course. I set FIXME=please check flow direction if I am unsure
(usually you can deduct the flow direction but there is rare cases where
it is not possible).
With manmade channels it's far
2011/4/1 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com
On 4/1/2011 11:24 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
like an overfall).
if I get this right (sounds
No, it's the same canal, with water flowing the other direction. This is
the S-58 structure: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?node=944499871
2011/4/1 Ilya Zverev zve...@textual.ru
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 17:35:37 +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
what natural=water on an area means. Is this area a lake, a pond? We
have
no means to determine that now.
could you expand what a pond is? I get several
2011/4/2 Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com
There are lots of tags that are direction dependant:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Way_Direction_Dependent
It does seem like josm handles many of those in a good way, not all by
far though.
there is also highway=steps which I
2011/4/2 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com
Tracktype is verifiable against a visual scale:
http://wiki.openstreetmcan't
givap.org/wiki/Tracktypehttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tracktype
but as it depends much on the climate and surface material / vegatation /
ground it still has to be
2011/4/3 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com
There you can use incline=* to be explicit.
Yes, I know, but when I started mapping back in 2/2008 there was no incline
proposal, and later I found it sufficient to keep the implicit information.
Nobody used to draw plans would draw steps
2011/4/9 Kolossos tim.al...@s2002.tu-chemnitz.de:
Hello,
there is a new tool to bring more Wikipedia-Tags inside OSM-database and
connect so both projects more and more. It can be found here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/RemoteControl/Add-tags
Tim, this is great news!
2011/4/8 Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com:
Good idea, but not with etymology as the name. This is not the etymology;
that would be the philological origins of the word.
+1
Here we are talking
about a description of the person the place is named after, and especially
the reason why
2011/4/10 Flaimo fla...@gmail.com:
since there haven't been any new comments over the last couple of days
i would like to start the voting for the proposal next weekend. here's
the link again in case you haven't read it yet:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/parking
I am
2011/4/11 Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org:
Maybe it could also be interesting to describe where the camera is
mounted (pole / wall / etc.). Recently I found this strange camera in
Heidelberg on top of the roof of the church mounted _up_wards (I guess
it could be a webcam / weathercam for
2011/4/11 Flaimo fla...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 01:15, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not sure if it is a good idea to put all these new tags into the
amenity namespace. Amenities are general features (e.g. mapnik tries
to render all of them
Recently I found this sign which I interpret as access forbidden to
touristic busses:
http://www.23hq.com/dieterdreist/photo/6610385
It is at a driveway to the local cemetery, near a very popular
monument (unesco world heritage). Do we have to invent another access
tag, or is there already
2011/4/12 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
My first idea was tourist_bus=no
Why not use access:*=* ?
Usually we tag foot=no instead of access:foot=no, and I don't see why
I should change this standard here.
My question was: which key is used for tourist busses. I couldn't
find them on
2011/4/12 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
Why not use access:*=* ?
Usually we tag foot=no instead of access:foot=no, and I don't see why
I should change this standard here.
There is a lot of access:*=* for vehicles, so you would be going against
things.
Where? I can't find them:
2011/4/12 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
On 12 April 2011 20:36, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Where? I can't find them:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dbdouble
Wikipage modified 13 times, in the database 0 (zero) occurrences ;-)
http
2011/4/14 SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk:
neighbourhood sounds pretty similar to locality - a couple of examples
on the place=locality page could count (e.g. Seacroft in Leeds, if it's
considered too small to be a suburb).
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Locality
Whoever wrote
2011/4/14 Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org:
lanes=2, oneway=yes
it's the same as for cars. Otherwise it would be lanes=2, oneway=no
Is lanes=* overall number of lanes (in which the example where there's
two bicycle lanes would be a total of four lanes) or is it lanes open to
all traffic
Hi,
some questions from a non-native (to the British, US, AU and other natives):
1. What is a steel worker?
Is it someone who works in a steel mill
http://growthexpertblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/SteelWorkerGentex_l1.jpg
or is it someone who builds structural steel work (aka the men
2011/4/15 Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com:
I feel so confused... of course you aren't talking about mapping people ??
Let's say I am tagging people offering services. I am less interested
in the man working in the steel mill, I am interested in the word for
constructing supporting/structural
2011/4/15 Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhau...@gmail.com:
I think Josh's joke does get to a serious answer to your question: I don't
think you should use the word that describes the worker, but the word that
describes the work. However, I see that in the craft=* space (is this where
you're heading
2011/4/15 Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de:
On the other hand we in Germany - probably in the German speaking countries
in general (but I'm not sure) do not consequently distinguish between making
cuffins and making furniture - although there are words for either historic
meaning -
I am announcing an RFC on behalf of Federico Cozzi for the key shop:bicycle:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/shop:bicycle
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
2011/4/17 Andreas Hubel a...@saerdnaer.de:
the plant site is a way with
• barrier: fence
• name: Kernkraftwerk Gundremmingen
• power: generator
• power_source: nuclear
Additional there would be a ton of additional options by using relations ;-)
I suggest not to
2011/4/18 Andre Engels andreeng...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Sander Deryckere sander...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem with this tagging method is that the tag highway=cycleway is
now used for two completely different features. A cycle track next to a road
is something
2011/4/18 Sander Deryckere sander...@gmail.com:
to complete the picture: you can also use
highway=path
bicycle=designated (some are even using official)
instead of highway=cycleway.
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
2011/4/18 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
On 4/18/2011 10:25 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
It has different implications in some jurisdictions. E.g. in Germany
or Italy you have to use a cycleway if it goes along a road, you can't
use the road by bike any more, unless the cycleway
2011/4/18 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
On 4/18/2011 1:22 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/4/18 Nathan Edgars IInerou...@gmail.com:
In that case, where one legally has to use the sidepath, the main roadway
should be tagged bicycle=no or bicycle=local.
no.
It is an implication
2011/4/18 Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com:
A router should detect the highway=cycleway parallel to the road and make use
of it (probably easier said than done).
Yes, I guess this is impossible. You might be able to get a good
guess, but you would need a 3D highly detailed map to be sure in all
2011/4/19 Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org:
It has different implications in some jurisdictions. E.g. in Germany
or Italy you have to use a cycleway if it goes along a road, you can't
use the road by bike any more, unless the cycleway is blocked, or for
other reasons in unusable conditions or
2011/4/21 Flaimo fla...@gmail.com:
created a proposal for amenity=daycare:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/daycare
I agree that this is a feature we want to have, but I don't think
there should be rendering suggestions in the feature description, and
I can't agree that
2011/4/22 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
Using both railway=station and amenity=bus_station gives two labels in
Mapnik. I reported this as a bug but apparently it's not fixable:
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/3478 What should be done?
are the busses using the rails and the trains
2011/4/24 Flaimo fla...@gmail.com:
i have started a proposal for simple automated tasks. i will leave it
in the RFC state until someone, who knows how to create a bot, can
provide a prototype for a small imited bbox, so we can see if this one
is actually doable (performance and security wise).
2011/4/25 David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au:
The signs I saw applied to
trucks and buses though, more than just hgv/goods. As Tobias said, your
suggestion is suitable, Id add the suggestion of maxspeed:bus also.
bus in OSM is defined as a bus performing public transport service
[1]. I
2011/4/27 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
On 4/27/2011 1:27 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
Hi all,
What do guys think of using branch=* to specify the particular branch
or outlet of a chain of stores/amenities?
I think the standard is brand=*.
yes, this is also used for gas
2011/4/28 David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au:
That doesnt detract from the original question, of what to map a site of
historic significance.
historic=event and event=event-class?
or historic:event=yes/event-class ?
the ever useful, never descriptive tourism=attraction could also be used.
2011/4/28 Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com:
phase maps. For example, I've mapped memorial sites related to battles of
the Italian Risorgimento, but not the place where the battles themselves
took place. Also, I've mapped many plates dedicated to kings, soldiers and
patriots, because
2011/4/29 Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de:
It appears that people have been using car as a key for this purpose.
Should I use that, and add an appropriate entry below motorcar=*?
-1
IMHO motorcar should be defined as automobile/car, and not be used as
a generic term including busses, hgv,
2011/4/30 Sebastian Hohmann m...@s-hohmann.de:
Am 30.04.2011 12:10, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
motorcar is supposed to represent the class of Zeichen 251 (shows a car
from the front), which forbids all double-tracked motor vehicles (which
includes hgv and buses etc).
this is how I see
2011/4/30 Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de:
And if you feel you need more classifications, here's a Wikipedia article on
the EU classification:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/EG-Fahrzeugklasse (seems there's no English
version)
There is no English version of this, and it seems to deal only with
2011/5/1 David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au:
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 02:10 +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote:
If I was towing a caravan, I wouldnt set my navigation device to think
Im in a car or a motorbike, Id most probably use hgv.
this thread is not about hacking your system so that it does
2011/5/1 Andrew Cleveland evil.salt...@gmail.com:
Can the highway=proposed tag apply to highways which were proposed but
are no longer?
no, IMHO highway=proposed doesn't apply. This would not be a proposed
(planned) highway but a formerly proposed highway. If you want to put
them into OSM
2011/5/2 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
To stop a beginning of edit war
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Map_Features:historicaction=history),
I would like try something new and ask your feedback about the tag
history=event wiki page.
This tag is the result of a former
I announce on behalf of Federico Cozzi that voting is open for
service:bicycle
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/service:bicycle
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
2011/5/4 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
Am 04.05.2011 10:31, schrieb Richard Mann:
We just had a discussion on talk-de and the german community about this
issue.
The problem with footway/cycleway is that they mix access and highway.
Well, this is valid for lots of highway types (implicit
2011/5/5 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
Even if historic=event is removed from the wiki, and even if
historic=battlefield is removed I doubt it will stop people mapping
these locations, they are important to people, and people have already
shown that there are physical places that can
2011/5/5 Andre Engels andreeng...@gmail.com:
Unless you are in New Zealand, you're unlikely to tag the same thing:
It's being used for a Maori fortress, see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P%C4%81_%28M%C4%81ori%29
IMHO the tag is not very well chosen. Besides that I agree with John
Smith
2011/5/5 Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com:
2011/5/5 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
Aren't we nitpicking? I've tagged remains of Roman cities whose physical
presence is arguable, but nonetheless those are places of historical
interest in that a Roman building or forum was there.
2011/5/5 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 6:26 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
Note that the OP is about historic=event, not battlefield. The edit war
started because JohnSmith documented what you, Martin, suggested in a
previous thread although
2011/5/5 Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de:
I've completed the draft and would like to solicit your comments:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Car_access_tag
The proposal introduces a new tag car=* that applies to just cars, and
clarifies the meaning of the motorcar=* tag,
There is a new draft how to tag advertising objects.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/advertising
Are there any comments on this? What should be added/changed?
According to tagwatch, some of the proposed values are already in use:
2011/5/8 Flaimo fla...@gmail.com:
no further comments over the last 1 1/2 weeks, so i'll start the
voting phase: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/childcare
sorry for writing late, I think there are some problems.
E.g. age.
if you tagged a feature with
amenity=childcare
2011/5/9 Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhau...@gmail.com:
I notice the suggested rendering is similar to schools. Don't know about
other areas, but in the US, many childcare centers are run out of private
homes, so that rendering might seem a little strange. Maybe in that case a
node is a better
2011/5/10 Flaimo fla...@gmail.com:
Further, i too consider the social facility tags to negative. Besides
that, i couldn't see a social_facility=* value that would fit. the
or=child part references to an target audience, which would
correspond more to the age tag of my proposal and not the
2011/5/11 Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com:
It's been about a month now, and I've gotten some feedback from the
talk page. My thoughts are that we either:
* reuse the existing place=suburb (as the wiki definition seems like
it might work)
* use the new place=neighbourhood
yes, you can use suburb
2011/5/11 Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl:
Of course there can also be parallel
hierarchies, like police force areas and their districts and subdistricts,
or postal systems with major towns, distribution points and individual
postcodes (in the UK these frequently span national borders!).
2011/5/11 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
There's a problem if this is treated like landuse.
it is not landuse, so there is no problem. There is still space for
landuse=highway.
The highway landuse goes
up to the edge of the right-of-way, and includes sidewalks and and clear
zones,
2011/5/11 Ilya Zverev zve...@textual.ru:
I've reverted his edits of the proposal page, but is he right? Is any
proposal with incorrect subject line in tagging@ post (let along those
which weren't mentioned here) automatically invalid?
Well, it is an established convention to send an email to
2011/5/11 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
The proposal makes reference to landuse, in particular stating that one
might cut off adjacent landuses at its border. But the two positions on
landuse are that it shouldn't be cut or that it should be cut at the
right-of-way line, not at the edge
Actually there is a problem here:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/keys/water#values
water is already in wide use, but most of the values in use are not
part of the proposal. Maybe some amendmend or changing of the key name
(e.g. water:type seems to be what the proposal wants to achieve:
2011/5/11 Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de:
Flaimo wrote:
In the example image, lanes (in this case: sidewalks) of the road that
are mapped as separate ways also have their own areas. Currently, I tend
to instead support one area for the entire road, containing the central
highway ways and
2011/5/11 Flaimo fla...@gmail.com:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/childcare#Voting
I don't see why there should be service_hours:childcare. Can't we
reuse service_times?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service_times
cheers,
Martin
2011/5/11 j...@jfeldredge.com:
Part of the problem is that neighborhoods, unlike official administrative
units, or even Home Owner Associations, don't necessarily have agreed-upon
boundaries. Different people may consider the same location to be in
different neighborhoods.
then it's a
2011/5/11 Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com:
Can we begin discussion of this? A place_level that allows for
unincorporated areas, neighborhoods, and the like.
I am not sure that we need a place_level. Such a key would only make
sense if there was a clear hierarchy. Place structures can be
different
2011/5/12 Flaimo fla...@gmail.com:
i changed the main key to service_times, but i kept the subkey.
otherwise it would be problematic in case someone want to tag the
office hours separately.
IMHO the key service_times refers to the feature, which is children
daycare in this case. There is no
2011/5/12 j...@jfeldredge.com:
Also, sidewalks are not always directly next to the driving lanes. There are
sometimes grassy borders between the driving lanes and the sidewalk.
Typically, this is a meter or so, but can be wider. On one street here in
Nashville, Tennessee, USA, the
2011/5/12 Sean Horgan seanhor...@gmail.com:
I personally like when OSM definitions are linked to other references,
especially a well-known source like wikipedia.
at least then link to a specific version of an article.
From http://www.thefreedictionary.com/social+service:
social service
n.
2011/5/12 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
What do we do with dual-carriage ways ?
Sometimes there exist paved connections between both directions. Maybe
blocked by a barrier but that is no need.
if they are constantly connected (no change of the paving, no physical
barrier) it's actually not
2011/5/12 Flaimo fla...@gmail.com:
when was the topic of webcams ever mentioned?
they are part of the contact-proposal. I mentioned them to point out,
that even if everyone followed this proposal and added contact: to
some of the tags, this wouldn't improve overall consistency.
contact
2011/5/13 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
OK, but there's still the issue of a so-called flush median. I think in a
rural area with few intersections this would be called a dual carriageway. I
can't find an image, but Interstate 90 used to have one over Lookout Pass in
Idaho. You can
2011/5/13 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
On 5/13/2011 6:47 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
An emergency vehicle could also cross a grass median if there's no raised
barrier.
yes, and a person can jump over a 2ft wall and climb a 8ft wall. A
series of bollards is no barrier to bicycles
2011/5/14 Flaimo fla...@gmail.com:
any other comments on that proposal? otherwise i'll start the voting phase:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/addr_keys_%282011-04%29
Yes. You are currently concentrating on the micro level, but there
could be a suggestion for the
isn't this information a router could gain from the data simply by
looking where the ramp leads to?
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
2011/5/16 David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au:
I agree. I think seafood is a more generic proposal than 'fishmonger'
which may not be understood as widely.
I recall this vivid discussion where in the end it was agreed on
shop=seafood (with myself not beeing extremely happy about it, because
601 - 700 of 771 matches
Mail list logo
