Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal Rejected - RFC - Admission

IMO the word 'issue' here only makes sense if I read your description - encountering it out in the wild, I would have no idea what is meant https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/issue. The usage of issue as a verb is not all too common without further specification and goes against typical OSM

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - electricity

Hello all, as there have been no further comments, I'd like to open the proposal for electricity to voting: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/electricity Cheers Lukas ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Animal trails

I wouldn't tag this as foot=no or access=no. There are many trails in my area that are clearly animal tracks and seldom used by people - but it is allowed for people to walk on these and they are sometimes significant shortcuts so allowing routing over them in some cases would be good.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - electricity=*

nov. 2020 à 02:46, Lukas Richert <mailto:lrich...@posteo.de>> a écrit : Hi, I was actually thinking of the type of battery, i.e. flywheel, LiOn, etc. Although it would probably also be interesting to figure out a tagging scheme to classify batteries by type, cap

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - electricity=*

to the wiki, feel free! :) Best regards, Lukas On 15.11.20 01:49, François Lacombe wrote: Lukas, Le sam. 14 nov. 2020 à 21:00, Lukas Richert <mailto:lrich...@posteo.net>> a écrit : Hi François, I do actually like the word input for generator and have been

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - electricity=*

and would separate them. My only problem with that is that the wikipage would probably need a flowchart to explain the tagging :/ What do you think? Regards, Lukas On 14.11.20 20:07, François Lacombe wrote: Thank you Lukas for answers Le sam. 14 nov. 2020 à 17:56, Lukas Richert <mailto:lr

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - electricity=*

and then have a separate tag like battery:type=electric_vehicle or some such. Cheers, Lukas On 14.11.20 18:43, Paul Allen wrote: On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 at 17:24, Lukas Richert <mailto:lrich...@posteo.de>> wrote: The possible values for any of these subkeys is then yes/backup/no

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - electricity=*

then be discussed separately. And if a new method of acquiring electricity is introduced (wireless charging?) it could be easily added to the current tagging. Regards, Lukas On 12.11.20 02:15, Lukas Richert wrote: If it's unclear I would just leave electricity:grid untagged as there's no way

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - electricity=*

, François Lacombe wrote: Hi Lukas Le jeu. 12 nov. 2020 à 00:48, Lukas Richert <mailto:lrich...@posteo.de>> a écrit : electricity:generator:origin <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:electricity:generator:origin=edit=1>=solar I didn't get in det

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - electricity=*

. Really, there isn't any way to know, without getting creepy - snoopy. SteveA On Nov 11, 2020, at 3:45 PM, Lukas Richert wrote: If I understood you correctly, this would fall under grid-connected houses that I mentioned in the last example. This was the specific reason why I think namespace tag

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - electricity=*

If I understood you correctly, this would fall under grid-connected houses that I mentioned in the last example. This was the specific reason why I think namespace tagging seems to be clearer. The house would then be tagged with: building

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - electricity=*

. I'd be happy to hear more feedback on the proposal as it currently stands. Otherwise, if discussion concludes this week I would then move on to voting next week. Cheers, Lukas On 05/11/2020 15:32, Lukas Richert wrote: I have now switched over the tagging and examples to the namespace based

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - electricity=*

and electricity=no in the case of grid connected houses experiencing a long-term power outage during a natural disaster? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/electricity Regards, Lukas On 03/11/2020 22:07, Lukas Richert wrote: I also think the *electricity:grid=yes/no/backup

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - electricity=*

/11/2020 21:20, Andrew Harvey wrote: On Wed, 4 Nov 2020 at 00:13, Lukas Richert <mailto:lrich...@posteo.de>> wrote: Hi, While the original proposal did specify that generators are usually diesel, broadening the definition would only lead to a loss of detail, but the tagg

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - electricity=*

://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Global_Healthsites_Mapping_Project <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Global_Healthsites_Mapping_Project> where the tag is used. Good job, Lukas! -- Dolly Andriatsiferana On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 4:11 AM Lukas Richert <mailto:lrich...@posteo.d

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - electricity=*

And, final email, I reworked the proposal page to include tagged examples and explained some implicit defintions in more detail. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/electricity Cheers On 30/10/2020 13:44, Lukas Richert wrote: Since a lot of people apparently didnt see

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - electricity=*

n Key:socket power_supply:source -> values and meaning as described for power:source and generator:source power_supply:fee -> already in use! power_supply:access -> like in common tags like toilets:access Jan On 30.10.20 13:44, Lukas Richert wrote: Since a lot of people

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - electricity=*

e, what about other services like drinking water, sewage, surface water drainage, television antennas, Internet connection, postal delivery services, garbage collection, and so on? I have to confess, I only have questions, but no answers. Volker On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 at 13:47, Lukas Richer

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - electrcity=*

tep...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 29/10/2020 16:50, Lukas Richert wrote: > as I've received no further comments to the proposal and all points > brought up should be resolved, > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/electricity is > open for vot

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - electricity=*

Since a lot of people apparently didnt see the RFC the first time, I'll go back to RFC status for now. (I thought the threads were sorted by subject title of the email and didnt check online if it was actually visible. )

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - electrcity=*

Good evening, as I've received no further comments to the proposal and all points brought up should be resolved, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/electricity is open for voting now. Cheers, Lukas ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] Tagging from fire_service_areas - landuse:emergency

I think here it would better to use the primary name space of emergency, similar to disused/abandoned, so that routers/data providers that don't consider this tag won't lead people to park there. On 28/10/2020 05:21, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: Oct 28, 2020, 03:22 by

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Proposal of electricity=* and electricity:origin

There were quite a few comments the first time around, so I just wanted to call attention to the electricity proposal (see links below) once more. I fear it got lost in the hullabaloo about the man_made tag. Also, perhaps relevant: both the power_supply

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Proposal of electricity=* and electricity:origin

(Fixed subject line for RFC) Hello all, after the comments on the confusing nature of the word 'source' in my original proposal of 'electricity:source', I have now changed the name to 'electricity:origin' as suggested on the discussion page. Furthermore, I would like to revive and extend the

[Tagging] Proposal of electricity=* and electricity:origin

Hello all, after the comments on the confusing nature of the word 'source' in my original proposal of 'electricity:source', I have now changed the name to 'electricity:origin' as suggested on the discussion page. Furthermore, I would like to revive and extend the proposal of the key

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - electricity:source

station. Lukas, did you consider charging_station:source ? to be similar to other power tags (power:generator + generator:source=solar, power:plant = plant:source=solar)? On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 9:30 PM Lukas Richert <mailto:lrich...@posteo.de>> wrote: Hi Colin, I agree tha

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - electricity:source

otherwise is not determined by the connection, but by the subscription/contract that the consumer has with their supplier. UNLESS they have a standalone generating capability, like PV or wind turbine that is not connected to the grid. On 2020-09-29 16:00, Lukas Richert wrote: Hi, I'd like to pro

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - electricity:source

Hi, I'd like to propose a new tag that defines the source of publicly available electricity: electricity:source This could be used as an additional information tag on amenities that provide electricity for public