Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 18, 2015, at 8:12 AM, Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de wrote:
If the facility is a stand-alone facility whose primary purpose is not as a
place to worship - but merely operated by a religious entity - such as a
school, hospital, etc, then it is tagged as it
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:32 PM, David Bannon dban...@internode.on.net
wrote:
On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 10:30 -0800, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
OK, then lets write up a formal proposal. As I said, I'm not opposed,
just sceptical that it will succeed.
Do you propose something like -
On 18/02/2015 11:07 AM, John Willis wrote:
Religious landuse is not about saying that the ground is religious, any more than saying
landuse=retail is land that is for sale - it is for the land dedicated to a facility where people
worship - just as retail is where people sell, and residential
The only thing I got from your talk was that you don't like manmade landuses,
or every facility you have ever mapped is a single use, single purpose shop,
always separated from the other - never in a shared space that is named
something differently.
If you have one named facility - a shopping
Right- per the wiki: with few exceptions.
The religious object is the ground.
But that really applies to the other Millions of religious facilities with a
building and a space around the worshipping facility.
Javbw
On Feb 18, 2015, at 9:19 AM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On 18/02/2015 11:33 AM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 5:56 AM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com
mailto:bry...@obviously.com wrote:
You can recycle all sorts of existing tags, there is no need to
invent new ones:
Exactly. If we adopt a top level amenity tag for our
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 18, 2015, at 9:50 AM, John Willis jo...@mac.com wrote:
Right- per the wiki: with few exceptions.
The religious object is the ground.
But that really applies to the other
Correction : rarely
Millions of religious facilities with a building and a space
If the facility is a stand-alone facility whose primary purpose is not as a
place to worship - but merely operated by a religious entity - such as a
school, hospital, etc, then it is tagged as it currently is.
I fail to see how some grass or parking lot around the church is the
primarty
On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 08:52 +1100, Warin wrote:
go with a new top level tag ... waste_collection=*
-
To say there is no support for a new top level tag waste_collection=*
based on the talk here .. well there are lots of people not saying
anything .. possibly
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 5:56 AM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
You can recycle all sorts of existing tags, there is no need to invent new
ones:
Exactly. If we adopt a top level amenity tag for our waste disposal problem
the other tags normally associated with amenities can be
Am 18.02.2015 um 07:18 schrieb Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbek...@gmail.com:
I vote for the middle option: waste=dump_station
semantically this sounds as if dump_station was a kind of waste, not a place
type to put waste
cheers
Martin
___
Tagging
I vote for the middle option: waste=dump_station. My main reason is that it
consistent with the existing system and that there will not be yet another
node if more than one type of waste is collected.
On Wed Feb 18 2015 at 4:52:39 AM David Bannon dban...@internode.on.net
wrote:
On Wed,
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbek...@gmail.com
wrote:
I vote for the middle option: waste=dump_station. My main reason is that
it consistent with the existing system and that there will not be yet
another node if more than one type of waste is collected.
Dump
On 18/02/2015 5:42 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Jan van Bekkum
jan.vanbek...@gmail.com mailto:jan.vanbek...@gmail.com wrote:
I vote for the middle option: waste=dump_station. My main reason
is that it consistent with the existing system and that there will
Hi,
According to ticket 5278
https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/5278that I filed, the problem is
that translation is WYSI*N*WYG.
An unknown person has to kick off the update at unknown times of which
we just know that they are rare. Plus, the actual search is a bit more
forgiving [than what
2015-02-17 14:21 GMT+01:00 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
Is there any difference considering the foundation of the structure ?
Towers usually have one and mast not ?
everything that has to put load onto ground will need some sort of
foundations, of course masts do have foundations.
On February 17, 2015 4:56:26 AM CST, David Bannon dban...@internode.on.net
wrote:
On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 06:09 +, Jan van Bekkum wrote:
...
Trying to invent as few new tags as possible the updated proposal
would become:
* power_supply=nema_5_15
*
Excellent job. Thanks for all your hard work.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:10 PM, John Willis jo...@mac.com wrote:
I added two sections to the wiki - Purpose and limitations to try to spell
out what we talked about.
I also wrote that POW on an area as a landuse for most uses will be
superseded
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 02:32:21PM +0100, fly wrote:
Am 17.02.2015 um 12:59 schrieb Richard Z.:
Hi,
RFC for aerialway=zip line is opened:
This was a typo. True is aerialway=zip_line.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_feature/aerialway%3Dzip_line
Would not include the
Am 17.02.2015 um 01:07 schrieb Warin:
On 16/02/2015 11:33 PM, fly wrote:
Be careful some mast as support for wind generators might be entered.
Thought antenna vs mast might be a problem but not mast vs tower.
Should have added some picture. Please have a look at the pictures on
[1] and [2]:
Am 17.02.2015 um 12:59 schrieb Richard Z.:
Hi,
RFC for aerialway=zip line is opened:
This was a typo. True is aerialway=zip_line.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_feature/aerialway%3Dzip_line
Would not include the zip_line on playgrounds as playground=zipwire
[1][2] is already
On 16/02/2015, Kytömaa Lauri lauri.kyto...@aalto.fi wrote:
The width of the vehicle that could use the way can be wider than the way
itself [...]
Another example where width != maxwidth:physical is a twisty tunnel.
The longer a vehicle is, the more margin it requires to be able to
pass. So a
On Feb 17, 2015, at 9:14 AM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
It would also be good to have a tag for a site accepting household toxic
wastes such as used batteries, cleaning chemicals, leftover paint, and the
like. Here in Nashville, Tennessee, USA, such substances are not supposed to
included
Richard Z. wrote on 2015-02-17 15:26:
Otherwise you need to deprecate playground=zipwire.
ok, I am in favor of deprecating playground=zipwire. Large share of aerialway
ziplines are part of adult playgrounds. Technically there are no universally
valid principal differences that could
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:50 AM, David Bannon dban...@internode.on.net
wrote:
On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 21:34 -0800, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
The real question is what type of tag would attract rendering
support. amenity=dump_station is easier to deal with,
as it's a single level that maps to
On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 21:34 -0800, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
The real question is what type of tag would attract rendering
support. amenity=dump_station is easier to deal with,
as it's a single level that maps to the commonly understood function
of a place to dump a sewage holding tank.
Hi,
RFC for aerialway=zip line is opened:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_feature/aerialway%3Dzip_line
Regards,
Richard
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
I'm lurking but you know where I stand on this tag.
+1 for amenity=dump_station
Cheers,
Dave
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:50 PM, David Bannon dban...@internode.on.net
wrote:
On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 21:34 -0800, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
The real question is what type of tag would attract
On 16/02/2015, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-02-16 10:42 GMT+01:00 Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com:
* maxwidth: this is a legal limitation; nothing wider than the given
value may use the feature
+1, there is also the synonym maxwidth:legal (IMHO not advisable,
Having a landuse for “religion” seems simple to understand
Oh really? Is every Kindergarden run by the chruch in Bavaria now a
landuse=religious? What about office building run by the church? What if
they overlap with other landuses?
If people really continute to use this tag I will use it
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 07:19:35PM +0100, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
Richard Z. wrote on 2015-02-17 15:26:
Otherwise you need to deprecate playground=zipwire.
ok, I am in favor of deprecating playground=zipwire. Large share of aerialway
ziplines are part of adult playgrounds. Technically there are
Am 17.02.2015 um 22:02 schrieb Andreas Goss:
Having a landuse for “religion” seems simple to understand
Oh really? Is every Kindergarden run by the chruch in Bavaria now a
landuse=religious? What about office building run by the church? What if
they overlap with other landuses?
If people
On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 10:30 -0800, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
It's hard to go far wrong with a dedicated tag for a feature with:
1) A strong clear definition
2) That features prominently on printed recreation maps, with a
standard icon.
3) Has a large community of mappers behind it.
OK, then lets
Please read the wiki page, especially the section on limitations.
If the facility is a stand-alone facility whose primary purpose is not as a
place to worship - but merely operated by a religious entity - such as a
school, hospital, etc, then it is tagged as it currently is.
If the
On 18/02/2015 8:32 AM, David Bannon wrote:
On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 10:30 -0800, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
It's hard to go far wrong with a dedicated tag for a feature with:
1) A strong clear definition
2) That features prominently on printed recreation maps, with a
standard icon.
3) Has a large
Andreas Goss wrote on 2015-02-17 22:02:
If people really continute to use this tag I will use it for everything
run by the chatholic church in Germany, after all they are the largest
private land owner... Then they can have fun with their church yards.
the tag is about land_use_, not
Am 17.02.2015 um 22:40 schrieb Tom Pfeifer:
Andreas Goss wrote on 2015-02-17 22:02:
If people really continute to use this tag I will use it for everything
run by the chatholic church in Germany, after all they are the largest
private land owner... Then they can have fun with their church
fly wrote on 2015-02-17 23:12:
I still do not understand, why we can not use religion=* without any
landuse.
on which area description?
I have no problem to additionally add amenity=place_of_worship or
appropriate tag to the area.
I have.
The same is true for supermarket with there
own
2015-02-17 1:07 GMT+01:00 Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com:
I like the easy distinction between mast and tower by the guy wires. If it
is technically correct ..
actually it isn't working in all cases, there are hybrid towers (still
called towers)
___
On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 06:09 +, Jan van Bekkum wrote:
...
Trying to invent as few new tags as possible the updated proposal
would become:
* power_supply=nema_5_15
* power_supply:schedule= [...] - has syntax as defined for
opening_hours
Or
*
I added two sections to the wiki - Purpose and limitations to try to spell out
what we talked about.
I also wrote that POW on an area as a landuse for most uses will be superseded
by landuse=religious, and the POW tag is very important as a tag for a building
or physical object that resides
What other uses exist in practice in addition to *waste=chemical_toilet? *
For camping we have run into two cases I would like to have covered:
1. Disposal of chemical toilet contents: a place where you carry a tank
to empty and clean it
2. A sink in the street: you drive your RV over it
42 matches
Mail list logo
