If a building is all one address, I see no reason not to tag the building
outline.
If there are multiple addresses, then nodes are a good way to go.
Both schemes are in use.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26/05/2015 3:23 PM, Marc Gemis wrote:
based on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Animal
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com
wrote:
While the names are confusing, the concepts seem to
Your still missing the point.
Depending on the country, state, area the address does not necessarily
refer to the building.
In Australia the address refers to the property ie the plot of ground
that is defined by the cadastral plan.
So those plots of ground may be 600 sq m or 1,000,000
I have not followed this discussion so must ask, is this dog relief area a
place where dogs and other pets can leave excrement?
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26/05/2015 3:23
On 27/05/2015 9:16 AM, pmailkeey . wrote:
And more parking:
trolley_parking (near supermarkets)
pram_parking
Umbrella
coat
And anything else we might need to park. Wheelchairs, mobility
scooter, motorbikes...
You do not park a horse! Nor a dog.
The function is akin to car parking and bicycle parking. Sticking with
that theme, we'd get dog parking and horse parking. A sign labelled 'dog
park' tagged as dog parking has obvious links but the to tag a dog park
sign with 'hitching rail' breaks the similarity - a similarity that would
No, it's about (e.g.) a metal bar outside a shop where a dog chained while
the owner is inside.
Mike posted some pictures earlier on.
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 2:27 AM, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have not followed this discussion so must ask, is this dog relief area a
place
On 26/05/2015 3:23 PM, Marc Gemis wrote:
based on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Animal
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com
mailto:bry...@obviously.com wrote:
While the names are confusing, the concepts seem to be:
1) Hitching racks for
Am 25.05.2015 um 20:58 schrieb Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com:
Creating a wikidata object out of a wikipedia article is a non issue. You
just get an object with no attributes, only a link to the article.
Even articles like Wikipedia disambiguation pages have wikidata objects:
Am 25.05.2015 um 17:18 schrieb Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com:
amenity=charging_station
fee=no
access=public
socket:USB=yes
socket:typeb=yes
motor_vehicle=no
There are currently only 7 socket:typeb=* in the world including the 6 I just
added and a similar number of
On 26 May 2015 at 00:35, moltonel 3x Combo molto...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/05/2015, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On 25 May 2015 at 22:18, moltonel 3x Combo molto...@gmail.com wrote:
How do you link to a wikidata label in an OSM tag ? One that never
suffers from renaming ? As
Am 26.05.2015 um 11:11 schrieb Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk:
a hotel that includes a restaurant. OSM uses
two objects from the begining, both linked to the single wikidata
article that talks about the hotel as a whole.
OSM should only link the hotel item to the Wikipedia
On 26 May 2015 at 10:25, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
how can you edit wikidata?
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Introduction
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
___
Tagging mailing list
On 26/05/2015, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
My main concern with wikidata for the moment: it's mostly as fuzzy as
Wikipedia is - because the objects are not created by humans but conversions
of articles. Using only wikidata would mean we are sure that wikidata will
be a
I wouldn't deprecate the wikipedia tags either. They give a human readable
form of what is hopefully the same item on WD.
I only hope that we won't stop at adding only the WP tags. Also I don't
think anybody is adding name:etymology:wikipedia tags, but we do have
name:etymology:wikidata
So a
On 26/05/2015 6:11 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 25.05.2015 um 17:53 schrieb pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com:
CONGRATULATIONS ! You win the award for the best puzzle of the year! It appears
to be a loose numbering system for identifying entrances rather than properties.
that's
On 26 May 2015 at 10:36, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 26.05.2015 um 11:11 schrieb Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk:
a hotel that includes a restaurant. OSM uses
two objects from the begining, both linked to the single wikidata
article that talks about the hotel
On 26/05/2015, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
You don't link to a Wikidata label, you link to a Wikidata item.
QED, you can only use wikidata IDs such as Q936 in OSM tags, which
is much less userfriendly than the wikipedia equivalent. You brought
wikidata labels to the discussion;
Am 25.05.2015 um 21:18 schrieb Thorsten Alge li...@thorsten-alge.de:
Since wikipedia migrated the interwikilinks (the link which are
connecting the article in language a of something to all other articles
in a different language about that same topic) it is where you get links
to
Am 26.05.2015 um 12:08 schrieb Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk:
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Introduction
Thank you for this pointer, it's appreciated.
Are there definitions for the properties? I have had a look at the examples and
landed here:
uto, 26. svi 2015. 11:20 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com je
napisao:
yes, basically at the moment wikidata entities have almost the same issues
as wp articles have (because they have been created from the articles) with
the advantage of the capability of better handling of name
Level should be the layers relative to the (lowest) ground, regardless of
how that's defined in the building, for consistency sake. As often as not
here, 1 is either the second floor off the ground or the ground floor, with
G being Ground. Granted, this gets a little tricker, with complex
Am 26.05.2015 um 12:46 schrieb Jo winfi...@gmail.com:
Also I don't think anybody is adding name:etymology:wikipedia tags, but we do
have name:etymology:wikidata
there are a few tags like that:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=%3Awikipedia
I agree that wikidata is better for
-- Original message --From: ba...@ursamundi.orgSent: 26/05/2015 12:07To: tagging@openstreetmap.orgSubject: Re: [Tagging] Wiki: Key:level: proposed rewriteLevel should be the layers relative to the (lowest) ground, regardless of how thats defined in the building, for consistency sake. As often
W dniu 26.05.2015 12:46, Jo napisał(a):
So a usecase:
Say you want to locate all the streets and other objects named after
17th century Dutch painters, worldwide.
You could start by finding the painters from wikidata, then use the
Overpass API to do a regular expression search with all the
Did you forget to add any comments?
On May 26, 2015 6:58:49 AM wp4...@gmail.com wrote:
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
___
Tagging
I think we need a separate instalation of wikibase on our wiki. No need to
fork wikibase. Then we can organize our tags in categories, subcategories,
relations to outside data like wikidata and so on.
Not only that, but make that wikibase a sort of an API to our tags. For
example, if a data
On 26.05.2015 20:06, Janko Mihelić wrote:
I think we need a separate instalation of wikibase on our wiki.
A wikibase installation on wiki.osm.org would be really useful, in many
different ways.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On 26 May 2015 at 13:01, Daniel Koć daniel@koć.pl wrote:
So a usecase:
Say you want to locate all the streets and other objects named after
17th century Dutch painters, worldwide.
You could start by finding the painters from wikidata, then use the
Overpass API to do a regular expression
W dniu 26.05.2015 16:54, Andy Mabbett napisał(a):
On 26 May 2015 at 13:01, Daniel Koć daniel@koć.pl wrote:
Wikidata alone may be problematic, because it's independent project,
Why would that be a problem?
If you start rely on something, it's good if you have some control of it
and if it
On 26 May 2015 at 07:33, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26/05/2015 3:23 PM, Marc Gemis wrote:
based on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Animal
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com
wrote:
While the names are confusing, the concepts seem to be:
Mike, you are missing the point... A building and an address are two
different things. A building may have 0 to N addresses. An address may
or may not refer to a building. The business rules to link the two
concepts vary by country. An address is not usually a unique identifier
of a building -
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 18:06 +, Janko Mihelić wrote:
I think we need a separate instalation of wikibase on our wiki. No
need to fork wikibase. Then we can organize our tags in categories,
subcategories, relations to outside data like wikidata and so on.
Yep, great concept, could be OSM
On 5/26/15 6:56 PM, pmailkeey . wrote:
Building addresses shouldn't be on nodes. Named entrances can be - on
ent/exit nodes.
if building addresses shouldn't be on nodes, what are we to make of
the address interpolation feature?
richard
--
rwe...@averillpark.net
Averill Park Networking -
On 26 May 2015 at 09:11, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 25.05.2015 um 17:53 schrieb pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com:
CONGRATULATIONS ! You win the award for the best puzzle of the year! It
appears to be a loose numbering system for identifying entrances
And more parking:
trolley_parking (near supermarkets)
pram_parking
Umbrella
coat
And anything else we might need to park. Wheelchairs, mobility scooter,
motorbikes...
--
Mike.
@millomweb https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction -
For all your info on Millom and South Copeland
On 26 May 2015 at 18:32, Andrew Guertin andrew.guer...@uvm.edu wrote:
On 05/23/2015 12:47 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
In the meantime I have tagged those areas with
amenity=charging_station until we resolve this question.
By going against the documentation, you are breaking the data for
On 27 May 2015 at 00:06, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Mike, you are missing the point... A building and an address are two
different things. A building may have 0 to N addresses. An address may or
may not refer to a building. The business rules to link the two concepts
vary by
On 05/23/2015 12:47 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
In the meantime I have tagged those areas with
amenity=charging_station until we resolve this question.
By going against the documentation, you are breaking the data for
consumers that follow the documentation. At the very least Osmand 2.0.4
39 matches
Mail list logo
