I asked:
Is it worth questioning the stop names? The ones named BQ in
Clacton for example are outside their old site (now The
Range), as BQ moved to new premises about 5 years ago. I've
not yet been to the BQ stops to see if they have the name on
(some stops around here do, some don't - and
I reckon name should be something like what-people-would-call-
them [or
what bus-drivers-would-understand], not necessarily as flagged.
The problem with this would, in the case of the BQ stops be that
I could probably say any of the following:
I'd like to get off at (or near)
* the ambulance
Problem is determining commonnames without reference to passengers - so
you end up with Bridge Lane opp Health Centre (n bound) when 'BQ' would
be better.
Don't think there is much common at all about naming streets after side
streets - few people (mappers and posties excluded unfortunately)
Don't be too hasty (although 5 years seems long enough): there are two stops on
Castle Boulevard, Nottingham named MFI, which must be 2 years 'out-of-date'.
Many locals will remember the presence of MFI long after the chain closed and
the site is used for something else. There is a location on
OK, I think we have a potential case of GMaps + OSM data here...
http://blog.monopolycitystreets.com/ says:
Q - Why isn't my street on the map?
A - Monopoly City Streets is an application built to be used on top of the
Google Street Maps and Open Street Map. We can only make streets available
I wanted to create a similar shapefile like this
(http://old-dev.openstreetmap.org/~random/postcodes/) for my area.
The first step is to extract postcodes in OSM.
The problem there several postcode variations in the database
addr:postcode
postal_code
is_in:zip
Some are in node (POIs) others in
Hi,
I've found a lot of hospitals in Seoul:
http://www.informationfreeway.org/index.php?lat=37.50829282lon=127.0368347zoom=14layers=BF000F
Could someone check, if they are realy there?
This looks also very nice:
James
Sorry to hear that.
Thanks for the warning.
Speak sometime.
STEVE
-Original Message-
From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org on behalf of maning sambale
Sent: Tue 08/09/2009 10:26
To: osm-talk
Cc:
Subject: [OSM-talk] creating
2009/9/8 maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com:
I wanted to create a similar shapefile like this
(http://old-dev.openstreetmap.org/~random/postcodes/) for my area.
The first step is to extract postcodes in OSM.
The problem there several postcode variations in the database
addr:postcode
Hi,
I can see that Potlach support source tag but JOSM doesn't.
You can see the example here:
http://bayimg.com/image/dadjnaacm.jpg
Do you use source tag? Why and how, please explain? I read the wiki page
but I don't see many people use it and I'm wondering why.
--
pratite me na twitteru -
On Tue, September 8, 2009 19:09, Raphael Studer wrote:
Hi,
I've found a lot of hospitals in Seoul:
http://www.informationfreeway.org/index.php?lat=37.50829282lon=127.036834
7zoom=14layers=BF000F
Could someone check, if they are realy there?
This is a side-effect of a bulk-upload. In
2009/9/8 Valent Turkovic valent.turko...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I can see that Potlach support source tag but JOSM doesn't.
You can see the example here:
http://bayimg.com/image/dadjnaacm.jpg
Do you use source tag? Why and how, please explain? I read the wiki page
but I don't see many people use
Valent Turkovic wrote:
I can see that Potlach support source tag but JOSM doesn't.
Do you use source tag? Why and how, please explain? I read the wiki page
but I don't see many people use it and I'm wondering why.
JOSM supports addition of any tag, provided you can type, so I don't see
why
El Martes, 8 de Septiembre de 2009, Valent Turkovic escribió:
Do you use source tag? Why and how, please explain? I read the wiki page
but I don't see many people use it and I'm wondering why.
JOSM dev version being able to tag changeset + source tag = win.
It would be very nice to have JOSM
2009/9/8 Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es:
It would be very nice to have JOSM add a source tag to the changeset if a WMS
layer has been used during editing, though. Would make my life a lot easier
and not forget about those source=yahoo tags.
What if they use GPX files and a WMS
El Martes, 8 de Septiembre de 2009, John Smith escribió:
2009/9/8 Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es:
It would be very nice to have JOSM add a source tag to the changeset if a
WMS layer has been used during editing, though. Would make my life a lot
easier and not forget about those
2009/9/8 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
2009/9/8 Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es:
It would be very nice to have JOSM add a source tag to the changeset if a WMS
layer has been used during editing, though. Would make my life a lot easier
and not forget about those source=yahoo
El Martes, 8 de Septiembre de 2009, John Smith escribió:
2009/9/8 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
2009/9/8 Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es:
It would be very nice to have JOSM add a source tag to the changeset if
a WMS layer has been used during editing, though. Would make my
At 12:40 08/09/2009, Andrew Errington wrote:
By the way, I just requested the creation of a talk-ko mailing list, but
nothing's happening there yet (only a handful of mappers here!).
Hopefully this sort of thing can be brought up and solved.
Subscribe to talk-ko at
2009/9/8 Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es:
And, for example, I may draw a street using Y!, but somebody may modify just
the name of the street during a mapping party. No need to delete the
source=yahoo of the previous changeset.
which is why you use source:name=*
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El Martes, 8 de Septiembre de 2009, John Smith escribió:
2009/9/8 Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es:
It would be very nice to have JOSM add a source tag to the changeset if a
WMS layer has been used during editing, though. Would make my life a lot
easier and
This looks also very nice:
http://www.informationfreeway.org/index.php?lat=37.5760761lon=126.97864158zoom=13layers=BF000F
Looks like a font size issue in the renderer.
No, the problem is the hundreds of place=town. Most of these should probably
suburbs.
Besides that, there are also
At 11:40 08/09/2009, Valent Turkovic wrote:
Do you use source tag? Why and how, please explain? I read the wiki page
but I don't see many people use it and I'm wondering why.
I try to put it on everything I map. It shows fellow mappers how
accurate my contribution is. They can make a more
On 8 Sep 2009, at 12:21, Someoneelse wrote:
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El Martes, 8 de Septiembre de 2009, John Smith escribió:
2009/9/8 Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es:
It would be very nice to have JOSM add a source tag to the
changeset if a
WMS layer has been used during
On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:43:22 +0200, Lennard wrote:
why you'd say it doesn't support source=*. You're not always, every
time, relying only on built in presets, are you?
Presets speedup many things, so it would be nice to have also presets for
source= tag.
--
pratite me na twitteru -
Hi, I'm using address interpolation for the first time so I would like to
ask if somebody can check if I did it ok or if there are some errors:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.544703lon=18.718653zoom=18layers=B000FTF
Thank you in advance!
--
pratite me na twitteru -
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Shaun McDonald wrote:
I'm not going to waste my time updating a source tag on every node,
way or relation that I touch. However I'm happy to add ti to the
changeset where it belongs.
It's actually quite easy in JOSM
you mass select them and add the tag
On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:57:10 +0200, Pascal Neis wrote:
Of course planned, but atm I can not say when it will happen.
pascal
Thank you for all your hard work and effort in making ORS service.
I have one related question - do turn restrictions and oneway streets
work on ORS service?
--
On 08/09/2009 13:06, Liz wrote:
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Shaun McDonald wrote:
I'm not going to waste my time updating a source tag on every node,
way or relation that I touch. However I'm happy to add ti to the
changeset where it belongs.
It's actually quite easy in JOSM
you mass select
Liz wrote:
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Shaun McDonald wrote:
I'm not going to waste my time updating a source tag on every node,
way or relation that I touch. However I'm happy to add ti to the
changeset where it belongs.
It's actually quite easy in JOSM
you mass select them and add the tag
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Valent
Turkovicvalent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm using address interpolation for the first time so I would like to
ask if somebody can check if I did it ok or if there are some errors:
On 08/09/2009 13:16, Tobias Knerr wrote:
Liz wrote:
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Shaun McDonald wrote:
I'm not going to waste my time updating a source tag on every node,
way or relation that I touch. However I'm happy to add ti to the
changeset where it belongs.
It's actually quite easy in JOSM
using the postcode-code, I get this error
python makeShapeColoured.py -h
Traceback (most recent call last):
File makeShapeColoured.py, line 34, in module
import shapelib.shapelib as shp, shapelib.dbflib as dbf
ImportError: No module named shapelib.shapelib
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 6:30 PM,
On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 22:06:28 +1000, Liz wrote:
It's actually quite easy in JOSM
you mass select them and add the tag
I know it is possible, but I would love if JOSM would offer options like
Potlach does.
--
pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt
Valent Turkovic wrote:
Presets speedup many things, so it would be nice to have also presets for
source= tag.
Then create your own presets for your desired source=* tags.
--
Lennard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 12:22:48PM +, Valent Turkovic wrote:
On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 22:06:28 +1000, Liz wrote:
It's actually quite easy in JOSM
you mass select them and add the tag
I know it is possible, but I would love if JOSM would offer options like
Potlach does.
Its easy to
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/newbies/2007-October/000625.htmlmay
be of interest - if it isn't in the wiki.
just discovered this myself now too.
k.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Lennard l...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Valent Turkovic wrote:
Presets speedup many things, so it would be
David Earl wrote:
On 08/09/2009 13:16, Tobias Knerr wrote:
Liz wrote:
It's actually quite easy in JOSM
you mass select them and add the tag
If mass selecting is possible, the changeset would have been the better
place, imo. Tags on individual objects do only make sense if you need to
add
Am 08.09.2009 um 14:11 schrieb Valent Turkovic valent.turko...@gmail.com
:
On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:57:10 +0200, Pascal Neis wrote:
Of course planned, but atm I can not say when it will happen.
pascal
Thank you for all your hard work and effort in making ORS service.
I have one related
I already installed shapelib in ubunut jaunty and I still get the same error
python makeShapeColoured.py
/home/maning/gisrs/osm_postcode/combined_postcode.csv
Traceback (most recent call last):
File makeShapeColoured.py, line 34, in module
import shapelib.shapelib as shp, shapelib.dbflib as
2009/9/9 d f fac63te...@yahoo.com:
John
Surely if a way needs shifting, it needs shifting, irrelevant of what the
source was?
Is you GPS more accurate than mine?
If you answer yes to the above how do you know this?
If 10 people do a GPS trace of the same way, the way could move 10
times
John
Surely if a way needs shifting, it needs shifting, irrelevant of what the
source was?
-
I've seen people, quite rightly, removing nonsensical source tags such as
Source=JOSM/Potlatch!!
JOSM Ptlatch are _not_ the source, just the means by which to input the data
into OSM.
The
...without the right information being presented to later users.
Not sure what you men by that. However...
If there are 10 traces by GPS for a way I think it's out of alignment from
the average of them, then I would move it.
Irrelevant of what the source tag for the way.
Cheers
Dave F.
If there are 10 traces by GPS for a way I think it's out of alignment from
the average of them, then I would move it.
Irrelevant of what the source tag for the way.
Please don't do this unless you have clear evidence it's wrong, you could well
be messing up perfectly accurate data.
What if
2009/9/9 d f fac63te...@yahoo.com:
...without the right information being presented to later users.
Not sure what you men by that. However...
If there are 10 traces by GPS for a way I think it's out of alignment from
the average of them, then I would move it.
Irrelevant of what the
2009/9/9 Mike N. nice...@att.net:
There are some odd cases where even GPS averaging is not accurate enough to
'micro adjust' a way by 1-3 meters. One of which is where the sensor is
inside a vehicle (not rooftop mounted) on some curves. I observe this by
comparing multiple traces from
From: Donald Allwright donald_allwri...@yahoo.com
To: d f fac63te...@yahoo.com
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, 8 September, 2009 16:25:41
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] source=(survey, yahoo, gps...)
If there are 10 traces by GPS for a way I think it's
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Valent
Turkovicvalent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:43:22 +0200, Lennard wrote:
why you'd say it doesn't support source=*. You're not always, every
time, relying only on built in presets, are you?
Presets speedup many things, so it would be
It's obviously nonsense - a way extending right across the globe! But it
looks like scribbling, the kind of thing people do in Potlatch not
realising they are editing the live map.
Despite the prompts at the beginning people STILL don't realise they are
doing this. This is the second time this
I just discovered a suspicious looking edit while working on a map splitter
tool (http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/page/tile-splitter), as follows:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/737502
The splitter tool ended up creating a separate area just for node 355719431,
which is completely on
You don't have access to the 10 traces,
Yes I would. In Potlatch if I press G or click the GPS icon it display all
uploaded traces.
I should have said assuming
none uploads the information how do you know your information is any
better than what already
http://events.nokia.com/nokiaworld/home.htm
--
Keynote: Next Generation Maps
Larry Kaplan, President and CEO, Navteq
--
Talks about routing, data capture/processing...
Simon.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Shouldn't the name tags in Seoul also be fixed a bit? Instead of a Hangul name
followed by a Latin-alphabet name in brackets, wouldn't it be better to tag
name...@hangul and name...@latin separately?
--
Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com
___
talk mailing
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:26 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
it would be nice to tag things like GPS model, not just that it was
from a GPS, some models are better than others and so on and so forth.
In which case you ought to just upload the GPS data, right? GPX supports
2009/9/9 d f fac63te...@yahoo.com:
Yes I would. In Potlatch if I press G or click the GPS icon it display all
uploaded traces.
It's a hypothetical and the GPS traces were not uploaded so you
wouldn't be able to download anything.
I don't. But I take the average of all the traces available. i
Hi List,
The A57 and A607 edits below are incorrect to the best of my
knowledge.
--
Regards
Bob
Lincoln UK
On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 18:56:27 +0100, you wrote:
3. Re: RR8 - Possible International Vandal (assistance required
around Lincoln, England) (Someoneelse)
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 07
Chris Miller wrote:
than myself please delete it? I haven't done any editing of the osm data
Deleted...
Matthias
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
David Earl wrote:
It's obviously nonsense - a way extending right across the globe! But it
looks like scribbling, the kind of thing people do in Potlatch not
realising they are editing the live map.
Despite the prompts at the beginning people STILL don't realise they are
doing this. This is
In general, using anything Google to generate information for OSM violates
Google's copyrights and possibly other copyrights that Google doesn't hold.
Google Street View images are geocoded information and definitely
copyrighted as such. They have special value in their geocoding. Using
images
Check this out:
http://blog.monopolycitystreets.com/2009/09/almost-there.html
Might be interesting to contact them and see what they're using the data
for.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Is it okay to use Google Street View to confirm turning restrictions, street
names, etc? This seems like an obvious yes to me, but then, I would have
said the same thing about tracing from a satellite photo, so I'm not going
to try to guess international copyright law.
On 8 Sep 2009, at 22:21, Eric Wolf wrote:
Further, you should only be using satellite imagery to generate OSM
data if the copyright has been released for that purpose (like
Yahoo's imagery in the US) or if the imagery is provided without
restriction (like USGS imagery).
Why do you
Yes - but you are inherently deriving the location from the images
georeferencing. If the image were provided outside of the context of Google
Streets, you might be able to make the claim that looking at the image
doesn't violate the copyright. But the fact that the image contains
geospatially
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Valent
Turkovicvalent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you use source tag? Why and how, please explain? I read the wiki page
but I don't see many people use it and I'm wondering why.
Whenever I add a tag, e.g. TAG (could be name, or amenity for example)
to a
On Wednesday 09 Sep 2009 2:40:49 am Anthony wrote:
Is it okay to use Google Street View to confirm turning restrictions,
street names, etc? This seems like an obvious yes to me, but then, I
would have said the same thing about tracing from a satellite photo, so I'm
not going to try to guess
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org wrote:
On Wednesday 09 Sep 2009 2:40:49 am Anthony wrote:
Is it okay to use Google Street View to confirm turning restrictions,
street names, etc? This seems like an obvious yes to me, but then, I
would have said the same
I didn't realize the imagery was opened up for world wide use. Last I heard,
it was only in the US.
-Eric
-=--=---===---=--=-=--=---==---=--=-=-
Eric B. WolfNew! 720-334-7734
USGS Geographer
Center of Excellence in GIScience
PhD Student
CU-Boulder - Geography
On
Google's forbids many things, but looking at an image and noting the
turn restrictions (or other content) that you can see within it is not
mentioned. Such a use is not covered by 2 (b) copy, translate,
modify, or make derivative works of the Content or any part thereof;
since the turn
David Earl wrote:
Richard - why do we still need this mode now you can save in
Potlatch and groups of changes fit much better with changesets
anyway?
Lots of people still prefer it. I've not seen any evidence of people
mistakenly selecting it - I think the big lightning bolt is pretty
On 9 Sep 2009, at 00:02, Ian Dees wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-
kbc.org wrote:
On Wednesday 09 Sep 2009 2:40:49 am Anthony wrote:
Is it okay to use Google Street View to confirm turning
restrictions,
street names, etc? This seems like an obvious yes
Thanks!
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 1:49 AM, Dave Stubbsd...@randomjunk.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:08 PM, maning
sambaleemmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
I already installed shapelib in ubunut jaunty and I still get the same error
python makeShapeColoured.py
On Wed, September 9, 2009 02:28, Ed Avis wrote:
Shouldn't the name tags in Seoul also be fixed a bit? Instead of a
Hangul name
followed by a Latin-alphabet name in brackets, wouldn't it be better to
tag name...@hangul and name...@latin separately?
Actually, the convention is that objects
Bob wrote:
Hi List,
The A57 and A607 edits below are incorrect to the best of my
knowledge.
Thanks for that. I'll have a go at undoing the A57 changes as time
permits (unless anyone beats me to it). I seem to recall reverting some
A607 changes (as part of reverting the fictitious
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Eric Wolf ebw...@gmail.com wrote:
not ok - if google has made a mistake (or an easter egg) and you
incorporate
that in OSM - we will all suffer.
How do you make a mistake with a picture of the real world?
Ever hear of Photoshop?
Map makers (and other
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Jonathan Bennett
openstreet...@jonno.cix.co.uk wrote:
David Muir Sharnoff wrote:
Google's forbids many things, but looking at an image and noting the
turn restrictions (or other content) that you can see within it is not
mentioned. Such a use is not covered
2009/9/8 Andrew Errington a.erring...@lancaster.ac.uk:
Could someone check, if they are realy there?
This is a side-effect of a bulk-upload. In Korea clinics and private
doctors are known as 'hospitals', as well as hospitals. At least, I think
so. They need to be changed to something other
On Wed, September 9, 2009 09:52, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
2009/9/8 Andrew Errington a.erring...@lancaster.ac.uk:
snip
By the way, I just requested the creation of a talk-ko mailing list,
but nothing's happening there yet (only a handful of mappers here!).
It seems a number of mappers have
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:04 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/9/9 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:26 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
it would be nice to tag things like GPS model, not just that it was
from a GPS, some models are
2009/9/9 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:26 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
it would be nice to tag things like GPS model, not just that it was
from a GPS, some models are better than others and so on and so forth.
In which case you ought to just upload the
On 08/09/2009, at 8:57 AM, Roy Wallace wrote:
For tagging highway=bus_stop 's, in addition to the existing
shelter=yes/no, I'm planning to also use bench=yes/no and
waste_basket=yes/no, as these features are often installed as part
of the bus stop itself, in Brisbane.
Tagging separate
On 03/09/2009, at 9:02 PM, John Smith wrote:
2009/9/3 James Livingston doc...@mac.com:
* What exactly does commercial mapping entity mean for the purposes
of 4?
It's very clear if something has not for profit status based on their
governing rules.
While it's quite clear what commercial
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:43 PM, James Livingston doc...@mac.com wrote:
I've been doing that for a while (well, except waste_basket=*), so
that's a +1 from me :)
Any objections (from anyone) to adding these to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop ?
Estou curioso pra saber como esses caras usaram osm + Google Maps . . .
http://blog.monopolycitystreets.com/2009/09/almost-there.html
--
Rodrigo de Avila
Analista de Desenvolvimento
+55 51 9733.3488 • rodr...@avila.eti.br • www.avila.eti.br
___
Acabei de receber essa aí tb...
Muitíssimo curioso, tomara que dê pra jogar com ruas de qualquer país...
_
From: talk-br-boun...@openstreetmap.org
[mailto:talk-br-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Rodrigo de Avila
Sent: terça-feira, 8 de setembro de 2009 17:25
To: OSM
Am Dienstag 08 September 2009 schrieb Ulf Lamping:
Ich habe mir jetzt deine gesamte Argumentation des Threads nochmal
durchgelesen und konnte leider *kein* sachliches Argument finden, warum
die Trennung von normaler und Modellflug Piste eine gute oder
schlechte Idee ist!
dann solltest du
Karl Eichwalder schrieb:
Markus liste12a4...@gmx.de writes:
Geht sowas auch mit OSM?
Wie?
Wo im Wiki beschrieben?
Dafür gibt es unzählige Anwendungsmöglichkeiten...
Nur so am rande. Diese raeder hier stehen immer nur auf belebten
plaetzen herum und dort zumeist irgendwie als
Moin,
Guenther Meyer schrieb:
Am Montag 07 September 2009 schrieb Pascal Neis:
wie bereits Carsten geschrieben hat, nur bei Fussgaenger und Bicycle.
wobei ich gerade denke, dass man tracks auch ruhig notfalls dazu
verwenden kann mit dem Auto darüber zu fahren (wenn nichts anderes
Guenther Meyer schrieb:
Am Dienstag 08 September 2009 schrieb Ulf Lamping:
Das einzige was ich gefunden habe war - wieder mal - das es auf dem
Garmin (dann nicht) gerendert wird.
DAS ist definitiv kein argument.
Na, da sind wir doch mal zusammen.
Und die Sachlage hier sieht eben so aus
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 08:00:05AM +0200, Guenther Meyer wrote:
Am Dienstag 08 September 2009 schrieb Florian Lohoff:
Ich denke ein router sollte an jedem weg ein implizites Anlieger Frei
sehen, so das in jedem fall jeder weg benutzt wird an dem auch das Ziel
liegt. Es gibt nunmal keine
Hi!
Weil wir ein paar Vorfälle in der letzten Zeit hatten, habe ich eine
Wiki Seite erstellt:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Detect_Vandalism
Natürlich haben wir im Moment noch nicht allzuviele Werkzeuge, aber wir
haben sie. Also nutzt sie!
Die Seite listet auch einige Ideen, wie man das
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 09:04:18PM +0200, Jan Tappenbeck wrote:
ich hatte mir bei der Frage eigentlich gedacht, dass eine solche
eMail-Adresse ansprechender ist als nur Kontakt oder Info@ und da sich
dieses zielgerichteter äußert.
Ansprechender schon, aber wenn man dann keine Antwort
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 09:18:34AM +0200, Ulf Lamping wrote:
Und die Sachlage hier sieht eben so aus dass ein separater Tag für
Modellflugzeuglandebahnen die Gesamtlage für Landebahnen
nicht wirklich sauber klären würde.
Was soll der Renderer also tun, der zwischen normalen und Modellflug
Moin,
ich meine, die Färbung der GPX Tracks nach Geschwindigkeit hätte
mal funktioniert. Momentan (v1997) sind aber alle Tracks
in der gleichen Farbe. Oder funktioniert das nur mit
lokalen GPX Tracks ?
Grüße
Chris
___
Talk-de mailing list
Guenther Meyer schrieb:
doch, die wurden genannt, und teilweise auch diskutiert:
z.B. laenge, breite, belag, ausrichtung, widmung, ...
inkl. einem vorschlag von mir, wie man das taggen koennte.
Ah, was ich doch noch weiter unten im Thread von dir gefunden habe ist:
aeroway = runway
Chris-Hein Lunkhusen schrieb:
Moin,
ich meine, die Färbung der GPX Tracks nach Geschwindigkeit hätte
mal funktioniert. Momentan (v1997) sind aber alle Tracks
in der gleichen Farbe. Oder funktioniert das nur mit
lokalen GPX Tracks ?
Wieso probierst du das mit den lokalen GPX Tracks nicht
Hallo
Am Freitag, 4. September 2009 00:53:57 schrieb Garry:
Johann H. Addicks schrieb:
Zumindest wäre deren Nutzung sicher eine Motivation, TurnRestrictions
und Hausnummern zu mappen.
...und maxspeed wenn die das mit der Anzeige funktionieren würde.
Oder gibt es inzwischen eine Garmin
Ulf Lamping schrieb:
ich meine, die Färbung der GPX Tracks nach Geschwindigkeit hätte
mal funktioniert. Momentan (v1997) sind aber alle Tracks
in der gleichen Farbe. Oder funktioniert das nur mit
lokalen GPX Tracks ?
Wieso probierst du das mit den lokalen GPX Tracks nicht einfach mal aus,
Wolfgang schrieb:
Garmin Colorado 300 mit aktuellem Update zeigt in Klammern die Maxspeed oben
auf dem Display an, so in OSM vorhanden.
Das geht auch mit einem Etrex. Einfach die Funktion Führungstext
wählen und wenn der Straßenname nicht zu lang ist sieht man auch
den maxspeed.
Chris
geo.osm schrieb:
er wird nicht allen deinen Anforderungen gerecht, aber schau dir doch
mal den OSMtracker an. Geht auf fast jedes Navi rauf und wenn du nen
eingebautes Mikrofon hast, dann kannst du auch gleich
Sprachaufzeichnungen machen. Das ganze ist dann so konzipiert, das es
gleich
Am Di, 8.09.2009, 09:54 schrieb Gary68:
Wenn ich den richtigen Ansatz finde, werde ich vielleicht etwas in der
Richtung programmieren.
Vllt. was ganz Simples:
Wenn einzelne oder zusammenhängende Nodes schlagartig um mehr als 30 Meter
verschoben oder stark umbenannt werden?!
1 - 100 of 240 matches
Mail list logo
