jhabijan wrote:
Koje bi sve POI (Point Of Interest) interesantne za turiste trebalo stavit na
gradsku kartu?
hvala,
joža
benzinske
bolnice (doktor, zubar u manjim mjestima)
policija
muzeji...
u biti sve sto ide s amenity im je interesantno :)
Marc Coevoet wrote:
Hi,
Since 1 oct, Egbos is available (is the EU variant of the GPS system).
It is not (the EU variant of the GPS system).
It is an augmentation system for the existing GPS system.
Would it be an idea to mail
Mr Antonio Tajani, European Commission Vice-President for
Hi,
(for those on dev; this started out as a discussion on whether or not we
want to put any legal/license restrictions on external users linking to
OSM objects for identification, e.g. a restaurant guide saying this pub
is OSM node #12345)
Matt Amos wrote:
i would hope so too, as it makes
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Andrew Turner
ajtur...@highearthorbit.com wrote:
On 2 Oct 2009, at 18:06, Matt Amos wrote:
hi legals,
i've come across a couple of interesting questions / use-cases for the
ODbL and wider discussion. it basically reduces to whether we want the
ODbL to have
Matt Amos wrote:
as a concrete example, let's pretend i have a site, beerintheOSM,
which rates pubs and allows commenting and photo uploads. if i'm
storing the reviews linked against pubs linked against OSM
(name/location/ID), i definitely have to release the
(name/location/ID) records -
Hi,
no-one is suggesting that the extraction of names, locations and IDs
would be somehow outside of the ODbL. any site using these as lookup
keys would have to release that data under the ODbL.
[...]
as a concrete example, let's pretend i have a site, beerintheOSM,
which rates pubs and
2009/10/6 Matt Amos zerebub...@gmail.com:
as a concrete example, let's pretend i have a site, beerintheOSM,
which rates pubs and allows commenting and photo uploads. if i'm
storing the reviews linked against pubs linked against OSM
(name/location/ID), i definitely have to release the
Dear legal-talk,
I wonder if either cc-by-sa, or ODbL anticipate a reciprocal data
agreement between OSM and another project with a different license?
Imagine a data provider using perhaps cc-by, or a BSD style permissive
license contributes their data to OSM.
Imagine then that they would like
Richard,
Richard Weait wrote:
Imagine a data provider using perhaps cc-by, or a BSD style permissive
license contributes their data to OSM.
Imagine then that they would like to monitor changes in OSM to data
that originated from their source.
Imagine then that they would like to incorporate
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:17:37 +1000, John Smith wrote:
I thought this was anything goes, why are you dictating something can't
be done?
I'm also puzzled why it can't be done by a comitee elected BY OSM
mappers?!? Why not?
--
pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:29:30 -0400, Russ Nelson wrote:
That's okay, too. What I want, what I REALLY want, is for SteveC to be
able to exercise leadership without being told that he's evil for doing
so.
Why only him? Let's choose a few people we all trust and let them come to
a agreement.
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:33:40 +0100, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_bureaucracy
for what Another Plaice thinks of that idea.
Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy, but you can't start writing nonsense or
material that is not
On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 16:22:08 -0500, ouɐɯnH wrote:
This is any multi language funny poster for OSM. enjoy
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Image:Poster_osm.jpg
salu2
Humano
Great and funny poster, I love it.
Could we get also sources for the poster in Inkscape format so we can
On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:52:40 +, Valent Turkovic wrote:
Great and funny poster, I love it.
Also it would be great to setup a Promote OSM wiki page with different
posters, flyers and similar accessories that other OSM mappers could use
for mapping parties or for promoting OSM in their
2009/10/6 Valent Turkovic valent.turko...@gmail.com:
On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:52:40 +, Valent Turkovic wrote:
Great and funny poster, I love it.
Also it would be great to setup a Promote OSM wiki page with different
posters, flyers and similar accessories that other OSM mappers could use
Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy, but you can't start writing nonsense or
material that is not encyclopedia type texts. For example you can't
start writing manuals there, you will be kicked out right away.
That's *exactly the same* problem though.
Who decides what is encyclopedic or nonsense?
the one that I tend to use is at
http://svn.openstreetmap.org/misc/pr_material/recruitment_poster/poster.pdfhttp://short.ie/osmposter
k.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Valent Turkovic
valent.turko...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:52:40 +, Valent Turkovic wrote:
Great and
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Gervase Markham gerv-gm...@gerv.net wrote:
On 05/10/09 11:04, Dave Stubbs wrote:
As the person whose first came up with a no-names map for London
(well, actually it was a named map of London, turned into a nonames
map on SteveC's suggestion), I have an *official
Hi,
I have written a small command-line-tool mainly for extracting specific
tracks together wit its way-points out of a large gpx-file. I use it to
get the tracks from one day out of my always growing Current.gpx (Garmin
nüvi 550).
Download and Documentation:
Thanks to those who responded to this thread. Advice gratefully received.
There seems to be a clear majority preference for option (b) - the more
detailed approach that avoids superimposing boundaries of areas (and their
nodes) on an adjacent way (and its nodes). I fully understand the two
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Ken Guest k...@linux.ie wrote:
the one that I tend to use is at
http://svn.openstreetmap.org/misc/pr_material/recruitment_poster/poster.pdf
k.
Same question; is the source file available for editing and
translation? Or at least clipart objects so I can
Mike N. schrieb:
The delay in rendering is irritating but understandable. A sandbox with a
limit of a view ways/areas to allow immediate render would be extremely
useful.
I read somewhere today that someone is working on this - a web site where
you'll be able to designate a bounding
On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 13:02:30 +0200, Valent Turkovic wrote:
Same question; is the source file available for editing and translation?
Found the sources in: http://svn.openstreetmap.org/misc/pr_material/
recruitment_poster/
Thanks!
--
pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt
On 05/10/2009, at 7:54 PM, David Earl wrote:
* Three new primitives, tagkey for describing the k part of tags,
tagvalue for the v part of tags and tagdescription separated off to
allow for multiple descriptions in multiple languages without having
to
download all the data for languages
On 2 Oct 2009, at 18:06, Matt Amos wrote:
hi legals,
i've come across a couple of interesting questions / use-cases for the
ODbL and wider discussion. it basically reduces to whether we want the
ODbL to have viral (GPL-like) behaviour, or whether it should be less
viral (LGPL-like). we've
On 05/10/2009, at 8:18 PM, Marc Schütz wrote:
IMO (a) is the correct way to do this.
...
For a road, we can either choose to map it as a linear object (this
is the common case), or we can map its geometry more exactly by
using an area. In both cases, however, the object in our database
On 06/10/2009 13:35, James Livingston wrote:
I can see things getting ickier than they are now if you can just go
around adding new shop= values, without having some prior discussion
to what it means. If I saw a suggested option in an editor, I would
generally assume that there is some
On 06/10/2009, at 10:58 PM, David Earl wrote:
On 06/10/2009 13:35, James Livingston wrote:
I can see things getting ickier than they are now if you can just
go around adding new shop= values, without having some prior
discussion to what it means. If I saw a suggested option in an
2009/10/6 James Livingston doc...@mac.com:
On 05/10/2009, at 8:18 PM, Marc Schütz wrote:
IMO (a) is the correct way to do this.
...
For a road, we can either choose to map it as a linear object (this
is the common case), or we can map its geometry more exactly by
using an area. In both
Valent Turkovic writes:
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:17:37 +1000, John Smith wrote:
I thought this was anything goes, why are you dictating something can't
be done?
I'm also puzzled why it can't be done by a comitee elected BY OSM
mappers?!? Why not?
It could ... but that committee
Dave Stubbs writes:
I was convinced otherwise by some very persuasive arguments and now
think it's completely not worth doing and not at all important.
I'm not convinced. Could you share them?
--
--my blog is athttp://blog.russnelson.com
Crynwr supports open source software
521
On 06/10/2009 14:09, John Smith wrote:
Some people are marking the landuse hard up against roads, but this
isn't correct since the property boundary never touches any roads, at
least none that I'm aware of, and foot paths etc use the same land use
area as roads.
I keep adjacent areas
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:52 AM, Valent Turkovic
valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 16:22:08 -0500, ouɐɯnH wrote:
This is any multi language funny poster for OSM. enjoy
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Image:Poster_osm.jpg
salu2
Humano
Great and funny poster, I love
Marc Schütz wrote:
IMO (a) is the correct way to do this.
We are trying to represent reality in our database.
I'm not sure that's true. A map is a representation of reality, not
reality itself. With the tools available to us at the moment attaining
reality is a lot of work For instance the
2009/10/6 David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com:
On 06/10/2009 14:09, John Smith wrote:
Some people are marking the landuse hard up against roads, but this
isn't correct since the property boundary never touches any roads, at
least none that I'm aware of, and foot paths etc use the same land
On 06/10/2009, at 11:30 PM, Matt Amos wrote:
so far, all the responses seem to indicate that everyone thinks
linking to OSM data by ID is OK. what about Andy's idea, though? is it
OK to take a location, name and possibly an ID as well to perform
fuzzy linking?
my view is that all the
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Marc Schütz wrote:
IMO (a) is the correct way to do this.
We are trying to represent reality in our database.
I'm not sure that's true. A map is a representation of reality, not
reality itself.
True, but the
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
With the tools available to us at the moment attaining
reality is a lot of work For instance the majority of mappers don't draw
an area for, lets say, an
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
Dave Stubbs writes:
I was convinced otherwise by some very persuasive arguments and now
think it's completely not worth doing and not at all important.
I'm not convinced. Could you share them?
a) what are you actually
2009/10/7 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Most sidewalks pretty much meet that criterion, and roads sort of meet it
(not at intersections, though).
There is a landuse area around roads that isn't part of surrounding
property boundaries.
___
talk mailing list
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:21 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/10/7 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Most sidewalks pretty much meet that criterion, and roads sort of meet it
(not at intersections, though).
There is a landuse area around roads that isn't part of surrounding
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:55 PM, James Livingston doc...@mac.com wrote:
On 06/10/2009, at 11:30 PM, Matt Amos wrote:
so far, all the responses seem to indicate that everyone thinks
linking to OSM data by ID is OK. what about Andy's idea, though? is it
OK to take a location, name and possibly an
Mike Harris wrote:
Thanks to those who responded to this thread. Advice gratefully received.
There seems to be a clear majority preference for option (b)
- the more detailed approach that avoids superimposing boundaries
of areas (and their nodes) on an adjacent way (and its nodes).
I fully
Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com
mailto:dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Marc Schütz wrote:
IMO (a) is the correct way to do this.
We are trying to represent reality in our database.
I'm not sure that's true. A map is a
Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org
mailto:o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com
mailto:dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
With the tools available to us at the moment attaining
reality is
2009/10/7 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:21 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/10/7 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Most sidewalks pretty much meet that criterion, and roads sort of meet
it
(not at intersections, though).
There is a landuse area around
While we're talking about GPX I recently published a script to load
GPX files in a postgis database. It's convenient to show a long trace
on top of a map for instance.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Pov/gpx2postgis
Yann
Le 6 oct. 2009 à 12:32, Ingo Lantschner a écrit :
Hi,
I
I have a Garmin unit and from the factory WAAS/EGNOS support was set to 'off'.
I turned it on recently. I see little 'D' symbols sometimes appear in
satellite status but I haven't seen the promised 1 metre precision so far.
--
Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com
Igor Brejc igor.brejc at gmail.com writes:
For days now I've been trying to figure out how I could render borders
between England, Wales and Scotland using OSM data,
1. Borders between these countries are tagged with the same
admin_level=4 as that of subdivisions inside England
Gervase Markham wrote:
So why did you make the noname map in the first place, if it's not
important? Have you changed your mind about its usefulness?
It's useful *as a guide*, or a tool. What some people seem to be unable
to grasp is that *it's OK for a road to appear in red on NoNames*. You
Another new mailing list has been created: annou...@openstreetmap.org
You can subscribe here:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/announce
Announce is a moderated list limited to announcements about OSM
services, new software versions and any other really, really important
news that affects
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:56 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/10/7 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:21 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/10/7 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Most sidewalks pretty much meet that criterion, and roads sort
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
The only way I can see doing that is when the landuse area is *also* a
highway area.
And then, only if you're sure that's what you want to do. If you have two
pedestrian areas separated by a highway, and you use the highway as a
On 06/10/09 15:18, Dave Stubbs wrote:
a) what are you actually marking?
- no name in OSM -- we know that already
- the mapper didn't find a name -- so we shouldn't check again?
Probably not, no. Just as when a mapper adds a postbox, someone else
doesn't think he's added a postbox. I
On 06/10/09 05:37, John Smith wrote:
It sounds like he made it to see which roads needed surveying to
acquire their name, however I'm still confused why people use
noname=yes when the street does have a name but not a street sign, as
I posted before there is actually a few streets near here on
Chris
Despite the well-argued views of a minority, I am persuaded by the equally
well-argued views of the (considerable) majority who favour option (b).
That is not to say that there isn't room for using a bit of common sense! I
wouldn't divide up Delamere Forest into individual areas bounded
On 06/10/09 16:49, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
It's useful *as a guide*, or a tool. What some people seem to be unable
to grasp is that *it's OK for a road to appear in red on NoNames*. You
don't have to eliminate them completely. It's just a guide, not a gospel.
A road appearing in red means that
Yes - I think Anthony makes the case very well and gives a clearer response
to Chris than I did!
I think the distinction between landuse=forest (where the tracks - and even
roads - are normally regarded as part of the forest) and some of the other
landuse= is sensible. I also agree that there is
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Gervase Markham gerv-gm...@gerv.net wrote:
On 06/10/09 15:18, Dave Stubbs wrote:
a) what are you actually marking?
- no name in OSM -- we know that already
- the mapper didn't find a name -- so we shouldn't check again?
Probably not, no. Just as when a
2009/10/7 Gervase Markham gerv-gm...@gerv.net:
On 06/10/09 16:49, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
It's useful *as a guide*, or a tool. What some people seem to be unable
to grasp is that *it's OK for a road to appear in red on NoNames*. You
don't have to eliminate them completely. It's just a guide,
2009/10/7 Gervase Markham gerv-gm...@gerv.net:
On 06/10/09 05:37, John Smith wrote:
It sounds like he made it to see which roads needed surveying to
acquire their name, however I'm still confused why people use
noname=yes when the street does have a name but not a street sign, as
I posted
The regional development agencies have quite big budgets, actually. But I'd
agree that England needs to have it's own level.
Richard
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Igor Brejc igor.brejc at gmail.com writes:
For days now I've been trying to figure out how I
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Mike Harris mik...@googlemail.com wrote:
This suggests that the area tag might even be landuse=highway!
Hey, I could go for that. I've already clearly separated the meaning of the
term highway when dealing with OSM from the meaning of the term highway
that I'd
2009/10/6 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
Yes and keep it to yourself, don't bother telling anyone else since
they really want to waste their time finding out there is no name,a
after the 10th person does this I'm sure someone has a right to be
upset.
If you have 10 people in the same
2009/10/6 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com:
The regional development agencies have quite big budgets, actually. But I'd
agree that England needs to have it's own level.
I think admin_level=5 and an update to the wiki might be the best move.
Peter.
2009/10/7 DavidD thewi...@gmail.com:
2009/10/6 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
Yes and keep it to yourself, don't bother telling anyone else since
they really want to waste their time finding out there is no name,a
after the 10th person does this I'm sure someone has a right to be
Why not - it seems as good as any other idea - of course someone is going to
object (;) but ...
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: dipie...@gmail.com [mailto:dipie...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Anthony
Sent: 06 October 2009 19:03
To: Mike Harris
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Jonathan Bennett wrote:
Another new mailing list has been created: annou...@openstreetmap.org
You can subscribe here:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/announce
Announce is a moderated list limited to announcements about OSM
services, new software versions and any other really,
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Dave F. wrote:
I welcome this addition.
To keep this low volume and to facilitate discussion on the subjects of
the posts in the correct place, would it be conducive if the senders
recommend an appropriate forum, maybe even starting a discussion thread
in said forum?
It's
Gervase Markham wrote:
On 06/10/09 15:18, Dave Stubbs wrote:
a) what are you actually marking?
- no name in OSM -- we know that already
- the mapper didn't find a name -- so we shouldn't check again?
Probably not, no. Just as when a mapper adds a postbox, someone else
doesn't
Tagging: landuse=highway
Applies-to: area
Definition: an area of land set aside for public use in transportation
Land which is set aside for public use as a roadway, footway,
cycleway, etc. The actual road or path may or may not have already
been built. This tag should not be used for areas of
Im forwarding this to the tagg...@openstreetmap.org list
for discussions.
Cheers,
Sam
-- Forwarded message --
From: Anthony o...@inbox.org
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 19:58:03 -0400
Subject: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - landuse=highway
To: openstreetmap
Sorry, I forgot the URL:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/highway
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Sam Vekemans
acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com wrote:
Im forwarding this to the tagg...@openstreetmap.org list
for discussions.
Cheers,
Sam
-- Forwarded message
2009/10/7 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
The more uploaded GPX traces/checks of a route the better. Surely?
It would be more useful to know what created the traces also, some
units are bound to be better than others and knowing this you would be
able to weight the tracks rather than treat them
Philip Homburg wrote:
Ik zou in moeilijke gevallen gewoon alle huisnummers individueel taggen.
Dat is ook het uiteindelijke doel. De interpolatielijnen zijn bedacht
als tijdelijke oplossing, totdat elk huis individueel is gemapt. Dat
laatste is echter stukken makkelijker en sneller te doen in
In your letter dated Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:03:44 +0200 (CEST) you wrote:
individueel taggen gaat niet lukken want het probleem is dat sommige
huizen in die straten dus 2 nummers hebben. ze staan ook echt beide op de
deuren.
Je kan dan toch twee nodes vlak naast elkaar maken voor die twee nummers?
++ 06/10/09 15:03 +0200 - Floris Looijesteijn:
ik blijf voor de normale straten voorlopig geloven in de interpolatielijnen.
het kan mij echt niet boeien waar een huis precies is, 100 meter is goed
genoeg. je kunt in de steden toch bijna nooit voor de deur parkeren.
[...]
Hoe wel ik denk ik iets
de 100 meter nauwkeurigheid was een wilde gok aan de hand van de langste
straten die ik tot nu toe heb ingevoerd en de ranges van huisnummers.
ik probeer ook zo nauwkeurig mogelijk te werken bij het invoeren maar als
ik met de auto aan kom rijden is binnen 100 meter van het huisnummer
beland voor
Quoting Philip Homburg pch-osm-tal...@u-1.phicoh.com:
In your letter dated Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:03:44 +0200 (CEST) you wrote:
individueel taggen gaat niet lukken want het probleem is dat sommige
huizen in die straten dus 2 nummers hebben. ze staan ook echt beide op de
deuren.
Je kan dan toch
Quoting Rejo Zenger osm-talk...@subs.krikkit.nl:
De Map features page vermeldt het volgende voor huisnummers: The house
number (may contain non-digits). If a single entry has multiple house
numbers, separate them by ,. e.g. 12b,12c. Only required key for
an address (except when addr:housename
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Rik de Landloper schreef:
Ik vind het zelf het leukste / zinvolste om puur de fysieke
eigenschappen van wegen en paden in OSM te mappen. Om alle bordjes en
paaltjes met ingewikkelde coderingen te gaan noteren, zie ik de lol niet
echt van in.
On Tuesday 06 October 2009 23:40:25 Rik de Landloper wrote:
een dienst genaamd
routeyou
http://www.routeyou.com
die die dit als ik het goed zie onder een CC-licentie doet:
http://www.routeyou.com/page/view/23/terms-of-use.nl
Bovenaan die pagina:
RouteYou grants you permission to display,
On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:12 +0200, Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Rik de Landloper schreef:
Ik vind het zelf het leukste / zinvolste om puur de fysieke
eigenschappen van wegen en paden in OSM te mappen. Om alle bordjes en
Rik de Landloper wrote:
Hallo,
Ik ga komend weekend in Twente wandelen en ben mijn route aan het
voorbereiden. Ik kwam op de wiki de wandelroutes-pagina tegen:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Nederland_Wandelroutes
Hierdoor kwam ik op het spoor van het wandelroutenetwerk in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Rik de Landloper schreef:
Pas op wat je zegt. Als ik die helm opzet, dan zet ik zo een hele
batterij OSM-ers aan het editen, terwijl ik lekker buiten loop te
struinen. Wat zullen we vandaag eens gaan taggen, hmm ... grassprietjes
?
En je helpt
2009/10/7 Frank Steggink stegg...@steggink.org:
Helaas kunnen wij niet zomaar die informatie overnemen. Ze gebruiken wel
CC, maar niet onder de share-alike versie. Dit is minimaal vereist om in
OSM te hergebruiken. Verder melden ze bovenin al dat het alleen voor
niet-comercieel gebruik is, en
Frank en Cortinus bedankt voor de attentie op het ontbreken van SA.
Wat je wel zou kunnen doen is hen aanschrijven met de vraag of ze hun
data wel aan OpenStreetMap ter beschikking willen stellen. Ik kan niet
inschatten of ze hiervoor open zouden staan, maar niet geschoten is
altijd mis.
Andre Engels wrote:
2009/10/7 Frank Steggink stegg...@steggink.org:
Helaas kunnen wij niet zomaar die informatie overnemen. Ze gebruiken wel
CC, maar niet onder de share-alike versie. Dit is minimaal vereist om in
OSM te hergebruiken. Verder melden ze bovenin al dat het alleen voor
Frank Steggink wrote:
Andre Engels wrote:
2009/10/7 Frank Steggink stegg...@steggink.org:
Helaas kunnen wij niet zomaar die informatie overnemen. Ze gebruiken wel
CC, maar niet onder de share-alike versie. Dit is minimaal vereist om in
OSM te hergebruiken. Verder melden ze
2009/10/6 Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com:
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:32:49 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Lake Gairdner and Lake Torrens are natural=coastline
Well there both now natural=water as they are both single ways less than 1000
nodes and there's no need for them to
I just updated all the world boundaries and shore lines etc on
maps.bigtincan.com and this is the dates of files:
-rw-r--r-- 1 1001 1001 3461233 Mar 10 2007 builtup_area.dbf
-rw-r--r-- 1 1001 1001279020 Mar 10 2007 builtup_area.index
-rw-r--r-- 1 1001 1001 513 Mar 10 2007
G'day all,
Any chance folks could take some conversations offline, or batch up their 15
emails into a single email? I presume I'm not the only one who has pretty well
stopped paying any real attention to the talk-au list because its carrying on
like a Twitter feed.
2009/10/6 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Jeff Price wrote:
G'day all,
Any chance folks could take some conversations offline, or batch up their
15 emails into a single email? I presume I'm not the only one who has
pretty well stopped paying any real attention to the talk-au list
On 06/10/2009, at 2:12 PM, John Smith wrote:
Lake Eyre etc is so big they used natural=coastline... Although this
comes back to the question the other day, where does the coastline
start/end, legally speaking it cuts across bays, it doesn't go round
them or up rivers...
I looked into this a
On 05/10/2009, at 3:59 PM, Ross Scanlon wrote:
So PLEASE look at the sat photos and already entered data before you
go removing the coastline and using the ABS data automatically as
the coastline.
As a +1 comment, I'd also like to note that in many places the ABS
follow the
2009/10/6 James Livingston doc...@mac.com:
On 06/10/2009, at 2:12 PM, John Smith wrote:
Lake Eyre etc is so big they used natural=coastline... Although this
comes back to the question the other day, where does the coastline
start/end, legally speaking it cuts across bays, it doesn't go round
For OSM purposes (as opposed to general mapping) the answer should not
be complicated. If at high tide you drive into the water, you have
driven over a functional coast into the sea... :)
Of course, this won't work for mariners and lawyers... :)
My favourite estuary is the Fly River in PNG. It
On 06/10/2009, at 11:37 PM, Jim Croft wrote:
Of course, this won't work for mariners and lawyers... :)
No, but there are (proposed) tags to indicate the low-tide mark, and
the OpenSeaMap guys might have something for other various maritime
boundaries.
My favourite estuary is the Fly River
I forget who mentioned about some 15m error that was fixed in the
property boundary data, but I actually found another error, is there
some where we should report these errors?
It looks like the road was realigned, the previous road was turned
into a car park and the property boundary for the
Has anyone had success using a GPS unit inside a metal railway carriage
to map a railway line?
I notice that parts of the main line between Sydney and Melbourne are
missing, eg:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-34.7446lon=147.886zoom=14layers=B000FTF
I'd consider doing the trip on the XPT
1 - 100 of 275 matches
Mail list logo
