On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) te...@teddy.ch wrote:
On 12/29/2010 12:30 AM, Richard Mann wrote:
If someone maps a single node on the way and calls it
highway=bus_stop, then that should be OK (but not recommended).
unified_stoparea recommends that. You would allow
Hi maning,
The percentages are an increase from the 2010-11-25 stats?
If yes, then there are a lot of discrepancies. For example for nodes:
1,528,760 / 1,435,281 - 1 = 6.5%, not 9%
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:25 AM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
Here, in parenthesis is the %
Doh! I had a hunch that I mistakenly posted the wrong percentages
(blame it on ooo calc). Apologies.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi maning,
The percentages are an increase from the 2010-11-25 stats?
If yes, then there are a lot of
Le 24/12/2010 12:25, Rob a écrit :
Also did some 'electrifying' work in very different regions
Same here for Nijlen and region.
Did some around liege, while connecting the dutch and belgium power grid
___
Talk-be mailing list
I bingingfying here
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.71948lon=3.60882zoom=15layers=M
From: talk-be-requ...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Talk-be Digest, Vol 37, Issue 1
To: talk-be@openstreetmap.org
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 12:00:03 +
Send Talk-be mailing list submissions to
On 04.01.2011 08:53, Steve Bennett wrote:
The OSMF board mandates the LWG to enforce mandatory acceptance of the
CT and ODBL in order to edit the database by March 31st.
Have I misunderstood the situation, or is that pretty much the size of
it: on April 1st, all Nearmap-derived data (and
On 4 January 2011 18:40, Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.de wrote:
you misunderstood. After 31st March you have to mandatory agree to CT in
order to continue to EDIT.
eg: After this date no NEW nearmap data could be inserted unless compatible
with CT.
Which brings up the other point of
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:11 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 January 2011 01:02, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
But you are right in that there is a weakness because people are not
guaranteed a right
Hi,
On 01/04/11 16:02, Anthony wrote:
But what could we do?
Let people remove their data if they don't agree to future licensing
terms.
No, that is not acceptable to me. Someone who participates in OSM must
have the willingness to accept what the majority wants, or else they
should not
Rob Myers wrote:
On 04/01/11 15:05, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
OS OpenData is AIUI compatible with ODbL and the latest Contributor
Terms.
[citation needed]
(http://fandomania.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/xfiles1.jpg)
:)
I keep meaning to sit down and write a long blog post about this.
==
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Such an opt-out clause
would mean: We're not a community building something together, we're a pot
where everyone can temporarily put their personal contribution but remove it
at any time.
On the rest, we're going to
Hi,
On 01/04/11 15:17, John Smith wrote:
Or better yet, change active contributor to active participant and
include things like genuine mailing list posts or wiki edits or ...
rather than restricting interested parties to only those who can
edit...
I think that would be perfectly ok, albeit
On 5 January 2011 01:49, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
As it happens OS is planning to move to the Open Government Licence, and
this has an explicit compatibility clause with any ODC attribution licence.
(It also has sane guidance on attribution, e.g. If it is not practical to
On 5 January 2011 01:54, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I think that would be perfectly ok, albeit perhaps hard to define. (For
example the evil OSMF could change the license on the Wiki so that Joe the
would-be contributor cannot, for his moral reasons, participate on the Wiki
any
Anthony wrote:
Let people remove their data if they don't agree to future licensing
terms.
It's my impression that this statement reflects the fundamental
philosophical reason why you seem to disagree with all versions of the
Contributor Terms so far: You insist on the idea of individual data
On 5 January 2011 02:16, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
I believe that this underlying spirit of the Contributor Terms fits the
reality of OSM. Already today, there's hardly a way I've created or
That's not the impression I get, take this comment for example:
John Smith wrote:
That might work for ODBL which has attribution requirements, although
if produced works are exempt from attribution requirements
They're not. ODbL 4.3 requires attribution on produced works.
and the CT allows for license changes to non-attribution licenses
It doesn't. CT 4
On 4 January 2011 15:49, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Rob Myers wrote:
On 04/01/11 15:05, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
OS OpenData is AIUI compatible with ODbL and the latest Contributor
Terms.
[citation needed]
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
Anthony wrote:
Let people remove their data if they don't agree to future licensing
terms.
It's my impression that this statement reflects the fundamental
philosophical reason why you seem to disagree with all versions
- Original Message -
From: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 4:48 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CTs and the 1 April deadline
John Smith wrote:
Thanks for the clarification. In your opinion, what would be
- Original Message -
From: Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.de
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 6:08 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CTs and the 1 April deadline
Peter Miller writes:
I will currently be
- Original Message -
From: John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CTs and the 1 April deadline
On 5 January 2011 04:08, Stephan Knauss
Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
ODbL 4.3 requires that the source database be attributed, not any
data sources that went into making that database.
As I said, to understand the attribution chain in ODbL, I find it helpful
to consider OSM as a Derivative Database of OS OpenData (i.e. Extracting
I wrote:
As I said, to understand the attribution chain in ODbL, I find it
helpful
to consider OSM as a Derivative Database of OS OpenData (i.e.
Extracting or Re-utilising the whole or a Substantial part of the
Contents in a new Database).
To take the example given in ODbL 4.3a,
On 4 January 2011 17:53, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
My first question is: which version of the CT is referred to there?
Does this mean the totally broken v1.0, the partially broken proposed
v1.2.2, or some hopefully non-broken v1.3?
I haven't been keeping track of this
part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20110104/a6dee22c/attachment.html
--
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http
part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20110104/a6dee22c/attachment.html
--
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http
+1 for osmand. They are pretty active.
2011/1/4 Frank Fesevur f...@users.sourceforge.net:
2011/1/4 nicholas.g.lawre...@tmr.qld.gov.au:
Is there an Android OS app for osm?
When you want to use your phone for mapping, you should definitily not
forget OSMTracker.
Searching for osm in the
GPSmid is a very good vector based osm programm for symbian mobile phones.
You can use it to display the map (offline), log a track, add notices,
simple online editing and offline routing.
Ciao André
2011/1/3 Jeremy Stocks jeremyl...@yahoo.com
Hi there,
+
I'm a newbie to OSM but and oldie
Hi all,
I pushed a new version of the Bing Imagery Analyzer to dev.
http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bing/
Highlights:
* Fixed a bug that reported one zoomlevel less than is actually there.
* Transparency slider.
* The underlying tile.php now also supports TMS-type requests for easy
I still haven't found a proper free, offline, country-level OSM app for my S60
3rd phone.
What I do use is We-Travel (www.we-travel.biz) - which does all that (including
routing and voice navigation), however it certainly does have its own quirks
therefore I can't quite call it proper.
- Max
I'm using mainly gpsmid on my e51 - does offline (vector) maps, can do
basic edits online, navigation, collects cellids, maps are
customizable using styles - what else should i want? on the other
hand.. you can't really go country-level without sacrificing some map
features.
jose
On Tue, Jan 4,
Updated and colour differentiated:
http://www.stevechilton.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/osm/buildingsBing.png
Cheers
STEVE
-Original Message-
From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On
Behalf Of Steve Chilton
Sent: 23 December 2010 00:23
To:
Interested in mapping and transport?
See details below of a conference this July - 'User Issues in Geospatial Public
Transport Information'
www.univie.ac.at/icacomuse
Cheers
STEVE
-Original Message-
From: David Forrest [mailto:david.forr...@glasgow.ac.uk]
Sent: 20 December 2010 12:35
At 2011-01-04 02:43, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Hi all, I pushed a new version of the Bing Imagery Analyzer to dev.
http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bing/ Highlights: * Fixed a bug that
reported one zoomlevel less than is actually there. * Transparency slider.
* The underlying tile.php now
On 04/01/2011 02:52, Anthony wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Dave F.dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Being curious in return, why are you curious?
Well, he does work for Microsoft...
Good point.
So his post is external marketing spam should be deleted.
Dave F.
Hi,
On 01/04/11 13:31, John Smith wrote:
you misunderstood. After 31st March you have to mandatory agree to CT in
order to continue to EDIT.
eg: After this date no NEW nearmap data could be inserted unless compatible
with CT.
Which brings up the other point of contention about the 2/3rds of
I will currently be one of the people locked out because I have used the
Ordnance Survey open data which is apparently incompatible with the new
license. I have therefore not accepted the new terms because I can't. It is
possible that the OS situation will get resolved in the next few months but
On 5 January 2011 00:09, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
But you are right in that there is a weakness because people are not
guaranteed a right to contribute. We cannot guarantee that right of course -
snip
But what could we do? Two ideas come to mind:
Or better yet, change active
Hi,
On 01/04/11 14:59, Dave F. wrote:
On 04/01/2011 02:52, Anthony wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Dave F.dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Being curious in return, why are you curious?
Well, he does work for Microsoft...
Good point.
So his post is external marketing spam should be
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
On 01/04/11 14:59, Dave F. wrote:
On 04/01/2011 02:52, Anthony wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Dave F.dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Being curious in return, why are you curious?
Well, he does work for
A nokia 6600 running Symbian; A samsung innov8 running Symbian and a
Samsung Galaxy S running Frozen Yoghurt.
Yes, I have three ears ;-)
2011/1/4 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Hi,
On 01/04/11 14:59, Dave F. wrote:
On 04/01/2011 02:52, Anthony wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 12:32 PM,
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
But you are right in that there is a weakness because people are not
guaranteed a right to contribute.
[]
But what could we do?
Let people remove their data if they don't agree to future licensing
terms. Even an
Peter Miller wrote:
I will currently be one of the people locked out because I have used
the Ordnance Survey open data which is apparently incompatible with
the new license.
OS OpenData is AIUI compatible with ODbL and the latest Contributor Terms.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in
On 04/01/11 15:05, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
I will currently be one of the people locked out because I have used
the Ordnance Survey open data which is apparently incompatible with
the new license.
OS OpenData is AIUI compatible with ODbL and the latest Contributor Terms.
On 5 January 2011 01:02, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
But you are right in that there is a weakness because people are not
guaranteed a right to contribute.
[]
But what could we do?
Let people remove their data if
Alan,
You're right.
I fixed it. It would detect anything up to z22 now.
Martijn
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote:
Specifically I’m wondering if everyone has androids because we’re all open
source nuts or if it’s more balanced? Only the data will show.
I've got an Android of some kind. While I'm willing to put up with
proprietary
At 2011-01-04 07:13, Martijn van Exel wrote:
I fixed it. It would detect anything up to z22 now.
Nice :) Are you aware that the imagery won't zoom past z20, though?
--
Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net
___
talk mailing list
* andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com [2011-01-04 08:49 +0100]:
AFAIK Maemo, Palm's Webos and Android are all about the same level of
open, i.e. linux-based but including some closed source drivers or
libraries.
I don't know much about Maemo phones, but Palm has a more open approach to
the OS
Yes, thanks for pointing that out. This is probably a setting in the
Bing Maps API, but I plan to swith the entire thing over to OpenLayers
anyway, so I don't want to look into that too much.
Martijn van Exel +++...@rtijn.org
laziness – impatience – hubris
http://schaaltreinen.nl |
* Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com [2011-01-03 22:19 -0500]:
Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net writes:
this is why i suggested adding a centroid tag to the boundary relations
as a way to convey the place that is by convention considered the
center of town.
The word centroid seems best
Hi,
On 01/04/11 17:02, John Smith wrote:
On 5 January 2011 01:48, Frederik Rammfrede...@remote.org wrote:
No, that is not acceptable to me. Someone who participates in OSM must have
the willingness to accept what the majority wants, or else they should not
participate in the first place.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
The *main* reason for the active-contributor definition is that we need to
exclude those who are dead, unreachable, or have lost interest, from the
Phil! Gold schrieb:
I got the Palm Pre because it's the most open platform I've seen short of
OpenMoko
Erm, haven't you heard any bit about Maemo/MeeGo yet? I don't think
there's any other supported phone OS out there that is more open than
Maemo or any in development more open than MeeGo
andrzej zaborowski schrieb:
Note that that there will also be some folks that have a Nokia phone
because they're open souce nuts and use a Maemo-linux Nokia phone.
AFAIK Maemo, Palm's Webos and Android are all about the same level of
open, i.e. linux-based but including some closed source
/me points at the code in https://github.com/PeterNL/bingocular
2011/1/4 Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org:
Yes, thanks for pointing that out. This is probably a setting in the
Bing Maps API, but I plan to swith the entire thing over to OpenLayers
anyway, so I don't want to look into that too
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote:
andrzej zaborowski schrieb:
Note that that there will also be some folks that have a Nokia phone
because they're open souce nuts and use a Maemo-linux Nokia phone.
AFAIK Maemo, Palm's Webos and Android are all about the same
On 5 January 2011 03:03, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote:
Actually it does not put the onus on OSMF to remove the data. It says they
may remove the data, it doesn't say they will remove the data, or even
that they will make any attempt to remove it. Indeed I'm sure it has been
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
If you look at Android from the view point of the end user or the
hacker, it's quite closed. DRM, binary drivers, and the mobile
operators occasionally blocking tethering applications.
How are mobile operators blocking
The boundary relation[0] has roles for both admin_centre and label, though
I don't know how many renderers are using them currently. For some
reason, a lot of places (including the US) seem to have standardized on
using multipolygons instead of boundary relations for administrative
boundaries.
On 4 January 2011 16:22, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
John Smith wrote:
That might work for ODBL which has attribution requirements, although
if produced works are exempt from attribution requirements
They're not. ODbL 4.3 requires attribution on produced works.
ODbL 4.3
Peter Miller writes:
I will currently be one of the people locked out because I have used the
Ordnance Survey open data which is apparently incompatible with the new
license. I have therefore not accepted the new terms because I can't.
Why did you not create a new account you will use only
Some phones are set up so that only apps digitally signed by the carrier can be
installed.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [OSM-talk] What phones do OSMers have?
From :mailto:o...@inbox.org
Date :Tue Jan 04 11:44:06 America/Chicago 2011
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Nic Roets
2010/12/30 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
I know it may look like a lot of work adding all the no_left_turns, but it's
the right way.
I have to disagree. OSM happens to have started in the UK, but that
doesn't mean that
We've been working on OpenMaps universal version (optimized for both
iPhone and iPad) for a couple of months now and we are ready to
release the first beta. If you have an iDevice and want to beta test
it then now it is the opportunity to apply. There are 3-5 positions
available.
Please email me
On 04/01/2011 14:32, Anthony wrote:
You're right. I didn't mean my post to imply anything of the sort,
but if it was taken that way I apologize.
I think working for Microsoft is great, and I hope Steve's question
has something to do with Microsoft wanting to make as great of an OS
for smart
Dave F. wrote:
.
Fredrik; you really do need to learn how web forums work before posting
such nonsense. Just because I post a reply that criticizes the OP
doesn't mean the person I replied to directly agrees with my post (I
mean, how could he?!).
I'm really fucking pissed off with you
On 04/01/2011 22:51, Floris Looijesteijn wrote:
What? Did I miss a message from Frederik? I think his remark was
completely fair.
He inferred my comments beliefs onto someone else. How is that fair?
There's a lot of people on this list...
Err... So?
Dave F.
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 6:08 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with Nic. AFAIK there are no defaults in OSM, not UK ones, and
not others. Any not given Information is simply not yet entered.
Are you not aware of this:
At 2011-01-04 11:08, =?UTF-8?Q?M=E2=88=A1rtin_Koppenhoefer?= wrote:
2010/12/30 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
I know it may look like a lot of work adding all the no_left_turns,
but it's
the right way.
I have to
Het CBS heeft kaarten beschikbaar gesteld:
http://twitter.com/statistiekcbs/status/21128028578910208 Misschien
heeft iemand er wat aan.
Gegroet,
Frank
Op 3 januari 2011 13:04 heeft Rob interru...@gmail.com het volgende
geschreven:
Op 2 januari 2011 23:52 schreef Lennard l...@xs4all.nl het
On 4 January 2011 15:51, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Yer, but GPS's don't work underground.
AGPS does...
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On 4 January 2011 19:04, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 January 2011 15:51, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Yer, but GPS's don't work underground.
AGPS does...
or rather, some forms of AGPS do...
___
Talk-au mailing list
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 19:04:58 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 January 2011 19:04, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 January 2011 15:51, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Yer, but GPS's don't work underground.
AGPS does...
or rather, some
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 20:10:23 +1100
Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
Yer, but GPS's don't work underground.
AGPS does...
or rather, some forms of AGPS do...
I'm waiting for this to actually become available
-- Forwarded message --
From: Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com
Date: 5 January 2011 00:13
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CTs and the 1 April deadline
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
I will currently be one of the people locked out
Flooding has disrupted mail deliveries in Queensland.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/01/05/3106734.htm
I guess it might be useful after all to tag flood prone roads:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:flood_prone
___
Talk-au mailing list
2011/1/4 Rodrigo de Avila rodr...@avila.net.br:
Se não me engano, fui eu que traduzi esta String...
A diferença é que Graveyard é administrado, ou fica próximo a uma Igreja
(sabe aqueles cemitérios que ficam atrás ou do lado de uma Igreja? É um
Graveyard). Já o Cemetery é um cemitério normal,
O que vocês acham da tradução como Cemitério paroquial ?
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 09:06:38 -0200
Von: Leandro Motta Barros lmbar...@gmail.com
An: OSM talk-br talk-br@openstreetmap.org
Betreff: Re: [Talk-br] Relatório OSM-br: 02/01/2011
Eu gosto!
LMB
2011/1/4 Andre Alvarenga andrealvare...@gmx.net:
O que vocês acham da tradução como Cemitério paroquial ?
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 09:06:38 -0200
Von: Leandro Motta Barros lmbar...@gmail.com
An: OSM talk-br talk-br@openstreetmap.org
Em Ter, 2011-01-04 às 09:18 -0200, Rodrigo de Avila escreveu:
Em 4 de janeiro de 2011 09:06, Leandro Motta Barros
lmbar...@gmail.com escreveu:
até acho que usar algo mais verboso como Cemitério junto a
igreja
Concordo. Se o Djavan Fagundes puder colocar essa alteração pra
Good idea. Shpould now that before currently osmosis is working ;-)
processed by David.fx
Subject: Re: [Talk-br] Re-2: Importaçôes ilegais do usuário deltabrasil
(04-Jan-2011 14:45)
From:vitor vitor.geo...@gmail.com
To: c...@geobahia.net.br
Christian,
You can do this
Pessoal, boa noite!
Como os dados de Goiânia são relativamente completos, ao tratá-los
deparei-me com a seguinte dúvida: devo dividir as vias por bairro?
É que as vias possuem a informação do bairro ao qual elas pertencem. Como há
vias que passam por vários bairros, devo ter um segmento de via
Hvernig lýst ykkur á að nota highway:*=surface á útlínur gatna og stíga þar
sem * er sama tag og miðlína götu eða stígs?
Sjá meðfylgjandi skrá:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5821011/%C3%BAtl%C3%ADnur.osm.gz
Veit einhver til þess að gögn af þessari gerð hafi verið sett inn í
grunninn?
2010/12/30 Ævar
Hallo,
ich weiß zwar nicht, was das mit OSM zu tun hat (habe also Subject mal
mit [OT] versehen) aber wenn Du Dich mit dem MidnightCommander
anfreunden kannst (blöde Formulierung - ein PC war erst dann ein PC als
man den Norton Commander installiert hatte und so ist es unter Linux
geblieben mit
Hallo,
Am 3. Januar 2011 20:20 schrieb Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Bloede Frage - ist der Autor der AIO-Skripte denn vom Laster ueberfahren
worden...
zum Glück ja nicht:
Am 4. Januar 2011 01:19 schrieb Christoph Wagner
freemaps@googlemail.com:
Hallo an alle,
ich bin der
Am 04.01.2011 07:34, schrieb Gary68:
ich HASSE wput !!! kann ich erst heute abend in ordnung bringen...
Solange es nicht Frau und Kinder sind, kein Problem.
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 21:09 +0100, dieter jasper wrote:
Am 03.01.2011 19:57, schrieb Gary68:
it has been done. alles online
Moin,
Am 04.01.2011 07:41, schrieb Gary68:
hi,
gibt es eine funktionierende wput alternative?
Die Windowskonsole und deren Befehle ist mir jetzt so nicht geläufig ...
Ich denke das Du den Befehl rsync sehr gut für Deine Uploadprobleme
benutzen kannst (SSH Zugang vorausgesetzt). rsync ist
tirko...@yahoo.de (Tirkon) am 03.01.11:
René Falk li...@falconaerie.de wrote:
Sorry, hab mich da unklar ausgedrückt. Die vorgeschlagene Recherche
bezieht sich natürlich auf die betreffende Kirche.
Häufig steht das im Wikipedia Artikel des betreffenden Ortes oder
Ortsteils.
Sorry, Wikipedia ist
frede...@remote.org (Frederik Ramm) am 03.01.11:
Ich kann niemandem was vorschreiben, aber ich persoenlich mache
einen ganz grossen Bogen um irgendwelche Religionstags, wenn ich
nicht gerade vor der Kirche stehe und das Schild abschreibe.
Ich tagge immer nur das, was ich auch besucht habe.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo Nop,
auch ich finde Deine Lösung toll.
Habe gestern versucht unsere nächste Wanderung damit zu planen. Dabei
konnte ich eine erstellte Route zwar auf meinem Rechner sichern, jedoch
wieder hochladen ging nicht. Da es gerade funktioniert hat, war
Am 4. Januar 2011 01:45 schrieb Tirkon tirko...@yahoo.de:
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Und das wird auch so bleiben. Wir muessen damit klar kommen, dass solche
schwierigen Dinge von Leuten unterschiedlich bewertet und getaggt
werden. Eine einheitliche Linie definieren zu wollen, ist
Am 22. Dezember 2010 11:35 schrieb Steffen Heinz eifelhu...@gmx.de:
ich habe noch was entdeckt:
es gibt hier ne Stelle die war mal Supergeheim:
ne militärische Abhöranlage, duch die Bingfehler ist die nicht mehr
vorhanden, an der Stelle gibt es mehr als eine Störung
wer mag kann ja mal
hike39 wrote:
Habe gestern versucht unsere nächste Wanderung damit zu planen. Dabei
konnte ich eine erstellte Route zwar auf meinem Rechner sichern, jedoch
wieder hochladen ging nicht. Da es gerade funktioniert hat, war es wohl
nur ein temporäres Problem. Aber könntest Du mir erklären
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo Nop,
vielen Dank für die Info. Aber dann möchte ich doch noch eine Frage
stellen. Bei den FAQs zu Deiner WanderReitKarte wird bei der Frage Wie
kann ich eine Wanderroute herunterladen auf ein Wegeverzeichnis
verwiesen. Dieses habe ich noch nicht
Am 04.01.2011 09:15, schrieb T. Clormann:
Hallo,
Am 3. Januar 2011 20:20 schrieb Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Bloede Frage - ist der Autor der AIO-Skripte denn vom Laster ueberfahren
worden...
zum Glück ja nicht:
da bin ich aber auch ziemlich froh ;)
Etwas rätselhaft war der
Am 04.01.2011 12:47, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
M.E. ein gutes Beispiel, wie man nicht mappen sollte: Zaun, Track und
Landuse alle auf denselben Nodes. Es bleibt unklar, ob der Weg
innerhalb oder ausserhalb des Geländes liegt.
Leider kenne ich mich dort nicht aus. Kann das jemand mit
hi.
wput hin oder her... lade die datei mal erst herunter und öffne sie
DANACH! geht das?
bei mir ist es aus irgendeinem grunde so...
ciao
gerhard
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 07:34 +0100, Gary68 wrote:
ich HASSE wput !!! kann ich erst heute abend in ordnung bringen...
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at
Guten Tag,
ich lade vom Ftp-Server mit der Adresse ftp5.gwdg.de aus dem
Verzeichnis
ftp://ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/misc/openstreetmap/download.openstreetmap.de/
diverse Karten herunter.
Seit einiger Zeit scheinen die Links (=Dateiverweise) nicht mehr zu
funktionieren: So wird z. B. von der URL
1 - 100 of 264 matches
Mail list logo
