Hi Marion,
I usually just search in the search box of wiki.openstreetmap.org when I don't
know a tag.
doctors leads to : amenity=doctors
Dental to : amenity=dentist
Optometrists to : shop=optician
...
browsing the map_features page can also give ideas
Hi Marion
I'm no expert either, but generally the OSM wiki is a good place to start:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dhospital
It gives useful guidelines like Hospital is bigger than Clinic. Clinic is
bigger than Doctor, and it also answers your query about emergency
On 01.02.2013 22:07, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
The verb 'to geocode' is generic English language word and I'll stand
by that even if a US court decides otherwise.
+1
And there was also mentioned that tradmark was rejected in EU.
Additionally: if i search for the some information in the WWW I
From: Ilya Zverev [mailto:zve...@textual.ru]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Recent edits in the wiki / Trademark issue
Hi. Since no one has explained, I'd quote a part from OSMF Board Meeting
Minutes:
OSMF received C+D letter from someone who trademarked the word
“Geocode(TM)” and asks us to
On 02/01/2013 04:22 PM, Simon Poole wrote:
Please address any questions on the matter to me by e-mail and not to
the list.
Why?
Paweł
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 02/01/2013 08:54 PM, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
I agree with what you're saying although I can't help thinking that
if the OSMF can't take the risk of having some things in the wiki,
the solution, for everyone's benefit, is to move the wiki to a server
that's not paid for by the OSMF. I'm
On Friday, February 1, 2013, Simon Poole wrote:
If you find use of the term “geocode” on our wiki or help site please
replace it with a generic term (for example search), or report it to my
e-mail address.
Hey Simon - I find this hard to believe. Can you confirm that OSMF was
requested to
+1 to many responses in this thread. I'm in favour of a bit more
centralized steering of OSM. Not only by OSMF, but also by other people
(within and outside working groups) who will put a bit more coordinated
energy in thinking about strenghts, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.
Like
On 02/02/2013 02:38 PM, Ed Loach wrote:
As far as I can see, OSMF Ltd is very like KDE ev; compare
http://blog.osmfoundation.org/about/ and
http://ev.kde.org/whatiskdeev.php
Legal status is the least of what I meant. Compare what OSMF does with
this quarterly report from the KDE foundation:
yes;
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Go_Map
On Jan 25, 2013, at 9:34 AM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
Cool, getting my iPhone next week, so can't wait to try it out!
Is it listed on the OSM wiki yet?
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Jeff Meyer j...@gwhat.org
Hi Rob
As a UK countryside mapper using a Blumax and Garmin 62s and JOSM I'd make the
following comments:
At this time my personal answer would be almost anywhere (path, tracks, roads
etc. etc.). I also understand that the accuracy of the GPS trace will vary
with time due to the position
I've taken the time and at least on more or less current pages have
redone the edits with a bit a finer brush, essentially with a very small
number of exceptions there should be no noticeable impact on actual
content now.
I'm reaching out to our counsel to see if we can release the CD, but
IMHO
On Feb 1, 2013, at 10:22 AM, Simon Poole si...@osmfoundation.org wrote:
If you find use of the term “geocode” on our wiki or help site please
replace it with a generic term (for example search), or report it to my
e-mail address.
Hey Simon - I find this hard to believe. Can you confirm
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 04:45:56PM +0100, Simon Poole wrote:
I'm reaching out to our counsel to see if we can release the CD, but
IMHO it is unlikely. Further I know that the statement has caused some
Come on. That's rediculous. What's this? A secret government order? What do you
fear will
On 02/01/2013 07:47 PM, f.dos.san...@free.fr wrote:
It's here :
https://docs.google.com/a/osmfoundation.org/document/d/19wLhnezowHBio9zGaJkNaCbDX-gmWNHUSdx1kdQJYY0/edit
/Cease+Desist letter Geocode(TM)/
/OSMF received C+D letter from someone who trademarked the word
Geocode(TM) and
was: geocoding trademark thread
I think Paweł has hit on a key question: does the OSMF have plans to
operate and lead OSM in a more efficient, organized manner or not? And, to
an even more relevant issue: how many people like Paweł show up on the
doorstep and don't bother engaging for the same
Hi all, hi Simon,
I tried to wait a day and think about what's been written and to calm
down about this unspeakable issue. But I can't stop myself from
replying.
I don't mind about the word/trademark GEOCODE, nor do I mind about your
wiki changes. But what makes me furious is your/the OSMF's
Jochen123 wrote
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 04:45:56PM +0100, Simon Poole wrote:
I'm reaching out to our counsel to see if we can release the CD, but
IMHO it is unlikely. Further I know that the statement has caused some
Come on. That's rediculous. What's this? A secret government order? What
Jean-Marc Liotier wrote
Is a cease desist letter all it takes for the OSMF to cave in to silly
demands from random parties ? Can't we at least make a symbolic stand
and let the aggressor escalate before we capitulate ? From a purely
material point of view, that would be cheap publicity for
On 02/02/2013 07:41 PM, Jeff Meyer wrote:
There's a group working in parallel to put together a strategic plan,
in the absence of one, but doing this without leadership and support
from the top can be problematic.
Couple of people have mentioned the Strategic Working Group[1] to me in
the last
For what it's worth, I agree with Jeff and Paweł on this.
If OSMF is going to be a big, beautiful mess it should own that and publish the
CD for everyone to see. Anarchists gonna anarchate.
If on the other hand we want strong leadership that can handle a trademark
dispute on its own, then
On 02/02/2013 19:55, Michal Migurski wrote:
For what it's worth, I agree with Jeff and Paweł on this.
If OSMF is going to be a big, beautiful mess it should own that and publish the
CD for everyone to see. Anarchists gonna anarchate.
If on the other hand we want strong leadership that can
This discussion is way out of hand. You guys screaming for publishing the C+D,
didn't you see the answer from SimonPoole? They have asked lawyers about advise
in publishing it, as well as releasing more information about it. It is not a
sign of weak leadership to ask for legal advise in a case
You might think that OSMF is not being transparent enough at this point. I
think we'll learn more in time. I've gone into detail on my blog if you
want more words. :-)
But, looking at the CD as a negotiation, it would be foolish to discuss
settlement terms in advance in public. For example,
Maybe a few of you braver than the brave, loud-mouthed, armchair lawyers
should just STFU and give the board a break.
When some of you have had as much abuse and hassle in an unpaid job they
volunteered for, in their spare time, maybe then you would understand
how hard it is to please all of
I'm not a lawyer with experience in this area, so for me it would make no
sense to take a look at the CD at this moment. If there's such a lawyer
among the readers of this list or in our related friends/family, he/she can
advice the OSMF board directly with the needed level of professional
advice.
On 02/02/2013 10:23 PM, Chris Hill wrote:
Threats to leave the project remind me of the bullshit thrown around
during licence-change when hardly anyone actually had the balls to
follow through. If people are so unhappy then go, but do so quickly
and quietly and leave the people really
On 02/02/2013 21:01, Aun Yngve Johnsen wrote:
This discussion is way out of hand. You guys screaming for publishing the C+D,
didn't you see the answer from SimonPoole? They have asked lawyers about advise
in publishing it, as well as releasing more information about it. It is not a
sign of
On 02/02/13 22:07, Paweł Paprota wrote:
On 02/02/2013 10:23 PM, Chris Hill wrote:
Threats to leave the project remind me of the bullshit thrown around
during licence-change when hardly anyone actually had the balls to
follow through. If people are so unhappy then go, but do so quickly
and
On 02/02/2013 22:07, Paweł Paprota wrote:
On 02/02/2013 10:23 PM, Chris Hill wrote:
Threats to leave the project remind me of the bullshit thrown around
during licence-change when hardly anyone actually had the balls to
follow through. If people are so unhappy then go, but do so quickly
and
Pawel,
you are too impatient, at least too impatient for the occasionally
glacial pace at which things move in OSM(F).
You have been with OSM for about 6 months now if I'm not mistaken, and
most of your recent messages (at least most of the messages that reach
me) are about how and why
On Feb 2, 2013, at 2:49 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
And Jeff followed up:
I think Paweł has hit on a key question: does the OSMF have plans to operate
and lead OSM in a more efficient, organized manner or not?
In what way would an organisation with great strategic planning, one that is
Christopher,
On 02.02.2013 23:29, Christopher Woods (IWD) wrote:
As it is, OSMF seems notionally answerable to the greater OSM community
after being nominated to oversee its concerns and become custodian of
the equipment, run outreach projects, fundraise etc. The board is
elected by just 358
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Finally, I am somewhat puzzled by the connection that you (and also Jeff)
seem to make between the perceived lack of planning and the current
trademark issue that spawned the thread.
I didn't make that connection
On 02/02/2013 23:17, Frederik Ramm wrote:
The OSMF board discussed this issue at their F2F meeting in Berlin
last November (meeting minutes:
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Board_Meeting_Minutes_2012-11-03).
At the meeting we churned through several variations on the topic of
who is the
Everybody volunteers their time and knowledge but the existence of a board
at OSMF doesn't simply mean that some volunteers are now more equal than
others. (Organisations frequently rotate through board members.)
Thinking about structure, some discussion should be given as to OSMF
possibly
I'm interested in OSM. I do mapping. I subscribed to Talk after a few
weeks on Newbies, but all these political outcries strongly tempt me to
unsubscribe. They don't contribute to the mapping that is presumably our
primary interest.
On 02/02/2013 5:07 PM, Paweł Paprota wrote:
On 02/02/2013
I support the boards's decisions not only because of being consequent
(having elected them democratically) but because of good reasons.
Although I worked next to Einstein's office (90 years later after he
was at Swiss patent office :-) I'm not a lawyer. But I learned to be
cautious when there's a
Just for the curious of this ridiculous U.S. trademark thing:
I found another company claiming GEOCODE as trademark:
http://www.markhound.com/trademark/search/WbEfGtOgm
And I'm wondering what these 65 services will do
http://www.programmableweb.com/apitag/geocoding
especially TomTom with it's
http://www.barksnkisses.com/components/com_content/yaid3523.php
.
El Segundo Can#39;t win___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Hallo,
die Demoseite scheint nicht mehr zu funktionieren. Jedenfalls werden
hier keine Straßennamen mehr
angezeigt
http://mlm.jochentopf.com/?zoom=18lat=51.76091lon=14.32664layers=B0Tlang=de
grüße
Andreas
Am 30.11.2012 15:38, schrieb Jochen Topf:
Ich arbeite an einer mehrsprachigen Karte,
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:48:21AM +0100, Andreas Dommaschk wrote:
die Demoseite scheint nicht mehr zu funktionieren. Jedenfalls werden
hier keine Straßennamen mehr
angezeigt
http://mlm.jochentopf.com/?zoom=18lat=51.76091lon=14.32664layers=B0Tlang=de
Doch, das funktioniert schon.
Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org wrote:
http://mlm.jochentopf.com/?zoom=18lat=51.76091lon=14.32664layers=B0Tlang=de
Doch, das funktioniert schon. Wahrscheinlich gibts an der Stelle halt keine
name:de-Tags, sondern nur name-Tags, wie man das ja auch erwarten würde.
Genau, denn das hier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Moin,
abgesehen davon, dass die Wiki vor ein paar Nächten gar nicht erreichbar
war, habe ich derzeit einige Probleme mit ihr:
1. mit HTTPS nur unzureichend nutzbar.
Schalte ich in meinem Chrome HTTPS fürs Wiki an (ok, macht
HTTPS-Everywhere
On 01/02/13 22:44, Frederik Ramm wrote:
On 01.02.2013 17:27, fly wrote:
Hey
Werde jetzt doch mal auch auf talk@osm posten und mache mich bereit zumindest
die Zentralen Azoren zu revertieren.
Ich kann das auch uebernehmen, aber ich moechte gern einen stichhaltigen Grund
dafuer haben.
Hallo,
es gibt Neues von unserer 3D-Slippymap zu berichten. Die auffälligste
Änderung zuerst: Ab jetzt ist die Karte offiziell für ganz Deutschland
verfügbar.
http://maps.osm2world.org
Auch auf den zweiten Blick sind aber noch einige Neuerungen zu
entdecken, die wir in den letzten Monaten
echt toll
Schön, dass ihr sogar die Spuren mit rendert. Bei der Farbgebung, könnte
man vllt noch die Landuses/Landcover mit einbeziehen...momentan wirkt es
durch den gleichmäßigen Hintergrund etwas eintönig.
Sogar treelines wertet ihr aus...und die Stromleitungen sehen klasse aus
Hier scheint es
Hallo Christian,
Am 03.02.2013 00:20, schrieb christian.pietz...@googlemail.com:
echt toll
Schön, dass ihr sogar die Spuren mit rendert. Bei der Farbgebung, könnte
man vllt noch die Landuses/Landcover mit einbeziehen...momentan wirkt es
durch den gleichmäßigen Hintergrund etwas eintönig.
Hier stehen noch einige Gebäude im Wasser ...
http://maps.osm2world.org/?h=128view=Ezoom=17lat=49.44349lon=8.89665layers=B0
On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 23:02:44 +0100
Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
Hallo,
es gibt Neues von unserer 3D-Slippymap zu berichten. Die auffälligste
Änderung
Il 01/02/2013 20:48, Leonardo ha scritto:
Ciao,
potresti zoomare fino a 10 metri sopra l'errore in JOSM, il server non
dovrebbe farti storie per scaricare quella parte.
Leonardo
Grazie Leonardo per i nodi uso 0 e per le aree come suggerisci tu 10 è
perfetto.
Ciao, fair (Mario).
allora, ho registrato due tracce del percorso che faccio di solito,
-ho usato OSMtracker,
-ho visto che c'era la possiilita' di prendere appunti vocali e l'ho
fatto nei punti salienti,
-ho convertito in GPX,
dal telefono ho individuato queste directory che dovrebbero essere
relative alle
Il giorno 02 febbraio 2013 11:28, yahoo-pier_andreit
pier_andr...@yahoo.itha scritto:
allora, ho registrato due tracce del percorso che faccio di solito,
-ho usato OSMtracker,
-ho visto che c'era la possiilita' di prendere appunti vocali e l'ho fatto
nei punti salienti,
-ho convertito in
Buongiorno
Chi sa spiegarmi questo [1] comportamento della OSRM?
[1]
http://map.project-osrm.org/?hl=itloc=45.875600,12.286620loc=45.872710,12.280030z=17center=45.874570,12.284743alt=0df=0re=0
Grazie
___
Talk-it mailing list
Il giorno 02 febbraio 2013 12:13, gpstracks.it m...@gpstracks.it ha
scritto:
Buongiorno
Chi sa spiegarmi questo [1] comportamento della OSRM?
[1] http://map.project-osrm.org/?**hl=itloc=45.875600,12.286620**
loc=45.872710,12.280030z=17**center=45.874570,12.284743**
2013/2/2 sabas88 saba...@gmail.com:
adesso, cosa devo fare ? :-
Apri con JOSM la traccia (apri JOSM, trascini la traccia nell'area e si
apre, poi scarichi i dati sopra, dovrebbe capire da solo l'area, altrimenti
clicchi col destro sulla traccia e dovrebbe esserci un scarica dati
bisgona imporatare i dati in postgis.
osm2pgsql
osmosis
sono 2 tool che potrebbero andare bene.
è una domanda troppo generica per rispondere più specificatamente.
:)
2013/2/1 sabas88 saba...@gmail.com
http://blog.openstreetmap.it/utenti/
un utente ha fatto un commento qua (non capisco perchè
On 02/02/13 12:56, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2013/2/2 sabas88 saba...@gmail.com:
adesso, cosa devo fare ? :-
Apri con JOSM la traccia (apri JOSM, trascini la traccia nell'area e si
apre, poi scarichi i dati sopra, dovrebbe capire da solo l'area, altrimenti
clicchi col destro sulla
.. ok ho optato per joms da browser visto che per linux c'e' solo per
ubuntu, ho visto che la maggior parte dei punti sono tracciati, ma c'e' un
pezzo di una strada che ha il nome sbagliato, come faccio a dividere quella
strada in due e dare al pezzo il nome giusto??
Se ho capito bene, non
Il giorno 01 febbraio 2013 20:50, sabas88 saba...@gmail.com ha scritto:
http://blog.openstreetmap.it/utenti/
un utente ha fatto un commento qua (non capisco perchè l'ho lasciata
aperta, vabbè :D) e ha fatto una domanda su postgis chiedendo se ci fosse
una guida semplice per usare osm in
2013/2/2 yahoo-pier_andreit pier_andr...@yahoo.it:
.. ok ho optato per joms da browser visto che per linux c'e' solo per
ubuntu, ho visto che la maggior parte dei punti sono tracciati, ma c'e' un
pezzo di una strada che ha il nome sbagliato, come faccio a dividere quella
strada in due e
Sulla mappa ci sono un po' di strade (~450) taggate con name=fixme o
name=FIXME.
Uno a caso:
Girare a destra su FIXME
http://osrm.at/2fC
Come già detto in lista in passato (non trovo più il thread), è sbagliato
taggare così le vie prive di nome, tanto più adesso che esistono dei siti
che le
Il 02 febbraio 2013 15:06, Groppo O ha scritto:
Sulla mappa ci sono un po' di strade (~450) taggate con name=fixme o
name=FIXME.
e ci sono diverse varianti:
count | name
---+--
1 | fix
3 | FIX
1 | FIXED
Direi di toglierli, tanto JOSM segnala le strade senza nome come errore
e comunque, come hai linkato tu, esistono i siti che le segnalano.
Leonardo
Il 02/02/2013 15:06, Groppo O ha scritto:
Sulla mappa ci sono un po' di strade (~450) taggate con name=fixme o
name=FIXME.
Uno a caso:
Girare a
02.02.2013 - 15:06 - Groppo O:
Sulla mappa ci sono un po' di strade (~450) taggate con name=fixme o
name=FIXME.
Uno a caso:
Girare a destra su FIXME
http://osrm.at/2fC
Come già detto in lista in passato (non trovo più il thread), è
sbagliato taggare così le vie prive di nome, tanto più
Secondo me sarebbe meglio convertire in fixme=name per i name=fixme, gli
altri mettere fixme=yes e copiare name in note.
Il giorno 02 febbraio 2013 15:30, Leonardo kinetocor...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
Direi di toglierli, tanto JOSM segnala le strade senza nome come errore
e comunque, come hai
Il giorno sab, 02/02/2013 alle 15.29 +0100, Daniele Forsi ha scritto:
e ci sono diverse varianti:
count | name
---+--
1 | fix
3 | FIX
1 | FIXED
1 | fixend
1 | Fixke
128 | fixme
2
Il 31/01/2013 20:22, Leonardo ha scritto:
Si
potrebbe aggiungere un subtag centre_zone=yes per non perdere
l'informazione? Ammetto che non c'è nessun uso precedente di questo
tag (0)
+1, meglio aggiungere un tag in più per distinguere una specifica
caratteristica della zona.
Non trovo sul
Ciao a tutti,
ho provato a fare un test di conversione utilizzando le regole fissate
fino ad oggi e a controllare il risultato su JOSM. Ho scelto uno dei
casi peggiori ovvero Padova. La prima conversione da è andata senza
nessun problema, ho riproiettato su QGIS e trasformato con shp-to-osm.
Il 02/02/2013 14:42, Groppo O ha scritto:
Il giorno 01 febbraio 2013 11:51, Mario Pichetti
mario.piche...@gmail.com mailto:mario.piche...@gmail.com ha scritto:
In Errori in OSM, sto correggendo *Numeri telefonici non conformi.*
Non sarebbe male se assieme al numero di telefono si
2013/2/2 Mario Pichetti mario.piche...@gmail.com:
Il 02/02/2013 14:42, Groppo O ha scritto:
Non sarebbe male se assieme al numero di telefono si inserisse anche:
addr:city
addr:country
addr:housenumber
addr:street
e se è presente un sito, website:
esempio: 46.0746795 lon=11.1252445
Il 02/02/2013 18:56, Mario Pichetti ha scritto:
Il 02/02/2013 14:42, Groppo O ha scritto:
Il giorno 01 febbraio 2013 11:51, Mario Pichetti
mario.piche...@gmail.com mailto:mario.piche...@gmail.com ha scritto:
In Errori in OSM, sto correggendo *Numeri telefonici non conformi.*
Non
2013/2/2 Daniele Forsi dfo...@gmail.com:
C) Cancelliamo name=fixme e basta
+1 almeno per quelli più semplici
si, nel caso che non contiene informazioni toglierei il tag
(name=fixme ecc. anche FIXME contattare killer fiore serve tracccia
gps)
invece questi (e simili) mettrei come valore sotto
On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 18:56:37 +0100, Mario Pichetti wrote:
Il 02/02/2013 14:42, Groppo O ha scritto:
Il giorno 01 febbraio 2013 11:51, Mario Pichetti
mario.piche...@gmail.com mailto:mario.piche...@gmail.com ha scritto:
In Errori in OSM, sto correggendo *Numeri telefonici non
Ciao a tutti.
Ho trovato molti errori nei link ai siti web.
Consiglio_verificate sempre collegandovi al sito_ e usate il
classico Ctrl_CCtrl_V.
E' semplice, veloce, sicuro.
Ciao fair (Mario)
___
Talk-it mailing list
On 02/02/2013 15:05, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2013/2/2 yahoo-pier_andreit pier_andr...@yahoo.it:
.. ok ho optato per joms da browser visto che per linux c'e' solo per
ubuntu, ho visto che la maggior parte dei punti sono tracciati, ma c'e' un
pezzo di una strada che ha il nome sbagliato,
Ciao,
fatto un test su Montebelluna dato che presenta anche un ospedale, delle
scuole e dei parchi. Allora il risultato non è male, c'è un pò da
lavorare post conversione ma niente di estremo. La maggior parte dei
terreni segnati come 12130 Aree destinate a servizi pubblici, militari e
02.02.2013 - 19:03 - David Paleino:
Non sarebbe male se assieme al numero di telefono si inserisse anche:
addr:city
addr:country
Non questi due, per favore :(
+1
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
On Viernes, 1 de febrero de 2013 06:44:45 Ricardo Sanz wrote:
propongo aprobar esta tabla ya
[...]
No está bien por varias causas.
a) autopistas y autovías están señalizadas igual 'highway=motorway'
b) las carreteras de doble calzada no son troncales per se, no pueden
etiquetarse como
El 2 de febrero de 2013 12:45, Noel David Torres Taño
env...@rolamasao.orgescribió:
a) autopistas y autovías están señalizadas igual 'highway=motorway'
Exactamente como en el resto del territorio español.
b) las carreteras de doble calzada no son troncales per se, no pueden
etiquetarse
De acuerdo en todo con David Marín
:)
---
Ricardo Sanz Moreno
El 02/02/2013, a las 15:08, David Marín Carreño dav...@gmail.com escribió:
El 2 de febrero de 2013 12:45, Noel David Torres Taño env...@rolamasao.org
escribió:
a) autopistas y autovías
On Sábado, 2 de febrero de 2013 16:13:19 Ricardo Sanz wrote:
De acuerdo en todo con David Marín
:)
Adelante pues
Hay que actualizar también la lista de Carreteras de Tenerife
Noel
er Envite
-
A: Because it breaks the logical flow of discussion.
Q: Why is top
No es la misma?
---
Ricardo Sanz Moreno
El 02/02/2013, a las 17:19, Noel David Torres Taño env...@rolamasao.org
escribió:
On Sábado, 2 de febrero de 2013 16:13:19 Ricardo Sanz wrote:
De acuerdo en todo con David Marín
:)
Adelante pues
Hay que
Na Prost Mahlzeit, durch einen OSMBug bin ich auf diese Gegend hier (in
Wien) beim Trillerpark gestoßen. Das ist ja grauenvoll.. so schlecht
können doch nichtmal Yahoo-Bilder gewesen sein?
http://osm.org/go/0JrMwsVCI-
Ich werde mich mal von Süden ans verbessern machen.
Best,
Markus
On
Hi,
ich habe das buildings-tool 29210 installiert (josm 5608) und finde
diese Funktion nicht. In den Shortcut-Einstellungen finde ich wenn ich
nach building suche nur den 'draw buliding mode' und 'set building size'.
Es muss sich also um ein anderes Plugin handeln? Ich würd das auch gerne
On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 10:59:27 +0100
Markus Straub markus.straub...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
ich habe das buildings-tool 29210 installiert (josm 5608) und finde
diese Funktion nicht. In den Shortcut-Einstellungen finde ich wenn ich
nach building suche nur den 'draw buliding mode' und 'set
Am 02.02.2013 01:15, schrieb Stefan Tauner:
gerade in #osm vorbegehuscht: http://mapcomlu.com/
eine karte, die (schadhafte) turn restrictions sehr hübsch visualisiert.
Der Link ergibt nur Seitenfehler - Server nicht gefunden!?
Peter.
___
Talk-at
http://map.comlu.com/
Weiteres gibt es im Forum:
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=19834
Am 03.02.2013, 00:22 Uhr, schrieb Peter Kössler pkoess...@gmx.net:
Am 02.02.2013 01:15, schrieb Stefan Tauner:
gerade in #osm vorbegehuscht: http://mapcomlu.com/
eine karte, die
On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 00:22:15 +0100
Peter Kössler pkoess...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 02.02.2013 01:15, schrieb Stefan Tauner:
gerade in #osm vorbegehuscht: http://mapcomlu.com/
eine karte, die (schadhafte) turn restrictions sehr hübsch visualisiert.
Der Link ergibt nur Seitenfehler - Server nicht
I agree that advocacy with all levels of government is important. They
seem in general to be interested, and to listen politely, but often to not
understand that creating a new license is poison to open data. So it is
important to keep talking with them, more and more of them, until they
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 4:08 PM, nicholas ingalls nicholas.inga...@gmail.com
wrote:
My personal preference is to enable the JOSM sidewalk style and then use
the sidewalk:right sidewalk:left, sidewalk:both, or sidewalk:none tags on
the actual street. The footpaths are just about useless (as in
Thanks Richard,
I better understand the difference between the two licenses.
Pierre
De : Richard Weait rich...@weait.com
À : Talk-CA OpenStreetMap talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Envoyé le : Samedi 2 février 2013 4h26
Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] Gouvernement ouvert
Bonjour all
To add my comments on this topic, I never add ordinary sidewalks except if
they are physically separated from the street (not adjacent to). If I had
to map them, I would use sidewalk:* tags.
I still think as Richard wrote: I have roads and other things to map; I'll
worry about
Jasne turisticke stejne jako cyklisticke trasy pomoci relaci :)
mrkni na
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Czech_Republic/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Turistick.C3.A9_zna.C4.8Den.C3.AD
2013/2/2 Pavel Pilát pavel.pi...@gmail.com:
ad 1) JOSM hlásí varování právě pro případ, že
-- Původní zpráva --
Od: Michal Tauchman michal.tauch...@gmail.com
Datum: 2. 2. 2013
Předmět: [Talk-cz] Dva dotazy
Ahoj,
potřeboval bych poradit s těmito záležitostmi:
1) V našem městě je viadukt, na kterém vede železnice a pod mostem
prochází silnice.
Problém je, že KeepRight
Ahoj,
ad 2)
pokud nahodou to nebyla vykreslena plati pro http://mtbmap.cz tak radeji
odpovidam: pro vykresleni na teto mape je nutne zodpovedne uvadet tag
osmc:symbol. Bez nej se trasy KCT nevykresli.
Martin
Dne 2. února 2013 12:10 Michal Tauchman michal.tauch...@gmail.comnapsal(a):
Ahoj,
Křížení železnice a silnice může být buď mimoúrovňové, nebo tam může být
přejezd.
V prvním případě nesmí být mezi oběma liniemi žádný společný bod a na
komunikaci, která je výš se vyznačí most tak, že se tato komunikace na
koncích mostu rozdělí a mostní úsek se vyznačí jako bridge=yes +
Le message suivant de :
##
Bonjour,
Je me pose la question suivante:
Comment tagger les batiments de la Direction générale des Finances publiques
En fait les bâtiments qui importent vraiment sont ceux qui reçoivent du public
(là où l'on doit faire des démarches).
Wikipedia:
Le message suivant de :
##
Bonjour,
s'il vous plait j'aimerais savoir comment contacter une personne qui a apporter
des modifications sur la carte OSM?
Merci
a été posté sur le forum http://forum.openstreetmap.fr/viewtopic.php?f=2t=494
Une réponse par mail sur l'adresse
Christian Rogel
christian.ro...@club-internet.fr wrote:
Je suis aussi assez dubitatif sur ce genre de rendu qui peut avoir
certains intérêts (on a tous des centres d'intérêts différents et un
rendu généraliste ne pourra pas satisfaire tout le monde) mais un tel
niveau de détail me
Nous sommes plusieurs à avoir mis ces découpages d'anciennes communes en
admin_level=10 comme si il s'agissait de quartiers.
admin_level=9 n'est à utiliser que pour les arrondissements municipaux
(Paris, Lyon, Marseille).
Pour conserver le ref:INSEE, un old_ref:INSEE est sûrement une solution
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
