, but not 100%
sure)..
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/76478134
-James
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
is not labeled as such.
Could this problem be alleviated with a tag on the separately mapped
footway, e.g. road_name? Or even just addr:street?
James
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
and other interchange reconfigurations in the
Statesville, NC area), but wanted to add the extra note info but couldn't since
that part didn't show up.
So, I hope you can get the notes part fixed and working. I tried it in both
IE-11 (patched all the way) and Firefox Beta 29.
-James
Hi all,
I've been trying to find the best way to extract global admin boundaries
for admin_level 2 - 4 (or more, depending on size). Up until now, XAPI has
been my go-to, but that seems to tap out at anything more than 10 or 20
degrees square.
[moreover, and this might be due to a mistake on my
, entered
the above link in the service url section and clicked on the get layers
button. I selected the image layer and then changed the image type to
BMP as I have found that the default tiff's don't tend to work.
Hope this helps,
James
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 17:26 +, Kam, Kristen -(p
See this tweet I got back from them asking the same question:
https://twitter.com/MapQuestTech/status/436876342861512704
-James
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org
together. So, I thought we should just hase this out again so we can attempt
to get each state on the same page if possible.
-James
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org
Martijn, the bad versions of the relation pages are back from the beginning of
February. :(
From: m...@rtijn.org
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 21:55:37 -0800
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] maproulette.org
Hi all,
I fixed the relation pages problem. It turns out that
to them (no idea how he's doing that!).
-James
From: st...@asklater.com
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:15:16 -0700
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-us] Telenav giving away iPad Mini or Galaxy Note to Editor
with the Most Edits Made By March 10
From;
http://stevecoast.com/2014/02
Thank you Frederik. Really appreciate it.
-James
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 22:59:57 +0100
From: frede...@remote.org
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] South Carolina State Highways - primary overload
All,
On 09.12.2013 06:42, James Mast wrote:
Is it just me
, it
could be a gold mine for getting a big area of addresses done for the OSM world.
-James
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
.
-James
From: ian.d...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 10:28:38 -0600
To: rickmastfa...@hotmail.com
CC: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Allegheny County (Pennsylvania) real estate assessment
website for addresses
If you want to go through the import process, I'd recommend using
All right, I'll be sending the e-mail to the DWG in a few minutes then. Life
has been a little crazy here preventing me from doing it sooner than this.
-James
From: mart...@openstreetmap.us
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 07:07:48 -0800
To: rickmastfa...@hotmail.com
CC: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
So, nobody else has a comment on how the repair work should be done?
Last chance before I respond back to the DWG e-mail (and as of right now, will
be recommending just the reverting of only the 'highway=xxx' upgrades). Just
want to make sure the masses don't have a problem with this.
-James
-James
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 07:24:50 -0500
From: nice...@att.net
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] South Carolina State Highways - primary overload
On 1/16/2014 12:16 AM, James Mast wrote:
Anyways guys, post what you think should be done here so I can get back
to the DWG
done only and not a full scale revert of all his
changesets as he did do some highway cleanup in some changesets while doing the
'highway=xxx' upgrades.)
-James
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Virginia and it was
exactly how I did it in the OSM data on the most recently opened segment of
that highway.
I just thought that this was interesting and wanted you guys to know about this.
-James
___
talk mailing
should always take a look at the entire history
of a relation/way/node to figure out who might need to be contacted to help
resolve something.
-James
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https
Virginia and it was
exactly how I did it in the OSM data on the most recently opened segment of
that highway.
I just thought that this was interesting and wanted you guys to know about this.
-James
___
Talk-us
days.
-James
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
) were added
along it.
So, at least when it comes to Interstates with 2 or more Interstates posted on
a segment, you should always put the one that the mile markers/exit numbers are
based off of first in the way ref tag.
-James
segment hidden
while on Interstates. Plus I have tons of experience with it having traveled
it a lot in my life.
-James
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
a way that's part of a relation yet, which
isn't good at all.)
-James
From: m...@rtijn.org
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:16:54 -0800
To: rickmastfa...@hotmail.com
CC: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Separate relations for each direction of US State
highways.
Hmm yes
this subject. So please don't
try to do many more changes just in case they decide a mass revert of this
users changesets is the best way to fix all of this. That way, there will not
be any major conflicts when they try to do this if possible.
-James
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:13:10 -0500
From
with this. There is now no way to link somebody to a specific
page if a user has several questionable edits that aren't within his last ~20
edits. This is something IMO that needs to be brought back ASAP.
-James
, it would take forever I would think.
-James
[1] - http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/33.2388/-81.4205layers=N
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
on normal ways
(look @ Mapquest Open and their rendering of highway shields based off the ref
tags on ways). Heck, maybe even a : might work (role = north:unsigned).
-James
From: m...@rtijn.org
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 23:01:09 -0700
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Separate relations for each direction of US
=image/tiffVERSION=1.1.1SERVICE=WMSREQUEST=GetMapLAYERS=Orthoimagery_LatestSTYLES=SRS={proj}WIDTH={width}HEIGHT={height}BBOX={bbox}
James
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 21:59 -0500, Mike N wrote:
On 12/4/2013 9:07 PM, Kam, Kristen -(p) wrote:
James,
I located NAIP imagery for the state of North
segment and one covering
the entire route with the unsigned_ref tag. Annoying and easily broken by
new users who don't know why there are two relations for the exact same route
on some segments.
-James
From: m...@rtijn.org
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 09:25:11 -0700
To: rickmastfa...@hotmail.com
CC
of I-85/I-485 up
since we still have the old pre-construction configuration in OSM.
-James
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
the new feed link is for my watch area
manually and updated it in my RSS feed reader [4].
Still, there needs to be some tweaks to the history part of the new design.
-James
[1] -
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changesets/feed?bbox=-80.54%2C40.358%2C-79.526%2C40.779
[2] - http
. But I wouldn't be
totally opposed to doing it like the hidden segment of US-19 Truck mentioned
above inside of the relation.
I hope this fully explains what I'm suggesting to do Peter and everybody else.
;)
-James
[1] - http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43147401
[2] - http://www.openstreetmap.org
still (US-85 in NM as an example).
Anybody else agree with me that this might work better than the two relations
for the highways that have segments that are hidden?
-James
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us
to the cardinal directions.
-James
[1] - http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/416519
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 22:22:47 -0500
From: saiarcot...@gmail.com
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] [josm-dev] Relation editor support for north/south and
east/west similar
Does anybody know why they were moved the other day on the wiki? I think it
might have just been an honest mistake by the user, but is there any way to
revert it so that the original history is back in place for Key:highway?
-James
Pieren, I don't think it was moved back per say. It seems to me that somebody
just copied the last good version from before the move and then pasted it over
the redirect. Thus, that's why the history [1] the talk page [2] didn't
return to the main page.
-James
[1] - http
://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/5109
- James
From: m...@rtijn.org
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:26:27 -0700
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Separate relations for each direction of US State
highways.
To: rickmastfa...@hotmail.com
CC: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
You mean that in the relation editor, you would be able
to code in Java.
-James
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
in relation analysis inside of JOSM that the roles
forward/backward have in making sure the relation has no gaps.
-James
[1] - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/5109#comment:18
[2] - http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1593699
email response, a real live person!
--
James
VE6SRV
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
to account for this so that the routers give the
person the correct info. As we do know, diagonal routes can be a major pain in
this area.
-James (rickmastfan67)
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https
and I
think it's completely un-divided in VA.
Also, on a side note, do you guys think we should remove the symbol tags in
the relations from all the Interstates/US highways they show up in at the same
time?
So, let's get this discussion going!
-James (rickmastfan67)
[1] - http
On Sun, 2013-11-10 at 18:26 -0600, John F. Eldredge wrote:
We probably need a value such as railway=inactive for routes that are
not in use, but still have the rails in place. The only problem is
that, if someone erroneously tags an active but little-used route as
inactive, this could lead
From: marti...@telenav.com
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 11:31:55 -0500
To: rickmastfa...@hotmail.com
CC: ste...@telenav.com; krist...@telenav.com; robe...@telenav.com;
chr...@telenav.com; talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Complex intersection mapping
James,
Thanks
off-list and I'll make sure it's approved
quickly. ;)
-James
From: marti...@telenav.com
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 17:32:06 -0600
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-us] AARoads
Hey all,
I've been eyeballing AARoads, they have very detailed information on
most of the Interstates, US
about driving on the beach?
--
James Doc Livingston
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
there are still Cash lanes, I'm betting the routers direct everybody onto the
E-ZPass Express lanes.
-James___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
the primary_link at the light and adding an
only_straight_on restriction be better here?
-James
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Chris, the QEW has three destinations on the counterclockwise direction. In
addition to having Niagara and Fort Erie, between Toronto and Hamilton, it's
posted for Hamilton. After Hamilton, it then becomes Niagara. I should know,
I've traveled the QEW several times in my life.
-James
From
After hands down. That's how I do intersections like that with one minor
difference. If the road on the right (as in the example) doesn't have a
divider, I merge the ways before leaving the intersection so I would have 3
traffic light nodes instead of 4.
-James
as
I've ever gone).
So, in other words, I wanted to leave it to somebody that knows the Canvec data
better as I've never done an import.
-James
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 19:04:53 -0600
From: ve6...@gmail.com
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Larder Lake, Ontario completely
Anybody want to import this town? It's completely missing in OSM data except
for {66}.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/note/32942
-James
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:15 PM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
Anybody want to import this town? It's completely missing in OSM data
except for {66}.
Why ask someone else to import the town? OSM makes it possible for
everyone and anyone to edit the map. That's one of the main
In a previous e-mail to the list, he said that relations for Turnpikes were
based off the name tag for the relation, while the ones that had numbers
shields were based off the network + ref tags in the relations avoiding the
name tag entirely.
-James
From: lordsu...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 5 Aug
the route
together could be used instead for applying the shields over the separate ways
for each direction.
-James
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
I've seen some data in there that I clearly added back in March of 2012 in the
Pittsburgh, PA area (new exit numbers on PA-28). So, the data isn't 4 years
old like some people suggest.
-James
___
Talk-us
I'm personally not liking that they now have hidden the long/short links to the
map location behind buttons. Instead of just one click to get the map
location, now it's two clicks and is really annoying and slowing down work for
me. :(
-James
your e-mail arrived.
I bet TomH will probably mark it as a duplicate very soon. lol.
-James
From: t...@macwright.org
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 19:09:27 -0400
To: dave...@madasafish.com
CC: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Upgraded map controls
Hi James,
That issue has been reported
Simple, something is wrong with the website. lol. I got nailed by it after I
had typed up a long response to a PM. :(
Seems everything else is working fine, just not the website. So, I'm thinking
there were doing a change to the site, and it fubared it unfortunately. :(
-James
Date: Mon
And now it's back up. :)
-James
From: rickmastfa...@hotmail.com
To: stevag...@gmail.com; talk@openstreetmap.org
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 21:58:58 -0400
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Application error at openstreetmap.org
Simple, something is wrong with the website. lol. I got nailed by it after I
], then that segment would
NOT qualify for the US:I:Future network as it means there is a slim
possibility that alignment might be bypassed. That's happened with several
Future I-74 Corridor alignments.
-James
[0] - http://goo.gl/maps/mMIHW
[1] - http://www.texasfreeway.com/houston/photos/59sw/59sw.shtml
the construction
is finished.
-James
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 18:52:00 -0500
From: ba...@ursamundi.org
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-us] Shield rendering and detours; tagging nicknames?
OK, wonder if we can get orange detour banners for routes as well? Example
relations can be found
Maybe we could add a ref:year tag?
-James
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 19:07:53 -0500
From: ba...@ursamundi.org
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-us] US Historic Route shield rendering
I'm wondering if we can broaden the tagging for US Historic Route 66 and
perhaps retag the existing
and weren't replaced by the
connector shields.
http://elrond.aperiodic.net/shields/?zoom=16lat=30.83972lon=-81.99971layers=Bhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2145405
Think you could get this fixed? -James
On 12/07/13 12:42, Brett Russell wrote:
Hi All
Trouble I been Windows based means even simple things like reading the type
file is made hard until you wake up that Windows default Notepad is useless
as it does not understand line feeds.
You want to get yourself Notepad++ then, it will do
Is there picture proof of how they are signing it?
-James
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 21:43:47 -0400
From: kken...@nycap.rr.com
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Future Interstate Relations
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote:
Given
I know that there is a US 1-9 in NJ, but this error is showing up in NC. ;)
-James
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:07:17 -0500
From: toby.mur...@gmail.com
CC: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Update on highway shield rendering
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:44 AM, James Mast rickmastfa
, here's a quick
link to StreetView showing this: http://goo.gl/maps/DiSfn. Just chock it up to
one of those NCDOT quirks. I mean, they have a Bypass, Business, Alternate,
and vanilla US-70 in the same area (Smithfield, NC)!
-James
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:15:44 -0400
From: phi...@pobox.com
the chance to
add in the :Business and :Bypass to the two children of US-21 there (but
kept the modifier tag). So, those will now render properly on your renderer.
-James
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:15:44 -0400
From: phi...@pobox.com
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Update
Done. Changed it to README=*. Thanks for that suggestion. -James
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:30:06 -0400
From: rwe...@averillpark.net
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Update on highway shield rendering
On 7/11/13 4:20 PM, James Mast wrote:
Just so you know Phil, I've
to upload right now, so here's a StreetView link instead:
http://goo.gl/maps/GeZzo) I was planning on changing them to that network
when I split them from the non-Turnpike segments.
-James
___
Talk-us mailing
There is one other. I mentioned it in my e-mail from yesterday (07-09-13).
That is I-295 in Fayetteville.
http://gribblenation.net/ncfutints/fut295.html
And to be honest, I thought some people wanted the :Future part dropped out
and just put in the modifier area.
-James
Date: Wed, 10
relations,
one for each direction. -James
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 09:14:40 -0400
From: phi...@pobox.com
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Update on highway shield rendering
* James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com [2013-07-10 03:18 -0400]:
I'm just curious, but how
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 09:40:22 -0400
From: phi...@pobox.com
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Update on highway shield rendering
* James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com [2013-07-10 09:22 -0400]:
I could fix the PA Turnpike relation with the US:PA:Turnpike network
a Bypass along I-77 and this
rendering bug isn't happening there.
http://elrond.aperiodic.net/shields/?zoom=14lat=36.24215lon=-80.83527layers=B
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/172380289
-James
___
Talk
suggested
till we all, once and for all, have decided on the way to tag these.
-James
[1] - http://gribblenation.net/ncfutints/fut295.html
From: rickmastfa...@hotmail.com
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:15:36 -0400
Subject: [Talk-us] Future Interstate Relations
.
Not likely, but imaginable.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
I prefer the modifier proposal, since it prevents Future from being confused
with a county level network.
On Jun 24, 2013 11:16 PM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
Later
I thought the modifier would be the type of Business route? Remember, we do
have Business Spurs and Business Loops for Interstate highways. Sometimes
both types in the same city.
-James
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 20:06:58 -0500
From: ba...@ursamundi.org
To: rickmastfa...@hotmail.com
CC: m
There are two Interstate Business Routes in Winslow, AZ for I-40 that intersect
each other.
I-40 Business Spur http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1933534
I-40 Business Loop http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1933535
-James
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 21:41:06 -0500
From: ba
I'll let his comments here[1] on a note page speak.
- James
[1] - http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/note/3173
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
a render
properly put the word Future above the shields!
-James
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 15:28:12 -0400
From: phi...@pobox.com
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] ref tags
* James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com [2013-06-22 07:22 -0400]:
the segment of I-26 between I-240 and Exit #9 is still considered to
be a Future Interstate
allow
us to figure out which is which. -James
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
I'll 2nd what both Mike and Josh have to say.
-James
___
Talk-us mailing
. After reading this discussion I'm going to move forward and
import them.
--
James Fee
480-225-2287
@cageyjames
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.uswrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.comwrote:
Your reply really doesn't
it didn't correctly fix the
map.
-James
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Well, it seems Changeset: 16397959 is legit (minus the missing changeset
comment) since I-269 IS under-construction in that area, well, at least on the
MS side for sure.
http://www.desototimes.com/articles/2013/03/23/news/doc514cf7ea1d8d0663837988.txt
-James
On 01/06/13 14:32, Ian Sergeant wrote:
On 1 June 2013 09:29, Michael James m.ja...@internode.on.net wrote:
There is a legal difference between a divided highway and a freeway in
Australia, so if it is not actually called a freeway/motorway via
signage then it really isn't one.
Firstly
On 29/05/13 22:51, Ian Sergeant wrote:
I'd like to indicate freeway class sections as motorways, however, I can
see the argument to just objectively use the RMS classifications. Will
save edit wars down the track to just have one easy rule.
There is a legal difference between a divided
.
-James
[1] - http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/note/2725
[2] - http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/note/3136
[3] - http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/note/3160
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us
On 29/05/13 10:40, Ben Johnson wrote:
Any thoughts on whether the completed sections of the Newcastle Inner City
Bypass (now being referred to by the RMS as A37 - Newcastle Outer Ring
Road) should be classified as type Motorway …?
If they're calling it A37 then they're not calling it a
and they mentioned that there was a bridge collapse on an Interstate.
-James (rickmastfan67)
From: cliff...@snowandsnow.us
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 16:36:44 -0700
CC: talk@openstreetmap.org; talk...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Google Maps being praised for removing I-5 colasped
bridge quickly
and they mentioned that there was a bridge collapse on an Interstate.
-James (rickmastfan67)
From: cliff...@snowandsnow.us
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 16:36:44 -0700
CC: t...@openstreetmap.org; talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Google Maps being praised for removing I-5 colasped
bridge quickly
them know about OSM pawning
Google here.
-James
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
them know about OSM pawning
Google here.
-James
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
(couldn't hurt to have a second person contact him as well, maybe Mike
N since he lives in SC).
-James (rickmastfan67)
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
that
plans and maintains the trail.
Any preference in the community for how one should tag privately sanctioned
bicycle routes of large extent?
James
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
shortcut on gravel to save 40 miles on
pavement.
It's pretty tough to teach a computer to be as wishy-washy as a human!
--
James
VE6SRV
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
have a chance at knowing where to send you.
It's a challenge to determine whether the routing engine or the
database is to blame for the routing choices. With OSM, we have access
to the database, and only ourselves to blame if the information
required is not in the database! :)
--
James
VE6SRV
Is anybody else having any problems right now accessing it in JOSM? I keep
getting Error messages instead of the tiles. -James
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org
701 - 800 of 1373 matches
Mail list logo
