On 20 Jul 2010, at 01:20, Liz wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, SteveC wrote:
From my experience off list with all the people frustrated both in email
and in person, those 20 or so people here just don't represent everyone
else who'd prefer all this discussion to go to legal-talk and just move on
Hi,
Simon Ward wrote:
For my part, I don’t fully agree with the contributor terms, and I
suggest we start there because they are also what I’ve seen other people
voice their dissent about.
As I said, if you intend to further restrict possible future license
changes via the contributor terms
On 20 July 2010 16:55, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
The contributor terms are linked to the license change question and cannot
be viewed in isolation.
Why not?
It seems like a fairly arbitrary decision to force them to be linked...
I would also like to draw attention to the fact
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 08:55:17AM +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I would also like to draw attention to the fact that OSMF members -
among them, I believe, yourself - have approved the process,
including the current version of the contributor terms, with a 89%
majority in December last year. You
John,
John Smith wrote:
The contributor terms are linked to the license change question and cannot
be viewed in isolation.
Why not?
It seems like a fairly arbitrary decision to force them to be linked...
Please read and understand:
Frederik,
I'm sorry, but idea that PD fans holds all license question hostage
and therefore CT is needed is stupidest thing I ever heard during my
entire life. PD guys need to understand that this project might
*never* submit to PD. As much as I like PD as concept, it is unreal to
implement it in
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Sven Geggus
li...@fuchsschwanzdomain.de wrote:
Tagging is easy. Just add microbrewery=yes to the node or building
area object of your local brewpub.
Whee. Now, please define
That's really for the LWG to answer...
On Jul 19, 2010, at 8:55 PM, Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
2010/7/19 SteveC st...@asklater.com:
Can you restate the question as I don't have mail archives etc here (on my
phone)
Ok, there it goes: I suggest to add SA clause and Attribution clause
as
Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Whee. Now, please define microbrewery and brewpub.
Is this a microbrewery:
http://www.jamessquirebrewhouse.net/melbourne/index.php
It probably is.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microbrewery
If beer is available in supermarkets nationwide I would say
On 20 July 2010 18:17, Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com wrote:
p.s. I still want to hear official word from Steve or anyone about CT
Section 3, even if it is no. But please without PD crowd is mighty
crap
Hmmm so it seems that Fredrick thinks it's ok to loose people as long
as they aren't
Hi,
Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
I'm sorry, but idea that PD fans holds all license question hostage
and therefore CT is needed is stupidest thing I ever heard during my
entire life.
Nobody said anything about holding anything hostage. There's lots of
parties to this agreement and everyone has
John,
John Smith wrote:
Hmmm so it seems that Fredrick thinks it's ok to loose people as long
as they aren't from the pro-PD crowd...
The idea is to try and lose the smallest number of people in the process
while doing what is necessary. This requires that everyone is paid
respect. Telling
I realize that there are others who believe that the lawyers advising OSMF
are wrong, and that CC-BY-SA could indeed be used further. I have doubts
about this and would like the proponents of that idea put forward concrete
plans about how to implement CC-BY-SA in an internationally balanced
On 20 July 2010 18:59, Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com wrote:
Frederik, again you mix it all up. I said i'm fine with ODBL (and so
far everyone who rants about CT says nothing bad about ODBL). I truely
respect huge work putted into it. What I don't like is that CT section
3 practically
Hi,
Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
What I don't like is that CT section 3 practically strips all this
good work away, with having vague definition of new and open
license.
Free and open. And personally, I think that's just about ok - OSM is
about creating a free map of the world, not a share-alike
John,
John Smith wrote:
I'm starting to wonder if this is intentional misdirection
I'm unwilling to continue the discussion on this level. Have a good time.
Bye
Frederik
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Ulf Möller o...@ulfm.de wrote:
Am 17.07.2010 05:07, schrieb Michael Barabanov:
1. Current license does not cover the OSM data (I think that's the OSMF
view). In this case, OSMF can just change to ODBL without asking anyone.
The OSMF has a contractual
On 20 July 2010 18:50, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
The idea is to try and lose the smallest number of people in the process
while doing what is necessary. This requires that everyone is paid respect.
Telling people that they are stupid and their ideas crap is not a good way
to
On 20 July 2010 19:09, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I'm unwilling to continue the discussion on this level. Have a good time.
Sounds like par of the course, you refuse to even think about being
more flexible for current contributors, at least you aren't throwing
personal insults yet.
On 20 July 2010 19:11, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no contract between OSMF and most contributors (excepting newbies
who have signed up to the Contributor Terms)..
Erm since OSM-F does run OSM.org the old contributor agreement saying
you agree to license your work under cc-by-sa would
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:05 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 July 2010 18:59, Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com wrote:
Frederik, again you mix it all up. I said i'm fine with ODBL (and so
far everyone who rants about CT says nothing bad about ODBL). I truely
respect
hi,
I have been trying to download the latest josm for the whole day today - but I
do not even get the 'save or open' dialog box. Is it me? or is there some
problem
--
Regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
Senior Associate
NRC-FOSS at AU-KBC
___
talk mailing
On 20.07.2010 11:12, John Smith wrote:
On one hand you are avidly promoting things should be allowed to go to
PD, on the other hand you keep saying CC-by-SA isn't good enough and
frankly I can't see this logic, either you want PD and in which case
CC-by-SA may be for all intents and purposes
- Original Message -
From: Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org
To: OSM Talk talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 10:27 AM
Subject: [OSM-talk] josm not downloading
hi,
I have been trying to download the latest josm for the whole day today -
but I
do not even get
On Tuesday 20 July 2010 09:10:29 John Smith wrote:
I believe this is the point Steve keeps pointing out, there was no
direct consequences at the time, and people were assuming there is
still outs later if problems were discovered and up until that point
the emphasis was strongly on the new
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I realize that there are others who believe that the lawyers advising OSMF
are wrong, and that CC-BY-SA could indeed be used further. I have doubts
about this and would like the proponents of that idea put forward
Hi,
On 19 July 2010 23:16, Simon Ward si...@bleah.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:04:55PM +0100, Emilie Laffray wrote:
This is the same about anything using contract law. Someone breaking the
contract and redistributing it doesn't remove the contract that is given
with the data. They
Should we continue to name the osm.org tile layers by the renderers
they use? Is overloading the terms mapnik and osmarender as both a
tile layer, style file and rendering library confusing?
The German OSM site refers to the layers as Standard and Alternative,
which removes the confusion but is
Hey All,
It was mentioned to me that I didn't post this to the main talk list.
We are having a SotM for the U.S. in August.
The schedule for SOTM US is up.
http://www.sotm.us/?page_id=2
We have all sorts of exciting things planned. There are talks on
everything from OSM in Government to
Apologies if this has been brought up before.
The last line of para 1 of the contributors terms states You have
explicit permission from the rights holder to submit the Contents.
The use of the word explicit worries me.
To me that would indicate that the rights holder would have to
On 7/20/10, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Should we continue to name the osm.org tile layers by the renderers
they use? [...]
I think we need better names for the current mapnik and osmarender
layers on OSM.org.[...]
What about descriptive names like General, Driving or Default
for
John Smith schrieb:
On 20 July 2010 19:11, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no contract between OSMF and most contributors (excepting newbies
who have signed up to the Contributor Terms)..
Erm since OSM-F does run OSM.org the old contributor agreement saying
you agree to license your work
talk@openstreetmap.org,
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Hi,
On 20 July 2010 01:32, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
The proposed license change makes two concessions to the PD advocates. One
is that you get a (symbolic) chance of officially declaring your
contribution PD. This does not have legal relevance, as you cannot extract
PD data
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
(FWIW I pledge that if I can have a no-CT account (ODbL only), I will
register a second account to make a percentage of my edits in PD,
especially those modifying objects created by others)
Best idea I read so far :)
Stefan
On 20 July 2010 11:07, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
If any
any future time OSM thinks that a non-share-alike license would be best -
why should we, today, try to dictate our wish to them?
Because each of us is an author of a little chunk of data and want to
have a say in how that
Frederik Ramm wrote:
The proposed license change makes two concessions to the PD advocates.
One is that you get a (symbolic) chance of officially declaring your
contribution PD. This does not have legal relevance, as you cannot
extract PD data from an ODbL protected database without
Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Whee. Now, please define microbrewery and brewpub.
It's an if it quacks like a duck question, isn't it?
Most English* breweries (large and small) have historically had a
brewery tap adjacent to the brewery, owned by the brewery which sells
that
Ulf Möller osm at ulfm.de writes:
1. Current license does not cover the OSM data (I think that's the OSMF
view). In this case, OSMF can just change to ODBL without asking anyone.
The OSMF has a contractual relationship with its contributors. So if
there is no copyright protection on the
Hi,
Kai Krueger wrote:
However, it is also not possible to incorporate any datasources
such as e.g. OSM that are compatible with ODbL, as the CT prevent that as it
may move to PD.
I think we have already agreed on having to have exceptions for large
imports, i.e. there will be some data in
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 18:32, Heiko Jacobs heiko.jac...@gmx.de wrote:
John Smith schrieb:
On 20 July 2010 19:11, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no contract between OSMF and most contributors (excepting
newbies
who have signed up to the Contributor Terms)..
Erm since OSM-F does run
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason schrieb:
Is there any official archive of all contributors agreements yet used
in OSM?
This, I think:
http://www.osmfoundation.org/index.php?title=License/Contributor_Termsaction=history
I meant ALL of them including this one the very first mapper
no. 1 has signed
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
So again, either CC-BY-SA 'protects' the data or it does not.
Or it protects the data sometimes, in some jurisdictions, possibly,
depending on who you ask.
___
talk mailing list
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Ken Guest k...@linux.ie wrote:
The huge hint is the text Upstairs, our working micro-brewery
produces only the finest of local hand-crafted beers. :D
Sven said it well:
If beer is available in supermarkets nationwide I would say no and
yes otherwise.
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:49 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
So again, either CC-BY-SA 'protects' the data or it does not.
Or it protects the data sometimes, in some jurisdictions, possibly,
depending on who you ask.
Am 20.07.2010 22:06, schrieb andrzej zaborowski:
On 20 July 2010 11:07, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
If any
any future time OSM thinks that a non-share-alike license would be best -
why should we, today, try to dictate our wish to them?
Because each of us is an author of a
Am 19.07.2010 16:26, schrieb Peteris Krisjanis:
Ok, Frederik, I understand (but don't accept) your arguments here, but
to push discussion in more practical way: what to do with data
providers like Nearmap? How to convince them?
Easy. Keep on mapping and be the bigger fish in a couple years.
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Arun Ganesh arun.plane...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Srikanth Lakshmanan
srik@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
The Ministry of Road Transport and Highways have released the new
scientific numbering scheme[1]. We need to decide if we
Il 19 luglio 2010 19.15, Tiziano D'Angelo tiziano.dang...@gmail.com
ha scritto:
più semplice a farsi che a dirsi:
- CTRL+C per copiare i tag dall'oggetto selezionato
- CTRL+SHIFT+V per incollare i tag sull'oggetto selezionato
ciao
Tiziano
2010/7/19 Stefano Tampieri
Funziona tutto bene però andando a vedere la directory di cache ho notato
che i file vengono salvati comunque come PNG
anche se il link del wms l'ho impostato per scaricare i Jpeg e cioè così :
Ciao a tutti,
hanno messo online i primi tentativi per integrare il routing
direttamente nel sito principale di osm [1], il motore che sta dietro
è ancora perfettibile ma il Project of the week [2] consiglia di
provare ad usarlo in modo che gli sviluppatori abbiano qualche
indicazione sull'uso
Molto interessante!
Il funzionamento non sembra niente male, ma la selezione del mezzo (pubblic
transport) è legata solamente al tipo di mezzo che si sta guidando? Mi
sembra che ignori completamente la presenza di linee di trasporto pubblico
di qualsiasi genere.. bè, adesso mi informo un po'..
Il funzionamento non sembra niente male, ma la selezione del mezzo (pubblic
transport) è legata solamente al tipo di mezzo che si sta guidando? Mi
sembra che ignori completamente la presenza di linee di trasporto pubblico
di qualsiasi genere.. bè, adesso mi informo un po'..
che io sappia per
E' molto più veloce di qualsiasi altra cosa abbia provato!
Per renderlo completo per le bici ci vorrebbe l'estrazione del profilo
altimetrico in stile [1].
Suggerirei inoltre la differenziazione tra bicicletta e MTB.
[1] http://bikeroutetoaster.com/Course.aspx
2010/7/19 ale_z...@libero.it ale_z...@libero.it:
Messaggio originale
Da: stefano.tampi...@gmail.com
Data: 19/07/2010 19.29
A: openstreetmap list - italianotalk-it@openstreetmap.org
Ogg: Re: [Talk-it] Copia Proprietà/Tag
grazie e io che provavo a selezionare i tag e fare copia
che io sappia per ora è solo un test per valutare le richieste
hardware,
Ok
ad esempio mi risulta ignori anche i sensi unici.
Da quanto risulta dai miei pochi e provocatori test vedo che i sensi unici
li rispetta, anche se magari poi non prende la strada che farei io.
Ciao,
Stefano
Ciao a tutti,
vorrei chiedere se qualcuno ha già provato / è riuscito a configurare
geowebcache con i livelli WMS del PCN o di regione lombardia?
Io personalmente ci ho perso qualche ora ma senza risultati...
ciao
andrea
2010/7/18 Francesco de Virgilio fradev...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010
2010/7/20 Federico Cozzi f.co...@gmail.com
2010/7/20 Stefano Pedretti stefano.pedre...@gmail.com:
Per renderlo completo per le bici ci vorrebbe l'estrazione del profilo
altimetrico in stile [1].
E magari anche tenere in conto il profilo altimetrico nel calcolo del
percorso migliore...
Il 20/07/2010 11.02, Stefano Salvador ha scritto:
Ciao a tutti,
hanno messo online i primi tentativi per integrare il routing
direttamente nel sito principale di osm [1], il motore che sta dietro
è ancora perfettibile ma il Project of the week [2] consiglia di
provare ad usarlo in modo che gli
Un buon tool, che potrebbe avvicinare il sito di OSM a quello di GMaps
come usabilità e utilità per l'utente. Però il routing è quantomeno da
tunare.
Il 20/07/2010 13.22, Simone Saviolo ha scritto:
Un buon tool, che potrebbe avvicinare il sito di OSM a quello di GMaps
come usabilit e utilit per l'utente. Per il routing quantomeno da
tunare.
On Tuesday 20 July 2010 13:49:42 G Zamboni wrote:
E' chiaro che è migliorabile, a volte fa anche giri simpatici. (Cosa va a
fare in Via Vicenza??):
http://nroets.dev.openstreetmap.org/demo/index.html?lat=45.62884lon=12.56
A me sembra veramente fatto bene, velocissimo.
A me impostando il tragitto corto riesce a trovare la strada che faccio
sempre io
quando vado al mare mentre tutti i navigatori che ho usato impazziscono e
cercano
sempre di buttarmi sulle statali.
Il giorno 20 luglio 2010 13.59, Stefano Cavallari
Ciao a tutti,
scusate la descrizione poco tecnica :-)
Vorrei mappare una strada che passa su una terrazza. La situazione è
questa: c'è una strada secondaria che attraversa Varazze e costituisce
una via parallela all'Aurelia, all'interno invece che sul lungomare.
Questa strada rimane scavata in
Il 20 luglio 2010 16.45, Simone Saviolo ha scritto:
non vorrei che
altre applicazioni immaginassero che il Teiro o la strada di cui sopra
improvvisamente scendessero sottoterra per passare sotto agli oggetti
sulla terrazza (che sarebbero invece interpretati come livello del
suolo).
Che ne
Il 20 luglio 2010 17.16, Daniele Forsi dfo...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Il 20 luglio 2010 16.45, Simone Saviolo ha scritto:
non vorrei che
altre applicazioni immaginassero che il Teiro o la strada di cui sopra
improvvisamente scendessero sottoterra per passare sotto agli oggetti
sulla terrazza
Ciao,
in [1] ci sono una highway=unclassified e una highway=service che si
immettono su una highway=primary_link. Il risultato è che Mapnik
renderizza le strade minori sopra alle due primary_link, con uno
sgradevolissimo effetto visivo.
Io direi che è un bug di Mapnik. Qualcuno ha qualche idea
Il 20/07/2010 18:07, Simone Saviolo ha scritto:
Ciao,
in [1] ci sono una highway=unclassified e una highway=service che si
immettono su una highway=primary_link. Il risultato è che Mapnik
renderizza le strade minori sopra alle due primary_link, con uno
sgradevolissimo effetto visivo.
Anche
Male Male
Con quelle ortofoto così be definite seppur dalla incoerente georeferenziazione
con il PCN e a volte non riprese zenitalmente come ci si può astenere dal
ricalcare?
Male Male!
Gianfra
To: talk-it@openstreetmap.org
From: magellan...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:51:43
Hi DownTownMapper!
Heute (20. Juli) um 21:29 ließest du verlauten:
Und nun gleich zu meinem ersten Problem:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/24672549
Nun, ich denke da ist wirklich was falsch, ich glaube auch nicht, dass
die Straße wirklich Rechte Bachgasse, Linke Bachgasse heißt.
Hallo Boris,
die Straßenseiten haben tatsächlich verschiedene Namen, ich hab alles mit
dem Rad abgefahren um die GPS Daten zu haben. Ich bin mir daher auch sicher,
dass ich die Daten verbessert habe.
Auf der Homepage von Oberwart ist auch ein Stadtplan (
Servus DownTownMapper!
Heute (20. Juli) um 23:10 ließest du verlauten:
die Straßenseiten haben tatsächlich verschiedene Namen, ich hab
alles mit dem Rad abgefahren um die GPS Daten zu haben. Ich bin mir
daher auch sicher, dass ich die Daten verbessert habe.
Auf der Homepage von Oberwart ist
Dear all
Apologies for cross-posting. As part of my Master's project at Queen
Mary, University of London, I'm looking for participants to take part in
a game centred on wayfinding challenges in urban audio maps.
The game should take no longer than 20 minutes to complete and there
will be a
On 20/07/2010, at 9:10 AM, Emilie Laffray wrote:
To the best of my knowledge, violating a contract and making the data
available doesn't make the data public domain.
Indeed.
The relevant question is then Is hosting a copy of ODbL licensed material
(e.g. a planet dump) on your website without
At some time in the future existing contributors will be asked to agree to
the contributor terms.
The tense of some of those terms concerns me:
From the introductory paragraph ...rights in any Contents that You choose
to submit...
From paragraph 1 You agree to only add
The tense
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 5:26 PM, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.netwrote:
Apologies if this has been brought up before.
The last line of para 1 of the contributors terms states You have
explicit permission from the rights holder to submit the Contents.
Given the scope of the
- Original Message -
From: 80n 80n...@gmail.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 6:43 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Query over contributor terms
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 5:26 PM, David Groom
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
here's an interesting one.
May I add another one? ;-)
Suppose OSM has just changed its license to ODbL. A final CC-BY-SA
planet has been released, non-relicensed data has been removed from the
servers, and the project is again humming along nicely (relief!).
In
Har!
Ik heb vanmorgen de eerste Microbrewery in Nederland toegevoegd:
http://brewpubs.openstreetmap.de/?zoom=7lat=52.04094lon=5.67328layers=BT
Dus ken je ook een kroeg die naast de standaard biertjes ook z'n eigen
bier serveert voeg een microbrewery=yes toe en je komt op deze kaart.
Tof, maar De Bekeerde Suster is toch met een S?
Op 20 juli 2010 17:01 schreef Floris Looijesteijn o...@floris.nu het
volgende:
Har!
Ik heb vanmorgen de eerste Microbrewery in Nederland toegevoegd:
http://brewpubs.openstreetmap.de/?zoom=7lat=52.04094lon=5.67328layers=BT
Dus ken je ook een
Why not use:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:noname
Steve
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com wrote:
I can check Yass on Friday, as the Department of Health and Ageing is
paying
me to drive that way again.
Thanks Liz, that'd be great.
I'll bet a
On 20 July 2010 16:10, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Why not use:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:noname
I was told in the UK they have streets that aren't named, where as in
Australia all streets do have names, I sent an email to this list some
time ago asking for
Dear Liz,
You said in a recent post to a list that you had mapped what was once
a blank spot on the map.
Have you seen the OSM History animations from GeoFabrik?
http://www.geofabrik.de/gallery/history/index.html
If the area that you mapped is not in a current animation, you might
ask them to
On 20 July 2010 22:57, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Asking a local is one option. I go with, I'm so lost. Can you tell
me what street this is?
That only works if there is someone to ask...
Visiting a business and asking for a business card is another option.
Business cards
Dear all
Apologies for cross-posting. As part of my Master's project at Queen
Mary, University of London, I'm looking for participants to take part in
a game centred on wayfinding challenges in urban audio maps.
The game should take no longer than 20 minutes to complete and there
will be a
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, John Smith wrote:
The only places I've seen signs vandalised are usually in residential
locations, Hoylen and myself spotted one the other day during the
mapping party...
Because our Council uses surnames of people to name the roads, others with the
same surname steal
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Richard Weait wrote:
Dear Liz,
You said in a recent post to a list that you had mapped what was once
a blank spot on the map.
Have you seen the OSM History animations from GeoFabrik?
http://www.geofabrik.de/gallery/history/index.html
If the area that you mapped is
On 21 July 2010 07:08, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
I made an animation a couple of years ago, and probably still have a copy.
What is now needed pictorially is the difference with and without my edits.
To do this properly, you need a complete copy of the DB dump which
included all history made
If only public domain was accepted then all of the government's CC
imports would not be possible.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Christoph Donges cdon...@gmail.com wrote:
Things would have been so much simpler if they had gone with pd from the
start.
Personally I consider all my edits (not
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NearMap_PhotoMaps#New_South_Wales.2FVictoria
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On 21 July 2010 14:27, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
If only public domain was accepted then all of the government's CC
imports would not be possible.
I'm not sure how complete it is, but there is a list of data sets and
the licenses:
Am Dienstag 20 Juli 2010, 07:23:44 schrieb Jens Frank:
Am 19. Juli 2010 17:02 schrieb Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de:
Weiter wird dann sogar sowas verblödetes wie ein Fork in die Diskussion
eingebracht. Statt die Arbeit dann in die osm zu stecken und an EINER
freien Weltkarte zu schrauben
Am Dienstag 20 Juli 2010, 01:50:27 schrieb Thomas Ineichen:
Und wer bringt das alles den Rolli-Fahrern bei, die eigentlich nur ein
paar Behinderten-Parkplätze einzeichnen möchten?
ein entsprechendes Preset im Editor?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Moin,
On 20.07.2010 01:50, Thomas Ineichen wrote:
Hallo ihr,
highway=residental
parking:lane:right=inline
capacity:standard=3
capacity:disabled=1
parking:condition:right=residents
parking:condition:right:residents=G
bzw.
highway=residental
parking:lane:right=inline
hi,
habe es herausgefunden, woran es liegt. steigt die horizontale distanz
auf über 180 grad, so gibt geo proj4 bei der transformation der
koordinaten negative werte für maxlon zurück. daraus ergibt sich ein
falsches verhältnis von höhe zu breite, also ein negatives.
so wie es im augenblick
mir ist noch was eingefallen.
evtl. kann man den nullmeridian der projektion auf einen anderen wert
setzen.
im augenblick steht da (in mapgen.pm)
my $l0 = int($l) - 1 ;
der liegt also außerhalb des zu zeichnenden bereichs
vielleicht kann man den so verwursten
my $l0 =
Hallo,
leider hatte es auf der SOTM 2010 nicht mit dem Feedback geklappt -
kleine organisatorische Panne...
Deswegen gibt es einen Aufruf in den News mit der Bitte um Teilnahme:
http://stateofthemap.org/feedback-please/
Dort sind sowohl die Teilnehmer als auch die Nicht-Teilnehmer
heiko.jac...@gmx.de (Heiko Jacobs) am 20.07.10:
Rainer Knaepper schrieb:
Da müssen Fußgänger, Rollifahrer und Radler durch, weil die
benachbarte Hochstraße für selbige verboten ist.
Nö, ist nicht verboten laut OSM! ;-)
Kraftfahrstraßenschild? -- motorroad=yes
explizite Verbotsschilder für
sh...@nurfuerspam.de (Fabian) am 20.07.10:
schonmal die kleinigkeit das garkeine fussgaenger hinkommen weil nur
cycleways hinfuehren.
Dieses radfahrerzentrierte Tagging gibt es hier überall, an allen
Ecken und Enden und auch noch uneinheitlich. Und nein, das stammt
nicht von mir, ich bin eher
Hallo Michael,
gibt es denn schon Erfahrungs- und Erlebnisberichte? (in Deutsch)
Gab es Mitschnitte von Veranstaltungen?
Wo kann man sich diese anschauen/hören?
Gruss, Markus
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
1 - 100 of 261 matches
Mail list logo
