FYI I updated some of the stats charts at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Stats
Cheers
Andy (blackadder)
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Jolly good show Fairhurst. Second that motion.
Chinner.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Fairhurst [mailto:rich...@systemed.net]
Sent: 19 November 2015 15:02
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] A message to our friends at HOT, Peace Corps etc. about
Changeset Comments
Bla
colliar [mailto:colliar4e...@aol.com]
Sent: 24 July 2013 14:14
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Is there some lag in the backend data?
On 24.07.2013 10:39, Andy Robinson wrote:
> From: Maarten Deen [mailto:md...@xs4all.nl]
Would you two please report this at the right pl
I'm seeing this problem in JOSM 6060. To replicate try:
Start JOSM and add an object and upload it. Close JOSM and restart and
reload the same area. Item is missing. Download a second time and object
appears.
Occasionally I don't see the problem but mostly it's there. Checking the map
call data
Follow-ups to talk-gb please
> -Original Message-
> From: hbogner [mailto:hbog...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 10 January 2013 21:32
> To: talk@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: [OSM-talk] Group of croatian mappers is visiting UK
>
> We are participating in a international project to activate youth and
Martijn van Exel [mailto:m...@rtijn.org]
> Sent: 18 December 2012 19:28
> To: Johan C
> Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Marketshare Downloads in 48 Hours>
> 3) There is no step three. Or maybe there is. Add your favorite
ingredient.
NUTS!, a liberal handful of nuts.
:-)
I had a problem accessing one of my Etrex devices. It transpired it didnt
like the cable I was using though the same cable worked fine with another
unit. I changed the cable and all was well again.
Cheers
Andy
From: Emir Hartato [mailto:emir.hart...@gmail.com]
Sent: 01 December 2012 05:4
I can't be certain but I suspect any Garmin unit that takes a micro SD card
can store a daily gpx tracklog file nowadays.
Cheers
Andy
> -Original Message-
> From: Tapio Sokura [mailto:oh2...@iki.fi]
> Sent: 03 July 2012 03:27
> To: talk@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: [OSM-talk] Current Garm
But why does this need special treatment? We don't do it for any other mode
of transport.
Cheers
Andy
From: Richard Mann [mailto:richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com]
Sent: 10 May 2012 10:08
To: Richard Fairhurst
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OSM cycle map - ?excessive f
Robert Whittaker (OSM) [mailto:robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com] wrote:
> Sent: 09 May 2012 09:08
> To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
> Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] Attributing Sources used in OSM
>
> I've just been given permission to use some UK Local Government data
> relating to Public Foo
From: Richard Fairhurst [mailto:rich...@systemed.net]
> Sent: 09 March 2012 14:17
> To: talk@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] No attribution on osm.org?
>
> Andrew Ayre wrote:
> > I can't imagine why the majority wouldn't agree on improving
> > attribution.
>
> I think the attribution
If you refer to old OS maps the location of the place name seems most often
to be positioned in relation to certain specific features. Where there is a
parish church they seem to use that, where not its often the post office or
the village pub, if none of these are present then some central other
c
Have updated
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Stats#Database_Statistics_-_Graphical
500k OSM user signups is quite a milestone in the project.
Cheers
Andy
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
I get this problem too, seems to stick completely even over a day or two
until I clear the relevant cached data. Then it seems to be ok for me. As
you say, seems to be a bigger issue at higher zoom.
Cheers
Andy
> -Original Message-
> From: David Earl [mailto:da...@frankieandshadow.com]
>
Richard Fairhurst [mailto:rich...@systemed.net] wrote:
> Sent: 09 October 2011 21:16
> To: talk@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OpenMaps App Blocked By OpenStreetMap
snip
>
> However, if a bunch of OSM activists want to get sponsorship _outside_
> OSMF to set up a tile-serving co-op w
Andrew Guertin [mailto:andrew.guer...@uvm.edu] wrote:
> Sent: 07 October 2011 17:08
> To: talk@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Jerusalem name tag - Mediation
>
> On 10/07/2011 11:40 AM, Andy Robinson wrote:
> > I'm going to suggest the latter, three nodes
vm.edu]
> > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Jerusalem name tag - Mediation
> >
> > On 10/07/2011 11:40 AM, Andy Robinson wrote:
> > > I'm going to suggest the latter, three nodes as follows: [...]
> >
> > Any solution should probably apply to relations as w
In addition to the talk list and the DWG this email is being sent to those
who have edited the name tag on node 29090735.
Those reading the mailing list and forum will know that there is an on-going
dispute between Israeli and Palestinian folks as well as unhappiness with
the OSMF DWG. All relates
Frederik Ramm [mailto:frede...@remote.org] wrote:
> Sent: 05 October 2011 18:51
> To: talk@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Naming dispute over Jerusalem - OSM failure
>
> Andy Robinson has been called in to mediate in this situation but
mediation
> requir
Have to admit I'm a inclined to be a little lazy and often just add two
nodes after the stub rather than a fixme.
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Richard Fairhurst [mailto:rich...@systemed.net]
Sent: 05 October 2011 13:46
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Fixme: A p
Cool!
Cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: juliocos...@gmail.com [mailto:juliocos...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
>Julio Costa Zambelli
>Sent: 26 September 2011 1:56 PM
>To: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
>Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org; talk...@openstreetmap.org
>S
An unmapped area in OSM currently is the Antarctic Peninsular south of
Argentina. Thanks to the National Library of Australia I have a number of
mostly out of copyright (or nearly so) British Ordnance Survey Maps for the
British Antarctic Territories . The full list of them can be found here:
http:
I'd place the coastline at the low water mark because you know then that its
always true. The coastline at the high water mark is only true a couple of
times a day or whatever. Then it needs a high_water_mark way adding and
ideally rendered in the long run.
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
Graham Jones [mailto:grahamjones...@gmail.com] wrote:
>Sent: 22 February 2011 9:01 PM
>To: Roland Olbricht
>Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] XAPI and using a home server
>
>Roland,
>Thanks for this - I had never heard of OSM3S. I'll have a look at it.
>It sounds as though the d
Frederik Ramm wrote:
>Sent: 16 June 2010 6:22 PM
>To: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
>
>Hi,
>
>Frank Sautter wrote:
>> WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
>> http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Berlin
>
>Interesting, they seem to have their ow
Richard Weait wrote:
>Sent: 16 June 2010 8:42 PM
>To: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
>
>On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Frank Sautter
> wrote:
>> WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
>> http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Berlin
>
>Nice catch
Gregory wrote:
>Sent: 06 April 2010 6:18 AM
>To: John Smith
>Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] River boundaries , not Post code areas
>
>
>
>On 5 April 2010 20:35, John Smith wrote:
>
>
> On 6 April 2010 13:19, Liz wrote:
> > The river can move, but leave the boundar
You will find links and info from this morning on the talk-gb list
Cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
>boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Lester Caine
>Sent: 01 April 2010 11:06 AM
>To: OSM Talk
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Ordnance Surve
Slap on the back all round I think. I'll raise a glass at the Brum social
tomorrow night :-)
Cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-gb-
>boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Richard Fairhurst
>Sent: 31 March 2010 9:36 PM
>To: talk@openstr
Well, you wouldn't be saying that if you had to sift through those 300
emails yourself!
Cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: dev-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:dev-boun...@openstreetmap.org]
>On Behalf Of Graham Jones
>Sent: 17 March 2010 6:14 PM
>To: SteveC
>Cc: dev list; Talk Open
Original Message-
>From: Tom Hughes [mailto:t...@compton.nu]
>Sent: 16 March 2010 8:51 AM
>To: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
>Cc: 'IgnacioZ'; 'osm'
>Subject: Re: Getting 403-Forbidden from my app that WAS on sale onthe
>appstore
>
>On 16/03/10 08:41,
Be aware also of the Acceptable Use Policy:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tile_usage_policy
Cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
>boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of IgnacioZ
>Sent: 16 March 2010 1:41 AM
>To: osm
>Subject: [OSM-tal
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
>Sent: 12 March 2010 7:07 AM
>To: Al Haraka
>Cc: Talk Openstreetmap
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] GSoC'10
>
>
>
>On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 5:11 AM, Al Haraka wrote:
>
>
> > It's completely not the "osm way" *as I interpret it* and isn't
>going to fly
Bruce,
here is your starting point:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapnik
As well as
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osmarender
Cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
>boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Foster
>Sent: 09 M
8.8 strength earthquake hit the coastal area of Chile 3 hours ago. No news
for the epicentre but understood to be around Concepción, Thanks to OSM that
area is quite well mapped but only roads and the basics.
http://osm.org/go/MOVHuQ7-
--
Cheers
Andy
_
Simon Hewison wrote:
>Sent: 26 February 2010 10:55 AM
>To: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] will walkingpapers printed on black and white work?
>
>On 26/02/2010 08:25, maning sambale wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am using walking-papers printed on black& white laser printing but
>> I didn't
David Fawcett wrote:
>Sent: 04 February 2010 2:30 PM
>To: John Smith
>Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Request for user block
>
>I think that that it would be useful to have a dedicated email
>account(s) or Web form(s) for reporting map abuse and wiki spam. That
>would limit the
Frederik Ramm wrote:
>Sent: 03 February 2010 11:38 AM
>To: Richard Fairhurst
>Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Nav4All navigation shut down by Navteq
>
>Hi,
>
>Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>> That is 300 times more open to misinterpretation than the cycleway
>example.
>> Yet we
Martijn van Exel [mailto:mve...@gmail.com] wrote:
>Sent: 17 December 2009 4:04 PM
>To: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
>Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Contribution graph
>
>Intriguing, Andy. Thanks for adding this.
>Would be nice to be able to filter out
I've added another OSM graph to the stats page. It shows the % contribution
of ways (current table, no account for history) per editor. It reveals that
95% of the way data is contributed by just 10% of the contributor base. In
fact 50% of way data has been contributed by just 31 user accounts altho
The English term for that is a "causeway".
see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causeway
Cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
>boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Martin Fossdal Guttesen
>Sent: 30 November 2009 2:04 PM
>To: talk@openstreetm
Andy Allan [mailto:gravityst...@gmail.com] wrote:
>Sent: 12 November 2009 2:15 PM
>To: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
>Cc: Ian Dees; OSM Talk; talk...@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Addressing Question
>
>> Ian Dees wrote:
>>>Hi everyone,
>>>
Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
>Sent: 12 November 2009 7:35 AM
>To: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] changes not appearing in osm
>
>On Thursday 12 Nov 2009 12:56:58 pm Jukka Rahkonen wrote:
>> > I find that changes made even 5-6 days ago are not showing up either in
>> > mapnik or in osm
Ian Dees wrote:
>Sent: 12 November 2009 1:13 AM
>To: OSM Talk; talk...@openstreetmap.org Openstreetmap
>Subject: [OSM-talk] Addressing Question
>
>Hi everyone,
>
>I'm looking at some donated street centerline data that has addressing data
>in the form of "Right/Left From Addr" and "Right/Left To Ad
David Earl wrote:
>Sent: 11 November 2009 4:05 PM
>To: Ed Avis
>Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Apostrophist corrects punctuation on street signs
>
>On 11/11/2009 14:31, Ed Avis wrote:
>> Frustrated by living in "St Johns Close", in Turnbridge Wells, Mr Gatward
>> decided to buy
Take a look at how the 1:25,000 UK mapping is being rectified. Link on that
out of copyright page you quoted.
Cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
>boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Valent Turkovic
>Sent: 26 October 2009 12:21 PM
>To
Shaun,
You mean the examples Bev gave aren't good enough?
Cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
>boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Shaun McDonald
>Sent: 22 October 2009 2:13 PM
>To: Bev M Ewen-Smith
>Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject
Frederik Ramm wrote:
>Sent: 16 October 2009 10:30 AM
>To: Grant Slater
>Cc: Talk OSM
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Older planet files (from 2007)?
>
>Hi,
>
>Grant Slater wrote:
>> Brief API (+data format) history...
>> 0.3 -> (remove segments?) 0.4 -> (+relations) 0.5 -> (+changesets) 0.6
>
>No, 0.3 and
n and are looking for donations to cover the £800
cost of the acquisition. More, and a donate link, in the blog.
Cheers
Andy
Andy Robinson
Treasurer
OpenStreetMap Foundation
0777 553 7872
a...@osmfoundation.org
Name & Registered Office:
Openstreetmap Foundation
16 Oakfield Glade
Weybridge
Su
Any particular part of the site? The site is accessible for me and I printed
off a sheet the other day. I haven't however uploaded a scan and I note the
last scan in the list on the site is 11 days ago now. Maybe that's your
problem?
Cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: talk-boun...@o
John Smith wrote:
>Sent: 01 October 2009 3:23 PM
>To: Frederik Ramm
>Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] SteveC should decide
>
>2009/10/2 Frederik Ramm :
>
>> The idea behind that (and correct me if I'm wrong) is that anyone makes
>> their own decisions (just like now) and in cases
Frederik Ramm wrote:
>Sent: 01 October 2009 3:13 PM
>To: Matt Amos
>Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] SteveC should decide
>
>Hi,
>
>Matt Amos wrote:
>> i absolutely agree. i'd also defend frederik's right to say "this is
>> the Frederik Ramm approved tagging scheme" without catch
Matt Amos wrote:
>Sent: 01 October 2009 2:25 PM
>To: Russ Nelson
>Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] SteveC should decide
>
>On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Russ Nelson wrote:
>> Andy Allan writes:
>> > can win, and I decided about 6 months ago to ignore (or at least not
>> > ri
Dave F. wrote:
>Sent: 29 September 2009 10:29 PM
>To: Peter Childs
>Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Field boundaries
>
>Peter Childs wrote:
>> 2009/9/28 Mark Williams :
>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> courtland.yoc...@mindspring.com wrote:
>>>
>>
Peter Childs wrote:
>Sent: 28 September 2009 3:42 PM
>Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Field boundaries
>
>2009/9/28 Mark Williams :
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> courtland.yoc...@mindspring.com wrote:
>>> I've been thinking a bit about this from a ver
Dave F. wrote:
>Sent: 24 September 2009 6:36 PM
>Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Field boundaries
>
>Mike Harris wrote:
>> Dave makes a good point - the most important thing for walkers in farmed
>> rural areas is often to know on which side of the hedge / fence they
>ought
>> t
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
>Sent: 24 September 2009 10:30 AM
>To: Mike Harris
>Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Field boundaries
>
>Hi Mike,
>
>>OS one-inch (or 1:50k) mapping does not show field boundaries. But is
>anyone working on out-of-copyright 1:25k (or larger scale) mapping?
>
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
>Sent: 30 September 2009 8:56 AM
>To: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: [OSM-talk] Mobile countryside surveying tool
>
>Hello everyone,
>
>With all the talk of countryside surveying issues recently (placement of
>hedges etc) I'm wondering if it would be a good idea to develop s
David Paleino wrote:
>Sent: 29 September 2009 12:26 AM
>To: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Cc: talk...@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] How *NOT* to map
>
>David Paleino wrote:
>
>> http://osm.org/go/xZaERTJSm--
>
>Ah, I forgot also this one:
>
>http://osm.org/go/xZYvzIcHP--
>
>NOT THE WAY TO DO
Chris Hill wrote:
>Sent: 25 September 2009 4:02 PM
>To: OSM Talk
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Breach of Copyright?
>
>Dave F. wrote:
>> Chris Hill wrote:
>>
>>> Dave F. wrote:
>>>
>>>
Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 25/09/09 13:16, Dave F. wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> I had an e
It does seem that what is needed here is not the definitive map but rather
the survey data the two surveyors gathered. As others have said if that data
has been overlain onto an OS map there is no way of knowing what is derived
and what is not. Not unless the bod from the council is prepared to sti
Chris Hill wrote:
>Sent: 25 September 2009 3:08 PM
>To: OSM Talk
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Breach of Copyright?
>
>Dave F. wrote:
>> Tom Hughes wrote:
>>
>>> On 25/09/09 13:16, Dave F. wrote:
>>>
>>>
I had an email conversation with the mapping officer from my local
council. He intimated t
Ian Dees wrote:
>Sent: 24 September 2009 9:35 PM
>To: Laurence Penney
>Cc: Talk OSM
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Distance to opacity (OT)
>
>
>
>On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Laurence Penney wrote:
>
>
> Was "Re: [OSM-talk] Should Bridges be independent of their ways?"
> >> Well, let's
I've left my HCX on in flights more than once. I get a very nice trace if
it's facing up and sitting in my hand luggage in the overhead locker. I
really must remember to turn the darn thing off when boarding a flight as I
really don't like the idea of taking it out and doing so during the flight
;-
A reminder that our main project servers will be offline this weekend (see
details below).
Wiki is currently creaking under strain but should be available along with
the mailing lists over the weekend.
Enjoy you edit free weekend. Go out and map lots instead :-)
Please pass the message around ag
Mike Collinson wrote:
>Sent: 21 August 2009 4:11 PM
>To: OSM
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Awards
>
>At 16:33 21/08/2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> 2009/8/21 Frederik Ramm :
>> > Â Â I just stumpled across this list of awards that Wikipedia seem to
>> > have for their contributors:
>> > http://en.w
ega
>Sent: 20 August 2009 12:59 PM
>To: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] New Hi Vis Vests available
>
>El Jueves, 20 de Agosto de 2009, John Smith escribió:
>> --- On Thu, 20/8/09, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
> wrote:
>> > If anyone would like to pu
David Earl wrote:
>Sent: 20 August 2009 1:31 PM
>To: osm
>Subject: [OSM-talk] SOTM videos
>
>I'd like to be able to refer some people to the Surrey Heath DC
>presentation (James Rutter) talk at SOTM. Any chance it could be
>available any time soon?
+1
Cheers
Andy
__
xt week so please don't respond with a
request to this email unless I will see you on Saturday.
We have 200 vests available and more can be ordered, so there are plenty to
go around.
Cheers
Andy Robinson
(blackader)
___
talk mailing list
talk@op
here's my thoughts.
If object is no longer present we need some sort of "ghost" tagging, and the
ghost tag take precedent when rendering. This means that the data that was
present is still available, its useful data after all. Ideally there would
be a start_date and end_date tag also that defines
John Smith wrote:
>Sent: 30 July 2009 10:42 AM
>To: OJ W; m...@koppenhoefer.com
>Cc: OSM Talk
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Google StreetView From Bikes
>
>
>
>
>--- On Thu, 30/7/09, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>> > Maybe the big tricycle is needed to lift the cameras
>> up above the traffic?
>>
>> I
Nice work Dave :-)
If you are looking for inspiration of what to map next, then the
mappa-mercia [1] page on the wiki gives a few mini project ideas. After we
completed the Birmingham base map last year we started looking at new ideas
and so far that's what we've come up with. Certainly keeps a fl
Please forward to your local lists and provide translation as required.
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Andy Robinson (OSMF) [mailto:a...@osmfoundation.org]
Sent: 28 July 2009 8:37 PM
To: 'osmf-t...@openstreetmap.org'
Subject: OPENSTREETMAP FOUNDATION - NOTICE OF ANNU
gahhh,
>>Did you mean impo...@osmfoundation.org perhaps?
>>
>
>Which I've just realised is not yet set up. Have now done so.
>
Actually it is. I just can't read the control panel properly ;-)
Cheers
Andy
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Tom Hughes wrote:
>Sent: 11 July 2009 9:01 AM
>To: Russ Nelson
>Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org; Hillsman,Edward
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] A possible way to promote OSM
>
>On 11/07/09 09:42, Russ Nelson wrote:
>> On Jul 9, 2009, at 2:02 PM, Hillsman, Edward wrote:
>>> By the way, whom in the OSM network
Eugene Alvin Villar [mailto:sea...@gmail.com] wrote:
>Sent: 17 July 2009 4:56 PM
>To: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
>Cc: SteveC; Frederik Ramm; Talk Openstreetmap
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] The future of bugs in OSM
>
>
>
>On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Andy Robinson (b
Shaun McDonald [mailto:sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk] wrote:
>Sent: 17 July 2009 4:20 PM
>To: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
>Cc: 'SteveC'; 'Frederik Ramm'; 'Talk Openstreetmap'
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] The future of bugs in OSM
>
>
>On 17 Jul 200
Shaun McDonald [mailto:sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk] wrote:
>Sent: 17 July 2009 2:30 PM
>To: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
>Cc: 'SteveC'; 'Frederik Ramm'; 'Talk Openstreetmap'
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] The future of bugs in OSM
>
>Bug should be separa
Any reason why we don't just put the bugs in osm. They could be nodes, ways
or polygons and just have a suitable bug=description key value pair plus any
other tags need (date opened/closed etc). I accept that the editors would
need to handle the data a little differently and their might be a need t
Awesome. I suited up before trying but re-entry was a breeze ;-)
Cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
>boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Frederik Ramm
>Sent: 17 July 2009 1:09 AM
>To: Talk Openstreetmap
>Subject: [OSM-talk] Walking Pap
Tim Waters (chippy) wrote:
>Sent: 09 July 2009 10:34 AM
>To: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
>Cc: openstreetmap
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Mapping party suggestion for SOTM
>
>2009/7/9 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason :
>> A few months ago in some local news media a talking head claimed that
>> Amsterdam's Red Light
Ken Guest wrote:
>Sent: 08 July 2009 8:50 AM
>To: Mike Collinson
>Cc: Talk Openstreetmap
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] SteveC; C = Cool
>
>and it's far too noisy...
>
Following a storm there is always too much flotsam.
Cheers
Andy
___
talk mailing list
ta
The logo is also now trademarked. I'll raise this (and have also copied to
Matt) as currently we don't have a policy on reuse of the logo.
Cheers
Andy Robinson
Secretary
OSMF
>-Original Message-
>From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
>boun...@openstreetma
More OJW wizardry
Thanks Oliver, nice tool
Cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
>boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of OJ W
>Sent: 06 July 2009 8:58 PM
>To: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: [OSM-talk] New static-maps API
>
>Various people
Simon,
I think you probably should be emailing this to CM. So have done so for you.
Cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
>boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of si...@mungewell.org
>Sent: 02 July 2009 12:54 AM
>To: talk@openstreetmap.org
>
I'm not available unfortunately.
Cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: Ciarán Mooney [mailto:general.moo...@googlemail.com]
>Sent: 23 June 2009 1:26 PM
>To: talk; talk-gb-westmidlands; talk-gb; shaun; Andy Robinson (blackadder-
>lists)
>Subject: UKUUG - Summer
Hi Saul,
Check out http://fridav.ljudmila.org/wiki/Main_Page
Cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
>boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Saul Albert
>Sent: 12 June 2009 3:22 PM
>To: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: [OSM-talk] Bike survey
Jochen,
If they are webmaster related then for now I would forward them to Grant.
I'll discuss with him about setting up a proper webmaster@ address than gets
fed to the technical team.
Cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
>boun...@openstre
Peter Miller wrote:
>Sent: 02 June 2009 5:31 PM
>To: Talk Openstreetmap
>Subject: [OSM-talk] When is a road a secondary road and when is it not?
>
>
>I have used primary, secondary and tertiary to indicate relative
>traffic levels on roads in Ipswich rather than any strict
>classification. For exam
Oooh, Kings Lynn was my old knocking ground from college days and my parents
are just 15 miles away. Plenty around that area still to map. Will see if I
can massage it into my schedule.
Cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-gb-
>boun...@ope
Jehan Pagès wrote:
>Sent: 20 May 2009 1:24 PM
>To: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Hello from a probably new contributor
>
>Hi again,
>
>an additionnal question. As I said, I won't take time to use a computer, so
>I won't edit my own tracks, just upload them. But sometimes I may go
Jehan Pagès wrote:
>Sent: 20 May 2009 12:50 PM
>To: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: [OSM-talk] Hello from a probably new contributor
>
>Hi all,
>
>my name is Jehan. I am currently making a world tour. Making lastly a small
>part of my trip with some Mozilla guys (you can see me here:
>http://blogs
I've emailed the BNSC to obtain the correct contact details for the TopSat
team. Will see what comes back.
Cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
>boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Peter Miller
>Sent: 18 May 2009 9:29 AM
>To: Matt Amos
>
Pieren,
A new OSMF Working Group is being formed to support groups and individuals
with the import of new public and private data. I've copied SteveC who will
be leading the group so that your email reaches the new groups radar.
Cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: talk-boun...@openst
...@osmfoundation.org with your contact details.
Cheers
Andy
[1]
http://foundation.openstreetmap.org/memorandum-of-association/articles-of-as
sociation/
Andy Robinson
Secretary
OpenStreetMap Foundation
0777 553 7872
a...@osmfoundation.org
Name & Registered Office:
Openstreetmap Foundation
16 Oakf
Just a small correction to Gregory's note, Sunday is of course May 3rd.
Hope to see some of you on Sat or Sun.
Cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
>boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Gregory
>Sent: 30 April 2009 7:56 PM
>To: Talk
Alan Wright wrote:
>Sent: 30 April 2009 9:43 PM
>To: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] What is OSM and what isn't?
>
>
>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Alan Wright
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I think OpenStreetMap needs a "shop window" - perhaps a different
>website
>>> altogether.
Moved to Talk.
Jochen Topf wrote
>Sent: 30 April 2009 8:41 AM
>To: d...@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: [OSM-dev] What is OSM and what isn't?
>
>The discussion on using Cloudmade routing on the OSM website points to a
>deeper question: What is the OpenStreetMap project and how do we want
>to present i
date progress keep an eye on the front page of the wiki or drop in
on IRC to #OSM
For more information on the upgrade see:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Protocol_Version_0.6/Information
Cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) [mailto
the original post. This
change will be effective once the API 0.6 upgrade has been completed.
Please read the original posting below for further details of this change.
For and on behalf of the OpenStreetMap Foundation Board
Andy Robinson
Secretary
OpenStreetMap Foundation
0777 553 7872
a
1 - 100 of 479 matches
Mail list logo
