On 27/5/21 9:03 pm, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Look, as a dev as well, yes this is absolutely doable.
If this were a one click addon to an overpass query or otherwise
massively dropped the barriers for non devs, fantastic.
But at least for me personally, the folks like us that can do a data
On 25/5/21 4:41 pm, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
I'd make a polite argument there is still value in at least the suburb,
possibly postcode being still provided. When exporting data via
overpass as CSV; it's not currently easy or obvious to appropriately
bring in the parent attributes; even if it is
On 21/5/21 9:23 pm, Andrew Harvey via Talk-au wrote:
For now the iD preset doesn't show the any inherited attributes, so
it will prompt mappers to supply these fields. While it might be
redundant, it's also not wrong, would you go so far as removing these
fields other mappers manually add?
OK, this time I'll reply to the list, so apologies to Graeme for the
duplication.
Well we've got:
Lane Avenue
Lane Court
Lane Crescent
Lane Grove
Lane Lane
Lane One Road
Lane Place
Lane Road
Lane Street
Lane Two Road
Lane Way
Avenue Lane
Avenue Road
Avenue Street
Street Lane
On 27/11/20 11:15 am, Andrew Hughes wrote:
This subject has a long-running chequered past that hasn't reached a
conclusion
It reached a conclusion quite a long time ago. The argument was about
what to tag the waterway with to indicate that there is a culvert. I
don't think there has ever
On 10/11/2020 9:08 am, Andrew Harvey wrote:
There was some work going on at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TfNSW_Data_Imports which I don't
think made it to the list. So this is the perfect opportunity to raise
it on the list and if there are any concerns or discussions for that
import,
On 25/10/20 12:21 pm, Philip Mallis wrote:
What would be the best way to map this in OSM?
Try the lanes extension tagging:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/lanes_General_Extension
Assuming that it's mapped as two one-way ways and there are two through
car lanes at the
On 23/10/20 3:38 pm, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
You could also find (shock, horror!) that that tag has been used for
rendering purposes.
Or, even more shockingly, the tag has been used because they are nature
reserves.
___
Talk-au mailing list
On 30/9/20 2:51 pm, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
Thanks, whoever did it all! :-)
Thanks have to go to Andrew Harvey for persisting till we got approval
from PSMA, and also for his code for converting them to OSM format. I
thought his idea of using TopoJSON was great.
I've still got the NT
On 17/9/20 5:36 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
So while I'd prefer using ref: I guess some psma specific tag
could be okay.
Do you have a preference between ref: and note: ?
So you're suggesting 1) uploading duplicate state borders, and then
cleanup after import or 2) doing the upload so that it
On 15/9/20 10:53 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
1. psma:loc_pid. Where this is a stable ID that is used as a reference,
the existing ref tag is better for this. If we want to be more specific
then ref:psma or something like that would work. No need to invent new
tags here when one already exists,
On 15/9/20 10:53 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
1. psma:loc_pid. Where this is a stable ID that is used as a reference,
the existing ref tag is better for this. If we want to be more specific
then ref:psma or something like that would work. No need to invent new
tags here when one already exists,
On 4/9/20 3:55 pm, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
So does that make 2255 / 222 / or a different tally?
It's 222 but I'm not sure how you got that, I get 200. Did you use
"amenity=hospital in Queensland" in the wizard?
___
Talk-au mailing list
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 12:53 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
> I did an Overpass search for Qld & found ~2100 "hospitals", which seems
> like a lot? https://overpass-turbo.eu/# (Don't know if that works or
> not?), & checking at random, found more Ambo's, Doctor's surgeries & so on
> also
On 2/09/2020 7:59 pm, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-au wrote:
BTW, if he is serial offender why noone ever commented on their talk page?
Because people have been using changeset comments to try an engage with
the user:
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=438078
On 2/09/2020 10:38 am, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
Did a bit of searching & it appears it was only changed on 15/7/20, but
no, I certainly don't remember any discussion?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Admin_level_10=prev=2012028
Makes reference to "Australian
On 18/7/20 8:13 pm, Sebastian Spiess wrote:
Hello,
is anyone else having issues with NSW LPI images not loading in JOSM?
This also seems to be the case for iD.
Their main website also seems to be down at present:
https://www.spatial.nsw.gov.au/
On 16/7/20 9:49 am, Bren Barnes wrote:
Morning, apparently it's amenity=licensed_club according to tagging
guidelines.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Licensed_Club
Thanks for that. A lot less painful than I was expecting.
A question for the brains trust: how do you tag a registered club?
There are a number of these in Canberra and they have been tagged
community_centre, pub, nightclub, restaurant, etc.
How are you tagging these? Does it depend on if the club is sports
based, RSL, ethnic group, and so on? Or
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 6:28 PM Andrew Harvey
wrote:
> I was not aware we had permission to use this service, we have permission
> to use the data, but I didn't know the API endpoint was for public use. It
> looks like the service is down, we could ask the vicmap people if we can
> use this
Would you check to see if it's now pointing at the right layer. You'll have
to refresh the list of imagery in JOSM to update first.
It doesn't seem to have labels but, as I've never used this layer before, I
don't know if it should.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 5:58 PM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 9:27 AM wrote:
> This looks to me to be unqualified permission. There is no mention of
> CC-BY-SA and I would expect that their permission to continue till
> they revoked it.
>
> The licence change over was opt-in not opt-out.
On 26/4/20 11:28 pm, Daniel Pocock wrote:
I asked on the talk-gb list and this was discussed before, they did get
a response from CWGC in 2010:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2020-April/024456.html
contains this link:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 7:52 AM Daniel Pocock wrote:
> The CWGC copyright notice appears to be compatible with a bulk import of
> their cemetery data.
>
The copyright notice explicitly says you can only use it for personal use.
> For the other data sources, I suggest it may not be case of
I would suggest that you have a read through this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On 9/4/20 5:40 pm, Nemanja Bracko (E-Search) wrote:
Anyway, back to roundabouts...
When approaching to roundabout, you will see at least one signpost which
informs you that you approaching to the roundabout. It will look like this:
https://tinyurl.com/uam667d
and then, within the roundabout
On 6/4/20 10:29 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
route relations I can understand, personally I'd just leave off the
roundabout from the relation, easy enough to infer the route in between,
but how would that work for a destination_sign? I guess the roundabout
is always oneway so adding the whole
On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 10:52 PM Nemanja Bracko (E-Search) via Talk-au <
talk-au@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>
> I would ask users to try not to brake existing relations, and to note that
> multiple ways can be a part of single roundabout so it is not necessary to
> join these.
>
Vice versa it is
Add:
noname=yes
It's just another example of a validator that's not quite smart enough.
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:02 AM Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> OT to relations but on the subject of roundabouts, I've noticed that they
> are now (or possibly always have been?) appearing in at least OSM
On 20/03/2020 7:54 am, Andy Mabbett wrote:
which does *not* imply that if there is a addr:housenumber there
should be no addr:housename, but on the contrary indicates that the
two properties can be used at the same time.
That's also how I read it.
On 9/3/20 5:49 pm, Ewen Hill wrote:
Andrew,
A huge thanks to you
I'll second that.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On Mon, 24 Feb 2020, 11:34 Ben Kelley, wrote:
> Don't forget the blue and white signs!
>
> Practically I'd map a lcn=yes tag (or relation) for blue & white signs.
>
I'm not a Sydney rider so I'll ask an apparently dumb question. What blue
and white signs are we talking about here?
>
On 18/02/2020 5:11 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
I hold the view that access=yes just means either physical or legal
access is allowed (or at least not forbidden), whereas access=designated
implies that it's signposted or otherwise explicitly designed/used
for/by that mode.
I'm good with the
On 18/02/2020 4:20 pm, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
Still mapping away for bushfire areas, this time in Blue Mountains, &
just wondering how up-to-date the LPI Imagery is? Could it be post-fires?
There is a overlay available in iD (and JOSM) that shows the LPI imagery
dates. For your area it
On 18/02/2020 3:44 pm, Ash Logan wrote:
In line with this, I've drafted an osmosis TagTransform file that can
turn the raw TfNSW dataset (after being run through JOSM's OpenData
plugin, for example) and turn it into the usual OSM tagging schema.
Check it out:
Question: do we have a community
On 18/2/20 5:44 am, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-au wrote:
I would use landuse=industrial industrial=* as it is in form easier to
actually use
I can see the attraction of using a tag that will be rendered, however I
don't think you can call a pile of rocks "industrial". Nothing happens
to
On 17/2/20 7:13 pm, Jonathon Rossi wrote:
What about a stockpile? And material=gravel/dirt/sand/...?
landuse=stockpile
resource=aggregate ?
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On 7/2/20 12:31 am, Andrew Harvey wrote:
While that's true, I don't see that a reason not to try. In my eyes it's
no different to someone who maps out all the shops in a retail area,
which also will go out of date quickly.
Not really a good example as I would also question the utility of
On 6/2/20 8:39 pm, Ewen Hill wrote:
The states have sent out a rapid impact assessment teams to all areas
now and have followed up with detailed analysis in most. We know what
has been damaged, destroyed and what was inhabited, what wasn't and what
other assets were damaged. We also know
On 26/1/20 12:29 pm, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:> However, there were
"only" 718 listed. Earlier, Warin mentioned 944 > stations in the
database, & I've spotted 3 that I know of that weren't > listed (or
previously mapped).
I was confused by this as well. At the moment there are 734 "fire
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 7:51 PM Andrew Harvey
wrote:
>
> I have thought about if we should map burnt areas, it's tricky because
> while it is surveyable, it changes quickly and the point at when it changes
> to no longer burnt is subjective. For those reasons I do think it's better
> to store
On 12/1/20 12:37 pm, Sebastian S. wrote:
When using OSMAnd for routing I came across the following note: "way has
been simplified using a error criteria of 3m" it is usually in green text.
Does anyone know what this means
It indicates that the number of points in the lines has been reduced by
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 10:40 AM Phil Wyatt wrote:
> RapID roads now available for Australia
>
>
>
But not in the list of downloads:
https://github.com/facebookmicrosites/Open-Mapping-At-Facebook/wiki/Available-Countries
___
Talk-au mailing list
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 8:56 AM Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> We've now got permission & a waiver to use that Data
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Data.sa.gov.au_CCBYPermission_Open_Street_Map.pdf
> so
> that would now also include Location SA, wouldn't it?
>
>
The waiver explicitly
On 8/10/19 7:33 pm, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
Are you sure that ways signed as designated
for cyclists and pedestrians are far more
popular than all other ways?
I think the issue is that he wants to tag paths like this one:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474940890
which looks like this
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 11:56 AM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Any objections, corrections, better words .. ???
>
>
No, looks good.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On 7/10/19 3:55 pm, Warin wrote:
The landuse=forest one is probably an arboretum.
It's a botanical garden laid out in an area of bushland:
https://www.northernbeaches.nsw.gov.au/things-to-do/recreation-area/stony-range-regional-botanic-garden
I separated out the arboreta from the list.
On 7/10/19 2:18 pm, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
As per the title, what do we call a Men's Shed?
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2018-January/011639.html
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
The current tagging for Australian botanical gardens is:
leisure=park 57
leisure=garden 43
leisure=nature_reserve 6
lesiure=playground 1
tourism=attraction 2
tourism=zoo 2
landuse=forest 1
no object tagging 1
It would appear that the parkiness is more interesting than the gardeny
On 6/10/19 8:12 am, David Wales wrote:
Why did he remove the bridge tag?
I think he doesn't understand how to tag man_made=bridge because he took
the bridge tags off the other ways as well:
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=69845883
___
On 4/10/19 10:53 pm, Andy Townsend wrote:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1698#issuecomment-134914770
Thanks for that. I hadn't realised there was yet another prioblem with
using the path tag: highway=path bicycle=designated is currently
rendered differently to
On 4/10/19 10:53 pm, Andy Townsend wrote:
In places like Germany, however, dedicated infrastructure is more
common, and there are usually signs telling you exactly what you are
allowed to do. As I understand it (and this was before my time, so this
is largely hearsay) "cycleway" and
On 4/10/19 5:20 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
though for
something that's unpaved then highway=path and highway=footway mean the
same thing to me.
I think at one point footway was assumed to be paved and path unpaved.
The default now appears to be unpaved for both as they are rendered the
same.
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 4:30 PM Andrew Harvey
wrote:
> I'm mildly for reverting, although I'm happy to hear out arguments either
> way and be proven wrong.
>
Up until May this year path meant an unsealed "track" that was too small
for vehicles (or at least that's how mappers were using them) now
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 4:06 PM Daniel O'Connor
wrote:
> +1.
>
> Do have to amend the bits around not legal for SA cyclists to be on
> footpaths given
> https://www.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/23438/DPTI-Cycling-and-the-Law-Booklet.pdf
>
These days it might be easier to say everywhere
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 4:13 PM Ewen Hill wrote:
> Daniel,
>I thought it was 250watts for e-bikes (a European standard now
> basically global) so the book may be incorrect anyway
>
>
Isn't that what it says on page 3?
___
Talk-au mailing list
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 3:09 PM Herbert.Remi via Talk-au <
talk-au@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> There are almost no paths in the ACT compliant with Australian Tagging
> Guidelines
>
Thanks for bringing that to our attention. Turns out that a "helpful" wiki
user radically changed the suggested way
On 30/9/19 9:20 am, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
One other shared path nearby, they're "painted" on the path
itself, rather than separate signs, & are no longer in very good
condition! :-)
That's why I don't sweat the whole designated/yes thing. All we're
essentially mapping is whether or
On 30/9/19 14:50, Roland Olbricht wrote:
It has been a talking point that the wiki should be purely descriptive.
There is no objection that people sort out tagging questions in the
wiki, but the mixture of purely descriptive and as normative intended
pages would cause confusion.
By
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 7:30 AM Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> Examples of the signs are given on the linked page
>
>
>
Yeap, the law is the same as the ACT. I was more interested in how
consistently they are installed in Queensland. In the ACT as a rule they
don't put them up (but they will use
On 29/9/19 10:41 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access says designated means
"...in general this means that there is a (explicit) sign saying
something like 'pedestrians allowed', or a pedestrian icon."
So if signposted for a particular mode, I'd use
On 28/9/19 8:55 am, Andrew Harvey wrote:
If the way is specifically for a particular mode, then use
mode=designated. So a shared cycle pedestrian path is
foot=designated+bicycle=designated.
Actually in Australia if a path is designated for bicycles then you
can't walk on it:
On 24/9/19 10:56 am, Daniel Graus wrote:
Should all botanical gardens be changed to match one another? Is
leisure=park or leisure=garden more correct in some/the majority/all of
these cases?
OK, a quick global survey
Of the ~2,500 botanical gardens that are in Wikidata and have a match
On 19/9/19 09:41, Herbert.Remi via Talk-au wrote:
Are there any suggestions where matter 4 and 5 could be discussed and links
provided so that the OSM community can communicate, negotiate and formulate a
direction for these things?
I can't suggest anything as I don't understand your
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 7:23 AM Aleksandar Matejevic (E-Search) via Talk-au
wrote:
>
> Near Newcastle there is “END MOTORWAY” sign (
>
On 12/9/19 05:31, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
Since then the pressure from the mountain bike community to has map
everything has reduced, presumably the mountain bike community has
realized that OSM is one of the tools the authorities use to locate
illegal trails.
That's only going to
On 17/8/19 9:29 am, Andrew Harvey wrote:
According to the wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dflagpole you can use
flag:wikidata to specify the exact flag. The Australian Aboriginal Flag
is https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1285625 and the Torres Strait Islander
Flag is
On 18/8/19 11:07 am, Herbert.Remi via Talk-au wrote:
how to do this?
Step 1 read this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
I want to upload the play ground locations to OSM.
It's not just a case of "uploading". A large number of playgrounds in
Canberra have already been
On 13/8/19 09:22, Ian Sergeant wrote:
For OSM it's nothing more than a colouring-in exercise.
Once again it depends on what use you think the data is going to be used
for. If you're interested in selling tennis court maintenance services
then it's useful information. Maybe you're interested
On 13/8/19 08:59, Sebastian S. wrote:
I've also been mapping pools occasionally.
Thinking about it I'm actually not sure what the value for the map could be but
they stand out a lot on good quality aerial images.
Mapping them is probably adding about the same amount of value to the
map as
https://github.com/GIScience/oshdb/blob/master/oshdb-tool/etl/README.md
On Sat., 13 Jul. 2019, 09:30 Milo van der Linden, wrote:
> Thanks! The download server has no oshdb files for Curacao, the Caribbean
> Island I am interested in. Is there a converter available?
>
> Thanks again!
>
> On Fri,
This seems to have been asked a few times before:
https://www.mail-archive.com/talk-au@openstreetmap.org/msg09528.html
https://www.mail-archive.com/talk-au@openstreetmap.org/msg11443.html
https://www.mail-archive.com/tagging@openstreetmap.org/msg41293.html
On 21/3/19 11:26, Thomas Manson wrote:
1) First of all, is my understanding correct? It should be the station name.
Depends on which version you'd like to believe. The original proposal
for public_transport=platform
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?oldid=625726#Platform) said:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 10:46 AM Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> & then when you add parking & bus lanes into the mix, I'm totally
> confused! :-)
>
You're not alone. I tend to say away from lane mapping 'cause I think it's
going to do my head in.
> I understand (I think) that we mark parking
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 8:35 PM Horea Meleg wrote:
> § Fix wrong lane count in Australia & New Zealand:
> https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3258
>
>
Just to let you know, your test for correct lane count doesn't appear to
take into account bicycle lanes. For example:
Hasn't worked for three days now:
https://munin.openstreetmap.org/problems.html#critical
also the Planet dump is also not working. I'm not sure how we're
supposed to report these, there used to be a status page on the wikki
but that appears to no longer be the appropriate place.
On 8/2/19
The old data.gov.au permission is no longer sufficient to use a dataset in
OSM. The first thing you are going to have to do is approach the Council
and get them to sign the wavier.
On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 1:08 PM Daniel O'Connor
wrote:
> I've started
follow
through with the plan, since it seems pretty complete.
If Andrew Davidson is still interested, his script could help match and
add the nodes into the relationships and possibly flag discrepancies in
names.
Is anyone interested in reviving this effort?
On 19/11/18 8:49 pm, Andrew
I've noticed that listed under protect_class=24 (political protection)
for Australia are Indigenous Protected Areas. This is incorrect, as
Indigenous Protected Areas are conservation areas owned or managed by
Indigenous groups and have an IUCN Category assigned to them, they
should be tagged
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 8:36 PM cleary wrote:
>
> I did not see this data in CAPAD 2016
>
Have a look in the "Marine CAPAD 2016 SA summary" spreadsheet.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 8:23 PM Lee Mason wrote:
> But in categories 2-6, it contradicts and lists specific protection titles
> for a protect class.
>
> Sorry, that was me. I added that note to protect_class=1 a number of years
ago but forgot/was too lazy to copy it to the other categories. I've
Planning for the import is not finished yet, so please wait until after
that.
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 21:23 Lee Mason I am prepared to make a start on the Tasmania import over the next few
> days, unless there is some further discussion?
>
>
>
___
Talk-au
If you want to start working on something I have had a go at matching
place nodes:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Dy3
with the corresponding admin_level 10 boundaries:
https://github.com/FrakGart/TestAdmin10Labels
These have been matched by finding the best matching place node by name
within a
On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:05 nwastra, wrote:
>
> *Should all those flagged as non-perennial be tagged as intermittent?
>
Yes.
Seems to be too few perennial but as others have mentioned Australian
> watercourses are predominantly intermittent.
Perennial streams are pretty rare in Australia. If
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 6:29 PM Andrew Harvey
wrote:
>
> So I guess at this point do people want to checkout the simplified OSM
> files for any issues?
>
> They look OK, but I would like to have an opportunity to clean up the JOSM
warnings before we upload them (except the relations with the
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 6:29 PM Andrew Harvey
wrote:
> I'm in favour of first manually removing the
> state borders so we don't dump more nodes on top and then post-upload
> we can just join the new relations to the existing state borders where
> they meet.
>
I can see your point about not
On 07/10/18 23:27, Lee Mason wrote:
Nice work on cleaning up the PSMA data, Andrew. It looks a lot easier to
manage for importing now.
A quick look at the data, and it appears there is some regional/state
variance in the boundaries:
Some of the WA LGAs extend out to the coastal waters
On 07/10/18 18:32, Andrew Harvey wrote:
I see the next steps are to:
- discuss if this is the right format for upload or not,
One question would be should we be putting a place tag on admin
boundaries? According to taginfo only 34% of admin_level=10 has a place
tag.
- how we'll manage
Yeap, maritime boundaries have been on my "todo list" for a while now.
However, I was waiting for GA to release an updated dataset that will
have the new boundaries arising from recent treaty negotiations with
East Timor. I'd suggest waiting till then.
On 01/09/18 10:53, Lee Mason wrote:
On 31/8/18 16:23, Andrew Harvey wrote:
(not sure why the split across 9 and 10...? but it looks like no data for 9
and all suburb/localities are marked as 10, a separate discussion but
perhaps they should be 9 and smaller neighbourhoods be in 10?)
Level 9 appears to have been intended for
http://spatialservices.finance.nsw.gov.au/mapping_and_imagery/lpi_web_services
On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 08:35 Dion Moult, wrote:
> Good morning all,
>
> In OSM in NSW there are administrative boundary lines which are marked as
> suburb boundaries and have names. I assume a long time ago these were
>
On 15/8/18 02:18, Adam Roberts wrote:
Hey folks,
I'm experiencing some routing difficulties for ped/bike near the Wiley Park
station, and looking for some tagging and digitizing advice.
Just out of interest: which router are you using? I haven't been able to
find one that consumes the
There is an alpha version of a Dockerized Taginfo covering just
Australia here:
http://ao-au.taginfo-dev.opengeodata.hu/
Apparently only available till this Sunday.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
On 18/07/18 16:12, Andrew Harvey wrote:
Okay so I guess we still need to use some local judgement?
I thought we were discussing shared zones here? They are clearly sign
posted so I wouldn't have thought that there would be a problem
identifying them.
I'm happy to have them tagged as
On 25/6/18 15:12, Joel H. wrote:
Just letting everyone know that I did a slight revamp to the Guidelines
for Urban Footpaths over on our Tagging Guidelines page
The three things that look a little odd are:
1. Needs an entry for shared paths that don't have a sign (ie: 99%+ of
Canberra shared
On 25/6/18 08:42, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
Just looking at addresses I've loaded without "is_in", & they all seem to
show as Whatever Address, without a Suburb / Town, but with "Enclosing
Features" - State Boundary: Queensland?
See:
On 12/06/18 20:04, Leith Bade wrote:
Our receivers work fine in Australia as I live in Canberra and work for
the Swift Navigation engineering department. Using one of the free CORS
stations here I can get 2cm positions from my car. Mind you the setup
cost ~$2000.
This is the bit I'm a bit
The SA suburbs dataset has post codes in it. However it would appear
that this was not included in the early import:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/zir
On 04/06/18 17:03, Alex Sims wrote:
Hi,
I’m getting increasingly frustrated with how my GPS (OpenStreetMap on
Garmin via mkgmap) and the
Perhaps I should have said 1 in 4 *can* be saved, if you are prepared to
donate your time to do someone else's paid job.
Anyway if you are volunteering to patrol for these and clean then up,
then you are welcome to it.
On 21/05/18 20:52, Andy Mabbett wrote:
On 21 May 2018 at 10:32, Andrew
On 10/05/18 17:18, Andrew Harvey wrote:
These edits are hallmark seo spam, likely all done by the same
organisation, following the same instructions. They all have the same
traits (new username for each edit they make, named after the company,
abuse the changeset comment with spam, never use a
101 - 200 von 314 matches
Mail list logo
