Re: [Talk-at] addr:suburb=* korrekt eingesetzt?

Revert? User eine Auszeit geben Was sagt eigentlich F. Ramm dazu? Hab noch nichts von ihm gelesen. Von: vari...@mailbox.org Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. September 2018 16:28 An: OpenStreetMap AT Betreff: [Talk-at] addr:suburb=* korrekt eingesetzt? Bei dem

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] kosmtik + requête PostGIS exploitant une relation = ERROR

J’ai oublié de mettre la déclaration de la couche dans le projet : { "id": "places_admin_6", "name": "places_admin_6", "class": "", "Datasource": { "type": "postgis", "host": "db.openstreetmap.local", "user": "osm", "password": "osm",

[OSM-talk-fr] kosmtik + requête PostGIS exploitant une relation = ERROR

Bonjour tous, Je cherche à faire apparaître sur une carte en ligne les préfectures et leur nom en breton. La façon d’y arriver est « connue » : il faut faire une jointure entre la table planet_osm_point (qui contient le point et le nom) et la table planet_osm_rels (qui elle contient l’info

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Arceaux partagés motos / vélos

cela dépend vraiment de l'endroit... si c'est un lieu uniquement réservé aux véhicules sncf je vois pas ce qui empêche de mapper les 2 : le service amenity=*sharing (c'est un peu comme une station velib... à cet endroit t'as bcp de chance de trouver un véhicule même si ceux-ci bougent) pour

Re: [Talk-at] addr:suburb=* korrekt eingesetzt?

On 09/26/2018 04:28 PM, vari...@mailbox.org wrote: Bei dem Änderungssatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62646348#map=12/46.7772/15.6701 sind doppelte und dreifache Adressen erstellt worden, teilweise auf bereits bestehende und korrekte. Der einzige Unterschied ist ein

[OSM-talk-fr] e: Arceaux partagés motos / vélos

C'est évidemment plus important car si tu ne loues pas un engin, tu n'as pas de problème pour le garer. Tu peux le louer et l'utiliser sans le garer par contre tu ne peux le garer avant de l'avoir loué. Pour moi c'est juste du bon sens. Principe de la cause et de l'effet si *tu* préfères. Ce

[OSM-talk-fr] e: Arceaux partagés motos / vélos

C'est évidemment plus important car si tu ne loues pas un engin, tu n'as pas de problème pour le garer. Tu peux le louer et l'utiliser sans le garer par contre tu ne peux le garer avant de l'avoir loué. Pour moi c'est juste du bon sens. Principe de la cause et de l'effet si *tu* préfères. Ce

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Arceaux partagés motos / vélos

Je ne suis pas certain de vivre dans le monde, mais à Paris ce qu'on appel "free floating" c'est tu loues un scooter mal garé sur le trottoir pour rouler 3km avec et tu le gares sur un parking 2 roues motorisés (parce que tu es un mec bien). Ce qu'à fait la SNCF c'est de dire, voici un emplacement

Re: [Talk-it] JOSM ed ultimo aggiornamento Java 11

Il 26/09/2018 21:45, Francesco Pelullo ha scritto: Non lo so, io lo uso con IcedTea (Java WebStart rel. 8) su Ubuntu. Appena ho tempo faccio qualche esperimento con una virtual machine in cui gira Windows. Ah già dimenticavo che per linux (debian) icedtea è ancora alla versione 8, quindi il

Re: [Talk-it] JOSM ed ultimo aggiornamento Java 11

Il giorno mer 26 set 2018 alle ore 18:12 liste DOT girarsi AT posteo DOT eu ha scritto: > > > Quindo volendo tirare per la giacchetta neanche la versione 10 di java > va bene? > Non lo so, io lo uso con IcedTea (Java WebStart rel. 8) su Ubuntu. Appena ho tempo faccio qualche esperimento con una

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM Wikibase is now live

Mateusz, I think we have a chance of success this time because unlike other rulesets that are stored in the specific project's GIT repos, this project is * wiki based and centralized, just like the tag documentation, and accessible to a much wider community. In the last week, we had 18 users

[Talk-it] parking lanes

appena visto: un overlay per i parking lanes: https://zlant.github.io/parking-lanes/#15/41.8907/12.5061 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/acsd/diary/45026 Ciao, Martin sent from a phone___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-us] USPS Post Boxes

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018, 09:37 Martijn van Exel wrote: > Leif -- > > I like the idea of making this more consistent. I am not convinced that > 'United States Postal Service' is an improvement over 'USPS'. (Should we > also rename 'UPS' to 'United Parcel Service'? 'FedEx' to 'Federal Express'?) >

[Talk-it] Whodidt Simon04 o Zverik, vi funziona?

Apena provato adesso entrambi ma non creano nessun riquadro storico, zverik mi dice addirittura failed to acquires tile. A voi funziona? -- _|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_ |_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_| Simone Girardelli ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-GB] Access restrictions for lorries above a certain GVM

On 26/09/2018 17:33, Philip Barnes wrote: On Wed, 2018-09-26 at 17:18 +0100, Tony Shield wrote: From the examples given it seems that passing the facing sign is the limiting event, the end of the restriction may be posted with a grey end of restriction sign; surveying them could be a

[OSM-talk-fr] Vincennes

Bonjour, sur Mastodon, quelqu'un signale par une capture d'écran, un soucis sur Vincennes. Je ne connais pas le coin mais j'avoue qu'après avoir regardé, je suis perplexe. Le soucis se situe au carrefour de l'avenue de Paris et de l'avenue Pasteur. Entre les deux voies de l'avenue de Paris, il y

Re: [Talk-GB] Access restrictions for lorries above a certain GVM

On Wed, 2018-09-26 at 17:18 +0100, Tony Shield wrote: > Hi > > What are we going to tag? The length of road/way with the > restriction  > and which lanes, or the placement of the sign as a node and with > some  > directionality. > >  From the examples given it seems that passing the facing sign

[OSM-talk-fr] [OSM-Talk-fr] Import arbres Hauts-de-Seine

Dans le 92 (prononcer neuf-deux) on a aujourd'hui référencé 12 083 arbres cf. https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ChP On a pas mal de données d'arbres en Open Data sous-exploitées https://opendata.hauts-de-seine.fr/explore/dataset/cadastre-vert-les-arbres J'envisage d'en importer une partie dans OSM,

Re: [Talk-GB] Access restrictions for lorries above a certain GVM

Hi What are we going to tag? The length of road/way with the restriction and which lanes, or the placement of the sign as a node and with some directionality. From the examples given it seems that passing the facing sign is the limiting event, the end of the restriction may be posted with a

Re: [Talk-it] JOSM ed ultimo aggiornamento Java 11

Il 25/09/2018 22:17, Francesco Pelullo ha scritto: Ciao lista, su Twitter stanno passando messaggi di allarme per segnalare che l'ultimo aggiornamento di Java 11 crea problemi piu' che altro, soprattutto a chi utilizza JOSM. Suggeriscomo di non effettuare aggiornamenti e rimanere su Java 8/9

Re: [Talk-at] addr:suburb=* korrekt eingesetzt?

Mir ist aufgefallen, dass adresshistory*org das Tag addr:suburb=* zum Bezeichnen von Katastralgemeinden verwendet. Dann würde in addr:city=* immer der Gemeindename stehen. Vielleicht erklärt das die Änderungen. Das kann man natürlich so machen, zumindest für mich war das aber (hinsichtlich

Re: [OSM-ja] 三重県の道路について

三重県の広域農道と思われる道路がhighway=secondaryでタグ付けされている件、 広域農道を県道に指定する旨のリリースや報道は聞いたことがないので間違い （tertiayが正しい）だと思います。 履歴を確認したところ、つい3ヶ月ほど前にsecondaryに変更されたようです。 広域農道やふるさと林道等が誤ってsecondary（やprimary）でタグ付けされている ケースは他にも多いと思います。見つけた都度に修正するよう心がけていますが、 なかなか追いつきません。 石野さんの記述で少し気になる点を訂正させてください。 （重箱の隅をつつくようで恐縮ですが）

Re: [Talk-GB] Access restrictions for lorries above a certain GVM

On 26/09/2018 14:21, Paul Berry wrote: On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 at 13:10, Mark Goodge > wrote: Another issue is how we tag "gateway" weight restrictions. These apply only to traffic in one direction, and not to an entire length of road. They're typically

Re: [Talk-us] USPS Post Boxes

Hi Leif, > On Sep 26, 2018, at 7:16 AM, Leif Rasmussen <354...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Martijn, > I have very little opinion in which value of operator should be used, as long > as they are consistent. I think that basing the 'preferred' values on what > can be found printed on the post boxes,

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM Wikibase is now live

Part of Wikibase that are an attempt to create yet another preset and validator ruleset are probably not going to be used by anybody. Note that so far every editor creates its own (iD, Vespucci, JOSM...). 23. Sep 2018 14:05 by osm...@michreichert.de : > TBH, if

Re: [Talk-GB] Access restrictions for lorries above a certain GVM

On 26 September 2018 15:21:41 BST, David Woolley wrote: >In practice you are not going to get an HGV restriction below 7.5T MAM >as that would rule out appliance delivery vehicles and house movers. That is why most are qualified with except for loading or except for access. I guess

[Talk-at] addr:suburb=* korrekt eingesetzt?

Bei dem Änderungssatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62646348#map=12/46.7772/15.6701 sind doppelte und dreifache Adressen erstellt worden, teilweise auf bereits bestehende und korrekte. Der einzige Unterschied ist ein addr:country=AT, ein wechseln von addr:city=* auf etwas anderes

Re: [Talk-GB] Access restrictions for lorries above a certain GVM

The term "HGV" is not actually legally defined in the UK. Goods vehicles start from 3.5T MAM. There is a special driving licence group D1 which allows you to drive up to 7.5T, but the difference is in the licence, not the vehicle. The sign with an image of a lorry is used for a so-called

Re: [Talk-GB] Access restrictions for lorries above a certain GVM

On 26/09/18 14:49, Tobias Zwick wrote: Thank you for the answers given. Perhaps there are some misunderstandings, so I want to clarify two points: 1. A HGV is defined as a vehicle with a max allowable mass of above 3.5t, even in the UK. Tagging "hgv=no" when seeing this sign is plain incorrect,

Re: [Talk-GB] Access restrictions for lorries above a certain GVM

Thank you for the answers given. Perhaps there are some misunderstandings, so I want to clarify two points: 1. A HGV is defined as a vehicle with a max allowable mass of above 3.5t, even in the UK. Tagging "hgv=no" when seeing this sign is plain incorrect, except if we specifically redefine only

[OSM-ja] 三重県の道路について

お久しぶりです。 本日、neis-one.orgのサイトから国内の変更セットについたコメントを拝見してみたところ、 三重県鈴鹿市あたりで大量に道路が削除されているらしいことが分かりました。 (http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussions?c=Japan#7/33.193/134.302) これは即時リバートするべきでしょうか。それとももっと穏健な手段を取るべきでしょうか。

Re: [Talk-GB] Access restrictions for lorries above a certain GVM

On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 at 13:10, Mark Goodge wrote: > Another issue is how we tag "gateway" weight restrictions. These apply > only to traffic in one direction, and not to an entire length of road. > They're typically used in towns and villages that have been by-passed, > to ensure that HGV through

Re: [Talk-us] USPS Post Boxes

Mark, No, I was not planning on converting post boxes to the 'correct' operator value regularly, but that sounds like a good idea. Martijn, I have very little opinion in which value of operator should be used, as long as they are consistent. I think that basing the 'preferred' values on what can

Re: [Talk-us] USPS Post Boxes

I’d be weary of using what’s on the box as the operator. There are multiple types of drop boxes provided by USPS (also UPS and FedEx have multiple types). These have different restrictions on the type of mail/packages that should go in those boxes. Putting in the wrong box can likely cause a

Re: [Talk-GB] Access restrictions for lorries above a certain GVM

On 26 September 2018 13:13:51 BST, Mark Goodge wrote: > > >On 26/09/2018 13:00, Colin Smale wrote: >> On 2018-09-26 13:48, David Woolley wrote: >> >>> In that specific case (7.5T), which is the most common, it would be >>> hgv=no, as that is the defining maximum authorised mass for an HGV.

Re: [Talk-GB] Access restrictions for lorries above a certain GVM

Hi Tobias How is it done in Europe or The Netherlands - is it different to the answers given? Tony On 26/09/2018 12:35, Tobias Zwick wrote: Hey there I can't believe this didn't come up before - or maybe it did but was not documented in the wiki. In United Kingdom, how do you tag roads

Re: [Talk-lt] Spausdinamas žemėlapis

Aš naudoju Maperitive žemelapio spausdinimui http://maperitive.net/ On 09/26/2018 11:58 AM, Tomas Straupis wrote: Sveiki Gal yra norinčių pabūti instrukcijos testuotojais? Yra rašoma instrukcija, kaip atsispausdinti žemėlapį, sukurtą pagal OpenStreetMap duomenis:

Re: [Talk-GB] Access restrictions for lorries above a certain GVM

On 26/09/2018 13:00, Colin Smale wrote: On 2018-09-26 13:48, David Woolley wrote: In that specific case (7.5T), which is the most common, it would be hgv=no, as that is the defining maximum authorised mass for an HGV.  I'd consider maxweight, for higher limits. Is a bus/coach considered

Re: [Talk-GB] Access restrictions for lorries above a certain GVM

On 26/09/2018 12:35, Tobias Zwick wrote: Hey there I can't believe this didn't come up before - or maybe it did but was not documented in the wiki. In United Kingdom, how do you tag roads signed with this sign? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UK_traffic_sign_622.1A.svg That's a good

Re: [Talk-GB] Access restrictions for lorries above a certain GVM

On 2018-09-26 13:48, David Woolley wrote: > In that specific case (7.5T), which is the most common, it would be hgv=no, > as that is the defining maximum authorised mass for an HGV. I'd consider > maxweight, for higher limits. Is a bus/coach considered to be a goods vehicle for these

Re: [Talk-GB] Access restrictions for lorries above a certain GVM

I can only answer for my self. I generally tag these I usually see with a plain hgv=destination, possibly with maxweight=7.5t. The sign is very rare without an additional plate allowing for deliveries. I do this largely because I want to capture the information rather than because it is the most

Re: [Talk-GB] Access restrictions for lorries above a certain GVM

In that specific case (7.5T), which is the most common, it would be hgv=no, as that is the defining maximum authorised mass for an HGV. I'd consider maxweight, for higher limits. The traditional UK term is Gross Weight, but the, more scientifically correct, term now used, in formal

[Talk-GB] Access restrictions for lorries above a certain GVM

Hey there I can't believe this didn't come up before - or maybe it did but was not documented in the wiki. In United Kingdom, how do you tag roads signed with this sign? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UK_traffic_sign_622.1A.svg Note that the GVM for which the sign applies is given

[OSM-ja] 司法書士/行政書士事務所のタグ

皆様こんにちは。 森と申します。 タイトルの司法書士、行政書士以外にも社会保険労務士とか土地家屋調査士とかいわゆる士業の事務所のタグ付けで悩んでいます。 wikiを見ると office = lawyer lawyer = hogehoge だと思うのですが、hogehogeには何を入れるのが適切でしょう。 法務省の運営している http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/ によればそれぞれの英訳は 司法書士 judicial scrivener 行政書士 certified administrative procedures legal

[talk-au] City of Melbourne Imagery

City of Melbourne just released high resolution aerial imagery taken in May 2018. Right now I'm working to get the imagery into the editors out of the box (https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index/pull/561) but in the meantime in iD and JOSM you can add a custom layer using this

[Talk-cz] Fody - stav a novinky

Ahoj, novinky ve Fody a okoli: - do statistik autoru pridana informace o zakazanych/povolenych fotkach: https://osm.fit.vutbr.cz/fody/?stat.author - vycisteny tagy, ktere nejsou mezi povolenymi ve Fody - drtiva vetsina preklepy apod. - kontaktovani autori s poctem fotek >= 20 kteri nemaji