I would try to secure a face-to-face meeting with your council's GIS team,
and separately with any teams that are custodians of other data you're
interested in. Ask to talk generally about OpenStreetMap and raise this in
the meeting.
I've got a reasonable relationship now with a few people in
PLEASE do not remove the ORPA designations - they are meaningful and
important (in the UK). An ORPA is a way that is not a public right of
way (i.e. public footpath, public bridleway, restricted byway or 'byway
open to all traffic') but nevertheless has legal rights for at least
pedestrian
On 24/03/11 09:10, Mike Harris wrote:
PLEASE do not remove the ORPA designations - they are meaningful and
important (in the UK). An ORPA is a way that is not a public right of
way (i.e. public footpath, public bridleway, restricted byway or 'byway
open to all traffic') but nevertheless has
What has been questioned is whether the information that a particular
path has that designation has come from a legitimate unencumbered source
.that we are able to use or whether it has come from sources which are
subject to copyright and/or database right and which hence should not
have been
Original Message
Subject:Re: Other Routes with Public Access
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:10:19 +
From: Mike Harris m...@delco.idps.co.uk
To: Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu
CC: Mike Harris mik...@googlemail.com, talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
I would assume that
On 24/03/2011 10:11, Mike Harris wrote:
I am not insensitive to the need for OSM to remain free of any
copyright or similar restrictions but I do not think absence of
physical signage /ipso facto/ constitutes such a barrier to use.
I don't either - but think that a source:designation would
On 23 March 2011 19:25, TimSC mapp...@sheerman-chase.org.uk wrote:
Hi all,
Here is part of an email I sent to a few councils regarding rights of way
data (footpaths, bridleways, etc):
I have a big and fairly complicated request regarding the definitive map. I
am interested in making data
Hi
I've had a reply from the user who admits he based the tagging on an
on-line OS map has subsequently removed the specific tag.
The ways still have access tags such as foot, horse etc..
On 24/03/2011 10:11, Mike Harris wrote:
I would
The A11 Fiveways roundabout to Thetford road scheme got a final go-ahead a
few days ago.
http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/Home/Go-ahead-for-long-awaited-road-scheme.htm
This morning I have been seeing if I could model it in OSM completely so
that some clever software could offer to render or route
As I understand it, there is both a written record of where the rights
of way go and the definitive map is in addition, with the written record
taking precedence?
So if a local authority is drawing their map, and it's offset from the
line of a wall for example from OS MasterMap, as the
On 24 March 2011 13:56, Luke Smith luke.sm...@grough.co.uk wrote:
As I understand it, there is both a written record of where the rights of
way go and the definitive map is in addition, with the written record taking
precedence?
So if a local authority is drawing their map, and it's offset
On 24 Mar 2011, at 13:56, Luke Smith wrote:
As I understand it, there is both a written record of where the rights of way
go and the definitive map is in addition, with the written record taking
precedence?
My experience is that it probably depends, and that the statement and map are
very
Dave
I am interested in your opinion but please hold back slightly from
giving me instructions as to what to do or not do. There might be other
opinions.
My use of the verb assume was more to ask for other opinions - and
thank you for yours - than to claim that my personal assumption (or
On 24/03/2011 15:51, Mike Harris wrote:
Good advice, Andy. I need to make more use of that
source:designation key!
Mike
On 19:59, SomeoneElse wrote:
On 24/03/2011 10:11, Mike Harris wrote:
I am not insensitive to the need for OSM to remain free of any
copyright or similar restrictions
On 24/03/2011 17:13, Kevin Peat wrote:
On 24 March 2011 16:56, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com
mailto:e...@waniasset.com wrote:
You could use something like
designation=public_footpath
highway=no
note=Although a right of way, there is no path on the ground.
Would work I
15 matches
Mail list logo
