Re: [Talk-GB] No FHRS data on a food establishment

On 03/10/16 15:50, SK53 wrote: I've just added details for a pub where I stopped for a drink on Saturday. It obviously had about half of it's floor area given over to a dining room. It doesn't appear in the FHRS data. It would still need to register as a food business even if it was only a

[Talk-GB] No FHRS data on a food establishment

I've just added details for a pub where I stopped for a drink on Saturday. It obviously had about half of it's floor area given over to a dining room. It doesn't appear in the FHRS data. Reasons why might be: - The local council only updates the main database relatively infrequently

Re: [Talk-GB] taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk down?

Shaun MacDonald at ITO; not on IRC atm On 3 October 2016 at 14:34, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) < robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is it just me, or is http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/ currently > not working? It's been unresponsive for me for at least the last > couple of days. Does

Re: [Talk-GB] taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk down?

Hi Robert, I'd seen the alert that it was down at the weekend, however wasn't in a position at the time to get to a computer and fix it. I've now rebooted the machine and it's back. Thanks for the reminder to look into it. Shaun > On 3 Oct 2016, at 14:34, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) >

[Talk-GB] taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk down?

Is it just me, or is http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/ currently not working? It's been unresponsive for me for at least the last couple of days. Does anyone know who runs this instance and how to get in touch with them? Robert. -- Robert Whittaker

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly project - taginfo tracker

I'd really strongly disagree here. Getting address data into OSM is important; the shop/amenity stuff is the sugar which coats that pill. In 5 years time (see my figures) many of the fhrs:id will have disappeared from the website. Jerry On 3 October 2016 at 13:13, Dave F

Re: [Talk-GB] Autumn Quarterly Project

For some time I have personally been extending the not:name tag to record these type of errors/mismatches. Usually I do something like not:external_source:tag_name, thus original not:names would become something like not:oslocation:name=XXX. These are a) useful for other mappers (primary use

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Talk-gb-westmidlands Digest, Vol 96, Issue 1

Hi all Is the meeting at The Bull in Price Street? Thanks Andrew > On 3 Oct 2016, at 13:00, talk-gb-westmidlands-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote: > > Send Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list submissions to > talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the

Re: [Talk-GB] Changeover for Quarterly Projects

On 30/09/2016 16:45, Brian Prangle wrote: 3. There are over 19,000 place=farm tags, almost all of them (>18,000) nodes. Mostly they seem to indicate farms but sometimes they get used too enthusiastically for any group of buildings. This is a misuse of this tag. place=farm *is* for a

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly project - taginfo tracker

For me, fhrs:id is obviously needed. ATM I'm only adding 'website' as an additional tag. From that an end user can ascertain info such as an establishments address & the services it provides. Adding full addresses is something I might get around to doing later id there not anything more

Re: [Talk-GB] Autumn Quarterly Project

On 03/10/16 11:17, Jez Nicholson wrote: > I was about to say that the data has a good chance of fairly high > accuracy because it is generated from an active processthen I found > my first typo > :) http://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/en-GB/803334/ "Longhill Hight > School". We can of course

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] October meeting on Wednesday

Fingers crossed I’ll be there Cheers Andy From: Rob Nickerson [mailto:rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com] Sent: 02 October 2016 15:37 To: talk-gb-westmidlands Subject: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] October meeting on Wednesday Hi all, Don't forget that we are meeting on Wednesday back in

Re: [Talk-GB] Autumn Quarterly Project

I was about to say that the data has a good chance of fairly high accuracy because it is generated from an active processthen I found my first typo :) http://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/en-GB/803334/ "Longhill Hight School". We can of course perform a service by reporting typos back. On Mon,

Re: [Talk-GB] Autumn Quarterly Project

On 3 October 2016 at 10:07, Brian Prangle wrote: > Hi John > > The need for two sources of information is a only personal preference of > SK53. You can choose to follow it or not. > > Certainly we'd like to increase postcode and address data and this can be > entered from the

Re: [Talk-GB] UK OSM Community Interest Company (UK local chapter)

A week has gone by and the legal opinion on our AoA has attracted two comments, both from proposed interim directors, so I'm proposing to consolidate these and communicate with the lawyers for an early resolution. I don't think the issue warrants a conference call judging by the level of interest.

Re: [Talk-GB] Upper Booth camp site, Pennine Way near Edale

On 03/10/16 09:23, Nick Whitelegg wrote: > highway=footway or path should really mean "it's just a physical path", > we shouldn't really be assuming things about access. Then add explicit > access tags if we know it's permissive (or designation=public_footpath > if it's known to be a RoW). I'm

Re: [Talk-GB] Autumn Quarterly Project

Hi John The need for two sources of information is a only personal preference of SK53. You can choose to follow it or not. Certainly we'd like to increase postcode and address data and this can be entered from the fhsr data. It's likely to be accurate 95% of the time. Personally I think we can

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly project - taginfo tracker

I think all these measurements are a great idea but in the first instance for the taginfo script I think fhrs:id is sufficient. At least we'll know that is a direct response to our QP. Postcode data I think is a little more tricky than a raw count of objects tagged with addr=postcode. For

Re: [Talk-GB] Upper Booth camp site, Pennine Way near Edale

>So I would say that highway=path was equivalent to highway=path; >foot=yes; bicycle=yes; horse=yes; motor_vehicle=no (spellings may be >wrong). highway=footway would imply yes to just foot. Renderers and >routers will, I think follow this policy. I would also have to say no to this - we need

Re: [Talk-GB] Autumn Quarterly Project

Neil - the gregrs tool is open source https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm so we can raise issues and enhancement requestsbut cannot expect gregrs alone to do all the coding. Other people with python knowledge can assist in making changes. I personally would love to do so. Probably