I was about to say that the data has a good chance of fairly high accuracy because it is generated from an active process....then I found my first typo :) http://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/en-GB/803334/ "Longhill Hight School". We can of course perform a service by reporting typos back.
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 at 10:40 Christian Ledermann < [email protected]> wrote: > On 3 October 2016 at 10:07, Brian Prangle <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi John > > > > The need for two sources of information is a only personal preference of > > SK53. You can choose to follow it or not. > > > > Certainly we'd like to increase postcode and address data and this can be > > entered from the fhsr data. > > > It's likely to be accurate 95% of the time. > > Personally I think we can live with this. > > +1 You will never ever get 100% accurate data, no matter what source. > > > >Hence my suggestion we semi- or > > completely automate it (not currently the most popular of approaches) > > > > As always ground surveys win the argument but we currently lack the > scale of > > mappers on the ground. > > > > Regards > > > > Brian > > > > On 2 October 2016 at 22:38, John Aldridge <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> On 02-Oct-16 17:30, SK53 wrote: > >>> > >>> My personal rules on this have always been two independent sources of > >>> information OR a survey... > >> > >> > >>> FHRS data should contain full address details most of the time, so > there > >>> should be no need to add anything from the website other than the > url... > >> > >> > >> By url do you mean the fhrs:id tag? > >> > >> > >> I'm confused, then, by the assertions on the web page for this project > >> > >>> > >>> > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_2016_Q4_Project:_Food_Hygiene_Ratings > >> > >> > >> that > >> > >> (a) this process might be completely automated [how does that square > with > >> requiring two sources of information], and > >> > >> (b) that one of the goals is to accelerate our completion of UK postcode > >> data [I'd assumed that implied we needed at least to add addr:postcode > too, > >> with or without further checks] > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Cheers, > >> John > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Talk-GB mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Talk-GB mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > > > > > -- > Best Regards, > > Christian Ledermann > > Newark-on-Trent - UK > Mobile : +44 7474997517 > > https://uk.linkedin.com/in/christianledermann > https://github.com/cleder/ > > > <*)))>{ > > If you save the living environment, the biodiversity that we have left, > you will also automatically save the physical environment, too. But If > you only save the physical environment, you will ultimately lose both. > > 1) Don’t drive species to extinction > > 2) Don’t destroy a habitat that species rely on. > > 3) Don’t change the climate in ways that will result in the above. > > }<(((*> > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
