I'd really strongly disagree here. Getting address data into OSM is important; the shop/amenity stuff is the sugar which coats that pill. In 5 years time (see my figures) many of the fhrs:id will have disappeared from the website.
Jerry On 3 October 2016 at 13:13, Dave F <[email protected]> wrote: > For me, fhrs:id is obviously needed. ATM I'm only adding 'website' as an > additional tag. From that an end user can ascertain info such as an > establishments address & the services it provides. Adding full addresses is > something I might get around to doing later id there not anything more > exciting to map. > > If it's decided to do all fhrs:id tag, maybe show details of the databases > subsets such as restaurants,cafes; pubs,bars; supermarkets. etc. > > Dave F. > > On 02/10/2016 15:38, Rob Nickerson wrote: > > Hi all, > > Which tags would you like me to set up a tag-info script for? We can then > track these throughout the quarter. > > *Rob* > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing > [email protected]https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
