Neil - the gregrs tool is open source https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm so we can raise issues and enhancement requests....but cannot expect gregrs alone to do all the coding. Other people with python knowledge can assist in making changes. I personally would love to do so. Probably best to do this in small steps at the beginning as adding extra coders is a culture change.
John - the matching tool above requires fhrs:id and addr:postcode + we agreed to not put transient data from the fhrs dataset into OSM, e.g. the star rating. This can be added to 'Suggested process & tags' as soon as we are happy. On Sun, 2 Oct 2016 at 22:39 John Aldridge <j...@cantab.net> wrote: > On 02-Oct-16 17:30, SK53 wrote: > > My personal rules on this have always been two independent sources of > > information OR a survey... > > > FHRS data should contain full address details most of the time, so there > > should be no need to add anything from the website other than the url... > > By url do you mean the fhrs:id tag? > > > I'm confused, then, by the assertions on the web page for this project > > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_2016_Q4_Project:_Food_Hygiene_Ratings > > that > > (a) this process might be completely automated [how does that square > with requiring two sources of information], and > > (b) that one of the goals is to accelerate our completion of UK postcode > data [I'd assumed that implied we needed at least to add addr:postcode > too, with or without further checks] > > -- > Cheers, > John > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb