What distinction would you make between this and the cycle route over steps
that was discussed recently or the signposted cycle route past cycle barriers
in Barnes, London?
--
Andrew
From: Richard Fairhurst
Sent: 14 December 2020 20:57
To: talk-gb OSM List (E
On 07/12/2020 10:33, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
TBH there's only 170 operator=British Waterways tags according to
taginfo, so it could be polished off pretty quickly with an Overpass
query and a manual edit.
Agreed.
But (correct me if I am wrong) that is still an automated edit.
Keep Right flags web links that have gone offline.
--
Andrew
From: Philip Barnes
Sent: 27 September 2020 18:49
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Hello world and automated change proposal: Add missing
URL scheme on UK's Pubs websites
On Sun
On 20/08/2020 12:28, Andy Townsend wrote:
Perhaps "opening_hours:covid19=open"?
Even that's a bit tricky - if an establishment is registered with the
scheme I guess it doesn't guarantee that it is _currently_ open.
This is (IMHO) part of a bigger problem that opening times are changing
?
* --
* Andrew
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
If there are more than 19 UPRNs for the same building the reference will be
longer than OSM’s tag value limit of 255 characters.
--
Andrew
From: Tony OSM
Sent: 03 July 2020 15:31
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-GB] UPRN & USRN Tagging
As we
A lightning talk could get some attention, including mappers with experience of
datasets elsewhere in the world.
--
Andrew
From: Rob Nickerson
Sent: 26 June 2020 20:49
To: Talk-GB
Subject: [Talk-GB] Land Registry INSPIRE data - 1 July OGL release
Hi all
Also seen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84550786
--
Andrew
From: Chris Fleming
Sent: 03 April 2020 14:06
To: Guthula, Jothirnadh
Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Adding missing roads using Facebook detections
I've spotted some
I wonder if Tfondie who created the Wikipedia page may be the same person.
--
Andrew
From: Andrew Hain
Sent: 23 March 2020 20:18
To: Colin Smale
Cc: Talk-GB
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Anyone in South-West London?
There is now a place name Stadium Village just
There is now a place name Stadium Village just north of Twickenham town centre
that is unfamiliar to me (I live across the Thames). The linked Wikipedia page
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stadium_Village,_Middlesex exists but reads oddly.
--
Andrew
From: Andrew
in Twickenham may be legitimate and
the department store tagging was by another mapper by an editor preset.
--
Andrew
From: Colin Smale
Sent: 20 March 2020 18:46
To: Andrew Hain
Cc: Talk-GB
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Anyone in South-West London?
On 2020-03-20 19:36, Andrew
Also changing the name tag for Eel Pie Island.
--
Andrew
From: Colin Smale
Sent: 20 March 2020 17:11
To: Talk-GB
Subject: [Talk-GB] Anyone in South-West London?
If there is anyone who keeps a weather eye on South-West London, in particular
the Twickenham
Is there a resource I can point anyone who puts C numbers in the ref tag of
roads at?
--
Andrew
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
(map and
compass) a route along those paths.
If I get a GPS trace (e.g. with OSMTracker) while I walk that route, is
it acceptable to use this GPS data to update OSM, or would it be
considered a derivative of OS data?
Kind regards,
Andrew
Soon-to-be contributor (hopefully
On 2019-10-21 11:26, Andy Townsend wrote:
I don't have data for the whole UK, but do have numbers for "OSM
notes" and "fixme tags" for a couple of areas going back at least a
couple of years. If people are interested I could pull the numbers
together.
I'd be interested in seeing these
We can check for properties where the brand:wikidata tag was left behind by
checking the other tags, particularly name= and shop=.
--
Andrew
From: SK53
Sent: 28 September 2019 17:32
To: Silent Spike
Cc: Talk GB
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Subject: Re: Thomas Cook
I am inclined to agree with this though I would distinguish between
non-traversable paths that can be mapped with their connections and
continuously connected traversable ones that should just have their existence
marked on their ways.
--
Andrew
From: SK53
be relaxed if
we did the same.
--
Andrew
associatedStreet-Relationen entfernen? / users: Germany / OpenStreetMap
Forum<https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=65510>
Die Relationen bei mir in der Gegend wurden teilweise seit Jahren nicht mehr
aktualisiert oder überhaupt verändert. Die m
Have you tried using the link at the bottom of the page to switch between
mobile and desktop view before you edit?
--
Andrew
From: n...@posteo.net
Sent: 27 April 2019 15:19
To: Talk GB
Subject: [Talk-GB] Missing Captcha when adding event in OSM wiki
Hi
I
Is this something that could go in Survey Me?
--
Andrew
From: Oisin Herriott (Insight Global Inc) via Talk-GB
Sent: 22 February 2019 20:47
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-GB] Road name contradictions in the UK
Hi Everyone,
Our Open Maps team
182691 | OpenStreetMap<https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/346182691>
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use
under an open license.
www.openstreetmap.org
--
Andrew
From: Jez Nicholson
Sent: 07 March 2019 14:19
To: talk-gb@opens
*> According to Nick's MapthePaths site*
*> (which incidentally also uses newer OS raster data) *
*> there are quite a few missing PRoW in the area too.*
Ho hum - some paths south of Croydon I thought of mapping but they were a
bit too close to the M25 for comfort.
Road signs tagged natural=peak:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5890628170
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5890628171
--
Andrew
[https://www.openstreetmap.org/assets/osm_logo_256-cde84d7490f0863c7a0b0d0a420834ebd467c1214318167d0f9a39f25a44d6bd.png]<https://www.openstreetmap.org/n
I have seen similar but can't recall where or which tile provider. To
state obvious, it only occurs at certain zoom levels.
Once i realised it was probably transient I lost interest.
On Fri, 26 Oct 2018, 01:44 Steve Doerr, wrote:
> A user on the Facebook group 'UK Places Editors' has
.
--
Andrew
From: Robert Skedgell
Sent: 19 September 2018 21:24
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database
On 19/09/2018 16:04, Andrew Black wrote:
> There is a very big difference
>
> - c
There is a very big difference
- ceremonial counties exist now and so are in scope for OSM. As you say
here are differences between them and admin counties when unitary
authorties are involved
- traditional counties are an attempt to recreate the past
So I don't think these trad counties have
Does it measure importance sensibly or is it a category only weakly related to
importance like the authority that maintains roads?
--
Andrew
From: Mark Goodge
Sent: 07 September 2018 14:51
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Wickham Market
Although Dave’s edits left out Northern Ireland,
(https://www.mail-archive.com/talk-gb@openstreetmap.org/msg16162.html) the
question of whether similar edits should take place there was left open.
--
Andrew
From: Brian Prangle
Sent: 29 August 2018 13:20
Imposing strict boundaries on OSM communication channels (in this case a
non-ISO3166 meaning for a talk list) is out of order and is not a proper
response to any disagreement anyone may have about tagging.
--
Andrew
From: webmas...@killyfole.org.uk
Sent: 28
Toby, I really think you need to read through the conversation archived at
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2018-August/thread.html and
answer the points discussed there.
--<https://www.mail-archive.com/talk-gb@openstreetmap.org/>
Andrew
___
>
> On 26 August 2018 16:27:58 CEST, Andrew Black
> wrote:
>>
>> I agree with Dave F " It's still historic data, irrelevant to OSM. They
>> are neither "current or real". That they will "never change" is irrelevant.
>> They add no quality to
I agree with Dave F " It's still historic data, irrelevant to OSM. They are
neither "current or real". That they will "never change" is irrelevant.
They add no quality to the database.They should be removed."
On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 at 12:58, Colin Smale wrote:
> I agree, but where do we
Postal counties (mainly a outer London and Manchester thing in this context)
are essentially defunct.
--
Andrew
From: Martin Wynne
Sent: 10 August 2018 13:00:40
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added
I did manage to get the council to remove a long closed pub from FHRS.
I have cases where both old and businesses are listed. Worried that an
armchair mapper will revert an update to OSM.
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018, 10:24 Gregrs, wrote:
> Hi Colin,
>
> >Oh and another where the fhrs listing has the
Are you offering to create a map with this level of special cases for every
country in the world? I’d love to see the result.
--
Andrew
From: David Woolley
Sent: 04 August 2018 09:55
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] 'C' class roads references
And calling city council officers idiots is not the most helpful of
changeset comment.
On Thu, 26 Jul 2018, 16:39 Martin Wynne, wrote:
> > And, since that also matches what's on the ground,
>
> What's on the ground is that a property in Avenue has a postal address
> in East Street, so maybe
Where I live businesses that are still open sometimes drop out of FHRS. Your
mileage may very.
--
Andrew
From: Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
Sent: 23 July 2018 10:52
To: talk-gb
Subject: [Talk-GB] Updates to 'Survey Me!' tool
A couple of minor updates to my
.@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 13 July 2018 at 19:26, Andrew Black
> wrote:
> > I am pondering a similar but simpler question. I would like to add a
> table
> > listing each authority at https://wiki.openstreetmap.
> org/wiki/Key:prow_ref
> > describing the conventions
I am pondering a similar but simpler question. I would like to add a table
listing each authority at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:prow_ref
describing the conventions used.
With a subpage if there is a lot of info such as Toby's list for Lancashire
I have added the first prow_ref for
I am getting "your editing session has timed out, please log in again."
despite having logged in less than a minute earlier.
Chrome if it is relevant
Thanks
On 7 July 2018 at 19:45, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
>
> 401 would mean you're not logged in.. when you login it stores your OAuth
> token in a
Could we follow the signage for the prow_ref format where the authority puts it
on signs?
--
Andrew
From: Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
Sent: 05 July 2018 09:17:10
To: talk-gb
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] New Data in PRoW Comparison Tool
On 3 July 2018 at 15:10
You might want to ask for Nominatim to return relations for queries of road
names.
--
Andrew
From: Paul Berry
Sent: 25 June 2018 15:59:36
To: David Woolley
Cc: Talk GB
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Local names of bits of trunk roads
Someone's had a brave go
You could also check the way histories to see if the local road names have been
mapped in the past.
--
Andrew
From: Adam Snape
Sent: 25 June 2018 17:11:04
To: Stuart Reynolds
Cc: Talk GB
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Local names of bits of trunk roads
And, to actually
I had a look at the Bing map of Richmond this morning. It now has houses on it,
or rather it has some of them. The resulting map looks, shall I say, familiar
if a bit out of date.
--
Andrew
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https
The property extents might be something that can be turned into landuse
polygons. The existing ones where I live are very low quslity.
--
Andrew
From: Tim Waters
Sent: 14 June 2018 14:09:57
To: OSM - Talk GB
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Has someone just given us
Dear all,
I noticed today that the exit numbers at Bank station are "wrong" (the
map said I needed to take exit H, but this is labelled exit 1 at the
station itself).
Having looked at the changelog for the exit, I see they were changed as
per [1]. Given that the changes were sponsored by TFL I
On Sat, 9 Jun 2018, 01:57 Andrew Black, wrote:
> If you are going to do it use fixmes, much more likely to get noticed than
> notes IMHO.
>
>>
>> Apologies. Might be better stated as "there are advantages both ways".
Round me there are LOADS of unresolved notes. So
If you are going to do it use fixmes, much more likely to get noticed than
notes IMHO.
On Thu, 7 Jun 2018, 21:31 Michael Booth, wrote:
> If you are going to do it use the notes feature, much more likely to get
> noticed than fixmes.
>
> On 07/06/2018 20:53, Andrew Hain wrot
House of Fraser today announced today that half their branches are to close,
listing which ones. Although shops should not yet be removed does it make sense
with this announcement (or others like it in the future) to put notes or fixmes
in the 31 locations involved?
--
Andrew
And some with an apostrophe:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/search?q=Lloyd+TSB#values
--
Andrew
From: Rob Nickerson <rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com>
Sent: 08 May 2018 00:19:36
To: Brian Prangle
Cc: Talk-GB
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Toys R Us
>Lloyds and T
On Sat, 5 May 2018, 12:00 Rob Nickerson, wrote:
> And for the balance: I disagree with Frederik on this one.
>
A crap map could also put people off - "why bother, OSM is so far behind,
> I'll contribute to/just use Google maps instead"
>
> I think i agree with this.
If a dental practice has the name of the dentist in large letters on the fascia
(rather than any other name) does that count as a business name to be mapped or
personal information to be kept private?
--
Andrew
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB
a bit clunky
(Humanitarian doesn’t label anything at all). Before I discuss this with the
map renderers, am I doing the best thing for tagging?
--
Andrew
[https://www.openstreetmap.org/assets/osm_logo_256-cde84d7490f0863c7a0b0d0a420834ebd467c1214318167d0f9a39f25a44d6bd.png]<ht
for a shorter time (which I tagged opening_hours:post_office) with
some (unspecified) services available for the same opening times as the shop.
The POL list [http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postoffice/branch/134810] gives the
longer opening times. Any comments on how it should be mapped?
--
Andrew
What is a suitable way to identify post offices no longer in use such as
http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postoffice/branch/19408 to the maintenance tools?
--
Andrew
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org
Are the changes to names specifically being discussed?
--
Andrew
From: Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch>
Sent: 09 March 2018 07:46
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Petrol stations again
Different area naturally, but at least here the
Best not to use the type key for anything other than relation types (such as
type=multipolygon).
--
Andrew
From: Mark Goodge <m...@good-stuff.co.uk>
Sent: 19 February 2018 15:33:10
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] New Post Offic
My experience has been that although a missing FHRS entry is a useful warning
of what to resurvey, there are too many false positives to remove businesses
without checking on the ground.
--
Andrew
From: Gregrs <gre...@fastmail.co.uk>
Sent: 21 January 2018
Thanks everyone
The pub I was looking at has a FHRS reference under its new name as
"awaiting inspection". This is useful confirmation that its old inspection
is not valid.
On 21 January 2018 at 15:58, Rob Nickerson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't think it has been
If a pub has been taken over by a chain (and changed name), should one
delete FHRS info.
My gut feeling is yes but. ...
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Do we know what a proportion are going to be left. Is it going to be close
to none.
On 3 Jan 2018 17:49, "Brian Prangle" wrote:
> Happy New Year everyone
>
> BT are planning to remove thousands of phoneboxes, many of which we will
> have mapped.I understand that for every
Are there quality assurance tools that flag out of date names like Lloyds TSB?
--
Andrew
From: Paul Berry <pmberry2...@gmail.com>
Sent: 01 December 2017 13:18:33
To: co...@thespillers.org.uk
Cc: Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] NatWest / RBS
On 17 Nov 2017 04:14, "Andrew Black" <andrewdbl...@googlemail.com> wrote:
" I believe we need to be very clear about the licencing. All we have is
Ilya's word (and I don't dispute it but it is hardly verifiable) that Shell
has instructed a third party to map its petro
or the Channel Islands.
--
Andrew
From: Chris Hill <o...@raggedred.net>
Sent: 03 November 2017 19:10:27
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Importing Shell fuel stations
On 03/11/2017 18:45, David Woolley wrote:
> On 03/11/17 17:51, Il
My request. Signed walking routes such as
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6084014
Can i ask about context. Are we talking abou a layer or a website that
could potentially have optional overlays. If the latter could routes be
such an overlay. I appreciate they ate not everyones taste.
>
I am confused by this.
I understood ( x; y; ); to be the union of x and y. Rather than x passing
its results onto y. What am i missing.
On 25 Oct 2017 11:58, "Roland Olbricht" wrote:
While i'm here, can anyone tell me why http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/szG does
> not
Are you saying that anything with a postcode beginning with SW should be tagged
addr:city=London and anything beginning with TW9 or TW10 should be tagged
addr:city=Richmond?
--
Andrew
From: Adam Snape <adam.c.sn...@gmail.com>
Sent: 19 October 2017 09
Anyone up to filling in http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/53.5308/-2.3532
then?
--
Andrew
From: Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk>
Sent: 12 September 2017 22:22:35
To: OSM GB mailing list
Subject: [Talk-GB] "an extraordinary quirk in the
Should we go a bit further and strip out all is_in tags not used by Nominatim
across Britain (which may mean all of them), or are there other uses we should
consider? The community in France did that when they finished mapping communes.
--
Andrew
From: Dave F
What should one do if there are building that have been knocked down and
rebuilt.
Loathe just to delete them because an armchair mapper will come back and
add them back. The new building is not in current bing imagary.
I have added a note #1077006
I am loathe to take photos or roam with a GPS in
a video.
--
Andrew
From: Brian Prangle <bpran...@gmail.com>
Sent: 10 July 2017 12:51
To: Talk GB
Subject: [Talk-GB] Quarterly Project Summer 2017 July-Sept
Hi everyone
This will be to improve bus route relations and station entrances, by popular
vote on OSMUK Loomio channel.
Bus route rel
You can add route relations for each number, that way you can search for the
real prow_ref, not hidden between semicolons.
--
Andrew
From: Bob Hawkins <bobhawk...@waitrose.com>
Sent: 04 July 2017 12:05:25
To: Ed Loach; talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re:
What is the easiest way to locate national grid references on the map? We could
then put notes on the map if there is no-one to check.
--
Andrew
From: Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org>
Sent: 28 May 2017 10:24:19
To: OSM GB mailing list
Subject: [T
Is it actually better to use the website as a unique identifier instead of a
magic number? That way you can check the information online and tools such as
Keepright will alert you if the web page disappears.
--
Andrew
From: Robert Whittaker (OSM lists
> the "fair use" clause.
Which specific legislation are you referring to.
On 12 May 2017 17:10, "Ilya Zverev" wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> First, I was amazed at the response. Thanks for constructive feedback,
> which I answer below, and no thanks for toxic responses, including
Does it include stations belonging to Network Rail?
--
Andrew
From: Stuart Reynolds <stu...@travelinesoutheast.org.uk>
Sent: 08 May 2017 23:44:56
To: Derick Rethans
Cc: Bjoern Hassler; talk-gb-lon...@openstreetmap.org; osm-gb
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] [Talk-gb-
According to http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2762871
edits in Brazil, Russia, the United Arab Emirates and Senegal have also
attracted criticism from locally knowledgeable mappers, looking like someone
who is at best out of their depth.
--
Andrew
OSM is influenced by the maps its contributors see and are used to. In Britain
that includes names of isolated farms on Ordnance Survey maps.
--
Andrew
From: Dave F <davefoxfa...@btinternet.com>
Sent: 17 January 2017 23:00:37
To: talk-gb@openstreetm
as a local and they were added to
the existing polygons, which are somewhat arbitrary (you could micromap with a
polygon for each block omitting all roads). These names appear on OSM-carto in
italics.
What is a general view on when it makes sense to add a name to a landuse
polygon?
--
Andrew
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Wigan 25.07%
371 Basildon 23.95%
372 Clackmannanshire 23.84%
373 Inverclyde 22.45%
374 Doncaster 21.91%
375 Castle Point 19.71%
376 Burnley 17.98%
377 Eastbourne 16.24%
--
Andrew
___
Talk-GB
I am more interested in the possibility that the business has closed.
--
Andrew
From: SK53 <sk53@gmail.com>
Sent: 21 December 2016 13:17:48
To: Andrew Hain
Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Notes for places removed from FHRS?
Techn
?
--
Andrew
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
in the
FHRS data set?
--
Andrew
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Is there a distinction between PSV and "local buses only". I heard a saga
about a heritage bus where driver had PSV Licence in a bus lane. Can't
remember details.
( Reply all this time!)
On 15 Oct 2016 16:26, "Philip Barnes" wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 16:38 +,
Hi all
Is the meeting at The Bull in Price Street?
Thanks
Andrew
> On 3 Oct 2016, at 13:00, talk-gb-westmidlands-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
>
> Send Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list submissions to
> talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org
>
> To subscribe
Every account that has ever been blocked has a link from the profile called
“Active blocks”.
--
Andrew
From: Paul Sladen <o...@paul.sladen.org>
Sent: 17 August 2016 11:04:20
To: Will Phillips
Cc: Talk GB
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] ref:hectares on admin bo
Do we know how these values are calculated, for instance do they come from an
external source?
--
Andrew
From: Colin Smale <colin.sm...@xs4all.nl>
Sent: 15 August 2016 08:39
To: Talk-GB
Subject: [Talk-GB] ref:hectares on admin boundary, and non-resp
Just out of interest, are unincorporated areas in Australia tagged with
boundary relations?
--
Andrew
From: Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>
Sent: 15 August 2016 12:00
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] ref:hectares on admin boundary, a
in
website (see http://iwlearn.net/news)
Or like blogs.openstreetmap.org?
--
Andrew
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
The next London pub meetup will be on Thursday 16th June at 7pm in the Monkey
Puzzle near Paddington station (http://themonkeypuzzlepub.co.UK). Sorry for the
short notice.
--
Andrew
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https
I notice the list of registered pharmacies includes hospital pharmacies.
Not sure these are worth adding as the area should already be marked as a
hospital. And i don't believe the process GP prescriptions.
On 9 May 2016 7:36 p.m., "Rob Nickerson" wrote:
> Nice work
not mapped bus routes for
some time because I haven’t seen enough reward there.
--
Andrew
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
d.
Plus, usefully be part of a worldwide map that people can write worldwide
tools for.
--
Andrew
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
I still get internal errors in a few places, for instance Richmond upon Thames.
--
Andrew
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
I’m getting internal server errors when I try to look at the previews.
--
Andrew
From: Edward Betts <edw...@4angle.com>
Sent: 11 March 2016 15:46
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] OSM with Wikidata: now covers UK and Ireland
I've
Well done and congratulations.
Building or land tags can go on multipolygons, in fact it manages cases more
complicated than this one better. It does seem silly to have just one tag in a
different place though.
--
Andrew
From: Edward Betts <
But surely I can see no obvious harm in the presence of the relations. Also
searching the database by reference doesn’t always work, for instance not all
road segments tagged A1 in the UK are part of the road from London to
Edinburgh.
--
Andrew
From
a UK map is my choice to draw RoW markings
over highway markings. For example a designated right of way on a
private road is marked as a footpath and as a private road.
--
Andrew.
--
Andrew M. Bishop http://www.
My concern is the quality of their location data - they suffer from the
well known myth that a postcode defines the location. I have helped in a
few specific cases but the local branch didn't seem interested in for
example checking the locaion of pubs before uploading.
This then leads to concerns
1 - 100 of 291 matches
Mail list logo