On 23 August 2010 12:59, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 23/08/10 12:46, Jim Avery wrote:
>
>> Forgive me if I'm missing something staring me in the face, but where
>> do I find the new T&Cs and how do I sign up to them should I decide I
>> want to?
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/terms
Many thanks
Please consider the environment. Do you really need to print this email?
>
>
> From: Tom Chance [...@acrewoods.net]
> Sent: 23 August 2010 08:55
> To: Barnett, Phillip
> Cc: David Groom; Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Why I'm not curre
On 23/08/10 12:46, Jim Avery wrote:
Forgive me if I'm missing something staring me in the face, but where
do I find the new T&Cs and how do I sign up to them should I decide I
want to?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/terms
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Forgive me if I'm missing something staring me in the face, but where
do I find the new T&Cs and how do I sign up to them should I decide I
want to?
Cheers,
Jim
(corshamjim, OSC contributor since some time last year)
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@
Richard Fairhurst wrote on 23/08/2010 12:00:
Phillip Barnett wrote:
Potlatch is still offering Opendata as a layer, with no warning as to the
potential problem vis a vis existing contributions. Shouldn't we be
dropping this rather quickly?
I
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
I like the "we" there - much better than the usual "Richard". Really looking
forward to the patch to the API so that users can retrieve their own CT
status
We should really pay more attention to the API change log.
http://git.openstreetmap.org/?p=rails.git;a=commit;h=9
Phillip Barnett wrote:
> Potlatch is still offering Opendata as a layer, with no warning as to the
> potential problem vis a vis existing contributions. Shouldn't we be
> dropping this rather quickly?
I like the "we" there - much better than the usual "Richard". Really looking
forward to the pa
email?
From: Tom Chance [...@acrewoods.net]
Sent: 23 August 2010 08:55
To: Barnett, Phillip
Cc: David Groom; Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Why I'm not currently using OS Opendat as a source WAS
The last 2%
On 22 August 2010 20:52, Barnet
Tom Chance writes:
>I have been contributing stacks of data using the OS StreetView data on the
>assumption that - having been discussed, put on the wiki and into Potlatch, it
>was OK. Now I hear from Etienne that I might have to drop out of OpenStreetMap
>because my user account may not be compa
On 22 August 2010 20:52, Barnett, Phillip wrote:
> Potlatch is still offering Opendata as a layer, with no warning as to the
> potential problem vis a vis existing contributions. Shouldn't we be dropping
> this rather quickly?
>
>
Quite!
Also, why is it on the wiki without a massive red font war
Andrew writes:
>In the unlikely event that issues with Opendata are unresolvable the database
>people will have to remove all Opendata-based mapping anyway, leaving my
>contributions clean.
This is in the even more unlikely event that the benefit to the project from
moving to ODbL (which is, um,
David Groom writes:
> Oh , if only it were that simple.
>
> Partly as I said in my earlier email, the CT's talk about data you have
> added, not data which still exists.
>
> But more importantly your contributions would still remain in all the planet
> dumps, so I presume you'd be relying on
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew"
To:
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 9:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB]Why I'm not currently using OS Opendat as a source WAS
The last 2%
David Groom writes:
Oh , if only it were that simple.
Partly as I said in my earlier email
Andrew wrote:
> There is essentially no difference post-relicensing between data derived from
> an
> unrelicensable source and mapping that is not relicensed because people cannot
> be contacted. Planet dumps from the CC-by-SA era are a non-issue because they
> remain wholly under the Creative Co
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew"
To:
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 8:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB]Why I'm not currently using OS Opendat as a source WAS
The last 2%
David Groom writes:
Arguably it is too late, if you take a strict interpretation of the C
David Groom writes:
> Arguably it is too late, if you take a strict interpretation of the CT's and
> their preamble.
I see no real problem.
All of my Opendata-based edits have clear source tags; apart from quality
control issues, I have always understood this is needed for the licence even
wit
-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of David Groom
Sent: 22 August 2010 20:30
To: Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Why I'm not currently using OS Opendat as a source WAS
The last 2%
- Original Message -
From: "Barnett, Phillip"
To: "'80n'
- Original Message -
From: "80n" <80n...@gmail.com>
To: "Barnett, Phillip"
Cc: "David Groom" ;
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 8:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Why I'm not currently using OS Opendat as a source
WAS The last 2%
Phillip
OSM has
- Original Message -
From: "Barnett, Phillip"
To: "'80n'" <80n...@gmail.com>; "David Groom"
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 8:06 PM
Subject: RE: [Talk-GB] Why I'm not currently using OS Opendat as a source
WAS The last 2%
18:41
> *To:* David Groom
> *Cc:* Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Talk-GB] Why I'm not currently using OS Opendat as a
> source WAS The last 2%
>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 3:23 PM, David Groom
> wrote:
>
>
>
> ----- Original Me
[mailto:talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of 80n
Sent: 22 August 2010 18:41
To: David Groom
Cc: Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Why I'm not currently using OS Opendat as a source WAS
The last 2%
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 3:23 PM, David Groom
mailto:revi...@pacific-r
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 3:23 PM, David Groom wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message - From: "Kevin Peat"
> To: "Robert Whittaker (OSM)"
> >;
>
> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 2:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Why I'm not currently using OS Op
>>> However, that doesn't change the fact that the OS OpenData license is
>>> incompatible with the contributor terms, and DbCL, and quite possibly
>>> ODbL too.
>>>
>> I thought this was still to be confirmed? It may not be that important to
>> townies but there is a lot of value in the OS data f
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Peat"
To: "Robert Whittaker (OSM)" ;
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Why I'm not currently using OS Opendat as a source
WAS The last 2%
However, that doesn't change the fact t
> However, that doesn't change the fact that the OS OpenData license is
> incompatible with the contributor terms, and DbCL, and quite possibly
> ODbL too.
>
>
I thought this was still to be confirmed? It may not be that important to
townies but there is a lot of value in the OS data for rural map
>> OS opendata is released under a CC-BY-SA licence
>>
> Please go and actually read the OS OpenData licence. It is not CC-BY-SA.
> Please stop spreading this FUD.
You're right, it's not CC-By-SA. The actual license is a custom
"attribution-style" license, that's closest equivalent in CC terms
wou
David Groom wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Shane Reynolds"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] The last 2%
Hi,
I am the developer who works on a number of products including OSM
Analysis
for ITO.
I am slightly confused about making the OS Locator
- Original Message -
From: "Shane Reynolds"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] The last 2%
Hi,
I am the developer who works on a number of products including OSM
Analysis
for ITO.
I am slightly confused about making the OS Locator box a dashed box i
28 matches
Mail list logo
