You can check house prices online, have any in that area changed hands
for a disproportionately high price? http://www.nethouseprices.com/
Is the railway line still open to passengers, I can see that the
stations have closed, but a ride in a train along there may be of
interest.
Phil
On Tue,
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 23:36 +0100, Big Fat Frog wrote:
This is very puzzling.
On a separate but connected note, if the Google imagery had shown a
clear entrance/drive/path or whatever, I presume that would have to be
left out of the DB due to copyright? Also, does our allowed use of Bing
On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 11:03 +, Andy Mabbett wrote:
We seem to have a number of tags, in Birmingham, with a value of
operator = bcc. Would it be possible, and sensible, to have these
changed to operator = Birmingham City Council?
I would think that is sensible, we should avoid such
On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 17:25 +, Rob Nickerson wrote:
Thanks for letting us know.
Based on the progress of the Coventry public realm improvements and
this cross-reference photo [1], I would date the imagery as circa 27th
March 2012.
I am in North Shropshire, it certainly looks like this
Hi Brian
I have not managed to get to the pub I mentioned in Wellington, but
after some thought the area I believe really needs a mapping blitz is
Oakengates, http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/52.69476/-2.45138
This is a town centre that has received very little attention. A quick
glance in
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 14:35 +, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
We change to the new licence in just under a month's time, so it's a
good time to look at the current state of the UK. What's likely not to
be carried through to the new database?
The good news is that the UK is in a very healthy
I have just been having a play with open.mapquest. It looks really good,
and would love to see it used more.
I did come up with one strange, but hopefully easyly fixed, problem. I
have put in a route from Markfield, Leicestershire to Wem, Shropshire.
Initially it all looks good, it uses the M6
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 13:22 +, Andrew wrote:
Andy Allan gravitystorm@... writes:
I'll bet it's to do with the US.
I think that in the US we are mapping freeways as either
highway=motorway (for freeways that cross state lines, i.e.
Interstates) or highway=trunk (for freeways
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 15:38 +0100, Rob Nickerson wrote:
Good question. I had a quick look on google and found the following
website:
http://www.nidirect.gov.uk/speed-limits-how-they-are-set
One particular quote is of interest:
Although national speed limits can be set for Northern
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 12:25 +0100, Andy Street wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 02:12 +0100, SomeoneElse wrote:
I've been in contact with the mapper concerned about these problems
several times over the past month, trying to be friendly and helpful,
as
would only be fair to a new mapper.
Really not, and doesn't have the comedy ring of being his parents basement.
Can't find it, I guess its somewhere in Buxton?
Phil
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 10/05/2012 8:23 Brian Prangle wrote:
If you look at zoom level 3 for the UK you will see the Kingdom of Ivania
rendered. A google search
On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 10:00 +0100, Robert Norris wrote:
I've added my 2 penneth.
Maybe we should gather more samples of signs - e.g. to show differing
Councils styles (and then hopefully agreed tagging) to give better guidelines.
I've have a look my photos but I think I tend to delete
On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 18:22 +0100, Ed Loach wrote:
Further to my earlier answer, Essex arrows tend to have the CC crest
on the arrow itself, and public footpath (or whatever) around the
top of the circle (if the arrow is pointing straight up). So I might
change my answer if there is *just* a
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 13:42 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Appetite, yes, but you can also easily chase people away if your system
detects too many things where people don't think it's a bug at all, so
some tuning might be necessary. One of the weaknesses of most of the
existing systems (with
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 20:49 +0200, Colin Smale wrote:
Tagging it as maxwidth=6'6 and ignoring the qualification is IMHO a
good starting point on the grounds that routers tend to ignore all sorts
of restrictions in the initial and final bits of the route anyway.
I hope they never ignore this
The built up area of Chester straddles the England-Wales border and the
football ground is right on the border. The pitch being in Wales and some of
the car park and offices in England.
Phil
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 13/06/2012 13:13 Colin Smale wrote:
Not directly OSM-related but I
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 14:33 +0100, Gregory wrote:
On 19 June 2012 14:13, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Gregory wrote:
On 19 June 2012 14:07, Richard Fairhurst
rich...@systemed.net wrote:
I use admin:ref for refs that are
I had spotted some of these, same mapper, near Whitchurch, and must
admit it has concerned me as previously it had shown on the map as a
tracked.
It is still visible on the ground, but now not visible on the map. This
seems wrong to me, my feeling it should be reverted. Was going to
contract the
Don't know if I did it right, but I mapped Wem millennium garden using leisure
=park, designation =Wem millennium garden.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/147994711.
Phil
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 04/07/2012 12:42 Rob Nickerson wrote:
Hi All,
I am looking for suggestions on how
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 17:46 +0100, J.Woollacott wrote:
The challenge is to remember to remove the restriction at the end of the
event.
Always add a note as well explaining what's in place so somebody else
understands and doesn't 'fix it'
Jason W (UniEagle)
Would it not be better to
I am trying to fix a routing problem, that I found whilst investigating
an error was reported in mapdust.
It is a strange one and has me totally baffled, so hoping someone here
can help.
A simple U-Turn around a roundabout, adds a detour along Llangollen
Road, to then use Tower Hill to turn
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 20:37 +0100, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
+1 for blocking
Have contacted islandtoerag about silly edits in Southampton, no
response.
Time to block this destructive yob.
Nick
+1 to blocking
He currently appears to be destroying the Long Island Expressway in New
York.
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 23:16 +0100, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 20:37 +0100, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
+1 for blocking
Have contacted islandtoerag about silly edits in Southampton, no
response.
Time to block this destructive yob.
Nick
+1 to blocking
He currently
On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 10:00 +0100, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
I am wondering who it is and why. THOU SHALT NOT REVERT confirms
he/she/it knows what they are doing.
Agreed. This one is called THE GENERAL SHALL NOT REVERT THEE
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12777187
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 12:33 +0100, Brian Prangle wrote:
Hi Andy
Impressive! Shame about the data. Just done a quick look around
Acocks Green - ATMs missing and some are up to 30m away from their
actual location. I would estimate about 95% accuracy. Anyone else had
a look?
Too small an
Which forum thread?
Phil
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 21/08/2012 14:32 Tom Chance wrote:
On 21 August 2012 13:29, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
Also, mass-retagging I frown upon. Why was this even done?!
Agreed. Frederick has already applied a block.
Out of interest, which part of
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 20:37 +0100, Borbus wrote:
On 21/08/12 19:11, Adam Hoyle wrote:
Speaking of the which, anyone have any idea when the designation
tag will be rendered on the main OSM renderer (or even in Potlatch which
would do me in the short term).
The mapnik layer on osm.org is
I have seen Byway signs in Wiltshire in the past few months.
Phil
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 22/08/2012 14:21 SomeoneElse wrote:
Dave F. wrote:
is there an out of copyright source for the two different types of
byway: restricted_byway byway_open_to_all_traffic?
I'd imagine that the
On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 11:15 +0100, Craig Wallace wrote:
On 07/09/2012 21:03, Philip Barnes wrote:
A while ago I had a burst of ferry and Channel Tunnel routing, I had
successfully got routing through the Channel Tunnel working, although
some tracing needed to be done with the French
I can think of quite a few border roads that will need signposts before that
happens.
Phil
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 25/09/2012 1:38 SomeoneElse wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
Correct. I did however use alternative maxspeed:type at times which
also appears in the DB and which I feel is
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 14:00 +0100, Jason Cunningham wrote:
A few of my own thoughts. Since the subject came up on the GB list a
year ago I've been adding speed limits. Personal confusion about a
speed limit on a roundabout along a dual carriageway led to me
creating a personal page about UK
I would not consider a roundabout or a slip road to be any different to that
signposted.
Whilst exceeding 60 on a roundabout is unlikely, I would consider the limit to
be that of the road it is joining.
In the days before the chopsticks signs on motorways, and still in Scotland,
the 70 sign
I was thinking of asking on sabre.
Am especially puzzled by the slip road situation. Tomtom does drop the limit to
60 on slip roads, which I had always assumed is an error.
One place I have noticed it recently is going from the A41 to the A55 westbound
near Chester. At some point, before the
I have recently found a fairly common problem with stiles and pedestrian
gates where footpaths join roads.
Often a stile, or gate tagged for access on foot only, is used at the
junction with a road. Routers then assume the road is for foot only and
route around.
I am not finding any users are
On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 19:07 +0100, Lester Caine wrote:
Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
Instead, the two paths on the same side should meet
at a separate node a small distance from the style, with a short
linking segment between that node and the stile.
With a short segment joining the
Hi Andy
The A460 is very definitely not a motorway. The change is wrong and
needs to be reverted. As a new Shropshire resident, I regularly travel
this way, as our familes are still in Leicestershire. I can correct this
from knowledge easily and can run a new GPS trace when I go that way at
the
I am baffled by this one
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/13567143, amongst many others.
Anyone able to ask why in a politely worded German email?
Phil
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 21/10/2012 16:33 SomeoneElse wrote:
On 21/10/2012 16:08, Robert Norris wrote:
If you are in other parts of the UK between those days you may find other
areas with social meetings too.
Phil
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 31/10/2012 15:04 Tom Hughes wrote:
On 31/10/12 14:45, Kathleen Danielson wrote:
Sorry to burst into the conversation here, but I organize the Geo
Am not sure why they are tertiary_link, they are just a short section of
one-way around a roundabout splitter island. In this case I think they
should be changed to tertiary.
I must admit I have never understood the highway=..._link.
Phil
On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 21:03 +, Ian Caldwell wrote:
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 06:22 -0800, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Someoneelse wrote:
o Instead of the mixture of highway=cycleway, highway=path
and highway=track that exists currently, replace with
highway=track throughout (it's all wide enough for the trail
maintenance folks' Land Rovers)
Hi
I have been playing with OSM based routing on my phone, as well as with
OSRM.
One strange thing I have been coming across is the display of addresses
seems to over use district council names and regions.
A few examples,
In this one, the start, finish and all via points are displayed as
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 06:52 +, Dudley Ibbett wrote:
Personally, it is good to see others adding field boundaries.
I thought it might be useful to describe my current practice with
regard to mapping field boundaries. In making the following comments,
I would say that I am interested in
I also spotted a similar earlier problematic edit by the same user,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/14534753 which I have also
reverted.
Although got the number wrong in my comment, sorry.
I think the first suggestion will be not to change so much in one go.
Phil (trigpoint)
I'd love £1 for everyone one of our visitors has arrived via the local sorting
office.
Postcodes are good for delivering post, not for navigation/insurance etc.
Phil
--
Sent from my Nokia
On 09/01/2013 14:51 Tom Hughes wrote:
On 09/01/13 14:36, Aidan McGinley wrote:
I've been looking
The sorting office is often 1AA.
What would be useful is to find out where these postcodes are delivered to,
because thats where you want to go when you type it into your Satnav.
Phil
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 09/01/2013 15:01 Tom Hughes wrote:
On 09/01/13 14:57, Aidan McGinley wrote:
If we were to use this method then we would need to tag a lot of road names,
as in my experience these are the names satnavs use. It is rare for them to
actually pronounce a place name but road names are often named after the place
they go to.
Phil (trigpoint)
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On
/01/2013 15:00 Andy Mabbett wrote:
On 10 January 2013 14:29, Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
If we were to use this method then we would need to tag a lot of road
names, as in my experience these are the names satnavs use. It is rare for
them to actually pronounce a place name but road
Shrewsbury is pronounced Shrew, a in the tiny animal, by locals.
Have just asked someone born there, his comment was its only pronounced
Shrowsbury by posh people who aren't from there, and those who go to shrowsbury
school.
Phil
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 10/01/2013 16:18 Robert Scott
I am a bit concerned that the variable speed limits with active traffic
management sections are missing the normal speed limit of 70 mph, they
are tagged as maxspeed=signals.
This page was
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:maxspeed#Special_cases and
in particular the words and plain
On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 11:38 +, Andy Robinson wrote:
Below might be of interest to some. I'm assuming the venue is Shrewsbury but
you should check.
Cheers
Andy
ICE Shropshire Group
Airfields and German maps of Shropshire from the 1940's
Tuesday 14th May 2013, 18:00:00
Speaker
There are no such signs on the road, it is just the A50. I travel along it
every fortnight.
I would agree that we change the tags to something else, such as official_name
or similar. I am happy to volunteer.
In the satnav senario long names such as this just confuse when the user does
not see
On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 15:01 +0100, Colin Smale wrote:
Aha, it's Mauls is it... He is indeed very prolific, and adds a lot of
missing details across the whole planet. However he never seems to
disclose his sources, either in the source tag or in changeset
comments.
I have spotted that Mauls
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 11:19 +, SomeoneElse wrote:
SomeoneElse wrote:
I'm planning to remove names that I can't find evidence for
I think that it's clear from the replies to this that the general
concensus is in favour of not having these as names. I'll get on with
updating the
On Fri, 2013-03-08 at 18:03 +, Jason Cunningham wrote:
There is a abandoned nuclear bunker under of the buildings that might
interesting to add to OSM (thats if there is tag for such things)
building: yes
name: Hack Green Nuclear Bunker
source: Bing
tourism: attraction
On Sat, 2013-03-09 at 14:30 +, Derick Rethans wrote:
What's wrong with names in different languages?
Nothing as long as it is from a verifiable source and names should
really not break the rule of 'map what we see'. Nowhere will you see
Фаррингдон, what is its source?
In terms of making a
On Sat, 2013-03-09 at 15:42 +, James Churchman wrote:
looks great .. tho still not quite sure of the difference between a
halt and a stop a stop_position etc.. mostly seem to be used
interchangeably and in reality interchangeably with a platform etc..
I doubt there are any halts on the
Shrewsbury has a no entry except vehicles over 13' 3 high ( and cycles
). There is no one way of any sort at the other end, so I assume
providing you don't pass the no entry sign you can turn back at any
point.
It also has a street with no vehicles except for access (red circle, so
includes
On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 18:28 +0100, Colin Smale wrote:
I had already suggested boundary=planning to SemanticTourist.
Boundary=civil is rather ambiguous. In my eyes the boundary tag serves
to differentiate which hierarchy the area belongs to. For example
boundary=police might serve for police
Hi Andy
Seems a good idea. I would suggest a new tag, such as bridge_ref.
I have come across cases of canal bridge numbers using the ref tag, which
causes navigation instructions to be
continue onto A41
continue onto 107
continue onto A41
that one was near Tarporley.
Most canal bridge numbers
On Sun, 2013-04-28 at 10:08 +0100, Malcolm Herring wrote:
On 28/04/2013 09:49, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
don't know Leeds well enough to know what might be thought of as the centre.
Leeds Town Hall would the most suitable.
Both already exist, Leeds is here
As so few houses are mapped, could it be that mappers have so far avoided the
more difficult areas?
Phil (trigpoint)
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 29/04/2013 15:07 Tim Waters wrote:
Thought this may be of interest to folks.
The chart illustrates the alignment of buildings in the OSM
Hedges are also rendered at higher zoom levels.
Mapping hedges alongside roads had inspired me to try mapping roads as areas,
not too sure if its been a success.
Phil (trigpoint)
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 30/04/2013 12:09 Henry Gomersall wrote:
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 11:15 +0100, Ed Loach
+1 from me too.
Phil (trigpoint)
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On Sat, 2013-09-07 at 13:43 +0100, OpenStreetmap HADW wrote:
On 7 September 2013 12:15, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
In that instance isn't there effectively a short footway that runs parallel
to the short piece of road that has the barrier on it?
Micro-mapping tends
On Sat, 2013-09-21 at 22:09 +0100, Andy Street wrote:
I'd agree that maxspeed=national is insufficient as it is impossible
to tell what speed you can do in a built up area.
National speed limits rarely apply in built up areas, other than
sometimes on faster feeder roads. The built up area limit
a feature of the speed limit.
eg 2
On 23 September 2013 09:34, Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
National speed limits rarely apply in built up areas, other than
sometimes on faster feeder roads. The built up area limit in the UK is
30mph, unless signposted differently. This is implied
I tend to see an NPE tag as something that needs attention. A lot of the
area, where I now live, North Shropshire, was armchair mapped using NPE
maps. That includes a lot of roads, I am getting through resurveying
them but even today I found one that according to my GPS was 50m from
where it
On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 17:25 +0100, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
... and to confuse things further, only a minority of areas have
unitary authorities (typically but not exclusively mid-sized cities),
the rest of the country still has the county/district system. An
illogical mess I know!
One of
I came across an odd situation where a road is on way, except for cycles
and vehicles over 13'3 high. Its a residential area of Shrewsbury which
would be a useful rat run, hence the oneway. But to make it complicated,
there is are industrial units, and a low bridge.
Not sure of a better way, but
On Sun, 2013-10-13 at 13:21 +0100, SK53 wrote:
This morning I came across a name tag on a power line. I believe this
is now quite a common practice ( 8% of lines in an 3-month old
data-set). Personally I deplore it:
* I have never found a convenient sign on a power line giving
Also the area we are lacking at the moment is rights of way, these are often
not visible on satellite imagery and the only way to map them is to go out and
walk them with a GPS.
Phil (trigpoint)
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 18/11/2013 13:03 SomeoneElse wrote:
Jonathan wrote:
... but are
percentage of my mapping
time is spent online. If I do ground survey it's when I'm somewhere for work.
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 18/11/2013 13:15, Philip Barnes wrote:
Also the area we are lacking at the moment is rights of way, these are often
not visible on satellite imagery
Not sure if its been changed recently, but using IE on my corporate desktop,
there is a close button.
Phil (trigpoint)
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 02/12/2013 13:04 Brian Prangle wrote:
Hi Tom
What would I have done differently? I wouldn't be composing emails complaining!
;-). The close
I have come across, and corrected a number of mis-tagged UK towns and cities,
which had clearly been mis-tagged to suit the renderer.
City status is an honour granted by The Queen, not something that can be
claimed by size or population. Like trunk roads, its quirky and like trunk
roads I see
10:13 Andy Allan wrote:
On 25 February 2014 09:47, Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
City status is an honour granted by The Queen, not something that can be
claimed by size or population. Like trunk roads, its quirky and like trunk
roads I see it as the way we do things here
That is absolutely my point, we should tag the facts and leave it to different
renderers to then use those facts in the way that best suits their users.
We should not deliberately mis-tag to make Milton Keynes bigger than St Albans
on mapnick, mapnick is just one of many renderers, a fact often
The number of edits suggests to me that they are not inexperienced.
Is it possible to get some sort of block until they start responding to emails?
Phil (trigpoint)
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 19/03/2014 10:21 SomeoneElse wrote:
On 18/03/2014 07:13, Filip Chirita Rares Cristian wrote:
On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 19:37 +, Brian Prangle wrote:
Hi everyone
As if coming to Birmingham for an OSM event wasn't enough to tempt you
here; we have the Flat Pack Film Festivval on at the moment: details
of Saturday's calendar of events here
Hi Brian
It sounds a good idea, it would be useful to be able to filter notes by age too.
When notes are added, a message does appear in the gb irc channel, where they
can be looked at by somebody, but the fading sounds a nice idea.
Phil (trigpoint)
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 26/03/2014
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 09:46 +0200, Marc Gemis wrote:
Left and right is decided by the direction of the osm-way. Not by
east/west/north/south.
BTW, in Brussels we have streets with 4 official names : left/right,
French/Dutch :-)
Rather than left/right should we not be using
I am not convinced proposed highways are especially useful in OSM, until
construction starts they are just ideas and break the map what we see
rule.
Proposed highways should certainly not render, for example I drove
through Uttoxeter with osmand running and the proposed highways make the
map
On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 16:51 +0100, John Sturdy wrote:
I hadn't known (or remembered) that recommendation from the wiki; but
still, the Ukrainian spelling (resulting in a Ukrainian reader
understanding it as a reasonable phonetic imitation of the English
name) may often be very far from a
On Thu, 2014-08-07 at 11:39 +0100, Matt Williams wrote:
On 6 August 2014 19:52, Brian Prangle bpran...@gmail.com wrote:
Ive been out and about and doing some web research on secure parcel
delivery/collection lockers. The Packstation system in Germany only applies
to Germany and is a
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 06:55 +0200, Marc Gemis wrote:
Can I apply this reasoning to English names for Belgian towns as
well ?
Where can I verify that the English name for Antwerpen is
Antwerp ? What is the source of this data? Under which license was
that made available ?
How can someone
We have discussed this subject a couple of times and have, I think,
concluded that displaying the ref (generally only known to local
government people) on roads that are unsigned is not helpful to the end
user.
Some, but I suspect not all, of the thread starts are below.
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 07:37 +0100, Lester Caine wrote:
On 13/08/14 01:22, Robert Norris wrote:
However I am in favour of this edit, but I think the edit needs to *only*
change 'C' Roads, as some B roads are tagged tertiary.
Ditto.
But it's a bit like the 'name' problem where a few roads
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 09:51 +0100, Matt Williams wrote:
On 13 August 2014 01:22, Robert Norris rw_nor...@hotmail.com wrote:
AFAIK there are some (but very few) roads where the C number is sign posted
but not that I'm aware of any explicitly.
Whether any of these have ever been captured
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 01:22 +0100, Robert Norris wrote:
Ignoring the source information for now, but I suspect it is very
similar to rights of way information in that it is probably derived from
OS maps.
The following overpass query highlights the issue, Norfolk standing out
as
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 12:01 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, Lester Caine wrote:
On 13/08/14 10:02, Derick Rethans wrote:
It's not only C roads. When looking at Nairn (because of a reported
storm damage to a road) I noticed lots of U-references. Have a look at:
I have carried out a first changeset, can anyone spot anything wrong
before I continue?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24727341#map=8/52.507/-3.796
Thanks
Phil (trigpoint)
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 09:17 +0100, Antje (OpenStreetMap) wrote:
I live in London, so I could figure out a small part of the boundary based on
the fact that it doesn’t go outside London for obvious reasons, and on the
basis of a number of past surveys and personal memory (which I call
On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 12:26 +0100, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
On 23 October 2014 12:19, SK53 sk53@gmail.com wrote:
The geojson can be converted into a shp file and read into PL2 or JOSM. Most
useful is to use this to generate a task list in JOSM and step through them
(I've done this to
On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 12:57 +0100, Dave F. wrote:
On 23/10/2014 12:06, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
On 23 Oct 2014 11:53, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Would it be worth adding a fixme tag to the unnamed shops that
explains '= betting' is discouraged to add a proprietor's name
On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 23:35 +, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
On 2 November 2014 16:11, Andy Street a...@street.me.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2 Nov 2014 13:24:46 +
Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl wrote:
- 'Brantano Footwear' versus Brantano
Whilst company names do not necessarily
On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 17:29 +, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
On 4 November 2014 12:55, Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
ALDI, LIDL, ASDA and SPAR are all abbreviations of their full names, in
the same way as NATO, AIDS, BBC, OSM or GNU are.
Whether Spar is an abbreviation
On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 08:32 +, Stuart Reynolds wrote:
I have to say that this is all getting rather intense. We are talking
about one chain of shops! And clearly we aren't going to get an
agreement on standardisation.
We aren't, and to be honest the data consumer can post process whether
--- Original message ---
On Thu Nov 20 2014 11:39:36 GMT+ (GMT), Ben Pollinger wrote:
Hello all,
The Great British Public Toilet Map [was launched yesterday] providing
details of over 8,000 public toilets in the UK including council
facilities, train stations, community toilet
On Thu Nov 20 2014 15:22:52 GMT+ (GMT), Harry Harrold wrote:
Hi Phil,
Thanks for taking the trouble to have a look round!
http://greatbritishpublictoiletmap.rca.ac.uk/
Looking at the map locally I can see that access tags have been
omitted, those in Shrewsbury railway station
On Sun Dec 07 2014 12:51:32 GMT+ (GMT), Malcolm Herring wrote:
On 07/12/2014 12:39, Malcolm Herring wrote:
It also appears on Yahoo maps and Apple maps, in both cases as small
place only visible at high zooms.
... and on our map! http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/413600880
Its on
On Sun, 2014-12-21 at 14:39 +, David Woolley wrote:
On 21/12/14 13:56, SK53 wrote:
There are still one or two unharmonised tags for bookmakers: I moved a
few amenity=bookmaker to shop=bookmaker the other day. At least one was
one I created I'm pretty sure it was because I copied the
1 - 100 of 369 matches
Mail list logo
