Re: [Talk-GB] Other Routes With Public Access

2016-02-16 Thread Andy Townsend
On 14/02/2016 18:34, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: Routes marked by OS as "Other Route with Public Access" will most probably be routes that appear on the local Highway Authority's "List of Streets Maintainable at the Public Expense", but are not maintained to a standard for regular motor

Re: [Talk-GB] Other Routes With Public Access

2016-02-15 Thread Dudley Ibbett
if they will confirm the actual access for this particular highway. Kind Regards Dudley > Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 18:34:29 + > From: robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com > To: Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Other Routes With Public Access > > On 13 February 2016 at 14

Re: [Talk-GB] Other Routes With Public Access

2016-02-14 Thread Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
On 13 February 2016 at 14:57, Dudley Ibbett wrote: > I came across a paved single lane "road" on a recent walk that was sign > posted in both directions as a "Public Road" It makes a loop between two > "unclassified" roads. > Functionally, is seems to be a service route

Re: [Talk-GB] Other Routes With Public Access

2016-02-13 Thread Dudley Ibbett
Hi I came across a paved single lane "road" on a recent walk that was sign posted in both directions as a "Public Road" It makes a loop between two "unclassified" roads. Functionally, is seems to be a service route for an isolated farm that sits at the top of the loop, although it would make

Re: [Talk-GB] Other Routes With Public Access

2016-02-13 Thread Nick Whitelegg
___ From: Dudley Ibbett <dudleyibb...@hotmail.com> Sent: 13 February 2016 14:57 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Other Routes With Public Access Hi I came across a paved single lane "road" on a recent walk that was sign posted in both direction

Re: [Talk-GB] Other Routes With Public Access

2016-02-13 Thread Colin Smale
lt;dudleyibb...@hotmail.com> > SENT: 13 February 2016 14:57 > TO: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org > SUBJECT: Re: [Talk-GB] Other Routes With Public Access > > Hi > > I came across a paved single lane "road" on a recent walk that was sign > posted in both directions

[Talk-GB] Other Routes with Public Access

2011-03-24 Thread Mike Harris
PLEASE do not remove the ORPA designations - they are meaningful and important (in the UK). An ORPA is a way that is not a public right of way (i.e. public footpath, public bridleway, restricted byway or 'byway open to all traffic') but nevertheless has legal rights for at least pedestrian

Re: [Talk-GB] Other Routes with Public Access

2011-03-24 Thread Tom Hughes
On 24/03/11 09:10, Mike Harris wrote: PLEASE do not remove the ORPA designations - they are meaningful and important (in the UK). An ORPA is a way that is not a public right of way (i.e. public footpath, public bridleway, restricted byway or 'byway open to all traffic') but nevertheless has

Re: [Talk-GB] Other Routes with Public Access

2011-03-24 Thread Nick Whitelegg
What has been questioned is whether the information that a particular path has that designation has come from a legitimate unencumbered source .that we are able to use or whether it has come from sources which are subject to copyright and/or database right and which hence should not have been