[talk-au] Bing imagery around Burnie, Tas

Just noticed this mentioned in the weekly News. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/bdhurkett/diary/398063 Thanks Graeme ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [Talk-lv] bing imagery teritoriju dzēšana

On 2017.12.11. 10:28, Raitis Upmalis wrote: > +1 > Tagad ir daudz avoti, un tāpat šos neviens neuztur. paldies par atbildi. process izrādījās manāmi sāpīgaks, nekā sākumā šķita. pa šiem gadiem bija izveidotas kopīgas nodes ar ceļiem, landuse, upēm... sāku to visu tīrīt. iepazinu jaunus

Re: [Talk-lv] bing imagery teritoriju dzēšana

+1 Tagad ir daudz avoti, un tāpat šos neviens neuztur. 2017-12-10 21:15 GMT+02:00 Rihards : > kad mums bija tikai bing ortofoto, datos tika ielikti reģioni, kuros ir > labs pārklājums. > > vai ir kādi iebildumi, ja šie tiktu dzēsti ? > > piemēram :

[Talk-lv] bing imagery teritoriju dzēšana

kad mums bija tikai bing ortofoto, datos tika ielikti reģioni, kuros ir labs pārklājums. vai ir kādi iebildumi, ja šie tiktu dzēsti ? piemēram : https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/tIo -- Rihards ___ Talk-lv mailing list Talk-lv@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery round Bristol

got several months worth of house/building surveys to add -- and I'd got used to the stunning quality of the previous Bing imagery. Thanks, Neil ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-GB] Bing imagery round Bristol

thoughts appreciated -- I've got several months worth of house/building surveys to add -- and I'd got used to the stunning quality of the previous Bing imagery. Thanks, Neil ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-us] Bing imagery

My area here in Glendale Arizona and its surrounding area got a much needed update from Microsoft when they updated bing imagery last summer. Don't remember the month but i was really excited. I know they updated a lot of the major cities in the U.S, sadly they didn't touch any small towns that i

[Talk-us] Bing imagery

Is there any information on when we might see more recent imagery? There’s been a fair amount of infill development in my part of town, and I’d like to map outlines and parking rather than just points or approximations. I checked the available NAIP imagery for the area, and it seems to be of

[talk-ph] Bing Imagery

(but most things have already been traced from older Bing imagery) . and here are the same areas exported from JOSM : http://osm.totor.ph/Cebu_Missing_Bing.osm Cheers, Totor On Wed, 4/29/15, Celina Agaton wrote: Subject: Re: [talk-ph] Bing

Re: [talk-ph] Bing Imagery

Hello there, Bing is following up again on the missing imagery. Do we have a list or timeline on how long this will take to compile? We're also prepping to complete disaster risk mapping tasks in preparation for the typhoon season, so it would be helpful to secure imagery soon. Celina

Re: [talk-ph] Bing Imagery

Hi Maning, I'm talking to Bing and they are asking for a list of missing areas. Can you guys send me a list soon? Celina celinaagaton.com celina.aga...@gmail.com Twitter @celinaagaton http://twitter.com/celinaagaton Skype: celinaagaton On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 10:39 PM, maning

Re: [talk-ph] Bing Imagery

If we can get a list together I can put in a request. Celina celinaagaton.com celina.aga...@gmail.com Twitter @celinaagaton http://twitter.com/celinaagaton Skype: celinaagaton On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 8:00 PM, talk-ph-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote: Send talk-ph mailing list

Re: [talk-ph] Bing Imagery

To whom? cheers, Maning Sambale (mobile) On Apr 11, 2015 8:59 PM, Celina Agaton celina.aga...@gmail.com wrote: If we can get a list together I can put in a request. Celina celinaagaton.com celina.aga...@gmail.com Twitter @celinaagaton http://twitter.com/celinaagaton Skype:

Re: [talk-ph] Bing imagery update?

Hello everybody, I have finally investigated all of the new Bing imagery (at least I hope I did) that were added since September 2013. There are plenty of new areas added or updated: * Pangasinan is now almost 100% covered. There's new imagery that now covers some of the missing strips in

Re: [talk-ph] Bing imagery update?

Excellent! So far two uncovered provinces for Bing are Batanes and Siquijor. On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everybody, I have finally investigated all of the new Bing imagery (at least I hope I did) that were added since September 2013.

Re: [talk-ph] Bing imagery update?

On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 9:30 PM, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote: Excellent! So far two uncovered provinces for Bing are Batanes and Siquijor. Well, Romblon is hardly covered at all as well. Only a small sliver of Banton Island has Bing imagery

Re: [talk-ph] Bing imagery update?

Island has Bing imagery. :) ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https

Re: [talk-ph] Bing imagery update?

Not sure if these are new imagery as well, but, I saw that parts of Negros Island right at the edges where Haiyan mapping was done now have hires imagery. Ie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/10.9552/123.3080 On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote: When

[talk-ph] Bing imagery update?

Saw a diary post of bing imagery update [0], I haven't noticed one in Marikina. Please do check your patch. [0] http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/naoliv/diary/23577 -- cheers, maning -- Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden

Re: [talk-ph] Bing imagery update?

When I checked yesterday, the only new imagery I saw was covering a part of Sorsogon City. Actually, it's been a really long time since we've checked for new imagery so I'm not sure if the Sorsogon City imagery is really new or not. On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 4:28 AM, maning sambale

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery

[mailto:li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk] *Sent:* 04 March 2014 18:36 *To:* Eric Grosso *Cc:* talk-gb@openstreetmap.org *Subject:* Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery (taking these in a slightly different order) Eric Grosso wrote: So from my point of view, the problem described initially by Will is still a current

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery

a difference in caching which will presumably resolve itself fairly quickly. Cheers Andy *From:*SomeoneElse [mailto:li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk] *Sent:* 04 March 2014 18:36 *To:* Eric Grosso *Cc:* talk-gb@openstreetmap.org *Subject:* Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery (taking these in a slightly

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery

Try anywhere across Wolverhampton through Willenhall to Walsall - as you zoom through to level 19 you'll briefly see a nice sharp clear image which then reverts spontaneously to a less clear image with a huge shadow which furhter obscures detail. Regards Brian On 3 March 2014 18:42, Will

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery

Brian Prangle wrote: Try anywhere across Wolverhampton through Willenhall to Walsall - as you zoom through to level 19 you'll briefly see a nice sharp clear image which then reverts spontaneously to a less clear image with a huge shadow which furhter obscures detail. Have you got a link for

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery

Hi Andy, In Wolverhampton, there are different problems which are combined, not only a problem with the imagery at a zoom level higher than 19. To take an example, using the Bing maps website (http://www.bing.com/maps/) and searching for Birch street, the Bing aerial imagery with labels provides

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery

(taking these in a slightly different order) Eric Grosso wrote: So from my point of view, the problem described initially by Will is still a current one. Indeed - higher up this thread I mentioned a location in Mansfield which used to have z18 imagery and now no longer does for me (in

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery

: 04 March 2014 18:36 To: Eric Grosso Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery (taking these in a slightly different order) Eric Grosso wrote: So from my point of view, the problem described initially by Will is still a current one. Indeed - higher up this thread

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery

Zooming in on Nottingham I'm seeing three different imagery versions at different zoom levels. I don't anything missing. Cheers Andy -Original Message- From: jonathan [mailto:jonat...@bigfatfrog67.me] Sent: 02 March 2014 22:48 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Bing

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery

Andy Robinson wrote: Zooming in on Nottingham I'm seeing three different imagery versions at different zoom levels. I don't anything missing. Here's a specific example, to the north in Mansfield: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=potlatch2#map=19/53.14850/-1.18456 (using P2 because

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery - West Midlands

Interestingly, Bing imagery that was present in December but missing in January has now reappeared: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=potlatch2#map=18/52.72279/-2.12197 so perhaps some kind of scheduled renewal process? Cheers, Andy ___

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery

Hi all, I encountered exactly the same problem at the end of last week (before the higher zoom level images of my editing zone were still in cache and hid the problem) -- location: Edinburgh, Scotland. Apparently this problem appeared for some contributors at the beginning of last December: - (5

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery

Has anyone tried contacting Microsoft? Chris On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Eric Grosso eric.grosso...@gmail.comwrote: Hi all, I encountered exactly the same problem at the end of last week (before the higher zoom level images of my editing zone were still in cache and hid the problem)

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery

What I don't understand is why some people are seeing this problem but other aren't. I've just got someone who edits in another part of the country, and so will not be seeing cached images, to have a look at a location in my local area in JOSM. They could definitely see three different lots of

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery

Will, Could you please give an example of an area where the others, e.g. SK53, can see the high-resolution imagery in order to see if it works for us. Thanks, Eric On 3 March 2014 16:35, Will Phillips wp4...@gmail.com wrote: What I don't understand is why some people are seeing this problem

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery

Eric, Try here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=52.92611mlon=-1.21314#map=18/52.92611/-1.21314 At this location, I can see the roof of a supermarket at zoom level 19. I get a 'No tiles at this zoom level' message if I zoom in further. Previously, I would see an area of waste ground before

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery

Will, Thanks. Same here. Eric On 3 March 2014 18:42, Will Phillips wp4...@gmail.com wrote: Eric, Try here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=52.92611mlon=-1.21314#map=18/52.92611/-1.21314 At this location, I can see the roof of a supermarket at zoom level 19. I get a 'No tiles at

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery

Any comment from Microsoft on this? Chris On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 6:56 PM, SK53 sk53@gmail.com wrote: My impression is that the 2008 imagery (zoom 20 and 21 is still available in JOSM). It certainly would be a disappointment because the 2008 imagery was taken in good sunlight and is

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery

I noticed this also in a few areas, it seems the high resolution has been removed. It's still present around Chester though, so it isn't everywhere Regards Tony On 2 March 2014 12:21, Filip Chirita Rares Cristian chirita.ra...@gmail.com wrote: Any comment from Microsoft on this? Chris

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery

My impression is that the imagery at zoom level 20 has gone for most, if not all, the country. This might not be noticeable everywhere: many areas will have only ever had images up to level 19. Also, some of the level 19 imagery is well lit, sharp and not particularly different from what

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery

...@gmail.com] Sent: 02 March 2014 14:49 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery My impression is that the imagery at zoom level 20 has gone for most, if not all, the country. This might not be noticeable everywhere: many areas will have only ever had images up to level 19

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery

Yes, I was seeing that Steve. I assumed it was due to local caching by JOSM, you see your old version briefly before the newer tile is dragged down into the cache. I'm guessing but seems likely? Jonathan http://bigfatfrog67.me On 02/03/2014 15:39, Steve Brook wrote: I am getting a strange

[Talk-GB] Bing imagery

Since about last Tuesday, the highest resolution Bing aerial imagery is no longer available in the Nottingham and Derby area. Previously the imagery went up to zoom level 22, but this has now been reduced to level 19. I was wondering whether this is also the case in other parts of the country?

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery

My impression is that the 2008 imagery (zoom 20 and 21 is still available in JOSM). It certainly would be a disappointment because the 2008 imagery was taken in good sunlight and is mostly directly overhead. Jerry On 1 March 2014 18:41, Will Phillips wp4...@gmail.com wrote: Since about last

Re: [Talk-us] Bing imagery update

This seems to have some serious gaps in detail. For example, most of Portland and most of Tulsa is considered as having the same level of detail imagery available. Not so; I can barely make out centerlines and lane lines on the highest level of detail for the Tulsa area, whereas in Portland,

Re: [Talk-us] Bing imagery update

According to http://www.ncgicc.com/Default.aspx?tabid=135 and links therein, they are doing 1/4 of the state per year on a rolling basis. This year they photographed the eastern Piedmont and are currently getting it ready for release, probably in early 2014. In 2014 they are photographing

Re: [Talk-us] Bing imagery update

Mike N wrote: In my part of SC, Bing imagery has updated! Seems to be from this year; within the last month or so. New imagery in Fresno, too. When you're remapping rail yards, it's a lifesaver. Alexander ___ Talk-us mailing list

Re: [Talk-us] Bing imagery update

Check out Bing Aerial Imagery Analyzer for OpenStreetMap, http://ant.dev.openstreetmap.org/bingimageanalyzer/. Someone posted a link about it on the Canadian talk list this morning. Another one of Martijn van Exel great contributions to OSM. On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Alexander Jones

Re: [Talk-us] Bing imagery update

Whoa, nice work, Martijn! Thanks for calling it out, Clifford. This is really useful. -Steven -- SEJ -- twitter: @geomantic -- skype: sejohnson8 There are two types of people in the world. Those that can extrapolate from incomplete data. On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Clifford Snow

Re: [Talk-us] Bing imagery update

The site you are pointing to is actually a much improved fork of a much simpler thing I built a few years ago, so I can't take much credit for this :) On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us wrote: Check out Bing Aerial Imagery Analyzer for OpenStreetMap,

Re: [Talk-us] Bing imagery update

Clifford, great share! On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Martijn van Exel mart...@openstreetmap.uswrote: The site you are pointing to is actually a much improved fork of a much simpler thing I built a few years ago, so I can't take much credit for this :) On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:22 AM,

Re: [Talk-us] Bing imagery update

here is the original version, which shows things in a slightly different way, for reference: http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bingimageanalyzer/# On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Elliott Plack elliott.pl...@gmail.com wrote: Clifford, great share! On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Martijn

Re: [Talk-us] Bing imagery update

Martijn, Where do you get the date from? I suspect that it is encoded in the bing image tile. What are you using to grab the data? Clifford On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Martijn van Exel mart...@openstreetmap.uswrote: here is the original version, which shows things in a slightly

Re: [Talk-us] Bing imagery update

The HTTP response header of the tile image contains something like: X-VE-TILEMETA-CaptureDatesRange: 1/1/2012-1/1/2012 On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us wrote: Martijn, Where do you get the date from? I suspect that it is encoded in the bing image tile. What

Re: [Talk-us] Bing imagery update

I just wish Bing would update the imagery around Charlotte, NC. Especially because of the building of the missing link of I-485. And I can't forget to mention I-85 as well since it's being widened from 2 to 4 lanes going North from I-485. I so want to clean that major turbine interchange of

Re: [Talk-us] Bing imagery update

On 12/4/13 8:07 PM, James Mast wrote: I just wish Bing would update the imagery around Charlotte, NC. Especially because of the building of the missing link of I-485. And I can't forget to mention I-85 as well since it's being widened from 2 to 4 lanes going North from I-485. I so want to

Re: [Talk-us] Bing imagery update

: James Mast [mailto:rickmastfa...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 5:08 PM To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Bing imagery update I just wish Bing would update the imagery around Charlotte, NC. Especially because of the building of the missing link of I-485

Re: [Talk-us] Bing imagery update

Unfortunately, in my area (Burlington VT), it seems like the 2008-era high resolution images (zoom 20?) are no longer available, and only the 2010? era zoom 19 are there. On the Bing website I can still see the higher resolution images, but neither JOSM nor the Bing Imagery Analyzer is

Re: [Talk-us] Bing imagery update

On 12/4/2013 9:07 PM, Kam, Kristen -(p) wrote: James, I located NAIP imagery for the state of North Carolina. That prompted my recall of an open NC state-run offleaf imagery source. It worked in JOSM back in 2010. I see that they have updated some coastal imagery in 2012; I'm not sure

Re: [Talk-us] Bing imagery update

You can view this information in JOSM as well. If Bing is the only imagery visible you can right click and choose Show Tile Info Toby On Dec 4, 2013 5:42 PM, Martijn van Exel mart...@openstreetmap.us wrote: The HTTP response header of the tile image contains something like:

[Talk-us] Bing imagery update

In my part of SC, Bing imagery has updated! Seems to be from this year; within the last month or so. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[OSM-talk] Missing Bing Imagery in Parts of Costa Rica

Recently I had the opportunity to visit Costa Rica. When attempting to add detail to a hotel/hot springs I discovered that Bing didn't have images for the area. The images were missing from Potlatch/JOSM as well as Bing Maps. Bing personal confirmed with me that they had no images for the area.

Re: [Talk-it] Fwd: [OSM-talk] New Bing imagery blog post

: [OSM-talk] New Bing imagery blog post To: t...@openstreetmap.org http://www.bing.com/community/site_blogs/b/maps/archive/2012/06/25/released-our-largest-satellite-publication.aspx cheers Richard ___ talk mailing list t...@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-it] Fwd: [OSM-talk] New Bing imagery blog post

Domanda stupida da programmatore : visto che abbiamo per ogni zona degli edifici la cui posizione è certa, non sarebbe tecnicamente fattibile correggere la posizione georeferenziata? Per esempio se sto mappando una zona sarebbe interessante poter muovere limitatamente e in modo controllato

Re: [Talk-it] Fwd: [OSM-talk] New Bing imagery blog post

Il giorno 26 giugno 2012 09:49, Stefano Fraccaro stefano.fracc...@libero.it ha scritto: Domanda stupida da programmatore : visto che abbiamo per ogni zona degli edifici la cui posizione è certa, non sarebbe tecnicamente fattibile correggere la posizione georeferenziata? Per esempio se sto

Re: [Talk-it] Fwd: [OSM-talk] New Bing imagery blog post

2012/6/26 Maurizio Daniele maurizio.dani...@gmail.com: Le immagini di Bing sono una manna per la mappatura, specie perché sono molto recenti e quindi si vedono anche parecchie strade in costruzione o che erano in costruzione all'epoca della foto e che sono state aperte di recente. Inoltre

Re: [Talk-it] Fwd: [OSM-talk] New Bing imagery blog post

2012/6/26 Stefano Fraccaro stefano.fracc...@libero.it: Domanda stupida da programmatore : visto che abbiamo per ogni zona degli edifici la cui posizione è certa, non sarebbe tecnicamente fattibile correggere la posizione georeferenziata? C'è una iniziativa per farlo, ma non so a che punto

[OSM-talk] New Bing imagery blog post

http://www.bing.com/community/site_blogs/b/maps/archive/2012/06/25/released-our-largest-satellite-publication.aspx cheers Richard ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[Talk-it] Fwd: [OSM-talk] New Bing imagery blog post

nuove immagini bing disponibili per OSM. -- Forwarded message -- From: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net Date: Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:17 AM Subject: [OSM-talk] New Bing imagery blog post To: t...@openstreetmap.org http://www.bing.com/community/site_blogs/b/maps/archive

Re: [Talk-us] Bing Imagery link changed for JOSM?

On 6/13/2012 5:22 AM, James Mast wrote: I've also noticed this in the happening in St. Louis along I-64. JOSM is still loading the old imagery, while Potlatch 2 is getting the newer imagery. From a similar thread on talk... right-click on the editing area and select 'Flush tile cache'.

Re: [Talk-us] Bing Imagery link changed for JOSM?

On 6/13/2012 12:13 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: Perhaps you're zoomed in too far. PL2 also gives the old imagery at zoom 20: It's also possible that they're rolling out the new stuff in stages to different servers behind the load sharing server. So that might be why some solutions work

Re: [Talk-us] Bing Imagery link changed for JOSM?

On 6/13/2012 2:09 PM, Mike N wrote: It's also possible that they're rolling out the new stuff in stages to different servers behind the load sharing server. OK, I'm officially stumped. I have 2 instances of JOSM - one 'works', and the other always shows the 'old imagery'. I removed all

[Talk-GB] Bing imagery update? using photo's from late 2011?

I've just noticed an update to Bing imagery in the UK. Area I was looking at was Torbay, Devon. [link http://binged.it/yq8NYY]. The updates images are not available at full zoom for some reason, so by zooming all the way in you can see the previous images. Finding it hard to give a date to the

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery update? using photo's from late 2011?

On 9 March 2012 14:22, Mike Valiant mike_vali...@hotmail.com wrote: On their website, if you select Bird's Eye view then the view stays the same to maximum resolution. If however you select Aerial view it uses images taken at a different time and then flips to the Bird's Eye view at the

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery update? using photo's from late 2011?

http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bing/ is the best method of checking imagery date Cheers Andy From: Jason Cunningham [mailto:jamicu...@googlemail.com] Sent: 09 March 2012 13:26 To: Talk GB Subject: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery update? using photo's from late 2011? I've just noticed

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing Imagery update

Zoom 21 contains the photos Bing have of inside your house. Not publicly available for obvious reasons. /joke The documentation is here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bing_imagery_analyzer_for_OSM On 25 December 2011 13:55, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote: You wrote (offlist reply): I

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing Imagery update

I thought I had replied here already... You can tell the date of a tile by using this tool http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bing/ (zoom in to see the dates of high zoom levels). I listed it as the second Christmas present to mappers.

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing Imagery update

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 06:05:43PM +, Robert Norris wrote: Not sure how widespread the update is, but certainly the Bing Imagery covering the Isle of Wight has recently been updated to imagery taken within the last few months. Goes off to check nearby Portsmouth Yay finally

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing Imagery update

Not sure how widespread the update is, but certainly the Bing Imagery covering the Isle of Wight has recently been updated to imagery taken within the last few months. There is new imagery (within ~6 months) in the North Yorkshire area. Specifically I've seen new imagery just south of

[Talk-GB] Bing imagery alignment in Potlatch 2

In this area Bing is a few metres out of alignment with features traced from historic maps and town plans. Yahoo imagery lower res seemed to fit better. A way to drag base layer like in JOSM. Or can it be corrected at source? phone: +441316502973 talk-gb-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:

Re: [Talk-GB] Bing imagery alignment in Potlatch 2

Jo Walsh wrote: A way to drag base layer like in JOSM. Hold Space and drag. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Bing-imagery-alignment-in-Potlatch-2-tp6638302p6638356.html Sent from the Great Britain mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [OSM-talk] Better Bing imagery in Potlatch?

2011/5/30 colliar colliar4e...@aol.com: Yes, that did the trick for mee too. It was on 17. Maybe a ticket on josm trac asking for a high default level would be useful. +1, in some urban areas the zoom goes up to level 21. cheers, Martin ___ talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Better Bing imagery in Potlatch?

Am 29.05.2011 11:37, schrieb Maarten Deen: Erik Lundin wrote: Thanks, this was helpful. My JOSM had max zoom level set to 17. Changing it to 18 or 19 gives a significant increase of the resolution. Just a small difference between 18/19 in this case. Yes, that did the trick for mee too. It

Re: [OSM-talk] Better Bing imagery in Potlatch?

Erik Lundin wrote: Thanks, this was helpful. My JOSM had max zoom level set to 17. Changing it to 18 or 19 gives a significant increase of the resolution. Just a small difference between 18/19 in this case. Yes, that did the trick for mee too. It was on 17. Regards, Maarten 2011-05-28

[OSM-ja] JOSMの衛星画像解像度が低いとお感じの方へ(Was: [OSM-talk] Better Bing imagery in Potlatch?)

=139.29753739096566zoom=7 東 -- Forwarded message -- From: Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 15:29:23 +0200 Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Better Bing imagery in Potlatch? To: Talk Openstreetmap t...@openstreetmap.org Cc: josm-dev josm-...@openstreetmap.org Paul Hartmann

[OSM-talk] Better Bing imagery in Potlatch?

Does Potlatch have access to better BING imagery? I'm looking at Walbeck in Germany http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.495886lon=6.243827zoom=18 and in Potlatch 2 the imagery is a lot better than in JOSM. In the imagery settings I have bing:bing for Bing Sat. Regards, Maarten

Re: [OSM-talk] Better Bing imagery in Potlatch?

Maarten Deen wrote: Does Potlatch have access to better BING imagery? I'm looking at Walbeck in Germany http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.495886lon=6.243827zoom=18 and in Potlatch 2 the imagery is a lot better than in JOSM. In the imagery settings I have bing:bing for Bing Sat. Cannot

Re: [OSM-talk] Better Bing imagery in Potlatch?

Paul Hartmann wrote: Maarten Deen wrote: Does Potlatch have access to better BING imagery? I'm looking at Walbeck in Germany http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.495886lon=6.243827zoom=18 and in Potlatch 2 the imagery is a lot better than in JOSM. In the imagery settings I have bing:bing for

Re: [OSM-talk] Better Bing imagery in Potlatch?

On 28/05/11 13:08, Maarten Deen wrote: Does Potlatch have access to better BING imagery? I'm looking at Walbeck in Germany http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.495886lon=6.243827zoom=18 and in Potlatch 2 the imagery is a lot better than in JOSM. In the imagery settings I have bing:bing for Bing

Re: [OSM-talk] Better Bing imagery in Potlatch?

Thanks, this was helpful. My JOSM had max zoom level set to 17. Changing it to 18 or 19 gives a significant increase of the resolution. Just a small difference between 18/19 in this case. /Erik 2011-05-28 16:07, Tom Hughes skrev: On 28/05/11 13:08, Maarten Deen wrote: Does Potlatch have

Re: [Talk-in] Bing imagery

On Sat, 2010-12-25 at 18:56 +0530, Arun Ganesh wrote: To use the imagery, correct the offset by aligning it to the downloaded gps traces. In josm, right click the imagery layer in the layers panel and select the offset function. I do not see an imagery layer -- regards Kenneth Gonsalves

Re: [Talk-in] Bing imagery

On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 12:32 +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: On Sat, 2010-12-25 at 18:56 +0530, Arun Ganesh wrote: To use the imagery, correct the offset by aligning it to the downloaded gps traces. In josm, right click the imagery layer in the layers panel and select the offset function.

Re: [Talk-in] Bing imagery

On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.orgwrote: On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 12:32 +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: On Sat, 2010-12-25 at 18:56 +0530, Arun Ganesh wrote: To use the imagery, correct the offset by aligning it to the downloaded gps traces. In josm,

Re: [Talk-in] Bing imagery

On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 13:00 +0530, Arun Ganesh wrote: got it now - it is in josm-latest. Fixed the offset, checked against my traces, book marked it and now all ready to trace! the new josm is really great with the integrated imagery support. makes it so much more faster to work on.

Re: [Talk-in] Bing imagery

On Fri, 2010-12-24 at 10:37 +0530, Tecoholic Maps wrote: Hello OSMers, All of you would have been aware of the fact that microsoft has allowed us to use its aerial imagery for tracing. But there is no data about the high resolution coverage in India. I think no one has taken any active step

Re: [Talk-in] Bing imagery

On Sat, 2010-12-25 at 18:25 +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: I checked it against tracks made by my metre accurate GPS instrument. chennai seems accurate - but it is the same map as yahoo - but has one more zoom level. Mangalore is b0rked, but not as bad as Coimbatore. -- regards Kenneth

Re: [Talk-in] Bing imagery

The areas that are skewed are same as that of landsat imagery, a very weird phenomenon. I've noticed this in coimbatore and kanniyakumari districts so far. To use the imagery, correct the offset by aligning it to the downloaded gps traces. In josm, right click the imagery layer in the layers

Re: [Talk-in] Bing imagery

On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.orgwrote: On Sat, 2010-12-25 at 18:25 +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: I checked it against tracks made by my metre accurate GPS instrument. Kenneth, how did you measure the gps accuracy? chennai seems accurate - but it

Re: [Talk-in] Bing imagery

On Sat, 2010-12-25 at 18:59 +0530, Arun Ganesh wrote: On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.orgwrote: On Sat, 2010-12-25 at 18:25 +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: I checked it against tracks made by my metre accurate GPS instrument. Kenneth, how did you

[Talk-in] Bing imagery

Hello OSMers, All of you would have been aware of the fact that microsoft has allowed us to use its aerial imagery for tracing. But there is no data about the high resolution coverage in India. I think no one has taken any active step to list the coverage areas or that it has not been updated at

Re: [Talk-in] bing imagery

On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 19:32 +0530, Subhodip Biswas wrote: So if I use the Bing Image service and contribute a map to OSM and at the same time I use that map for a Fleet management system of mine. WIill I be at stake? osm license allows you to use osm data for the fleet management. You cant

  1   2   >