2009/12/7 Matija Nalis mnalis-openstreetmapl...@voyager.hr
BTW, sto ste u auto imali od opreme (GPSovi/fottachi), dopisite na:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/2009.11.29_-_prvi_mapping_party
Naša oprema je već upisana, Marko na tebi je red. :)
Željko
Ubacio link na slike na flickru (
http://www.flickr.com/photos/7387...@n08/tags/mappingparty/) na
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/2009.11.29_-_prvi_mapping_party
Željko
___
Talk-hr mailing list
Talk-hr@openstreetmap.org
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
ava...@gmail.com wrote:
So my question is:
1. The closed issue I referred to contains the text OSMF counsel
does not believe on something that seems to have fundamental
significance to how the transition will be performed. Specifically
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 07:09:30PM +0100, Mike Collinson wrote:
I believe there was a discussion that viral does necessarily mean
reciprocal, hence the use of the word. I'll check tomorrow if no one else
comes back.
If you get down to various meanings already documented in English,
neither
Sorry, but I don't see a lot of OSM people going over to 'the dark
side'. No matter how good or bad OSM is being run.
If I don't agree with how things are being done here at OSM then I'll
try to fix it, work around it or quit, but I'm *not* going to be an
unpaid employee for Google's mega
Steve Bennett stevagewp at gmail.com writes:
What about architect=yes, like you get for bridge, area, building... Seems
to work well. And then, if and when you have more information to add (eg,
lawyer=immigration), you have somewhere to add it.Steve
For people using OSM data through some
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 9:19 PM, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote:
Sorry to be pedantic but the wording of the OSMF member vote is:
Do you approve the process of moving OpenStreetMap to the ODbL?
Yes, I approve.
No, I do not approve.
Unfortunately this sentence on which we are asked
Seems fine for me. I'm still looking for a new key for jobs like
lawyers, architects, notary, etc. It was suggested to use office=*
in some older thread. I will create a similar proposal as yours on the
wiki.
Yes, that's cool! It has been supposed to get a list from an external
resource
- Original Message -
From: Dave Stubbs osm.l...@randomjunk.co.uk
To: David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net
Cc: talk openstreetmap.org talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OSM Licence vote
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 9:19 PM, David Groom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Lambertus schreef:
Sorry, but I don't see a lot of OSM people going over to 'the dark
side'. No matter how good or bad OSM is being run.
If I don't agree with how things are being done here at OSM then I'll
try to fix it, work around it or
2009/12/7 Jukka Rahkonen jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi
Steve Bennett stevagewp at gmail.com writes:
What about architect=yes, like you get for bridge, area, building...
Seems
to work well. And then, if and when you have more information to add (eg,
lawyer=immigration), you have somewhere to
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Richard Bullock rb...@cantab.net wrote:
Maybe we should be mapping slipways, hopefully there's a better approach
than marking them all as fully fledged roads though.
Sliproads are tagged as highway=xyz_link
e.g. a sliproad to a motorway would be
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Can renderers improve their render quality at lower zoom levels by not
rendering (certain) link roads? Ie, given road A-B-C, with incoming road
D-B, and link D-A, perhaps it could not render D-A.
Cartographers (people)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Maarten Deen schreef:
You cannot see the process how Cloudmade, Geofabrik and others process
their data. You do not get anything back from how companies that use OSM
for visual representation. And if Google offers OSM in GoogleEarth and
maps you
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
You could easily choose to not show secondary_link at scales of your
choice. Whether that is an improvement in rendering quality or not
would be a judgment call and should consider the intent of your
rendering and the
Dunno about the rest of you, but I fantasise about the day that a taxi
driver takes me through a shortcut that I added to OSM... I map on OSM
because I want everyone to have the changes, not because I'm on an open
source crusade.
(I'll be quiet again.)
Steve
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 7:48 AM, Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de wrote:
And if Google offers OSM in GoogleEarth and
maps you are actually benefiting from several things that you cannot get
now:
- - Massive adoption, visibility to the general public
- - Hosting, no more slow world wide tile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Anthony schreef:
There's nothing stopping them from putting the tile servers behind a
restrictive TOS, requiring a key to use the API, and limiting the number
of accesses per key, is there?
Is there for Cloudmade? The routing api, their custom
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de wrote:
Anthony schreef:
There's nothing stopping them from putting the tile servers behind a
restrictive TOS, requiring a key to use the API, and limiting the number
of accesses per key, is there?
Is there for Cloudmade?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Anthony schreef:
You're confusing me with Lambertus. I never said anything good about
Cloudmade.
I'm not confusing you; it is current practice that the data is used. I
thought that was a /good/ thing. At least I came here for the usage of
data
Nick, Oleg,
thank you for answering.
I'm quite surprised that you are working directly from the API. Nick writes:
The server is actually quite responsive for POIs - maybe its because
node queries are faster than way queries and because the bboxes are
generally very small (equal to a few
I still think that you misunderstand me, or maybe I misunderstand you. I
thought that Jonh Smith was talking about users starting to map in
Google's MapMaker and I responded that I would never do that. There is a
big difference between CM, GF etc that use OSM and Google owning the
data and not
On 07/12/09 14:16, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Nick, Oleg,
thank you for answering.
I'm quite surprised that you are working directly from the API. Nick writes:
The server is actually quite responsive for POIs - maybe its because
node queries are faster than way queries and because the
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
ava...@gmail.com wrote:
So my question is:
1. The closed issue I referred to contains the text OSMF counsel
does not believe on something that seems to have fundamental
significance to how the transition will be performed. Specifically
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Anthony schreef:
You're confusing me with Lambertus. I never said anything good about
Cloudmade.
I'm not confusing you; it is current practice that the data is used.
A call to get only points is certainly something we could add and it
would certainly save quite a bit of work on the server over the normal
map call and hence hopefully speed things up.
What would be really good, I think, to avoid conflicts is to add some API
code which refuses to add a POI if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Lambertus schreef:
I have no problems with Google using my data, but only if others can
use it too, which means that the database should be accessible (the
planet dump). Your contributions are PD, which goes ever further, so
you agree with this?
Anthony osm at inbox.org writes:
Why do people believe that there no creative copyright in OSM data
I'm going with that assumption because that's what the OSM, Creative Commons,
and Open Data Commons, all are telling us.
Do you have sources for that? I haven't seen any statement by the OSMF
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 14:32, Matt Amos zerebub...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
ava...@gmail.com wrote:
So my question is:
1. The closed issue I referred to contains the text OSMF counsel
does not believe on something that seems to have
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Anthony osm at inbox.org writes:
Why do people believe that there no creative copyright in OSM data
I'm going with that assumption because that's what the OSM, Creative
Commons,
and Open Data Commons, all are telling us.
Well TRAPI already exists for the purpose of providing efficient read
only access to the data for an area.
From the TRAPI wiki page:
Trapi does not store all tags, so Trapi data should not be used to
edit and upload back to openstreetmap.
Peter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Peter Körner schreef:
Well TRAPI already exists for the purpose of providing efficient read
only access to the data for an area.
From the TRAPI wiki page:
Trapi does not store all tags, so Trapi data should not be used to
edit and
My major concern with a license change is compatibility with
CC-BY-SA sources such as dbpedia, wikipedia, etc.
So far as I'm concerned, dbpedia and freebase are the core of a
linked data space that assigns taxonomic identifiers to (most) things
that exist, and will really be
On Dec 7, 2009, at 5:48 AM, Stefan de Konink wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Lambertus schreef:
I'm just curious... why?
You misunderstand: Google would get my data for free and keep it closed.
You'd only be able to use it the way Google intends it to be used:
On Dec 7, 2009, at 7:16 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Nick, Oleg,
thank you for answering.
I'm quite surprised that you are working directly from the API. Nick writes:
The server is actually quite responsive for POIs - maybe its because
node queries are faster than way queries and
Really, considering how many discussions about how to map things (just
recall all those footway/cycleway discussions) have been on these lists, at
least tagging seems to be a creative process right now.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:11
On Dec 6, 2009, at 1:48 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 4:53 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Well, you may think Creative Commons is stupid, but I hope others will
give them a chance and listen to what they have to say. I think they will,
considering that Creative
On Dec 6, 2009, at 2:03 AM, 80n wrote:
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 6:00 AM, Matt Amos zerebub...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de wrote:
Matt Amos schreef:
we're talking about moving to another
license with very similar requirements, but a
I wonder how easy it is in fact to usefully take the OSM data without giving
things back, even with the current license. Seems to me, not so easy. OSM
data is not perfect. To create a value-add, a commercial entity would have
to extend it. So let's say they do in some non-trivial way (e.g. not
On Dec 7, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Michael Barabanov wrote:
I wonder how easy it is in fact to usefully take the OSM data without giving
things back, even with the current license. Seems to me, not so easy. OSM
data is not perfect. To create a value-add, a commercial entity would have to
On Dec 5, 2009, at 8:25 PM, 80n wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:41 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Dec 5, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Ulf Lamping wrote:
Remember: Steve is the head of the OSMF, so this is the OSMF Chairman's
position about other peoples opinions when they don't share his
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
SteveC schreef:
You cannot see the process how Cloudmade, Geofabrik and others
process their data.
Well the huge difference is that OSM is under a reciprocal license,
What a difficult set of words were that; honestly never heard of those
On Dec 7, 2009, at 10:17 AM, Stefan de Konink wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
SteveC schreef:
You cannot see the process how Cloudmade, Geofabrik and others
process their data.
Well the huge difference is that OSM is under a reciprocal license,
What a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
SteveC schreef:
I have no idea what that means.
I had no idea about reciprocal license either.
Ask Google. It might have something to do with the fact that they
want to own all the data. Hint hint.
I have asked Google; Tim was sitting there
On Dec 7, 2009, at 10:30 AM, Stefan de Konink wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
SteveC schreef:
I have no idea what that means.
I had no idea about reciprocal license either.
Ask Google. It might have something to do with the fact that they
want to own all the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
SteveC schreef:
I think that developing their own tools, infrastructure, branding,
product management... for MapMaker might give away what they think
about that.
I think you are a little bit biased. Only a little bit :) And if this
is/becomes
On Dec 7, 2009, at 10:40 AM, Stefan de Konink wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
SteveC schreef:
I think that developing their own tools, infrastructure, branding,
product management... for MapMaker might give away what they think
about that.
I think you are a
I have some questions about standard practices for coastlines and
structures that define or protrude from the coast. Is there a
specific place for discussion of this topic area, or is this list the
best place?
Thanks,
David.
___
talk mailing list
Am 06.12.2009 12:24, Ciprian Talaba:
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
mailto:frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Steve Bennett wrote:
Wondering if there is a site that overlays OSM data over
GoogleMaps (or
any other site, for that
At 12:28 AM 7/12/2009, Simon Ward wrote:
Ive received the mail, answered the poll, and also the preference poll.
In the preference poll, I understand the term viral licenseâ but ask
that people refrain from using that term: It has the implication that
it is a bad thing - it may be in some
Hi,
Michael Barabanov wrote:
To create a value-add, a commercial
entity would have to extend it.
That surely is one way to create added value.
So let's say they do in some
non-trivial way (e.g. not just copy the data wholesale or just create POIs).
The next few updates of OSM in the area
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Claudius claudiu...@gmx.de wrote:
Or (sorry it is available only in romanian, but try Hibrid):
www.openmap.ro http://www.openmap.ro. The data is available worldwide.
--Ciprian
Now that's a cool presentation. Did you ever thought about rendering
Jonas Krückel osm at jonas-krueckel.de writes:
I'm not sure if the CC-BY-SA license is really simpler than ODbL. Just look at
this website here http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/summary/ and
you'll see that the ODbL is as simple as CC-BY-SA.
That summary page is great but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Frederik Ramm schreef:
Totally true, and actually a good argument for the PD case. Anyone who
takes OSM data and improves it privately is likely to to invest much
more in tracking OSM than it would cost him to just release his data
into OSM
SteveC steve at asklater.com writes:
With a gun at their head: Refuse: After the migration (currently 26th
February 2010), your contributions will not be included in ODbL licensed
downloads and you will not be able to continue contributing..
If you call this a vote, then we have pretty
Hi all,
Here's the link to the Google earth kml overlay that can do transparencies.
I use it with the yahoo imagery the OpenCycleMap layer on, and all the
other layers off.
It works great!
Cristian Streng http://www.mgmaps.com/feedback.php?topic=18 is working on
it, so far the OSM Appribution
SteveC steve at asklater.com writes:
It is not very wise of ODbL
proponents to claim that CC say that CC-BY-SA doesn't work for data
without also admitting that CC recommend CC0 for data.
Personally I don't because the former is a legal opinion and the latter is a
moral crusade opinion.
At 09:24 PM 6/12/2009, morb@beagle.com.au wrote:
Quoting Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Part of me suspects that this whole notion of removing contributions from
people who don't agree is going to get dropped. At least for the
contributors who don't respond one way or the other. It's just going
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Matt Amos zerebub...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
ava...@gmail.com wrote:
So my question is:
1. The closed issue I referred to contains the text OSMF counsel
does not believe on something that seems to have
2009/12/7 Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com:
Jonas Krückel osm at jonas-krueckel.de writes:
I'm not sure if the CC-BY-SA license is really simpler than ODbL. Just look at
this website here http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/summary/ and
you'll see that the ODbL is as simple as CC-BY-SA.
On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Ed Avis wrote:
SteveC steve at asklater.com writes:
With a gun at their head: Refuse: After the migration (currently 26th
February 2010), your contributions will not be included in ODbL licensed
downloads and you will not be able to continue contributing..
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Matt Amos wrote:
let's take a look at some evidence, the doodle.com poll. currently there
are 225 respondents, breaking down into 76% yes, 12% no and 12% don't
know. that's a significant proportion of yes.
furthermore, 62% of yes correspondents feel that their data should
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
That poll is evidence that the poll should cover all users.
225 respondents out of tens of thousands of contributors will not reach
significance.
I agree, this poll has no scientific value as people might reply
multiple times and
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Pieren wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
That poll is evidence that the poll should cover all users.
225 respondents out of tens of thousands of contributors will not reach
significance.
I agree, this poll has no scientific value as
Hello,
I'm making clear my knowledge about OpenData License and I have
specified a practical example from cartographic practice on the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Use_Cases#Map_composite_from_OSM_and_commercial_data
Is there anyone to answer OK or not OK according
2009/12/8 Paul Houle p...@ontology2.com:
My major concern with a license change is compatibility with
CC-BY-SA sources such as dbpedia, wikipedia, etc.
So far as I'm concerned, dbpedia and freebase are the core of a
linked data space that assigns taxonomic identifiers to (most)
2009/12/8 David Fawcett david.fawc...@gmail.com:
I have some questions about standard practices for coastlines and
structures that define or protrude from the coast. Is there a
specific place for discussion of this topic area, or is this list the
best place?
For tagging, there is now a
- Original Message -
From: David Fawcett david.fawc...@gmail.com
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 5:51 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Coastlines and Structures
I have some questions about standard practices for coastlines and
structures that define or protrude from
Can I also be sorry for being pedantic and point out an issue with the
license.
The OSMF decided to base themselves in the UK and is
A company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales. Company
Registration Number: 05912761
The Articles of Association [
2009/12/7 Paul Houle p...@ontology2.com
My major concern with a license change is compatibility with
CC-BY-SA sources such as dbpedia, wikipedia, etc.
In the short term I'm primarily concerned w/ displaying slippy maps
to display CC-BY-SA and PD-derived coordinates and shapes on.
2009/12/8 Jason Cunningham jamicu...@googlemail.com
(I think I support the licence/license change, but I need to read more.
Sadly not a member of the OSMF because of their links with Paypal, a point
of principle for me)
You might want to take a look that this page...
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Michael Barabanov
michael.baraba...@gmail.com wrote:
Really, considering how many discussions about how to map things (just
recall all those footway/cycleway discussions) have been on these lists, at
least tagging seems to be a creative process right now.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Mike Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz wrote:
We really, really, really, like to keep your and everyone's edits going
forward. But we have to respect your choice. Under the current regime, you
are allowing your contributions to be used only under CC BY SA 2.0. We
2009/12/8 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
But if it's copyrighted, who owns the copyright on it? Each person who uses
the tag? The people who participate in the list discussion? The OSMF?
You own the copyright on your changes but you also agreed to release
it at present under CC-BY-SA, as does
Anthony osm at inbox.org writes:
What about dual licensing under CC-BY-SA and ODbL? That way you can keep the
CC-BY-SA contributions.Of course, it doesn't make much sense, because the whole
point of ODbL is that it's more restrictive than CC-BY-SA.
It makes a little bit of sense: the ODbL does
Margus Värton wrote:
I am glad to inform You that CORINE Land Cover data for Estonia is
currently being imported. It takes some time and some manual or
semi-manual intervention but in few days we should have much improved
map data.
CORINE Land Cover data import for Estonia completed,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Rejo Zenger schreef:
++ 07/12/09 01:35 +0100 - Stefan de Konink:
Voor mij betekent het apart zetten van de niet geclearde data, op een
plaats waar het mag bit-rotten, hetzelfde als weggooien.
Waarom zou het gaan bitrotten als de mensen die niet
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, John Smith wrote:
So to me, the devil is in the details and I think we need to try and
get our own legal advice on how it will effect us in Australia because
so far they have had 5 legal opinions, but only for the UK and the US.
and we are not in a position to agree to a
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Liz wrote:
and we are not in a position to agree to a change without am opinion by a
lawyer on our lawyer, not a licence working group member's opinion on our
law.
James has been pointing out that the Feds, who can afford good lawyers,
find CC-by-Sa and CC-by as quite
2009/12/7 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
and we are not in a position to agree to a change without am opinion by a
lawyer on our lawyer, not a licence working group member's opinion on our law.
I agree, but I don't have any legal resources at my disposal, although
the OSGeo guys might.
James has been
On 07/12/2009, at 7:29 PM, John Smith wrote:
2009/12/7 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
James has been pointing out that the Feds, who can afford good lawyers, find
CC-by-Sa and CC-by as quite satisfactory in Australia.
As far as I can gather CC-BY-SA most likely won't work in the US, so I
can only
I came across this today*, if it is of any interest:
http://www.ands.org.au/guides/cc-and-data.html
Steve
* At work. Legitimately work related!
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
I'll be driving from Canberra to Adelaide on December 22nd.
Normally I would turn left at Balranald but I coulf just go straight ahead
and maybe survey Paringa and stay overnight at Renmark.
On the way out (Jan 3) I could do a little bit more... I was contemplating
Manangatang but someone seems
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Steve Bennett wrote:
I came across this today*, if it is of any interest:
http://www.ands.org.au/guides/cc-and-data.html
Steve
* At work. Legitimately work related!
well it is of interest
the whole collection is protected under the Australian version (in Australia I
-- Forwarded message --
From: pcr...@pcreso.com
Date: 2009/12/8
Subject: Re: [Aust-NZ] Anyone able to get/offer proper legal advice over ODBL?
To: aust...@lists.osgeo.org, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
Hi John,
Not legal advice, but some comments/concerns based on what I
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm looking to use Nearmap with JOSM. I was doing so quite happily
with the old instructions (using the tested version from bigtincan as
listed in the Nearmap page on the Wiki) but I made the mistake of
upgrading JOSM, as
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried using Potlatch, but I've not used it before, and it's driving
me mad. I'm tempted to try Merkaartor, but I'm used to JOSM, I'd
rather get it working if I could. I tried
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, you wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
JOSM and Potlatch are not a feature choice, but
how_you_like_to_use_your_computer choice.
As a keyboard user who started in the 60s (it was a typewriter then) the
keyboard shortcuts in JOSM are
JOSM can be used offline,
So far all that's done for me is lose a chunk of edits when they conflicted
at upload time. :( (I don't really do offline anymore...)
you can use it to import data.
Do you do that much? Where do you get it from?
Less responsive. Using an applet in a browser is
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
don't know what is avail in potlatch overall
a is 'add' mode
s is 'select' mode
d is 'delete' mode
u is unselect
Oh yeah, good old modal editing :) It's like using vim. I found this
horribly tedious. In potlatch,
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
doing things, that's all. I started out when the only Potlatch
editing mode was live editing - and I'm used to doing things, checking
them, and then pushing save if I'm happy. This made me immediately
look for something
Em Sex, 2009-12-04 às 20:28 +, Aun Johnsen escreveu:
Viu que distancia Vitoria (ES) pela Rio de Janeiro (RJ) e 2001km, mas
Rio de Janeiro (RJ) pela Vitoria (ES) so e 543km. Parecendo que o
caminho Vitoria pela Rio passa por Belo Horizonte a Sao Paulo...
2009/12/4 Vitor George
Neste final de semana tentei acertar a Dutra sentido Rio-SP. Nào consegui
fazer o plugin de routing do JOSM funcionar para testar, mas creio que não
vai haver problemas.
Alguém está usando ou usou este plugin? Consigo instalar e fazer o layer de
rotas aparecer, mas simplesmente não consigo
Eu consertei algumas coisas no Nordeste. Você poderia rodar o script de novo
e atualizar a página? :P. Semana de provas e eu ainda invento isso...
2009/12/7 Vitor George vitor.geo...@gmail.com
Neste final de semana tentei acertar a Dutra sentido Rio-SP. Nào consegui
fazer o plugin de routing
Posso rodar sim, mas é bom vc dar uma olhada se a sua rota correta já
apareceu no mapa da cloudmade, pois, senão, a rota vai continuar aparecendo
errada. Creio que demora alguns dias para aparecer.
O ideal seríamos adaptar o script para usar um brasil.osm offline, e assim
podemos rodar mais
Fala Flavio,
Acabei postando no wiki, mas vou replicar uma dúvida aqui.
Não será melhor focarmos nas capitais na primeira fase e depois adicionar
estas cidades na segunda?
Parece-me que assim teríamos uma maior objetividade, atacando o problema de
conectividade nas partes mais prioritárias, que
Eu acho que dá para fazer tudo junto. Para chegar em boa parte do Rio
Grande do Sul, não precisa passar por Porto Alegre. O inconveniente de
termos muitas cidades é que a tabela fica grande, mas acho que dá para
quebrar ela em partes. Já corrigi a rota entre Porto Alegre e
Florianópolis, mas o
Não tem muito o que fazer mesmo a não ser esperar os updates semanais
do banco de dados deles.
Eu dei uma corrigida na Dutra (entre Taubaté e Rio de Janeiro) neste sábado.
[]s
2009/12/7 Flavio Bello Fialho be...@cnpuv.embrapa.br:
Eu acho que dá para fazer tudo junto. Para chegar em boa parte
Java e Flash bloquiado, e nao poder instalar outro software como merkaartor,
eu so poder ver sistemas utalizando AJAX, e as vezes por um hora ou dois
entra no Potlatch (tem so um computador por 13 persoes que tem flash
instalado)
2009/12/7 Claudomiro Nascimento Junior claudom...@claudomiro.com
Estou rodando agora com todas as cidades. Aqui a conexão não é muito boa,
creio que vai demorar entre uma e duas horas.
2009/12/7 Flavio Bello Fialho be...@cnpuv.embrapa.br
Eu acho que dá para fazer tudo junto. Para chegar em boa parte do Rio
Grande do Sul, não precisa passar por Porto
1 - 100 di 262 matches
Mail list logo
