Eugene Alvin Villar wrote, On Thursday, 06 January, 2011 02:03 AM:
In Potlatch 2 and Merkaartor 0.17, the imagery can be moved by
pressing down the spacebar then dragging. I don't know how to do this
in JOSM but it also has a way to move the background image.
Brilliant. I didn't know you could
Hi Jim,
It is possible to do this on the latest JOSM. I was also surprised
(and very happy) to discover this powerful new feature on JOSM.
Because I used to manually enter 'numeric values' for offset
corrections (Northings/Eastings), and It's a long trial error
process to get the best-fit; now
Rally de Leon wrote, On Thursday, 06 January, 2011 12:04 PM:
the one i'm using on windows: JOSM (version 3767)
While Bing Imagery GPS traces are shown on the JOSM's background:
click on menu: Imagery -- New offset
Don't seem to have that menu anywhere. I'm using the latest JOSM on Linux.
JOSM Version 3767 (on Windows) looks like this:
http://s232.photobucket.com/albums/ee315/ralleon888/?action=viewcurrent=JOSMVersion3767ImageryOffset.jpg
No need for extra plug-in (it's built-in):
Hi,
On 01/05/11 09:01, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen wrote:
Is there a tool available to remove all my contributed data from osm,
safeguard it, and allows me to resubmit once I can agree
with the CT and new license ?
No. You would probably negatively affect a lot of other
Frederik Ramm frede...@... writes:
Nothing will be removed on 1st April. 1st April only means that you will
not be allowed to edit *with your old account* if you haven't agreed to
the CT.
Can you clarify this? I understood that the CTs were per-person, not
per-account, so if you are unable to
On 5 January 2011 12:09, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Frederik Ramm frede...@... writes:
Nothing will be removed on 1st April. 1st April only means that you will
not be allowed to edit *with your old account* if you haven't agreed to
the CT.
Can you clarify this? I understood that the
On 5 January 2011 22:15, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
Repeated again... per account. The 1.0 version of the CT terms are not
clear, but the intent is per account.
And here I was thinking that contracts are about what's in them... No
matter how much you'd wish and hope they'd
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 12:09:41 + (UTC), Ed Avis wrote:
Frederik Ramm frede...@... writes:
Nothing will be removed on 1st April. 1st April only means that you
will
not be allowed to edit *with your old account* if you haven't agreed
to
the CT.
Can you clarify this? I understood that the
Hi,
On 01/05/2011 01:17 PM, Ed Avis wrote:
If the new path for licence changes is well-thought-out and well-defined, why
are we not using it now?
I would love to, however if today 2/3 agree to the license change, we
still need to get an OK from the remaining 1/3 to continue using their
data
Grant Slater openstreet...@... writes:
I understood that the CTs were per-person, not
per-account, so if you are unable to agree to them for existing contributions
you would not be able to open a new account either (since to do so you'd have
to agree to the CTs for your earlier contributions
On 5 January 2011 22:21, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
CTs will allways be per account. There is nothing linking seperate accounts
together or even to an actual person. There is only an e-mail address.
Any one person can also create multiple accounts and choose to accept or not
accept
On 5 January 2011 04:13, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 January 2011 04:37, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
That is true. If OSMF wanted to release the data as PD, it would have to
delete any OS OpenData-derived content first.
I still don't understand how data
On 5 January 2011 22:28, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
Our mapping is (likely) illegal in North Korea and a few other
You have mentioned China, because mapping there is illegal without the
proper permits or whatever you need.
regions. I bet we would not remove the data even
John Smith wrote:
I still don't understand how data could be accepted on that basis
in the first place, either there has to be firm statements that such
data would be removed, not may be removed
As I said to Robert last night, I don't think you need to explicitly write
we will not do
Ed Avis wrote:
I think that actions speak louder than words
svn is that way
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-CTs-and-the-1-April-deadline-tp5887879p5891828.html
Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at
On 5 January 2011 22:41, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
As I said to Robert last night, I don't think you need to explicitly write
we will not do anything illegal into the Contributor Terms, whether the
illegal act is shooting Google executives or deliberately distributing
Frederik Ramm frede...@... writes:
If the new path for licence changes is well-thought-out and well-defined, why
are we not using it now?
I would love to, however if today 2/3 agree to the license change, we
still need to get an OK from the remaining 1/3 to continue using their
data
Right!
Frederic said as a reply:
No. You would probably negatively affect a lot of other contributions by
removing your data. This might be considered vandalism. If you were to
remove your data now, others would probably undo the removal.
These points are not relevant. Once OSM continues under new
On 05/01/11 13:14, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen wrote:
These points are not relevant. Once OSM continues under new license and CT
(as currently presented) I demand to have my owned data withdrawn.
Why?
- Rob.
___
legal-talk mailing
Maarten Deen md...@... writes:
CTs will allways be per account. There is nothing linking seperate
accounts together or even to an actual person. There is only an e-mail
address.
Any one person can also create multiple accounts and choose to accept
or not accept the CT for his
On 2011-01-05 14:14, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen wrote:
These points are not relevant. Once OSM continues under new license and CT
(as currently presented) I demand to have my owned data withdrawn.
Just out of curiosity: What do you consider as your data?
Bye, Andreas
Hi,
On 01/05/2011 02:14 PM, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
Nothing will be removed on 1st April. 1st April only means that you will
not be allowed to edit *with your old account* if you haven't agreed to
the CT.
No edit with my account leads to that I demand my previous data
John Smith wrote:
On 5 January 2011 22:41, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
As I said to Robert last night, I don't think you need to explicitly
write
we will not do anything illegal into the Contributor Terms
[...]
What's with the comparisons of contract law and criminal
Gert Gremmen wrote:
Free data needs no license or CT.
I agree! I'm really glad you - like me and many others - are dedicating your
data to the public domain. No licence, no CT.
Once OSM continues under new license and CT
(as currently presented) I demand to have my owned data withdrawn.
Oh,
You have a point. ;
But I wrote just my intention, not my decision.
But I can still remove whatever data I consider mine.
(well, until april 1st)
Gert Gremmen
-
Openstreetmap.nl (alias: cetest)
Before printing, think about the
On 5 January 2011 23:53, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Copyright infringement _is_ a criminal offence in England Wales; and the
CTs expressly state that the agreement between OSMF and the user shall be
governed by English law.
I was under the impression that only the US had
On 6 January 2011 00:29, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
I was under the impression that only the US had personal copyright
infringement as a criminal offence... This is generally given as a
reason that individuals aren't being sued outside the US for copying
music.
... being sued
John Smith wrote:
I was under the impression that only the US had personal copyright
infringement as a criminal offence...
It's an offence in EW whether personal or commercial. For a business, it's
an offence to distribute copyrighted material without licence; for an
individual, it's an
On 4 January 2011 23:33, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
That is true. If OSMF wanted to release the data as PD, it would have
to delete any OS OpenData-derived content first.
However, is there any guarantee that OSMF will remove such data
first?
To answer Robert's question. In my view clause 2 needs - and I hope
that it will include in its final version - a limitation that you only
grant a licence in respect of any rights that you have.
The aim (I believe) is this:
* the contributor licenses very broadly OSMF to permit them to use any
On 5 January 2011 13:24, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
On 01/05/2011 01:17 PM, Ed Avis wrote:
If the new path for licence changes is well-thought-out and well-defined,
why
are we not using it now?
I would love to, however if today 2/3 agree to the license change, we still
I am wondering if anyone have considered the laws of some countries, at
least Sweden, that states that maps and other forms of landscape
information should be reviewed before published. This of defense
considerations. Probably there is some limitation of the jurisdiction
that makes Swedish laws
I have provisionally added Francis' suggested wording but would like to run it
by other License Working Group members. It may help NearMap and similar
situations.
Here is the CT version that we are looking at formally releasing:
Mike,
I have provisionally added Francis' suggested wording but would like
to run it by other License Working Group members. It may help NearMap
and similar situations.
The major change in all this, compared to the earlier versions, is the
concept that you may now contribute data that is not
Frederik Ramm frede...@... writes:
Could someone, of that disposition, let's call him A, not simply do the
following: Make a contract with person B that says Dear B, you may use
my data but only under ODBL 1.0 and nothing else; then instruct B to
upload the stuff to OSM. Now the data is in
On 6 January 2011 10:11, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
This would not be better at all, it would render the whole idea of
relicensing via Contributor Terms pointless.
This aregument you keep stating about people thinking the data is
owned by people isn't the full store, in fact I
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.netalan_mintz%2b...@earthlink.net
wrote:
highway=*_link implies oneway=yes
junction=roundabout implies oneway=yes
no layer tag implies layer=0
no turn restriction at an intersection implies traffic can flow between the
ways
Hi,
(replying to my own message which was in reply to Dave F Anthony)
On 01/04/11 15:17, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Second, there is neither a technical possibility to delete posts from
a mailing list, nor do we have any moderation policy in place. If we had
any moderation - something I always
-If you look at Android from the view point of the end user or the
hacker, it's quite closed. DRM, binary drivers, and the mobile
operators occasionally blocking tethering applications.
However, independent application developers with valid business models
love Android. Their applications aren't
At 2011-01-05 01:48, Pieren wrote:
no highway=traffic_signals implies
no traffic signals
I would argue that this is wrong for the vast majority of existing data.
Traffic signals are present only where people have placed them, while
there are millions of intersections that are the result of
2011/1/5 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 6:08 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with Nic. AFAIK there are no defaults in OSM, not UK ones, and
not others. Any not given Information is simply not yet entered.
Are you not aware of this:
2011/1/5 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
You cannot write not given Information is simply not yet entered
no?
not given Information is simply not yet entered
oops, I did it again
cheers,
Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 5:39 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.comwrote:
not given Information is simply not yet entered
oops, I did it again
No problem ;-) You can write it 100 times, it does not make it the truth...
Pieren
___
talk
Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
Clause 2 requires contributors to make a large grant of IP rights
to OSMF on any content added to OSM. I believe that the intent
here is actually that you only grant OSMF the rights necessary
for them to act as described in clauses 3 and 4.
Agreed.
Lets now
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Nick Whitelegg
nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk wrote:
-If you look at Android from the view point of the end user or the
hacker, it's quite closed. DRM, binary drivers, and the mobile
operators occasionally blocking tethering applications.
However, independent
Results from my crude little survey;
count percentage
Android of some kind70 30%
Nokia 65 28%
iPhone 39 17%
Other 45 19%
very funny
On Jan 4, 2011, at 7:11 AM, Rob Myers wrote:
On 04/01/11 15:05, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
I will currently be one of the people locked out because I have used
the Ordnance Survey open data which is apparently incompatible with
the new license.
OS OpenData
SteveC wrote:
In response to the critique of the validity, feel free to go do a better job. I
was just curious.
One thing that it does not show is what OS is being used. 'nokia' covers several
options, and I'm finding my N900 is actually quite a nice linux computer ...
--
Lester Caine -
Dat is inderdaad lastig, zeker als er boven de garage ook nog eens
winkels/huizen/paden/wegen te vinden zijn. En al helemaal als daar
were boven ook nog... achja.
Jouw tags kloppen op zich wel, maar het is bijna onmogelijk om zoiets
goed te renderen.
In Almere hebben we ook zoiets (3 lagen), De
Dit is een principieel probleem met 2D of 2.5D
kaarten/databases.
Ik denk dat OSM -als het de licentietroubles overleeft-
wel een betere support voor 3D kan gebruiken en zal krijgen.
Gert
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: talk-nl-boun...@openstreetmap.org
Zoals beloofd!
Volgende week zondag 16 januari is er een nieuwjaarsborrel in Hilversum.
Deel je plannen voor 2011 met al je map lotgenoten onder het genot van een
drankje.
The place to be:
Cafe Dudok
Larenseweg 1a
1221 CH Hilversum
52.2274, 5.1821
We beginnen om 14.00 en zien wel hoe laat het
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 14:35:06 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Flooding has disrupted mail deliveries in Queensland.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/01/05/3106734.htm
I guess it might be useful after all to tag flood prone roads:
On 5 January 2011 18:20, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
so you just download Qld and tag the lot??
Heh, seems that way, the vacant lot near by has been a nesting ground
for ducks and they go for swims in the puddles that don't seem to want
to dry up.
John,
Would it not be better to map the extent of the flood plain rather than tag
individual road segments? I know they have mapped the 'floodplain' across
Victoria and then categorised it into probabilities ie 1:5, 1:10, 1:20, 1:50
and 1:100 chance of flood. Obviously its another thing getting
On 6 January 2011 07:10, Craig Feuerherdt craigfeuerhe...@gmail.com wrote:
John,
Would it not be better to map the extent of the flood plain rather than tag
individual road segments? I know they have mapped the 'floodplain' across
Victoria and then categorised it into probabilities ie 1:5,
On 6 January 2011 11:07, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/01/2011 2:48 AM, John Smith wrote:
+1
Most people most of the time don't tend to care to much for/about the
ABS boundaries, I was doing a fair bit of work importing postcodes
previously, however it might be better to
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Craig Feuerherdt craigfeuerhe...@gmail.com
wrote:
Would it not be better to map the extent of the flood plain rather than tag
individual road segments?
But within a flood plain, some roads may be prone to flooding while others
may be protected (e.g. raised,
On 6 January 2011 16:40, waldo000...@gmail.com waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Craig Feuerherdt
craigfeuerhe...@gmail.com wrote:
Would it not be better to map the extent of the flood plain rather than
tag individual road segments?
But within a flood plain, some
Acho que você pode usar a tag is_in. Mas se você tiver os limites dos
bairros e conjuntos residenciais mapeados, isso não é necessário. O
Nominatim já vai saber que a rua está dentro do bairro. Se tiver só os POIs,
então é bom colocar as tags, pois eu acho que o Nominatim vai usá-las para
não usar
Os dados que tenho aqui possuem até os postes de energia elétrica da
concessionária. rs...
Bom, como eu tenho os dados dos bairros também (limites/boundaries) vou
deixar as vias sem divisão. Depois trato os bairros.
Aproveitando a conversa, pergunto: mês passado passei alguns dias no Ceará
de
A precisão do endereço depende da precisão da numeração na base. Existe
essa informação de numeração nos dados a serem importados?
[]s
2011/1/5 Flávio Henrique yoshi...@gmail.com
Os dados que tenho aqui possuem até os postes de energia elétrica da
concessionária. rs...
Bom, como eu tenho os
2011/1/5 Claudomiro Nascimento Junior claudom...@claudomiro.com
A precisão do endereço depende da precisão da numeração na base. Existe
essa informação de numeração nos dados a serem importados?
[]s
Você quer dizer o número da quadra e lote? Sim.
Número na rua (como km em rodovias) não.
2011/1/5 Bráulio brauliobeze...@gmail.com
Acho que você pode usar a tag is_in. Mas se você tiver os limites dos
bairros e conjuntos residenciais mapeados, isso não é necessário. O
Nominatim já vai saber que a rua está dentro do bairro. Se tiver só os POIs,
então é bom colocar as tags, pois eu
Bráulio e demais, boa noite!
Abaixo está o link para os limites dos bairros de Goiânia. Por gentileza,
verifiquem se estou no caminho certo. Se falta algo. Se algo está errado. O
que for.
Bráulio, é isso que você chamou de 'limite dos bairros' abaixo? É isso que
vai ajudar no mapeamento de um
2011/1/5 Flávio Henrique yoshi...@gmail.com
Eu notei que depois de importar, tratar os dados e rodar o plugin
Validation (JOSM), percebi que 8 bairros ficaram como 'untagged ways'.
Parece que a role 'outer' desses bairros ficaram sem nome. Não entendi a
razão, nem como resolver isso. Peço,
Am 05.01.2011 02:44, schrieb fla...@googlemail.com:
Es wäre optimal, wenn sich ein AiO-Styleverantwortlicher finden könnte.
Vorraussetzungen wären mkgmapstyle- und typfiles bearbeiten zu können. Schön
wäre noch mit git klarzukommen (ich weiß das ist erstmal ne Hürde, aber man
kommt rein -
Am 05.01.2011 08:03, schrieb André Joost:
Am 05.01.11 00:12, schrieb Dieter Jasper:
Hallo,
habe beim Arbeiten mit JOSM 2x eine Fehlermeldung bekommen (siehe auch
Ticket 5811).
Vielleicht ist es ja auch kein Fehler des Editors.
Vermutlich. Wäre wichtig zu wissen, welche Daten du eingelesen
Am 05.01.11 10:01, schrieb Dieter Jasper:
Am 05.01.2011 08:03, schrieb André Joost:
Am 05.01.11 00:12, schrieb Dieter Jasper:
Hallo,
habe beim Arbeiten mit JOSM 2x eine Fehlermeldung bekommen (siehe auch
Ticket 5811).
Vielleicht ist es ja auch kein Fehler des Editors.
Vermutlich. Wäre
Am 5. Januar 2011 08:51 schrieb Bernd Wurst be...@bwurst.org:
Am Dienstag 04 Januar 2011, 19:23:55 schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
und jetzt? Wollen wir jetzt gemeinsam über ein Gebiet spekulieren, von
dem wir beide keine Ahnung haben? Gerade Tracks sind in manchen
Gegenden ohne vor Ort zu sein
Hallo,
ich bekomme nur noch error loading Bing attribution data in josm für die
bing-Bilder. Die normale Bing-Karte in Firefox läuft aber.
Wird irgendwo geschraubt, oder wars das?
Gruß, Wolfgang
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Hallo,
Am Mittwoch 05 Januar 2011 10:58:37 schrieb Wolfgang:
Hallo,
ich bekomme nur noch error loading Bing attribution data in josm für die
bing-Bilder. Die normale Bing-Karte in Firefox läuft aber.
Wird irgendwo geschraubt, oder wars das?
Kommando zurück, scheint wieder zu gehen.
Am Mittwoch 05 Januar 2011, um 10:58:37 schrieb Wolfgang:
Hallo,
ich bekomme nur noch error loading Bing attribution data in josm für die
bing-Bilder. Die normale Bing-Karte in Firefox läuft aber.
Bei mir sind sie drin. JOSM 3772. Die Bilddienst-URL ist bing:bing
MfG, Chris...
Hallo Nop,
danke, bin nun anscheinend fündig geworden. Bin dabei über den
Menuepunkt Verzeichnisse - Wanderwege gegangen. Allerdings hat es mich
etwas verwundert, dass dort dann ein Gesamtverzeichnis aller Wanderwege
aufgebaut wird, auch wenn ich mich z.B. nur für jene in Rheinland-Pfalz
Am Mittwoch 05 Januar 2011, 10:46:46 schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
Komisch finde ich bei diesem Gedanken nur, dass
man gleichzeitig der cloud nicht zutraut, aus den Roads nach Begehung
Straßen zu machen.
Der gemeine Navi-Nutzer (und das ist ofenbar der einzige der manche
gottverlassenen
Am Mittwoch 05 Januar 2011, 10:46:46 schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
ich meinte auch nicht die Erschließungsstraßen (zu denen habe ich Dir
eine gated community in Deutschland gepostet, wo der Zugang selbst für
Fußgänger ohne Berechtigung nicht frei ist).
Auf dem betreffenden Luftbild habe ich
Am 05.01.2011 10:19, schrieb André Joost:
Hast du den Weg in der josm-Sitzung neu angelegt, mit josm die Daten auf
dem üblichen Weg per Rechteckauswahl heruntergeladen, oder aus einem
Extrakt? Bei letzteren kann es schon mal solche Probleme geben, wenn
Knoten eines Weges fehlen.
Über die
Hallo,
Am 05.01.2011 08:11, schrieb André Joost:
Am 04.01.11 23:25, schrieb Sven Geggus:
Was anderes ist mir noch aufgefallen. Warum wird dennd er GR20 auf
korsika nicht gerendert?
Der schlummert noch in der Warteliste:
Nur am Rande und off-topic:
Nach Auffassung der FFRP (Fédération
Am 5. Januar 2011 02:34 schrieb Tirkon tirko...@yahoo.de:
Bis dahin würde ich zum trunk plus motorroad=yes tendieren, weil die
sonstige Beschilderung und auch das Ausfahrtschild gelb ist.
ja, am Anfang der Serie würde ich auch trunk und motorroad taggen, ist
ja auch so beschildert:
Am 05.01.11 11:32, schrieb Rainer Kluge:
Nur am Rande und off-topic:
Nach Auffassung der FFRP (Fédération française de randonnée pedestre)
sind die GR-Wegen deren geistiges Eigentum und diese dürfen daher nicht
in OSM erfasst werden. Auf Anfragen der französischen OSM-Community hat
die FFRP
hike39 ho...@hike.de wrote:
Allerdings hat es mich etwas verwundert, dass dort dann ein
Gesamtverzeichnis aller Wanderwege aufgebaut wird, auch wenn ich
mich z.B. nur für jene in Rheinland-Pfalz interessiere.
Das liegt vermutlich daran, dass Nop einfach alle Wanderwege die er
hat automatisch
André Joost andre+jo...@nurfuerspam.de wrote:
a) fehlendem Ortsbezug im Namen
GR20 alleine wird nicht toleriert.
Aus dem GR ergibt sich implizit, dass der Weg in Frankreich oder
Spanien liegt. Explizit ergibt sich der Ortsbezug durch die Geometrie
selbst. Komische Regel, das.
Gruss
Sven
--
Rainer Kluge rklug...@web.de wrote:
Das bezieht sich natürlich nicht auf die Wege selbst, sondern auf die
Verwendung
der Bezeichnung GR xx und das Zusammenfassen von Wegen zu einer Relation. Die
Relation 101692 steht ganz eindeutig im Widerspruch zur Auffassung der FFRP.
Ich kann den
Hallo Sven,
Am 05.01.2011 12:58, schrieb Sven Geggus:
Wenn es ein eingetragenes Markenzeichen für die Namen gibt dürfen wir
die Bezeichnung GR XX tatsächlich nicht verwenden aber eben nur dann.
Ich kein Jurist aber meine Französischkenntnisse reichen aus um das zu
verstehen:
Topo-guide des
Am 05.01.11 12:49, schrieb Sven Geggus:
André Joostandre+jo...@nurfuerspam.de wrote:
a) fehlendem Ortsbezug im Namen
GR20 alleine wird nicht toleriert.
Aus dem GR ergibt sich implizit, dass der Weg in Frankreich oder
Spanien liegt.
... oder Belgien.
Nop möchte aber für sein
Hallo Michael,
Die drei Plugins WMSPlugin, Imagery RemoteControl sind nun direkt in
JOSM eingebaut, und müssen nicht mehr nachträglich nachinstalliert werden.
Ok - aber wo?
JOSM auf rev. 3772 aktualisiert.
danach war auch das WMS-Menü verschwunden
bei mir ist trotzdem das Imagery-Menü
Sven Geggus wrote:
a) fehlendem Ortsbezug im Namen
GR20 alleine wird nicht toleriert.
Aus dem GR ergibt sich implizit, dass der Weg in Frankreich oder
Spanien liegt. Explizit ergibt sich der Ortsbezug durch die Geometrie
selbst. Komische Regel, das.
Der Name sollte für sich allein
Hallo!
hike39 wrote:
danke, bin nun anscheinend fündig geworden. Bin dabei über den
Menuepunkt Verzeichnisse - Wanderwege gegangen. Allerdings hat es mich
etwas verwundert, dass dort dann ein Gesamtverzeichnis aller Wanderwege
aufgebaut wird, auch wenn ich mich z.B. nur für jene in
Hi!
Sven Geggus wrote:
Das liegt vermutlich daran, dass Nop einfach alle Wanderwege die er
hat automatisch extrahiert und keine Ahnung hat wo genau die liegen.
Genau. :-)
Sven Geggus wrote:
@Nop: Das kann man ganz einfach ST_Intersects in der Postgis machen,
wenn man
Rainer Kluge rklug...@web.de wrote:
Demnach sind die Bezeichnungen für die diversen Wege, die zugehörigen
Abkürzungen und die Farbcodes der Markierung eingetragene Markenzeichen.
Unglaublich!
Das schlimmste was passieren kann ist aber, dass wir die Wege
umbenennen müssen.
Gruss
Sven
--
C
NopMap ekkeh...@gmx.de wrote:
GR sagt ohne weitere Informationen exakt gar nichts.
GR ist ein Trademark wie ich gerade gelernt habe.
Außerdem gibt es das Grundprinzip, das bei Namen keine Abkürzungen verwendet
werden. GR ist nach meinem Verständnis eine Ref, aber kein Name.
Das kann man so
Am 3. Januar 2011 12:22 schrieb Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Mein dringender Rat in dieser Sache waere, jegliches Tagging, das ueber
place_of_worship=church, building=yes, name=xyz und
religion=christian hinausgeht, der oertlichen Gemeinde zu
ueberlassen...
Ich kann niemandem was
Am 5. Januar 2011 08:48 schrieb Bernd Wurst be...@bwurst.org:
highway=road kann jegliche Art von Weg oder Straße sein. Das sollte man aus
gutem Grund nicht für's Routing benutzen.
nämlich? Es ist natürlich ein gewisses Risiko damit verbunden, wenn
man es optional einschaltet ist man sich
Am Mittwoch 05 Januar 2011, um 03:06:47 schrieb Markus:
Seit der Aktualisierung von JOSM-tested auf 3751
ist das WMS-Plugin im Menü verschwunden (sei jetzt im Core?).
Auch das imagery-Plugin ist weg, aber noch in der Plugin-Liste.
Worum geht's denn, was fehlt Dir?
MfG, Chris
Am Mittwoch 05 Januar 2011, 12:58:55 schrieb Sven Geggus:
Wenn es ein eingetragenes Markenzeichen für die Namen gibt dürfen wir
die Bezeichnung GR XX tatsächlich nicht verwenden aber eben nur dann.
Meinem laienhaften Verständnis nach darf man für eine neutrale Kennzeichnung
einer Marke auch
Markus schrieb:
Die drei Plugins WMSPlugin, Imagery RemoteControl sind nun direkt in
JOSM eingebaut, und müssen nicht mehr nachträglich nachinstalliert
werden.
Ok - aber wo?
Die Funktionen von WMSPlugin, Imagery RemoteControl sind nun direkt in
der josm-tested.jar integriert. Deswegen ist
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Markus liste12a4...@gmx.de wrote:
Seit der Aktualisierung von JOSM-tested auf 3751
ist das WMS-Plugin im Menü verschwunden (sei jetzt im Core?).
Auch das imagery-Plugin ist weg, aber noch in der Plugin-Liste.
Hast du zufällig jetzt einen Menüpunkt
Am 05.01.2011 13:56, Markus:
Hallo Michael,
Die drei Plugins WMSPlugin, Imagery RemoteControl sind nun direkt in
JOSM eingebaut, und müssen nicht mehr nachträglich nachinstalliert
werden.
Ok - aber wo?
Einstellungen öffnen um dort RemoteControl-Einstellungen zu überprüfen
+ in der
Am 5. Januar 2011 12:58 schrieb Sven Geggus li...@fuchsschwanzdomain.de:
Außerdem wäre nach dieser merkwürdigen Rechtsauffassung auch die
Wikipediaseite http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/GR20 illegal.
ich kenne mich nicht besonders aus mit Markenrechten, aber das hier
ist doch auch nicht verboten,
Hallo Michael.
Bin jetzt mit meinem Ersten durchgang durch die gesamte Liste durch ;)
Ein paar Verbesserungsvorschläge hab ich noch...
1) Weg-Typ:
Bisher muss man jedes Element anklicken, um herauszukriegen, was das
jetzt für ein Objekt ist.
Häufig ist der Weg-Typ dabei aber Aussage genug: an
1 - 100 di 222 matches
Mail list logo
