[Talk-TW] [RFC] 提案中文名稱標籤方式, Multilingual names

2016-03-26 Per discussione Rex Tsai
提案: https://osmtw.hackpad.com/RFC-Multilingual-names-ngewyizFYzN 好讀表格: https://goo.gl/TpumXK 目前多國語系的 name 標籤 (tag),社群偏好使用 alpha-2 code of ISO 639-1,因此全世界中文用戶使用 name:zh。但由於中文用戶包含簡體與繁體兩種字體編碼,以及對於國際地名翻譯不同,很容易因為共用標籤 key 產生衝突。例如 Everest 在台灣使用者偏好使用「聖母峰」、而中國使用「珠穆朗玛峰」。 -

Re: [Talk-cz] Kde má být adresa?

2016-03-26 Per discussione Matěj Cepl
On 2016-03-26, 10:57 GMT, Karel Volný wrote: > osobně považuju za nejlepší mít to na vchodu, popř. na budově, > není-li pozice vchodu známa nebo více vchodů má stejnou adresu Už jsem upravil a dal jsem jim na sloupek u vrátnice. Pokud se se mnou někdo bude chtít hádat, tak může. Matěj --

Re: [OSM-talk] Slack

2016-03-26 Per discussione Steve Coast
I’d love to. I have been looking and found the basic xmpp gateway, I’d appreciate help if you’re interested? I also love what tmcw did with the bot too. Best Steve > On Mar 26, 2016, at 5:14 PM, Toby Murray wrote: > > I believe there are slack bots that can connect

Re: [OSM-talk] Slack

2016-03-26 Per discussione Toby Murray
I believe there are slack bots that can connect slack and IRC. Not sure how well they work when there is a lot of traffic on both sides. But is it something we would want to look at? Toby On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Steve Coast wrote: > Thanks I added it to the wiki. >

Re: [Talk-us] Caliparks re-tagging paths?

2016-03-26 Per discussione Greg Troxel
Kevin Kenny writes: > This isn't a matter of "get off my lawn." It's a matter of "there's no > promise that there's a path there at all." I think you're making a separate argument, that when there's some maybe-path that's indistinct, and not clearly followable, then

Re: [OSM-talk] Slack

2016-03-26 Per discussione Steve Coast
Thanks I added it to the wiki. Steve > On Mar 26, 2016, at 2:07 PM, althio wrote: > > Created a few days ago for SotM-WG: > https://osmfoundation.slack.com/ > - althio > On mobile, please excuse brevity. > > On Mar 26, 2016 9:05 PM,

Re: [OSM-talk] Slack

2016-03-26 Per discussione Dave F
Yeay! Another communication forum. Just what OSM needs. On 26/03/2016 19:59, Steve Coast wrote: Ok so look, Slack took over the world. And it turns out it’s pretty good and useful. Let’s have an official OSM slack. — Due Diligence: https://www.google.com/#q=slack+site:wiki.openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-us] Slack

2016-03-26 Per discussione Rihards
On 2016.03.26. 21:59, Steve Coast wrote: Ok so look, Slack took over the world. And it turns out it’s pretty good and useful. Let’s have an official OSM slack. ... I realize that I’m inviting a discussion about how slack is an evil company or that we should all just use IRC, and those are fine

Re: [OSM-talk] Slack

2016-03-26 Per discussione Nicolás Alvarez
2016-03-26 16:59 GMT-03:00 Steve Coast : > Ok so look, Slack took over the world. It may have taken over the internal-corporate-communication world maybe. Slack has a million active users, Telegram gets 350.000 new users every day. Telegram took over the world more than Slack

Re: [OSM-talk] Slack

2016-03-26 Per discussione althio
Created a few days ago for SotM-WG: https://osmfoundation.slack.com/ - althio On mobile, please excuse brevity. On Mar 26, 2016 9:05 PM, "Steve Coast" wrote: > Ok so look, Slack took over the world. And it turns out it’s pretty good > and useful. Let’s have an official OSM

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Slack

2016-03-26 Per discussione Ian Dees
Hi Steve and list members, OSM US already set up a Slack that has a few dozen people on it. Originally the board used it solely for internal communications but now there are plenty of folks hanging out talking about OSM in general (not just OSM US). One particular nicety of our Slack team is that

Re: [Talk-us] Slack

2016-03-26 Per discussione Ian Dees
Hi Steve and list members, OSM US already set up a Slack that has a few dozen people on it. Originally the board used it solely for internal communications but now there are plenty of folks hanging out talking about OSM in general (not just OSM US). One particular nicety of our Slack team is that

Re: [Talk-us] mapRe: (Second attempt) Potential data source: Adirondack Park Freshwater Wetlands

2016-03-26 Per discussione Adam Franco
Kevin, as a Vermont resident who is planning several canoe and hiking trips to the Adirondacks (with data collection for OSM), I look forward to having this import as context. Especially when exploring the Saint Regis canoe wilderness, which has a few lakes in OSM, but is otherwise pretty devoid

[OSM-talk] Slack

2016-03-26 Per discussione Steve Coast
Ok so look, Slack took over the world. And it turns out it’s pretty good and useful. Let’s have an official OSM slack. — Due Diligence: https://www.google.com/#q=slack+site:wiki.openstreetmap.org

[Talk-us] Slack

2016-03-26 Per discussione Steve Coast
Ok so look, Slack took over the world. And it turns out it’s pretty good and useful. Let’s have an official OSM slack. — Due Diligence: https://www.google.com/#q=slack+site:wiki.openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk-be] oorlogsmonument

2016-03-26 Per discussione Marc Gemis
nog wat varianten in taginfo 8 x historic=memorial ; memorial=tank [1] "This is used in conjunction with historic=memorial to specify which kind of memorial it is." [3] 2x historic=memorial; memorial:type=tank [2] "Use this tag in conjunction with historic=memorial to indicate the construction

Re: [OSM-talk-be] oorlogsmonument

2016-03-26 Per discussione Marc Gemis
volgens taginfo [1] zijn er 73 historic=tank objecten. [1] http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/historic=tank 2016-03-26 12:11 GMT+01:00 Bart Vanherck : > Bij ons in Geel staat sinds kort een legertank aan aan speelbos. > > Hoe kan ik dit het beste taggen? Ik vind zo

[Talk-it] Fwd: [wikimedia-it] Presentazioni Wikimania

2016-03-26 Per discussione Simone Cortesi
Ciao, Ginevra ci ricorda che è ancora possibile proporre contenuti per la prossima edizione di Wikimania. Ci saranno spazi dedicati ad OpenStreetMap... -- Forwarded message -- From: Ginevra Date: 2016-03-26 13:18 GMT+01:00 Subject: [wikimedia-it]

[OSM-talk-fr] Mapathon Missing Maps Paris - avril 2016

2016-03-26 Per discussione althio
Mapathon Missing Maps Paris - 07/04/2016 - Mozilla Jeudi 7 avril 2016 de 19:00 à 22:00 Paris, France Au programme : 19h : accueil des participants 19h15 : présentation d'OpenStreetMap et de la cartographie participative 19h30-22h : cartographions ! Mozilla France nous accueille gracieusement

Re: [Talk-cz] Galerie predevsim ceskych prikladu vyuziti OSM a vyzva k zaslani/oznameni dalsich prikladu vyuziti OSM

2016-03-26 Per discussione Pavel Bokr
Ahoj, diky moc za dalsi tipy! vcera jsem pridal jsem ty fotky tistenych map (trochu jsem je upravil), z maposmaticu by se dala ta sama mapa znovu vygenerovat ale nebezi jim DB. Bednu delali Mapnikem viz: http://www.bedna.org/2011/forum/mapa Na ten seznam sluzeb

[Talk-cat] Actualització del render

2016-03-26 Per discussione josep constantí
Hola, No s'ha de fer gaire cas del render quan a la rapidesa que reflecteix en mode consulta els canvis fets en mode edició: en general quan major és l'escala més triga en actualitzar-se. Si es fan petits canvis (a una escala petita) i es refresca sovint el navegador, normalment en pocs segons ja

Re: [Talk-us] Caliparks re-tagging paths?

2016-03-26 Per discussione ajt1...@gmail.com
On 26/03/2016 15:26, Kevin Kenny wrote: In these areas, a trail is a fairly tenuous thing. The marking may be just a splash of paint or an axe cut on a tree, and even that may be limited to once every few hundred metres. "A splash of paint every few hundred metres? You were lucky"*

Re: [Talk-cat] Dubtes sobre revisió carrers i representació d'edificacions urbanes

2016-03-26 Per discussione Esther Mingot
Hola! gràcies per la benviguda i les vostres indicacions. El llistat de poblacions que havia consultat era a una altre pàgina: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Catalan/Revisi%C3%B3_Carrers_Catalunya. El municipi que estic revisant és Vilamalla, em falta afegir uns passatges que

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Boston, MA, USA addr:housenumber Import

2016-03-26 Per discussione Roman Yepishev
Hi all, Just an update on the current status. 1. I am waiting for a response from Boston GIS regarding the license terms (MassGIS != Boston GIS, as I recently realized). 2. At this point the code will only be minimally tweaked as I have implemented everything I originally planned:  - Standalone

Re: [Talk-GB] Open data (Was: Parliamentary debate mentions OSM)

2016-03-26 Per discussione Brian Prangle
and make sure that on-the-ground changes get into OSM much faster than anyone else - ideally on the day of the change ;-) Brian On 26 March 2016 at 12:06, Andrew Hain wrote: > John Aldridge writes: > > > > By ensuring that OSM data is of higher quality,

Re: [Talk-us] mapRe: (Second attempt) Potential data source: Adirondack Park Freshwater Wetlands

2016-03-26 Per discussione Kevin Kenny
On 03/26/2016 02:06 AM, Russ Nelson wrote: Frederik Ramm writes: > I have zero knowledge about the Adirondack[s] I live here. Imagine a park half the size of Austria, with about 130K people living in it, and 200K people visiting it. Give about 30K of those people Internet access. Oh, and

Re: [OSM-talk-be] oorlogsmonument

2016-03-26 Per discussione Glenn Plas
Try variations. http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ffU On 26-03-16 11:29, Karel Adams wrote: > Kijkende naar de IJzertoren (het eerste voorbeeld dat me inviel) zie ik > heritageyes > historicmemorial >

[talk-au] Question from OSM Forum: Australia Locations Questions

2016-03-26 Per discussione Nev Wedding
Hi as the Australian section of the OSM forum is a bit quiet, I thought the question Justin asked may be of interest here too. Please reply to Justin on the OSM forum http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=54135 ___ Talk-au mailing list

[Talk-at] geoimage-Layer nicht mehr in JOSM

2016-03-26 Per discussione Johannes Silly
Hallo Wolfgang, Hallo Liste, Also bei mir geht "geoimage.at max res" Heute wieder (ohne irgendwelches zutun meinerseits) ohne Probleme bis jetzt. Danke fürs wieder einbinden! LG Johannes >@nebulon42: > >Danke für den Hinweis, habe geoimage wieder eingetragen und wird also >hoffentlich bald wieder

Re: [Talk-de] admin_level 8 entfernen

2016-03-26 Per discussione Florian Lohoff
Hola, On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 08:27:14AM +0100, Dietmar wrote: > Hallo Florian, hallo Tobias, hallo Liste, > > die Grenzen sind ein Sonderfall, das wissen wir alle. Es gibt vor Ort > fast keine Markierungen, die ein OSM-ler finden kann, um Grenzen zu > verifizieren, daher müssen wir dem Import

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] La Poste et la géolocalisation

2016-03-26 Per discussione Christian Rogel
> > > Le 25 mars 2016 à 20:12, Christian Rogel > a écrit : > Lu dans Ouest-France du 23-03-16 : > " Tregarvan, commune de 146 habitants... est en zone blanche. La Poste et > les secours, … disposent seulement de

Re: [Talk-it] OSMIT 2016 + inaugurazione sede

2016-03-26 Per discussione Dario Crespi
Eccolo: http://wiki.wikimedia.it/wiki/Diario_di_bordo#maggio_2016 Ho linkato alla pagina sul wiki di OSM. Dario Il giorno 26 marzo 2016 12:25, Cristian Consonni ha scritto: > Il 26/Mar/2016 11:13, "Dario Crespi" ha scritto: > > credo che OSMit

Re: [Talk-GB] Open data (Was: Parliamentary debate mentions OSM)

2016-03-26 Per discussione Andrew Hain
John Aldridge writes: > By ensuring that OSM data is of higher quality, or contains useful > information still absent from those other sources. If we can't or don't > do that, OSM (in the UK) will cease to have a purpose, and can be left > to wither un-mourned. Plus, usefully be

Re: [OSM-talk] WeeklyOSM 296

2016-03-26 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Am 26.03.2016 um 12:19 schrieb Jinal Foflia : > > Our thoughts and sympathy are with the families and friends of the victims of > the Berlin attack. https://mobile.twitter.com/CanadianGIS/status/687457967604645888/photo/1 ;-)

Re: [Talk-ca] WeeklyOSM 296

2016-03-26 Per discussione Jinal Foflia
Apologies for the typing mistake it is "Brussels attack" and not "Berlin attack". - Our thoughts and sympathy are with the families and friends of the victims of the 'Brussels' attack. SotM organizing committee is safe. SotM will happen as planned and are monitoring the situation

Re: [Talk-in] WeeklyOSM 296

2016-03-26 Per discussione Jinal Foflia
Apologies for the typing mistake it is "Brussels attack" and not "Berlin attack". - Our thoughts and sympathy are with the families and friends of the victims of the 'Brussels' attack. SotM organizing committee is safe. SotM will happen as planned and are monitoring the situation

Re: [Talk-GB] WeeklyOSM 296

2016-03-26 Per discussione Jinal Foflia
Apologies for the typing mistake it is "Brussels attack" and not "Berlin attack". - Our thoughts and sympathy are with the families and friends of the victims of the 'Brussels' attack. SotM organizing committee is safe. SotM will happen as planned and are monitoring the situation

Re: [Talk-us] WeeklyOSM 296

2016-03-26 Per discussione Jinal Foflia
Apologies for the typing mistake it is "Brussels attack" and not "Berlin attack". - Our thoughts and sympathy are with the families and friends of the victims of the 'Brussels' attack. SotM organizing committee is safe. SotM will happen as planned and are monitoring the situation

Re: [OSM-talk] WeeklyOSM 296

2016-03-26 Per discussione Jinal Foflia
Apologies for the typing mistake it is "Brussels attack" and not "Berlin attack". - Our thoughts and sympathy are with the families and friends of the victims of the 'Brussels' attack. SotM organizing committee is safe. SotM will happen as planned and are monitoring the situation

Re: [OSM-talk-be] oorlogsmonument

2016-03-26 Per discussione Karel Adams
Kijkende naar de IJzertoren (het eerste voorbeeld dat me inviel) zie ik heritageyes historicmemorial memorialwar_memorial De Leeuw van Waterlo heeft enkel historicmemorial Het beste voorbeeld leek me de Cromwell tank in 'tStad (grijns) maar die lijkt helemaal niet te zijn

Re: [Talk-cz] Mapování pro renderer

2016-03-26 Per discussione Pavel Machek
On Fri 2016-03-25 18:12:49, Mikoláš Štrajt wrote: > Jak řešit situace, kdy si to vyloženě říká o "mapování pro renderer"? > > Příklad ze života: > > mám mapový styl, který při oddálení zobrazuje šedou barvo landuse= > residential. To funguje celkem pěkně na většinu vesnic ale ne tak v Praze. V >

Re: [Talk-it] OSMIT 2016 + inaugurazione sede

2016-03-26 Per discussione Cristian Consonni
Il 26/Mar/2016 11:13, "Dario Crespi" ha scritto: > credo che OSMit andrebbe messo anche sul Diario di bordo di Wikimedia Italia: http://wiki.wikimedia.it/wiki/Diario_di_bordo Be bold, Dario. C ___ Talk-it mailing list

[OSM-talk] WeeklyOSM 296

2016-03-26 Per discussione Jinal Foflia
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue #296, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the OpenStreetMap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/archives/7155 *Among others:* - Our thoughts and sympathy are with the families and friends of the

[Talk-us] WeeklyOSM 296

2016-03-26 Per discussione Jinal Foflia
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue #296, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the OpenStreetMap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/archives/7155 *Among others:* - Our thoughts and sympathy are with the families and friends of the

Re: [OSM-talk-be] oorlogsmonument

2016-03-26 Per discussione Glenn Plas
In Bastogne staat een M4, http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2118551248 McAuliffe plein. en in Wibrin http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3678713981 Glenn On 26-03-16 11:11, Bart Vanherck wrote: > Bij ons in Geel staat sinds kort een legertank aan aan speelbos. > > Hoe kan ik dit het beste

[Talk-GB] WeeklyOSM 296

2016-03-26 Per discussione Jinal Foflia
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue #296, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the OpenStreetMap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/archives/7155 *Among others:* - Our thoughts and sympathy are with the families and friends of the

[Talk-ca] WeeklyOSM 296

2016-03-26 Per discussione Jinal Foflia
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue #296, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the OpenStreetMap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/archives/7155 *Among others:* - Our thoughts and sympathy are with the families and friends of the

[OSM-talk-be] oorlogsmonument

2016-03-26 Per discussione Bart Vanherck
Bij ons in Geel staat sinds kort een legertank aan aan speelbos. Hoe kan ik dit het beste taggen? Ik vind zo direct geen voorbeeld. mvg, Bart ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Restriction turn left without traffic sign on pole

2016-03-26 Per discussione Marc Gemis
I would also add 3 turn restrictions, it's more supported than the change:lanes. I leave it to the reader to find the 3 turn restrictions :-) (assuming the small street on the left is not a oneway street) As for the change lanes. Wouldn't change:lanes=no|no be better ? and for the foreground:

Re: [Talk-cz] Kde má být adresa?

2016-03-26 Per discussione Karel Volný
zdar, téma tisíckrát omílané bez všeobecné shody ... OSM připouští různé možnosti, viz http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses osobně považuju za nejlepší mít to na vchodu, popř. na budově, není-li pozice vchodu známa nebo více vchodů má stejnou adresu nicméně za názor, že adresa nemusí

[OSM-talk-be] Restriction turn left without traffic sign on pole

2016-03-26 Per discussione Jakka
Turn to left may not because of full white line. Do not see traffic sign on pole mapillary: http://mapillary.com/map/im/VLAtWJBGOuMcrvmrcDBj-A/photo I resolved it: change:lanes:forward=no_left correct or not ? http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/532483#map=16/51.0094/3.7545=N

Re: [Talk-de] Grenzverlauf unklar, war Re: admin_level 8 entfernen

2016-03-26 Per discussione Dietmar
Für die von mir genannten Ausnahmen dürften eher Zuständigkeiten geregelt sein, echte Gebietsübertragungen hat es, glaube ich, nicht gegeben. Die würden früher oder später ja in echten Grenzveränderungen münden. Die einzelnen Hausnummer-Ausnahmen sind eher schon lange so geregelt, nur das GVZ

Re: [Talk-it] OSMIT 2016 + inaugurazione sede

2016-03-26 Per discussione Dario Crespi
Ciao, credo che OSMit andrebbe messo anche sul Diario di bordo di Wikimedia Italia: http://wiki.wikimedia.it/wiki/Diario_di_bordo Dario Il giorno 24 marzo 2016 14:24, Lorenzo "Beba" Beltrami < lorenzo.b...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Io purtroppo non riuscirò ad esserci... > Saranno fatti dei

Re: [Talk-de] Grenzverlauf unklar, war Re: admin_level 8 entfernen

2016-03-26 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Am 26.03.2016 um 10:57 schrieb Dietmar : > > Keine Ahnung, wo die wählen. Im April gibt es wieder einen Tag der > offenen Tür, dann kann ich mal fragen, was es mit diesen besonderen > Hausnummern aus sich hat. wahrscheinlich gibt es eine Art

Re: [Talk-de] Grenzverlauf unklar, war Re: admin_level 8 entfernen

2016-03-26 Per discussione Dietmar
Hallo Martin, es gibt bei den fraglichen Häusern keine Befestigungswälle oder ähnliches, die hätten wir natürlich erfassst ;) Keine Ahnung, wo die wählen. Im April gibt es wieder einen Tag der offenen Tür, dann kann ich mal fragen, was es mit diesen besonderen Hausnummern aus sich hat. Es sind

Re: [Talk-GB] Open data (Was: Parliamentary debate mentions OSM)

2016-03-26 Per discussione John Aldridge
On 26-Mar-16 06:30, Rob Nickerson wrote: >And there seems to be some more >open data on the way from the OS. Interesting. A good opportunity but maybe also a threat - I wonder what quality of map can now be produced from OGL and other open data and how that compares to OSM. We already have

Re: [Talk-de] Grenzverlauf unklar, war Re: admin_level 8 entfernen

2016-03-26 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Am 26.03.2016 um 10:08 schrieb Dietmar : > > Die Grenzverläufe sind da richtig, das habe wir schonmal mit dem > Augsburger Geodatenamt besprochen und die Infos habe ich auch von > mehreren Infotagen des Amtes, die auf diese Besonderheiten auch öfters >

Re: [Talk-de] Grenzverlauf unklar, war Re: admin_level 8 entfernen

2016-03-26 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Am 26.03.2016 um 10:08 schrieb Dietmar : > > Alle Straßen wurden dort per Definition der Stadt Augsburg zugeordnet, > egal, ob sie sich auf Augsburger Gebiet befinden. Ebenso erhalten alle > Gebäude Augsburger Hausnummern. > > Wir haben mehrere Gebäude,

[Talk-de] Grenzverlauf unklar, war Re: admin_level 8 entfernen

2016-03-26 Per discussione Dietmar
Hallo Martin, vorab: bei uns erhalten bewohnte Gebäude Hausnummern, nicht Grundstücke! Das ist in anderen Bundesländern (auch in Bayern woanderswo?) anders, aber hier ist das so. wir haben einmal ein großes Industrie-/Gewerbegebiet (GVZ Augsburg), das auf den Gemeindegebieten von 3 Gemeinden

Re: [Talk-de] admin_level 8 entfernen

2016-03-26 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Am 26.03.2016 um 08:28 schrieb Dietmar : > > Ja es war gut von ihm, vorher nachzufragen. > Die Bayern-Mailingliste wäre definitiv sinnvoller gewesen, weil z.B. Du > als Ostwestfale vermutlich keinen vor Ort Bezug hast zu den > Grenzverläufen in Bayern im

Re: [Talk-de] admin_level 8 entfernen

2016-03-26 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Am 26.03.2016 um 08:28 schrieb Dietmar : > > Ich weiß aber bereits in meiner > eigene Gemeinde mehrere Hausnumemrn, die örtlich zu Augsburg gehören, > aber außerhalb der Grenze sind (über Infoveranstaltungen des > Geodatenamts erfahren). was meinst Du

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] La Poste et la géolocalisation

2016-03-26 Per discussione Christian Quest
Une plaque de rue posée revient à 100 euros, une plaque de numéro à 5 euros... ce sont peut-être ces coûts qui sont indiqués. A cela il faut ajouter le temps passé par la commune à mener à bien leur projet de dénomination et numérotation. Souvent ça veut dire des documents d'information pour la

Re: [Talk-de] admin_level 8 entfernen

2016-03-26 Per discussione Dietmar
Hallo Tobias, hallo Liste, zu meinem Ton: sorry, war übertrieben. Ich war damals bei zwei Grenzimporten für Bayern dabei und das war ein Riesenaufwand für etliche Leute, daher war ich besorgt um die gemachte Arbeit, habe es aber falsch rübergebracht. Ich habe nochmal nachsehen: wenn Du den

Re: [Talk-de] admin_level 8 entfernen

2016-03-26 Per discussione Tobias
Hi, vornweg fand ich den satz von Dietmar etwas harsch. Sonst gibt es gibt es nichts zu meckern die benötigte Information habe ich schließlich erhalten ;-) Recht hat Dietmar mit der annahme dass ich schon sehr stark von einem Fehler in OSM ausgegangen bin. Meiner Meinung nach könnte das Tagging

Re: [Talk-de] admin_level 8 entfernen

2016-03-26 Per discussione Dietmar
Hallo Florian, hallo Tobias, hallo Liste, die Grenzen sind ein Sonderfall, das wissen wir alle. Es gibt vor Ort fast keine Markierungen, die ein OSM-ler finden kann, um Grenzen zu verifizieren, daher müssen wir dem Import vertrauen. Ohne Grenzimport hätten wir nur Vermutungen, wie die verlaufen

Re: [Talk-de] admin_level 8 entfernen

2016-03-26 Per discussione Florian Lohoff
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 07:39:26PM +0100, Dietmar wrote: > Hallo Tobi, [ ... ] > Bitte las die Grenzen in Ruhe, die sind in Ordnung und werden nur dann > angepasst, wenn es Gemeindegebietsveränderungen gibt, was in Bayern eher > selten vorkommt. Ich hab diesen Satz gelesen und 10 Minuten Später

Re: [Talk-us] mapRe: (Second attempt) Potential data source: Adirondack Park Freshwater Wetlands

2016-03-26 Per discussione Russ Nelson
Frederik Ramm writes: > I have zero knowledge about the Adirondack[s] I live here. Imagine a park half the size of Austria, with about 130K people living in it, and 200K people visiting it. Give about 30K of those people Internet access. Oh, and there are practically no nerds living in the park,