Re: [Talk-us] USGS Large-Scale Imagery degraded this month :(

Hi, * Russ Nelson [161221 00:21]: > Paul Johnson writes: >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Ian Dees wrote: >>> I will try to contact a couple of the folks I know at USGS (maybe they're >>> still on this list and could respond?), but it might be the case

Re: [Talk-it] OpenStreetMap aggiunge la possibilità di autenticarsi tramite l'account Wikimedia

> (cross-posting dalla lista associazione) > > Ciao, > > come forse avete notato OpenStreetMap dà la possibilità di fare login[1] > tramite servizi terzi tra i quali Google, Facebook, Wordpress, ecc. > > Nelle prossime settimane dovrebbe essere aggiunta anche la possibilità > di fare login con

Re: [talk-au] Local Government Areas without Councils

Hummm How about looking at it from a data consumers view point? Who would use boundary level 6 and what for? A resident/occupier/potential purchaser/developer may want to know who is the relevant authority for a particular property ... A new employee many want confirmation of the boundaries of

[Talk-us] Whole-US Garmin Map update - 2016-12-17

These are based off of Lambertus's work here: http://garmin.openstreetmap.nl If you have questions or comments about these maps, please feel free to ask. However, please do not send me private mail. The odds are, someone else will have the same questions, and by asking on the talk-us@

Re: [talk-au] Local Government Areas without Councils

On 2016-12-21 16:28, Warin wrote: :-[ Opps .. line on a map that does not represent what I though it did only one in NSW... on the mainland. Nah, you were right the first time. Lord Howe Island is unincorporated. ___ Talk-au mailing list

Re: [talk-au] Local Government Areas without Councils

On 21-Dec-16 04:19 PM, Warin wrote: On 21-Dec-16 04:09 PM, Andrew Davidson wrote: On 2016-12-21 15:57, Daniel O'Connor wrote: Just want to point out the advice from the wiki: /Don't map your local legislation, if not bound to objects in reality/ /Things such as local traffic rules should only

Re: [talk-au] Local Government Areas without Councils

On 2016-12-21 16:19, Warin wrote: Then how do you then separate out the TWO 'unincorporated areas' in NSW ?? I don't care...provided that you don't use an admin_level 6 boundary. May I suggest admin_level=-6 ? ___ Talk-au mailing list

Re: [talk-au] Local Government Areas without Councils

Straw men seem to be popular this afternoon. The question is not whether or not you map an unincorporated area but how should you map it? One of your first actions was deletion from what I understand of the changesets, after a brief look. Until now you havent conveyed that message (your concern

Re: [talk-au] Local Government Areas without Councils

On 21-Dec-16 04:09 PM, Andrew Davidson wrote: On 2016-12-21 15:57, Daniel O'Connor wrote: Just want to point out the advice from the wiki: /Don't map your local legislation, if not bound to objects in reality/ /Things such as local traffic rules should only be mapped through the objects which

Re: [talk-au] Local Government Areas without Councils

On 2016-12-21 15:57, Daniel O'Connor wrote: Just want to point out the advice from the wiki: /Don't map your local legislation, if not bound to objects in reality/ /Things such as local traffic rules should only be mapped through the objects which represent these rules on the ground, e.g. a

Re: [OSM-ja] osm.jp の更新作業について

いいださん アカウント発行お手数ですがよろしくお願いします！ On 2016/12/21 11:00, Satoshi IIDA wrote: いいだです。 ありがとうございます！ お申し出、たいへん嬉しいです。 近日中にアカウント発行してご連絡します。 中身はDrupalでできているのですが、通常の追加更新くらいであれば さほど難解な作業ではないので、お願いができるとたいへん嬉しいです。 2016年12月19日 10:59 Zoar. : ぞあ. です。 https://openstreetmap.jp/

Re: [talk-au] Local Government Areas without Councils

Just want to point out the advice from the wiki: *Don't map your local legislation, if not bound to objects in reality* *Things such as local traffic rules should only be mapped through the objects which represent these rules on the ground, e.g. a traffic sign, road surface marking. Other rules

Re: [talk-au] Local Government Areas without Councils

On 2016-12-21 15:30, Warin wrote: There is an authority that performs the role of a 'local council' in these areas ... I don't care what it is called. There is in effect a 'local council' there, it is not 'no mans' land', the 'wild west' etc. Nice straw man there... Who said that no council

Re: [talk-au] Local Government Areas without Councils

On 2016-12-21 14:53, Warin wrote: On 21-Dec-16 11:38 AM, Andrew Davidson wrote: On 2016-12-21 11:01, Warin wrote: So the governance is irrelevant to the issue ... the area is managed by 'something' ..that 'something' should be treated the same way in OSM for the same function. The area is

Re: [talk-au] Local Government Areas without Councils

On 21-Dec-16 11:38 AM, Andrew Davidson wrote: On 2016-12-21 11:01, Warin wrote: So the governance is irrelevant to the issue ... the area is managed by 'something' ..that 'something' should be treated the same way in OSM for the same function. The area is managed by the State of New South

Re: [Talk-br] Mapeamento de biomas + Wikipédia

Desculpe-me, abstenho-me de opinar. Estou ausente. Em 20 de dezembro de 2016 22:20, santamariense escreveu: > > @Alexandre Magno, e colegas, vocês acham que seria correto adicionar a > tag "wikipedia=pt:Mata Atlântica" a todos esses "natural=wood"? A > questão da tag

Re: [OSM-ja] osm.jp の更新作業について

いいだです。 ありがとうございます！ お申し出、たいへん嬉しいです。 近日中にアカウント発行してご連絡します。 中身はDrupalでできているのですが、通常の追加更新くらいであれば さほど難解な作業ではないので、お願いができるとたいへん嬉しいです。 2016年12月19日 10:59 Zoar. : > ぞあ. です。 > > https://openstreetmap.jp/ のサイトでマッピングパーティーなどのイベント情報が掲載されて > いますが、差し支えなければ情報の更新メンバーとして参加したい思ってメールを Talk ML

Re: [talk-latam] foto y vídeos de la conferencia State of the Map LatAm 2016

Qué bueno! Me lo perdí, pero al menos fue por una buena causa :) Viva OSM Latam! Me guardan una remera?  Saludos! Fer. -Original message- From: Marco Antonio Sent: Tuesday, December 20 2016, 7:42 pm To: OSM LatAm; OSM Bolivia Subject: [talk-latam] foto y vídeos de la conferencia State

Re: [Talk-br] Mapeamento de biomas + Wikipédia

> Para mim me parece ser o caso de usar > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Key:protected_area > > junto com um multipolígono > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation#Multipolygon Eu nunca mapeei área protegida, mas o problema é que Mata Atlântica existem às milhares

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] question osmose/limite administrative

Moi ce que j'ai compris aux lois françaises sachant que je vis très loin de toute les mers et océans :) c'est ça : tu parles beaucoup des eaux intérieurs mais j'ai l'impression que ce terme a une définition mais dans la réalité ne sert à rien. Rien ne s'applique qu'aux eaux intérieurs. La limite

Re: [talk-au] Local Government Areas without Councils

On 2016-12-21 11:01, Warin wrote: So the governance is irrelevant to the issue ... the area is managed by 'something' ..that 'something' should be treated the same way in OSM for the same function. The area is managed by the State of New South Wales and there is already a admin_level 4

Re: [talk-au] Local Government Areas without Councils

It's pretty simple: 1. Admin level 6 boundaries are supposed to enclose a "Local Government Authority". 2. In NSW the only form of "Local Government Authority" are councils incorporated under the Local Government Act. 3. The areas covered by these councils are "incorporated areas". 4. The

Re: [talk-au] Local Government Areas without Councils

On 21-Dec-16 09:15 AM, cleary wrote: I have been adding administrative boundaries in NSW and SA using the Government data for which OSM has been given explicit permission. I am currently working on the "Pastoral Unincorporated Area" in SA and another mapper commented that it was inappropriate. I

[Talk-it] OpenStreetMap aggiunge la possibilità di autenticarsi tramite l'account Wikimedia

(cross-posting dalla lista associazione) Ciao, come forse avete notato OpenStreetMap dà la possibilità di fare login[1] tramite servizi terzi tra i quali Google, Facebook, Wordpress, ecc. Nelle prossime settimane dovrebbe essere aggiunta anche la possibilità di fare login con l'account

[talk-au] Deletions was Re: Local Government Areas without Councils

On 21-Dec-16 10:45 AM, Nick Hocking wrote: As a side issue: I don't believe that a mapper's work should be deleted by anyone other than the mapper themselves, unless it is agreed on this list that the work was vandalism or copyright violation. I too don't like deleting stuff ... even my own.

Re: [talk-au] Local Government Areas without Councils

Its an interesting one - unlike suburbs, LGAs don't really have a physical presence or much you can survey; even though they have a spatial relationship/are often defined by physical features. For being surveyable... maybe you get a 'welcome to foo shire' sign or two. I would say that* if an LGA

Re: [talk-au] Local Government Areas without Councils

Speaking of SA only I would define the LGA locations administered by the Outback Communities Authority as Unincorporated as - thats how other hierarchies used by Government, ABS etc define it, and every point in SA is either in an LGA or Unincorporated - Unincorporated means Outback Communities

Re: [Talk-us] USGS Large-Scale Imagery degraded this month :(

It probably does. I think the scanned topographic maps are on the same new, slower server. On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:21 PM, Russ Nelson wrote: > Paul Johnson writes: > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Ian Dees wrote: > > > > > > I will try to

Re: [Talk-us] USGS Large-Scale Imagery degraded this month :(

Paul Johnson writes: > On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Ian Dees wrote: > > > > I will try to contact a couple of the folks I know at USGS (maybe they're > > still on this list and could respond?), but it might be the case that we > > need to request the imagery and build

Re: [Talk-cz] RUIAN posun - konečné řešení?

Ahojte, může někdo srozumitelně formulovat problém? O jakém posunu čeho vůči čemu a v jakých řádech se tu bavíme? Díky H. On Tuesday, 20 December 2016, Marián Kyral wrote: > Dne 20.12.2016 v 16:39 Ha Noj napsal(a): > >> Aktuálně je rozdíl RUIAN vs. KM. Takže jsem předpokládal,

[talk-latam] foto y vídeos de la conferencia State of the Map LatAm 2016

Se publicó los (20) vídeos de las charlas de la conferencia "State of the Map LatAm 2016" en Sao Paulo, Brasil. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLPZlngwRgZL261UVakFKk9G5DjyKQ0U8m En la semana iré añadiendo la descripción y el enlace a las presentaciones de todos los vídeos. Por el momento

[talk-au] Local Government Areas without Councils

I have been adding administrative boundaries in NSW and SA using the Government data for which OSM has been given explicit permission. I am currently working on the "Pastoral Unincorporated Area" in SA and another mapper commented that it was inappropriate. I responded but my response appears not

Re: [Talk-GB] 3rd Midlands OSM New Year Meetup

On 20/12/2016 20:55, Paul Sladen wrote: [Based on developments today], Why not hold it at the Bluebell in Attenborough on the evening of Wednesday, 8 January 2016[1]. Because it'd be dark? :) There's no reason why a bunch of OSMers couldn't turn up on that evening _as well_, of course...

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] question osmose/limite administrative

Oui et non. C'est effectivement côté trait de côte à la limite à une coefficient de 120 ou 95 mais pour la Laïta, c'est dû au fait que l'on considère les eau intérieures ou pas. Dans OSM on arrête assez tôt la pleine mer (grosso modo au droit de la plage), dans le trait de côté du SHOM on

Re: [Talk-it] edifici con altezza <= zero (probemi di import?)

Ciao, ho modificato gli edifici di Pavia riportando i dati di altezza presenti nel shapefile dell'edificato rilasciato in CC-BY 3.0 dal Comune e aggiornato a novembre 2016. L'altezza non era effettivamente valorizzata nei dati utilizzati per l'import originale (presenti come attributi con

Re: [Talk-GB] 3rd Midlands OSM New Year Meetup

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 20 Dec 2016, Brian Prangle wrote: > On 20 December 2016 at 13:46, SK53 wrote: > > Just a quick note to say provisional details are: > > Date: Saturday 14th January > > Location: Red Lion, Scalford, Leicestershire [Based

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Données du STIF sur Osmose

Bonjour, Bonne idée Christian ! j'ai créé une page de débug qui précise, dans OSM et dans l'opendata, pour chaque arrêt avec une ref STIF, les lignes desservies : https://ref-lignes-stif.5apps.com/stop.html?osm_stop_id=472985886 il faut lui passer en paramètre l'id OSM du noeud correspondant

Re: [Talk-GB] 3rd Midlands OSM New Year Meetup

Hi Jerry Sorry - can't make that date regards Brian On 20 December 2016 at 13:46, SK53 wrote: > Just a quick note to say provisional details are: > > Date: Saturday 14th January > Location: Red Lion, Scalford, Leicestershire > > I'm keeping this provisional just in case

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] chef-lieu de communes fusionnées

Le 20 décembre 2016 à 10:45, Christian Quest a écrit : > Cherbourg est à Cherbourg-en-Cotentin ce que Belleville est à Paris sauf > que le chef lieu de Paris c'est Paris ;) > pas vraiment, je dirais plutôt que Cherbourg est l'équivalent de Paris dans ce cas et Octeville

Re: [Talk-it] edifici con altezza <= zero (probemi di import?)

sent from a phone > On 20 Dec 2016, at 15:39, Lorenzo Beba Beltrami > wrote: > > > Si tratta di un parcheggio sotterraneo e quindi l'autore ha messo height=0 > assieme a parking=underground e building:levels:underground=1. > È giusto? È sbagliato? Eventuali

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] osmose et adresses bis

Les bis, ter etc... sont des indices de répétitions, mais les A,B,C etc... sont plutôt ce que j'appellerais des indices de déclinaisons (dans le cas du 36bis c'est que le 36 existe (ou existait) et est (était)  vraiment distinct, tandis que le 36A il est souvent situé au situé au 36, de même

Re: [Talk-cz] RUIAN posun - konečné řešení?

Dne 20.12.2016 v 16:39 Ha Noj napsal(a): > > Aktuálně je rozdíl RUIAN vs. KM. Takže jsem předpokládal, že stačí > napasovat RUIAN na KM. Ale jestli je KM taky > > mimo, tak jsme v pr..li úplně. :-( > > *** tak pokud nám stačí, aby to sedělo na cuzk:km v epsg:4326 pak > použijme WFS např. Bukovec

[Talk-gb-westmidlands] FW: [Talk-GB] 3rd Midlands OSM New Year Meetup

From: SK53 [mailto:sk53@gmail.com] Sent: 20 December 2016 13:47 To: talk...@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] 3rd Midlands OSM New Year Meetup Just a quick note to say provisional details are: Date: Saturday 14th January Location: Red Lion, Scalford, Leicestershire I'm

[Talk-us] Election update

Hi all, The elections for the OSM US 2017 board are closed. First off thanks to all who voted, and to those who have become members in the process or decided to renew their membership. You help us support our mission of growing and enabling the OSM US community! We are carefully reviewing

Re: [Talk-pe] rutas en Peru

Hola Robert, Sobre highway=road: entiendo muy bien que uno prefiere mapear en categoria general, mas bien que categoria equivocado. Pero categorizando una via obviamente carrozable como "podria ser camino, podria ser senda o sendero" met parece peor. Yo sugereria marcar como highway=unclassified

Re: [Talk-cz] RUIAN posun - konečné řešení?

> Aktuálně je rozdíl RUIAN vs. KM. Takže jsem předpokládal, že stačí napasovat RUIAN na KM. Ale jestli je KM taky > mimo, tak jsme v pr..li úplně. :-( *** tak pokud nám stačí, aby to sedělo na cuzk:km v epsg:4326 pak použijme WFS např. Bukovec č.p.109 okres FrýdekMístek:

Re: [Talk-pe] rutas en Peru

Hola colega mapero, analizando lo que comentas, no me parece que haya un problema entre la clasificación oficial (*) y la que estamos usando en OSM. Donde puede haber una confusión es el significado de la clasificicación de tipo highway=road, la cual es usada para indicar que tal vía está en

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] osmose et adresses bis

On 20/12/2016 12:40, Christian Quest wrote: A ma connaissance, il n'y a pas franchement de règle pour coller ou non les indices de répétitiion (c'est leur petit nom) aux numéros. D'après le Larousse[1] bis et ter sont des adverbes, et en français je ne crois pas qu'on puisse coller

Re: [Talk-it] edifici con altezza <= zero (probemi di import?)

Ciao, ho notato uno di questi edifici[1] anche a Rubiera, in provincia di Reggio Emilia. Si tratta di un parcheggio sotterraneo e quindi l'autore ha messo height=0 assieme a parking=underground e building:levels:underground=1. È giusto? È sbagliato? Eventuali alternative? Lorenzo [1]

Re: [Talk-it] edifici con altezza <= zero (probemi di import?)

> > credo tu li possa trovare in download qui: http://dati.comune.pv.it/ > site/it/home/dati.html > Purtroppo avevo già visto che non hanno pubblicato un dataset dell'edificato. Comunque ho poco fa trovato lo shape file passando dal portale del SIT del comune. grazie

Re: [Talk-it] edifici con altezza <= zero (probemi di import?)

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Maurizio Napolitano wrote: > Ciao > ho estratto tutti gli edifici d'Italia da OpenStreetMap e, guardando i > dati, ho cominciato a trovarne parecchi con altezza inferiore a zero. > In particolare questi 15 in Friuli Venezia Giulia > [...] Su

Re: [Talk-GB] 3rd Midlands OSM New Year Meetup

Just a quick note to say provisional details are: Date: Saturday 14th January Location: Red Lion, Scalford, Leicestershire I'm keeping this provisional just in case location is an issue for West Midlanders. Let me know if location this is the case. Do come along if you can! Jerry On 14

Re: [Talk-it] OSM e CAI

Cio' che scrivi e' condivisibile ma si riassume poi nella parte finale. la pratica CAI/catasto regionle di assegnare un "name" che nasce da una descrizione e' riportata come tale anche nella wiki ora e si basa su dati certi, nimi diffusi sul territorio. Ovviamente non si suggerisce a nessuno di

Re: [Talk-it] edifici con altezza <= zero (probemi di import?)

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Andrea Albani wrote: > per quanto riguarda Pavia posso occuparmi io di sistemare la questione. > > L'import era stato fatto da Simone Cortesi, pertanto chiedo a lui se ha > per caso ancora i dati in formato raw per fare un check. >

Re: [Talk-it] edifici con altezza <= zero (probemi di import?)

Ciao, per quanto riguarda Pavia posso occuparmi io di sistemare la questione. L'import era stato fatto da Simone Cortesi, pertanto chiedo a lui se ha per caso ancora i dati in formato raw per fare un check. Alternativamente posso fare delle stime tramite survey e/o comparazione con edifici

[OSM-ja] 1/21（土） 東京！街歩き！マッピングパーティ：第４回 根津神社

新宿の山下です。こんにちわ。 東京！街歩き！マッピングパーティ、第４回は 1/21 に東京十社の一社に数えられる根津神社 https://openstreetmap.connpass.com/event/47173/ 東京！街歩き！マッピングパーティは 毎回、未経験者の方にもご参加いただき、 地図作成の楽しさを実感いただいています。 未経験者の皆さまも、もちろんエキスパートの皆さまも ぜひお越しください！！ -- 山下康成＠東京都新宿区 ___ Talk-ja mailing list

[OSM-legal-talk] Tunisia delegations areas import :: Need for a license clearence

Hi, I'm member of OpenStreetMap Tunisia community and i want to bulk upload tunisian delegations areas into OpenStreetMap (the actual data is messy). I need a license clearence, so can i get confirmation that data's license is compatible with OSM ? The data source is an official goverment open

Re: [OSM-talk] Applying different restrictions in different directions on a road

" oneway=yes oneway:bicycle=no oneway:PSV=no " should do the trick Volker ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Applying different restrictions in different directions on a road

On 20/12/16 11:37, joost schouppe wrote: The bicycle wiki page has examples for many different kinds of situations: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle Basically, you can have restrictions based on mode of transport (eg oneway:bycicle) or if really needed have access tags with a

[Talk-br] Sobre addr:interpolation - possibilidades

@santamariense, Ótimo ter contatado este pessoal! O colaborador Antonio Guarda mostra exatamente aquilo que vínhamos pensando. E cita aquele deslocamento referido antes (que terá que ser reposicionado manualmente, mas nada que seja muito complicado). E o mais importante: ele aponta que já

Re: [Talk-cz] RUIAN posun - konečné řešení?

Ahoj, -- Původní zpráva -- Od: Ha Noj Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 20. 12. 2016 11:42:22 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] RUIAN posun - konečné řešení? " Cau 1) CUZK problem svych dat RUIAN mimo JTSK (rozdily WFS v ETRS89 vs

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] osmose et adresses bis

A ma connaissance, il n'y a pas franchement de règle pour coller ou non les indices de répétitiion (c'est leur petit nom) aux numéros. On peut par contre se fixer une convention dans OSM. Je favoriserait le fait de coller les indices, car on peut facilement les séparer si besoin et surtout ça

Re: [OSM-talk] Applying different restrictions in different directions on a road

The bicycle wiki page has examples for many different kinds of situations: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle Basically, you can have restrictions based on mode of transport (eg oneway:bycicle) or if really needed have access tags with a direction (bicycle:forward). 2016-12-20 11:34

[OSM-talk-fr] osmose et adresses bis

Bonjour, au moins sur Rennes, les adresses en "bis" et "ter" sont indiquées en erreur sur osmose. Elles sont bien indiquées sur OSM, par exemple : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4225509127 a le tag addr:housenumber = "39 bis", et osmose propose plutôt "39bis" (sans espace), de même pour

Re: [Talk-cz] RUIAN posun - konečné řešení?

Cau 1) CUZK problem svych dat RUIAN mimo JTSK (rozdily WFS v ETRS89 vs WGS84) napul nevnima, napul neovlada a tak ho resit zda se nehodla. Mluvil jsem opet v lete p. Souckem. Zrejme jsme jedini, ktery RUIAN uzivaji mimo JTSK a vadi jim to. 2) Transformace gridem je znama:

[OSM-talk] Applying different restrictions in different directions on a road

I think I have asked this before a long time ago here - but I can't find the original message, or remember the answer I'm afraid. I am trying to add tags to a road which has permission for all vehicles forward, but only buses and bicycles backward. I can't get my head around how to do this.

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] question osmose/limite administrative

Pour visualiser les limites d'ADMIN EXPRESS, je les ai ajoutées dans le rendu "Route500" (pointillé violet + nom des communes). Merci pour vos retours sur l'opportunité de garder cette analyse... j'ai un gros doute sur la pertinence d'après mes contrôles sur le 89 (donc pas en lien avec les

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] chef-lieu de communes fusionnées

Cherbourg est à Cherbourg-en-Cotentin ce que Belleville est à Paris sauf que le chef lieu de Paris c'est Paris ;) Effectivement, ne plus du tout avoir le nom de l'ancienne commune car elle est devenue le chef lieu de la commune nouvelle est dommage. Il me semble utile de le préserver sur le

[Talk-cz] RUIAN posun - konečné řešení?

Ahoj, další vánoce před námi a stále nám chybí ta korekční matice či co to je. Asi žádný posun nenastal co? Co přesně potřebujeme? V jakém formátu a kolik bodů to má být? V souvislosti s tím, co psal Martin Janda mne napadlo, jestli by třeba nestačilo vzít pár míst, kde to ulítává nejvíc, tam

[OSM-talk-fr] Défusion de communes !

A ne pas oublier... http://www.paris-normandie.fr/actualites/politique/sigy-en-bray-et-saint-lucien-se-separent-a-l-amiable-JI7802209 -- Christian Quest - OpenStreetMap France ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-cz] Trasovani RUIAN - prosim poradne

Ahoj, kapku jsem se ztratil. Co přesně je za problém? To že se nepřetrasovaly všechny budovy? Třeba tam fyzicky nejsou, nebo byly přehlédnuty. V tom případě zůstanou ve vrstvě budovy-todo na http://ruian.poloha.net/ a časem je třeba někdo dotrasuje. Ten případný posun je sice k vzteku, ale

[Talk-cz] Trasovani RUIAN - prosim poradne

Dobry den, je dobre ze dochazi k trasovani RUIAN ale mohu pozadat o trasovani kompletni a prosim bez posunuti proti referenci. Jako proklad davam: "Nedvědice pod Pernštejnem" https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44534509#map=15/49.4611/16.3319 Stare jiz natrasovane budovy jsou bez zmeny a

Re: [Talk-it] OSM e CAI

2016-12-19 17:09 GMT+01:00 girarsi_liste : > Il 19/12/2016 13:56, Luca Delucchi ha scritto: >> allora ho guardato questo preset e non va bene perchè ci sono diverse >> problematiche, la più importante è che mette i sentieri CAI com rwn >> invece è stato deciso che sono al